Skip to main content
Food Science & Nutrition logoLink to Food Science & Nutrition
. 2025 Aug 28;13(9):e70496. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.70496

Polyphenols and Alzheimer's Disease: A Review on Molecular and Therapeutic Insights With In Silico Support

Guifei Chen 1, Yan Su 2, Siyu Chen 2, Tiandong Lin 2,3,, Xueying Lin 3,
PMCID: PMC12391731  PMID: 40895150

ABSTRACT

Alzheimer's disease (AD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, characterized by amyloid‐beta (Aβ) aggregation, tau hyperphosphorylation, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation resulted the cognitive memory loss. Despite extensive research, effective therapeutic treatment remains elusive. Polyphenols, naturally occurring bioactive compounds, have emerged as promising neuroprotective agents due to their potent antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and amyloid‐modulating properties. Research indicated that these bioactive compounds have potent antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties, have garnered significant attention for their potential role in combating AD by targeting its key pathological mechanisms. Preclinical studies highlight the efficacy of various polyphenols, such as resveratrol, curcumin, and epigallocatechin gallate, in improving cognitive function and reducing neurodegeneration. Moreover, in silico approaches, displayed polyphenols mechanistic interactions with key AD targets to reduce pathogenesis. These computational models accelerate drug discovery by predicting binding affinities, optimizing structural modifications, and identifying novel polyphenol derivatives with enhanced therapeutic potential. This review explores the multifaceted role of polyphenols in AD mitigation, emphasizing their impact on oxidative stress and neuroinflammation while integrating in silico evidence to reinforce their therapeutic relevance. Convincingly, through the suppression of key mediators of AD, including oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, amyloid‐beta and tau proteins, polyphenols exhibited outstanding therapeutic potential to treat AD.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, in silico approach, neuroprotection, oxidative stress, polyphenols


Polyphenols, known for their antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties, show strong potential in mitigating Alzheimer's disease by targeting oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, amyloid‐beta aggregation, and tau hyperphosphorylation. Preclinical and in silico studies highlight compounds like resveratrol, curcumin, and epigallocatechin gallate for their neuroprotective effects and interaction with key Alzheimer's disease related targets. These findings underscore polyphenols as promising therapeutic agents in combating Alzheimer's disease and advancing drug discovery efforts. Represents the potential of polyphenols in mitigating pathological features of Alzheimer's Disease.

graphic file with name FSN3-13-e70496-g006.jpg

1. Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline, memory loss, and behavioral disturbances. It is the most common cause of dementia, affecting over 50 million people worldwide, with projections suggesting this number will triple by 2050 (As 2023; Rai et al. 2024). The pathogenesis of AD is multifactorial, involving the accumulation of amyloid‐beta (Aβ) plaques, neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) composed of hyperphosphorylated tau protein, oxidative stress, and chronic neuroinflammation (García‐Morales et al. 2021; Simunkova et al. 2019). Despite decades of research, effective disease‐modifying therapies remain elusive, highlighting the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. In recent years, natural compounds, particularly polyphenols, have garnered significant attention for their potential to mitigate AD pathology through their multifaceted mechanisms of action (Liu et al. 2023).

Polyphenols are a diverse group of phytochemicals found abundantly in fruits, vegetables, tea, coffee, and wine. They are classified into flavonoids, phenolic acids, stilbenes, and lignans, each with unique structural and functional properties (Hassan et al. 2023; Pandey and Rizvi 2009). These compounds exhibit potent antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and neuroprotective effects, making them promising candidates for combating AD. Oxidative stress, a hallmark of AD, arises from an imbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and the brain's antioxidant defense mechanisms (Arain et al. 2018). The brain is particularly vulnerable to oxidative damage due to its high oxygen consumption, lipid‐rich content, and relatively low antioxidant capacity (Butterfield and Halliwell 2019). Polyphenols, such as curcumin, resveratrol, and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), have been shown to scavenge ROS, upregulate endogenous antioxidant enzymes, and chelate metal ions, thereby reducing oxidative damage to neurons (Vauzour et al. 2010; Yatao et al. 2018).

Neuroinflammation, another critical contributor to AD progression, involves the activation of microglia and astrocytes, leading to the release of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Chronic inflammation exacerbates neuronal damage and synaptic loss, further impairing cognitive function (Patterson 2015). Polyphenols modulate neuroinflammatory pathways by inhibiting the activation of nuclear factor‐kappa B (NF‐κB) and mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, thereby reducing the production of inflammatory mediators (Zhang et al. 2010). For instance, resveratrol has been shown to suppress microglial activation and reduce the secretion of interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β) and tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α) in preclinical models of AD (Capiralla et al. 2012).

In addition to their biological effects, advances in computational biology have provided valuable insights into the molecular interactions between polyphenols and AD‐related targets. In silico studies, including molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations, have elucidated the binding affinities and mechanisms of polyphenols with key proteins such as beta‐secretase (BACE1), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and tau (Dhakal et al. 2019). These computational approaches have not only validated the therapeutic potential of natural products including polyphenols but also guided the design of novel analogs with enhanced efficacy and bioavailability (Arain et al. 2024; Ashraf et al. 2024; Safdar et al. 2024).

Despite the promising preclinical evidence, challenges remain in translating these findings into clinical practice. Issues such as poor bioavailability, rapid metabolism, and limited blood–brain barrier permeability hinder the therapeutic application of polyphenols. However, advancements in drug delivery systems, including nanoparticles and liposomes, offer potential solutions to these limitations (Nabi, Arain, Hassan, et al. 2020; Prajapati et al. 2025; Teleanu et al. 2018). This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of polyphenols in targeting oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in AD, supported by in silico evidence, and to discuss future directions for their development as therapeutic agents.

2. Overview of Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease is a progressive, irreversible neurodegenerative disorder and the most common cause of dementia, accounting for 60%–80% of all dementia cases (Alzheimer's Association 2023). It is characterized by a gradual decline in cognitive functions, including memory, reasoning, language, and the ability to perform daily activities (Rai 2021). AD typically manifests in individuals over the age of 65, although early‐onset forms of the disease can occur in younger individuals. The global prevalence of AD is staggering, with over 50 million people currently affected, and this number is projected to rise to 152 million by 2050 due to aging populations (Saxena et al. 2012).

The pathological hallmarks of AD include the accumulation of extracellular amyloid‐beta (Aβ) plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) composed of hyperphosphorylated tau protein. Aβ plaques result from the abnormal cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by beta‐secretase (BACE1) and gamma‐secretase, leading to the aggregation of Aβ peptides, particularly Aβ42, which is highly toxic to neurons (Hardy and Selkoe 2002). NFTs, on the other hand, arise from the hyperphosphorylation of tau protein, which disrupts microtubule stability and impairs neuronal transport, ultimately leading to cell death (Iqbal et al. 2010).

In addition to these hallmark features, AD is associated with oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, synaptic dysfunction, and neuronal loss. Oxidative stress occurs due to an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the brain's antioxidant defenses, leading to damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA (Butterfield and Halliwell 2019). Neuroinflammation, driven by the activation of microglia and astrocytes, exacerbates neuronal damage through the release of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (Heneka et al. 2015). Synaptic dysfunction and loss, particularly in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex, are early events in AD and correlate strongly with cognitive decline (Selkoe 2002; Singh et al. 2024). The clinical progression of AD is typically divided into three stages: preclinical, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia. During the preclinical stage, pathological changes such as Aβ accumulation and tau phosphorylation occur without noticeable symptoms. In the MCI stage, individuals experience mild memory deficits but retain functional independence. As the disease progresses to the dementia stage, cognitive and functional impairments become severe, leading to complete dependence on caregivers (Jack Jr. et al. 2018).

Current treatments for AD, such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., donepezil) and NMDA receptor antagonists (e.g., memantine), provide symptomatic relief but do not halt or reverse disease progression. The recent approval of disease‐modifying therapies like aducanumab and lecanemab, which target Aβ plaques, has sparked hope; however, their efficacy and safety remain controversial (Cummings et al. 2021). This underscores the need for alternative therapeutic strategies that address the multifactorial nature of AD, including oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction. In this context, natural compounds such as polyphenols have emerged as promising candidates due to their multifaceted mechanisms of action, including antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties. Understanding the complex interplay of AD pathology and exploring novel therapeutic approaches are critical to developing effective treatments for this devastating disease.

3. Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease

The pathogenesis of AD is multifactorial, involving the interplay of genetic, environmental, amyloid‐beta (Aβ) plaque deposition, tau hyperphosphorylation, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction. Two hallmark pathological features of AD are the accumulation of extracellular amyloid‐beta (Aβ) plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) composed of hyperphosphorylated tau protein (Long and Holtzman 2019). Aβ plaques result from the abnormal cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by beta‐secretase (BACE1) and gamma‐secretase, leading to the production of toxic Aβ peptides, particularly Aβ42, which aggregates and forms insoluble plaques. These plaques disrupt synaptic function, induce oxidative stress, and trigger neuroinflammation, contributing to neuronal damage and cell death (Hardy and Higgins 1992). The important pathological mechanisms contributed to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Summary of the important pathological mechanisms contributing to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease.

Pathological mechanism Description Key effects References
Amyloid‐beta (Aβ) Plaque Formation Abnormal cleavage of APP by BACE1 and gamma‐secretase, leading to Aβ aggregation. Synaptic dysfunction, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. Hardy and Higgins (1992); Long and Holtzman (2019)
Tau Hyperphosphorylation Hyperphosphorylation of tau protein leading to NFT formation. Disruption of microtubules, impaired neuronal transport, and cell death. Iqbal et al. (2010); Wang et al. (2019)
Oxidative Stress Imbalance between ROS production and antioxidant defenses. Lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA damage. Butterfield and Halliwell (2019); Nunomura et al. (2006)
Neuroinflammation Activation of microglia and astrocytes, releasing pro‐inflammatory cytokines. Neuronal damage, synaptic loss, and exacerbation of Aβ and tau pathology. Heneka et al. (2015); Heppner et al. (2015)
Mitochondrial Dysfunction Impaired mitochondrial function and energy metabolism. Reduced ATP production, increased ROS, and neuronal apoptosis. Reddy and Beal (2008); Swerdlow (2018)
Synaptic Dysfunction Loss of synaptic connections and impaired neurotransmission. Cognitive decline and memory impairment. Hardy and Selkoe (2002); Terry Jr et al. (2011)
Blood–Brain Barrier (BBB) Disruption Compromised integrity of the BBB. Increased permeability to toxins and inflammatory cells. Montagne et al. (2017); Sweeney et al. (2018)
Cholinergic Dysfunction Loss of cholinergic neurons and reduced acetylcholine levels. Impaired memory and learning. Bartus et al. (1982); Cheng et al. (2021)
Glutamate Excitotoxicity Excessive glutamate leading to overactivation of NMDA receptors. Neuronal damage and cell death. Esposito et al. (2013); Koutsilieri and Riederer (2007)
Autophagy Dysregulation Impaired clearance of damaged organelles and protein aggregates. Accumulation of toxic proteins and cellular debris. Di Meco et al. (2020); Uddin et al. (2018)
Vascular Dysfunction Reduced cerebral blood flow and vascular damage. Hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, and Aβ accumulation. Govindpani et al. (2019); Sweeney et al. (2019)
Epigenetic Alterations Changes in DNA methylation and histone modification. Altered gene expression related to AD pathology. Sanchez‐Mut and Gräff (2015)
Protein Misfolding and Aggregation Misfolding of proteins like Aβ and tau. Formation of toxic oligomers and aggregates. Ashraf et al. (2014)
Calcium Homeostasis Disruption Dysregulation of intracellular calcium levels. Neuronal excitotoxicity and apoptosis. Popugaeva et al. (2017); Small (2009)
Iron Dysregulation Accumulation of iron in the brain. Increased oxidative stress and neuronal damage. Mandel et al. (2007)

NFTs, on the other hand, arise from the hyperphosphorylation of tau, a microtubule‐associated protein that stabilizes neuronal cytoskeletons. Hyperphosphorylated tau detaches from microtubules, aggregates, and forms paired helical filaments, leading to the collapse of the neuronal transport system and subsequent neurodegeneration (Han et al. 2014). Oxidative stress is another critical contributor to AD pathogenesis. The brain's high metabolic activity and lipid‐rich environment make it particularly susceptible to reactive oxygen species (ROS)‐induced damage. Oxidative stress exacerbates Aβ toxicity, promotes tau phosphorylation, and impairs mitochondrial function, further accelerating neuronal degeneration (Butterfield and Halliwell 2019). Chronic neuroinflammation, driven by the activation of microglia and astrocytes, also plays a pivotal role in AD progression. Activated glial cells release pro‐inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β) and tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α), which exacerbate neuronal damage and synaptic loss (Heneka et al. 2015). Additionally, genetic factors, including mutations in APP, presenilin 1 (PSEN1), and presenilin 2 (PSEN2), as well as the ε4 allele of apolipoprotein E (APOE4), increase the risk of AD by influencing amyloid and tau pathology (Karran and De Strooper 2016). Together, these interconnected mechanisms create a vicious cycle of neurodegeneration, ultimately leading to the clinical manifestations of AD. Figure 1 summarizes the pathological feature of normal and AD brain used for diagnosis.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Showing the comparative neuropathological features of normal and Alzheimer's disease brain. (Created by Biorender).

4. Therapeutic Strategies for Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains one of the most challenging neurodegenerative disorders to treat, with no cure currently available. However, several therapeutic strategies have been developed to manage symptoms, slow disease progression, and target underlying pathological mechanisms. These approaches can be broadly categorized into pharmacological interventions, lifestyle modifications, and emerging therapies.

4.1. Pharmacological Interventions for Alzheimer's Disease

Current pharmacological interventions for AD primarily focus on symptom management rather than disease modification. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs), such as donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine, are the first‐line treatments for mild to moderate AD (Moreira et al. 2022). These drugs enhance cholinergic neurotransmission by inhibiting the breakdown of acetylcholine, thereby improving cognitive and functional symptoms (Cummings et al. 2019). Memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, is approved for moderate to severe AD. It regulates glutamate activity, preventing excitotoxicity and slowing disease progression (McShane et al. 1996). Recently, aducanumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid‐beta (Aβ), received conditional approval as the first disease‐modifying therapy for AD, though its efficacy remains controversial (Knopman et al. 2021). Ongoing research aims to develop therapies targeting tau pathology, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress to address the underlying mechanisms of AD.

4.2. Lifestyle and Non‐Pharmacological Interventions for Alzheimer's Disease

Lifestyle modifications and non‐pharmacological interventions play a crucial role in managing AD and improving quality of life. Regular physical exercise, such as aerobic and resistance training, has been shown to enhance cognitive function, reduce neuroinflammation, and promote neurogenesis (Ngandu et al. 2015). A balanced diet, particularly the Mediterranean or MIND diet, rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and omega‐3 fatty acids, may slow cognitive decline by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation (Arain et al. 2023; Morris et al. 2015). Cognitive stimulation through puzzles, reading, and social engagement helps maintain mental agility and delay symptom progression. Additionally, mindfulness‐based stress reduction and adequate sleep hygiene can mitigate stress and improve overall brain health. These interventions, when combined, offer a holistic approach to managing AD.

4.3. Emerging and Combination Therapies for Alzheimer's Disease

Emerging therapies for AD, targeted the key pathological mechanisms, including amyloid‐beta (Aβ) plaques, tau tangles, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. Monoclonal antibodies like lecanemab and donanemab have demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials by clearing Aβ plaques and slowing cognitive decline (Swanson et al. 2021). Tau‐focused therapies, such as aggregation inhibitors and anti‐tau antibodies, aim to prevent neurofibrillary tangle formation (Zempel et al. 2013). Additionally, natural compounds like polyphenols are being investigated for their antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory effects, while gene‐editing technologies, including CRISPR, offer potential for modulating AD‐related genes (Ullah et al. 2024). These approaches, combined with advanced drug delivery systems, represent promising avenues for disease‐modifying treatments.

Combination therapies address AD's multifactorial nature by simultaneously targeting Aβ, tau, oxidative stress, and inflammation. For instance, anti‐amyloid antibodies like aducanumab are being paired with tau inhibitors and anti‐inflammatory agents to enhance therapeutic outcomes (Cummings et al. 2021). Polyphenols are also explored as adjuncts to conventional therapies due to their neuroprotective properties (Kumari et al. 2022). While combination strategies hold promise for slowing disease progression, challenges such as drug interactions and optimal dosing require further research to maximize efficacy and safety.

5. Therapeutic Properties of Polyphenols

Polyphenols are bioactive compounds found in plant‐based foods like fruits, vegetables, tea, and wine, known for their diverse therapeutic properties. They are classified into flavonoids, phenolic acids, stilbenes, and lignans, each contributing to their health benefits (Alagawany et al. 2020; Rehman et al. 2025). Polyphenols exhibit potent antioxidant activity by scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) and enhancing endogenous antioxidant defenses, protecting cells from oxidative damage linked to chronic diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and cardiovascular disorders (Nabi, Arain, Rajput, et al. 2020; Pandey and Rizvi 2009). Their anti‐inflammatory effects are mediated through the inhibition of pro‐inflammatory pathways like NF‐κB and MAPK, reducing the production of cytokines such as IL‐1β and TNF‐α (Buzdar et al. 2025; Zhang et al. 2010).

Polyphenols also show neuroprotective properties by inhibiting amyloid‐beta (Aβ) aggregation and tau hyperphosphorylation, key features of AD (Freyssin et al. 2018). Additionally, they exhibit cardioprotective, anticancer, and antidiabetic effects by improving endothelial function, modulating cell signaling pathways, and enhancing insulin sensitivity (Qian et al. 2022). Despite their potential, challenges like low bioavailability require innovative delivery systems for clinical application.

5.1. Polyphenols and Oxidative Stress

Polyphenols are renowned for their potent antioxidant properties, which play a critical role in mitigating oxidative stress, a key contributor to the pathogenesis of numerous chronic diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer (Saeed et al. 2021; Saeed, Naveed, et al. 2017b). Oxidative stress arises from an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the body's antioxidant defense mechanisms. The brain is particularly vulnerable to oxidative damage due to its high oxygen consumption, lipid‐rich environment, and relatively low antioxidant capacity (Butterfield and Halliwell 2019). Polyphenols, such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, and stilbenes, exhibit multifaceted mechanisms in mitigating oxidative stress, particularly in the context of AD, where oxidative imbalance significantly contributes to disease onset and progression.

Polyphenols directly scavenge ROS, including superoxide anions, hydroxyl radicals, and peroxynitrite, remain fundamental (Pandey and Rizvi 2009; Saeed, Babazadeh, et al. 2017a), emerging evidence highlights the pivotal role of polyphenols in modulating intracellular signaling cascades associated with oxidative stress and neuroinflammation. Additionally, polyphenols chelate metal ions like iron and copper, which catalyze the formation of highly reactive hydroxyl radicals through Fenton reactions, further reducing oxidative damage (Fraga et al. 2010). Notably, several polyphenols exert neuroprotection by influencing the nuclear factor erythroid 2‐related factor 2 (Nrf2), nuclear factor‐kappa B (NF‐κB), and mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, which are intricately involved in redox homeostasis, inflammatory responses, and neuronal survival (Jazvinšćak Jembrek et al. 2021; Moratilla‐Rivera et al. 2023). Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) for instance, not only enhances endogenous antioxidant enzyme activities such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase but also promotes Nrf2 nuclear translocation, leading to the transcriptional activation of antioxidant response element (ARE)‐driven genes (Tang et al. 2024). Recently, (Tang et al. 2024) demonstrated that administering EGCG at a dose of 50 mg/kg significantly reduced oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease models by activating the Keap1/Nrf2 signaling pathway. This activation increased the expression of critical antioxidant enzymes, including HO‐1 and NQO1, resulting in enhanced neuroprotection and improved cognitive function. Furthermore, in vitro findings corroborate these effects, revealing that EGCG at an effective concentration of 10 μM significantly mitigates β‐amyloid‐induced oxidative and nitrosative stress. Specifically, EGCG elevated the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and CAT, while concurrently reducing the levels of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), thereby preventing neuronal apoptosis (Kim et al. 2009). Similarly, resveratrol attenuates NF‐κB‐mediated neuroinflammatory signaling, thereby reducing the expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines like TNF‐α and IL‐1β, which are elevated in AD brains (Singh et al. 2020). Quercetin, another potent flavonoid, demonstrates dual modulation by both activating Nrf2 and inhibiting MAPK signaling cascades, thereby suppressing oxidative stressinduced neuronal apoptosis (Islam et al. 2025; Saeed, Naveed, et al. 2017b).

Comparative analyses of these polyphenols across different in vivo and in vitro AD models reveal differential efficacy; for example, EGCG has shown pronounced inhibition of amyloid‐beta aggregation and ROS generation in transgenic mouse models, whereas curcumin primarily targets tau phosphorylation and microglial activation via downregulation of NF‐κB and MAPK pathways (Henríquez et al. 2020; Wu et al. 2022). Such mechanistic distinctions underscore the need for a hierarchical evaluation of polyphenolic efficacy tailored to specific pathological features of AD. While the antioxidant and metal‐chelating capabilities of polyphenols contribute to general neuroprotection, their signaling‐specific actions determine their therapeutic precision. Overall, a deeper mechanistic understanding reveals that polyphenols are not only act as ROS scavengers but also serve as dynamic modulators of intracellular networks, offering a promising, nuanced approach to counteracting oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in AD pathogenesis.

5.2. Polyphenols and Inflammation

Polyphenols, a diverse group of plant‐derived bioactive compounds, effectively modulate inflammatory pathways and reduce the production of pro‐inflammatory mediators, making them valuable in managing chronic inflammatory diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic syndromes. Mechanistically, polyphenols exert their anti‐inflammatory and neuroprotective effects primarily through the modulation of the key intracellular signaling pathways, such as NF‐κB, Nrf2, and MAPK (Du et al. 2024). These pathways orchestrate the cellular response to oxidative insults and inflammatory stimuli, leading to the regulation of the expression of inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and enzymes like cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (Zhang et al. 2010). For instance, curcumin inhibits NF‐κB signaling by preventing IκB degradation and subsequent nuclear translocation of NF‐κB subunits, thereby suppressing the expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as TNF‐α, IL‐1β, and IL‐6 (Fuloria et al. 2022). Concurrently, it activates the Nrf2 pathway, promoting the transcription of antioxidant response element (ARE)‐dependent genes like heme oxygenase‐1 (HO‐1) and NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1 (NQO1), which enhance cellular antioxidant defenses (Balogun et al. 2003). Resveratrol, another potent polyphenol, modulates both MAPK and NF‐κB signaling in AD models, where it attenuates microglial activation, reduces pro‐inflammatory cytokine release, and protects against amyloid‐beta (Aβ)‐induced neurotoxicity (Capiralla et al. 2012). Furthermore, EGCG derived from green tea similarly suppresses MAPK signaling and promotes Nrf2‐mediated antioxidant gene expression, reducing oxidative damage and inflammation in neuronal cells (Valverde‐Salazar et al. 2023).

Beyond pathway inhibition, polyphenols modulate immune responses by influencing macrophage and microglial polarization, shifting from a pro‐inflammatory M1 phenotype to an anti‐inflammatory M2 state, thereby enhancing the release of anti‐inflammatory mediators such as IL‐10 and arginase‐1 (Di Meo et al. 2020). Among various polyphenols, resveratrol has emerged as a particularly promising neuroprotective agent against AD (Pasinetti 2012). It was reported that resveratrol modulates several critical aspects of AD pathology, including the aggregation of beta‐amyloid peptides, oxidative stress, and chronic neuroinflammation (Pasinetti 2012). Preclinical studies have demonstrated that prolonged administration of resveratrol at doses of 100 mg/kg/day significantly attenuates AD‐like neuropathological changes in animal models (Pasinetti 2012). These protective effects are attributed to resveratrol's pleiotropic mechanisms of action, which include its potent antioxidant capacity, suppression of pro‐inflammatory signaling pathways such as NF‐κB, and activation of sirtuin‐1 (SIRT1) a longevity‐associated deacetylase implicated in neuronal survival and metabolic regulation. Comparative analyses across various AD models suggest curcumin and resveratrol are among the most effective polyphenols in attenuating neuroinflammation and cognitive decline, although EGCG shows promising results in reducing Aβ aggregation and oxidative stress. These differences in efficacy may reflect variances in bioavailability, blood–brain barrier permeability, and specificity toward signaling cascades. For example, while curcumin has strong NF‐κB and Nrf2 modulation capabilities, its limited bioavailability necessitates formulation enhancements for clinical application (McGrattan et al. 2019). In contrast, resveratrol demonstrates better brain penetration but may require higher doses to achieve therapeutic effects (Andrade et al. 2018). Collectively, polyphenols represent a multifaceted therapeutic strategy against AD by simultaneously modulating oxidative and inflammatory signaling pathways, with their comparative efficacy contingent upon molecular targets, pharmacokinetics, and model‐specific pathophysiology.

5.3. Polyphenols and Neuroprotection

Polyphenols play a significant role in neuroprotection by targeting key mechanisms implicated in neurodegenerative diseases like AD, Parkinson's disease (PD), and other cognitive disorders. Their role in neuroprotection is primarily attributed to their ability to mitigate oxidative stress, reduce neuroinflammation, modulate neurotransmitter activity, and enhance neurogenesis (Butterfield and Halliwell 2019). Their therapeutic effects are mediated through modulation of redox‐sensitive signaling pathways, suppression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines (IL‐1β, TNF‐α) via NF‐κB and MAPK inhibition, and prevention of amyloid‐beta (Aβ) and tau protein aggregation (Fernandes et al. 2021; Yahfoufi et al. 2018). One of the critical advantages of polyphenols is their capacity to cross the blood–brain barrier, allowing them to exert direct antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory actions within neural tissues. Previously, (Figueira, Garcia, et al. 2017b) demonstrated that specific polyphenol metabolites, such as catechin derivatives and phenyl‐γ‐valerolactones, selectively accumulate in brain endothelial cells and neurons, where they mitigate oxidative damage.

Recent advancements in nanotechnology have further enhanced the bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy of polyphenols. For example, (Mamashli et al. 2023) demonstrated that propolis‐derived polyphenol nanosheets exhibit robust neuroprotective effects in rotenone‐induced PD models. These nanosheets significantly improved neuronal survival, reduced oxidative damage, preserved dopaminergic neurons, and inhibited α‐synuclein aggregation (Mamashli et al. 2023). Notably, the optimal in vivo neuroprotective dose was identified as 0.5 mg/kg, which produced substantial behavioral and histological improvements. In a randomized, double‐blind, placebo controlled clinical trial, (Carrillo et al. 2025) evaluated the cognitive and neuroprotective effects of a polyphenol rich nutraceutical, Juice Plus + Premium. The supplement, which contains over 119 distinct polyphenolic compounds derived from fruit, vegetable, and berry juice powders, was administered daily over two 16‐week periods with a 4‐week washout. The trial, involving 92 participants, reported improvements in cognitive function and neuroprotective biomarkers, underscoring the clinical relevance of dietary polyphenol supplementation (Carrillo et al. 2025). Curcumin, a well‐studied polyphenol with potent anti‐oxidative properties, has shown significant neuroprotective effects in preclinical studies (Figueira, Garcia, et al. 2017b). It was reported that curcumin administration at 100 mg/kg body weight/day for 14–21 days significantly improved spatial memory, reduced lipid peroxidation, and restored the activities of key antioxidant enzymes, including SOD, CAT, and GPx, in rat models of homocysteine induced neurotoxicity (Ataie et al. 2010; Figueira, Garcia, et al. 2017b). Moreover, (Rajasekar et al. 2013) demonstrated that curcumin attenuates okadaic acid induced memory impairment in mice. At the same effective dose, curcumin improved cognitive performance and reduced markers of oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, highlighting its therapeutic promise in tauopathy associated neurodegeneration (Rajasekar et al. 2013).

Despite promising preclinical outcomes, the translational potential of polyphenols into clinical settings remains challenged by issues of low bioavailability, limited blood brain barrier (BBB) permeability, and metabolic instability factors—critical for their efficacy in human neurodegenerative conditions. Most polyphenols undergo extensive first pass metabolism and conjugation, significantly reducing their bioactive concentrations in the brain (Zhang et al. 2022). Moreover, the ability of polyphenols to penetrate the BBB is compound specific and often suboptimal, necessitating advanced delivery strategies such as nanoformulations or prodrugs to enhance CNS targeting (Ramakrishna et al. 2025; Samal et al. 2025). Collectively, these findings underscore the multifaceted neuroprotective potential of polyphenols through antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, anti‐amyloidogenic, and neurogenic mechanisms. Their favorable pharmacokinetics, particularly BBB permeability, along with emerging nanotechnological strategies, further strengthen their candidacy as therapeutic agents against neurodegenerative diseases.

5.4. Polyphenols and Alzheimer's Disease

Recently polyphenols, have gained significant attention for their potential therapeutic option against AD. Polyphenols, inhibit amyloid‐beta (Aβ) aggregation and tau hyperphosphorylation, hallmarks of AD pathology (Kabir et al. 2023), while modulating neuroinflammation by attenuating microglial and astrocytic activation (Tayab et al. 2022). Beyond these cellular mechanisms, polyphenols promote synaptic plasticity, stimulate neurogenesis, and support mitochondrial function, thereby improving neuronal resilience and cognitive function (Spencer 2020). Despite promising preclinical data, the translational potential of polyphenols to human clinical settings remains constrained by their poor bioavailability, limited blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration, and rapid metabolic degradation (Figueira, Menezes, et al. 2017a). Moreover, only select polyphenols or their derivatives demonstrate the physicochemical properties necessary to traverse the BBB effectively, a prerequisite for central nervous system activity (Velásquez‐Jiménez et al. 2021). Addressing these limitations through novel drug delivery systems such as nanoformulations or structural modifications is crucial for enhancing their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in humans. The key polyphenols having Anti‐Alzheimer's properties are depicted in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

Summary of important polyphenols with anti‐Alzheimer's properties, highlighting their sources, mechanisms, and key findings.

Polyphenol Source Mechanism of action Key findings References
Resveratrol Grapes, red wine Inhibits Aβ aggregation, reduces oxidative stress, anti‐inflammatory Reduced Aβ plaques, improved cognitive function in AD models Wang et al. (2018)
Curcumin Turmeric Anti‐inflammatory, antioxidant, inhibits Aβ and tau aggregation Reduced Aβ plaques and tau tangles, improved memory in animal models Liu et al. (2020)
EGCG Green tea Inhibits tau fibrillization, antioxidant, reduces Aβ toxicity Prevented tau aggregation, reduced oxidative stress in AD models Mandel et al. (2011)
Quercetin Apples, onions Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation Reduced Aβ‐induced toxicity, improved synaptic plasticity Sabogal‐Guáqueta et al. (2015)
Catechins Green tea Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ and tau aggregation Reduced Aβ plaques, improved cognitive function in AD models Weinreb et al. (2009)
Ferulic Acid Whole grains, coffee Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation Reduced oxidative stress and Aβ plaques, improved memory in AD mice Yan et al. (2023)
Apigenin Parsley, celery Anti‐inflammatory, antioxidant, promotes neurogenesis Reduced neuroinflammation, enhanced cognitive function in AD models Zhao, Wang, Liu, et al. (2013)
Luteolin Celery, peppers Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation Reduced Aβ‐induced toxicity, improved synaptic plasticity Jang et al. (2010)
Genistein Soybeans Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation Reduced Aβ plaques, improved memory in AD mice Bagheri et al. (2011)
Kaempferol Broccoli, tea Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation Reduced oxidative stress and Aβ toxicity, improved cognitive function Chen et al. (2018)
Oleuropein Olive oil Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation Reduced Aβ plaques, improved memory in AD models Luccarini et al. (2015)
Pterostilbene Blueberries Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation Reduced Aβ plaques, improved cognitive function in AD models Chang et al. (2012)
Anthocyanins Berries Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation Reduced oxidative stress and Aβ toxicity, improved memory in AD models Shih et al. (2011)
Rosmarinic Acid Rosemary, sage Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation Reduced Aβ plaques, improved cognitive function in AD models Habtemariam (2016)
Fisetin Strawberries, apples Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, promotes neurogenesis Reduced Aβ‐induced toxicity, improved synaptic plasticity Maher (2009)

5.5. Anti‐Alzheimer Potential of Resveratrol

Resveratrol, a naturally occurring polyphenol found in grapes, red wine, and berries, has garnered significant attention in targeting AD through multiple mechanisms, including inhibition of Aβ aggregation, attenuation of tau pathology, suppression of oxidative stress, and reduction of neuroinflammation. It facilitate Aβ clearance by upregulating neprilysin expression and activating autophagy, while also inhibiting tau hyperphosphorylation via modulation of kinases such as GSK‐3β (El‐Sayed and Bayan 2015; Sánchez‐Melgar et al. 2022). Furthermore, resveratrol exhibits potent antioxidant activity by scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS), enhancing endogenous antioxidant defenses, and chelating neurotoxic metal ions, thereby preserving neuronal integrity (Arbo et al. 2020). Its anti‐inflammatory effects are mediated through suppression of microglial and astrocytic activation, reduced release of pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐1β and TNF‐α, and inhibition of NF‐κB signaling, all of which help mitigate the chronic neuroinflammation implicated in AD progression (Capiralla et al. 2012).

In addition to neuroprotection, resveratrol supports synaptic plasticity, mitochondrial function, and neurogenesis, contributing to cognitive enhancement in animal models (Moussa et al. 2017). Furthermore, (Zhang et al. 2023) highlighted the therapeutic potential of three natural compounds—hamamelitannin, flavokawain A, and triacetyl resveratrol demonstrating—their dual anti‐colon cancer and neuroprotective activities through molecular docking studies, which revealed strong binding affinities to critical targets like BACE1 and CDK8. Complementing these findings, (Pan et al. 2014) reported that resveratrol derivatives possessed multi‐target neuroprotective activities, including potent inhibition of AChE and BuChE (IC50 as low as 0.32 μM), suppression of Aβ1–42 aggregation, and monoamine oxidase inhibition (IC50 down to 1.75 μM), significantly outperforming native resveratrol and suggesting enhanced efficacy against Alzheimer's pathology. Similarly, (Ozpak and Bağca 2024) demonstrated that resveratrol modulates the PI3K/Akt/GSK‐3β signaling pathway and reduces the expression of MMP‐2 and MMP‐9, key mediators of neuroinflammation thereby attenuating neuronal damage and reinforcing its neurotherapeutic potential. Further expanding on resveratrol's scaffold, (Tang et al. 2019) synthesized isoprenylated dimer derivatives, identifying compound 6c as a particularly promising candidate due to its strong inhibition of Aβ42 aggregation (IC50 = 7.56 μM), AChE activity (IC50 = 0.69 μM), and oxidative stress protection in SH‐SY5Y cells, along with confirmed blood–brain barrier permeability. Collectively, these findings emphasize the multifunctional therapeutic potential of resveratrol and its derivatives in targeting key pathways involved in neurodegenerative diseases, supporting a multi‐target drug development approach. Figure 2 shows the potential polyphenols combat via suppressing the pathological hallmarks of AD.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Represents the potential of polyphenols in mitigating pathological features of Alzheimer's disease.

5.6. Anti‐Alzheimer Potential of Curcumin

Curcumin, a polyphenolic compound derived from turmeric ( Curcuma longa ), demonstrates significant anti‐Alzheimer's potential through its multi‐targeted actions on hallmark pathological features of AD. Curcumin effectively scavenges ROS and enhances endogenous antioxidant enzymes, thereby mitigating oxidative stress, a key driver of neuronal damage in AD (Butterfield et al. 2023). It also inhibits the formation and aggregation of Aβ plaques by binding to Aβ peptides and promoting their clearance, as demonstrated in preclinical studies (Lv et al. 2023). Furthermore, it attenuates tau hyperphosphorylation, preventing neurofibrillary tangle formation and associated neurodegeneration (Zempel et al. 2013). Its anti‐inflammatory properties suppress microglial and astrocyte activation, inhibit NF‐κB signaling, and lower pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐1β and TNF‐α, thereby alleviating chronic neuroinflammation that exacerbates AD pathology (McGrattan et al. 2019). Additionally, curcumin promotes synaptic plasticity, neurogenesis, and mitochondrial function, supporting cognitive health (Spencer 2020).

Advances in curcumin derivatives, such as steroidal and dimethylaminomethyl‐substituted analogues, have enhanced neuroprotective efficacy by improving bioavailability and multi‐target engagement, demonstrating dose‐dependent cognitive improvements and inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and Aβ aggregation in animal models (Elmegeed et al. 2015; Fang et al. 2014). Synergistic effects with probiotics like Lactobacillus rhamnosus further potentiate curcumin's benefits in memory and oxidative stress reduction (Patel et al. 2020). Moreover, novel bivalent and hybrid curcumin compounds show superior membrane integration and multi‐pathway inhibition, enhancing their therapeutic promise (Ausili et al. 2021; Chainoglou et al. 2020). Additionally, nanotechnology based delivery systems, such as curcumin‐loaded lipid nanocarriers, significantly improve brain targeting and efficacy, reducing Aβ pathology, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation more effectively than free curcumin (Far et al. 2024). Collectively, these research advancements underscore curcumin's robust neuroprotective profile and its potential as a natural, multi‐faceted therapeutic agent for AD, with ongoing clinical studies focused on optimizing delivery and dosing strategies to overcome bioavailability challenges and maximize clinical benefits.

5.7. Anti‐Alzheimer Potential of Quercetin

Quercetin, a naturally abundant flavonoid found in apples, berries, onions, and tea, has shown significant promise for its multifaceted neuroprotective effects against AD. Its potent antioxidant activity helps to neutralize the ROS and enhance endogenous antioxidant defenses, reducing oxidative damage to neurons, a key driver of AD progression (Butterfield and Halliwell 2019). It was reported that quercetin also inhibits the formation and aggregation of Aβ plaques by modulating the cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) and promoting Aβ clearance (Ansari et al. 2009). Additionally, it attenuates tau hyperphosphorylation, preventing the formation of neurofibrillary tangles, another hallmark of AD pathology. Its anti‐inflammatory effects are mediated through the suppression of NF‐κB and MAPK signaling pathways, leading to reduced production of pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐1β and TNF‐α, and inhibition of microglial activation (Chiang et al. 2023). Beyond these actions, quercetin improves synaptic plasticity, promotes neurogenesis, and improves mitochondrial function, collectively enhancing cognitive health and neuronal survival (Grewal et al. 2021). Preclinical studies across diverse models, including zebrafish and rodent systems, consistently demonstrate quercetin's efficacy in improving memory, learning, and behavioral outcomes (Jangdey et al. 2018; Mani et al. 2018). Recent advancements in quercetin derivatives, such as quercetin‐1,2,3‐triazole hybrids, have shown enhanced cholinesterase inhibition and antioxidant activity, surpassing standard drugs like galantamine, thus highlighting quercetin's potential in multitarget AD therapy (Carreiro et al. 2023). Additionally, quercetin's modulation of neuronal microRNAs and downregulation of key enzymes like BACE1 further underscores its molecular‐level benefits in reducing amyloidogenesis and improving neuronal function (Al‐Sawasany et al. 2025; Qi et al. 2020). Collectively, these findings position quercetin as a promising natural compound for both preventive and therapeutic strategies against AD, acting through antioxidative, anti‐amyloidogenic, anti‐inflammatory, and neurogenic mechanisms.

5.8. Anti‐Alzheimer Potential of Kaempferol

Kaempferol, a natural flavonoid found in foods like tea, broccoli, and apples, has shown significant promise in combating AD. Kaempferol mitigates AD pathology in patients via potent antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and anti‐amyloidogenic actions (M Calderón‐Montaño et al. 2011). It also inhibits the aggregation of amyloid‐beta (Aβ) peptides and hyperphosphorylated tau protein—hallmarks of AD—by modulating kinases like GSK‐3β, thus preventing plaque and tangle formation (Rahul and Siddique 2021). Its anti‐inflammatory efficacy is evidenced by the suppression of microglial and astrocytic activation and downregulation of pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐1β and TNF‐α via NF‐κB pathway inhibition (Chen et al. 2022). Beyond these, kaempferol promotes synaptic plasticity, neurogenesis, and mitochondrial function, enhancing cognitive performance (Alrumaihi et al. 2024).

Studies in rodents and Drosophila models have confirmed its ability to reverse memory deficits and reduce neurodegeneration at doses ranging from 10 to 50 mg/kg or 10 μM (Babaei et al. 2021; Dong et al. 2023; Kim et al. 2010). Importantly, its therapeutic efficacy is amplified when co‐administered with borneol, which enhances kaempferol's blood brain barrier permeability and central nervous system bioavailability (Zhang et al. 2015). Polyherbal formulations containing kaempferol and quercetin have also shown synergistic effects in reducing oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and cognitive decline in AD models (Alexander et al. 2023). Moreover, kaempferol enriched plant extracts exhibit significant cholinesterase inhibition, highlighting their potential in symptomatic management of AD (Chukwuma et al. 2023). Collectively, these findings substantiate kaempferol's therapeutic promise as a safe, multifactorial candidate for both prevention and treatment of Alzheimer's disease by targeting oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, amyloid pathology, and neuronal dysfunction.

5.9. Anti‐Alzheimer Potential of Naringenin

Naringenin, a citrus derived bioactive flavonoid, has emerged as a promising neurotherapeutic candidate for AD, owing to its multifaceted mechanisms targeting key pathological features against pathological disorder. Extensive preclinical research has demonstrated that naringenin modulates critical pathways involved in AD progression, including amyloid‐β (Aβ) deposition, tau hyperphosphorylation, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction. It exhibits potent antioxidant properties by enhancing endogenous defense systems, thereby mitigating oxidative neuronal damage a central event in AD pathogenesis (Heo et al. 2004). Furthermore, naringenin interferes with Aβ plaque formation by regulating amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing, reducing Aβ production, and preventing tau hyperphosphorylation, thereby safeguarding neurons from aggregation‐induced toxicity (D'Egidio et al. 2025). In parallel, it exhibits anti‐inflammatory actions by suppressing microglial activation and downregulating pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐1β and TNF‐α, attenuating the chronic neuroinflammation implicated in neuronal degeneration (Yang et al. 2014). Beyond its anti‐oxidative and anti‐inflammatory effects, naringenin promotes synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis, essential for maintaining cognitive performance, and supports mitochondrial function, which is often compromised in AD, thereby alleviating neuronal energy deficits (Davinelli et al. 2023).

Multiple in vivo studies corroborate naringenin's therapeutic efficacy in AD animal models. For instance (Ghofrani et al. 2015) reported significant improvements in learning and memory in rats administered 50 mg/kg/day of naringenin, highlighting its modulation of neuroprotective signaling pathways. Similarly, (Khan et al. 2012) demonstrated that oral administration of naringenin at 50 mg/kg body weight improved cognitive performance, reduced oxidative markers, and alleviated neuroinflammation in intracerebroventricular streptozotocin (ICV‐STZ)‐induced AD models (Ma, Yang, et al. 2013a). Furthermore, further confirmed these neuroprotective effects by showing reduced Aβ deposition and neuroinflammation following naringenin treatment (Zhu et al. 2024). Additionally, contemporary studies demonstrated the role of naringin in modulating neurodegenerative pathways by improving mitochondrial integrity and reducing neuroinflammatory markers, thereby enhancing memory and neuronal survival (Meng et al. 2021; Sachdeva et al. 2014).

Advanced pharmacological approaches have further elevated the therapeutic promise of naringenin. It was reported that well‐designed biomimetic nano‐drug delivery system encapsulating naringeninsignificantly enhanced blood–brain barrier permeability and neuronal uptake (Yang et al. 2014). However, the reduction of the administrative dose (20 mg/kg) of this nanoformulation alleviated cognitive deficits, suppressed Aβ pathology, and reduced neuroinflammation more efficiently than conventional delivery methods (Yang et al. 2014). Similarly, (Wu et al. 2021) synthesized novel naringenin carbamate derivatives, with compound 5 g exhibiting potent acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition (IC50 = 0.42 μM), antioxidant activity, and metal chelating properties, leading to the mitigation of the adverse effects of AD pathology. Furthermore, computational studies revealed that naringenin showed high binding affinity (9.5 kcal/mol) for collapsin response mediator protein‐2 (CRMP‐2), an AD‐related target, along with favorable BBB permeability, reinforcing its drug‐like properties (Lawal et al. 2018). The therapeutic relevance of naringenin and related polyphenols is further summarized in Table 3.

TABLE 3.

Summary of studies showing the anti‐Alzheimer potential of selected polyphenols.

Polyphenol Mechanism of action Study findings References
Resveratrol Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation, promotes Aβ clearance Reduced Aβ levels and improved cognitive function in AD mouse models. Capiralla et al. (2012)
Resveratrol Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation, promotes Aβ clearance Suppressed microglial activation and reduced pro‐inflammatory cytokines in vitro. Zhang et al. (2021)
Resveratrol Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation, promotes Aβ clearance Enhanced synaptic plasticity and memory in aged rats. Granzotto and Zatta (2011)
Curcumin Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ and tau aggregation, chelates metal ions Reduced Aβ plaque burden and improved memory in AD transgenic mice. Yang et al. (2005)
Curcumin Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ and tau aggregation, chelates metal ions Inhibited tau phosphorylation and fibrillization in cell models. Ma, Zuo, et al. (2013b)
Curcumin Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ and tau aggregation, chelates metal ions Attenuated oxidative stress and inflammation in AD patients. Ringman et al. (2012)
Quercetin Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation, enhances mitochondrial function Reduced Aβ‐induced toxicity and improved neuronal survival in vitro. Ansari et al. (2009)
Quercetin Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation, enhances mitochondrial function Decreased oxidative stress and improved cognitive performance in AD mice. Sabogal‐Guáqueta et al. (2015)
Quercetin Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation, enhances mitochondrial function Enhanced autophagy and reduced tau pathology in cell models. Godoy et al. (2017)
Kaempferol Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation, promotes autophagy Reduced Aβ‐induced neurotoxicity and improved memory in AD mice. Jafari et al. (2022)
Kaempferol Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation, promotes autophagy Inhibited tau phosphorylation and aggregation in neuronal cells. Kim et al. (2018)
Kaempferol Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation, promotes autophagy Attenuated oxidative stress and inflammation in AD models. Devi et al. (2015)
Naringenin Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation, enhances synaptic plasticity Reduced Aβ levels and improved cognitive function in AD mice. Heo et al. (2004)
Naringenin Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation, enhances synaptic plasticity Inhibited tau hyperphosphorylation and improved neuronal survival in vitro. Ghofrani et al. (2015)
Naringenin Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, inhibits Aβ aggregation, enhances synaptic plasticity Enhanced mitochondrial function and reduced oxidative stress in AD models. Zbarsky et al. (2005)

6. In Silico Support by Molecular Docking and Network Pharmacology Study

The study employed a systematic and multi‐step computational approach to identify and evaluate polyphenols with potential therapeutic effects against AD. Initially, a comprehensive dataset of 651 polyphenols was curated from Dr. Duke's Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Database (https://phytochem.nal.usda.gov/chemical‐polyphenols) (Duke 1994). After removing 62 duplicates, 589 unique polyphenolic compounds were retained for further analysis. From these, the top 13 molecules were selected based on their strong antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and anti‐AD properties, as evidenced by prior research or computational predictions. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms of these polyphenols, their protein targets were identified using the SuperPred database, which provided UniProt IDs, and the STRING database, which facilitated the mapping of target gene names. The GeneCards database was utilized to predict AD‐associated genes, enabling the identification of potential therapeutic targets (https://www.genecards.org/). Pathway analysis was conducted using Cytoscape‐v3.10.3 software to visualize complex interactions and signaling pathways involved in AD pathogenesis.

For molecular docking studies, the three‐dimensional structure of the target protein (PDB ID: 1UV5) was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (https://www.rcsb.org/), a repository maintained by the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB). This particular PDB entry was selected based on its X‐ray crystallographic origin, favorable resolution (< 2.8 Å), and high percentile scores in global validation metrics, indicating superior structural quality. Prior to docking, the protein structure was preprocessed using PyMOL software (version 2.5) (DeLano 2002) to remove water molecules, add missing hydrogen atoms, and prepare the structure for subsequent analysis. The protein was prepared using the Protein Preparation Wizard in Maestro 12.5, followed by grid generation to define the binding site (Buzdar et al. 2025). Ligand preparation was performed to optimize the polyphenol structures for docking using software Maestro 12.5. Molecular docking was carried out to predict binding affinities and interactions between the polyphenols and the target protein. The docking results were analyzed, and the top‐scoring complexes were visualized in 2D and 3D using Discovery Studio 2024 to interpret binding modes and interactions at the molecular level (Zareei et al. 2024). This integrated approach combined cheminformatics, bioinformatics, and molecular modeling to identify promising polyphenolic candidates for AD therapy, providing a robust framework for further experimental validation.

The polyphenolic compounds depicted in Figure 3 represent a multifaceted approach in combating AD by targeting its core pathological pathways, including oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, Aβ aggregation, and tau pathology. These bioactive molecules exhibit diverse and overlapping mechanisms of action, positioning them as strong candidates for multi‐target drug development. These results supported by (Sharifi‐Rad et al. 2022), who emphasize the broad spectrum efficacy of phytochemicals such as curcumin (80–500 mg/day), resveratrol (150–500 mg/day), quercetin (500–1000 mg/day), and (EGCG; 300–400 mg/day), highlighting their roles in modulating oxidative and inflammatory pathways, as well as Aβ and tau pathology. These compounds exert antioxidative effects by upregulating endogenous antioxidant systems Nrf2/ARE pathway, attenuate neuroinflammation by inhibiting NF‐κB, and interfere with amyloid fibril formation and tau phosphorylation. Building upon this, (Jin‐Feng et al. 2025) provide additional evidence supporting the multi target potential of these polyphenols in preclinical models. In their study, curcumin (100 mg/kg/day), resveratrol (30 mg/kg/day), and EGCG (50 mg/kg/day) were shown to significantly mitigate AD‐related pathology in animal models through a synergistic mechanism involving oxidative stress reduction, neuroinflammatory suppression, and inhibition of β‐amyloid aggregation.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Chemical structures of selected polyphenolic compounds exhibiting neuroprotective potential against Alzheimer's disease (Created by ChemDraw Office).

6.1. Therapeutic Targets of Polyphenols Against Alzheimer's Disease

The polyphenolic compounds exhibit their therapeutic potential in Alzheimer's disease (AD) by interacting with a diverse array of molecular targets, including enzymes, receptors, and signaling pathways, to modulate oxidative stress, inflammation, and neurodegeneration. For instance, Gallic acid, a phenolic acid with strong antioxidant properties, targets the NFKB1 gene, regulating pathways involved in oxidative stress and inflammation (Thottappillil et al. 2024). Similarly, Caffeic Acid interacts with Xanthine Dehydrogenase (XDH) to mitigate oxidative damage (Iraz et al. 2006), while curcumin, known for its neuroprotective and anti‐inflammatory effects, targets CYP19A1 and NFKB1, influencing estrogen metabolism and inflammatory responses (Azzini et al. 2024). Myricetin inhibits Arachidonate 12‐Lipoxygenase (ALOX12), modulating inflammatory pathways and protein degradation (Jang et al. 2020), whereas Apigenin targets SRC and ESR1, impacting cell signaling and hormone regulation (Zhao, Wang, Wang, et al. 2013). Quercetin interacts with DPP4 and HTR2C, affecting metabolic and neurological processes (Khan et al. 2019; Zaplatic et al. 2019), while Kaempferol and Luteolin target MMP1 and MMP2, involved in inflammation and tissue remodeling (Alexander et al. 2023). Additionally, (Arul et al. 2012) naringenin modulates SHBG and RORB, regulating hormone activity and circadian rhythms (Figure 4A). These interactions highlight the multifaceted mechanisms by which polyphenols exert their therapeutic effects, targeting key pathological processes in AD, including oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction, thereby offering a promising avenue for therapeutic intervention.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Network analysis of polyphenolic compounds targeting genes relevant to Alzheimer's disease. (A) Network of polyphenolic compounds and their diverse molecular targets like, enzymes, receptors, and signaling pathways. (B) Molecular pathways targeted by polyphenolic compound genes. (C) Shortest targeted pathway of polyphenolic compounds. (D) Venn diagram showing overlap between polyphenol‐targeted genes and Alzheimer's Disease‐Related Genes. (E) Protein–protein interaction network of key targeted pathway components.

The complex gene interaction network in Figure 4B illustrates the common pathways through which polyphenolic compounds like Myricetin, Luteolin, Kaempferol, Caffeic Acid, Quercetin, Apigenin, Curcumin, and Ferulic Acid exert their therapeutic effects against Alzheimer's disease (AD). These compounds target key genes such as SLC2A1, ESR1, NFE2L2, NFKB1, MAOA, CYP1B1, AKR1B1, MMP9, TTR, CYP19A1, DPP4, HSD17B10, PIK3CA, PIK3CB, XDH, KDR, SRC, TOP2A, and GLO1, which are involved in critical AD‐related processes. For instance, NFE2L2 regulates oxidative stress (Chandran et al. 2023), MAOA and TTR are linked to neurodegeneration, NFKB1 modulates inflammation, and PIK3CA and SRC influence cellular signaling pathways (Long et al. 2021; Sousa et al. 2004). Notably, Curcumin targets NFKB1 and the TNF pathway to suppress inflammation (Wu et al. 2022), while Quercetin and Myricetin interact with CYP1B1 and AKR1B1 to mitigate oxidative stress damage (Wang et al. 2024; Zaplatic et al. 2019). These interactions highlight the ability of polyphenols to simultaneously address multiple pathological mechanisms in AD, including oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration, underscoring their potential as multi‐target therapeutic agents for AD.

Figure 4C illustrates the shortest pathway through which polyphenolic compounds Gallic acid, Myricetin, Quercetin, Apigenin, and Kaempferol interact with key molecular targets, Hydroxysteroid 17‐Beta Dehydrogenase 10 (HSD17B10) and Transthyretin (TTR), to exert their therapeutic effects. HSD17B10, critical for mitochondrial function and neurodegeneration (He et al. 2023), and TTR, associated with amyloidosis, are modulated by these compounds to regulate pathways linked to inflammation, oxidative stress, and protein aggregation (Eze 2024; Stefani and Rigacci 2013). By targeting these pathways, the polyphenols mitigate oxidative damage, prevent protein misfolding, and reduce neuroinflammation, offering significant therapeutic benefits for neurodegenerative and metabolic disorders. This streamlined interaction highlights the potential of polyphenols to address multiple pathological mechanisms simultaneously, underscoring their promise as multi‐target agents in combating complex diseases like AD.

Moreover, results show a significant overlap between polyphenolic compounds and Alzheimer's disease (AD) at the molecular level, with 49 genes (29.3%) associated with polyphenols and 110 genes (65.9%) linked to AD, including 8 common genes (4.8%) (Figure 4D). Key genes such as Matrix Metallopeptidase 2 (MMP2), Estrogen Receptor 1 (ESR1), and Solute Carrier Family 2 Member 1 (SLC2A1) were identified as central to protein–protein interactions, regulating pathways critical for neurodegeneration, inflammation, and oxidative stress. MMP2 is implicated in inflammation and tissue remodeling (Rivera et al. 2019), SLC2A1 in glucose transport and neuronal energy metabolism, and ESR1 in neuroprotection and hormone regulation (Tian et al. 2024). These interactions suggest that polyphenolic compounds may collectively target core AD mechanisms, including neuroinflammation, tau phosphorylation, and amyloid‐beta aggregation. The findings highlight the strong potential of polyphenols in mitigating AD progression by modulating these pathways, as illustrated in Figure 4E, providing a promising foundation for further therapeutic development.

6.2. Molecular Docking Analysis of Polyphenols With Alzheimer's Disease Targets

The molecular docking results demonstrate that polyphenolic compounds, including Myricetin, Luteolin, Kaempferol, Caffeic Acid, Quercetin, Apigenin, Curcumin, and Ferulic Acid, effectively inhibit the ATP‐binding region of glycogen synthase kinase‐3 beta (GSK3‐β), a key enzyme implicated in AD pathology (Zareei et al. 2024). These compounds form specific hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions with critical amino acid residues in the ATP‐binding pocket, such as ASN A:64, VAL A:135, ASP A:133, ILE A:62, LYS A:85, and GLU A:97 (Mou et al. 2020). For instance, Myricetin interacts with ASN A:64, ASN A:186, ASP A:133, and VAL A:135 (Murugan et al. 2024), while Quercetin binds to VAL A:135, ILE A:62, LYS A:85, and GLU A:97 (Rani et al. 2024). These interactions stabilize the inactive conformation of GSK3‐β, preventing its hyperactivity, which is associated with tau hyperphosphorylation and neurofibrillary tangle formation (Figure 5a–h). The consistent involvement of residues like VAL A:135 and ASN A:64 across multiple compounds suggests their critical role in the binding mechanism. These findings highlight the potential of polyphenols as GSK3‐β inhibitors, offering a promising therapeutic strategy to modulate tau pathology and mitigate AD progression (Figure 5a–h). Previously, (Youn et al. 2023) demonstrated that marine derived bioactive compounds target multiple AD related pathways, including AChE inhibition, suppression of amyloid‐beta aggregation, and NF‐κB signaling modulation to overcome the AD related pathology. Notably, dieckol demonstrated strong binding affinity to AChE (binding energy: 9.6 kcal/mol) and β‐secretase (BACE1), suggesting its potential as a lead compound. Furthermore, results demonstrate that Glycogen synthase kinase 3‐beta (GSK3‐β), a key enzyme implicated in AD due to its role in tau protein hyperphosphorylation, can be effectively targeted by polyphenolic compounds. Findings of molecular docking using Maestro software revealed that Myricetin, Luteolin, Kaempferol, Caffeic Acid, Quercetin, Apigenin, Curcumin, and Ferulic Acid exhibit strong binding affinities to GSK3‐β (PDB ID: 1UV5), with docking scores ranging from −11.8 kcal/mol (Myricetin) to −8.67 kcal/mol (Ferulic Acid) (Figure 5i). Myricetin showed the highest docking score, indicating superior binding potential, while Apigenin exhibited the highest energy binding capability. The Glide RMSD values for all compounds were consistent, suggesting stable and reliable docking conformations. These findings highlight the potential of these polyphenols to inhibit GSK3‐β hyperactivity, thereby reducing tau hyperphosphorylation and improving cognitive functions in AD models. This supports their therapeutic potential as natural inhibitors for AD treatment.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Showing the 3D and 2D interaction of molecular docking analysis of polyphenols with glycogen synthase kinase 3‐beta (GSK3‐β). (a) Myricetin‐GSK3‐β Docking. (b) Luteolin‐GSK3‐β Docking. (c) Kaempferol‐GSK3‐β docking. (d) Caffeic Acid‐GSK3‐β Docking. (e) Quercetin‐GSK3‐β Docking. (f) Apigenin‐GSK3‐β Docking. (g) Curcumin‐GSK3‐β Docking. (h) Ferulic Acid‐GSK3‐β Docking. (i) Docking Scores (kcal/mol).

7. Limitation and Future Research Directions

Despite the well‐documented neuroprotective effects of natural polyphenols, several critical limitations hinder their clinical translation in AD therapy. A major barrier is their poor bioavailability, attributed to rapid metabolism, limited systemic retention, and restricted penetration of the blood–brain barrier, necessitating the development of advanced delivery platforms such as nanoformulations, liposomes, or prodrugs to enhance central nervous system targeting (Iqbal et al. 2021). Additionally, the inter‐individual variability in gut microbiota composition significantly influences polyphenol biotransformation into bioactive metabolites, complicating the prediction of therapeutic outcomes and impeding the standardization of treatments (Cardona et al. 2013). The multifactorial nature of AD also poses a challenge, as polyphenols may not sufficiently address all pathological pathways simultaneously. Another limitation lies in the scarcity of well‐designed, long‐term, randomized controlled trials; current studies are often constrained by small cohorts, short durations, and inconsistent formulations, limiting their reproducibility and translational relevance (Vauzour et al. 2010). To overcome these challenges, future research should integrate computational tools to refine drug development and mechanistic insights. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using platforms like GROMACS or AMBER can elucidate the stability and interaction dynamics of polyphenol candidates (curcumin, EGCG, resveratrol) with AD‐related targets such as amyloid‐β, tau protein, and acetylcholinesterase, leveraging crystallographic data from PDB entries (Gheidari et al. 2024). Concurrently, machine learning (ML) algorithms such as deep neural networks and random forest models can predict absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) profiles, neuroprotective efficacy, and off‐target interactions by mining large‐scale omics and pharmacological datasets (Phatak et al. 2009). Moreover, multi‐center, longitudinal clinical trials employing standardized polyphenol formulations are essential to validate efficacy and safety. Addressing these multifaceted gaps through integrative, interdisciplinary strategies may unlock the full therapeutic potential of polyphenols in combating AD pathogenesis.

8. Conclusions

In conclusion, polyphenols exhibit promising neuroprotective potential against Alzheimer's disease through their multifaceted roles in mitigating oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, amyloid‐beta aggregation, and tau hyperphosphorylation. By modulating critical signaling pathways such as NF‐κB, Nrf2/ARE, and PI3K/Akt, polyphenols contribute to neuronal survival, synaptic plasticity, and cognitive preservation. The therapeutic efficacy of key polyphenolic compounds such as curcumin, resveratrol, EGCG, and quercetin has been supported by in vitro, in vivo, and emerging in silico studies that elucidate their target interactions and pharmacokinetics. In silico approaches, including molecular docking and ADMET profiling, offer valuable insights into the bioavailability, blood brain barrier permeability, and binding affinity of polyphenols to pathological targets in AD. However, despite compelling experimental and computational evidence, clinical translation remains limited due to challenges in bioavailability, standardization, and long‐term efficacy. Therefore, integrating polyphenol based interventions with advanced drug delivery systems and precision medicine strategies, guided by in silico modeling, may accelerate their development as adjunctive or preventive therapies for AD. Further interdisciplinary research is warranted to validate their therapeutic promise and bridge the gap between laboratory findings and clinical application.

Author Contributions

Guifei Chen: conceptualization (equal), writing – original draft (equal). Yan Su: data curation (equal), methodology (equal), writing – review and editing (equal). Siyu Chen: formal analysis (equal), software (equal), writing – review and editing (equal). Tiandong Lin: formal analysis (equal), validation (equal), writing – review and editing (equal). Xueying Lin: conceptualization (equal), supervision (equal), writing – review and editing (equal).

Ethics Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

Consent

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Chen, G. , Su Y., Chen S., Lin T., and Lin X.. 2025. “Polyphenols and Alzheimer's Disease: A Review on Molecular and Therapeutic Insights With In Silico Support.” Food Science & Nutrition 13, no. 9: e70496. 10.1002/fsn3.70496.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Contributor Information

Tiandong Lin, Email: tdonglin23@outlook.com.

Xueying Lin, Email: lxy_574081278@163.com.

Data Availability Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

References

  1. Alagawany, M. , Abd El‐Hack M. E., Saeed M., et al. 2020. “Nutritional Applications and Beneficial Health Applications of Green Tea and l‐Theanine in Some Animal Species: A Review.” Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 104: 245–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, C. , Parsaee A., and Vasefi M.. 2023. “Polyherbal and Multimodal Treatments: Kaempferol‐And Quercetin‐Rich Herbs Alleviate Symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease.” Biology 12: 1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alrumaihi, F. , Almatroodi S. A., Alharbi H. O. A., et al. 2024. “Pharmacological Potential of Kaempferol, a Flavonoid in the Management of Pathogenesis via Modulation of Inflammation and Other Biological Activities.” Molecules 29: 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Al‐Sawasany, A. S. , Fayed H. M., Mahmoud B. F., Elblehi S. S., and Ghazal N. A.. 2025. “Evaluation of the Neurotherapeutic Effect of Quercetin on Neuronal miR‐124 and β‐Site Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleaving Enzyme 1 (BACE1) in an Experimental Alzheimer's Disease Model.” Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology 39: e70290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alzheimer's Association . 2023. “2023 Alzheimer's Disease Facts and Figures.” Alzheimer's Association Report 19: 1598–1695. 10.1002/alz.13016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Andrade, S. , Ramalho M. J., Pereira M. D. C., and Loureiro J. A.. 2018. “Resveratrol Brain Delivery for Neurological Disorders Prevention and Treatment.” Frontiers in Pharmacology 9: 1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ansari, M. A. , Abdul H. M., Joshi G., Opii W. O., and Butterfield D. A.. 2009. “Protective Effect of Quercetin in Primary Neurons Against Aβ (1–42): Relevance to Alzheimer's Disease.” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 20: 269–275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Arain, M. A. , Khaskheli G. B., Barham G. S., and Marghazani I. B.. 2024. “Lactoferrin's Role in Modulating NF‐κB Pathway to Alleviate Diabetes‐Associated Inflammation: A Novel In‐Silico Study.” Heliyon 10: e34051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Arain, M. A. , Khaskheli G. B., Shah A. H., et al. 2023. “Nutritional Significance and Promising Therapeutic/Medicinal Application of Camel Milk as a Functional Food in Human and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.” Animal Biotechnology 34: 1988–2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Arain, M. A. , Mei Z., Hassan F., et al. 2018. “Lycopene: A Natural Antioxidant for Prevention of Heat‐Induced Oxidative Stress in Poultry.” World's Poultry Science Journal 74: 89–100. [Google Scholar]
  11. Arbo, B. D. , André‐Miral C., Nasre‐Nasser R. G., et al. 2020. “Resveratrol Derivatives as Potential Treatments for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 12: 103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Arul, D. , Subramanian P., and Jayakumar M.. 2012. “Protective Role of Naringenin on Circadian Rhythms of Liver Marker Enzymes During N‐Nitrosodiethylamine Induced Hepatocarcinogenesis in Rats.” Biological Rhythm Research 43: 103–111. [Google Scholar]
  13. As, A. 2023. “2023 Alzheimer's Disease Facts and Figures.” Alzheimer's & Dementia 19: 1598–1695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ashraf, G. M. , Greig N. H., Khan T. A., et al. 2014. “Protein Misfolding and Aggregation in Alzheimer's Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.” CNS & Neurological Disorders‐Drug Targets‐CNS & Neurological Disorders 13: 1280–1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ashraf, M. F. , Zubair D., Bashir M. N., et al. 2024. “Nutraceutical and Health‐Promoting Potential of Lactoferrin, an Iron‐Binding Protein in Human and Animal: Current Knowledge.” Biological Trace Element Research 202: 56–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ataie, A. , Sabetkasaei M., Haghparast A., Moghaddam A. H., and Kazeminejad B.. 2010. “Neuroprotective Effects of the Polyphenolic Antioxidant Agent, Curcumin, Against Homocysteine‐Induced Cognitive Impairment and Oxidative Stress in the Rat.” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 96: 378–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ausili, A. , Gómez‐Murcia V., Candel A. M., et al. 2021. “A Comparison of the Location in Membranes of Curcumin and Curcumin‐Derived Bivalent Compounds With Potential Neuroprotective Capacity for Alzheimer's Disease.” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 199: 111525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Azzini, E. , Peña‐Corona S. I., Hernández‐Parra H., et al. 2024. “Neuroprotective and Anti‐Inflammatory Effects of Curcumin in Alzheimer's Disease: Targeting Neuroinflammation Strategies.” Phytotherapy Research 38: 3169–3189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Babaei, P. , Eyvani K., and Kouhestani S.. 2021. “Sex‐Independent Cognition Improvement in Response to Kaempferol in the Model of Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease.” Neurochemical Research 46: 1480–1486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bagheri, M. , Joghataei M.‐T., Mohseni S., and Roghani M.. 2011. “Genistein Ameliorates Learning and Memory Deficits in Amyloid β (1–40) Rat Model of Alzheimer's Disease.” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 95: 270–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Balogun, E. , Hoque M., Gong P., et al. 2003. “Curcumin Activates the Haem Oxygenase‐1 Gene via Regulation of Nrf2 and the Antioxidant‐Responsive Element.” Biochemical Journal 371: 887–895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bartus, R. T. , Dean R. L. III, Beer B., and Lippa A. S.. 1982. “The Cholinergic Hypothesis of Geriatric Memory Dysfunction.” Science 217: 408–414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Butterfield, D. A. , Boyd‐Kimball D., and Reed T. T.. 2023. “Cellular Stress Response (Hormesis) in Response to Bioactive Nutraceuticals With Relevance to Alzheimer Disease.” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 38: 643–669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Butterfield, D. A. , and Halliwell B.. 2019. “Oxidative Stress, Dysfunctional Glucose Metabolism and Alzheimer Disease.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 20: 148–160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Buzdar, J. A. , Shah Q. A., Khan M. Z., et al. 2025. “Hepatoprotective Effects of Olive Leaf Extract Against Carbon Tetrachloride‐Induced Oxidative Stress: In Vivo and In‐Silico Insights Into the Nrf2‐NFκB Pathway.” Journal of Molecular Histology 56: 1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Calderón‐Montaño, J. M. , Burgos‐Morón E., Pérez‐Guerrero C., and López‐Lázaro M.. 2011. “A Review on the Dietary Flavonoid Kaempferol.” Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry 11: 298–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Capiralla, H. , Vingtdeux V., Zhao H., et al. 2012. “Resveratrol Mitigates Lipopolysaccharide‐ and Aβ‐Mediated Microglial Inflammation by Inhibiting the TLR4/NF‐κB/STAT Signaling Cascade.” Journal of Neurochemistry 120: 461–472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cardona, F. , Andrés‐Lacueva C., Tulipani S., Tinahones F. J., and Queipo‐Ortuño M. I.. 2013. “Benefits of Polyphenols on Gut Microbiota and Implications in Human Health.” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 24: 1415–1422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Carreiro, E. P. , Costa A. R., Antunes C. M., et al. 2023. “Quercetin‐1, 2, 3‐Triazole Hybrids as Multifunctional Anti‐Alzheimer's Agents.” Molecules 28: 7495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Carrillo, J. Á. , Arcusa R., Xandri‐Martínez R., Cerdá B., Zafrilla P., and Marhuenda J.. 2025. “Impact of Polyphenol‐Rich Nutraceuticals on Cognitive Function and Neuroprotective Biomarkers: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trial.” Nutrients 17: 601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chainoglou, E. , Siskos A., Pontiki E., and Hadjipavlou‐Litina D.. 2020. “Hybridization of Curcumin Analogues With Cinnamic Acid Derivatives as Multi‐Target Agents Against Alzheimer's Disease Targets.” Molecules 25: 4958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Chandran, A. , Oliver H. J., and Rochet J.‐C.. 2023. “Role of NFE2L1 in the Regulation of Proteostasis: Implications for Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases.” Biology 12: 1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Chang, J. , Rimando A., Pallas M., et al. 2012. “Low‐Dose Pterostilbene, but Not Resveratrol, Is a Potent Neuromodulator in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease.” Neurobiology of Aging 33: 2062–2071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen, X. , Qian J., Wang L., et al. 2018. “Kaempferol Attenuates Hyperglycemia‐Induced Cardiac Injuries by Inhibiting Inflammatory Responses and Oxidative Stress.” Endocrine 60: 83–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen, Y. , Peng F., Xing Z., Chen J., Peng C., and Li D.. 2022. “Beneficial Effects of Natural Flavonoids on Neuroinflammation.” Frontiers in Immunology 13: 1006434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Cheng, Y.‐J. , Lin C.‐H., and Lane H.‐Y.. 2021. “Involvement of Cholinergic, Adrenergic, and Glutamatergic Network Modulation With Cognitive Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22: 2283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Chiang, M.‐C. , Tsai T.‐Y., and Wang C.‐J.. 2023. “The Potential Benefits of Quercetin for Brain Health: A Review of Anti‐Inflammatory and Neuroprotective Mechanisms.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24: 6328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Chukwuma, I. F. , Ezeorba T. P. C., Nworah F. N., Apeh V. O., Khalid M., and Sweilam S. H.. 2023. “Bioassay‐Guided Identification of Potential Alzheimer's Disease Therapeutic Agents From Kaempferol‐Enriched Fraction of Aframomum melegueta Seeds Using In Vitro and Chemoinformatics Approaches.” Arabian Journal of Chemistry 16: 105089. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cummings, J. , Lee G., Ritter A., Sabbagh M., and Zhong K.. 2019. “Alzheimer's Disease Drug Development Pipeline: 2019.” Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions 5: 272–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Cummings, J. , Lee G., Zhong K., Fonseca J., and Taghva K.. 2021. “Alzheimer's Disease Drug Development Pipeline: 2021.” Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions 7: e12179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Davinelli, S. , Medoro A., Ali S., Passarella D., Intrieri M., and Scapagnini G.. 2023. “Dietary Flavonoids and Adult Neurogenesis: Potential Implications for Brain Aging.” Current Neuropharmacology 21: 651–668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. D'Egidio, F. , Qosja E., Ammannito F., et al. 2025. “Antioxidant and Anti‐Inflammatory Defense in Huntington's Disease: Role of NRF2 and Pgc‐1α and Therapeutic Strategies.” Life (Basel) 15: 577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. DeLano, W. L. 2002. “Pymol: An Open‐Source Molecular Graphics Tool.” CCP4 Newsletter on Protein Crystallography 40: 82–92. [Google Scholar]
  44. Devi, K. P. , Malar D. S., Nabavi S. F., et al. 2015. “Kaempferol and Inflammation: From Chemistry to Medicine.” Pharmacological Research 99: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Dhakal, S. , Kushairi N., Phan C. W., Adhikari B., Sabaratnam V., and Macreadie I.. 2019. “Dietary Polyphenols: A Multifactorial Strategy to Target Alzheimer's Disease.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20: 5090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Di Meco, A. , Curtis M. E., Lauretti E., and Praticò D.. 2020. “Autophagy Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease: Mechanistic Insights and New Therapeutic Opportunities.” Biological Psychiatry 87: 797–807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Di Meo, F. , Valentino A., Petillo O., Peluso G., Filosa S., and Crispi S.. 2020. “Bioactive Polyphenols and Neuromodulation: Molecular Mechanisms in Neurodegeneration.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21: 2564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Dong, X. , Zhou S., and Nao J.. 2023. “Kaempferol as a Therapeutic Agent in Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence From Preclinical Studies.” Ageing Research Reviews 87: 101910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Du, H. , Sarwar I., Ahmad S., et al. 2024. “Organic Acids in Poultry Industry: A Review of Nutritional Advancements and Health Benefits.” World's Poultry Science Journal 80: 133–153. [Google Scholar]
  50. Duke, J. A. 1994. “Dr. Duke's Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Databases.”
  51. Elmegeed, G. A. , Ahmed H. H., Hashash M. A., Abd‐Elhalim M. M., and El‐Kady D. S.. 2015. “Synthesis of Novel Steroidal Curcumin Derivatives as Anti‐Alzheimer's Disease Candidates: Evidences‐Based on In Vivo Study.” Steroids 101: 78–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. El‐Sayed, N. S. , and Bayan Y.. 2015. Possible Role of Resveratrol Targeting Estradiol and Neprilysin Pathways in Lipopolysaccharide Model of Alzheimer Disease, 107–118. Springer. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Esposito, Z. , Belli L., Toniolo S., Sancesario G., Bianconi C., and Martorana A.. 2013. “Amyloid β, Glutamate, Excitotoxicity in Alzheimer's Disease: Are We on the Right Track?” CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 19: 549–555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Eze, F. N. 2024. “Transthyretin Amyloidosis: Role of Oxidative Stress and the Beneficial Implications of Antioxidants and Nutraceutical Supplementation.” Neurochemistry International 179: 105837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Fang, L. , Gou S., Liu X., Cao F., and Cheng L.. 2014. “Design, Synthesis and Anti‐Alzheimer Properties of Dimethylaminomethyl‐Substituted Curcumin Derivatives.” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 24: 40–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Far, B. F. , Safaei M., Pourmolaei A., et al. 2024. “Exploring Curcumin‐Loaded Lipid‐Based Nanomedicine as Efficient Targeted Therapy for Alzheimer's Diseases.” ACS Applied Bio Materials 7: 3535–3555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Fernandes, L. , Cardim‐Pires T. R., Foguel D., and Palhano F. L.. 2021. “Green Tea Polyphenol Epigallocatechin‐Gallate in Amyloid Aggregation and Neurodegenerative Diseases.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 15: 718188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Figueira, I. , Garcia G., Pimpão R. C., et al. 2017b. “Polyphenols Journey Through Blood‐Brain Barrier Towards Neuronal Protection.” Scientific Reports 7: 11456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Figueira, I. , Menezes R., Macedo D., Costa I., and Nunes dos Santos C.. 2017a. “Polyphenols Beyond Barriers: A Glimpse Into the Brain.” Current Neuropharmacology 15: 562–594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Fraga, C. G. , Galleano M., Verstraeten S. V., and Oteiza P. I.. 2010. “Basic Biochemical Mechanisms Behind the Health Benefits of Polyphenols.” Molecular Aspects of Medicine 31: 435–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Freyssin, A. , Page G., Fauconneau B., and Bilan A. R.. 2018. “Natural Polyphenols Effects on Protein Aggregates in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Prion‐Like Diseases.” Neural Regeneration Research 13: 955–961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Fuloria, S. , Mehta J., Chandel A., et al. 2022. “A Comprehensive Review on the Therapeutic Potential of Curcuma longa Linn. In Relation to Its Major Active Constituent Curcumin.” Frontiers in Pharmacology 13: 820806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. García‐Morales, V. , González‐Acedo A., Melguizo‐Rodríguez L., et al. 2021. “Current Understanding of the Physiopathology, Diagnosis and Therapeutic Approach to Alzheimer's Disease.” Biomedicine 9: 1910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Gheidari, D. , Mehrdad M., and Karimelahi Z.. 2024. “Virtual Screening, ADMET Prediction, Molecular Docking, and Dynamic Simulation Studies of Natural Products as BACE1 Inhibitors for the Management of Alzheimer's Disease.” Scientific Reports 14: 26431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ghofrani, S. , Joghataei M.‐T., Mohseni S., et al. 2015. “Naringenin Improves Learning and Memory in an Alzheimer's Disease Rat Model: Insights Into the Underlying Mechanisms.” European Journal of Pharmacology 764: 195–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Godoy, J. A. , Lindsay C. B., Quintanilla R. A., Carvajal F. J., Cerpa W., and Inestrosa N. C.. 2017. “Quercetin Exerts Differential Neuroprotective Effects Against H 2 O 2 and Aβ Aggregates in Hippocampal Neurons: The Role of Mitochondria.” Molecular Neurobiology 54: 7116–7128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Govindpani, K. , McNamara L. G., Smith N. R., et al. 2019. “Vascular Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease: A Prelude to the Pathological Process or a Consequence of It?” Journal of Clinical Medicine 8: 651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Granzotto, A. , and Zatta P.. 2011. “Resveratrol Acts Not Through Anti‐Aggregative Pathways but Mainly via Its Scavenging Properties Against Aβ and Aβ‐Metal Complexes Toxicity.” PLoS One 6: e21565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Grewal, A. K. , Singh T. G., Sharma D., et al. 2021. “Mechanistic Insights and Perspectives Involved in Neuroprotective Action of Quercetin.” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 140: 111729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Habtemariam, S. 2016. “The Therapeutic Potential of Rosemary ( Rosmarinus officinalis ) Diterpenes for Alzheimer's Disease.” Evidence‐Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2016: 2680409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Han, F. , Wang W., and Chen C.. 2014. “Research Progress in Animal Models and Stem Cell Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease.” Journal of Neurorestoratology 3: 11–22. [Google Scholar]
  72. Hardy, J. A. , and Higgins G. A.. 1992. “Alzheimer's Disease: The Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis.” Science 256: 184–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Hardy, J. , and Selkoe D. J.. 2002. “The Amyloid Hypothesis of Alzheimer's Disease: Progress and Problems on the Road to Therapeutics.” Science 297: 353–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Hassan, F.‐u. , Liu C., Mehboob M., et al. 2023. “Potential of Dietary Hemp and Cannabinoids to Modulate Immune Response to Enhance Health and Performance in Animals: Opportunities and Challenges.” Frontiers in Immunology 14: 1285052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. He, X.‐Y. , Frackowiak J., Dobkin C., Brown W. T., and Yang S.‐Y.. 2023. “Involvement of Type 10 17β‐Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase in the Pathogenesis of Infantile Neurodegeneration and Alzheimer's Disease.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24: 17604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Heneka, M. T. , Carson M. J., El Khoury J., et al. 2015. “Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's Disease.” Lancet Neurology 14: 388–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Henríquez, G. , Gomez A., Guerrero E., and Narayan M.. 2020. “Potential Role of Natural Polyphenols Against Protein Aggregation Toxicity: In Vitro, In Vivo, and Clinical Studies.” ACS Chemical Neuroscience 11: 2915–2934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Heo, H. J. , Kim M.‐J., Lee J.‐M., et al. 2004. “Naringenin From Citrus Junos has an Inhibitory Effect on Acetylcholinesterase and a Mitigating Effect on Amnesia.” Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 17: 151–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Heppner, F. L. , Ransohoff R. M., and Becher B.. 2015. “Immune Attack: The Role of Inflammation in Alzheimer Disease.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 16: 358–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Iqbal, D. , Rehman M. T., Bin Dukhyil A., et al. 2021. “High‐Throughput Screening and Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Natural Product‐Like Compounds Against Alzheimer's Disease Through Multitarget Approach.” Pharmaceuticals 14: 937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Iqbal, K. , Liu F., Gong C.‐X., and Grundke‐Iqbal I.. 2010. “Tau in Alzheimer Disease and Related Tauopathies.” Current Alzheimer Research 7: 656–664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Iraz, M. , Ozerol E., Gulec M., et al. 2006. “Protective Effect of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) Administration on Cisplatin‐Induced Oxidative Damage to Liver in Rat.” Cell Biochemistry and Function Cellular biochemistry and its modulation by active agents or disease 24: 357–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Islam, M. R. , Al‐Imran M. I. K., Zehravi M., et al. 2025. “Targeting Signaling Pathways in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Quercetin's Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms for Neuroprotection.” Animal Models and Experimental Medicine 8: 798–818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Jack, C. R., Jr. , Bennett D. A., Blennow K., et al. 2018. “NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a Biological Definition of Alzheimer's Disease.” Alzheimer's & Dementia 14: 535–562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Jafari, A. , Babaei P., Rohampour K., and Rashtiani S.. 2022. “The Effect of Kaempferol on Autophagy and Nrf‐2 Signaling in a Rat Model of Aβ1‐42‐Induced Alzheimer's Disease.” Caspian Journal of Neurological Sciences 8: 7–16. [Google Scholar]
  86. Jang, J.‐H. , Lee S. H., Jung K., Yoo H., and Park G.. 2020. “Inhibitory Effects of Myricetin on Lipopolysaccharide‐Induced Neuroinflammation.” Brain Sciences 10: 32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Jang, S. , Dilger R. N., and Johnson R. W.. 2010. “Luteolin Inhibits Microglia and Alters Hippocampal‐Dependent Spatial Working Memory in Aged Mice.” Journal of Nutrition 140: 1892–1898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Jangdey, M. S. , Gupta A., and Sarwa K.. 2018. “Apigenin and Quercetin: Potential Therapeutic Challenging Effective Against in Alzheimer's Disease.” Pharmaceutical and Biosciences Journal 6: 46–51. [Google Scholar]
  89. Jazvinšćak Jembrek, M. , Oršolić N., Mandić L., Sadžak A., and Šegota S.. 2021. “Anti‐Oxidative, Anti‐Inflammatory and Anti‐Apoptotic Effects of Flavonols: Targeting Nrf2, NF‐κB and p53 Pathways in Neurodegeneration.” Antioxidants 10: 1628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Jin‐Feng, F. , Wang P.‐P., Xiong F., et al. 2025. “Dietary Polyphenols in Obesity Management: Critical Insights on Health Benefits and Mechanisms of Action.” Journal of Food Science 90, no. 6: e70267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Kabir, E. R. , Chowdhury N. M., Yasmin H., et al. 2023. “Unveiling the Potential of Polyphenols as Anti‐Amyloid Molecules in Alzheimer's Disease.” Current Neuropharmacology 21: 787–807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Karran, E. , and De Strooper B.. 2016. “The Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis: Are We Poised for Success or Failure?” Journal of Neurochemistry 139: 237–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Khan, H. , Ullah H., Aschner M., Cheang W. S., and Akkol E. K.. 2019. “Neuroprotective Effects of Quercetin in Alzheimer's Disease.” Biomolecules 10: 59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Khan, M. B. , Khan M. M., Khan A., et al. 2012. “Naringenin Ameliorates Alzheimer's Disease (AD)‐Type Neurodegeneration With Cognitive Impairment (AD‐TNDCI) Caused by the Intracerebroventricular‐Streptozotocin in Rat Model.” Neurochemistry International 61: 1081–1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Kim, C.‐J. , Shin S.‐H., Kim B.‐J., et al. 2018. “The Effects of Kaempferol‐Inhibited Autophagy on Osteoclast Formation.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19: 125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Kim, C.‐Y. , Lee C., Park G. H., and Jang J.‐H.. 2009. “Neuroprotective Effect of Epigallocatechin‐3‐Gallate Against β‐Amyloid‐Induced Oxidative and Nitrosative Cell Death via Augmentation of Antioxidant Defense Capacity.” Archives of Pharmacal Research 32: 869–881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Kim, J. K. , Choi S. J., Cho H. Y., et al. 2010. “Protective Effects of Kaempferol (3, 4′, 5, 7‐Tetrahydroxyflavone) Against Amyloid Beta Peptide (Aβ)‐Induced Neurotoxicity in ICR Mice.” Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 74: 397–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Knopman, D. S. , Jones D. T., and Greicius M. D.. 2021. “Failure to Demonstrate Efficacy of Aducanumab: An Analysis of the EMERGE and ENGAGE Trials as Reported by Biogen, December 2019.” Alzheimer's & Dementia 17: 696–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Koutsilieri, E. , and Riederer P.. 2007. “Excitotoxicity and New Antiglutamatergic Strategies in Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease.” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 13: S329–S331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Kumari, N. , Daram N., Alam M. S., and Verma A. K.. 2022. “Rationalizing the Use of Polyphenol Nano‐Formulations in the Therapy of Neurodegenerative Diseases.” CNS & Neurological Disorders 21: 966–976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Lawal, M. , Olotu F. A., and Soliman M. E.. 2018. “Across the Blood‐Brain Barrier: Neurotherapeutic Screening and Characterization of Naringenin as a Novel CRMP‐2 Inhibitor in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease Using Bioinformatics and Computational Tools.” Computers in Biology and Medicine 98: 168–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Liu, J. , Li T., Zhong G., et al. 2023. “Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Natural Compounds for Alzheimer's Disease: Mechanisms of Action and Pharmacological Properties.” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 166: 115406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Liu, W. , Hu X., Zhou L., Tu Y., Shi S., and Yao T.. 2020. “Orientation‐Inspired Perspective on Molecular Inhibitor of Tau Aggregation by Curcumin Conjugated With Ruthenium (II) Complex Scaffold.” Journal of Physical Chemistry B 124: 2343–2353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Long, H.‐Z. , Cheng Y., Zhou Z.‐W., Luo H.‐Y., Wen D.‐D., and Gao L.‐C.. 2021. “PI3K/AKT Signal Pathway: A Target of Natural Products in the Prevention and Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease.” Frontiers in Pharmacology 12: 648636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Long, J. M. , and Holtzman D. M.. 2019. “Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies.” Cell 179: 312–339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Luccarini, I. , Grossi C., Rigacci S., et al. 2015. “Oleuropein Aglycone Protects Against Pyroglutamylated‐3 Amyloid‐ß Toxicity: Biochemical, Epigenetic and Functional Correlates.” Neurobiology of Aging 36: 648–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Lv, H. , Wang Y., Yang X., Ling G., and Zhang P.. 2023. “Application of Curcumin Nanoformulations in Alzheimer's Disease: Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment.” Nutritional Neuroscience 26: 727–742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Ma, J. , Yang W.‐Q., Zha H., and Yu H.‐R.. 2013a. “Effect of Naringenin on Learning and Memory Ability on Model Rats With Alzheimer Disease.” Zhong Yao Cai = Zhongyaocai = Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials 36: 271–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Ma, Q.‐L. , Zuo X., and Yang F.. 2013b. “Curcumin Suppresses Soluble Tau Dimers and Corrects Molecular Chaperone, Synaptic, and Behavioral Deficits in Aged Human Tau Transgenic Mice.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 288: 4056–4065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Maher, P. 2009. “Modulation of Multiple Pathways Involved in the Maintenance of Neuronal Function During Aging by Fisetin.” Genes & Nutrition 4: 297–307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Mamashli, F. , Meratan A. A., Ghasemi A., et al. 2023. “Neuroprotective Effect of Propolis Polyphenol‐Based Nanosheets in Cellular and Animal Models of Rotenone‐Induced Parkinson's Disease.” ACS Chemical Neuroscience 14: 851–863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Mandel, S. , Amit T., Bar‐Am O., and Youdim M. B.. 2007. “Iron Dysregulation in Alzheimer's Disease: Multimodal Brain Permeable Iron Chelating Drugs, Possessing Neuroprotective‐Neurorescue and Amyloid Precursor Protein‐Processing Regulatory Activities as Therapeutic Agents.” Progress in Neurobiology 82: 348–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Mandel, S. A. , Amit T., Weinreb O., and Youdim M. B.. 2011. “Understanding the Broad‐Spectrum Neuroprotective Action Profile of Green Tea Polyphenols in Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases.” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 25: 187–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Mani, R. J. , Mittal K., and Katare D. P.. 2018. “Protective Effects of Quercetin in Zebrafish Model of Alzheimer's Disease.” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics 12: S660. [Google Scholar]
  115. McGrattan, A. M. , McGuinness B., McKinley M. C., et al. 2019. “Diet and Inflammation in Cognitive Ageing and Alzheimer's Disease.” Current Nutrition Reports 8: 53–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. McShane, R. , Westby M. J., Roberts E., et al. 1996. “Memantine for Dementia.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019 3: CD003154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Meng, X. , Fu M., Wang S., Chen W., Wang J., and Zhang N.. 2021. “Naringin Ameliorates Memory Deficits and Exerts Neuroprotective Effects in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease by Regulating Multiple Metabolic Pathways.” Molecular Medicine Reports 23: 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Montagne, A. , Zhao Z., and Zlokovic B. V.. 2017. “Alzheimer's Disease: A Matter of Blood–Brain Barrier Dysfunction?” Journal of Experimental Medicine 214: 3151–3169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Moratilla‐Rivera, I. , Sánchez M., Valdés‐González J. A., and Gómez‐Serranillos M. P.. 2023. “Natural Products as Modulators of Nrf2 Signaling Pathway in Neuroprotection.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24: 3748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Moreira, N. C. D. S. , Lima J. E. B. F., Marchiori M. F., Carvalho I., and Sakamoto‐Hojo E. T.. 2022. “Neuroprotective Effects of Cholinesterase Inhibitors: Current Scenario in Therapies for Alzheimer's Disease and Future Perspectives.” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports 6: 177–193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Morris, M. C. , Tangney C. C., Wang Y., Sacks F. M., Bennett D. A., and Aggarwal N. T.. 2015. “MIND Diet Associated With Reduced Incidence of Alzheimer's Disease.” Alzheimer's & Dementia 11: 1007–1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Mou, L. , Dou W., Meng G., Sun K., and Chen X.. 2020. “The Structural Basis of the Autoinhibition Mechanism of Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β (GSK3β): Molecular Modeling and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies.” Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 38: 1741–1750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Moussa, C. , Hebron M., Huang X., et al. 2017. “Resveratrol Regulates Neuro‐Inflammation and Induces Adaptive Immunity in Alzheimer's Disease.” Journal of Neuroinflammation 14: 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Murugan, R. , Selvan S. T., Jothinathan M. K. D., Srinivasan G. P., Renuka R. R., and Prasad M.. 2024. “Molecular Docking and Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion (ADME) Analysis: Examining the Binding Modes and Affinities of Myricetin With Insulin Receptor, Glycogen Synthase Kinase, and Glucokinase.” Cureus 16: e53810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Nabi, F. , Arain M., Hassan F., et al. 2020. “Nutraceutical Role of Selenium Nanoparticles in Poultry Nutrition: A Review.” World's Poultry Science Journal 76: 459–471. [Google Scholar]
  126. Nabi, F. , Arain M. A., Rajput N., et al. 2020. “Health Benefits of Carotenoids and Potential Application in Poultry Industry: A Review.” Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 104: 1809–1818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Ngandu, T. , Lehtisalo J., Solomon A., et al. 2015. “A 2 Year Multidomain Intervention of Diet, Exercise, Cognitive Training, and Vascular Risk Monitoring Versus Control to Prevent Cognitive Decline in At‐Risk Elderly People (FINGER): A Randomised Controlled Trial.” Lancet 385: 2255–2263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Nunomura, A. , Castellani R. J., Zhu X., Moreira P. I., Perry G., and Smith M. A.. 2006. “Involvement of Oxidative Stress in Alzheimer Disease.” Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology 65: 631–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Ozpak, L. , and Bağca B. G.. 2024. “Neuroprotective Effects of Resveratrol Through Modulation of PI3K/Akt/GSK‐3β Pathway and Metalloproteases.” IUBMB Life 76: 1199–1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Pan, L.‐F. , Wang X.‐B., Xie S.‐S., Li S.‐Y., and Kong L.‐Y.. 2014. “Multitarget‐Directed Resveratrol Derivatives: Anti‐Cholinesterases, Anti‐β‐Amyloid Aggregation and Monoamine Oxidase Inhibition Properties Against Alzheimer's Disease.” MedChemComm 5: 609–616. [Google Scholar]
  131. Pandey, K. B. , and Rizvi S. I.. 2009. “Plant Polyphenols as Dietary Antioxidants in Human Health and Disease.” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2: 270–278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Pasinetti, G. M. 2012. “Novel Role of Red Wine‐Derived Polyphenols in the Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Dementia and Brain Pathology: Experimental Approaches and Clinical Implications.” Planta Medica 78: 1614–1619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Patel, C. , Pande S., and Acharya S.. 2020. “Potentiation of Anti‐Alzheimer Activity of Curcumin by Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus UBLR‐58 Against Scopolamine‐Induced Memory Impairment in Mice.” Naunyn‐Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology 393: 1955–1962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Patterson, S. L. 2015. “Immune Dysregulation and Cognitive Vulnerability in the Aging Brain: Interactions of Microglia, IL‐1β, BDNF and Synaptic Plasticity.” Neuropharmacology 96: 11–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Phatak, S. S. , Stephan C. C., and Cavasotto C. N.. 2009. “High‐Throughput and In Silico Screenings in Drug Discovery.” Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 4: 947–959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Popugaeva, E. , Pchitskaya E., and Bezprozvanny I.. 2017. “Dysregulation of Neuronal Calcium Homeostasis in Alzheimer's Disease—A Therapeutic Opportunity?” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 483: 998–1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Prajapati, C. , Tripathi P. N., Sood S., et al. 2025. “Intellectual Property Rights in Neuroprotective Biomaterials.” In Biomaterials and Neurodegenerative Disorders, 251–269. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  138. Qi, P. , Li J., Gao S., et al. 2020. “Network Pharmacology‐Based and Experimental Identification of the Effects of Quercetin on Alzheimer's Disease.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 12: 589588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Qian, D. , Wang Q., Lin S., et al. 2022. “Identification of Potential Targets of Cinnamon for Treatment Against Alzheimer's Disease‐Related GABAergic Synaptic Dysfunction Using Network Pharmacology.” Scientific Reports 12: 19959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Rahul, and Siddique Y. H.. 2021. “Neurodegenerative Diseases and Flavonoids: Special Reference to Kaempferol.” CNS & Neurological Disorders‐Drug Targets‐CNS & Neurological Disorders 20: 327–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Rai, S. N. 2021. Recent Advances in the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Disorders. Bentham Science Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  142. Rai, S. N. , Singh S., and Singh S. K.. 2024. Neurodegenerative Diseases: Translational Models, Mechanisms, and Therapeutics. CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  143. Rajasekar, N. , Dwivedi S., Kumar Tota S., et al. 2013. “Neuroprotective Effect of Curcumin on Okadaic Acid Induced Memory Impairment in Mice.” European Journal of Pharmacology 715: 381–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Ramakrishna, K. , Viswanadh M. K., Dumala N., et al. 2025. “Advanced Biomaterials in Neuroprotection: Innovations and Clinical Applications.” In Biomaterials and Neurodegenerative Disorders, 69–92. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  145. Rani, P. , Yadav P. K., Singh A. K., Nayak S., Kumar K. D., and Kumar R.. 2024. “Structural, Material and Antibacterial Properties of Quercetin Incorporated Soy Protein Isolate Films and Its Binding Behavior Through Molecular Docking.” Biopolymers 115: e23569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Reddy, P. H. , and Beal M. F.. 2008. “Amyloid Beta, Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Synaptic Damage: Implications for Cognitive Decline in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease.” Trends in Molecular Medicine 14: 45–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Rehman, A. U. , Buzdar J. A., Arain M. A., Fazlani S. A., Arslan M., and Zhou C.. 2025. “An In‐Depth Overview of the Nutritional Advantages of Medicinal Plant Supplementation in Poultry Feed.” World's Poultry Science Journal 81: 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  148. Ringman, J. M. , Frautschy S. A., Teng E., et al. 2012. “Oral Curcumin for Alzheimer's Disease: Tolerability and Efficacy in a 24‐Week Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Study.” Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 4: 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Rivera, S. , García‐González L., Khrestchatisky M., and Baranger K.. 2019. “Metalloproteinases and Their Tissue Inhibitors in Alzheimer's Disease and Other Neurodegenerative Disorders.” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 76: 3167–3191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Sabogal‐Guáqueta, A. M. , Muñoz‐Manco J. I., Ramírez‐Pineda J. R., Lamprea‐Rodriguez M., Osorio E., and Cardona‐Gómez G. P.. 2015. “The Flavonoid Quercetin Ameliorates Alzheimer's Disease Pathology and Protects Cognitive and Emotional Function in Aged Triple Transgenic Alzheimer's Disease Model Mice.” Neuropharmacology 93: 134–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Sachdeva, A. K. , Kuhad A., and Chopra K.. 2014. “Naringin Ameliorates Memory Deficits in Experimental Paradigm of Alzheimer's Disease by Attenuating Mitochondrial Dysfunction.” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 127: 101–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Saeed, M. , Arain M. A., Ali Fazlani S., et al. 2021. “A Comprehensive Review on the Health Benefits and Nutritional Significance of Fucoidan Polysaccharide Derived From Brown Seaweeds in Human, Animals and Aquatic Organisms.” Aquaculture Nutrition 27: 633–654. [Google Scholar]
  153. Saeed, M. , Babazadeh D., Arif M., et al. 2017a. “Silymarin: A Potent Hepatoprotective Agent in Poultry Industry.” World's Poultry Science Journal 73: 483–492. [Google Scholar]
  154. Saeed, M. , Naveed M., Arain M., et al. 2017b. “Quercetin: Nutritional and Beneficial Effects in Poultry.” World's Poultry Science Journal 73: 355–364. [Google Scholar]
  155. Safdar, M. , Hassan F., Khan M. S., et al. 2024. “In Silico Analysis of Polyphenols Modulate Bovine PPARγ to Increase Milk Fat Synthesis in Dairy Cattle via the MAPK Signaling Pathways.” Journal of Animal Science 102: skae248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Samal, M. , Srivastava V., Khan M., et al. 2025. “Therapeutic Potential of Polyphenols in Cellular Reversal of Patho‐Mechanisms of Alzheimer's Disease Using In Vitro and In Vivo Models: A Comprehensive Review.” Phytotherapy Research 39: 25–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Sánchez‐Melgar, A. , Izquierdo‐Ramírez P. J., Griñán‐Ferré C., Pallàs M., Martín M., and Albasanz J. L.. 2022. “Neuroprotective Effects of Resveratrol by Modifying Cholesterol Metabolism and Aβ Processing in SAMP8 Mice.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23: 7580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Sanchez‐Mut, J. V. , and Gräff J.. 2015. “Epigenetic Alterations in Alzheimer's Disease.” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 9: 347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Saxena, S. , Wortmann M., Acosta D., Prince M., and Krishnamoorthy E.. 2012. Dementia: A Public Health Priority. World Health Organization and Alzheimer's Disease International, 103. WHO Press. [Google Scholar]
  160. Selkoe, D. J. 2002. “Alzheimer's Disease Is a Synaptic Failure.” Science 298: 789–791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Sharifi‐Rad, J. , Quispe C., Castillo C. M. S., et al. 2022. “Ellagic Acid: A Review on Its Natural Sources, Chemical Stability, and Therapeutic Potential.” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity: 3848084. 10.1155/2022/3848084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  162. Shih, P.‐H. , Wu C.‐H., Yeh C.‐T., and Yen G.‐C.. 2011. “Protective Effects of Anthocyanins Against Amyloid β‐Peptide‐Induced Damage in Neuro‐2A Cells.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59: 1683–1689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Simunkova, M. , Alwasel S. H., Alhazza I. M., et al. 2019. “Management of Oxidative Stress and Other Pathologies in Alzheimer's Disease.” Archives of Toxicology 93: 2491–2513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Singh, S. S. , Rai S. N., Birla H., Zahra W., Rathore A. S., and Singh S. P.. 2020. “NF‐κB‐Mediated Neuroinflammation in Parkinson's Disease and Potential Therapeutic Effect of Polyphenols.” Neurotoxicity Research 37: 491–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Singh, S. , Rai S. N., and Singh S. K.. 2024. Synaptic Plasticity in Neurodegenerative Disorders. CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  166. Small, D. H. 2009. “Dysregulation of Calcium Homeostasis in Alzheimer's Disease.” Neurochemical Research 34: 1824–1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Sousa, J. C. , Grandela C., Fernández‐Ruiz J., et al. 2004. “Transthyretin Is Involved in Depression‐Like Behaviour and Exploratory Activity.” Journal of Neurochemistry 88: 1052–1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Spencer, P. S. 2020. “Neuroprotein Targets of γ‐Diketone Metabolites of Aliphatic and Aromatic Solvents That Induce Central–Peripheral Axonopathy.” Toxicologic Pathology 48: 411–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Stefani, M. , and Rigacci S.. 2013. “Protein Folding and Aggregation Into Amyloid: The Interference by Natural Phenolic Compounds.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14: 12411–12457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Swanson, C. J. , Zhang Y., Dhadda S., et al. 2021. “A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Phase 2b Proof‐Of‐Concept Clinical Trial in Early Alzheimer's Disease With Lecanemab, an Anti‐Aβ Protofibril Antibody.” Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 13: 1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Sweeney, M. D. , Montagne A., Sagare A. P., et al. 2019. “Vascular Dysfunction—The Disregarded Partner of Alzheimer's Disease.” Alzheimer's & Dementia 15: 158–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Sweeney, M. D. , Sagare A. P., and Zlokovic B. V.. 2018. “Blood–Brain Barrier Breakdown in Alzheimer Disease and Other Neurodegenerative Disorders.” Nature Reviews Neurology 14: 133–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Swerdlow, R. H. 2018. “Mitochondria and Mitochondrial Cascades in Alzheimer's Disease.” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 62: 1403–1416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Tang, S. , Zhang Y., Botchway B. O., Wang X., Huang M., and Liu X.. 2024. “Epigallocatechin‐3‐Gallate Inhibits Oxidative Stress Through the Keap1/Nrf2 Signaling Pathway to Improve Alzheimer Disease.” Molecular Neurobiology 62: 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Tang, Y.‐W. , Shi C.‐J., Yang H.‐L., et al. 2019. “Synthesis and Evaluation of Isoprenylation‐Resveratrol Dimer Derivatives Against Alzheimer's Disease.” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 163: 307–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Tayab, M. A. , Islam M. N., Chowdhury K. A. A., and Tasnim F. M.. 2022. “Targeting Neuroinflammation by Polyphenols: A Promising Therapeutic Approach Against Inflammation‐Associated Depression.” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 147: 112668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Teleanu, D. M. , Chircov C., Grumezescu A. M., Volceanov A., and Teleanu R. I.. 2018. “Blood‐Brain Delivery Methods Using Nanotechnology.” Pharmaceutics 10: 269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Terry, A. V., Jr. , Callahan P. M., Hall B., and Webster S. J.. 2011. “Alzheimer's Disease and Age‐Related Memory Decline (Preclinical).” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 99: 190–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Thottappillil, A. , Sahoo S., Chakraborty A., et al. 2024. “In Vitro and In Silico Analysis Proving DPP4 Inhibition and Diabetes‐Associated Gene Network Modulation by a Polyherbal Formulation: Nisakathakadi Kashaya.” Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 42: 13588–13602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Tian, J. , Jia K., Wang T., et al. 2024. “Hippocampal Transcriptome‐Wide Association Study and Pathway Analysis of Mitochondrial Solute Carriers in Alzheimer's Disease.” Translational Psychiatry 14: 250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Uddin, M. S. , Stachowiak A., Mamun A. A., et al. 2018. “Autophagy and Alzheimer's Disease: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Implications.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 10: 04. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Ullah, A. , Khan M., Akram M., et al. 2024. “CRISPR Cas‐9 for Treatment and Control of Avian Viral Diseases: Challenges and Opportunities.” World's Poultry Science Journal 80: 745–765. [Google Scholar]
  183. Valverde‐Salazar, V. , Ruiz‐Gabarre D., and García‐Escudero V.. 2023. “Alzheimer's Disease and Green Tea: Epigallocatechin‐3‐Gallate as a Modulator of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress.” Antioxidants 12: 1460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Vauzour, D. , Rodriguez‐Mateos A., Corona G., Oruna‐Concha M. J., and Spencer J. P.. 2010. “Polyphenols and Human Health: Prevention of Disease and Mechanisms of Action.” Nutrients 2: 1106–1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Velásquez‐Jiménez, D. , Corella‐Salazar D. A., Zuñiga‐Martínez B. S., et al. 2021. “Phenolic Compounds That Cross the Blood–Brain Barrier Exert Positive Health Effects as Central Nervous System Antioxidants.” Food & Function 12: 10356–10369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Wang, H. , Jiang T., Li W., Gao N., and Zhang T.. 2018. “Resveratrol Attenuates Oxidative Damage Through Activating Mitophagy in an In Vitro Model of Alzheimer's Disease.” Toxicology Letters 282: 100–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Wang, L. , Liu J., Wang Q., et al. 2019. “MicroRNA‐200a‐3p Mediates Neuroprotection in Alzheimer‐Related Deficits and Attenuates Amyloid‐Beta Overproduction and Tau Hyperphosphorylation via Coregulating BACE1 and PRKACB.” Frontiers in Pharmacology 10: 806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Wang, L. , Tang Z., Li B., et al. 2024. “Myricetin Ameliorates Cognitive Impairment in 3× Tg Alzheimer's Disease Mice by Regulating Oxidative Stress and Tau Hyperphosphorylation.” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 177: 116963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Weinreb, O. , Amit T., Mandel S., and Youdim M. B.. 2009. “Neuroprotective Molecular Mechanisms of (−)‐Epigallocatechin‐3‐Gallate: A Reflective Outcome of Its Antioxidant, Iron Chelating and Neuritogenic Properties.” Genes & Nutrition 4: 283–296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Wu, J. , Kou X., Ju H., Zhang H., Yang A., and Shen R.. 2021. “Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Naringenin Carbamate Derivatives as Potential Multifunctional Agents for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 49: 128316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Wu, X. , Zheng X., Tang H., et al. 2022. “A Network Pharmacology Approach to Identify the Mechanisms and Molecular Targets of Curcumin Against Alzheimer Disease.” Medicine 101: e30194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Yahfoufi, N. , Alsadi N., Jambi M., and Matar C.. 2018. “The Immunomodulatory and Anti‐Inflammatory Role of Polyphenols.” Nutrients 10: 1618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Yan, H. , Meng X., Lin X., Duan N., Wang Z., and Wu S.. 2023. “Antifungal Activity and Inhibitory Mechanisms of Ferulic Acid Against the Growth of Fusarium Graminearum.” Food Bioscience 52: 102414. [Google Scholar]
  194. Yang, F. , Lim G. P., Begum A. N., et al. 2005. “Curcumin Inhibits Formation of Amyloid β Oligomers and Fibrils, Binds Plaques, and Reduces Amyloid In Vivo.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 280: 5892–5901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Yang, W. , Ma J., Liu Z., Lu Y., Hu B., and Yu H.. 2014. “Effect of Naringenin on Brain Insulin Signaling and Cognitive Functions in ICV‐STZ Induced Dementia Model of Rats.” Neurological Sciences 35: 741–751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Yatao, X. , Saeed M., Kamboh A., et al. 2018. “The Potentially Beneficial Effects of Supplementation With Hesperidin in Poultry Diets.” World's Poultry Science Journal 74: 265–276. [Google Scholar]
  197. Youn, K. , Ho C.‐T., and Jun M.. 2023. “Investigating the Potential Anti‐Alzheimer's Disease Mechanism of Marine Polyphenols: Insights From Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking.” Marine Drugs 21: 580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Zaplatic, E. , Bule M., Shah S. Z. A., Uddin M. S., and Niaz K.. 2019. “Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Protective Role of Quercetin in Attenuating Alzheimer's Disease.” Life Sciences 224: 109–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Zareei, S. , Pourmand S., Eskandarzadeh M., and Massahi S.. 2024. “In Silico Anti‐Alzheimer Study of Phytochemicals From Lamiaceae Family Through GSK3‐β Inhibition.” Scientific Reports 14: 834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Zbarsky, V. , Datla K. P., Parkar S., Rai D. K., Aruoma O. I., and Dexter D. T.. 2005. “Neuroprotective Properties of the Natural Phenolic Antioxidants Curcumin and Naringenin but Not Quercetin and Fisetin in a 6‐OHDA Model of Parkinson's Disease.” Free Radical Research 39: 1119–1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Zempel, H. , Luedtke J., Kumar Y., et al. 2013. “Amyloid‐β Oligomers Induce Synaptic Damage via Tau‐Dependent Microtubule Severing by TTLL6 and Spastin.” EMBO Journal 32: 2920–2937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Zhang, F. , Liu J., and Shi J.‐S.. 2010. “Anti‐Inflammatory Activities of Resveratrol in the Brain: Role of Resveratrol in Microglial Activation.” European Journal of Pharmacology 636: 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Zhang, M. , Hu G., Shao N., et al. 2021. “Thioredoxin‐Interacting Protein (TXNIP) as a Target for Alzheimer's Disease: Flavonoids and Phenols.” Inflammopharmacology 29: 1317–1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Zhang, M. , Xue J., Chen X., et al. 2023. “Bioactivity of Hamamelitannin, Flavokawain A, and Triacetyl Resveratrol as Natural Compounds: Molecular Docking Study, Anticolon Cancer, and Anti‐Alzheimer Potentials.” Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry 70: 730–745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Zhang, Q. , Wu D., Wu J., et al. 2015. “Improved Blood–Brain Barrier Distribution: Effect of Borneol on the Brain Pharmacokinetics of Kaempferol in Rats by In Vivo Microdialysis Sampling.” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 162: 270–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Zhang, Y. , Lv C., and Zhao G.. 2022. “Ways to Enhance the Bioavailability of Polyphenols in the Brain: A Journey Through the Blood‐Brain Barrier.” Food Reviews International 38: 812–828. [Google Scholar]
  207. Zhao, L. , Wang J.‐L., Liu R., Li X.‐X., Li J.‐F., and Zhang L.. 2013. “Neuroprotective, Anti‐Amyloidogenic and Neurotrophic Effects of Apigenin in an Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Model.” Molecules 18: 9949–9965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Zhao, L. , Wang J.‐l., Wang Y.‐r., and Fa X.‐z.. 2013. “Apigenin Attenuates Copper‐Mediated β‐Amyloid Neurotoxicity Through Antioxidation, Mitochondrion Protection and MAPK Signal Inactivation in an AD Cell Model.” Brain Research 1492: 33–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Zhu, Y. , Guo X., Li S., et al. 2024. “Naringenin Ameliorates Amyloid‐β Pathology and Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's Disease.” Communications Biology 7: 912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors have nothing to report.


Articles from Food Science & Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES