Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2025 Aug 22:2025.08.18.670886. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2025.08.18.670886

Table 3. Validation of male and female nSR and female cAF human atrial models:

Model outputs for action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD90), APD50, resting membrane potential (RMP), AP amplitude (APA), maximum upstroke velocity (Vmax), plateau voltage (VPLT), and Ca2+ transient amplitude (CaTAmp) compared to experimental results from (Ravens, 2018; Heijman et al., 2020; Pecha et al., 2023). Symbols indicating significant differences between groups (p < 0.05), were as reported in Pecha et al., 2023 and Ravens, 2018.

nSR
Male Female M vs. F Male Female M vs. F
Biomarker Model Experiment
APD90 (ms) 299.69 291.96 = 319.91±2.60 314.80±4.19 N.S. (Ravens, 2018; Pecha et al., 2023)
APD50 (ms) 108.96 119.63 < 136.98±2.39 146.87±3.85 < (Ravens, 2018; Pecha et al., 2023)
RMP (mV) −78.45 −77.21 < −74.58±0.24 −73.16±0.39 < (Ravens, 2018; Pecha et al., 2023)
APA (mV) 114.73 113.83 > 95.50±0.47 92.8±0.75 > (Ravens, 2018; Pecha et al., 2023)
Vmax (V/S) 237.02 204.80 > 234.04±4.50 212.07±7.27 > (Ravens, 2018; Pecha et al., 2023)
VPLT (mV) −11.09 −7.86 < −16.78±0.57 −15.11±0.92 N.S. (Pecha et al., 2023)
< (Ravens, 2018)
CaTAmp (nM) 259.96 275.21 < 217.11±135.64 261.63±175.19 N.S. (Heijman et al., 2020)
cAF
Male Female M vs. F Male Female M vs. F
Biomarker Model Experiment
APD90 (ms) 230.55 219.13 = 216.01±3.34 222.19±4.30 N.S. (Ravens, 2018; Pecha et al., 2023)
APD50 (ms) 101.47 102.57 = 99.19±3.09 101.79±3.98 N.S. (Ravens, 2018; Pecha et al., 2023)
RMP (mV) −82.51 −82.32 = −77.57±0.30 −77.27±0.39 N.S. (Ravens, 2018; Pecha et al., 2023)
APA (mV) 125.57 123.42 = 102.20±0.59 100.98±0.77 N.S. (Ravens, 2018; Pecha et al., 2023)
Vmax (V/s) 239.70 212.64 > 248.23±5.65 233.1±7.28 N.S. (Pecha et al., 2023)
> (Ravens, 2018)
VPLT (mV) −5.97 −5.83 = −5.56±0.72 −6.63±0.93 N.S. (Ravens, 2018; Pecha et al., 2023)
CaTAmp (nM) 170.53 203.70 < / / /