[Preprint]. 2025 Aug 22:2025.08.18.670921. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2025.08.18.670921

Table 4:

Statistical tests for changes in spiking activity of TC and TRN populations under closed-loop CT modulation - Figure 7E

i)	Spiking activity of aligned (270°) vs opposing cells (90°) for different levels of CT modulation
Pop	CSI	0%	10%	25%	50%	100%

TRN	0.0	0.9581	0.9581	0.7927	0.8746	0.9581
	0.5	0.0009^***	0.0003^***	0.0002^***	0.0009^***	0.0009^***
	1.0	0.0009^***	0.0009^***	0.0009^***	0.0002^***	0.0002^***

TC	0.0	0.0009^***	0.0002^***	0.0002^***	0.0002^***	0.0002^***
	0.5	0.0002^***	0.0002^***	0.0009^***	0.0002^***	0.0002^***
	1.0	0.0002^***	0.0002^***	0.0009^***	0.0002^***	0.0002^***
ii)	Spiking activity of CT tested vs CT = 0.0% for aligned and opposite neurons of different circuit configurations
Pop	Angle	CSI	10%	25%	50%	100%

TRN	Aligned	0.0	0.6454	0.1412	0.0281^*	0.0027^**
		0.5	0.1605	0.0830	0.0054^**	0.0002^***
		1.0	0.5280	0.4306	0.0404^*	0.0019^**

	Opposite	0.0	0.4616	0.0656	0.0379^*	0.0003^***
		0.5	0.3181	0.2698	0.0308^*	0.0016^**
		1.0	0.8333	0.9580	0.6363	0.9162

TC	Aligned	0.0	0.5737	0.0047^**	0.0011^**	0.0002^***
		0.5	0.1304	0.0156^*	0.0003^***	0.0002^***
		1.0	0.1304	0.0104^*	0.0002^***	0.0002^***

	Opposite	0.0	0.2698	0.1028	0.0238^*	0.0009^***
		0.5	0.9162	0.8335	0.1605	0.0830
		1.0	0.6454	0.7927	0.7525	0.6454

Two-sided Mann-Whitney U test

p >= 0.05: ns ; p < 0.05: * ; p < 0.01: ** ; p < 0.001: *** ; p < 0.0001: ****