Table 2.
Model comparisons for summed base image and identity oddball harmonics
| P(M) | P(M|data) | Log(BFM) | Log(BF10) | error% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base image response models | |||||
| Null model (subject + random slopes) | 0.2 | 6.422 × 10–13 | − 26.688 | .000 | |
| Pres. Rate | 0.2 | 0.481 | 1.312 | 27.343 | 1.085 |
| Pres. Rate + Group | 0.2 | 0.318 | 0.622 | 26.927 | 1.172 |
| Group + Pres. Rate + Group✻Pres. Rate | 0.2 | 0.201 | 0.005 | 26.469 | 1.358 |
| Group | 0.2 | 2.732 × 10–13 | − 27.542 | − 0.855 | 0.728 |
| Identity oddball response models | |||||
| Null model (subject + random slopes) | 0.2 | 0.397 | 0.968 | 0 | |
| Group | 0.2 | 0.311 | 0.592 | − 0.243 | 1.100 |
| Pres. Rate | 0.2 | 0.140 | − 0.432 | − 1.045 | 0.602 |
| Group + Pres. Rate | 0.2 | 0.112 | − 0.682 | − 1.263 | 1.481 |
| Group + Pres. Rate + Group✻Pres. Rate | 0.2 | 0.040 | − 1.793 | − 2.296 | 1.264 |
Exhaustive comparisons of possible models in the Face Identity Discrimination experiment, conducted separately for base image (top) and identity oddball (bottom) responses, containing every possible combination of factors (including main/interaction terms), against the null model including only subject and random slope terms for all repeated measures factors