Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 28;38(5):61. doi: 10.1007/s10548-025-01136-9

Table 2.

Model comparisons for summed base image and identity oddball harmonics

P(M) P(M|data) Log(BFM) Log(BF10) error%
Base image response models
   Null model (subject + random slopes) 0.2 6.422 × 10–13 − 26.688 .000
   Pres. Rate 0.2 0.481 1.312 27.343 1.085
   Pres. Rate + Group 0.2 0.318 0.622 26.927 1.172
   Group + Pres. Rate + Group✻Pres. Rate 0.2 0.201 0.005 26.469 1.358
   Group 0.2 2.732 × 10–13 − 27.542 − 0.855 0.728
Identity oddball response models
   Null model (subject + random slopes) 0.2 0.397 0.968 0
   Group 0.2 0.311 0.592 − 0.243 1.100
   Pres. Rate 0.2 0.140 − 0.432 − 1.045 0.602
   Group + Pres. Rate 0.2 0.112 − 0.682 − 1.263 1.481
   Group + Pres. Rate + Group✻Pres. Rate 0.2 0.040 − 1.793 − 2.296 1.264

Exhaustive comparisons of possible models in the Face Identity Discrimination experiment, conducted separately for base image (top) and identity oddball (bottom) responses, containing every possible combination of factors (including main/interaction terms), against the null model including only subject and random slope terms for all repeated measures factors