Table 4.

Model comparisons for summed base image and face oddball harmonics

	P(M)	P(M|data)	Log(BFM)	Log(BF10)	error %
Base image response models
Null model (subject + random slopes)	0.2	1.055 × 10–5	− 10.073	0.000
Duty Cycle + Group	0.2	0.439	1.143	10.637	1.609
Duty Cycle	0.2	0.329	0.673	10.347	0.634
Duty Cycle + Group + Duty Cycle ✻ Group	0.2	0.232	0.187	9.996	1.648
Group	0.2	1.068 × 10–5	− 10.061	0.012	0.560
Face oddball response models
Null model (subject + random slopes)	0.2	1.455 × 10–6	− 12.054	0.000
Condition	0.2	0.495	1.368	12.738	0.743
Condition + Group	0.2	0.395	.962	12.513	1.853
Condition + Group + Condition ✻ Group	0.2	0.109	− 0.714	11.225	4.306
Group	0.2	5.946 × 10–5	− 12.485	− 0.411	0.587

Exhaustive comparisons of possible models in the Duty Cycle experiment, conducted separately for base image (top) and face oddball (bottom) responses, containing every possible combination of factors (including main/interaction terms), against the null model including only subject and random slope terms for all repeated measures factors