Skip to main content
. 2002 Jun;68(6):2690–2698. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.2690-2698.2002

TABLE 3.

Classification of E. coli isolates by source based on MAR profiles and DA analysis

Source % of isolates classified asa:
Human (n = 96) Beef (n = 25) Dairy (n = 32) Chicken (n = 10) Pig (n = 19) Turkey (n = 34) Deer (n = 81) Goose (n = 20) Moose (n = 2)
Human 48.96 5.21 1.04 2.08 9.38 3.13 2.08 1.04 27.08
Beef cattle 0 24.00 0 8.00 0 4.00 0 0 64.00
Dairy cattle 3.13 6.25 0 0 9.38 3.13 9.38 0 68.75
Chicken 0 10.00 0 80.00 10.00 0 0 0 0
Pig 0 5.26 5.26 0 63.16 26.32 0 0 0
Turkey 2.94 0 0 5.88 14.71 61.76 2.94 0 11.76
Deer 1.23 7.41 0 1.23 1.23 1.23 14.81 2.47 70.37
Goose 5.00 10.00 0 0 0 0 15.00 0 70.00
Moose 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.00
a

When human, livestock, and wildlife species groups were distinguished, 55.21% of the isolates in the human species group (n = 96) were classified as human isolates, 10.42% of the isolates were classified as livestock isolates, and 34.38% of the isolates were classified as wildlife isolates; in the livestock species group (n = 120), 6.67% of the isolates were classified as human isolates, 45.83% of the isolates were classified as livestock isolates, and 47.50% of the isolates were classified as wildlife isolates; and in the wildlife species group (n = 103), 1.94% of the isolates were classified as human isolates, 2.91% of the isolates were classified as livestock isolates, and 95.15% of the isolates were classified as wildlife isolates. When human and nonhuman species groups were distinguished, 56.25% of the isolates in the human species group (n = 96) were classified as human isolates and 43.75% of the isolates were classified as nonhuman isolates; in the nonhuman species group (n = 223), 7.62% of the isolates were classified as human isolates and 92.38% of the isolates were classified as nonhuman isolates.