Abstract
Background
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia. Genetic polymorphisms are associated with altered risks of AD onset, pointing to biological processes and potential targets for interventions. Consistent with the important roles of microglia in AD development, genetic mutations of several genes expressed on microglia have been identified as risks for AD. Emerging evidences indicate that the expression of a microglia-specific gene MS4A6A is thought to be associated with AD, since AD patients show upregulation of MS4A6A, and its levels correlate with the severity of clinical neuropathology. However, the mechanism linking MS4A6A and AD has not been experimentally studied.
Methods
We performed a meta genome-wide association analysis with 734,121 subjects to examine the associations between polymorphisms of MS4A6A with AD risks. In addition, we analyzed the correlation between MS4A6A and AD-related cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers from our own cohort. Furthermore, we for the first time generated a Ms4a6d deficient APP/PS1 model, and systematically examined pathological changes using high-resolution microscopy, biochemistry, and behavioral analysis.
Results
We identified several new mutations of MS4A6A with altered AD risks, and discovered specific correlation for some of them with the amount of β-amyloid in cerebrospinal fluid. Protective variant of MS4A6A is associated with elevated expression of the gene. Deficient Ms4a6d led to reduced amyloid clearance in the brain. Immunostaining from postmortem AD patients brain revealed selective expression of MS4A6A in microglia. In APP/PS1 mice lacking Ms4a6d, microglia showed markedly diminished envelopment and phagocytosis of amyloid, leading to increased plaque burden, less compact structure, and more severe synaptic damage. Importantly, Ms4a6d deficiency markedly exacerbated inflammatory responses in both microglia and astrocytes by disinhibiting NF-κB signaling. Overexpressing MS4A6A in human microglia cell line promoted gene expression related to plaque-associated responses and diminished inflammation signatures.
Conclusions
Our findings reveal that Ms4a6d deficiency suppresses neuroprotection and worsens neuroinflammation. Sufficient Ms4a6d maybe beneficial for boosting amyloid-related responses and suppressing inflammation in microglia, making it superior than previously reported candidates for microglia modulation. Thus, the elevated MS4A6A levels in AD are likely compensatory and boosting MS4A6A could be an effective treatment.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13024-025-00887-0.
Keywords: Microglia, Alzheimer’s disease, Neuroinflammation, MS4A6A, Ms4a6d
Background
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, while therapeutic benefits from current treatment strategies are still quite limited [1, 2]. Numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified to be associated with changes in risks of developing AD [3, 4], which provide molecular candidates for understanding the mechanism of AD pathogenesis. Among genetic variations associated with AD, rs610932 locates on the MS4A6A (Membrane spanning 4-domains A 6 A) gene and previous studies identified this variant is linked with reduced AD risks in Caucasians [5–7] and Asians [8]. In addition, rs610932 is also correlated with decreased rate of brain atrophy in middle temporal cortex and entorhinal cortex [9, 10]. Furthermore, another SNP rs7232 on the MS4A6A gene shows a congruent protective effect [11], corroborating the involvement of this gene in the process of AD pathogenesis.
However, the mechanism linking MS4A6A to AD is not known. MS4A6A belongs to the MS4A (Membrane spanning 4 A) gene family, which is a group of four-transmembrane-domain proteins with variable cytoplasmic regions. Among them, MS4A6A and MS4A4A are highly expressed in brain tissue. Previous work demonstrated that MS4A6A is selectively expressed in microglia [12–14], and stimulation by amyloid pathologies leads to elevated expressions [15–17]. Consistently, elevated MS4A6A expression is correlated with higher Braak stages in human brains [18], and MS4A6A levels in periphery blood are significantly higher in AD patients compared to controls [19]. Based on these data, it has been proposed that elevated levels of MS4A6A might be detrimental [19], yet this has not been experimentally tested.
Due to its expression specificity, MS4A6A likely affects microglia function. Microglia play complex and important roles in the pathogenesis of AD. Several genetic mutations of microglia-specific genes have been identified as risks for AD, including TREM2 (Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2) [20, 21], CD33 [22] and MS4A [5, 8]. One prominent pathological feature in AD brain is the presence of reactive microglia [23]. These microglia appear to be inflammatory [24] with cytotoxicity [25], which contribute to the degenerative process in AD. On the other hand, as the resident immune cells in the brain, microglia are crucial for clearing β-amyloid (Aβ) via phagocytosis [26, 27]. And recently it has been reported that amyloid plaque-associated microglia could be neuroprotective by encasing neurotoxic Aβ with a physical barrier [28–32], which prevents the accumulation of protofibril amyloid materials around plaques and reduces the development of axonal spheroids pathologies [33]. Previous analysis revealed positive correlation between the expression levels of MS4A6A and TREM2 in human brains [11, 12]. And its mouse homolog Ms4a6d has been shown to act as an inflammation suppressor in periphery macrophages [34]. These studies suggest potential regulation of microglia function by MS4A6A yet direct investigation of its function in the context of AD has not been done.
In this study, we established a mouse model with Ms4a6d knockout in the APP/PS1 background. We provided evidence that Ms4a6d deficiency exhibit diminished microglia wrapping around plaques and reduced phagocytosis, at the same time showed extensive activation of inflammatory pathways. For the first time, our data provide a plausible mechanism underlying the MS4A6A mutations’ link to AD onset. And the striking divergent effect of Ms4a6d implies that activation of this target could be beneficial from both aspects of the microglia functions which is ideal for AD interventions.
Methods
Participants
CABLE cohort
Chinese Alzheimer’s Biomarker and LifestylE (CABLE) was a large population cohort recruited from Qingdao Municipal hospital, including risk factors and biomarkers of AD [35]. The participants are between 50 and 90 years old. Based on their educational level and the results of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), participants were classified as normal cognition and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Illiterate individuals with MoCA values lower than 13 were classified as MCI. For individuals received 1 to 6 years of education, the cutoff value is 19. And for individuals received education over 7 years, the cutoff value is 24. Participants diagnosed with any of the following diseases will be excluded: (1) major neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, head trauma, central nervous system infections; (2) serious psychological disorders; (3) severe systemic diseases like cancer that could influence AD biomarkers levels; and (4) familial hereditary genetic disease. Biochemical tests, neuropsychological tests, and the collection of blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were all performed routinely. An electronic medical record system and an extensive questionnaire were used to gather data on medical history, demographics, and AD risk factor profile. The CABLE study was carried out following the Declaration of Helsinki and the Qingdao Municipal Hospital's Institutional Ethics Committees approved the study's protocol. Participants or their guardians provided the written informed consent.
In this study, 990 elderly adults were included from the CABLE database for analysis. The demographic characteristics of participants were detailed in Supplementary Table S1.
The UK biobank
The UK Biobank is a prospective study that includes 500,000 participants and detailed documentations of baseline characteristics, disease risk factors, past medical history, and long-term follow-up from connected medical data. At the baseline assessment, every participant electronically signed a statement of informed consent. The baseline period of the study was from 2006 to 2010, and participants between the ages of 37 and 73 were followed until their first record of AD diagnosis, death, loss to follow-up, or the last date on which data were still available (November, 2021). The UK biobank research was carried out under the approvement of the National Information Governance Board for Health and Social Care and the North West Multicenter Research Ethics Committee. The current analyses were conducted under UK Biobank application number 19542.
FinnGen
The FinnGen study (https://www.finngen.fi/en) integrates genome and digital healthcare data. All participants provided informed written consent. Detailed quality control criteria can be found in previous study [36].
CSF biomarker assessments
All CSF samples in CABLE cohort were collected by lumbar puncture. The CSF was then processed or stored after instant centrifugation at 2000 × g for 10 min. The thaw/freezing cycle for each sample was limited twice. CSF sTREM2 concentrations were determined with the ab224881 Human TREM2 SimpleStep ELISA (Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) kit from Abcam. CSF Aβ concentrations were determined with INNOTEST® β-Amyloid (1–42) 81583 and INNOTEST® β-Amyloid (1–40) 80462 from FUJIREBIO. P-tau was measured with INNOTEST® PHOSPHO-TAU (181p) 81581 from FUJIREBIO. Total tau was measured with INNOTEST® hTAU-Ag 81579 from FUJIREBIO. Progranulin was detected using the RMEE103R Progranulin Human ELISA kit (Biovendor, Heidelberg, Germany). α-Synuclein was measured via LEGEND MAX™ Human α-Synuclein ELISA Kit with pre-coated plate (No:844101, BioLegend). All biomarker indexes were measured twice by skilled operators who were blinded to clinical data. For these detected proteins, intra-batch variance for technical replicates was < 5%. The inter-batch coefficients of variations were < 20%.
Associations between CSF biomarkers and the SNP
Samples were genotyped using the Infinium Asian Screening Array Kit on the Illumina BEADLAB platform. Standard quality control was then performed, as described in our previous study [37]. Variants located within the MS4A6A gene (chr11:59,939,080–59,952,139 according to GRCh37/hg19) were extracted using the PLINK 2.0 software [38]. An additive linear regression in PLINK 2.0 was applied to investigate the effects of genotypes on CSF biomarkers, adjusted with age, sex, the first two principal components as covariates. The suggestive and genome-wide significant thresholds were P < 1 × 10–5 and P < 5 × 10–8, respectively [39].
Meta-analysis
Three sources of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data were used for this meta-GWAS analysis, including the UK Biobank database, and Kunkle stage1 [6], as well as data from the FinnGen consortium [36].
The imputed SNP genotype data employed in this study were based on the GRCh37/hg19 build [40]. In UK Biobank, we excluded participants who were not of European descent, those with a missing genotype rate exceeding 0.05, or a mismatch data on sex (Data field 31 and 22,001), those with chromosomal disorders, heterozygosity rate outliers, more than ten putative third-degree relatives, and those who are not utilized in computing the principal components. Additionally, multi-allelic variants and call rate < 0.95, a minor allele frequency < 0.01, Hardy–Weinberg P-value < 10–6, or imputation quality score < 0.5 were filtered out. For subsequent analysis, we focused on variants specifically located in the MS4A6A gene. Sample whose age at disease onset or last follow-up was younger than 65 years old were removed. Following the quality control process, a total of 3,076 AD cases and 254,938 controls with available phenotype and covariates data were retained for further investigation. GWAS was performed to test the correlation between variants in MS4A6A and AD risk using logistic regression controlled for age, sex, batch, and the first three principal components in PLINK2.0 [38]. Furthermore, we obtained publicly accessible summary-level data from Kunkle stage 1 (21,982 AD cases and 41,944 controls) and FinnGen consortium (10,520 AD cases and 401,661 controls).
GWAMA software was used to combine summary statistics from the three studies [41].
MS4A6A Overexpression
Human microglial cells (HMC3) were maintained in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS at 37 °C with 5% CO₂. For transduction, cells were seeded at 5 × 105 cells/well in 6-well plates and infected with MS4A6A overexpression lentivirus rLV-CMV-hMS4A6A-3xHA-P2A-EGFP-hPGK-Puro-WPRE at MOI 15 in the presence of 6 μg/mL Polybrene. After 24 h, the medium was replaced with fresh complete medium. Selection with 2 μg/mL puromycin commenced at 72 h post-infection and continued for 10 days until non-transfected controls showed complete mortality.
RNA Sequencing and analysis
Target cells were harvested. Total RNA was isolated with FreeZol Reagent (Vazyme). Libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA Kit and subsequently used for RNA-seq analysis. High-quality reads were aligned to the mouse reference genome using Bowtie2. Expression levels for each of the genes were normalized to fragments per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads using RNA-seq by Expectation Maximization. DEGs (differentially expressed genes) between samples were identified and performed clustering analysis and functional annotation. Differential expression analysis was conducted in DESeq2 (P < 0.05, |log2FC|> 0.5). Gene ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway enrichment were analyzed using ClusterProfiler v4.2.2. Three biologically independent replicates were included for each experimental group.
Construction of plasmids and stable point mutation cell lines
We generated the base editing plasmid used for MS4A6A related SNP mutation. For rs646924: T > C (A > G) mutation, the adenine deaminase/cytidine deaminase MU148 described previously was inserted into the internal 1,249 site of the nickase Cas9 variant SpG [42]. sgRNA was cloned into the pU6-sgRNA-EF1α-UGI-T2A-PuroR plasmid linearized with BsaI; paired oligonucleotides were synthesized, annealed and inserted to construct the sgRNA expression plasmid. The sgRNA sequence used for the rs646924: A > G mutation was 5’-ggcaagggaatagtgagatg-3’.
Human microglial cells were seeded at 600,000 cells per well on 6-well plates. The following day, 1500 ng of the base editor expression plasmid was co-transfected with 500 ng the sgRNA expression plasmid into human microglial cells using the jetPRIME® transfection reagent (Polyplus-transfection) following the manufacturer’s instructions. 24 h post-transfection, the complete medium was replaced with a fresh complete medium containing 2 μg/ml puromycin every day for 4 days. Next, cells were trypsinized and resuspended in complete medium and then sorted into a 96-well plate containing complete medium. Surviving single-cell colonies were transferred into the 12-well plates and cultured for another 9–10 days. After cell expansion, the genome DNA of each single-cell clone was extracted for targeted amplification to examine the mutation status. Cell clones containing the expected SNP mutations were used for functional studies.
qPCR
Total RNA was isolated from edited cultured microglia and unedited control using FreeZol Reagent (Vazyme) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA concentration and purity were determined spectrophotometrically (NanoDrop). After DNase I treatment, 1 μg RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA (HiScript III RT SuperMix for qPCR, Vazyme) with oligo(dT) primers. qPCR reactions were performed in triplicate on QuantStudio 5 (Applied Biosystems) using ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme) in 20 μL total volume. Relative expression was normalized to GAPDH reference genes and calculated using the 2^(-ΔΔCt) method. Primer sequences for target genes (e.g., MS4A6A: F 5′-TGTGGCATGATGGTATTGAGC-3′, R 5′-AGGGTCCTATGAATGGGTAAGC −3′; GAPDH: F 5′-GAAGGGCATCTTGGGCTACAC-3′ R 5′-GTTGTCATTGAGAGCAATGCCA-3′).
Animals
The Ms4a6d−/− mice were generated by Cyagen Bioscience using the CRISPR/Cas9 technique. Exon 2–7 of Ms4a6d were knocked out. APP/PS1 mice were purchased from Aniphe Biolaboratory and crossed with Ms4a6d−/− mice to develop Ms4a6d−/− under APP/PS1 mice background (termed throughout the paper APP/PS1: Ms4a6d −/−, APP/PS1: Ms4a6d +/−, and APP/PS1: Ms4a6d +/+). The genotype of mice was confirmed by Sangon Biotech. Age-matched wild type mice were bought from Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology. In the animal center of Huashan hospital, mice were housed in rooms with temperature and humidity controls (21 ± 1.5℃ and 50 ± 10%) under conventional 12-h light/dark cycle settings. The mice were kept in an environment free of pathogens. All of the experiments comply with the animal study protocol approved by the Fudan University.
Human postmortem brain tissues
The midbrain tissue used in this study was collected from an 89 years old female sporadic Parkinson's disease patient. This patient was autopsied after death and pathologically diagnosed with Lewy body pathology found in the substantia nigra region. The formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimen was a gift from Body Organ Donation Center of Dalian Medical University. The consent for body and organ donation (code number: 00303) was carefully signed by the donor. Her next of kin have provided patient's basic information and clinical history.
Stereo-seq
A total of nine C57BL6/J mice (three for each age group) were initially housed at Jiangsu Cavens Biolaboratory Inc., and maintained at two weeks younger than their designated sacrifice ages: postnatal 2 months (8 weeks), 6 months (24 weeks), and 12 months (48 weeks). Subsequently, they were transferred to Daoke Pharmacology Inc. Facility for a minimum of one week to acclimate prior to sacrifice. Mice were group-housed and, prior to trans-cardial perfusion, anesthetized using 4% isoflurane via face mask. The collected whole brains were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline, dried, and then embedded in optimal cutting temperature (O.C.T.) compound. Brains were cryosectioned at −20°C on a cryostat and immediately snap-frozen at −80 °C. Stereo-seq (SpaTial Enhanced REsolution Omics sequencing) for the spatial trasncriptomic analysis were prepared as described before [43]. In total, three forebrain sections (interaural 3.94 mm, bregma 0.14 mm) and three hindbrain sections (interaural 1.50 mm, bregma −2.30 mm) of 10 μm thickness were collected at each age group, and these sections were promptly adhered to the surface of Stereo-seq chips at −20°C. Tissue sections were fixed in cold methanol for at least 40 min at −20°C and washed three times in 1 × saline sodium citrate before proceeding with Stereo-seq library preparation. All of the procedures were conducted with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Fudan University (approval number: JS-256).
In vivo Aβ Microdialysis
Microdialysis probes with a 2 mm, 100 kDa molecular weight cutoff membrane (CMA 8 microdialysis probes) were stereotaxically implanted into following the coordinates for left hippocampus (bregma: −3.0 mm, 2.5 mm lateral to midline, and 4.0 mm below dura). Perfusion buffer (0.15% bovine serum albumin in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (in mM: 1.3 CaCl2, 1.2 MgSO4, 3 KCl, 0.4 KH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, and 122 NaCl, pH7.35) was perfused at a 1-µl/min flow rate with a syringe pump (CMA). Microdialysates were collected every 60 min at 4 °C using a refrigerated fraction collector. Mice was anesthetized with isoflurane inhalation during the process.
Interstitial fluid (ISF) human Aβ1-x concentrations were quantified hourly via ELISA (No.27729, IBL). Baseline Aβ1-x levels were defined as the mean concentration from hours 3–5 after probe insertion. Then ISF was obtained for 8 h after intraperitoneally injecting each mouse with 6.7 mg/kg of the γ-secretase inhibitor Compound E (Med Chem Express). Aβ1-x values at each time point were expressed as percentage of baseline mean (% baseline).
Preparation of brain sample
All animals received transcardial perfusion with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) after being anesthetized with isoflurane inhalation. The 4% paraformaldehyde fix solution was utilized to fix the right hemispheres for a whole night at 4 °C. Fixed mice brain tissues were sectioned at 45 μm-thick on a vibratomes (Leica, Leica VT1000S). The left hemisphere's cortex and hippocampus were carefully dissected out, then quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen for further biochemical testing.
Immunohistochemistry
Mouse sections were rinsed with PBS three times, then blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin in PBS and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-X 100 in blocking solution. To ensure adequate antigen retrieval, the human specimen was heated at 95 °C in the 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 40 min and washed for 5 min three times after cooling down at room temperature.
Tissues were first incubated with corresponding primary antibodies overnight: Iba1 (1:100, ab5076, Abcam) or (1:500, 019–19741, Wako), Lamp1 (1:200, 1D4B, DSHB), Phospho-Jak2 (Tyr1007/1008) (1:100, 3771S, Cell Signaling Technology), 4G8 (1:1000, 800,701, BioLegend), Phospho-NF-κB p65 (Ser536) (1:1000, 3033S, Cell Signaling Technology), GFAP (1:500, ab4674, Abcam), CD68 (1:200, MCA1957, Bio-rad), MS4A6A-N-terminal (1:50, ab189983, Abcam). Secondary antibodies were chosen according to primary antibodies host species: anti-goat IgG Alexa-Fluor555 (1:500, Invitrogen), anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (1:500, Invitrogen), anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 647 (1:500, Invitrogen), anti-rat IgG Alexa Fluor 555 (1:500, Invitrogen), anti-chicken IgG Alexa-Fluor 488 (1:500, Invitrogen) for 1 h at room temperature at dark. Thioflavin S (Sigma-Aldrich, 2 mg/10 mL) was used to stain plaques for 25 min. Then sections were washed for 5 min three times before mounting on slides with Fluoromount-G® mounting medium or DAPI Fluoromount-G® mounting medium (SouthernBiotech).
Fresh frozen tissue preparation
Adult C57BL/6 J mice were anesthetized with isoflurane. Brains were harvested within 5 min post-sacrifice and maintained on ice. For embedding, tissues were briefly blotted on sterile paper towels, oriented in cryomolds, and covered with O.C.T. compound. Molds were rapidly frozen on a liquid nitrogen platform for 10 min until O.C.T. solidified. Continuous coronal sections were made at −20 °C using a constant cooling microtome (Leica) with a thickness of 20 μm. The sections were adhered to slides treated, dried at room temperature for 30 min, and then stored at −80 °C for long-term preservation.
RNA-scope
RNA in situ hybridization was processed according to the manufacturer's protocol for the RNA-scope Multiplex Fluorescent Reagent Kit v2 (Advanced Cell Diagnostics). The sections were dehydrated in a gradient of 70%, 50%, and 100% ethanol, then incubated with hydrogen peroxide at room temperature for 10 min, and washed twice. Target-specific probes were hybridized sequentially: mouse Aif1-C2 (433,091, Advanced Cell Diagnostics) and Ms4a6d (314,591, Advanced Cell Diagnostics) probes were applied and incubated at 40 °C for 2 h in a HybEZ™ hybridization oven and wash twice. Post-hybridization signal amplification was performed through 2-step amplifier reactions (AMP1-2) as per kit instructions. Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA) was subsequently conducted using the TSA Plus Cyanine Evaluation Kit, with fluorophore-conjugated tyramide (1:750, Advanced Cell Diagnostics) incubated at 40 °C for 30 min protected from light. Then sections were mounted on slides with DAPI Fluoromount-G® mounting medium (SouthernBiotech).
Confocal microscopy
All confocal images were collected through an Olympus system. More than 20 plaques from each mouse were taken for all genotypes. For each staining set, the setting of laser and detector were constant. Using a 60 × oil lens, graphs were captured at 1024 × 1024 pixels with 4 × zoom and a 1 μm z-step. Images were processed with ImageJ or Matlab (Mathworks). Maximum intensity projection of the z-stack for each graph was used for morphological analysis. During analysis, the mice and group data were kept blind.
Plaque shapes were identified using a threshold fluorescence intensity on the Thioflavin S channel that was two standard deviations above the average fluorescence intensity of the image. Activated microglia processes tightly encased amyloid plaques, with Iba1 (Ionized calcium binding adapter molecule 1) expression higher than baseline microglial processes, were characterized as the microglia barrier surrounding compact plaques. The Iba1 fluorescence intensity in the cell body was used as the cutoff value to threshold the Iba1 channel. The percentage of the plaque perimeter covered by the microglia barrier was ascertained by calculating the angle between contact points from the plaque center.
For analysis of the staining of Iba1, CD68, 4G8, phosphorylated JAK2 (Janus kinases 2) and phosphorylated p65, a z-projection of maximal fluorescence intensities across 10 optical slices through the center of the plaque core was made. The intended fluorescent channel was thresholded using “Default” preset in FIJI and fluorescent colocalization analysis were performed using “AND” function for colocalization.
For measuring amyloid plaque distribution, the Thioflavin S fluorescent channel was thresholded using “Triangle” present in FIJI and those plaques were measured using “Analyze Particle” function. The size and intensity of each particle was recorded and analyzed together. The total plaque area was calculated according to the percentage in each region (cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, basolateral amygdala).
Axonal spheroids areas were calculated by thresholding the Lamp1 (Lysosome associated membrane protein 1) channel image with 150% average fluorescence intensity of the background after subtracting the area of plaque in a 10-slice z-projection through the center of plaque core.
Multichannel fluorescence images were acquired on an Olympus confocal system equipped with a 60 × oil-immersion objective. Z-stack images (1 μm step) were processed with maximum intensity projection in ImageJ. Assays were typically performed in parallel with positive and negative controls, to ensure interpretable results. To quantify the RNA expression signal, the fluorescent dots of Aif1 and Ms4a6d within the DAPI-stained cell nuclei in the field of view were recorded. The presence of Aif1 expression indicated the microglia. The proportion of microglia among all the cells expressing Ms4a6d was calculated.
Immunoblotting
Brain tissues were lysate by buffers with Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Beyotime) and boiled with 5 × SDS loading buffer (Beyotime). The protein level of each sample was measured by BCA kit (Beyotime) and each sample was then diluted into the same level before loading. 25ug per lane was the standard protein amount for western blotting in this study. Antibodies and dilutions used in this study include: NLRP3 (1:1000, AG-20B-0014, Adipogen), β-tubulin (1:2000, 10,068–1-AP, Proteintech), PSD95 (1:2000, ab238135, Abcam), Synaptophysin (1:2000, 36406S, Cell Signaling Technology), β-actin (1:2000, 20,536–1-AP, Proteintech). Quantitative analyses were performed on ImageJ software.
ELISA assay
The concentrations of mouse IL-1β (Interleukin-1β) in cortical lysates were tested with ELISA kits (FineTest) under standard procedures. Total protein level of each sample was measured by BCA kits (Beyotime). Samples were measured in duplicates.
Novel object recognition task
The novel object recognition task is carried out in an open field arena using two different types of objects, cylinder and cuboid. During habituation, the animals were free to explore an empty arena for 5 min. Next day, the animals were brought back to the same arena where mice could investigate two identical objects placed at equal distances from the edge for 10 min. Mouse who had a preference of one side was excluded from further testing. 24 h later, mice were then tested for long-term identification recall by allowing them to wander the same field with the familiar object and a novel object in 10 min. The objects and arena were thoroughly cleaned between each mouse experiments. Mice whose total exploration time was less than 20 s were excluded. The time spent exploring each object, as well as the investigation ratio (novel object exploration time/(novel object exploration time + familial object exploration time)) were recorded. Trajectory of each mouse was tracked with DeepLabCutTM and analyzed with MATLAB (MathWorks).
Statistics
The data were shown as mean ± S.E.M. (Standard Error of Mean). For comparisons between two groups, two-tail unpaired Student’s t test was used. For multiple group comparisons, one-way ANOVA tests was employed with post hoc Tukey tests. All statistical analysis were completed on Prism (GraphPad). P values less than 0.05 were regarded significant in this study. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ns = not significant.
Results
MS4A6A SNPs modulate Aβ pathologies and risks for human AD
Previous GWAS studies identified that the T (minor) allele of the rs610932 locus of the MS4A6A gene is associated with a reduced risk for AD [7]. Subsequent studies verified the involvement of this gene in the development of AD in additional Han Chinese and Caucasian cohorts [5, 8, 44]. To further examine the association of other MS4A6A SNPs with AD, we analyzed data using UK Biobank, Kunkle stage 1, and FinnGen cohorts. We identified total 33 overlapping SNPs between these cohorts and 19 of them showed congruent effect among these three studies (I2 = 0%). We were able to replicate previously reported associations between minor alleles at rs610932 (T allele), rs7232 (A allele), rs583791 (C allele) and lower AD risk. Notably, most of these SNPs belong to a group with high linkage disequilibrium (rs7946992, rs7935829, rs2278867, rs12453, rs17602572, rs72918674, rs7232, rs662196, rs634475, rs631853, rs583791, rs632185, rs610932, rs624663) (Supplementary Fig. S1), of which the minor allele all showed association with decreased risk for AD. We further found that four new SNPs (rs638872, rs2243987, rs592496, rs646924) were AD risk loci and one SNP (rs114844671) was protective (Fig. 1a). Together, these results revealed several new SNPs of MS4A6A related to AD, suggesting potentially important roles of MS4A6A gene in AD pathogenesis.
Fig. 1.
Human MS4A6A SNPs are correlated with AD risks and amyloid biomarkers in the CSF. a Meta-analysis of the genome-wide associations between MS4A6A SNPs and risks of AD. Three cohorts were included: UK Biobank, Kunkle Stage 1 and FinnGen consortium. Error bars indicate the upper and lower boundaries of confidence interval. A1 indicates the effect alleles with the frequencies listed under effect allele frequency (EAF). A2 shows the control alleles. Generalized linear regression models were used for statistical comparisons. b Heatmap of association between MS4A6A SNPs and neuropathological biomarkers in CSF. Generalized linear regression models were used for statistical comparisons. Significance is shown on the image: blank, P > 0.05, *, P < 0.05, ***, P < 0.001, ****, P < 0.0001. c Left: Workflow diagram of rs646924: T > C (A > G) editing via single-base editing in HMC3 cells followed by monoclonal cell line isolation. Middle: Validation of rs646924: T > C editing by Sanger sequencing in monoclonal derivatives. Right: qPCR analysis of MS4A6A expression at the rs646924: G locus versus controls rs646924: A (normalized as 1). Two-tail unpaired student’s t-test was used. ****, P < 0.0001. N = 3 repeated experiments. d ISF Aβ1-x obtained by microdialysis from 1-month-old APP/PS1:Ms4a6d +/+ mice (blue) and APP/PS1:Ms4a6d +/− mice (magenta). Baseline Aβ1-x levels were defined as the mean concentration from hours 3–5 after probe insertion. Aβ1-x values after γ-secretase inhibitor Compound E treatment at each time point were expressed as percentage of baseline mean (% baseline). Raw data were fitted with linear trend lines. Two-tail unpaired student’s t-test was used. *, P < 0.05. N = 3 mice for each group. e Left panels show representative confocal images of MS4A6A (yellow) co-stained for IBA1 (red, for microglia) and GFAP (green, for astrocytes) in human brain tissues. Right panels show zoomed microglia and astrocyte images from the boxes in the left. Scale bar: 20 µm. f Representative RNA-scope images and quantification of RNA transcripts of MS4A6A (red) and microglia marker Aif1 (yellow). Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Right panel shows the quantification of Ms4a6d-positive microglia in total Ms4a6d -positive cells. Left panel scale bar: 50 µm. Middle panel scale bar: 10 µm. N = 3 mice. g Quantifications of Ms4a6d expression level in wild type mice at 2-month, 6-month and 12-month based on stereo-seq data. One-way ANOVA tests with post hoc Tukey tests were used. ****, P < 0.0001. a.u., arbitrary unit. N = 6 mice
In order to further investigate the mechanisms underlying these associations, we collected CSF samples from individuals with and without MS4A6A mutations in the CABLE cohort (Supplementary Table S1) and measured the levels of AD-related biomarkers. We identified 31 SNPs of the MS4A6A gene in our cohort, 28 of which have not been previously studied in the context of AD. We found that the majority of MS4A6A SNPs showed significant associations with reduced CSF Aβ42 levels, after controlling for the effects of age and gender (Fig. 1b). While decreased levels of Aβ42 in CSF are often related to increased amyloid deposits in the brain [45, 46], the consistent effects on Aβ42 could also be indications of enhanced amyloid clearance. Importantly, SNPs in the MS4A6A gene seems to selectively affect AD-related pathologies, since we did not observe significant correlation between MS4A6A SNPs and progranulin or α-synuclein levels, and only one SNP (rs7232) correlated with increased soluble TREM2 levels as previously reported [11, 12]. These data strongly suggest that MS4A6A gene likely modulates AD pathogenesis via affecting amyloid pathologies, which we directly examined in vivo.
It is worth noting that all the SNPs reported above locate outside the exon regions of the gene, thus they likely influence disease risk by modulating the expression levels of MS4A6A. To directly test this, we engineered isogenic point mutation rs646924: T > C (A > G) in human microglia cell line (HMC3) using CRISPR-Cas9 (Fig. 1c). We found that rs646924 A allele (risk allele) significantly reduced expression of MS4A6A compared to the G allele (Fig. 1c). These results suggest that decreased MS4A6A transcription could lead to increased AD risk, likely via affecting amyloid-related processes.
To examine the effect of MS4A6A deficiency, we aimed to establish a MS4A6A knockout mouse model. However, the human MS4A6A gene is not present in mice. Previous studies have identified Ms4a6d in mice as a homologue gene for human MS4A6A [34, 47]. We examined the protein sequence and predicted structures of human MS4A6A and the MS4A gene family in mice, and found that Ms4a6d showed the highest similarity to human MS4A6A (Supplementary Fig. S2 and Supplementary Table S2). Therefore, we generated a Ms4a6d knockout mouse model (Supplementary Fig. S3). To directly measure the impact on amyloid-related processes, we cross-bred the Ms4a6d knock-out mice with AD-like transgenic line APP/PS1, and performed intracerebral microdialysis to assess Aβ clearance efficiency in 1-month-old mice before the formation of amyloid deposits. After administering γ-secretase inhibitor to block Aβ production, we observed a decline of Aβ1-x levels in interstitial fluid (ISF), indicating the rate of Aβ clearance. We found that the rate of Aβ clearance was slower in Ms4a6d-deficient mice compared to control APP/PS1 mice (Fig. 1d). These results demonstrated that Ms4a6d deficiency impairs Aβ clearance in the brain.
Microglia lacking Ms4a6d show diminished response to amyloid plaques
We next examined the cellular mechanism underlying the modulation of Aβ depositions by MS4A6A gene. Previous studies indicated that the MS4A6A is selectively expressed in microglia in the brain [47]. We further examined the expression pattern of MS4A6A with human postmortem brain tissues through immunofluorescence staining. Consistent with previous reports, confocal images showed that human MS4A6A was specifically enriched within microglia but not in astrocyte (Fig. 1e). Thus, we hypothesized that MS4A6A may be an important regulator for microglia functions. We also tested the expression pattern of Ms4a6d with in situ hybridization on mice brain sections. The results showed that above 92% on average, and many times 100%, of the Ms4a6d was expressed in microglia. These data indicated that Ms4a6d expression is microglia specific (Fig. 1f), consistent with the results in a latest large-scale proteomic study across murine models [48]. In addition, as previous studies identified elevated levels of MS4A6A is associated with risks of AD onset in humans [19] and elevated expression of Ms4a6d in APP/PS1 mouse [15], we found that there is an increased expression level of Ms4a6d as mice age (Fig. 1g), which could represent a compensatory mechanism to promote amyloid clearance.
We next investigated the effect of Ms4a6d deficiency on amyloid-related pathologies. We found that Ms4a6d deletion did not affect the overall distribution and density of microglia (Supplementary Fig. S4a). Thus, we then focused on microglia-plaque interactions. Our previous work demonstrated a neuroprotective function of microglia by wrapping around amyloid plaques [28, 49]. We then examined the distribution and morphology of plaque-associated microglia with or without Ms4a6d gene. We found that the deficiency of Ms4a6d led to a marked reduction of microglial envelopment of amyloid deposits (Fig. 2a, b and c). Besides, normal microglia form thickened processes that closely follow the boundaries of amyloid plaques. And in Ms4a6d-deficient microglia, processes failed to enlarge or expand, forming a small bulb at the end of each process (Fig. 2d). While this phenotype is similar to what we reported with Trem2-deficient microglia [28], an interesting difference is that Ms4a6d knockout still exhibits plaque-associated microgliosis at a similar level to Ms4a6d wildtype (Fig. 2e), suggesting that the effect of Ms4a6d deficiency was not related to amyloid sensing, but more likely to affect the downstream signaling or reaction triggered by amyloid.
Fig. 2.
Ms4a6d deletion diminishes microglial responses to Aβ pathology in APP/PS1 mice. a Representative confocal images of Iba1-positive microglia (magenta) enveloping the Thioflavin S-positive amyloid plaques (green) in APP/PS1 mice with different Ms4a6d genotypes. b Quantification of microglia coverage, normalized by 360°. Statistical comparisons were calculated with analysis by individual plaques (left) or by mice (right). Dots in the right panel indicate data from individual animal. c Quantification of the Iba1 immuno-staining fluorescent intensities in the near-plaque processes normalized by intensities in the whole cell. d Representative zoomed images of microglia processes near amyloid plaques. Microglia from APP/PS1:Ms4a6d +/+ mice closely wrap around plaques (arrow head), whereas microglia from Ms4a6d deficiency mice show dysmorphic processes with looping structures (white arrows). Right panels show further zoomed images from the boxes on the left. e Quantification of the number of microglia near plaques, normalized by numbers in APP/PS1:Ms4a6d +/+ mice. f Representative confocal images and quantification of Aβ (immunostained with 4G8, green) engulfment within microglial (immunostained with Iba1, magenta) phagosomes (immunostained with CD68, blue). Right panels show further zoomed images from the boxes on the left. g Representative confocal images and quantification of CD68-positive vesicular structures in microglia around plaques. Right panels show separate fluorescence channel from the left image. In all panels, data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Scale bars show 10 µm. N = 5 mice for APP/PS1:Ms4a6d +/+, n = 3 mice for APP/PS1:Ms4a6d +/−, n = 5 mice for APP/PS1:Ms4a6d -/-. One-way ANOVA tests with post hoc Tukey tests for panels b, c and e. Two-tail unpaired Student’s t-test for panels f and g. ns, not significant, **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001, ****, P < 0.0001
Another important protective microglia function is the clearance of amyloid via phagocytosis [27]. Thus, we assessed phagocytosis function in plaque-associated microglia by immunostaining the phagosome marker CD68 [50] and the amyloid fragments. We found that microglia lacking Ms4a6d showed reduced intracellular amyloid contents (Fig. 2f), and correspondingly the levels of phagosomes (Fig. 2g). These findings indicate that in the absence of Ms4a6d, both aspects of microglia protective functions are diminished, pointing to a synergized effect to exacerbate amyloid pathology.
Deletion of Ms4a6d leads to more severe amyloid pathology
Based on the results described above, we examined the impact of Ms4a6d deficiency on amyloid deposition in APP/PS1 mice. We collected brain tissues from 17-month-old mice, and used Thioflavin S staining to label amyloid plaques. Quantification revealed a robust and consistent increase in amyloid depositions in multiple brain regions (Fig. 3a and b). At the same time, the average size of amyloid deposits also enlarged in Ms4a6d-deficient group (Fig. 3c and d). This is consistent with the fact that less amyloid materials were being cleared. In agreement with this view, Ms4a6d-deficient group showed an increase of average fluorescent intensity of Thioflavin S, which is a marker for fibrillar amyloid materials (Fig. 3e) [51]. Interestingly, when we measured the distributions of the fluorescent intensities of plaques, we found that normal mice showed a unimodal distribution of intensities, and Ms4a6d-deficient mice exhibited distributions with multiple peaks, including ones with relatively low intensities (Fig. 3e), suggesting the emergence of diffused amyloid depositions.
Fig. 3.
Ms4a6d-deficiency in APP/PS1 mice increases Aβ burden and markedly reduces plaque compaction. a Representative images of Thioflavin S staining of plaques in hippocampus area in APP/PS1 mice with different genotypes of Ms4a6d. Scale bar: 500 µm. b Quantification of percent area covered by Thioflavin S-positive amyloid plaques in several brain regions of APP/PS1 mice with different Ms4a6d genotypes. c Violin plots of the size distribution of all individual plaques in several brain regions from APP/PS1 mice with different Ms4a6d genotypes. d Quantification of amyloid plaques sizes in cortex. e Violin plots of individual plaques fluorescence intensity distribution in several brain regions of APP/PS1 mice with different Ms4a6d genotypes. f Representative heat-map images based on pixel intensity of Thioflavin S staining show distinct morphology of amyloid plaques in the presence or absence of Ms4a6d. Scale bar: 10 µm. g Example line graphs of the average Thioflavin S fluorescence intensity changes from plaque centers to the edges. Black lines indicate the linear regression lines for the declining segment from the curves. h Quantification of the fitted slopes of the declining segment of fluorescence from plaques of APP/PS1 mice with different Ms4a6d genotypes. In all panels, data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. N = 4 mice for each group. One-way ANOVA tests with post hoc Tukey tests for panels b, c, d, and e. Two-tail unpaired Student’s t-test for panel h. ns, not significant, *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001, ****, P < 0.0001. CTX, cortex; HC, hippocampus; DG, dentate gyrus; CA, cornu ammonis; BLA, basolateral amygdala; TH, thalamus; a.u., arbitrary unit
Our previous studies indicated that microglia wrapping around plaques leads to compaction of amyloid materials. Following the lead that Ms4a6d deficiency caused reduced microglia wrapping and increased diffuse amyloid plaques, we then assessed the effect of Ms4a6d deficiency on the compactness of amyloid deposits by analyzing the Thioflavin S fluorescence intensity decay from the center of the deposits to the periphery regions (Fig. 3f). Compact plaque structures exhibit well-defined, distinct boundaries between the edge of the labeled amyloid deposits and the surrounding brain tissue, with fluorescence values changing sharply when crossing this boundary. In contrast, loose filamentous structures would exhibit a more gradual decline in fluorescence values along the radius as the labeled fibers extending outwards. In order to quantify this difference, we measured the fluorescence intensity decay from all directions for individual plaques, and calculated the slopes for the averaged trace (Fig. 3g). We found that amyloid deposits in Ms4a6d-deficient mice exhibited a more diffused morphology (Fig. 3h). Overall, consistent with the expected phenotypes from reduced microglial envelopment and phagocytosis of amyloid, Ms4a6d deficiency led to exacerbated amyloid deposits in mice.
Ms4a6d deficiency exacerbates neuroinflammation and neurotoxicity in APP/PS1 mice
We next examined the effect of Ms4a6d deficiency in microglia-associated inflammatory responses. Previous studies in periphery macrophages discovered that Ms4a6d is a negative regulator for inflammation [34]. Ms4a6d activates JAK2, which suppresses the downstream NF-κB (nuclear factor κB) activation and subsequent inflammatory responses. We hypothesized that similar signaling pathway exists in the microglia in the brain (Fig. 4a) and examined the presence of phosphorylated JAK2 in control and Ms4a6d deficient APP/PS1 mice using immunostaining. We found that plaque associated microglia exhibited substantial accumulation of phosphorylated JAK2 in the processes adjacent to Aβ deposits and soma, and this activation of JAK2 was diminished in Ms4a6d deficient microglia (Fig. 4b and c). Furthermore, we found that Ms4a6d deficient microglia showed pronounced phosphorylated p65 (Fig. 4d and e), an indication of NF-κB activation [52]. These data support our view that Ms4a6d acts as a negative regulator of inflammation in microglia. Interestingly, with immunostaining of phosphorylated p65, we observed elevated signals in Ms4a6d knockout mice following astrocytic processes (Fig. 4f and g), suggesting an up-regulation of inflammatory cytokines released from Ms4a6d deficient microglia.
Fig. 4.
Ms4a6d deficiency dampens JAK2 signaling and promotes neuroinflammation. a Diagram of membrane Ms4a6d downstream signaling: Ms4a6d activates JAK2 phosphorylation, leading to the inhibition of p65 phosphorylation, production of NLRP3 and IL-1β. b-c Representative images and quantification of immunostaining of phosphorylated JAK2 (yellow) in microglia (magenta) around amyloid plaques (green). Prominent staining can be observed in microglia cell bodies (left) and processes (middle), which is absent in microglia lacking Ms4a6d (right). Lower panels show zoomed images from the boxes above. d-e Representative images and quantification of p65 phosphorylation (cyan) in processes adjacent to Aβ deposits (green) and somata of microglia (magenta) in the presence or absence of Ms4a6d. Right panels show zoomed images from the boxes. f-g Representative images and quantification of p65 phosphorylation accumulated in astrocytes (immunostained with GFAP, red) in the presence or absence of Ms4a6d. Right panels show zoomed images from the boxes. h-i Western blot images of NLRP3 in cortex and associated quantification. The experiments were replicated for three times. Uncropped gels or western blots can be found at Supplementary Fig. S7. j IL-1β levels in the cortex from wildtype, APP/PS1:Ms4a6d +/+ or APP/PS1:Ms4a6d -/- mice brains as measured by ELISA. In all panels, data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Bars: 10 µm. For panels c, e and g, N = 5 mice for each group. N = 7 mice for each group in j. Two-tail unpaired Student’s t-test for panels c, e and g. One-way ANOVA tests with post hoc Tukey tests for panels i and j. *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001, ****, P < 0.0001
Activation of NF-κB signaling is associated with subsequent activation of NLRP3 (Nod-like receptor pyrin domain containing 3), which is a critical regulator for inflammasome that controls the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β in AD [53, 54]. We then measured the expression levels of NLRP3 in brain tissues from control and Ms4a6d knockout mice using immunoblotting (Fig. 4h). APP/PS1 mice lacking Ms4a6d showed robust elevation of NLRP3 expression compared to control APP/PS1 mice. (Fig. 4i). Furthermore, we measured the levels of IL-1β using a commercially available ELISA kit and found concurrent increase in IL-1β levels in the brains of Ms4a6d knockout APP/PS1 mice (Fig. 4j).
The above results indicated that Ms4a6d deficiency leads to more severe amyloid pathology and microglia-associated neuroinflammation, suggesting that amyloid-induced neurotoxicity may be exacerbated. We next measured the degrees of neurotoxicity with multiple metrics. We have previously established a link between microglia envelopment of plaques and the surrounding axonal spheroids [28, 49], which directly disrupts axonal conduction that is important for neural network functions [33]. Thus, we measured the volume of axonal spheroids around individual amyloid plaques using immunostaining of Lamp1. We found that Ms4a6d deficiency led to an increase in plaque-associated spheroids compared to control group (Fig. 5a and b). In addition, we observed a reduction of postsynaptic marker PSD-95 (Postsynaptic density protein 95) in the brains from Ms4a6d knockout mice, while no change was found in pre-synaptic markers or neuronal cell bodies (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Fig. S4b).
Fig. 5.
Ms4a6d deficiency exacerbates plaque-associated axonal spheroids, synapse loss and cognitive deficit. a Representative images of Lamp1-immunolabeled axonal spheroids (gray) around plaques (green). Scale bar: 10 µm. b Quantification of average spheroids size analyzed by individual plaques (left) or by mice (right). Each dot on the right indicates data from individual mouse. N = 6 mice for each group. c Western blot example images of pre-synaptic marker synaptophysin and post-synaptic marker PSD-95 in hippocampus and the associated quantification. Experiments were replicated for three times. Uncropped gels or western blots can be found at Supplementary Fig. S8. d Heatmap of the mice’s trajectories during in novel object recognition tests. The green and red boxes represent the boundaries of the familial and novel object, respectively. N = 10 mice for each group. e Left semicircular section: differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between MS4A6A over-expression and control groups. (red: log2FC > 0.5; purple: log2FC < −0.5). Right semicircular section: biological pathways with significant differential regulation. f Heatmaps of gene sets for inflammation, homeostasis, and disease-associated microglia functions. Color scale represents z-scores of expression levels. Lower panel shows averaged expression from the corresponding gene sets. N = 3 repeated experiments. In all panels, data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Two-tail unpaired Student’s t-test for panel b. One-way ANOVA tests with post hoc Tukey tests for panels d and e. ns, not significant, *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001, ****, P < 0.0001. a.u., arbitrary unit
Finally, we conducted behavioral assessments on Ms4a6d-knockout mice. Utilizing the novel object recognition test, we mapped the trajectories of the mice in an open field containing both familiar and novel objects. The heat maps provided a visualization of the changes in the mice's positions, with red indicating longer durations spent in specific areas. Our findings revealed that, compared to age-matched APP/PS1 mice, the Ms4a6d-knockout mice exhibited a decreased proportion of their total exploration time on the novel object (Fig. 5d). This lack of preference for the novel object suggests more severe cognitive impairment in the Ms4a6d-knockout mice.
The above results indicated that MS4A6A/Ms4a6d deficiency could disrupt microglia response to amyloid plaques thus exacerbating the risks of developing AD. It is thus possible that enhancing MS4A6A expression could provide a protective effect. To explore this possibility, we performed MS4A6A overexpression in the HMC3 cell line. RNA sequencing of MS4A6A overexpressed cells revealed 851 DEGs (FDR < 0.1, |log2FC|> 0.5) (Supplementary Fig. S5, Supplementary Material 2). MS4A6A overexpression exerted a broad range of gene expression regulation for microglia including inflammatory signaling pathways (e.g., NF-κB and response to LPS), glial activation, protein kinase activity regulation (regulation of phosphorylation), phagocytosis-related pathways (encapsulating), and migration-associated modules (Fig. 5e). Consistent with our results, we find the general effect of MS4A6A to be anti-inflammation and at the same time activating plaque-responsive genes such as TREM2 (Fig. 5f) [55]. This is consistent with prior reports of coordinated MS4A-TREM2 upregulation in protective microglial states [12], supporting the potential protective effect of MS4A6A upregulation.
Altogether, these data indicated that Ms4a6d deficiency disrupts microglia phagocytosis and envelopment of amyloid, and exacerbates neuroinflammation and neurotoxicity.
Discussion
Although the link between MS4A6A mutations and AD has been previously identified [5, 8, 44], the cellular mechanism underlying the involvement of this gene and AD pathogenesis is not known. A prior study identified increased levels of plasma MS4A6A in human AD patients and argued that MS4A6A inhibition could be therapeutically beneficial [19]. Utilizing a knockout model of the homologue gene Ms4a6d in mice, we found that Ms4a6d is a master switch controlling microglia response to amyloid pathology. Lacking Ms4a6d greatly diminishes microglia clearance of amyloid via phagocytosis, and the neuroprotective barrier function that insulates and compresses plaques. At the same time, Ms4a6d deficiency exacerbates plaque-associated inflammatory responses in microglia. All these phenotypes point to a congruent effect that Ms4a6d deficiency promotes the pathogenesis of AD, thus it is likely that the upregulation seen with aging and in AD patients are compensatory mechanisms. Interestingly, the disruption of microglia barrier and exacerbated axonal spheroids we observed with Ms4a6d knockout has been a recurring theme related to AD genetic risks, including TREM2 R47H and APOE4 [28, 31, 56]. These data suggest that pathologies such as axonal spheroids could be a common mechanism for AD pathogenesis [33]. Previous GWAS studies reported several protective mutations of MS4A6A, and our results reported novel risk alleles. All these loci locate on the non-coding sequences. Thus, they likely modulate AD risks by changing the expression level of MS4A6A as we showed for rs646924. While our current study indicates that MS4A6A deficiency disrupts microglial protective function and enhances inflammation, future studies are required to elucidate the precise mechanisms correspond to individual mutations on the MS4A6A gene.
We propose that enhancing MS4A6A function could be an ideal therapeutic target for modulating microglia to treat AD (Supplementary Fig. S6). Despite ample evidence with human genetics and mouse models, no microglia-specific target is currently available for AD treatment. Previous clinical trials aiming to suppress neuroinflammation as AD treatment did not yield positive results [57–59], indicating that broad-spectrum inhibition of microglial activity may not be an effective target. Furthermore, several studies have attempted to deplete inflammatory microglia with pharmacological antagonists of colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor [60]. This approach effectively depletes microglia in the brain, but the results on AD pathology are mixed. While reduced plaque depositions and improved cognition have been reported in some studies, microglia depletion can lead to acceleration of plaque growth [61], more diffuse amyloid structures [62–66], and exacerbated axonal spheroids as well as cerebral amyloid angiopathy [67–69].
Additionally, current passive anti-Aβ immunization approach also alters microglial function [70]. Antibodies against Aβ-peptide attract microglia to amyloid pathologies via the Fc fragment to boost clearance [71–73] and microglia barrier [49]. But activation of the Fc receptor in microglia also induces heightened inflammation [74–76], which could contribute to neuronal damages associated with this treatment [77]. Another treatment approach that specifically engages microglia is the recently developed activation antibody for TREM2 [78–80]. These antibodies act by promoting the interaction between TREM2 and the downstream DAP12 (DNAX-activating protein of 12 kDa) adapter, leading to increased microglial encapsulation and phagocytosis of amyloid deposits [79, 81, 82]. However, some studies also reported that TREM2 activation enhances neuroinflammation [83–86]. Therefore, effective intervention should ideally have differential effect on the divergent functions of microglia, yet currently such approach is not available.
Other potential targets for modulating microglia include NLRP3 [53] and HK2 (Hexokinase 2) [26]. NLRP3 is crucial for inflammasome formation. And NLRP3 knockout reduces neuroinflammation and increase phagocytosis, yet it does not seem to affect microglial encapsulation of amyloid deposits [54]. HK2 is an essential enzyme for glycolysis. And HK2 knockout alters microglial metabolism, enhancing phagocytosis but also increasing inflammation [87]. In contrast, we found that Ms4a6d knockout in mice inhibits microglial encapsulation and phagocytosis and increases inflammation. Thus, it is possible that boosting MS4A6A in microglia would be beneficial for both aspects. Interestingly, a recent analysis of MS4A4A polymorphism revealed similar phenotypes of suppressed inflammation and enhanced phagocytosis, despite low similarity in their protein sequences [88]. Future studies are required to elucidate the distinct and related functions of these genes.
This study had several limitations. Firstly, although the mouse homologue Ms4a6d shows the highest similarity, MS4A6A generates multiple isoforms that likely serve different functions. Future studies are required to dissect this diversity in details. Secondly, this study illustrated that Ms4a6d deficiency regulated both microglia functions, while it remains to be determined whether Ms4a6d overexpression could be beneficial in vivo. Thirdly, high quality antibody for Ms4a6d would greatly facilitate the functional study of this gene. Future research identifying effective ways of activating MS4A6A could potentially constitute a novel approach for microglia modulation for treating AD.
Conclusions
Our study reported several novel genetic polymorphisms on human MS4A6A gene that are associated with altered risks for AD onset and human Aβ level in CSF. MS4A6A deficiency in microglia blocks neuroprotection and worsens neurotoxicity which is a key modulator for AD pathogenesis. We pointed out an exciting possibility that boosting MS4A6A could achieve precise regulations of microglia function that are beneficial in both aspects. Future development of feasible approaches on this target could likely be effective in preventing the development of AD.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the support from the ZHANGJIANG LAB, Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Institute, and the State Key Laboratory of Neurobiology and Frontiers Center for Brain Science of Ministry of Education, Fudan University. Figures 1c, and 4a and Supplementary Figure S6 were created with BioRender.com.
Abbreviations
- AD
Alzheimer’s disease
- SNP
Single nucleotide polymorphism
- MS4A6A
Membrane spanning 4-domains A 6A
- TREM2
Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2
- MS4A
Membrane spanning 4 A
- Aβ
β-Amyloid
- CABLE
Chinese Alzheimer’s Biomarker and LifestylE
- MoCA
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
- MCI
Mild cognitive impairment
- CSF
Cerebrospinal fluid
- ISF
Interstitial fluid
- ELISA
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- GWAS
Genome-wide association studies
- O.C.T.
Optimal cutting temperature
- Stereo-seq
SpaTial Enhanced REsolution Omics sequencing
- PBS
Phosphate-buffered saline
- Iba1
Ionized calcium binding adapter molecule 1
- Lamp1
Lysosome associated membrane protein 1
- JAK2
Janus kinases 2
- IL-1β
Interleukin-1β
- S.E.M.
Standard Error of Mean
- NF-κB
Nuclear factor κB
- NLRP3
Nod-like receptor pyrin domain containing 3
- PSD95
Postsynaptic density protein 95
- DEG
Differentially expressed genes
- HK2
Hexokinase 2
Authors’ contributions
H.S.J., P.Y., J.T.Y. conceptualized and designed the experiments. H.S.J., conducted the molecular studies, animal operation, analysis, interpretation of the immunofluorescence data, with support from S.S.H., Y.T.L, K.M.W., and C.Y.W.. Y.L. and T.L.C. performed the gene-editing experiments. H.S.J., Y.J.G., L.Y.H., and B.S.W. analyzed cohort data and visualized results. P.P.L. analyzed the transcriptome data and visualized the results. Y.N.H. analyzed spatial transcriptomic data and visualized results. K.M.W. provided and handled human tissue. P.Y., J.T.Y. supervised the study. H.S.J., P.Y. prepared the original draft. H.S.J., P.Y., J.T.Y revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
J.T.-Y was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071201), Science and Technology Innovation 2030 Major Projects (2022ZD0211600), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (2023SHZDZX02), and Shanghai Municipal Health Commission Emerging Interdisciplinary Research Project (2022JC01). P.Y. was additionally supported by Shanghai Pilot Program for Basic Research – FuDan University 21TQ1400100 (22TQ019), the Lingang Laboratory (grant no. LG-QS-202203–09) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (32371036).
Data availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The CABLE study was carried out following the Declaration of Helsinki and the Qingdao Municipal Hospital's Institutional Ethics Committees approved the study's protocol. The current analyses were conducted under UK Biobank application number 19542. All of the experiments comply with the animal study protocol approved by the Fudan University. The consent for human body and organ donation (code number: 00303) was carefully signed by the donor.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Peng Yuan, Email: pyuan@fudan.edu.cn.
Jin-Tai Yu, Email: jintai_yu@fudan.edu.cn.
References
- 1.van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, Bateman RJ, Chen C, Gee M, et al. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:9–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sims JR, Zimmer JA, Evans CD, Lu M, Ardayfio P, Sparks J, et al. Donanemab in Early symptomatic alzheimer disease: the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;330:512–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sims R, Hill M, Williams J. The multiplex model of the genetics of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:311–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Migliore L, Coppedè F. Gene-environment interactions in Alzheimer disease: the emerging role of epigenetics. Nat Rev Neurol. 2022;18:643–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jansen IE, Savage JE, Watanabe K, Bryois J, Williams DM, Steinberg S, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk. Nat Genet. 2019;51:404–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kunkle BW, Grenier-Boley B, Sims R, Bis JC, Damotte V, Naj AC, et al. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat Genet. 2019;51:414–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hollingworth P, Harold D, Sims R, Gerrish A, Lambert J-C, Carrasquillo MM, et al. Common variants at ABCA7, MS4A6A/MS4A4E, EPHA1, CD33 and CD2AP are associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2011;43:429–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tan L, Yu J-T, Zhang W, Wu Z-C, Zhang Q, Liu Q-Y, et al. Association of GWAS-linked loci with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in a northern Han Chinese population. Alzheimers Dement J Alzheimers Assoc. 2013;9:546–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ma J, Zhang W, Tan L, Wang H-F, Wan Y, Sun F-R, et al. MS4A6A genotypes are associated with the atrophy rates of Alzheimer’s disease related brain structures. Oncotarget. 2016;7:58779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ramirez LM, Goukasian N, Porat S, Hwang KS, Eastman JA, Hurtz S, et al. Common variants in ABCA7 and MS4A6A are associated with cortical and hippocampal atrophy. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;39:82–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hou XH, Bi YL, Tan MS, Xu W, Li JQ, Shen XN, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies Alzheimer’s risk variant in MS4A6A influencing cerebrospinal fluid sTREM2 levels. Neurobiol Aging. 2019;84:241.e13-241.e20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Deming Y, Filipello F, Cignarella F, Cantoni C, Hsu S, Mikesell R, et al. The MS4A gene cluster is a key modulator of soluble TREM2 and Alzheimer’s disease risk. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11:eaau2291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lopes K de P, Snijders GJL, Humphrey J, Allan A, Sneeboer MAM, Navarro E, et al. Genetic analysis of the human microglial transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies. Nat Genet. 2022;54:4–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 14.Novikova G, Kapoor M, Tcw J, Abud EM, Efthymiou AG, Chen SX, et al. Integration of Alzheimer’s disease genetics and myeloid genomics identifies disease risk regulatory elements and genes. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Matarin M, Salih DA, Yasvoina M, Cummings DM, Guelfi S, Liu W, et al. A genome-wide gene-expression analysis and database in transgenic mice during development of amyloid or tau pathology. Cell Rep. 2015;10:633–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Smith AM, Davey K, Tsartsalis S, Khozoie C, Fancy N, Tang SS, et al. Diverse human astrocyte and microglial transcriptional responses to Alzheimer’s pathology. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2022;143:75–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mancuso R, Fattorelli N, Martinez-Muriana A, Davis E, Wolfs L, Van Den Daele J, et al. Xenografted human microglia display diverse transcriptomic states in response to Alzheimer’s disease-related amyloid-β pathology. Nat Neurosci. 2024;27:886–900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Martiskainen H, Viswanathan J, Nykänen NP, Kurki M, Helisalmi S, Natunen T, et al. Transcriptomics and mechanistic elucidation of Alzheimer’s disease risk genes in the brain and in vitro models. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(1221):e15-28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Proitsi P, Lee SH, Lunnon K, Keohane A, Powell J, Troakes C, et al. Alzheimer’s disease susceptibility variants in the MS4A6A gene are associated with altered levels of MS4A6A expression in blood. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35:279–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jonsson T, Stefansson H, Steinberg S, Jonsdottir I, Jonsson PV, Snaedal J, et al. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:107–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guerreiro R, Wojtas A, Bras J, Carrasquillo M, Rogaeva E, Majounie E, et al. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:117–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bradshaw EM, Chibnik LB, Keenan BT, Ottoboni L, Raj T, Tang A, et al. CD33 Alzheimer’s disease locus: altered monocyte function and amyloid biology. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:848–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Leng F, Edison P. Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: where do we go from here? Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17:157–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Keren-Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, Matcovitch-Natan O, Dvir-Szternfeld R, Ulland TK, et al. A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell. 2017;169:1276-1290.e17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Haney MS, Pálovics R, Munson CN, Long C, Johansson PK, Yip O, et al. APOE4/4 is linked to damaging lipid droplets in Alzheimer’s disease microglia. Nature. 2024;628:154–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Leng L, Yuan Z, Pan R, Su X, Wang H, Xue J, et al. Microglial hexokinase 2 deficiency increases ATP generation through lipid metabolism leading to β-amyloid clearance. Nat Metab. 2022;4:1287–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Solé-Domènech S, Cruz DL, Capetillo-Zarate E, Maxfield FR. The endocytic pathway in microglia during health, aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;32:89–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yuan P, Condello C, Keene CD, Wang Y, Bird TD, Paul SM, et al. TREM2 haplodeficiency in mice and humans impairs the microglia barrier function leading to decreased amyloid compaction and severe axonal dystrophy. Neuron. 2016;90:724–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Condello C, Yuan P, Schain A, Grutzendler J. Microglia constitute a barrier that prevents neurotoxic protofibrillar Ab42 hotspots around plaques. Nat Commun. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Wang Y, Ulland TK, Ulrich JD, Song W, Tzaferis JA, Hole JT, et al. TREM2-mediated early microglial response limits diffusion and toxicity of amyloid plaques. J Exp Med. 2016;213:667–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ulrich JD, Ulland TK, Mahan TE, Nyström S, Nilsson KP, Song WM, et al. ApoE facilitates the microglial response to amyloid plaque pathology. J Exp Med. 2018;215:1047–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huang Y, Happonen KE, Burrola PG, O’Connor C, Hah N, Huang L, et al. Microglia use TAM receptors to detect and engulf amyloid β plaques. Nat Immunol. 2021;22:586–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yuan P, Zhang M, Tong L, Morse TM, McDougal RA, Ding H, et al. PLD3 affects axonal spheroids and network defects in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2022;612:328–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Huang X, Feng Z, Jiang Y, Li J, Xiang Q, Guo S, et al. VSIG4 mediates transcriptional inhibition of Nlrp3 and Il-1β in macrophages. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaau7426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hu H-Y, Hu H, Jiang J, Bi Y-L, Sun Y, Ou Y-N, et al. Echocardiographic measures of the left heart and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease pathology in cognitively intact adults: The CABLE study. Alzheimers Dement J Alzheimers Assoc. 2024;20:3943–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kurki MI, Karjalainen J, Palta P, Sipilä TP, Kristiansson K, Donner KM, et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature. 2023;613:508–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ge YJ, Chen SD, Wu BS, Zhang YR, Wang J, He XY, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies ancestry-specific loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement J Alzheimers Assoc. 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. GigaScience. 2015;4:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Risch N, Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science. 1996;273:1516–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D, Band G, Elliott LT, Sharp K, et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature. 2018;562:203–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mägi R, Morris AP. GWAMA: software for genome-wide association meta-analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li S, Yuan B, Cao J, Chen J, Chen J, Qiu J, et al. Docking sites inside Cas9 for adenine base editing diversification and RNA off-target elimination. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen A, Liao S, Cheng M, Ma K, Wu L, Lai Y, et al. Spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas of mouse organogenesis using DNA nanoball-patterned arrays. Cell. 2022;185:1777-1792.e21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Li JQ, Wang HF, Zhu XC, Sun FR, Tan MS, Tan CC, et al. GWAS-linked loci and neuroimaging measures in alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54:146–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Olsson B, Lautner R, Andreasson U, Öhrfelt A, Portelius E, Bjerke M, et al. CSF and blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:673–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Fagan AM. Fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a006221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mattiola I, Mantovani A, Locati M. The tetraspan MS4A family in homeostasis, immunity, and disease. Trends Immunol. 2021;42:764–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sharma K, Schmitt S, Bergner CG, Tyanova S, Kannaiyan N, Manrique-Hoyos N, et al. Cell type- and brain region-resolved mouse brain proteome. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:1819–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Condello C, Yuan P, Schain A, Grutzendler J. Microglia constitute a barrier that prevents neurotoxic protofibrillar Aβ42 hotspots around plaques. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Walker DG, Lue L-F. Immune phenotypes of microglia in human neurodegenerative disease: challenges to detecting microglial polarization in human brains. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7:56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.McLellan ME, Kajdasz ST, Hyman BT, Bacskai BJ. In vivo imaging of reactive oxygen species specifically associated with thioflavine S-positive amyloid plaques by multiphoton microscopy. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2003;23:2212–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Afonina IS, Zhong Z, Karin M, Beyaert R. Limiting inflammation—the negative regulation of NF-κB and the NLRP3 inflammasome. Nat Immunol. 2017;18:861–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Halle A, Hornung V, Petzold GC, Stewart CR, Monks BG, Reinheckel T, et al. The NALP3 inflammasome is involved in the innate immune response to amyloid-beta. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:857–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Heneka MT, Kummer MP, Stutz A, Delekate A, Schwartz S, Vieira-Saecker A, et al. NLRP3 is activated in Alzheimer’s disease and contributes to pathology in APP/PS1 mice. Nature. 2013;493:674–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Martins-Ferreira R, Calafell-Segura J, Leal B, Rodríguez-Ubreva J, Martínez-Saez E, Mereu E, et al. The human microglia atlas (HuMicA) unravels changes in disease-associated microglia subsets across neurodegenerative conditions. Nat Commun. 2025;16:739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Liu CC, Wang N, Chen Y, Inoue Y, Shue F, Ren Y, et al. Cell-autonomous effects of APOE4 in restricting microglial response in brain homeostasis and Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Immunol. 2023;24:1854–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Alzheimer’s Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial Research Group. Results of a follow-up study to the randomized Alzheimer’s Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT). Alzheimers Dement J Alzheimers Assoc. 2013;9:714–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wilcock GK, Black SE, Hendrix SB, Zavitz KH, Swabb EA, Laughlin MA, et al. Efficacy and safety of tarenflurbil in mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a randomised phase II trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:483–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Green RC, Schneider LS, Amato DA, Beelen AP, Wilcock G, Swabb EA, et al. Effect of tarenflurbil on cognitive decline and activities of daily living in patients with mild Alzheimer disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;302:2557–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Elmore MRP, Najafi AR, Koike MA, Dagher NN, Spangenberg EE, Rice RA, et al. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling is necessary for microglia viability, unmasking a microglia progenitor cell in the adult brain. Neuron. 2014;82:380–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gratuze M, Chen Y, Parhizkar S, Jain N, Strickland MR, Serrano JR, et al. Activated microglia mitigate Aβ-associated tau seeding and spreading. J Exp Med. 2021;218:e20210542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Spangenberg E, Severson PL, Hohsfield LA, Crapser J, Zhang J, Burton EA, et al. Sustained microglial depletion with CSF1R inhibitor impairs parenchymal plaque development in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Spangenberg EE, Lee RJ, Najafi AR, Rice RA, Elmore MRP, Blurton-Jones M, et al. Eliminating microglia in Alzheimer’s mice prevents neuronal loss without modulating amyloid-β pathology. Brain J Neurol. 2016;139:1265–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Grathwohl SA, Kälin RE, Bolmont T, Prokop S, Winkelmann G, Kaeser SA, et al. Formation and maintenance of Alzheimer’s disease beta-amyloid plaques in the absence of microglia. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:1361–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Olmos-Alonso A, Schetters STT, Sri S, Askew K, Mancuso R, Vargas-Caballero M, et al. Pharmacological targeting of CSF1R inhibits microglial proliferation and prevents the progression of Alzheimer’s-like pathology. Brain J Neurol. 2016;139:891–907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sosna J, Philipp S, Albay R, Reyes-Ruiz JM, Baglietto-Vargas D, LaFerla FM, et al. Early long-term administration of the CSF1R inhibitor PLX3397 ablates microglia and reduces accumulation of intraneuronal amyloid, neuritic plaque deposition and pre-fibrillar oligomers in 5XFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2018;13:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chitu V, Gokhan S, Nandi S, Mehler MF, Stanley ER. Emerging roles for CSF-1 receptor and its ligands in the nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39:378–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zhao R, Hu W, Tsai J, Li W, Gan W-B. Microglia limit the expansion of β-amyloid plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2017;12:47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kiani Shabestari S, Morabito S, Danhash EP, McQuade A, Sanchez JR, Miyoshi E, et al. Absence of microglia promotes diverse pathologies and early lethality in Alzheimer’s disease mice. Cell Rep. 2022;39:110961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wang A, Das P, Switzer RC, Golde TE, Jankowsky JL. Robust amyloid clearance in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease provides novel insights into the mechanism of amyloid-beta immunotherapy. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2011;31:4124–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Doens D, Fernández PL. Microglia receptors and their implications in the response to amyloid β for Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. J Neuroinflammation. 2014;11:48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bard F, Cannon C, Barbour R, Burke RL, Games D, Grajeda H, et al. Peripherally administered antibodies against amyloid beta-peptide enter the central nervous system and reduce pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. Nat Med. 2000;6:916–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wilcock DM, DiCarlo G, Henderson D, Jackson J, Clarke K, Ugen KE, et al. Intracranially administered anti-Abeta antibodies reduce beta-amyloid deposition by mechanisms both independent of and associated with microglial activation. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2003;23:3745–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sun X, Yu X, Zhu J, Li L, Zhang L, Huang Y, et al. Fc effector of anti-Aβ antibody induces synapse loss and cognitive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease-like mouse model. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Fernandez-Vizarra P, Lopez-Franco O, Mallavia B, Higuera-Matas A, Lopez-Parra V, Ortiz-Muñoz G, et al. Immunoglobulin G Fc receptor deficiency prevents Alzheimer-like pathology and cognitive impairment in mice. Brain. 2012;135:2826–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Teeling JL, Carare RO, Glennie MJ, Perry VH. Intracerebral immune complex formation induces inflammation in the brain that depends on Fc receptor interaction. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2012;124:479–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Lemere CA. Immunotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease: hoops and hurdles. Mol Neurodegener. 2013;8:36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Lee CYD, Daggett A, Gu X, Jiang L-L, Langfelder P, Li X, et al. Elevated TREM2 gene dosage reprograms microglia responsivity and ameliorates pathological phenotypes in Alzheimer’s disease models. Neuron. 2018;97:1032-1048.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zhao P, Xu Y, Jiang L, Fan X, Li L, Li X, et al. A tetravalent TREM2 agonistic antibody reduced amyloid pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14:eabq0095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Wang S, Mustafa M, Yuede CM, Salazar SV, Kong P, Long H, et al. Anti-human TREM2 induces microglia proliferation and reduces pathology in an Alzheimer’s disease model. J Exp Med. 2020;217:e20200785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.van Lengerich B, Zhan L, Xia D, Chan D, Joy D, Park JI, et al. A TREM2-activating antibody with a blood-brain barrier transport vehicle enhances microglial metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease models. Nat Neurosci. 2023;26:416–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Schlepckow K, Monroe KM, Kleinberger G, Cantuti-Castelvetri L, Parhizkar S, Xia D, et al. Enhancing protective microglial activities with a dual function TREM2 antibody to the stalk region. EMBO Mol Med. 2020;12:e11227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Price BR, Sudduth TL, Weekman EM, Johnson S, Hawthorne D, Woolums A, et al. Therapeutic Trem2 activation ameliorates amyloid-beta deposition and improves cognition in the 5XFAD model of amyloid deposition. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bouchon A, Hernández-Munain C, Cella M, Colonna M. A DAP12-mediated pathway regulates expression of CC chemokine receptor 7 and maturation of human dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2001;194:1111–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Jain N, Lewis CA, Ulrich JD, Holtzman DM. Chronic TREM2 activation exacerbates Aβ-associated tau seeding and spreading. J Exp Med. 2023;220:e20220654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Ellwanger DC, Wang S, Brioschi S, Shao Z, Green L, Case R, et al. Prior activation state shapes the microglia response to antihuman TREM2 in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:e2017742118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hu Y, Cao K, Wang F, Wu W, Mai W, Qiu L, et al. Dual roles of hexokinase 2 in shaping microglial function by gating glycolytic flux and mitochondrial activity. Nat Metab. 2022;4:1756–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.You S-F, Brase L, Filipello F, Iyer AK, Del-Aguila J, He J, et al. MS4A4A modifies the risk of alzheimer disease by regulating lipid metabolism and immune response in a unique microglia state. Medrxiv Prepr Serv Health Sci. 2023;2023.2.6.23285545.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.





