Abstract
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) have become prominent global health threats, escalating the burden on public health systems. The increasing occurrence of invasive fungal infections is due primarily to the extensive application of chemotherapy, immunosuppressive therapies, and broad-spectrum antifungal agents. At present, therapeutic practices utilize multiple categories of antifungal agents, such as azoles, polyenes, echinocandins, and pyrimidine analogs. Nevertheless, the clinical effectiveness of these treatments is progressively weakened by the emergence of drug resistance, thereby substantially restricting their therapeutic utility. Consequently, there is an imperative need to expedite the discovery of novel antifungal agents. This review seeks to present an exhaustive synthesis of novel antifungal drugs and candidate agents that are either under current clinical investigation or anticipated to progress into clinical evaluation. These emerging compounds exhibit unique benefits concerning their modes of action, antimicrobial spectra, and pharmacokinetic characteristics, potentially leading to improved therapeutic outcomes relative to conventional antifungal regimens. It is anticipated that these novel therapeutic agents will furnish innovative treatment modalities and enhance clinical outcomes in managing invasive fungal infections.
Key words: Invasive fungal infections, Antifungal drugs, Antifungal compounds, Mechanism, Drug resistance, Immunotherapy, Clinical efficacy, Combination therapy strategies
Graphical abstract
The novel antifungal drugs currently in clinical trials block the pathogenicity of fungi by targeting the synthesis of the fungal cell membrane or cell wall, the synthesis of key proteins, and mitochondrial metabolism within fungal cells.
1. Introduction
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs), chiefly attributable to species of Candida, Aspergillus, and Cryptococcus, exhibit substantially higher mortality rates than superficial fungal infections, which are more frequently encountered. These infections have become increasingly urgent global health issues; the World Health Organization has reported a marked rise in incidence, particularly among immunocompromised individuals, patients in intensive care, and those with respiratory disorders during the ongoing pandemic1. Epidemiological analyses indicate that annual fatalities from fungal infections surpass those caused by malaria and breast cancer, with mortality rates rivaling those reported for tuberculosis and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)1. Furthermore, the prevalence of opportunistic fungal infections is a rising trend associated with the expanded use of chemotherapy, immunosuppressive therapies, and broad-spectrum antibiotics2,3.
In clinical practice, most antifungal therapies are designed to disrupt key structural components of fungal cells, notably the cell wall and cell membrane4, 5, 6. These agents include echinocandins, which inhibit β-glucan synthesis in the cell wall; azoles and allylamines, which impair ergosterol biosynthesis; and polyenes, which bind ergosterol to compromise membrane integrity7, 8, 9 (Table 1). Additionally, antifungal drugs targeting intracellular proteins hinder fungal proliferation by inhibiting nucleic acid synthesis, disrupting the electron transport chain, or impairing microtubule dynamics10,11 (Fig. 1, Table 212, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34). Nevertheless, the clinical utility of these therapies is increasingly challenged by the emergence of drug-resistant fungal strains.
Table 1.
Summary of the mechanisms of action and clinical application of traditional antifungals.
| Drug class | Representative drug | Mechanism of action | Target gene (Enzyme) | Clinical application | Common adverse effect | Resistance mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyenes | Amphotericin B (liposomal) | Binds to ergosterol, forming membrane pores | ERG6 (sterol synthase) | Systemic fungal infections (e.g., cryptococcal meningitis) | Nephrotoxicity, infusion-related reactions | Rare; toxicity limits use |
| Nystatin | Binds to ergosterol, disrupting membrane integrity | ERG6 (sterol synthase) | Topical fungal infections (e.g., oral candidiasis) | Local irritation, allergic reactions | Rare | |
| Azoles | Fluconazole | Inhibits 14α-demethylase, blocking ergosterol synthesis | ERG11/CYP51 (14α-demethylase) | Candidiasis, cryptococcosis | Hepatotoxicity, drug interactions | ERG11 mutations, efflux pump overexpression |
| Itraconazole | Inhibits 14α-demethylase, blocking ergosterol synthesis | ERG11/CYP51 (14α-demethylase) | Aspergillosis, histoplasmosis | Gastrointestinal discomfort, hepatotoxicity | ERG11 mutations, efflux pump overexpression | |
| Echinocandins | Caspofungin | Inhibits β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase, disrupting cell wall | FKS1/FKS2 (glucan synthase subunit) | Invasive candidiasis, aspergillosis | Elevated liver enzymes, infusion-related reactions | FKS mutations leading to reduced target affinity |
| Micafungin | Inhibits β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase, disrupting cell wall | FKS1/FKS2 (glucan synthase subunit) | Invasive candidiasis, empirical therapy in neutropenic patients | Elevated liver enzymes, infusion-related reactions | FKS mutations leading to reduced target affinity | |
| Flucytosine | 5-Fluorocytosine (5-FC) | Converted to 5-fluorouracil, interfering with RNA and DNA synthesis | FCY2 (transporter), FUR1 (metabolic enzyme) |
Cryptococcal meningitis (often combined with amphotericin B) | Bone marrow suppression, gastrointestinal discomfort | FCY2 transporter deficiency, FUR1 gene mutations |
| Allylamines | Terbinafine | Inhibits squalene epoxidase, blocking ergosterol synthesis | ERG1 (squalene epoxidase) | Dermatophytosis, onychomycosis | Hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal discomfort | Rare |
This table summarizes the representative drugs, targets, main mechanisms of action, clinical indications and common adverse reactions of traditional antifungal drugs (including polyenes, azoles, echinocandins, flucytosine and acrylamide), and briefly lists the common resistance mechanisms.
Figure 1.
Schematic representation of the mechanism of action of novel antifungal agents currently in clinical trials. Ibrexafungerp and rezafungin predominantly inhibit β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase, thereby preventing glucan synthesis. Nikkomycin Z disrupts chitin biosynthesis by competitively binding to UDP-GlcNAc binding sites. Fosmanogepix exerts its activity by partially inhibiting the Gwt1 enzyme, which interferes with GPI-anchored protein biosynthesis. Opelconazole, isavuconazole, VT-1598, and oteseconazole specifically target fungal CYP51, thereby impairing ergosterol synthesis. MAT2203 and AM2-19 directly bind to ergosterol in the fungal cell membrane, leading to membrane destabilization. Olorofim primarily targets fungal dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, thus disrupting nucleic acid production and inhibiting mycelial elongation. T-2307 exerts a selective inhibitory effect on the respiratory chain complex within yeast mitochondria, resulting in a decline in mitochondrial membrane potential. (Figure created with BioRender.com).
Table 2.
Activity of new antifungal agents currently in clinical trials against common pathogenic fungi.
| Pathogens&novel antifungals | Candida spp. | Aspergillus spp. | Cryptococcus spp. | Mucor spp. | Fusarium spp. | Histoplasma capsulatum | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ibrexafungerp (SCY-078) | √ | √ | × | × | × | √ | 12,13 |
| Rezafungin | √ | √ | × | × | ? | ? | 13,14 |
| Nikkomycin Z | √ | √ | × | √ | × | √ | 15, 16, 17 |
| Fosmanogepix (APX001) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ? | 18, 19, 20, 21 |
| Opelconazole (PC945) | √ | √ | √ | ? | × | ? | 19,22, 23, 24 |
| Isavuconazole | √ | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | 25, 26, 27 |
| MAT2203 | √ | √ | √ | √ | ? | ? | 28 |
| AM-2-19 | √ | √ | × | × | × | 29 | |
| VT-1598 | √ | √ | √ | ? | ? | ? | 30 |
| Oteseconazole (VIVJOA®, VT-1161) | √ | × | √ | √ | × | √ | 13,31 |
| Olorofim | × | √ | × | × | √ | √ | 13,32 |
| T-2307 | √ | √ | √ | × | × | ? | 33 |
| VL-2397 | √ | √ | √ | ? | √ | ? | 34 |
| Legend | Potent activity (√) | No activity (×) | Unkown (?) | ||||
√ Represents a study that reported significant activity of the drug against the corresponding fungi.
× Represents the study reporting that the drug had no significant activity against the corresponding fungi.
? Represents that no studies have reported the activity of the drug against the corresponding true bacteria.
The emergence of fungal resistance is a multifactorial process driven by genetic alterations, adaptive evolution, and both environmental and clinical influences35, 36, 37. Key resistance mechanisms include mutations at drug target sites, increased efflux of antifungal agents, metabolic reprogramming, and biofilm formation38. For example, mutations in the CYP51 enzyme encoded by the ERG11 gene substantially reduce the binding affinity of azole drugs, thereby impairing their efficacy39,40. Similarly, alterations in the FKS gene, which encodes the catalytic subunit of β-1,3-glucan synthase, result in diminished sensitivity to echinocandins41, 42, 43. Additionally, fungi may increase the expression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) or major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporters, promoting drug efflux, lowering intracellular concentrations, increasing drug efflux, and reducing intracellular drug concentrations, further conferring resistance44, 45, 46. Metabolic reprogramming further contributes to resistance, as fungal cells modify the ergosterol composition or activate alternative pathways to bypass drug inhibition47. Moreover, biofilm formation creates a physical barrier that restricts antifungal penetration, thereby exacerbating resistance48,49. Clinical and environmental factors also play significant roles; prolonged or inappropriate antifungal use selects for resistant strains, and cross-resistance further complicates treatment39,40. The spread of resistant strains in hospital settings, compounded by host immunosuppression, ultimately intensifies the challenge of managing fungal infections.
Strategies to combat fungal drug resistance in clinical settings encompass several approaches. First, the development of novel antifungal agents increasingly relies on high-throughput screening and computational chemistry to design and optimize compounds with innovative molecular architectures, thereby circumventing established resistance mechanisms and enhancing therapeutic efficacy50, 51, 52, 53, 54. Second, research on natural products has gained prominence, with considerable efforts focused on isolating compounds with unique antifungal properties from plants, microorganisms, and other natural sources55,56. These bioactive natural substances not only exert direct antifungal effects but also work synergistically with existing therapies, thereby improving efficacy and mitigating the risk of resistance. Additionally, drug repurposing strategies-which involve reexamining the potential antifungal applications of already approved medications by leveraging their well-characterized safety and pharmacokinetic profiles-facilitate rapid clinical translation and broaden treatment options57, 58, 59. Immunotherapeutic approaches are also advancing, as investigations into monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, and other immunomodulatory modalities aim to augment host immune responses and improve resistance to fungal infections (Fig. 2)60, 61, 62. Finally, breakthroughs in genomics and proteomics have enabled the identification of novel therapeutic targets, such as enzymes involved in cell wall biosynthesis, key signaling pathways, and stress response mechanisms, thereby paving the way for precision antifungal interventions63, 64, 65. Collectively, these complementary strategies foster the development of personalized antifungal treatment systems, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs.
Figure 2.
The antifungal immune response is mediated through the coordinated interplay between innate and adaptive immunity. Upon fungal invasion, pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) recognize fungal cell wall components such as β-glucan, thereby initiating the phagocytic activity of effector cells, including macrophages and neutrophils, and promoting the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Subsequently, dendritic cells activate adaptive immunity by presenting fungal antigens to CD4+ T cells via major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) molecules. This process drives the differentiation of Th1 cells, which secrete interferon-γ (IFN-γ) to enhance macrophage-mediated pathogen killing, and the activation of Th17 cells, which promote neutrophil recruitment through interleukin-17 (IL-17). B cells generate pathogen-specific antibodies, such as immunoglobulin G (IgG), facilitating opsonization and enhancing phagocytosis for effective pathogen clearance.
Recent advances in medicine have paved the way for innovative antifungal agents that exhibit robust clinical efficacy in managing invasive fungal infections. This review examines emerging antifungal drugs—many currently in clinical trials or expected to enter clinical evaluation soon—along with promising compounds that may offer novel therapeutic alternatives in the future. These agents are engineered either to target pathways not addressed by conventional therapies or to increase the effectiveness of established targets via innovative mechanisms. In contrast to traditional treatments, the compounds discussed herein confer distinct pharmacological advantages, including unique mechanisms of action, expanded antimicrobial spectra, and improved pharmacokinetic profiles, among other beneficial properties (Fig. 1). Collectively, these advancements have the potential to transform treatment strategies, offering promising prospects for preventing and controlling invasive fungal infections.
2. Traditional antifungal drugs
Conventional antifungal agents are indispensable in the management of fungal infections and primarily consist of polyenes, azoles, allylamines, and pyrimidine analogs55,66. These agents impede fungal proliferation via diverse mechanisms and are extensively utilized to address both superficial and invasive mycoses (Table 1).
Polyenes exhibit antifungal activity by interacting with ergosterol within the fungal cell membrane, thereby compromising membrane integrity and inducing the efflux of cytoplasmic constituents67. Among polyene antifungal agents, amphotericin B and nystatin serve as prototypical examples; notably, griseofulvin, while a conventional antifungal, belongs to a distinct class. Amphotericin B continues to be the primary therapeutic option for severe infections, including cryptococcal meningitis and invasive aspergillosis, although its marked nephrotoxicity substantially restricts its clinical use68. Nystatin is chiefly employed for the treatment of mucosal Candida infections, including oral and vaginal candidiasis, and is favored for topical administration owing to its minimal systemic toxicity69.
Azoles function by inhibiting 14-α-demethylase, thereby disrupting ergosterol biosynthesis and compromising fungal cell membrane stability67. Azoles are classified into first- and second-generation agents on the basis of their chronological development70. First-generation azoles, such as ketoconazole, are now primarily used topically due to their significant hepatotoxicity71. Second-generation agents, including fluconazole and itraconazole, are widely used in clinical practice. Fluconazole is commonly prescribed for Candida infections and cryptococcal meningitis, but has limited efficacy against Candida glabrata and Candida krusei and is associated with a risk of hepatotoxicity70. Itraconazole is effective in treating dermatophytosis and certain invasive fungal infections; however, its oral bioavailability is highly variable and influenced by individual patient factors and food intake72.
Allylamines, which include terbinafine and naftifine, inhibit squalene epoxidase essential enzyme in ergosterol biosynthesis-thereby compromising fungal cell membrane integrity and culminating in fungal cell death67. These agents are predominantly indicated for the treatment of dermatophyte infections, including tinea manus, tinea pedis, and onychomycosis67,73. Nonetheless, given the risk of hepatotoxicity, vigilant monitoring of hepatic function is recommended during therapy.
Pyrimidine analogs, such as flucytosine, exert antifungal effects by disrupting RNA and DNA synthesis, thereby inhibiting fungal proliferation67. Clinically, flucytosine is frequently coadministered with amphotericin B for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis; this combination improves therapeutic outcomes and diminishes the risk of resistance development8. Nevertheless, prolonged exposure to flucytosine may lead to bone marrow suppression, necessitating careful monitoring of hematologic parameters74.
Although conventional antifungal agents remain clinically valuable, each drug class presents inherent limitations, including toxicity, resistance development, and pharmacokinetic challenges. In the context of increasing numbers of drug-resistant fungal strains and increasing clinical demands, the deficiencies of traditional therapies have become increasingly evident. Optimizing current treatment regimens through combination therapy and precise dose adjustments is essential for enhancing antifungal efficacy. Moreover, the development of safer and more potent agents, particularly next-generation triazoles and echinocandins, is critical for overcoming antifungal resistance. With multidisciplinary collaboration and the integration of advanced technologies, significant progress in the management of fungal infections is anticipated, offering more tailored therapeutic options and improved patient outcomes.
3. Novel drugs and compounds that directly target fungi
3.1. Antifungals targeting the cell wall
The fungal cell wall comprises primarily β-1,3-glucan, β-1,6-glucan, chitin, and various proteins, all of which are essential for its structural integrity and mechanical resilience. These components interact to form an intricate network that underpins the overall functionality of the fungal cell75. The cell wall plays dual roles: it acts as a protective barrier against environmental stressors and is critical to fundamental cellular processes such as maintaining cell morphology, facilitating nutrient and ion transport, and modulating signal transduction pathways. Consequently, antifungal therapies that target the synthesis or functionality of these vital cell wall constituents can effectively inhibit fungal growth and reproduction (Table 3)76.
Table 3.
Mechanisms of action of new antifungal drugs currently in clinical trials and the latest clinical trial results.
| Novel antifungal agent | Route of administration | Half-life | Target molecule | Latest clinical progress | ClinicalTrials.gov ID | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antifungals targeting cell wall |
Ibrexafungerp (SCY-078) | Oral (intravenous formulation under development) | 20–25 h | 1,3-β-D-Glucan synthase | Phase III completed for vulvovaginal candidiasis | NCT05399641 |
| Phase III completed for multiple drug-resistant fungi | NCT03059992 | |||||
| Rezafungin | Intravenous | 130 h | 1,3-β-D-Glucan synthase | Phase III for invasive candidiasis | NCT03667690 | |
| Phase II for pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) | NCT05835479 | |||||
| Nikkomycin Z | Oral | 1–2 h | Chitin synthase | Phase II for coccidioidomycosis | NCT00614666 | |
| Fosmanogepix | Oral and intravenous | 20–26 h (IV) 35 h (PO) |
Gwt1 protein | Phase III for candidiasis | NCT04148287 | |
| Phase II for invasive fungal infections | NCT04240886 | |||||
| Antifungals targeting cell membranes |
Opelconazole | Nebulisation | 138 h | CYP51A1 | Phase III for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis | NCT05238116 |
| Isavuconazole | Oral and intravenous | 130 h | CYP51 (lanosterol 14α-demethylase) | Phase IV for invasive fungal disease (IFD) | NCT05630976 | |
| Encochleated amphotericin B (MAT2203) | Oral | – | Ergosterol | Phase III for cryptococcal meningitis | NCT05541107 | |
| Phase II for vulvovaginitis | NCT02971007 | |||||
| VT-1598 | Oral | 80–100 h | CYP51 (lanosterol 14α-demethylase) | Phase I for coccidioidomycosis | NCT04208321 | |
| Oteseconazole (VT-1161,VIVJOA®) | Oral | 138 h | CYP51 (lanosterol 14α-demethylase) | Phase III for vulvovaginal candidiasis | NCT03562156 | |
| Phase III for cryptococcal meningitis | NCT06666322 | |||||
| Antifungals targeting intracellular metabolism |
Olorofim | Oral and intravenous | 8–12 h | Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) | Phase III for invasive aspergillosis | NCT05101187 |
| VL-2397 | Oral and intravenous | 4 h | Ferric ion transporter | Phase II for invasive aspergillosis | NCT03327727 | |
The results of the latest clinical trials from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (March 2025).
3.1.1. Inhibitors of glucan synthase
Glucan synthase, the enzyme that catalyzes β-(1,3)-D-glucan production, is a membrane-associated protein localized at the plasma membrane that harbors conserved catalytic domains known as FKS. The RHO1 GTPase subunit modulates its activity77. Inhibitors of β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase constitute a class of compounds that exert antifungal effects by interfering with the biosynthesis of β-(1,3)-D-glucan76. Given that β-(1,3)-D-glucan is not present in mammalian cells, these inhibitors display remarkable specificity and negligible toxicity. As an essential enzyme for fungal cell wall biosynthesis, glucan synthase is pivotal in preserving cellular architecture and integrity. Mutations in the FKS1 and FKS2 genes result in impaired cellular growth, and simultaneous deletion of these genes precipitates cell death, thereby underscoring glucan synthase as an appealing pharmacological target78. Echinocandin resistance, a significant challenge in antifungal therapy, predominantly originates from genetic mutations affecting β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthesis, especially those affecting the glucan synthase enzyme77. Current efforts in developing glucan synthase inhibitors focus on obstructing the elongation of the glucan polymer by binding to Fks1p, thereby preventing the accumulation of β-(1,3)-D-glucan within the fungal cell wall and promoting potent antifungal activity.
3.1.1.1. Ibrexafungerp (SCY-078)
Ibrexafungerp belongs to a class of drugs known as triterpenoid antifungal agents (Fig. 3). These agents impede the process of synthesizing fungal cell walls by targeting a specific enzyme known as Fks1p, which is the catalytic unit of glucan synthase. In addition, they selectively inhibit an enzyme known as β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase. Compared with conventional echinocandins, ibrexafungerp displays high oral bioavailability, extensive distribution, and minimal cross-resistance to echinocandin-resistant strains, primarily due to the selectivity of its binding site to the synthase79,80 (Fig. 1).
Figure 3.
Chemical structures of novel antifungals. (A) Ibrexafungerp (C44H67N5O4·C6H8O7) is a triterpenoid derivative of the natural product enfumafungin; its pharmacological efficacy is dictated by the intrinsic triterpenoid framework together with specific functional group modifications. (B) Rezafungin (C65H88N8O19) is developed as a derivative of Echinocandin B and features a distinct fatty acyl side chain integrated into its cyclic peptide structure. (C) Nikkomycin Z (C20H25N5O10) is classified as a nucleoside-peptide antibiotic that couples an uracil nucleoside with a dipeptide chain. Notably, its AHA segment bears a high degree of structural similarity to the UDP moiety of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc), enabling occupancy of the chitin synthase substrate binding site, while the HPHT extension further perturbs the enzyme’s active site conformation, resulting in a dual inhibitory mechanism. (D) Fosmanogepix (C18H23F2N3O7P2) incorporates a bisphosphonate moiety, specifically a phosphonate oxybutoxy group, and functions as a prodrug that undergoes hydrolysis by alkaline phosphatase in vivo to yield the active compound manogepix (APX001A); this conversion releases a hydroxyl group that enhances cellular permeability. (E) Opelconazole (C38H37F3N6O3) contains a 1H-1,2,4-triazole ring and shares the central pharmacophore with established triazole antifungals, while its long-chain hydrophobic substituent is designed to improve lipophilicity. (F) Isavuconazole (C22H17F2N5OS) features a 1H-1,2,4-triazole ring; however, the stereochemistry of its side chain (2R,3R) confers precise binding of the triazole moiety to the active site of fungal CYP51. (G) Encochleated Amphotericin B (MAT2203) (C47H73NO17) primarily comprises amphotericin B, which is encapsulated within a nanoparticle shell formed by a phospholipid bilayer or a cholesterol complex that mimics the constituents of fungal cell membranes. (H) VT-1598 (C31H20F4N6O2) employs a combination of a tetrazole ring and a pyridine group to achieve markedly higher affinity for fungal CYP51 relative to the corresponding human enzyme. (I) Oteseconazole (C23H16F7N5O2) is structurally optimized with a tetrazole moiety, multiple fluorine substituents, and a refined stereochemical configuration, thereby enhancing its selectivity toward fungal CYP51. (J) Olorofim (C28H27FN6O2) incorporates essential structural features, including interconnected polycyclic elements and a moiety that selectively binds to the CBD region of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), resulting in potent and selective inhibition of the fungal enzyme. (K)VL-2397 (C40H59AlN10O13) is characterized by a cyclic hexapeptide backbone, an aluminum-chelating center, and siderophore-mimetic attributes, which collectively underlie its pharmacological activity.
Recent in vitro studies have demonstrated that ibrexafungerp has broad-spectrum antifungal effects on diverse Candida species. Notably, it retains substantial efficacy against strains harboring resistance-associated mutations in the Fks subunit12,13,81. Animal models of invasive candidiasis further corroborate its antifungal potency, with significant activity observed across multiple Candida morphotypes, including smooth and nearly smooth variants, as well as Candida albicans82,83. Moreover, ibrexafungerp has proven effective against Candida auris, a priority pathogen recognized by the World Health Organization for its multidrug-resistant profile84,85. In a rabbit neutropenia model, the combination of ibrexafungerp and isavuconazole had synergistic effects, significantly improving survival rates and reducing the fungal load86. Further investigations have indicated that combining ibrexafungerp with amphotericin B offers a considerable advantage in treating drug-resistant CYP51A mutants87 (Table 2).
In June 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ibrexafungerp (BREXAFEMME®) for the indications of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) and for reducing the incidence of recurrent VVC (RVVC)88. The effectiveness and safety of this drug have been confirmed through phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, where it was evaluated for the management of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC)88,89. According to the findings of the VANISH-306 trial, patients treated with ibrexafungerp demonstrated significantly higher rates of clinical resolution, fungal eradication, and overall improvement than those receiving a placebo90,91 (Fig. 4, Table 3).
Figure 4.
Development of novel antifungals. The development process of new antifungal drugs currently in clinical trials, including basic research stage, animal experiment stage, clinical trial stage and official marketing stage.
3.1.1.2. Rezafungin
As a second-generation echinocandin antifungal agent, rezafungin features a choline ether modification at the C5 ornithine site, significantly enhancing its chemical stability and solubility92 (Fig. 3). This drug exerts its antifungal activity by binding to specific regions of Fks1p. By interfering with the transfer of UDP-glucose to the cell wall, rezafungin effectively inhibits the synthesis of β-1,3-glucan93. Although it shares the same binding site as first-generation echinocandins do, its structural modifications enhance interactions with the lipid microenvironment, potentially allowing for a tighter binding that directly disrupts enzyme–substrate interactions, specifically between Fks1p and UDP-glucose94 (Fig. 1). In contrast, first-generation echinocandins act primarily by inhibiting enzyme conformational changes. This mechanistic difference grants rezafungin superior inhibitory activity against resistance-associated mutations, such as Fks1p mutants95. Its optimized solubility further enhances its distribution in biofilms and deep tissues, such as the lungs and central nervous system, thereby improving its efficacy in eliminating cryptic infection foci96.
In vitro studies have validated that rezafungin displays potent antifungal activity against a broad spectrum of pathogens, including strains resistant to standard therapies that frequently pose significant treatment challenges13,14,94. Animal studies have demonstrated its significant inhibitory effects against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., although its activity against Cryptococcus spp. is less pronounced97, 98, 99, 100. Rezafungin offers distinct pharmacokinetic advantages over first-generation echinocandins101. Notably, it undergoes minimal biotransformation in liver microsomes and hepatocytes and has a reduced impact on cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes, significantly lowering the risk of drug–drug interactions. These characteristics make it well suited for complex dosing regimens, particularly in multidrug therapy settings102,103 (Table 2).
Owing to these favorable properties, rezafungin was granted orphan drug status in both the United States and the European Union in 2023, specifically for treating candidaemia and invasive candidiasis in adults with limited or no alternative treatment options. The phase III ReSTORE trial demonstrated that rezafungin provided comparable efficacy and safety to caspofungin, further supporting its potential for clinical use104 (Fig. 4, Table 3).
4. Inhibitors of chitin synthase
Chitin, a polysaccharide105, consists of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) monomers and constitutes an essential structural element of the fungal cell wall106. Chitin biosynthesis is governed by chitin synthase, an enzyme that facilitates the assembly of uridine diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc), which functions as a sugar donor. This enzymatic activity promotes the establishment of β(1→4) glycosidic bonds, thereby enabling the translocation of the newly synthesized polysaccharide across the cellular membrane via transmembrane channels. Once transported, polysaccharides are integrated into the cell wall matrix106. Chitin synthase inhibitors typically disrupt chitin biosynthesis through two main mechanisms. These inhibitors can either compete for the UDP–GlcNAc binding site or bind directly to the enzyme, triggering a conformational change that further inhibits chitin synthesis. This dual mode of action enhances the specificity and potency of these inhibitors107. Given that chitin is absent in both plants and vertebrates, its biosynthetic pathway is considered an ideal target for the development of antifungal agents, as are bactericides and insecticides106,108.
4.1. Nikkomycin Z
Nikkomycin Z (NikZ) is a secondary metabolic compound synthesized by the actinomycete Streptomyces tendae (Fig. 3). The chemical structure of NikZ comprises two principal components: a UDP-like aminohexane carboxylic acid (AHA) segment and a distinctive 4-hydroxypyridine-homothreonine (HPHT) peptidyl segment109. The AHA portion of NikZ is structurally similar to the UDP moiety of UDP–GlcNAc, whereas the HPHT portion is capable of penetrating deeply into the substrate channel of the enzyme, thereby interfering with the extension of the chitin chain. This dual mechanism of action enables Nikkomycin Z to effectively inhibit chitin synthesis, thereby hindering fungal cell wall formation108 (Fig. 1).
In vitro and in vivo experiments confirmed that Nikkomycin Z exhibits robust antifungal activity against a broad spectrum of pathogens. The compound demonstrates efficacy against dimorphic fungi-namely, Histoplasma capsulatum, Coccidioides spp., and Blastomyces dermatitidis-as well as against additional organisms such as Sporothrix spp., Candida albicans, and Aspergillus spp.15, 16, 17. In murine models, Nikkomycin Z achieved superior therapeutic outcomes to those of azole antifungals and amphotericin B for the treatment of systemic coccidioidomycosis and blastomycosis, and it further displayed fungicidal effects within pulmonary tissues17,110, 111, 112. Moreover, combination therapy involving Nikkomycin Z has yielded promising results: coadministration with echinocandins produces a synergistic antifungal effect against Aspergillus fumigatus113,114 while pairing it with fluconazole or itraconazole enhances its efficacy against multiple Candida species115 (Table 2).
The initial phase of clinical trials for Nikkomycin Z has been completed, revealing that the drug is generally well tolerated when it is administered as a single oral dose to healthy volunteers, with no dose-related adverse effects reported up to 2000 mg116,117. However, a phase II trial for the treatment of coccidioidomycosis was prematurely halted because of recruitment challenges and insufficient funding (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00614666). Despite this setback, the unique mechanism of action and promising antifungal activity of Nikkomycin Z position it as a potential new therapeutic option. It is expected that further clinical research and refinement will lead to its eventual integration into clinical practice (Fig. 4, Table 3).
5. Inhibitors of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)
GPI-anchored proteins are essential constituents of the fungal cell wall and are anchored to the cell wall by a special molecule called glycosylphosphatidylinositol. These proteins are crucial for several fungal processes, such as adhesion, invasion, biofilm formation, and maintaining cell wall integrity118. The synthesis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins is a multistep process in which the enzymes Gwt1 and Mcd4 serve as critical rate-limiting factors. Gwt1 mediates the assembly and modification of GPI structures by transferring precursor molecules to lipid-associated regions119, whereas Mcd4 further refines these molecules to ensure their proper functionality. Inhibition of these pivotal enzymes disrupts the production of GPI-anchored proteins, resulting in a disorganized cell wall architecture that compromises fungal virulence and survival119, 120, 121, 122. Given the ubiquitous presence and diverse roles of GPI-anchored proteins in fungal cells118, targeting this biosynthetic pathway represents a promising strategy for the development of novel antifungal therapies.
5.1. Fosmanogepix (APX001)
Fosmanogepix (APX001) is a multifaceted antifungal compound provided in both oral and intravenous formulations. As a prodrug, it is rapidly metabolized by phosphatases into its active moiety, manogepix (Fig. 3). This active agent exerts its antifungal effects by interfering with the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor biosynthesis pathway, chiefly through inhibition of the Gwt1 enzyme, a critical rate-limiting factor in fungal cells123,124 (Fig. 1). Importantly, manogepix does not affect proteins encoded by the human homolog of GWT1, PIGW122,125. This significantly minimizes the potential for systemic toxicity.
In vitro evaluations have revealed the extensive antifungal efficacy of Manogepix against a wide array of fungal pathogens, such as Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., Coccidioides spp., Aspergillus spp., and other less common molds18, 19, 20,125, 126, 127. In animal models, Fosmanogepix has been shown to significantly increase survival rates while decreasing the fungal load in the brains of mice with disseminated Candida auris infections. The effectiveness of this drug has also been demonstrated in models of Candida endophthalmitis and hematogenous meningoencephalitis127. Additionally, combination therapy with manogepix and liposomal amphotericin B has resulted in a synergistic effect, as evidenced by reduced fungal burdens in the lungs of patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and improved survival in individuals infected with trichothecenes. Moreover, the fungal load was significantly decreased in both lung and brain tissues128. In addition to Fosmanogepix, several analogs that target the Gwt1 enzyme, such as G884, G365, and gepinacin, have been developed, broadening the potential for therapeutic intervention in fungal infections129 (Table 2).
The results of phase II clinical trials revealed that azole-resistant Aspergillus, echinocandin-resistant Candida, and rare fungi such as Fusarium and Scedosporium exhibited in vitro activity (MIC range 0.002–0.03 mg/L) (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04240886, NCT04148287). Currently, Fosmanogepix has entered a phase III clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05421858). Furthermore, the maturation of GPI-anchored proteins requires an additional pivotal enzyme, Mcd4, which serves as an indispensable ethanolamine phosphotransferase in GPI modification. Inhibition of Mcd4 activity also results in disruption of the fungal cell wall structure, which in turn reduces virulence and viability130. Novel inhibitors that are currently being developed to target Mcd4 include M743 and M720, which are also considered to have high potential for use in antifungal therapies130 (Fig. 4, Table 3).
5.2. Jawsamycin (FR-900848)
Jawsamycin has been recognized as the pioneering compound capable of inhibiting the fungal UDP-GlcNAc phosphatidylinositol transfer complex. This inhibition disrupts fungal cell wall stability and functionality by blocking the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) biosynthesis pathway, a process driven by the suppression of the fungal UDP-glycosyltransferase subunit Spt14/Gpi3131 (Fig. 1). Notably, Jawsamycin exhibits strong selectivity for mammalian homologous enzymes, contributing to its favorable safety profile in treating fungal infections131.
In vitro studies have revealed that Jawsamycin has broad-spectrum antifungal activity, with particular efficacy against Mucor, Fusarium, and Trichosporon spp.132. Microscopic examination revealed that Jawsamycin-treated Rhizopus oryzae spores experienced substantial swelling and leakage of their cellular contents, indicative of the potent fungicidal effect of Jawsamycin132. In vivo, oral administration of Jawsamycin resulted in a significant increase in the survival rates of mice with invasive pulmonary mucormycosis, further confirming its therapeutic potential. Safety assessments revealed that Jawsamycin did not exhibit toxicity in various human cell lines (HEK293T, HCT116, HEPG2, and K562) at concentrations up to 50 μmol/L, underscoring its high therapeutic index and safety132. These promising properties position Jawsamycin as a valuable candidate for treating Mucoromycete infections. However, the identification and development of antifungal compounds remain in the early stages of investigation.
5.3. Nagilactone E
Nagilactone E, a demethylated diterpene bilactone isolated from Pinus rosa-sinensis, has been shown to exhibit antifungal properties against both nonpathogenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae and pathogenic fungi, including Candida albicans and Pseudomonas ovale. Its activity is linked to the disruption of cell wall integrity, particularly through the inhibition of β-1,3-glucan synthase activity133. Notably, when combined with phenylpropanoid compounds such as anisodamine and isosafrole, Nagilactone E enhances the antifungal potency of these agents against Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans. These findings suggest that Nagilactone E holds promise as a potential candidate for the development of novel antifungal therapies134.
Additionally, a range of naturally sourced compounds have promising inhibitory effects on critical enzymes associated with fungal cell wall construction. Specifically, poacic acid obtained from the lignocellulosic hydrolysate of Gramineae, along with the phenolic macrocyclic compound bis-plagiochin E from peanut extracts135,136, the anthraquinone derivative rhubarbine isolated from rhubarb roots and rhizomes137, and trans-cinnamaldehyde138, a principal constituent of camphor bark essential oil, have been recognized as inhibitors of β-glucan synthase. The antifungal action appears to stem from interference with the production of vital cell wall elements, β-(1,3)-D-glucan and chitin-as well as from interactions with structural molecules, including mannan proteins and glucosylceramides, ultimately disrupting the integrity of the fungal cell wall.
By inhibiting the synthesis of key structural components such as β-1,3-glucan, chitin, and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins, novel antifungal agents that target the fungal cell wall exhibit high efficacy and low toxicity. Since these components are absent in mammalian cells, such agents demonstrate high selectivity, significantly reducing toxicity to the host. However, several limitations remain. Some agents, such as nikkomycin Z, have been discontinued owing to difficulties in patient recruitment and funding shortages during clinical trials, restricting their further development. In addition, resistance remains a major challenge, particularly in mutant strains that target β-1,3-glucan synthase. With respect to potential targets, future research may further explore the biosynthetic pathways of other essential fungal cell wall components, such as mannoproteins and glucosylceramides. Additionally, natural compounds, including terpenoids and phenolic compounds, represent promising sources for novel antifungal agents and may provide new insights into their unique mechanisms of action and broad-spectrum activity.
5.4. Antifungals targeting cell membranes
5.4.1. Inhibitors of CYP51
Fungal cell membranes consist predominantly of phospholipids, sphingolipids, and sterols that form a robust matrix supporting a variety of functional proteins. In fungal organisms, ergosterol serves as the principal sterol, contrasting sharply with cholesterol, which is the main sterol in human cell membranes139. The conversion of lanosterol to ergosterol is catalyzed by lanosterol-14α-demethylase (CYP51), an enzyme encoded by the ERG11 gene. Conventional azole antifungal agents exert their activity by inhibiting CYP51, thereby impeding ergosterol biosynthesis and causing the buildup of harmful sterol intermediates that disrupt fungal cell proliferation55. However, owing to the incorporation of imidazole or triazole moieties in their structures, these agents may also inadvertently affect the human CYP51 homolog, leading to undesirable adverse effects. In response, recent innovations have concentrated on developing antifungal compounds with increased selectivity for fungal membranes. Such next-generation therapies, refined through targeted molecular design and advanced drug delivery strategies, minimize off-target effects on human CYP51 and offer improved pharmacokinetic profiles, ultimately increasing their clinical efficacy in the treatment of invasive fungal infections.
5.4.1.1. Opelconazole (PC945)
Opelconazole (PC945) is a highly effective, broad-spectrum triazole antifungal agent (Fig. 3). It exerts its action by specifically targeting lanosterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51A1), the critical enzyme responsible for converting lanosterol into ergosterol. Unlike traditional systemic triazoles, opelconazole is formulated for inhalational delivery, thereby enabling high local concentrations in the lungs while minimizing systemic exposure. This localized administration markedly reduces toxicity risks and limits drug–drug interactions mediated by the CYP450 enzyme system140,141 (Fig. 1).
In vitro studies have confirmed that opelconazole exhibits robust antifungal activity against a diverse range of Aspergillus species142. Furthermore, the combination of opelconazole with systemic triazoles was found to enhance antifungal effects, providing sustained and effective inhibition in both an in vitro human alveolar bilayer model and a neutropenic immunocompromised mouse model143,144. Opelconazole was rapidly absorbed by both target and nontarget cells, maintaining prolonged antifungal activity against fungal hyphae and bronchial cells. In a neutropenic mouse model infected nasally with Aspergillus fumigatus, topical application of opelconazole resulted in a strong antifungal response in the lungs141 (Table 2).
The FDA has conferred designations including Orphan Drug, Fast Track, and Qualified Infectious Disease Product status on opelconazole. A phase III study (OPERA-T, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05238116) is presently assessing its therapeutic potential and safety in patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) who have not responded to conventional antifungal regimens. The combination of favorable preclinical outcomes and these ongoing clinical evaluations highlights the promise of opelconazole as a novel topical intervention for IPA, thereby expanding treatment possibilities for this challenging condition (Fig. 4, Table 3).
5.4.1.2. Isavuconazole
Isavuconazole is a broad-spectrum triazole antifungal agent characterized by its molecular structure, which includes an N-(3-acetoxypropyl)-N-methylamino-carboxymethyl side chain (Fig. 3). This structure enables the drug to bind specifically to fungal CYP51, disrupting fungal cell membrane integrity and inhibiting fungal growth145 (Fig. 1).
In vitro and in vivo investigations consistently indicate that isavuconazole has robust antifungal activity against a broad spectrum of yeast and mold species. Tested organisms include various Aspergillus, Fusarium, Candida, Trichoderma, Cryptococcus, and Nigrospora spp., in addition to other filamentous fungi25, 26, 27,146, 147, 148, 149. Notably, in an Aspergillus flavus infection model, isavuconazole demonstrated pronounced antifungal efficacy. In a murine model of disseminated aspergillosis in immunocompetent hosts, the therapeutic effect against both wild-type Aspergillus fumigatus strains and azole-resistant CYP51A variants was observed to depend on exposure duration and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)147. Furthermore, in a neutropenic mouse model of endotracheal infection, a high-dose regimen of isavuconazole (215 mg/kg administered three times daily) substantially prolonged survival in animals pretreated with cyclophosphamide and cortisone acetate while markedly reducing pulmonary fungal burdens150 (Table 2).
The FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have approved isavuconazole to treat severe fungal infections. This indication covers infections caused by Aspergillus species-including invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, and those caused by Candida species, such as invasive candidiasis146,151 (Fig. 4, Table 3).
5.4.1.3. VT-1598 and oteseconazole (VIVJOA®, VT-1161)
The latest generations of azole antifungal agents, VT-1161 and VT-1598, demonstrate enhanced specificity for the fungal lanosterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51) by substituting the conventional triazole structure with a tetrazole group152,153 (Fig. 3). This structural modification not only improves drug selectivity but also significantly reduces the inhibitory effects of drugs on human CYP450 enzymes (e.g., CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19), thus minimizing the potential for drug–drug interactions152, 153, 154 (Fig. 1).
In vitro studies have shown that VT-1598 has a broad antifungal spectrum, effectively targeting yeasts such as Candida and Cryptococcus species, molds such as Aspergillus species, and endemic fungi30,155, 156, 157, 158. In mouse models of central nervous system infections, VT-1598 has been shown to increase survival while reducing fungal loads in the kidneys and brain during coccidioidomycosis159 and cryptococcosis160, thereby improving overall prognosis161. Additionally, VT-1598 has demonstrated efficacy against both fluconazole-sensitive and fluconazole-resistant Candida strains isolated from chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis patients157,161 (Table 2). Clinical trials of VT-1598, currently in phase I (NCT04208321), have not reported any severe adverse events or instances of early trial termination (Fig. 4, Table 3).
VT-1161 has a high binding affinity for Candida albicans CYP51, with a KD value of ≤39 nmol/L55, which is more than 2000 times greater than its affinity for the human homodimer154. As a result, VT-1161 shows potent activity against Candida albicans, Candida smoothii, and Candida near-smoothii both in vitro and in vivo13,31. The drug is also effective against fluconazole- or echinocandin-resistant strains and has demonstrated efficacy in treating coccidioidomycosis in mice154,162 (Table 2). Numerous clinical trials have confirmed the efficacy and safety of VT-1161 for managing recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), leading to its FDA approval in April 2022 (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03840616, NCT03562156, and NCT03561701)163 (Fig. 4, Table 3).
6. Inhibitors of sphingolipid synthesis
Sphingolipids are among the key components of the fungal cell membrane lipid bilayer and, together with ergosterol, form “lipid raft” microdomains that regulate the localization and function of membrane proteins. The unique structural relationship between the hydrophobic sphingoid base and the hydrophilic head group (e.g., phosphocholine) endows the cell membrane with dynamic equilibrium, thereby assisting fungi in adapting to environmental changes such as osmotic pressure and temperature fluctuations164. Sphingolipid synthesis inhibitors are a class of antifungal agents that disrupt fungal cell membrane integrity or interfere with signal transduction by targeting key enzymes in the sphingolipid metabolic pathway (e.g., inositol phosphorylceramide [IPC] synthase)165,166. However, the limited elucidation of the protein structures of these sphingolipid-synthesizing enzymes has somewhat constrained structure-based drug design and high-throughput screening. Although current inhibitors (such as khafrefungin and rustmicin) exhibit potent antifungal activity, their chemical stability and drug-like properties still require further optimization.
6.1. Aureobasidin A
Derived from the filamentous fungus Aureobasidium pullulans strain R106, aureobasidin A (AbA) is a cyclic depsipeptide antibiotic. AbA exerts its antifungal action by targeting inositol phosphorylceramide synthase (IPC synthase)167, thereby interrupting the conversion of ceramide into inositol phosphorylceramide and reducing sphingolipid synthesis. This sphingolipid insufficiency compromises the structural integrity of fungal cell membranes, ultimately leading to cellular lysis and death168.
Extensive experimental evidence has demonstrated that aureobasidin A has potent inhibitory effects on a broad spectrum of pathogenic fungi, including Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Aspergillus nidulans, and Aspergillus niger169,170. Preclinical studies in murine models have validated its efficacy in treating systemic candidiasis171,172. Moreover, combining aureobasidin A with amphotericin B (AmB) has produced superior therapeutic outcomes relative to conventional treatment regimens for cryptococcal meningitis in mice169,173.
7. Inhibitors of ergosterol
7.1. Encochleated amphotericin B (MAT2203)
Amphotericin B (AmB) is a polyene antifungal agent (Fig. 3). Its action is mediated through a selective interaction with ergosterol indispensable sterol in fungal membranes-which leads to the formation of transmembrane channels. The efflux of intracellular constituents ultimately disrupts cellular homeostasis, resulting in fungal cell death (Fig. 1). However, its clinical use has been significantly limited, mainly due to its high toxicity (especially nephrotoxicity) and complex mode of administration involving slow intravenous injection174,175. MAT2203 is an innovative oral formulation of amphotericin B that employs nanocrystal encapsulation (Encochleation), which significantly improves the stability and bioavailability of the drug176, 177, 178. This modification facilitates the oral administration of MAT2203, thereby enabling the efficacious management of fungal infections. In addition, it facilitates ease of administration and mitigates the risk of associated toxicity in contrast to conventional parenteral formulations of amphotericin B.
Animal studies have demonstrated that MAT2203 has efficacy comparable to that of conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate (AMB-d) in the treatment of invasive candidiasis, aspergillosis, sporotrichosis, and cryptococcosis, but has significantly reduced toxicity179, 180, 181, 182, 183. In a murine model of disseminated candidiasis, MAT2203, when administered orally, achieved a 100% survival rate at doses ranging from 0.5 to 20 mg/kg/day. The drug was also effective in decreasing fungal colonization in infected organs in a dose-dependent manner180,182. At a low dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day, MAT2203 completely rescued mice infected with Candida cells and reduced fungal colony counts in the kidneys and lungs by approximately two logs182. A higher dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day resulted in a more pronounced effect, reducing kidney colony counts by more than three logs and eliminating yeast cells from the lungs. These findings further highlight the promising therapeutic potential of MAT2203 in treating systemic fungal infections with lower toxicity than AMB-d182 (Table 2).
MAT2203 has undergone phase III clinical evaluation and has demonstrated superior antifungal efficacy184. Its performance is comparable to that of standard intravenous amphotericin B in the treatment of invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis. Furthermore, the oral formulation of MAT2203 significantly reduces the risk of nephrotoxicity and other adverse treatment-related events185 (Fig. 4, Table 3).
7.2. AM2-19
AM2-19 is an innovative antifungal agent engineered through the chemical optimization of amphotericin B (AmB) (Fig. 3). This compound selectively binds ergosterol in fungal cell membranes while exhibiting minimal activity against cholesterol in human cell membranes186. Its high selectivity allows for the continuous removal of ergosterol from fungal membranes, which function much like a sponge and ultimately lead to fungal cell death. Consequently, AM2-19 has potent antifungal efficacy while minimizing nephrotoxic effects on human kidney cells29. This mechanism effectively overcomes the major limitation of conventional amphotericin B, namely, high nephrotoxicity, while improving its efficacy (Fig. 1).
AM2-19 has been demonstrated to exhibit broad-spectrum antifungal activity against more than 500 pathogenic fungal strains, including a multitude of variants resistant to existing antifungal medications. In vitro studies have demonstrated that AM2-19 has an excellent safety profile in human blood and kidney cell environments. In vivo experiments in mouse models were conducted to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of AM2-19 in three common recalcitrant fungal infections. The results demonstrated that AM2-19 was not only efficacious but also significantly less toxic than conventional treatments29 (Table 2).
AM2-19 was approved to enter phase I clinical trials in 2023 (ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT06666322), during which its safety and antifungal activity in humans were evaluated. It is anticipated that this innovative pharmaceutical agent will offer a novel therapeutic avenue for individuals afflicted with fungal infections that are refractory to conventional antifungal therapies while concomitantly diminishing the incidence of associated adverse effects (Fig. 4, Table 3).
8. Antifungal compounds that are still in the early stages of research
8.1. Selenium-containing azole derivatives
In a recent study, a novel type of antifungal agent was identified: a selenium-containing azole derivative, designated compound B01. This compound inhibits fungal ergosterol synthesis by occupying the hydrophobic channel of the CYP51, thereby significantly enhancing its antifungal activity. In vitro experiments demonstrated that B01 is 4- to 64-fold more potent than fluconazole and exhibits significant bactericidal activity against fluconazole-resistant fungal strains. Furthermore, B01 displays high metabolic stability, low cytotoxicity, and minimal risk of hemolysis, which provides a favorable foundation for its potential clinical utilization187.
In vivo investigations have indicated that compound B01 exhibits robust antifungal activity in therapeutic applications. In a murine model of disseminated Candida albicans infection, the intraperitoneal administration of B01 led to a significant decrease in renal fungal burden, thereby underscoring its potential as an effective antifungal agent. Concurrently, the compound exhibited minimal toxicity in acute and subacute toxicity tests187. These properties render selenium-containing azole derivatives an emerging area of interest within the field of antifungal drug development, particularly in the context of treating drug-resistant strains.
8.2. 4H-Pyrano[3,2-c]pyridine derivatives
4H-Pyrano[3,2-c]pyridine derivatives constitute a novel group of inhibitors that target sterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51), which are engineered to optimize the suppression of fungal enzymes188. Prior research successfully synthesized 34 novel derivatives within this class through the application of rational structural design and advanced synthetic methodologies. These compounds bind stably to the hydrophobic cleft of CYP51, thereby inhibiting its activity. In vitro experiments demonstrated that these compounds significantly inhibited sterol 14α-demethylase even at relatively low concentrations. Fungicidal assays revealed that most 4H-pyrano[3,2-c]pyridine derivatives demonstrate potent inhibition at a concentration of 16 μg/mL. In these experiments, significant antifungal effects were observed against clinically relevant pathogens, notably Penicillium fingerlingi and Fusarium acuminatum188.
8.3. JIB-04 and its derivatives
H3K27me3, a marker of transcriptional repression in epigenetics, suppresses gene expression at specific loci through mechanisms mediated by the Polycomb Repressive Complex (PRC). In fungi, the dynamic regulation of H3K27me3 is critical for environmental adaptation189. For example, under host immune pressure or antifungal drug treatment, demethylases modulate the expression of virulence factors and drug resistance genes by removing H3K27me3, thereby increasing fungal survival190.
JIB-04 is a novel inhibitor that specifically targets the fungal Jumonji H3K27me3 demethylase191,192. The experimental data indicate that JIB-04 markedly suppresses the enzyme’s activity in Cryptococcus neoformans cells, thereby impeding ergosterol synthesis and eliciting strong antifungal effects against Cryptococcus in both in vitro and in vivo models. Moreover, treatment with JIB-04 significantly downregulated critical virulence determinants, including mechanisms underlying biofilm formation, melanin synthesis, capsule production, and cell surface hydrophobicity. Consequently, this compound has been validated as an effective antifungal agent for managing cryptococcal meningitis, and the Jumonji histone demethylase has emerged as a promising target for novel antifungal drug development. Although JIB-04 exhibits robust antifungal potency across a broad range of pathogens, its clinical utility is hampered by poor aqueous solubility, an imprecise structure–activity relationship (SAR), and insufficient pharmacological specificity192. To address these limitations and enhance both antifungal efficacy and pharmacokinetic performance, researchers have developed structural optimization strategies. Through the design and synthesis of various derivatives, compound A4 was identified as a promising candidate that exhibits robust antifungal potency alongside a clearly defined mechanism of action. Empirical studies have revealed that A4 effectively inhibits the growth of Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida auris, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.5 and 0.125 μg/mL, respectively, thereby surpassing the efficacy of the standard antifungal agent fluconazole (FLC). In addition, A4 has potent fungicidal effects, with minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) of 8 μg/mL for C. neoformans and 64 μg/mL for C. auris. Mechanistic analyses indicate that A4 not only impedes biofilm formation and capsule synthesis in Cryptococcus but also disrupts the cellular architecture by compromising the integrity of both the cell membrane and the cell wall192.
8.4. Scyampcin44-63
A novel antimicrobial peptide, Scyampcin 44-63, was isolated from the mud crab Scylla paramamosain193. Studies have consistently demonstrated that this peptide effectively suppresses both the proliferation of planktonic cells and biofilm formation in Candida albicans. Moreover, scyampcin 44-63 exhibits excellent safety profiles, as it displays no cytotoxicity toward mammalian cells or murine erythrocytes. The peptide’s antifungal activity is hypothesized to be mediated by multiple mechanisms, including the inhibition of ergosterol biosynthesis, the induction of autophagic cell death and apoptosis, and the disruption of the fungal cell cycle. In a murine model of vaginal candidiasis, intravaginal administration of scyampcin 44-63 led to a significant reduction in the Candida albicans burden and a pronounced decrease in pseudohyphal formation within the vaginal mucosa193.
8.5. Allicin
Allicin, a naturally occurring compound that is produced through a catalytic reaction between allicin extracted from garlic and alliinase, has been shown to possess a variety of antimicrobial properties193,194. Its mechanism of action is primarily through the penetration of fungal cell membranes and organelle membranes (e.g., mitochondria), which results in organelle destruction and the induction of cell death195. Transcriptomic analyses have revealed that the target genes of allicin correlate with several biological pathways intrinsic to fungal cell membranes. These include but are not limited to mismatch repair, GPI-anchored biosynthesis, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, and the phosphatidylinositol signaling system196.
Allicin exhibited concentration-dependent anti-Cryptococcus activity both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, it has demonstrated notable antifungal efficacy against a diverse array of pathogenic fungi, including Candida, Coccidioides, Trichophyton, Cryptococcus, Aspergillus, red yeast, and Fusarium acuminatum195, 196, 197, 198, 199. In a murine model, allicin (8 mg/kg) demonstrated a comparable anti-novel cryptococcal effect to that of fluconazole (FLU, 20 mg/kg) and exhibited a synergistic therapeutic effect against novel Cryptococcus when combined with amphotericin B (AmB)196.
Novel antifungal agents that target the fungal cell membrane have demonstrated significant potential in the treatment of invasive fungal infections, showing promise for enhanced efficacy, reduced toxicity, and overcoming resistance; however, further research and clinical validation are needed. In addition to conventional targets, potential membrane-associated targets warrant attention, such as two-component signal transduction proteins (for example, the histidine kinases Sln1 and Hik1200), enzymes involved in membrane lipid remodeling (such as phospholipases201, and fungal-specific membrane transporters such as the ergosterol transporters Aus1 and Pdr11202. Furthermore, targets related to virulence factors and host–pathogen interactions deserve further exploration. Membrane-bound virulence factors, such as those of the Als family in Candida, play critical roles in fungal colonization and infection203. Strategies aimed at these targets could directly diminish fungal invasiveness and effectively prevent early colonization during infection, thereby offering new avenues for antifungal therapy.
9. Antifungal compounds that target mycelia and biofilms
The capacity of fungal hyphae to proliferate and invade is pivotal to their pathogenicity. They not only facilitate fungal dissemination and colonization of the host but also increase the invasiveness of the fungus into host tissues, thereby precipitating further tissue damage and infection. In contrast, fungal biofilms have been demonstrated to impede the penetration and distribution of antifungal drugs significantly. This is achieved through the formation of extracellular matrix barriers, the upregulation of drug efflux pump gene expression, the reduction of cell permeability, the slowing of cell growth, and the possible expression of drug resistance genes204,205. The net result of these processes is the formation of a drug-tolerant biofilm, which presents a significant challenge to the efficacy of antifungal therapy206. Some of the antifungal drugs currently under investigation have the potential to inhibit mycelial growth and development, as well as biofilm formation, by modulating the expression of relevant genes or enzyme activities, thereby exerting antifungal effects.
9.1. 3,2′-DHF
3,2′-Dihydroxyflavone (3,2′-DHF), a rare dihydroxyflavonoid, is primarily isolated from the tropical plant Marsdenia tinctorial207. Experimental evidence indicates that 3,2′-DHF exerts marked antibiofilm effects against Candida albicans at concentrations within the low microgram-per-millilitre range196. Subsequent investigations revealed that this compound significantly curtails the development of C. albicans biofilms and mycelial growth by downregulating several mycelial-specific genes, such as ECE1 (encoding a mycelial-specific protein), HWP1 (a mycelial cell wall protein), and UME6 (a filament-specific transcription factor)208.
9.2. Nepodin
When isolated from rhubarb root, the compound nepodin significantly inhibited Candida smoothii, Candida near-smoothii, Staphylococcus aureus, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Its antifungal activity is achieved by suppressing the expression of genes involved in hyphal development and biofilm formation-namely, ECE1, HGT10, HWP1, and UME6-while concurrently upregulating specific transporter genes, such as CDR4, CDR11, and TPO2, which are implicated in biofilm regulation208. Furthermore, nepodin exhibited robust antibiofilm, antifilament, and antitoxic properties against fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans strains and polymicrobial biofilms. In a nematode infection model, treatment with nepodin substantially reduced the virulence of C. albicans while maintaining low cytotoxicity toward both nematode and mammalian cell lines209.
9.3. H55
Farnesol is a sterol precursor that accumulates within cells in the event of an inhibition of sterol synthesis210. A cellular typing study revealed an antipyrene derivative, designated H55. This compound was shown to stimulate farnesol production through the suppression of the fungal enzyme C-24 sterol methyltransferase (ERG6)211. H55 was found to act as a metastable Erg6 inhibitor, thereby effectively impeding the formation of the mycelium of Candida albicans and restoring virulent Candida albicans to a nonvirulent state in a mouse model of AZF-resistant candidiasis. In addition, H55 has been shown to exhibit low toxicity to cells210.
9.4. PQA-Az-13
PQA-Az-13 is a novel antifungal agent whose chemical structure incorporates imidazole, pyrrolidine, and aryl piperazine scaffolds, as well as a trifluoromethyl moiety212. This molecular configuration confers robust activity against multidrug-resistant Candida auris212,213. Experimental investigations revealed that PQA-Az-13 potently inhibits C. auris biofilms derived from ten distinct clinical isolates, with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values ranging between 0.67 and 1.25 μg/mL. Proteomic studies further indicate that the compound suppresses the expression of several key enzymatic proteins in these biofilms, particularly those involved in amino acid biosynthesis, metabolic processes, and energy production212. Owing to its pronounced hydrophobicity and limited solubility in aqueous media, PQA-Az-13 was encapsulated in cationic liposomes formulated from soybean phosphatidylcholine (SPC), 1,2-dioleoyloxy-3-trimethylammonium-propane chloride (DOTAP), and DSPE-PEG 2000. This liposomal delivery system not only facilitates targeted administration but also enhances the compound’s stability and mitigates its toxicity, as evidenced by its minimal adverse effects on normal human dermal fibroblasts. Moreover, PQA-Az-13 liposomes demonstrated superior antifungal efficacy in both in vitro biofilm assays and ex vivo skin colonization models212.
Novel drugs or compounds targeting fungal hyphae and biofilms can exert multimodal antifungal effects by inhibiting the expression of hypha-specific genes (such as ECE1, HWP1 and UME6), modulating sterol metabolism (for example, through Erg6), or disrupting biofilm metabolic pathways (for example, via amino acid synthases). These agents demonstrate low toxicity and high target specificity, for example, through the use of liposomal delivery systems for precise targeting, and hold promise for overcoming resistance. However, these methods still face limitations, including insufficient clinical translation data, uneven drug penetration due to the heterogeneous microenvironment of biofilms, and poor water solubility of some candidate compounds. Future improvement strategies should focus on developing broad-spectrum antibiofilm delivery systems (such as nanoparticles)214, further elucidating the dynamic regulatory networks between hyphae and biofilms (for example, the interplay between farnesol signaling and morphological transitions)215, and employing combination therapy strategies (such as coadministration with conventional azoles). In addition, potential new targets include core transcription factors involved in hyphal development (such as the downstream regulatory network of UME6)216 and key molecules in the fungal quorum sensing system (for example, farnesol analogs)217. Research on these targets may offer novel avenues for antifungal therapy.
10. Antifungals targeting fungal intracellular metabolism
Intracellular metabolic pathways are essential for fungal proliferation and reproduction. The central metabolic network in fungi encompasses the glycolytic pathway, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and the fatty acid synthesis pathway218. The glycolytic route facilitates the conversion of glucose into energy, while the TCA cycle not only supplies additional energy but also furnishes critical intermediates under aerobic conditions. Concurrently, the fatty acid synthesis pathway is indispensable for constructing cellular membranes and storing energy218,219. Fungal metabolic pathways exhibit inherent complexity and redundancy, underscoring the adaptability of these organisms and revealing novel targets for antifungal drug development. Accordingly, therapeutic interventions designed to disrupt these pivotal metabolic routes can effectively suppress fungal proliferation and mitigate infection.
10.1. Olorofim
Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) plays an essential role in de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis. In this pathway, the enzyme catalyzes the oxidation of dihydroorotate to orotate, which constitutes the fourth step of pyrimidine synthesis220,221. Olorofim, a novel orotamine analog (Fig. 3), inhibits pyrimidine synthesis by targeting the dihydroorotic acid dehydrogenase of fungi, thereby disrupting fungal nucleic acid production and inhibiting mycelial elongation 220,222 (Fig. 1).
Olorofim has been shown to exhibit targeted inhibitory effects against a broad spectrum of pathogenic fungi, including Aspergillus, Fusarium, and saprophytic species such as Scedosporium spp.13,223,224. In vitro experiments have confirmed that Olorofim effectively kills Aspergillus fumigatus in a time-dependent fashion, causing mycelial lysis after approximately 34 h of exposure, followed by cell death at approximately 120 h. In several preclinical models, Olorofim has demonstrated considerable potential against both invasive and endemic fungal infections. In a neutropenic mouse model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), the administration of Olorofim markedly improved survival outcomes220,225. A similar benefit was observed in a pulmonary aspergillosis model induced by Aspergillus flavus226. Furthermore, in murine models of central nervous system (CNS) coccidioidomycosis, treatment with Olorofim increased survival rates and progressively reduced the fungal burden in the brain227. In an immunosuppressed CD-1 mouse model-which was neutropenic via cyclophosphamide-intraperitoneal delivery of Olorofim not only extended survival but also significantly lowered β-D-glucan levels and the fungal DNA load228. Additionally, the compound has shown efficacy against endemic mycoses, including coccidioidomycosis and select foot and ankle infections220,229. Clinical data further indicate that Olorofim exhibits excellent tissue penetration, particularly in the lungs, liver, kidneys, and CNS (Table 2).
Olorofim is currently undergoing phase III clinical evaluation and has been granted regulatory designations by both the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for its potential to treat a broad range of invasive fungal infections (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03583164)224 (Fig. 4, Table 3).
10.2. T-2307
T-2307 is an arylamine analog with structural similarity to other aromatic diamidines, such as pentamidine230 (Fig. 3). Within fungal cells, the T-2307 compound selectively inhibits the respiratory chain complex within yeast mitochondria, resulting in a decrease in the mitochondrial membrane potential231, 232, 233 (Fig. 1).
T-2307 is notably effective against clinically significant organisms, including Candida albicans, various Pseudohyphomyces species, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillus fumigatus11,33,234. In particular, it has shown significant antifungal effects on fluconazole-resistant and fluconazole-sensitive, dose-dependent Candida albicans strains235,236, as well as azole-sensitive strains. In a variety of murine infection models (e.g., Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., and Aspergillus fumigatus infection models), T-2307 was shown to have a significant effect on mouse survival, demonstrating a dose-dependent effect and resulting in a substantial reduction in renal fungal load233,237,238. Importantly, T-2307 had a minimal effect on rat liver mitochondrial function, indicating its selective inhibitory effects on yeast mitochondria (Table 2). T-2307 is still in the early stages of clinical trials.
10.3. VL-2397
VL-2397 is a cyclic hexapeptide compound that has been purified from the fermentation broth of Acremonium persicinum. It contains an iron carrier moiety with aluminum substituted for iron in its structure, which is unique among similar compounds (Fig. 3). VL-2397 is able to actively enter fungal cells through a fungus-specific membrane-bound transporter protein, iron-transferrin 1 (Sit 1), thereby triggering rapid and potent antifungal effects. However, since this transporter protein is not present in mammalian cells, VL-2397 does not enter human cells via this mechanism, resulting in high host selectivity236,239, 240, 241, 242, 243.
In experimental settings, the in vitro efficacy of VL-2397 has been demonstrated to be significant against a diverse spectrum of fungal strains, which include azole-resistant variants of Aspergillus and other filamentous fungi that have evolved resistance to pharmaceutical agents, such as Fusarium oxysporum34. In a murine model of invasive aspergillosis (IA) induced by drug-resistant Aspergillus species, treatment with VL-2397 significantly improved survival rates while concurrently reducing the fungal burden in pulmonary tissues34,239. In addition, compared with many conventional antifungal medications, VL-2397 has been demonstrated to reduce off-target toxicity in the cytochrome P450-associated drug metabolism pathway. This finding suggests a diminished risk of concomitant drug interactions244 (Table 2).
Although the compound has progressed to phase II clinical trials with the objective of evaluating its therapeutic potential, the decision was made in February 2019 to discontinue its development for reasons that have not been disclosed244 (Fig. 4, Table 3).
10.4. Alkaloids of Waltheria spp.
Waltheria indica is extensively employed in African traditional medicine for treating ailments such as diarrhea, cough, malaria, and skin infections, which are frequently associated with fungal pathogens such as Candida species245. Consequently, it is hypothesized that the leaves of this plant are rich sources of bioactive compounds with potential antifungal properties. Previous investigations have shown that alkaloids isolated from W. indica have significant inhibitory effects on a broad spectrum of fungi246,247. Experimental findings revealed that these alkaloids generate inhibition zones measuring 25 ± 0.10 mm against Candida krusei and 23 ± 0.25 mm against Candida tropicalis, with corresponding minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.50 and 0.75 mg/mL and minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) of 0.75 and 1.25 mg/mL, respectively. These data underscore the efficacy of alkaloids in suppressing fungal growth, with particularly robust activity against C. krusei. Moreover, it is postulated that their antifungal mechanism involves disruption of fungal cell membranes and interference with cellular energy metabolism245.
10.5. Compounds YU253467 and YU254403
Phosphatidylserine decarboxylase (PSD) is essential for cellular metabolism and significantly contributes to fungal pathogenicity, making it a promising target for antifungal drug development. In a recent high-throughput screening study, two promising compounds, YU253467 and YU254403, were identified. These agents exhibited potent antifungal activity against Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus, along with moderate efficacy against Candida smoothii. However, this inhibitory effect was significantly diminished in the presence of ethanolamine, indicating that the antifungal mechanism may be associated with the inhibition of the mitochondrial activity of phosphatidylserine decarboxylase248.
Novel antifungal agents that target fungal cell metabolism exhibit broad-spectrum activity by disrupting key metabolic pathways while also demonstrating high host selectivity and the potential for overcoming resistance. These agents act by inhibiting pyrimidine synthesis, impairing mitochondrial function, and modulating iron metabolism, among other mechanisms. However, given the complexity and redundancy of fungal metabolic networks, the inhibition of a single target may be compensated for; consequently, some compounds have been discontinued during development owing to unclear mechanisms (for example, VL-2397), and the long-term safety of mitochondrial-targeting agents (such as T-2307) remains to be fully validated. In addition to the pathways mentioned above, potential targets include enzymes involved in lipid metabolism (such as phosphatidylserine decarboxylase)249, key enzymes involved in amino acid biosynthesis (such as phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH))250, and core components of the redox system (such as thioredoxin reductase)251. Fungal F1Fo ATP synthase plays a central role in fungal energy metabolism and pathogenicity252, and ATP16 deletion mutants in fungal cells exhibit downregulated virulence factors and reduced pathogenicity. The identification of a compound potentially targeting the δ subunit of the fungal F1Fo-ATP synthase induced an in vitro phenotype similar to that observed in the ATP16 deletion mutant and protected mice from death from invasive candidiasis253. Thus, F1Fo-ATP synthase is also a potential target for antifungal therapy. Moreover, fungal-specific two-component signaling systems-exemplified by the Hog1–MAPK pathway-which regulates osmotic pressure and drug tolerance, may be exploited to increase drug sensitivity through the inhibition of their histidine kinases or response regulators254. Strategies targeting enzymes involved in fungal toxin synthesis (such as polyketide synthases)255, cell cycle-dependent kinases (CDKs)256, or spindle assembly checkpoint proteins256 also offer promising avenues for inhibiting fungal proliferation.
11. Dual-targeted antifungal agents
The study of dual-targeted antifungal drugs is currently emerging as an important innovative strategy designed to increase therapeutic efficacy and reduce the risk of drug resistance by acting simultaneously on multiple key fungal targets257. These targets encompass a range of essential fungal processes, including cell membrane structure and function, DNA synthesis and repair, core metabolic pathways, mitochondrial function, and fungal response mechanisms to external stresses258. By interfering with these key processes, dual-targeted drugs are able to achieve a synergistic effect, resulting in greater antifungal activity at lower doses. Furthermore, these drugs typically demonstrate broad-spectrum antifungal activity and are capable of inhibiting multiple drug-resistant fungal strains while exhibiting high selectivity and good biocompatibility with reduced toxicity to host cells. The multi-target intervention mode of dual-targeted drugs offers a novel approach to address the issue of antifungal drug resistance, with the potential to advance the field of antifungal therapy in the future.
11.1. (Gly0.8Nap0.2)20
The compound (Gly0.8Nap0.2)20 is designed on the basis of natural host defense peptides (HDPs), which utilize poly(2-oxazoline)s as the fundamental backbone while incorporating naphthyl (Nap) groups as hydrophobic units to mimic the hydrophobic domains of HDPs. Through this biomimetic amphiphilic structure, combined with the controlled polymerization of poly(2-oxazoline)s and the hydrophobic/DNA-targeting functionality of the naphthyl groups, (Gly0.8Nap0.2)20 has emerged as a novel polypeptide-based antifungal compound257.
In vitro, assays have confirmed that (Gly0.8Nap0.2)20 exhibits robust antifungal activity against several drug-resistant fungal pathogens of clinical importance, including Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of the compounds ranged from 0.78 to 3.13 μg/mL, a potency comparable to that of amphotericin B, which has MIC values between 0.78 and 1.56 μg/mL. Moreover, (Gly0.8Nap0.2)20 demonstrated superior selectivity toward red blood cells and fibroblasts (HC50/MIC = 1–2, IC50/MIC = 1–2) compared with amphotericin B, indicating both excellent antifungal activity and enhanced biosafety. In antifungal resistance risk assessment experiments, researchers reported that after 30 consecutive passages of C. albicans and its fluconazole-resistant strains were treated with (Gly0.8Nap0.2)20 and fluconazole, the MIC of (Gly0.8Nap0.2)20 remained stable, whereas fluconazole resistance increased by more than 6400-fold. In animal models, (Gly0.8Nap0.2)20 exhibited therapeutic efficacy comparable to that of clinically approved antifungal drugs in mouse models of keratitis and skin abrasion infections. It significantly reduced the fungal burden at the infection site, mitigated hyphal invasion, and caused no apparent toxicity. In a systemic C. albicans infection model, the compound effectively improved survival rates in infected mice, comparable to amphotericin B, and successfully eradicated fungal loads from multiple organs, including the heart and kidneys, preventing further fungal invasion of critical organs. Histological analysis and blood biochemical indicators further confirmed the excellent in vivo biocompatibility and safety of (Gly0.8Nap0.2)20, supporting its potential application in treating systemic infections caused by drug-resistant fungi257. In summary, (Gly0.8Nap0.2)20 offers a promising strategy for addressing antifungal resistance through its innovative dual-targeting mechanism, potent antifungal activity, and favorable biosafety profile257.
11.2. CYP51/HSP90-related dual-target inhibitors
Current reports on dual-target antifungal agents encompass several categories. Notable classes include inhibitors that simultaneously target ergosterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51) and histone deacetylase (HDAC)259; compounds that inhibit both heat shock protein 90 (HSP90)260 and HDAC; and molecules that act on squalene epoxidase (SE) and CYP51261.
On the basis of the fusion of key pharmacophores from CYP51 inhibitors (triazole derivatives) and HDAC inhibitors (featuring zinc-binding hydroxamic acid moieties), dual CYP51/HDAC inhibitors have been developed as multitarget antifungal agents. These compounds primarily exert broad-spectrum antifungal activity by synergistically inhibiting fungal sterol biosynthesis and modulating epigenetic regulation. Recent experimental investigations have confirmed that the novel agent A5 exhibits robust in vitro antifungal efficacy against fluconazole-resistant strains of Candida tropicalis and Cryptococcus neoformans, achieving MIC80 values of 0.5 μg/mL for both organisms. These potency levels are markedly superior to those of fluconazole and the HDAC inhibitor SAHA, which both have MIC80 values exceeding 64 μg/mL in resistant isolates. Mechanistic investigations revealed that A5 acts via a dual mechanism-first, by inhibiting CYP51 activity, thereby disrupting ergosterol biosynthesis and leading to a 2.4- to 4.5-fold downregulation of ERG1 and ERG11 gene expression; second, by inhibiting HDAC activity, which results in a 3.8-fold increase in histone H3 acetylation and subsequent downregulation of virulence-associated genes. Notably, A5 completely abrogates the filamentation of Candida tropicalis at 1 μg/mL and achieves 100% inhibition of biofilm formation at 64 μg/mL, while reducing the capsule thickness of Cryptococcus neoformans by 58% (P < 0.0001), an effect closely correlated with a 3.2- to 5.7-fold downregulation of CAP10/CAP60 gene expression. In vivo, A5 prolonged the median survival of Cryptococcus neoformans-infected mice from 6 to 11 days (83% increase) and exhibited low cytotoxicity (HUVEC IC50 = 5.9 μg/mL, approximately 12-fold greater than its active antifungal concentration)259.
Dual inhibitors targeting HSP90 and HDAC have been developed by integrating the pharmacophoric elements of ganetespib, a potent HSP90 inhibitor, with those of HDAC inhibitors such as SAHA. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that these agents possess substantial antifungal activity against azole-resistant Candida albicans. Notably, among the synthesized derivatives, compound J5 exhibited robust synergistic effects, as reflected by a FICI value of 0.266 in vitro, confirming its efficacy in vivo. J5 selectively targets fungal HSP90 and HDAC enzymes, contributing to reduced toxicity. Mechanistic investigations revealed that J5 enhances the antifungal potency of fluconazole by suppressing key virulence traits-including biofilm formation and hyphal development, by downregulating resistance-associated genes such as ERG11 and CDR1. Furthermore, in vivo experiments demonstrated that treatment with J5 significantly decreased renal fungal burdens in infected mice (P < 0.001), underscoring its potential as a clinical candidate for managing azole-resistant candidiasis260.
Dual inhibitors targeting CYP51 and squalene epoxidase (SE) are a series of compounds developed via pharmacophore models derived from established SE and CYP51 inhibitors. Preliminary mechanistic studies revealed that compound 8 simultaneously impedes the functions of SE and CYP51 in Candida albicans, thereby disrupting ergosterol biosynthesis and ultimately inducing fungal cell death. The experimental data indicate that compound 8 achieves a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 3 mg/L, underscoring its considerable antifungal efficacy. Moreover, molecular docking analyses have validated the binding interactions of compound 8 with the active sites of both SE and CYP51, providing a solid theoretical basis for its further optimization and the advancement of novel antifungal agents261.
Furthermore, a recent study reported a novel dual inhibitor, ketaminazole, which simultaneously targets fungal CYP51 and human 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX), demonstrating significant antifungal potential. Experimental data indicate that ketaminazole has an IC50 of 43 nmol/L against CYP51 and shows a 17-fold greater inhibitory selectivity for yeast CYP51 than its human counterpart selectivity that surpasses that of the current antifungal agent ketoconazole. In addition, whole blood assays revealed that ketaminazole effectively reduces leukotriene B4 (LTB4) synthesis, achieving an inhibition rate of 45% at a concentration of 10 μmol/L. These findings suggest that ketaminazole not only possesses potent antifungal activity but also has anti-inflammatory effects262.
On the basis of a CYP51/HSP90-related dual-target mechanism, these antifungal compounds exhibit significant advantages by synergistically interfering with key fungal survival pathways, such as ergosterol biosynthesis and epigenetic regulation. However, these compounds still face challenges, including structural complexity (which requires a balance between the triazole ring and the zinc-binding group), potential toxicity risks (as HDAC inhibition might interfere with host epigenetic regulation), and pharmacokinetic issues. To increase both safety and efficacy, computational modeling is recommended to optimize the spatial configuration of the pharmacophores for improved target selectivity, to develop subtype-specific HDAC inhibitors to reduce off-target effects, and to systematically assess their metabolic stability (e.g., via hepatic enzyme pathways) and long-term toxicity (with particular attention to epigenetic-related side effects).
12. Antifungal agents that act on host immunity
In addition to conventional antifungal agents, adjuvant immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for the management of drug-resistant fungal infections. Compared with standard antifungal drugs, immunotherapy offers a superior safety profile and a reduced likelihood of resistance development, thereby exhibiting considerable clinical potential. Preclinical studies and clinical trials have demonstrated that combining conventional antifungal therapy with adjuvant immunotherapy significantly enhances therapeutic efficacy and improves patient outcomes263. Current approaches in adjuvant immunotherapy include the use of antimicrobial peptides with intrinsic antifungal properties, the co-administration of immune-activating cytokines alongside antifungal agents, and both prophylactic and therapeutic applications of antifungal antibodies and vaccines.
12.1. Antifungal peptides
Antifungal peptides constitute a diverse class of bioactive molecules widely distributed across plants, animals, and microorganisms, where they function as pivotal components of the innate immune defense against pathogenic invasions264,265. These agents are primarily short-chain, cationic peptides characterized by structural heterogeneity and multiple mechanisms of action266. Naturally occurring antifungal peptides include β-defensins, histones, LL-37, and filamentous proteins, among others267,268. They exert antifungal activity predominantly by compromising the integrity of fungal cell membranes and triggering the efflux of intracellular contents269. Owing to their broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties, favorable safety profiles, and reduced propensity to induce resistance, antifungal peptides have emerged as promising candidates for drug discovery and development. Notably, several peptide-based antifungal agents are currently progressing through clinical trials, underscoring their significant therapeutic potential (Table 4268,270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276,278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313).
Table 4.
The mechanism of action of immunomodulatory antifungal drugs and the latest clinical trial results.
| Therapy type | Agent name | Target indication | Target pathogen | Development stage | ClinicalTrials.gov ID | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antifungal peptides | HXP124 | Onychomycosis | Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., dermatophytes and non-dermatophyte molds | Phase I/IIa | ACTRN12618000131257 | 268 |
| NP213 (Novexatin) | Onychomycosis | Trichophyton rubrum, Dermatophytes | Phase I/IIa, IIa | 2008-001496-29, NCT02343627, NCT02933879 |
270 | |
| hLF1-11 | Prophylaxis in HSCT patients | Candida spp. | Phase Ⅱ |
NCT00509938, NCT00430469, NCT00509834 |
271 | |
| P113 | Oral candidiasis | Candida spp. | Phase I/IIa, IIb | NCT00659971 | 268,272, 274 | |
| CZEN-002 | VVC | Candida spp. | Phase Ⅰ/Ⅱa | – | 268 | |
| Pexiganan (MSI-78) | Diabetic foot ulcer infection | Gram-positive, gram-negative, anaerobic bacteria, fungi and parasites | Phase III |
NCT00563394, NCT00563433 |
275 | |
| Omiganan (MX-226 or MBI-226) | Dermal infection | Candida spp. | Phase Ⅱ, III |
NCT02849262, NCT02596074, NCT00027248, NCT00231153, 2015-002724-16, 2015-005553-13 |
276 | |
| Iseganan (IB-367) | Oral mucositis, ventilator-associated pneumonia | Candida spp. | Phase III | NCT00118781 | – | |
| LTX-109 | No special | Staphylococcus aureus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Phase I/IIa |
NCT01158235, NCT01803035, NCT01223222 |
278 | |
| Cytokine therapy | IFNγ | Trichomoniasis, candidiasis, CGD, AIDS patients, leukemia, transplant patients, cryptococcal meningitis, | Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., Cryptococcus, Staphylococcus aureus | FDA approved |
NCT05235711, NCT00059878, NCT01270490, NCT01147042, NCT04979052, NCT00012467, NCT05653193, NCT00814827 |
289, 288, 287, 286, 285, 284, 283, 282, 281, 280, 279 |
| G-CSF | Invasive candidiasis, cancer chemotherapy patients, prophylaxis in HSCT patients, trichotillomania | – | Clinical | NCT02933333 | 290, 291, 292 | |
| GM-CSF | Prophylaxis in HSCT patients, AIDS patients, acute myeloid leukemia patients, trichotillomania, candidiasis | – | FDA approved |
NCT06472739, NCT02933333, NCT01232504 |
293, 294, 295, 296, 297 | |
| M-CSF | Prophylaxis in HSCT patients | Candida spp. | Phase Ⅰ | – | 298 | |
| Immune checkpoint inhibitors | Nivolumab | Mucormycosis | Mucorales | Case study (1 patient) | – | – |
| Vaccines | NDV-3A | VVC | Candida spp. | Phase Ib/IIa |
NCT01926028, NCT02996448, NCT03455309 |
299 |
| PEV7 | VVC | Candida spp. | Phase Ⅰ | NCT01067131 | 300 | |
| D.651 | VVC | Candida spp. | Phase Ⅱ | – | 301 | |
| Killed Coccidioides immitis spherule Vaccine | Coccidioidomycosis | Coccidioidomycetes | Phase III | – | 302 | |
| Monoclonal antibodies | 18B7 | Cryptococcosis | Cryptococcus neoformans | Phase Ⅰ | – | 303 |
| Efungumab (Mycograb) | Candidiasis | C. Albicans | Clinical |
NCT00324025, NCT00847678 |
304 | |
| Cellular therapy | CAR-T | Invasive aspergillosis | Aspergillus fumigatus, Cryptococcus neoformans | In vivo (murine) | – | 307, 306, 305 |
| Granulocyte transfusion | Neutropenia, prophylaxis in HSCT patients | – | Clinical | – | 308,309 | |
| Adaptive T-cell transfusion | Diffuse invasive aspergillosis, invasive aspergillosis, prophylaxis in HSCT patients | – | Clinical | – | 310, 311, 312 | |
| Other immunotherapies | Ruxolitinib | Patients with GOF mutations in STAT1 or STAT3, CMC | – | Clinical | – | 313 |
The results of the latest clinical trials from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (March 2025).
12.1.1. NP213
NP213 is a water-soluble cyclic antimicrobial peptide developed from a host defense peptide (HDP) template and optimized for the topical treatment of onychomycosis314. NP213, which is composed of a cyclized homopolymer of seven l-arginine residues and possesses a net positive charge of +7, is structurally tailored to penetrate skin and nail tissues efficiently315. Preclinical and clinical assessments have consistently demonstrated excellent safety and tolerability, with data showing no evidence of a placebo effect. In vitro evaluations revealed that NP213 rapidly exerts bactericidal effects in aqueous formulations and effectively eradicates multiple strains of Trichophyton rubrum, even in the presence of human nails and keratin, thereby outperforming existing antifungal agents314. Furthermore, two-phase IIa clinical trials have substantiated its therapeutic potential; one study reported that 43.3% of patients exhibited no detectable fungi in nail fragments after 180 days of treatment, whereas another trial reported that 56.5% of patients had negative dermatophyte cultures following 360 days of therapy314 (Table 4).
12.1.2. hLF1-11
The human lactoferrin-derived peptide hLF1-11, comprising the initial 11 amino acids from the protein’s N-terminal region, represents a novel antimicrobial agent. This peptide exhibits a broad spectrum of activity, including antibacterial, antifungal, and immunomodulatory properties268. Its therapeutic potential has been principally evaluated in the context of infectious diseases, particularly those caused by drug-resistant bacteria and fungi. Both preclinical and clinical studies indicate that hLF1-11 is well tolerated and has a favorable safety profile316,317. In vitro experiments revealed that hLF1-11 effectively inhibits Candida albicans by preventing biofilm formation and suppressing its metabolic activity. Moreover, when used in combination with established antifungal drugs such as fluconazole and caspofungin, hLF1-11 exhibits synergistic effects that increase their antimicrobial efficacy318,319. A preliminary clinical trial involving 48 healthy volunteers (36 receiving hLF1-11 and 12 receiving placebo) as well as 8 autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients confirmed that the peptide is well tolerated, with no significant adverse effects observed271 (Table 4).
12.1.3. HXP124
HXP124, a peptide isolated from plant sources, has potent antifungal efficacy against a wide range of fungal pathogens. Its activity extends to clinically relevant organisms, including species of Candida and Cryptococcus, as well as dermatophytes and non-dermatophyte molds268. In the context of onychomycosis treatment, HXP124 has notable potential because it effectively penetrates the nail plate and inhibits the causative fungi268. Clinical evaluations have confirmed its favorable safety and tolerability profile alongside significant therapeutic efficacy in nail fungal infections. For example, in a phase I/IIa trial involving 41 patients with mild to moderate toenail onychomycosis, daily topical application of HXP124 for 6 weeks resulted in a reduction in the infected area by more than 40% in 37% of participants, compared with 18% in the control group (https://hexima.com.au/) (Table 4).
12.1.4. P113
P113 is a synthetic antimicrobial peptide derived from human histone H1 that exhibits broad-spectrum antibacterial and antifungal activities. In addition to containing 12 amino acid residues (sequence: AKRHHGYKRKFH), it was developed primarily for the management of localized oral Candida infections, such as oral candidiasis320. The antimicrobial activity of the peptide is attributed primarily to its ability to disrupt microbial cell membranes. Its positively charged amino acid residues interact with membrane phospholipids, inducing the formation of transmembrane pores that facilitate the efflux of intracellular contents and ultimately result in cell death320. Clinical studies have confirmed that P113, when applied as an oral mouthwash, is both safe and well tolerated, effectively preventing and treating oral infections of fungal and bacterial origin. In a phase I/IIa clinical trial, 37% of patients achieved a clinical cure after 14 days of treatment with P113268. Furthermore, several double-blind, randomized controlled studies have corroborated its favorable safety profile, and treatment with Nal-P113 has been shown to significantly enhance periodontal outcomes while reducing plaque accumulation and biofilm formation compared with those of controls272, 273, 274 (Table 4).
12.1.5. CZEN-002
CZEN-002, also known as CKPV2, is a novel antifungal peptide engineered by Abiogen Pharma SpA and is derived from alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis321. This agent displays extensive antimicrobial efficacy, targeting a spectrum of pathogens, including Candida albicans, Candida krusei, and Candida glabrata, as well as both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria322. Additionally, CZEN-002 modulates the host immune response by reducing macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of Candida albicans and suppressing the production of proinflammatory cytokines-namely, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6-while increasing the secretion of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10321. In phase I/IIa clinical trial involving 18 female patients, treatment with CZEN-002 achieved cure rates of 88.2% and 87.5%, as determined by KOH examination and culture, respectively268 (Table 4).
12.1.6. Pexiganan (MSI-78)
Developed as a synthetic analog of magainin 2, pexiganan (MSI-78) is derived from an antimicrobial peptide originally isolated from the skin of the African clawed toad323. Compared with 22 amino acids, this peptide exerts broad-spectrum antimicrobial effects by compromising the integrity of microbial cell membranes. Its mechanism of action is effective against a wide range of pathogens, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, anaerobes, fungi, and parasites324. Clinical investigations have highlighted its potential, particularly in managing infections associated with diabetic foot ulcers275. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that pexiganan significantly reduces bacterial loads at infection sites, and clinical trials have confirmed its favorable safety profile with minimal adverse effects325. Moreover, two successive phase III double-blind controlled trials reported that topical pexiganan achieved clinical improvement in 85%–90% of patients, microbial eradication in 42%–47% of patients, and wound healing outcomes comparable to those observed with oral ofloxacin, all without evidence of resistance development275 (Table 4).
13. Immune cytokines
Cytokines are low-molecular-weight proteins secreted by both immune and nonimmune cells that play essential roles in regulating host defense and mediating inflammatory processes. Within antifungal immunity, pivotal cytokines-including interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-12 (IL-12), and interleukin-17 (IL-17)-serve as key regulators of both innate and adaptive immune responses326. In vitro investigations have demonstrated that treatment with these cytokines enhances the resistance of the host to fungal pathogens.
13.1. IFN-γ
Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) is a cytokine that is predominantly secreted by activated T lymphocytes and natural killer cells and plays multifaceted roles in antifungal immunity327. It enhances the phagocytic and fungicidal activities of macrophages and neutrophils, thereby facilitating the clearance of fungal pathogens328. Moreover, IFN-γ augments the antigen-presenting capacity of phagocytes, which in turn potentiates adaptive immune responses328. Clinical studies have shown that adjunctive administration of recombinant IFN-γ combined with antifungal agents markedly decreases the occurrence of invasive fungal and bacterial infections in immunocompromised patients, including those with HIV, organ or bone marrow transplant recipients, chemotherapy patients, and individuals with chronic granulomatous disease268. This integrated treatment approach has been demonstrated to reduce infections caused by pathogens such as Candida spp.280,329, Aspergillus spp.280,330,331, Cryptococcus spp.329, Staphylococcus aureus, and other bacteria329. Moreover, IFN-γ has been granted FDA approval for the management of chronic granulomatous disease in patients at high risk for invasive fungal and opportunistic infections279,332 (Table 4).
13.2. G-CSF
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a critical regulator of neutrophil production and function333. Deficiencies in G-CSF or its receptor result in a significant reduction in neutrophil counts333, 334, 335. Multiple investigations have revealed a clear association between fungal infection risk and the duration and severity of neutropenia. Consequently, adjunctive treatment combining G-CSF with conventional antifungal agents is routinely employed to improve clinical outcomes in affected patients336,337. For example, Grigull et al.290 reported that three pediatric patients with fungal infections associated with hematologic malignancies achieved effective infection control following a regimen of G-CSF and antifungal drugs. Similarly, a pediatric patient with Card9 deficiency and invasive Candida infection involving the abdominal cavity and central nervous system exhibited marked clinical improvement after receiving combination therapy with G-CSF and antifungal agents291. Moreover, B. Sahin et al.292 reported that 4 patients with Trichophyton mentagrophytes infections treated with high-dose G-CSF alongside either fluconazole or amphotericin B not only survived but also showed significant increases in neutrophil counts (Table 4).
13.3. GM-CSF
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a cytokine that modulates a wide range of myeloid cells333. It has been shown to increase neutrophil production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in response to fungal challenges, thereby promoting the clearance of fungal pathogens by the immune system338,339. Recent investigations revealed that GM-CSF secreted by epithelial immune cells facilitates the recruitment of responsive neutrophils and improves their fungicidal function340. Clinically, GM-CSF is approved for managing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and is routinely integrated into hematopoietic stem cell transplantation protocols293. For example, in a phase IV clinical trial involving patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, GM-CSF administration was associated with a reduction in morbidity and mortality attributable to invasive candidiasis294. Moreover, neutropenic patients with bacterial or fungal infections receiving combined therapy with GM-CSF and antifungal agents experienced significantly higher survival rates than those treated solely with antifungal medications295. Additionally, GM-CSF has been used as adjunctive therapy in HIV-infected individuals with fungal infections and in patients with refractory invasive fungal diseases296,297 (Table 4).
13.4. M-CSF
Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) is essential for the expansion, maturation, and functional activation of monocytes and macrophages. In addition to its role in hematopoiesis, M-CSF serves as a vital immunomodulator in controlling fungal infections, particularly those that are drug-resistant or recalcitrant298. For example, in a rat model of acute candidiasis, the combined use of M-CSF with fluconazole resulted in a synergistic improvement in survival outcomes341. Similarly, in a murine model of cryptococcosis, M-CSF monotherapy significantly reduced the fungal burden342. Moreover, among bone marrow transplant recipients with Candida infections, patients treated with recombinant human M-CSF (rhM-CSF) exhibited increased survival compared with those who did not receive rhM-CSF298 (Table 4).
14. Vaccine
Vaccines are biologically active formulations that stimulate the host immune system to generate targeted responses, thereby conferring protection against specific pathogens. Similarly, fungal vaccines have demonstrated efficacy in preventing infections by priming both humoral and cellular immune mechanisms. This vaccination strategy establishes a robust protective barrier that reduces the risk of fungal invasion upon re-exposure343.
14.1. NDV-3
NDV-3 is an investigational vaccine derived from a recombinant N-terminal segment of the Als3 protein of Candida albicans that was developed to prevent recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC)344. The Als3 protein serves as a mycelium-specific virulence factor that facilitates adhesion to and invasion of human epithelial and vascular endothelial cells by C. albicans345. Preclinical studies have shown that mice immunized with NDV-3 develop significantly elevated serum antibody levels against Als3, and in a murine model of C. albicans infection, vaccination increased survival by 60% relative to that of unvaccinated controls346. Furthermore, a phase Ib/IIa clinical trial involving 188 female patients with recurrent VVC demonstrated that NDV-3 is both safe and highly immunogenic; notably, vaccinated women under 40 years of age experienced a marked reduction in the frequency of symptomatic episodes over a 12-month follow-up period299 (Table 4).
14.2. PEV7
PEV7 is an antifungal vaccine candidate developed by Pevion Biotech AG for the prevention of Candida vaginitis300. It comprises a truncated recombinant variant of Candida albicans-secreted aspartyl protease 2 (Sap2) encapsulated within influenza virosomes. Sap2 serves as a critical virulence factor and immunogen in mucosal infections caused by C. albicans. By incorporating Sap2 into the virosome, the vaccine formulation effectively enhances immunogenicity and activates the host immune response300. Preclinical and clinical investigations have demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile for PEV7. In a rat model of Candida vaginitis, immunization with PEV7 elicited robust local production of anti-Sap2 IgG and IgA antibodies, which accelerated the clearance of the fungus from the vaginal mucosa and exhibited significant therapeutic efficacy300,347. Furthermore, a phase I clinical trial involving 48 healthy female volunteers confirmed that PEV7 is both safe and highly immunogenic300 (Table 4).
14.3. D.651
D.651 is an oral vaccine formulated using ribosomes derived from Candida albicans serotypes A and B combined with a membrane proteoglycan isolated from Klebsiella pneumoniae lacking an envelope that is intended for the prevention of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC)301. In a phase II open-label trial, D.651 demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy profiles. Among 20 patients with recurrent VVC, 13 experienced no recurrence within 6 months following vaccination301. Notably, prior to immunization, these patients averaged 3.59 VVC episodes over 6 months, a rate that decreased to an average of 0.55 episodes per 6 months post-vaccination301 (Table 4).
14.4. Killed Coccidioides immitis spherule vaccine
The killed Coccidioides immitis Spherule Vaccine is formulated from formaldehyde-inactivated spherules of Coccidioides immitis302. In preclinical animal models, vaccination with this preparation effectively prevented fatal coccidioidomycosis. However, a phase III clinical trial involving 2867 healthy volunteers revealed only a marginal, statistically insignificant reduction in coccidioidomycosis incidence in the vaccinated cohort compared with the placebo group; additionally, the vaccine elicited both local and systemic adverse reactions, leading to the suspension of its development302.
In parallel, several novel vaccine platforms-such as epitope peptide-based vaccines and virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines-have demonstrated promising preclinical efficacy. For example, the NXT-2 vaccine, a panfungal candidate developed from conserved homologous sequences of multiple fungal pathogens (e.g., Pneumocystis carinii, Aspergillus, Candida, and Cryptococcus spp.), has shown robust immunogenicity and protective efficacy in murine models of invasive aspergillosis, candidiasis, and Pneumocystis pneumonia348. Moreover, Singh et al.349 reported that immunization with antigenic formulations comprising both the Als3 and Hyr1 proteins, administered with either complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) or incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA), elicited strong antibody responses, thereby protecting neonatal mice against candidiasis. Finally, the breakthroughs achieved with mRNA vaccine technology during the COVID-19 pandemic have opened new avenues for fungal vaccine development, offering innovative strategies to increase immunogenicity and protective efficacy350, 351, 352 (Table 4).
15. Antibodies
Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have made tremendous progress in the treatment of tumors, autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases, etc. Monoclonal antibodies eliminate pathogens or target cells through direct blockade, as well as by mediating antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC)351. Given the limitations of conventional antifungal agents in addressing highly drug-resistant fungal infections, current research is increasingly focused on developing MAb-based therapies for the treatment of severe fungal diseases.
15.1. ch18B7
ch18B7 is a chimeric monoclonal antibody engineered by fusing the variable domain of the murine IgG1κ monoclonal antibody 18B7 with the constant region of human IgG1κ303. It specifically binds to glucuronoxylomannan (GXM), the primary polysaccharide constituent of the Cryptococcus neoformans capsule and a key virulence determinant303. Preclinical evaluations have demonstrated that ch18B7 has a favorable efficacy and safety profile, indicating that it is effective in both the prevention and treatment of C. neoformans infections. In murine models, ch18B7 administration accelerated the clearance of fungal antigens, reduced fungal burden, and significantly improved survival outcomes353. Moreover, when combined with antifungal agents, ch18B7 displays synergistic interactions that further augment its therapeutic benefits303. In a Phase I clinical trial, administration of 18B7 to patients with cryptococcal meningitis, following antifungal therapy, was well tolerated and resulted in decreased levels of de novo cryptococcal antigens354 (Table 4).
15.2. Efungumab (Mycograb)
Efungumab is a recombinant human monoclonal antibody engineered to selectively bind fungal heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), thereby compromising fungal viability355. It has broad-spectrum antifungal activity against multiple Candida species, including C. albicans and C. tropicalis. In vitro experiments have shown that Efungumab synergizes with antifungal agents such as fluconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin355. In a murine model of systemic candidiasis, a one-time 2 mg/kg dose of Efungumab combined with amphotericin B markedly decreased average organ colony counts and reduced the incidence of positive biopsy specimens355. Additionally, a clinical study in adult patients with invasive candidiasis revealed that combining Efungumab with a lipid-based amphotericin B formulation enhanced therapeutic efficacy relative to the lipid formulation alone, lowering mortality from 18% to 4%304.
Despite these promising findings, further clinical development of Efungumab and similar antibodies has not been pursued for various reasons. Nevertheless, numerous newly developed antifungal antibodies have demonstrated encouraging preclinical results. For example, H5K1-a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting β-1,3-glucan-significantly inhibited Candida growth in vitro and exhibited enhanced antifungal effects when combined with caspofungin and amphotericin B356,357. Additionally, Antonio Cassone and colleagues reported two monospecific human single-domain antibodies (DAbs) directed against mannoprotein MP65 and Candida albicans secretory aspartyl protease (Sap2), both of which accelerated the clearance of vaginal fungal infections in rat models358 (Table 4).
16. Other immunotherapies
Recent investigations have demonstrated that increased expression of immune checkpoint molecules, including programmed death-1 (PD-1), lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3), and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM-3), is associated with impaired antifungal immunity351. Elevated levels of these markers have been detected in the peripheral blood of patients with invasive candidiasis. Treatment with PD-1/PDL-1 or CTLA-4 antibodies significantly improves survival in a variety of fungal models, including the Histoplasma capsulatum mouse model, the Candida albicans sepsis mouse model, and the mouse model of cryptococcosis359, 360, 361. Moreover, elevated levels of these markers have been detected in the peripheral blood of patients with invasive candidiasis268. In a clinical case involving an invasive fungal infection refractory to conventional antifungal therapy, the patient’s condition markedly improved following combination treatment with the PD-1-blocking antibody nab-palivizumab, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and antifungal agents (amphotericin B and posaconazole) 362.
Clinical studies have demonstrated that patients with gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in STAT1 or STAT3 are predisposed to invasive fungal infections, and treatment of chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC) patients with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib effectively alleviates their clinical symptoms313. Furthermore, JNK1 inhibitors (such as SP600125 and JNK-IN-8) have shown significant antifungal activity in both animal models and cellular assays363. In parallel, researchers are investigating methods to potentiate antifungal signaling by alleviating inhibitory mechanisms within innate immune pathways. For example, disrupting Dok3 mediated inhibition of Card9 via a synthetic short peptide markedly enhances neutrophil antifungal function364. In addition, a short peptide modified with the N-terminal 18 amino acids of STING can block STING mediated inhibition of the downstream kinase Syk, thereby reducing the risk of disseminated fungal infection in murine models365. Moreover, adoptive transfer of immune cells-including neutrophils, antigen-specific T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells has been shown to augment further the host’s ability to clear fungal pathogens351 (Table 4).
17. Reuse of clinical drugs in the antifungal field
In addition to the de novo synthesis of new compounds and the use of natural bioactive extracts, researchers have increasingly focused on optimizing the delivery methods or formulations of existing antifungal drugs, as well as combining them with nonantifungal agents to increase therapeutic efficacy. Although anticancer, antibacterial, and antiviral drugs are not designed primarily to target fungi, some have demonstrated potential antifungal activity through cross-domain effects. Compared with novel drug development, drug repurposing offers significant advantages in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. First, it shortens the research and development timeline, reduces costs, and accelerates clinical translation, thereby addressing the growing challenge of drug resistance. Second, as the safety profiles and pharmacokinetic properties of these drugs are already well characterized, their clinical application involves fewer uncertainties, facilitating dose optimization and minimizing potential toxicity risks. Moreover, certain repurposed drugs may exhibit novel mechanisms of action or synergistic effects with antifungal agents, helping to overcome resistance and expand therapeutic options, particularly for multidrug-resistant fungal infections and immunocompromised patients. These drugs may exert their antifungal effects by enhancing host immune responses, inhibiting pathogen immune evasion, or directly disrupting fungal growth, offering potential adjunctive treatment strategies for patients with immunodeficiency or antifungal drug resistance.
17.1. Antifungal potential of antimicrobial agents
Traditional antibacterial agents primarily include beta-lactams (such as penicillins and cephalosporins), sulfonamides, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, macrolides, chloramphenicol, lincosamides, and early-generation quinolones. These drugs exert their antibacterial effects by inhibiting cell wall synthesis, disrupting cell membrane integrity, inhibiting protein synthesis, and interfering with nucleic acid metabolism. Numerous studies have reported that some antibacterial agents possess broad-spectrum antifungal activity, and their use, either as monotherapy or in combination with existing antifungal drugs, may further enhance antifungal efficacy366,367.
17.1.1. Tetracycline antibiotics
Minocycline is a semi-synthetic, second-generation tetracycline antibiotic widely used to treat various infectious and non-infectious conditions. Its antibacterial effect is primarily mediated by binding to the 16S rRNA and S7 proteins of the bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit, which alters the ribosomal conformation and prevents aminoacyl-tRNA from accessing its binding site, thereby inhibiting protein synthesis.
In addition to its antibacterial properties, minocycline has demonstrated antifungal activity against fluconazole-resistant Candida species, including C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. glabrata368. Several investigations have demonstrated that minocycline, when coadministered with conventional antifungal agents such as amphotericin B, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole-yields increased antifungal activity369, 370, 371, 372. In these organisms, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) range from 4 to 427 μg/mL, reflecting considerable variability among strains. When combined with fluconazole, minocycline significantly reduces the MIC of fluconazole, decreasing it from 512 to 2 μg/mL with a fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) as low as 0.035, indicating a strong synergistic effect370. In a Candida albicans biofilm model, treatment with minocycline alone led to a reduction in biofilm activity of more than 50%, and its combination with fluconazole further enhanced the effect, resulting in an approximately 70% reduction in fluorescence intensity370. Mechanistic studies suggest that the antifungal action of minocycline may result from enhanced fluconazole penetration into biofilms and the induction of intracellular calcium release rather than from changes in fluconazole uptake or efflux.
17.1.2. Macrolide antibiotics
Macrolide antibiotics have traditionally been regarded as protein synthesis inhibitors that exhibit broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, particularly against Gram-positive cocci and atypical pathogens. In addition, studies have demonstrated that macrolides possess immunomodulatory properties; their role in regulating excessive inflammatory responses has been extensively investigated, and they have been shown to activate innate immune responses, for instance, by inhibiting neutrophil migration373, regulating the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages, and modulating macrophage function374,375.
Recent studies have indicated that macrolide antibiotics can impede capsule formation in Cryptococcus species while simultaneously enhancing the host immune response. In particular, combined administration of clarithromycin (CAM) and azithromycin (AZM) markedly diminishes capsule thickness and lowers the capsule polysaccharide content in Cryptococcus gattii and other emerging strains376. CAM-treated C. gattii cells exhibit increased susceptibility to oxidative stress induced by H2O2 as well as to neutrophil-mediated phagocytic killing. Moreover, exposure to CAM enhances the uptake of C. gattii by murine macrophages and is associated with a significant increase in tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) production. Additionally, CAM treatment results in the dephosphorylation of Hog1, a key regulator within the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway and substantially reduces the mRNA levels of LAC1 and LAC2, genes linked to cell wall integrity and melanin synthesis. These findings suggest that CAM may exert its antifungal effects by modulating MAPK signaling and downregulating virulence gene expression, thereby bolstering host immune defenses376.
17.1.3. Fluoroquinolones
Fluoroquinolones constitute a group of synthetic antimicrobial agents with broad-spectrum activity. Their primary mode of action involves the inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II, an enzyme exclusive to prokaryotic organisms. This inhibition disrupts the DNA supercoiling process, ultimately resulting in irreversible damage to bacterial chromosomes. Owing to their highly selective toxicity against prokaryotes, combined with high oral bioavailability and extensive tissue distribution (particularly achieving elevated concentrations in prostate and lung tissues), fluoroquinolones play a significant role in conventional antibacterial therapy. Moreover, several studies have demonstrated that fluoroquinolones also exhibit antifungal activity377,378.
Recent studies have demonstrated that when administered as a 0.5% ophthalmic solution, both moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin exhibit potent antifungal activity, achieving inhibition rates exceeding 95% against Candida species379. Moreover, several fluoroquinolones have been shown to potentiate the efficacy of conventional antifungal agents against Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus380, 381, 382, whereas the combination of ciprofloxacin with azole antifungals has synergistic effects on Cryptococcus neoformans383. Clinically, despite the limited reports on quinolone-based interventions for fungal keratitis, documented cases indicate that topical moxifloxacin monotherapy can effectively resolve this condition, highlighting the importance of achieving high local drug concentrations in ocular fungal infections384. Mechanistic investigations have established that the primary target of fluoroquinolones in yeast is topoisomerase II385,386. Further research suggested that resistant forms of yeast topoisomerase II may harbor amino acid substitutions analogous to the mutations observed in the gyrA gene of Escherichia coli387, 388, 389. Additionally, the distinct structural and functional differences between yeast and mammalian type II topoisomerases likely underlie the antifungal activity of fluoroquinolones and their selective toxicity toward prokaryotic targets.
18. Antifungal potential of antineoplastic drug components
18.1. AR-12
AR-12, a derivative of the antitumor drug celecoxib, was initially developed for antitumor therapy and entered clinical studies. However, recent findings have demonstrated that it also exhibits fungicidal activity against Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida albicans390,391. AR-12 exerts its antifungal effects through two mechanisms. Firstly, it has been established that this substance functions as an ATP-competitive, time-dependent inhibitor of yeast acetyl-CoA synthetase. This key enzyme has a vital function in facilitating microbial growth. It has been established that the inhibition of the enzyme mentioned above may result in the occurrence of fungal autophagy, in addition to the consequent loss of cellular integrity. Second, AR-12 downregulates the expression of host molecular chaperone proteins, which enhances host immune responses392.
AR-12 has demonstrated substantial antifungal efficacy against a broad spectrum of fungal pathogens, including yeasts, molds, and dimorphic species, as well as Candida albicans strains that are resistant to both azoles and echinocandins391. In an AJ/Cr murine model of cryptococcal meningitis, treatment with AR-12 markedly enhanced the therapeutic effect of fluconazole391.
18.2. CBR-5884
CBR-5884 represents a phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase inhibitor that was originally developed for the purpose of blocking the synthesis of folitropic serine. Evidence has emerged demonstrating the significant antitumor activity of CBR-5884 against melanoma and breast cancer cell lines393. Although the antitumor properties of CBR-5884 have been extensively studied, recent studies have indicated its potential for use in antifungal applications. Specifically, CBR-5884 has been demonstrated to interfere with phosphatidylserine (PS) synthesis by competitively binding to the serine binding site of Cho1 in fungal cells. This mechanism significantly inhibits the growth and function of Candida albicans, thereby providing a rationale for further studies of CBR-5884 in the antifungal field51.
18.3. MitoTam
MitoTam is an anticancer drug developed via a mitochondrial-targeting strategy. Its core active component is a derivative of tamoxifen, and it utilizes the triphenylphosphonium cation (TPP+) as a mitochondria-targeting carrier394. MitoTam exerts its antitumor effects by impairing mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I, which in turn elevates the intracellular production of superoxide radicals and activates apoptotic pathways395,396. Clinical investigations have revealed that MitoTam has pronounced antitumor efficacy, especially in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma, breast neoplasms, and triple-negative breast cancer397.
Investigations have revealed that even at submicromolar concentrations, MitoTam exerts potent cytotoxic effects on key pathogenic eukaryotes. In particular, concentrations below the effective concentration 50 (EC50) inhibit the proliferation of Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans, potentially by inducing the upregulation of multiple drug efflux pump genes in Candida394. The antifungal efficacy of this compound is attributed to its unique mechanism of targeting mitochondria in conjunction with its broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against various pathogens.
19. Antifungal potential of antivirals
19.1. K21
K21 is a quaternary ammonium compound anchored to a silica dioxide carrier and features a tetraethoxysilane moiety within its structure398. It has been shown to exert notable inhibitory effects against several oral pathogens, including Porphyromonas gingivalis, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus species, Actinomyces naeslundii, and Enterococcus faecalis399, 400, 401, 402, 403. Moreover, evidence suggests that K21 possesses antiviral properties against herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), human herpesvirus 6A (HHV-6A), and human herpesvirus 7 (HHV-7), acting either by suppressing viral replication or by directly targeting the viral envelope404,405.
Additional studies have demonstrated that a concentration of 62.48 μg/mL K21 can eradicate 99.9% of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata within 2 h; even at half or one-quarter of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the compound maintains significant antifungal activity. When combined with fluconazole, K21 exhibits pronounced synergistic effects against various Candida strains, including those resistant to fluconazole in oral infections. Mechanistic investigations indicate that K21 primarily mediates its fungicidal effect by disrupting the fungal cell membrane mechanism similar to that of amphotericin B but distinct from fluconazole’s inhibition of ergosterol synthesis406. Consequently, the coadministration of K21 with fluconazole appears to synergistically compromise membrane permeability and interfere with normal cell division, thereby enhancing antifungal efficacy.
19.2. Ribavirin
Ribavirin, a synthetic purine nucleoside analog with broad-spectrum antiviral properties, disrupts viral replication by interfering with nucleotide metabolism. It is commonly employed in the treatment of viral infections, including those caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hemorrhagic fever viruses such as Lassa virus.
Recent investigations have revealed that acting as an inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), ribavirin exhibits potent antifungal efficacy against Candida albicans both as monotherapy and in combination with fluconazole (FLC)407,408. Experimental findings indicate that the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC80) for ribavirin against C. albicans falls between 2 and 4 μg/mL, whereas for fluconazole-resistant strains, the MIC80 reaches approximately 8 μg/mL levels that align with clinical safety parameters. In a Galleria mellonella infection model, the adjunctive use of ribavirin with fluconazole significantly enhanced therapeutic outcomes and reduced tissue damage attributable to fluconazole-resistant C. albicans, thereby substantiating a synergistic antifungal effect. Mechanistic research suggests that ribavirin may exert its antifungal action by inhibiting biofilm formation, diminishing phospholipase activity, and suppressing hyphal transformation, independent of alterations in drug absorption or efflux408. Furthermore, ribavirin shows synergistic activity when combined with other azole antifungals, such as itraconazole and posaconazole, although no such synergy has been observed with 5-fluorocytosine407.
20. Conclusions and future perspectives
Recent advances in medicine have led to the development of innovative antifungal agents that demonstrate robust clinical efficacy in managing invasive fungal infections. This review provides a comprehensive overview of emerging antifungal therapeutics and highlights their diverse mechanisms of action. The discussion encompasses recent progress in targeting fungal cell walls, cell membranes, mycelia, and biofilm structures. For example, inhibitors directed against cell wall biosynthetic enzymes, such as glucan synthase and chitin synthase, have been intensively investigated due to their high specificity, whereas structural modifications have markedly improved the safety profiles of compounds acting on the cell membrane. In addition, agents that impede hyphal and biofilm formation are increasingly recognized as promising therapeutic options for multidrug-resistant pathogens. Many of these compounds are currently undergoing late-stage clinical trials, representing new drug classes with innovative mechanisms and distinctive pharmacodynamic profiles. Emerging antifungal agents-including manogepix, olorofim, T-2307, and VL-2397-have exhibited robust activity in both in vitro and in vivo models against isolates resistant to azoles or echinocandins, as well as species with intrinsic resistance to conventional antifungals. Moreover, several agents share similar targets with established drugs but have been optimized to improve their pharmacokinetic properties; for example, rezafungin has been chemically modified to increase metabolic stability, whereas ibrexafungerp and MAT2203 offer viable alternatives for oral administration. Additionally, opelconazole facilitates targeted pulmonary delivery, and oteconazole has been engineered to minimize drug–drug interactions and adverse effects. Collectively, these innovations not only improve the treatment of invasive fungal infections but also expand the therapeutic options available to clinicians, enabling more tailored and individualized antifungal strategies.
Despite significant progress in antifungal research, invasive fungal infections continue to pose substantial clinical challenges due to their high morbidity, mortality, and increasing drug resistance. These issues are particularly pronounced in the realms of early diagnosis, the elucidation of resistance mechanisms, and the formulation of personalized treatment strategies. Future research should prioritize the identification of novel intracellular fungal targets and the development of multitarget agents. Numerous potential targets, both intracellular and extracellular, are currently under investigation; these include enzymes involved in nucleic acid metabolism, such as pyrimidine synthases and DNA repair proteins, as well as components of stress response and autophagy pathways. In addition, targeting fungal virulence factors, the cytoskeleton, and the complex interactions between fungal pathogens and the host immune system offers promising new avenues for therapy. Enhancing the molecular design and delivery methods of existing drugs is also expected to improve their safety profiles and patient adherence. Ongoing efforts in these areas are anticipated to yield significant breakthroughs in both the diagnosis and treatment of invasive fungal infections, thereby providing safer, more effective therapeutic options and advancing the field toward precision medicine and personalized care277.
Author contributions
Xueni Lu contributed to the data collection and organization, writing-original draft preparation, figure and table drawing. Jianlin Zhou is primarily responsible for reference proofreading and organization, charting. Lingyun Feng, Yi Ming, Yuan Wang and Ruirui He collected and provided part of the literature data. Yangyang Li, Bo Zeng and Yanyun Du contributed to the manuscript proofreading and correction. Chenhui Wang contributed to determining the general direction and objectives of the research, and revision of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This investigation was supported by grants from the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars, China (82225029 to Chenhui Wang); the Key Program of National Natural Science of China (82430076 to Chenhui Wang); and the Youth Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82301989 to Ruirui He; 82302628 to Yanyun Du, 82301987 to Bo Zeng and 82402704 to Yangyang Li).
Footnotes
Peer review under the responsibility of Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
Contributor Information
Yangyang Li, Email: yangyang_li@uestc.edu.cn.
Lingyun Feng, Email: lingyunfeng@uestc.edu.cn.
Bo Zeng, Email: zengbo92@163.com.
Yanyun Du, Email: yanyundul@163.com.
Chenhui Wang, Email: wangch@uestc.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Taramasso L., Tatarelli P., Di Biagio A. Bloodstream infections in HIV-infected patients. Virulence. 2016;7:320–328. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1158359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Angarone M. Fungal infections in cancer patients. Cancer Treat Res. 2014;161:129–155. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04220-6_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Salazar F., Salazar F., Brown G.D. Antifungal innate immunity: a perspective from the last 10 years. J Innate Immun. 2018;10:373–397. doi: 10.1159/000488539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Souza C.M., Bezerra B.T., Mellon D.A., de Oliveira H.C. The evolution of antifungal therapy: traditional agents, current challenges and future perspectives. Curr Res Microb Sci. 2025;8 doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mueller S.W., Kedzior S.K., Miller M.A., Reynolds P.M., Kiser T.H., Krsak M., et al. An overview of current and emerging antifungal pharmacotherapy for invasive fungal infections. Expet Opin Pharmacother. 2021;22:1355–1371. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1892075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Antinori S., Milazzo L., Sollima S., Galli M., Corbellino M. Critically ill patients at risk of invasive candidiasis: the “dilemma” of the best antifungal treatment strategy. Eur J Intern Med. 2017;37:e20–e21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bienvenu A.L., Argaud L., Aubrun F., Fellahi J.L., Guerin C., Javouhey E., et al. A systematic review of interventions and performance measures for antifungal stewardship programmes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:297–305. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Johnson M.D. Antifungals in clinical use and the pipeline. Infect Dis Clin. 2021;35:341–371. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2021.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ordaya E.E., Clement J., Vergidis P. The role of novel antifungals in the management of candidiasis: a clinical perspective. Mycopathologia. 2023;188:937–948. doi: 10.1007/s11046-023-00759-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Puumala E., Fallah S., Robbins N., Cowen L.E. Advancements and challenges in antifungal therapeutic development. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024;37 doi: 10.1128/cmr.00142-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Qin Y., Wang J., Lv Q., Han B. Recent progress in research on mitochondrion-targeted antifungal drugs: a review. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023;67 doi: 10.1128/aac.00003-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen Y., Lu Z.Y., Jin Y., Han L., Huang L.Y. Progress of research on azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Chin J Epidemiol. 2016;37:1687–1692. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2016.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Boakye-Yiadom E., Odoom A., Osman A.H., Ntim O.K., Kotey F.C.N., Ocansey B.K., et al. Fungal infections, treatment and antifungal resistance: the sub-saharan african context. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2024;11 doi: 10.1177/20499361241297525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hokken M.W.J., Zwaan B.J., Melchers W.J.G., Verweij P.E. Facilitators of adaptation and antifungal resistance mechanisms in clinically relevant fungi. Fungal Genet Biol. 2019;132 doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2019.103254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Robbins N., Cowen L.E. Antifungal drug resistance: deciphering the mechanisms governing multidrug resistance in the fungal pathogen Candida glabrata. Curr Biol. 2021;31 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.071. R1520-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen P., Liu J., Zeng M., Sang H. Exploring the molecular mechanism of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. J Mycol Med. 2020;30 doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2019.100915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lamb D.C., Kelly D.E., White T.C., Kelly S.L. The R467K amino acid substitution in Candida albicans sterol 14alpha-demethylase causes drug resistance through reduced affinity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:63–67. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.1.63-67.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Beyda N.D., John J., Kilic A., Alam M.J., Lasco T.M., Garey K.W. FKS mutant Candida glabrata: risk factors and outcomes in patients with candidemia. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:819–825. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shields R.K., Nguyen M.H., Press E.G., Kwa A.L., Cheng S., Du C., et al. The presence of an FKS mutation rather than MIC is an independent risk factor for failure of echinocandin therapy among patients with invasive candidiasis due to Candida glabrata. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:4862–4869. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00027-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ostrosky-Zeichner L. Candida glabrata and FKS mutations: witnessing the emergence of the true multidrug-resistant Candida. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1733–1734. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sipos G., Kuchler K. Fungal ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters in drug resistance & detoxification. Curr Drug Targets. 2006;7:471–481. doi: 10.2174/138945006776359403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boyer J., Feys S., Zsifkovits I., Hoenigl M., Egger M. Treatment of invasive aspergillosis: how it’s going, where it’s heading. Mycopathologia. 2023;188:667–681. doi: 10.1007/s11046-023-00727-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.A K.R., Shah A.H., Prasad R. MFS transporters of Candida species and their role in clinical drug resistance. FEMS Yeast Res. 2016;16 doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fow043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Corrales J., Ramos-Alonso L., González-Sabín J., Ríos-Lombardía N., Trevijano-Contador N., Engen Berg H., et al. Characterization of a selective, iron-chelating antifungal compound that disrupts fungal metabolism and synergizes with fluconazole. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12 doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02594-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhu X., Wang A., Zheng Y., Li D., Wei Y., Gan M., et al. Anti-biofilm activity of cocultimycin a against Candida albicans. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24 doi: 10.3390/ijms242317026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nett J.E., D R.A. Fungal biofilms: in vivo models for discovery of anti-biofilm drugs. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MB-0008-2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Verma R., Pradhan D., Nayek A., Singh H., Jain A.K., Khan L.A. Target-based drug repurposing against Candida albicans—a computational modeling, docking, and molecular dynamic simulations study. J Cell Biochem. 2022;123:289–305. doi: 10.1002/jcb.30163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhou Y., Phelps G.A., Mangrum M.M., McLeish J., Phillips E.K., Lou J., et al. The small molecule CBR-5884 inhibits the Candida albicans phosphatidylserine synthase. mBio. 2024;15 doi: 10.1128/mbio.00633-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tian S., Liao X., Cao W., Wu X., Chen Z., Lu J., et al. GSFM: a genome-scale functional module transformation to represent drug efficacy for in silico drug discovery. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2025;15:133–150. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu J., Gui Y., Rao J., Sun J., Wang G., Ren Q., et al. In silico off-target profiling for enhanced drug safety assessment. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2024;14:2927–2941. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shao F., Li H., Hsieh K., Zhang P., Li S., Wang T.H. Automated and miniaturized screening of antibiotic combinations via robotic-printed combinatorial droplet platform. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2024;14:1801–1813. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.11.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Campoy S., Adrio J.L. Antifungals. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017;133:86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Heard S.C., Wu G., Winter J.M. Antifungal natural products. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021;69:232–241. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Peyclit L., Yousfi H., Rolain J.M., Bittar F. Drug repurposing in medical mycology: identification of compounds as potential antifungals to overcome the emergence of multidrug-resistant fungi. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14:488. doi: 10.3390/ph14050488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kim J.H., Cheng L.W., Chan K.L., Tam C.C., Mahoney N., Friedman M., et al. Antifungal drug repurposing. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020;9:812. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9110812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Donlin M.J., Meyers M.J. Repurposing and optimization of drugs for discovery of novel antifungals. Drug Discov Today. 2022;27:2008–2014. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2022.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.van Spriel A.B. Novel immunotherapeutic strategies for invasive fungal disease. Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Hematol Disord. 2003;3:209–217. doi: 10.2174/1568006033481438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Datta K., Hamad M. Immunotherapy of fungal infections. Immunol Investig. 2015;44:738–776. doi: 10.3109/08820139.2015.1093913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nami S., Aghebati-Maleki A., Morovati H., Aghebati-Maleki L. Current antifungal drugs and immunotherapeutic approaches as promising strategies to treatment of fungal diseases. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;110:857–868. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kumar A., Bansal P., Katiyar D., Prakash S., Raghavendra Rao N.G. Molecular targeting and novel therapeutic approaches against fungal infections. Curr Mol Med. 2023;23:726–736. doi: 10.2174/1566524023666230302123310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Iyer K.R., Revie N.M., Fu C., Robbins N., Cowen L.E. Treatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: challenges, advances and future outlook. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19:454–466. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00511-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu C., Hu L., Dong G., Zhang Y., Ferreira da Silva-Júnior E., Liu X., et al. Emerging drug design strategies in anti-influenza drug discovery. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13:4715–4732. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vicente F., Reyes F., Genilloud O. Fungerps: discovery of the glucan synthase inhibitor enfumafungin and development of a new class of antifungal triterpene glycosides. Nat Prod Rep. 2024;41:1835–1845. doi: 10.1039/d4np00044g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wiederhold N.P. Pharmacodynamics, mechanisms of action and resistance, and spectrum of activity of new antifungal agents. J Fungi (Basel) 2022;8:857. doi: 10.3390/jof8080857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Crawford E.S., Mizrahi E.M., Hess K.R., Coselli J.S., Safi H.J., Patel V.M. The impact of distal aortic perfusion and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring on prevention of paraplegia after aortic aneurysm operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;95:357–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Larwood D.J. Nikkomycin Z-Ready to meet the promise?. J Fungi (Basel) 2020;6:261. doi: 10.3390/jof6040261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sass G., Kotta-Loizou I., Martinez M., Larwood D.J., Stevens D.A. Polymycovirus infection sensitizes Aspergillus fumigatus for antifungal effects of nikkomycin Z. Viruses. 2023;15:197. doi: 10.3390/v15010197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Goldberg J., Connolly P., Schnizlein-Bick C., Durkin M., Kohler S., Smedema M., et al. Comparison of nikkomycin Z with amphotericin B and itraconazole for treatment of histoplasmosis in a murine model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1624–1629. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.6.1624-1629.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.August B.A., Kale-Pradhan P.B. Management of invasive candidiasis: a focus on rezafungin, ibrexafungerp, and fosmanogepix. Pharmacotherapy. 2024;44:467–479. doi: 10.1002/phar.2926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Eschenauer G.A. Antifungal therapies for Aspergillus spp.: present and future. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2024;45:61–68. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Trzoss M., Covel J.A., Kapoor M., Moloney M.K., Soltow Q.A., Webb P.J., et al. Synthesis of analogs of the Gwt1 inhibitor manogepix (APX001A) and in vitro evaluation against Cryptococcus spp. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2019;29 doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.126713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pfaller M., Huband M., Bien P.A., Carvalhaes C.G., Klauer A., Castanheira M. In vitro activity of manogepix and comparators against infrequently encountered yeast and mold isolates from the SENTRY Surveillance Program (2017-2022) Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024;68 doi: 10.1128/aac.01132-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Treviño-Rangel R.J., González G.M., Montoya A.M., Rojas O.C., Elizondo-Zertuche M., Álvarez-Villalobos N.A. Recent antifungal pipeline developments against Candida auris: a systematic review. J Fungi (Basel) 2022;8:1144. doi: 10.3390/jof8111144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kriegl L., Egger M., Boyer J., Hoenigl M., Krause R. New treatment options for critically important WHO fungal priority pathogens. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024;31:922–930. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Li Y., Nie J., Zhang J., Xu G., Zhang H., Liu M., et al. Chiral fungicide penconazole: absolute configuration, bioactivity, toxicity, and stereoselective degradation in apples. Sci Total Environ. 2022;808 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gow-Lee V., Abu Saleh O.M., Harris C.E., Gile J.J., Akhiyat N., Chesdachai S. Outcomes of invasive fungal infections treated with isavuconazole: a retrospective review. Pathogens. 2024;13:886. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13100886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lahmer T., Batres Baires G., Schmid R.M., Wiessner J.R., Ulrich J., Reichert M., et al. Penetration of isavuconazole in ascites fluid of critically ill patients. J Fungi (Basel) 2021;7:376. doi: 10.3390/jof7050376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nocua-Báez L.C., Uribe-Jerez P., Tarazona-Guaranga L., Robles R., Cortés J.A. Azoles of then and now: a review. Rev Chilena Infectol. 2020;37:219–230. doi: 10.4067/s0716-10182020000300219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Dalton L.M., Kauffman C.A., Miceli M.H. Oral lipid nanocrystal amphotericin B (MAT2203) for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024;11 doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Maji A., Soutar C.P., Zhang J., Lewandowska A., Uno B.E., Yan S., et al. Tuning sterol extraction kinetics yields a renal-sparing polyene antifungal. Nature. 2023;623:1079–1085. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06710-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gu K., Spitz R., Hammett E., Jaunarajs A., Ghazaryan V., Garvey E.P., et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of antifungal agent VT-1598 and its primary metabolite, VT-11134, in healthy adult subjects: phase 1, first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of single-ascending oral doses of VT-1598. Med Mycol. 2024;62 doi: 10.1093/mmy/myae032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lanier C., Melton T.C. Oteseconazole for the treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a drug review. Ann Pharmacother. 2024;58:636–644. doi: 10.1177/10600280231195649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Vanbiervliet Y., Van Nieuwenhuyse T., Aerts R., Lagrou K., Spriet I., Maertens J. Review of the novel antifungal drug olorofim (F901318) BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24:1256. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10143-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wiederhold N.P. Review of T-2307, an investigational agent that causes collapse of fungal mitochondrial membrane potential. J Fungi (Basel) 2021;7:130. doi: 10.3390/jof7020130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nakamura I., Ohsumi K., Takeda S., Katsumata K., Matsumoto S., Akamatsu S., et al. ASP2397 is a novel natural compound that exhibits rapid and potent fungicidal activity against Aspergillus species through a specific transporter. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02689-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sawant B., Khan T. Recent advances in delivery of antifungal agents for therapeutic management of candidiasis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;96:1478–1490. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.11.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gómez-López A. Antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: focus on drugs without a clear recommendation. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26:1481–1487. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hamill R.J. Amphotericin B formulations: a comparative review of efficacy and toxicity. Drugs. 2013;73:919–934. doi: 10.1007/s40265-013-0069-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Quindós G., Gil-Alonso S., Marcos-Arias C., Sevillano E., Mateo E., Jauregizar N., et al. Therapeutic tools for oral candidiasis: current and new antifungal drugs. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;24:e172–180. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Daneshnia F., de Almeida Júnior J.N., Ilkit M., Lombardi L., Perry A.M., Gao M., et al. Worldwide emergence of fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis: current framework and future research roadmap. Lancet Microbe. 2023;4:e470–480. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00067-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Parkin J.L. Ketoconazole and the antifungals. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985;93:132–133. doi: 10.1177/019459988509300129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sousa Y.V., Santiago M.G., de Souza B.M., Keller K.M., Oliveira C.S.F., Mendoza L., et al. Itraconazole in human medicine and veterinary practice. J Mycol Med. 2024;34 doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2024.101473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Trailokya A.A., Shirsat A.B., Madhu R., Shah B. Naftifine: a topical allylamine for superficial dermatophytosis. J Assoc Phys India. 2023;71:11–12. doi: 10.5005/japi-11001-0241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lepak A.J., Andes D.R. Antifungal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;5 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Gow N.A.R., Latge J.P., Munro C.A. The fungal cell wall: structure, biosynthesis, and function. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5:10. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0035-2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Cortés J.C.G., Curto M., Carvalho V.S.D., Pérez P., Ribas J.C. The fungal cell wall as a target for the development of new antifungal therapies. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37 doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Hu X., Yang P., Chai C., Liu J., Sun H., Wu Y., et al. Structural and mechanistic insights into fungal β-1,3-glucan synthase FKS1. Nature. 2023;616:190–198. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05856-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wang J., Mao J., Yang G., Zheng F., Niu C., Li Y., et al. The FKS family genes cause changes in cell wall morphology resulted in regulation of anti-autolytic ability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour Technol. 2018;249:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Walker S.S., Xu Y., Triantafyllou I., Waldman M.F., Mendrick C., Brown N., et al. Discovery of a novel class of orally active antifungal beta-1,3-d-glucan synthase inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:5099–5106. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00432-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Davis M.R., Donnelley M.A., Thompson G.R. Ibrexafungerp: a novel oral glucan synthase inhibitor. Med Mycol. 2020;58:579–592. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myz083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kumar V., Huang J., Dong Y., Hao G.F. Targeting Fks1 proteins for novel antifungal drug discovery. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2024;45:366–384. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2024.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lepak A.J., Marchillo K., Andes D.R. Pharmacodynamic target evaluation of a novel oral glucan synthase inhibitor, SCY-078 (MK-3118), using an in vivo murine invasive candidiasis model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:1265–1272. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04445-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wring S.A., Randolph R., Park S., Abruzzo G., Chen Q., Flattery A., et al. Preclinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic target of SCY-078, a first-in-class orally active antifungal glucan synthesis inhibitor, in murine models of disseminated Candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02068-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Berkow E.L., Angulo D., Lockhart S.R. In vitro activity of a novel glucan synthase inhibitor, scy-078, against clinical isolates of Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00435-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Arendrup M.C., Jørgensen K.M., Hare R.K., Chowdhary A. In vitro activity of ibrexafungerp (SCY-078) against Candida auris isolates as determined by EUCAST methodology and comparison with activity against C. albicans and C. glabrata and with the activities of six comparator agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02136-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Larkin E., Hager C., Chandra J., Mukherjee P.K., Retuerto M., Salem I., et al. The emerging pathogen candida auris: growth phenotype, virulence factors, activity of antifungals, and effect of SCY-078, a novel glucan synthesis inhibitor, on growth morphology and biofilm formation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02396-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ghannoum M., Long L., Larkin E.L., Isham N., Sherif R., Borroto-Esoda K., et al. Evaluation of the antifungal activity of the novel oral glucan synthase inhibitor SCY-078, singly and in combination, for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00244-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Phillips N.A., Rocktashel M., Merjanian L. Ibrexafungerp for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis: design, development and place in therapy. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2023;17:363–367. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S339349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bhosale V.B., Koparde A.A., Thorat V.M. Vulvovaginal candidiasis—an overview of current trends and the latest treatment strategies. Microb Pathog. 2025;200 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Jallow S., Govender N.P. Ibrexafungerp: a first-in-class oral triterpenoid glucan synthase inhibitor. J Fungi (Basel) 2021;7:163. doi: 10.3390/jof7030163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sobel R., Nyirjesy P., Ghannoum M.A., Delchev D.A., Azie N.E., Angulo D., et al. Efficacy and safety of oral ibrexafungerp for the treatment of acute vulvovaginal candidiasis: a global phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled superiority study (VANISH 306) Bjog. 2022;129:412–420. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Garcia-Effron G. Rezafungin-mechanisms of action, susceptibility and resistance: similarities and differences with the other echinocandins. J Fungi (Basel) 2020;6:262. doi: 10.3390/jof6040262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Sofjan A.K., Mitchell A., Shah D.N., Nguyen T., Sim M., Trojcak A., et al. Rezafungin (CD101), a next-generation echinocandin: a systematic literature review and assessment of possible place in therapy. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018;14:58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Ham Y.Y., Lewis J.S., 2nd, Thompson G.R., 3rd Rezafungin: a novel antifungal for the treatment of invasive candidiasis. Future Microbiol. 2021;16:27–36. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2020-0217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Bassetti M., Stewart A., Bartalucci C., Vena A., Giacobbe D.R., Roberts J. Rezafungin acetate for the treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis: a pharmacokinetic evaluation. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2025;21:125–132. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2024.2424899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Zhao Y., Perlin D.S. Review of the novel echinocandin antifungal rezafungin: animal studies and clinical data. J Fungi (Basel) 2020;6:192. doi: 10.3390/jof6040192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kovács R., Tóth Z., Locke J.B., Forgács L., Kardos G., Nagy F., et al. Comparison of in vitro killing activity of rezafungin, anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin against four Candida auris clades in RPMI-1640 in the absence and presence of human serum. Microorganisms. 2021;9:863. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Pfaller M.A., Carvalhaes C., Messer S.A., Rhomberg P.R., Castanheira M. Activity of a long-acting echinocandin, rezafungin, and comparator antifungal agents tested against contemporary invasive fungal isolates (SENTRY Program, 2016 to 2018) Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00099-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Tóth Z., Forgács L., Locke J.B., Kardos G., Nagy F., Kovács R., et al. In vitro activity of rezafungin against common and rare Candida species and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74:3505–3510. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Ong V., Hough G., Schlosser M., Bartizal K., Balkovec J.M., James K.D., et al. Preclinical evaluation of the stability, safety, and efficacy of CD101, a novel echinocandin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:6872–6879. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00701-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Thompson G.R., 3rd, Soriano A., Honore P.M., Bassetti M., Cornely O.A., Kollef M., et al. Efficacy and safety of rezafungin and caspofungin in candidaemia and invasive candidiasis: pooled data from two prospective randomised controlled trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2024;24:319–328. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00551-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Sandison T., Ong V., Lee J., Thye D. Safety and pharmacokinetics of CD101 IV, a novel echinocandin, in healthy adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61 doi: 10.1128/AAC.01627-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zhao Y., Prideaux B., Nagasaki Y., Lee M.H., Chen P.Y., Blanc L., et al. Unraveling drug penetration of echinocandin antifungals at the site of infection in an intra-abdominal abscess model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61 doi: 10.1128/AAC.01009-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Thompson G.R., 3rd, Soriano A., Cornely O.A., Kullberg B.J., Kollef M., Vazquez J., et al. Rezafungin versus caspofungin for treatment of Candidaemia and invasive Candidiasis (ReSTORE): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;401:49–59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02324-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Beier S., Bertilsson S. Bacterial chitin degradation-mechanisms and ecophysiological strategies. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:149. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Chen D.D., Wang Z.B., Wang L.X., Zhao P., Yun C.H., Bai L. Structure, catalysis, chitin transport, and selective inhibition of chitin synthase. Nat Commun. 2023;14:4776. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40479-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Ren Z., Chhetri A., Guan Z., Suo Y., Yokoyama K., Lee S.Y. Structural basis for inhibition and regulation of a chitin synthase from Candida albicans. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2022;29:653–664. doi: 10.1038/s41594-022-00791-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Stenland C.J., Lis L.G., Schendel F.J., Hahn N.J., Smart M.A., Miller A.L., et al. A practical and scalable manufacturing process for an anti-fungal agent, Nikkomycin Z. Org Process Res Dev. 2013;17:265–272. doi: 10.1021/op3003294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Liao G., Li J., Li L., Yang H., Tian Y., Tan H. Selectively improving nikkomycin Z production by blocking the imidazolone biosynthetic pathway of nikkomycin X and uracil feeding in Streptomyces ansochromogenes. Microb Cell Fact. 2009;8:61. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-8-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Graybill J.R., Najvar L.K., Bocanegra R., Hector R.F., Luther M.F. Efficacy of nikkomycin Z in the treatment of murine histoplasmosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:2371–2374. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.9.2371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Shubitz L.F., Roy M.E., Nix D.E., Galgiani J.N. Efficacy of Nikkomycin Z for respiratory coccidioidomycosis in naturally infected dogs. Med Mycol. 2013;51:747–754. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2013.770610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Hector R.F., Zimmer B.L., Pappagianis D. Evaluation of nikkomycins X and Z in murine models of coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, and blastomycosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:587–593. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.4.587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Ganesan L.T., Manavathu E.K., Cutright J.L., Alangaden G.J., Chandrasekar P.H. In-vitro activity of nikkomycin Z alone and in combination with polyenes, triazoles or echinocandins against Aspergillus fumigatus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:961–966. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Cheung Y.Y., Hui M. Effects of echinocandins in combination with Nikkomycin Z against invasive Candida albicans bloodstream isolates and the fks mutants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00619-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Li R.K., Rinaldi M.G. In vitro antifungal activity of nikkomycin Z in combination with fluconazole or itraconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:1401–1405. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.6.1401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Nix D.E., Swezey R.R., Hector R., Galgiani J.N. Pharmacokinetics of nikkomycin Z after single rising oral doses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:2517–2521. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01609-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Seiler G.T., Ostrosky-Zeichner L. Investigational agents for the treatment of resistant yeasts and molds. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2021;15:104–115. doi: 10.1007/s12281-021-00419-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Mutz M., Roemer T. The GPI anchor pathway: a promising antifungal target? Future Med Chem. 2016;8:1387–1391. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2016-0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Mann P.A., McLellan C.A., Koseoglu S., Si Q., Kuzmin E., Flattery A., et al. Chemical genomics-based antifungal drug discovery: targeting glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) precursor biosynthesis. ACS Infect Dis. 2015;1:59–72. doi: 10.1021/id5000212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Hilley J.D., Zawadzki J.L., McConville M.J., Coombs G.H., Mottram J.C. Leishmania mexicana mutants lacking glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI):protein transamidase provide insights into the biosynthesis and functions of GPI-anchored proteins. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:1183–1195. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.4.1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Liston S.D., Whitesell L., McLellan C.A., Mazitschek R., Petraitis V., Petraitiene R., et al. Antifungal activity of gepinacin scaffold glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor biosynthesis inhibitors with improved metabolic stability. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00899-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Watanabe N.A., Miyazaki M., Horii T., Sagane K., Tsukahara K., Hata K. E1210, a new broad-spectrum antifungal, suppresses Candida albicans hyphal growth through inhibition of glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:960–971. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00731-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Dai X., Liu X., Li J., Chen H., Yan C., Li Y., et al. Structural insights into the inhibition mechanism of fungal GWT1 by manogepix. Nat Commun. 2024;15:9194. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53512-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Hüttel W. Structural diversity in echinocandin biosynthesis: the impact of oxidation steps and approaches toward an evolutionary explanation. Z Naturforsch, C: J Biosci. 2017;72:1–20. doi: 10.1515/znc-2016-0156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Umemura M., Okamoto M., Nakayama K., Sagane K., Tsukahara K., Hata K., et al. GWT1 gene is required for inositol acylation of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors in yeast. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:23639–23647. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301044200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Shaw K.J., Ibrahim A.S. Fosmanogepix: a review of the first-in-class broad spectrum agent for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. J Fungi (Basel) 2020;6:239. doi: 10.3390/jof6040239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Petraitiene R., Petraitis V., Maung B.B.W., Mansbach R.S., Hodges M.R., Finkelman M.A., et al. Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of fosmanogepix (APX001) in the treatment of Candida endophthalmitis and Hematogenous meningoencephalitis in nonneutropenic rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65 doi: 10.1128/AAC.01795-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Gebremariam T., Gu Y., Alkhazraji S., Youssef E., Shaw K.J., Ibrahim A.S. The combination treatment of fosmanogepix and liposomal amphotericin B is superior to monotherapy in treating experimental invasive mold infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66 doi: 10.1128/aac.00380-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Hager C.L., Larkin E.L., Long L., Zohra Abidi F., Shaw K.J., Ghannoum M.A. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the antifungal activity of APX001A/APX001 against Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02319-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Hasegawa S., Yamada Y., Iwanami N., Nakayama Y., Nakayama H., Iwatani S., et al. Identification and functional characterization of Candida albicans mannose-ethanolamine phosphotransferase (Mcd4p) Curr Genet. 2019;65:1251–1261. doi: 10.1007/s00294-019-00987-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Zhen C., Lu H., Jiang Y. Novel promising antifungal target proteins for conquering invasive fungal infections. Front Microbiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.911322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Fu Y., Estoppey D., Roggo S., Pistorius D., Fuchs F., Studer C., et al. Jawsamycin exhibits in vivo antifungal properties by inhibiting Spt14/Gpi3-mediated biosynthesis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3387. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17221-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Curto M., Butassi E., Ribas J.C., Svetaz L.A., Cortés J.C.G. Natural products targeting the synthesis of β(1,3)-d-glucan and chitin of the fungal cell wall. Existing drugs and recent findings. Phytomedicine. 2021;88 doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Hayashi K., Yamaguchi Y., Ogita A., Tanaka T., Kubo I., Fujita K.I. Effect of nagilactone E on cell morphology and glucan biosynthesis in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fitoterapia. 2018;128:112–117. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2018.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Wu X.Z., Cheng A.X., Sun L.M., Lou H.X. Effect of plagiochin E, an antifungal macrocyclic bis(bibenzyl), on cell wall chitin synthesis in Candida albicans. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2008;29:1478–1485. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2008.00900.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Lee K.K., Kubo K., Abdelaziz J.A., Cunningham I., de Silva Dantas A., Chen X., et al. Yeast species-specific, differential inhibition of β-1,3-glucan synthesis by poacic acid and caspofungin. Cell Surf. 2018;3:12–25. doi: 10.1016/j.tcsw.2018.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Janeczko M. Emodin reduces the activity of (1,3)-β-d-glucan synthase from Candida albicans and does not interact with caspofungin. Pol J Microbiol. 2018;67:463–470. doi: 10.21307/pjm-2018-054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Deng J.H., Zhang X.G., Wang G.S., Luo J.N., Wang J., Qi X.M., et al. Effect of Cinnamaldehyde on C. albicans cell wall and (1,3)-β-d-glucans in vivo. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022;22:32. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03468-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Sant D.G., Tupe S.G., Ramana C.V., Deshpande M.V. Fungal cell membrane-promising drug target for antifungal therapy. J Appl Microbiol. 2016;121:1498–1510. doi: 10.1111/jam.13301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Ito K., Kizawa Y., Kimura G., Nishimoto Y., Daly L., Knowles I., et al. Relationship between anti-fungal effects and lung exposure of PC945, a novel inhaled antifungal agent, in Aspergillus fumigatus infected mice: pulmonary PK-PD analysis of anti-fungal PC945. Eur J Pharmaceut Sci. 2021;163 doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Colley T., Alanio A., Kelly S.L., Sehra G., Kizawa Y., Warrilow A.G.S., et al. In vitro and in vivo antifungal profile of a novel and long-acting inhaled azole, PC945, on Aspergillus fumigatus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02280-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Rudramurthy S.M., Colley T., Abdolrasouli A., Ashman J., Dhaliwal M., Kaur H., et al. In vitro antifungal activity of a novel topical triazole PC945 against emerging yeast Candida auris. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74:2943–2949. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Colley T., Sehra G., Daly L., Kimura G., Nakaoki T., Nishimoto Y., et al. Antifungal synergy of a topical triazole, PC945, with a systemic triazole against respiratory Aspergillus fumigatus infection. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45890-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Murray A., Cass L., Ito K., Pagani N., Armstrong-James D., Dalal P., et al. PC945, a novel inhaled antifungal agent, for the treatment of respiratory fungal infections. J Fungi (Basel) 2020;6:373. doi: 10.3390/jof6040373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Wilson D.T., Dimondi V.P., Johnson S.W., Jones T.M., Drew R.H. Role of isavuconazole in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Therapeut Clin Risk Manag. 2016;12:1197–1206. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S90335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Seyedmousavi S., Verweij P.E., Mouton J.W. Isavuconazole, a broad-spectrum triazole for the treatment of systemic fungal diseases. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015;13:9–27. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.990382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Gregson L., Goodwin J., Johnson A., McEntee L., Moore C.B., Richardson M., et al. In vitro susceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus to isavuconazole: correlation with itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:5778–5780. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01141-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Rudramurthy S.M., Chakrabarti A., Geertsen E., Mouton J.W., Meis J.F. In vitro activity of isavuconazole against 208 Aspergillus flavus isolates in comparison with 7 other antifungal agents: assessment according to the methodology of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;71:370–377. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Guinea J., Peláez T., Recio S., Torres-Narbona M., Bouza E. In vitro antifungal activities of isavuconazole (BAL4815), voriconazole, and fluconazole against 1007 isolates of zygomycete, Candida, Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Scedosporium species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1396–1400. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01512-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Sanglard D., Coste A.T. Activity of isavuconazole and other azoles against candida clinical isolates and yeast model systems with known azole resistance mechanisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:229–238. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02157-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Falci D.R., Pasqualotto A.C. Profile of isavuconazole and its potential in the treatment of severe invasive fungal infections. Infect Drug Resist. 2013;6:163–174. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S51340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Hoekstra W.J., Garvey E.P., Moore W.R., Rafferty S.W., Yates C.M., Schotzinger R.J. Design and optimization of highly-selective fungal CYP51 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2014;24:3455–3458. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.05.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Warrilow A.G., Parker J.E., Price C.L., Nes W.D., Garvey E.P., Hoekstra W.J., et al. The investigational drug VT-1129 is a highly potent inhibitor of Cryptococcus Species CYP51 but only weakly inhibits the human enzyme. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:4530–4538. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00349-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Warrilow A.G., Hull C.M., Parker J.E., Garvey E.P., Hoekstra W.J., Moore W.R., et al. The clinical candidate VT-1161 is a highly potent inhibitor of Candida albicans CYP51 but fails to bind the human enzyme. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:7121–7127. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03707-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Martens M.G., Maximos B., Degenhardt T., Person K., Curelop S., Ghannoum M., et al. Phase 3 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of oteseconazole in the treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis and acute vulvovaginal candidiasis infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.023. 880.e1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Nishimoto A.T., Whaley S.G., Wiederhold N.P., Zhang Q., Yates C.M., Hoekstra W.J., et al. Impact of the major Candida glabrata triazole resistance determinants on the activity of the novel investigational tetrazoles VT-1598 and VT-1161. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63 doi: 10.1128/AAC.01304-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Nishimoto A.T., Wiederhold N.P., Flowers S.A., Zhang Q., Kelly S.L., Morschhäuser J., et al. In vitro activities of the novel investigational tetrazoles VT-1161 and VT-1598 compared to the triazole antifungals against azole-resistant strains and clinical isolates of Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00341-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Lockhart S.R., Fothergill A.W., Iqbal N., Bolden C.B., Grossman N.T., Garvey E.P., et al. The investigational fungal Cyp51 inhibitor VT-1129 demonstrates potent in vitro activity against Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:2528–2531. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02770-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Wiederhold N.P., Shubitz L.F., Najvar L.K., Jaramillo R., Olivo M., Catano G., et al. The novel fungal Cyp51 inhibitor VT-1598 is efficacious in experimental models of central nervous system coccidioidomycosis caused by Coccidioides posadasii and Coccidioides immitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02258-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Garvey E.P., Sharp A.D., Warn P.A., Yates C.M., Schotzinger R.J. The novel fungal CYP51 inhibitor VT-1598 is efficacious alone and in combination with liposomal amphotericin B in a murine model of cryptococcal meningitis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:2815–2822. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Break T.J., Desai J.V., Healey K.R., Natarajan M., Ferre E.M.N., Henderson C., et al. VT-1598 inhibits the in vitro growth of mucosal Candida strains and protects against fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant oral candidiasis in IL-17 signalling-deficient mice. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:2089–2094. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Garvey E.P., Hoekstra W.J., Schotzinger R.J., Sobel J.D., Lilly E.A., Fidel P.L., Jr. Efficacy of the clinical agent VT-1161 against fluconazole-sensitive and -resistant Candida albicans in a murine model of vaginal candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:5567–5573. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00185-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Maione A., Mileo A., Pugliese S., Siciliano A., Cirillo L., Carraturo F., et al. VT-1161-A tetrazole for management of mono- and dual-species biofilms. Microorganisms. 2023;11:237. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Mota Fernandes C., Del Poeta M. Fungal sphingolipids: role in the regulation of virulence and potential as targets for future antifungal therapies. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020;18:1083–1092. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1792288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Haranahalli K., Lazzarini C., Sun Y., Zambito J., Pathiranage S., McCarthy J.B., et al. SAR studies on aromatic acylhydrazone-based inhibitors of fungal sphingolipid synthesis as next-generation antifungal agents. J Med Chem. 2019;62:8249–8273. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Arya K., Usmani S.A., Bhardwaj N., Kumar M., Rudramurthy S.M., Prasad R., et al. Impact of sphingolipid synthesis inhibition on the drug susceptibility patterns of Trichophyton species. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024;109 doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Bouz G., Doležal M. Advances in antifungal drug development: an up-to-date mini review. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14:1312. doi: 10.3390/ph14121312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Aeed P.A., Young C.L., Nagiec M.M., Elhammer A.P. Inhibition of inositol phosphorylceramide synthase by the cyclic peptide aureobasidin A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:496–504. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00633-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Rollin-Pinheiro R., de Moraes D.C., Bayona-Pacheco B., Curvelo J., Dos Santos-Freitas G.M.P., Xisto M., et al. Structural and functional alterations caused by aureobasidin a in clinical resistant strains of Candida spp. J Fungi (Basel) 2023;9:1115. doi: 10.3390/jof9111115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Kollu N.V., LaJeunesse D.R. Cell rupture and morphogenesis control of the dimorphic yeast Candida albicans by nanostructured surfaces. ACS Omega. 2021;6:1361–1369. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Takesako K., Kuroda H., Inoue T., Haruna F., Yoshikawa Y., Kato I., et al. Biological properties of aureobasidin A, a cyclic depsipeptide antifungal antibiotic. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1993;46:1414–1420. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.46.1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Kim J.H., Cheng L.W., Land K.M. Advances in antifungal development: discovery of new drugs and drug repurposing. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15:787. doi: 10.3390/ph15070787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Chen L., Tian X., Zhang L., Wang W., Hu P., Ma Z., et al. Brain glucose induces tolerance of Cryptococcus neoformans to amphotericin B during meningitis. Nat Microbiol. 2024;9:346–358. doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01561-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Torrado J.J., Serrano D.R., Uchegbu I.F. The oral delivery of amphotericin B. Ther Deliv. 2013;4:9–12. doi: 10.4155/tde.12.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Gray K.C., Palacios D.S., Dailey I., Endo M.M., Uno B.E., Wilcock B.C., et al. Amphotericin primarily kills yeast by simply binding ergosterol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:2234–2239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117280109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Adler-Moore J. AmBisome targeting to fungal infections. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1994;14(Suppl 5):S3–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Adler-Moore J.P., Chiang S.M., Satorius A., Guerra D., McAndrews B., McManus E.J., et al. Treatment of murine candidosis and cryptococcosis with a unilamellar liposomal amphotericin B formulation (AmBisome) J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991;28(Suppl B):63–71. doi: 10.1093/jac/28.suppl_b.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Robinson R.F., Nahata M.C. A comparative review of conventional and lipid formulations of amphotericin B. J Clin Pharm Therapeut. 1999;24:249–257. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.1999.00220.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Batista-Duharte A., Lastre M., Romeu B., Portuondo D.L., Téllez-Martínez D., Manente F.A., et al. Antifungal and immunomodulatory activity of a novel cochleate for amphotericin B delivery against Sporothrix schenckii. Int Immunopharmacol. 2016;40:277–287. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Delmas G., Park S., Chen Z.W., Tan F., Kashiwazaki R., Zarif L., et al. Efficacy of orally delivered cochleates containing amphotericin B in a murine model of aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:2704–2707. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2704-2707.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Lu R., Hollingsworth C., Qiu J., Wang A., Hughes E., Xin X., et al. Efficacy of oral encochleated amphotericin B in a mouse model of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis. mBio. 2019;10 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00724-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Santangelo R., Paderu P., Delmas G., Chen Z.W., Mannino R., Zarif L., et al. Efficacy of oral cochleate-amphotericin B in a mouse model of systemic candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:2356–2360. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.9.2356-2360.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Zarif L., Graybill J.R., Perlin D., Najvar L., Bocanegra R., Mannino R.J. Antifungal activity of amphotericin B cochleates against Candida albicans infection in a mouse model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1463–1469. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.6.1463-1469.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Boulware D.R., Atukunda M., Kagimu E., Musubire A.K., Akampurira A., Tugume L., et al. Oral lipid nanocrystal amphotericin B for cryptococcal meningitis: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;77:1659–1667. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Bahr N.C., Rolfes M.A., Musubire A., Nabeta H., Williams D.A., Rhein J., et al. Standardized electrolyte supplementation and fluid management improves survival during amphotericin therapy for cryptococcal meningitis in resource-limited settings. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2014;1 doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofu070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Hoenigl M., Arastehfar A., Arendrup M.C., Brüggemann R., Carvalho A., Chiller T., et al. Novel antifungals and treatment approaches to tackle resistance and improve outcomes of invasive fungal disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024;37 doi: 10.1128/cmr.00074-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Xu H., Mou Y.H., Guo M.B., Zhang R., Yan Z.Z., An R., et al. Discovery of novel selenium-containing azole derivatives as antifungal agents by exploiting the hydrophobic cleft of CYP51. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;243 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Bao A., Jiang W., Xie X., Wang D., Deng Z., Wang J., et al. Design, synthesis, bioactive evaluation, and molecular dynamics simulation of novel 4H-pyrano[3,2-c]pyridine analogues as potential sterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51) inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2024;67:7954–7972. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c00032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Wen H., Shi H., Jiang N., Qiu J., Lin F., Kou Y. Antifungal mechanisms of silver nanoparticles on mycotoxin producing rice false smut fungus. iScience. 2023;26 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Studt-Reinhold L., Atanasoff-Kardjalieff A.K., Berger H., Petersen C., Bachleitner S., Sulyok M., et al. H3K27me3 is vital for fungal development and secondary metabolite gene silencing, and substitutes for the loss of H3K9me3 in the plant pathogen Fusarium proliferatum. PLoS Genet. 2024;20 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Wang T., Yang W., Liu Y., Li W., Wang Y., Liu N., et al. Jumonji histone demethylase inhibitor JIB-04 as a broad-spectrum antifungal agent. ACS Infect Dis. 2022;8:1316–1323. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Liu X., Li W., Liu Y., Wang X., Shi Q., Yang W., et al. Discovery of new fungal jumonji H3K27 demethylase inhibitors for the treatment of Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida auris infections. Eur J Med Chem. 2025;281 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.117028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Zhou Y., Meng X., Chen F., Xiong M., Zhang W., Wang K.J. Newly discovered antimicrobial peptide Scyampcin(44–63) from Scylla paramamosain exhibits a multitargeted candidacidal mechanism in vitro and is effective in a murine model of vaginal candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023;67 doi: 10.1128/aac.00022-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Yang K., Zhang J., Xiao B. Oral garlic-derived nanoparticles improve cancer immunotherapy. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2025;15:1199–1201. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.12.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Pai S.T., Platt M.W. Antifungal effects of Allium sativum (garlic) extract against the Aspergillus species involved in otomycosis. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1995;20:14–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.1995.tb00397.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Li Z., Li Z., Yang J., Lu C., Li Y., Luo Y., et al. Allicin shows antifungal efficacy against Cryptococcus neoformans by blocking the fungal cell membrane. Front Microbiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1012516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Kuda T., Iwai A., Yano T. Effect of red pepper Capsicum annuum var. conoides and garlic Allium sativum on plasma lipid levels and cecal microflora in mice fed beef tallow. Food Chem Toxicol. 2004;42:1695–1700. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Schier C., Gruhlke M.C.H., Reucher G., Slusarenko A.J., Rink L. Combating black fungus: using allicin as a potent antifungal agent against mucorales. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24 doi: 10.3390/ijms242417519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.An M., Shen H., Cao Y., Zhang J., Cai Y., Wang R., et al. Allicin enhances the oxidative damage effect of amphotericin B against Candida albicans. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;33:258–263. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Jacob S., Schüffler A., Thines E. Hog1p activation by marasmic acid through inhibition of the histidine kinase Sln1p. Pest Manag Sci. 2016;72:1268–1274. doi: 10.1002/ps.4257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Silva S., Negri M., Henriques M., Oliveira R., Williams D.W., Azeredo J. Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis: biology, epidemiology, pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36:288–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Nakayama H., Tanabe K., Bard M., Hodgson W., Wu S., Takemori D., et al. The Candida glabrata putative sterol transporter gene CgAUS1 protects cells against azoles in the presence of serum. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:1264–1272. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Pelletier C., Shaw S., Alsayegh S., Brown A.J.P., Lorenz A. Candida auris undergoes adhesin-dependent and -independent cellular aggregation. PLoS Pathog. 2024;20 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Morelli K.A., Kerkaert J.D., Cramer R.A. Aspergillus fumigatus biofilms: toward understanding how growth as a multicellular network increases antifungal resistance and disease progression. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Seidler M.J., Salvenmoser S., Müller F.M. Aspergillus fumigatus forms biofilms with reduced antifungal drug susceptibility on bronchial epithelial cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:4130–4136. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00234-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Beauvais A., Latgé J.P. Aspergillus biofilm in vitro and in vivo. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MB-0017-2015. Available from: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Mohd Nasuha N.A., Choo Y.M. A new flavone from Malaysia Borneo Marsdenia tinctoria. Nat Prod Res. 2016;30:1532–1536. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2015.1118629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Lee J.H., Kim Y.G., Park I., Lee J. Antifungal and antibiofilm activities of flavonoids against Candida albicans: focus on 3,2′-dihydroxyflavone as a potential therapeutic agent. Biofilms. 2024;8 doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.100218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Lee J.H., Kim Y.G., Khadke S.K., Yamano A., Watanabe A., Lee J. Correction to inhibition of biofilm formation by Candida albicans and polymicrobial microorganisms by nepodin via hyphal-growth suppression. ACS Infect Dis. 2020;6:1283. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.De Sordi L., Mühlschlegel F.A. Quorum sensing and fungal-bacterial interactions in Candida albicans: a communicative network regulating microbial coexistence and virulence. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009;9:990–999. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Jin X., Hou X., Wang X., Zhang M., Chen J., Song M., et al. Characterization of an allosteric inhibitor of fungal-specific C-24 sterol methyltransferase to treat Candida albicans infections. Cell Chem Biol. 2023;30 doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2023.04.010. 553–68.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Jaromin A., Zarnowski R., Markowski A., Zagórska A., Johnson C.J., Etezadi H., et al. Liposomal formulation of a new antifungal hybrid compound provides protection against Candida auris in the ex vivo skin colonization model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024;68 doi: 10.1128/aac.00955-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Jacobs S.E., Jacobs J.L., Dennis E.K., Taimur S., Rana M., Patel D., et al. Candida auris pan-drug-resistant to four classes of antifungal agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66 doi: 10.1128/aac.00053-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Rajput A., Thakur A., Sharma S., Kumar M. aBiofilm: a resource of anti-biofilm agents and their potential implications in targeting antibiotic drug resistance. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D894–D900. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Lindsay A.K., Deveau A., Piispanen A.E., Hogan D.A. Farnesol and cyclic AMP signaling effects on the hypha-to-yeast transition in Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell. 2012;11:1219–1225. doi: 10.1128/EC.00144-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Louvet M., Li J., Brandalise D., Bachmann D., Sala de Oyanguren F., Labes D., et al. Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in Candida auris. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12 doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01531-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Dekkerová J., Černáková L., Kendra S., Borghi E., Ottaviano E., Willinger B., et al. Farnesol boosts the antifungal effect of fluconazole and modulates resistance in Candida auris through regulation of the CDR1 and ERG11 genes. J Fungi (Basel) 2022;8:783. doi: 10.3390/jof8080783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.D’Souza C.A., Heitman J. Conserved cAMP signaling cascades regulate fungal development and virulence. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001;25:349–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00582.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Lengeler K.B., Davidson R.C., D’Souza C., Harashima T., Shen W.C., Wang P., et al. Signal transduction cascades regulating fungal development and virulence. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64:746–785. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.64.4.746-785.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Oliver J.D., Sibley G.E.M., Beckmann N., Dobb K.S., Slater M.J., McEntee L., et al. F901318 represents a novel class of antifungal drug that inhibits dihydroorotate dehydrogenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:12809–12814. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608304113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Jones M.E. Pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis in animals: genes, enzymes, and regulation of UMP biosynthesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1980;49:253–279. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.49.070180.001345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Wiederhold N.P. Review of the novel investigational antifungal olorofim. J Fungi (Basel) 2020;6:122. doi: 10.3390/jof6030122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Jørgensen K.M., Astvad K.M.T., Hare R.K., Arendrup M.C. EUCAST determination of olorofim (F901318) susceptibility of mold species, method validation, and MICs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00487-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Vanbiervliet Y., Nieuwenhuyse T.V., Aerts R., Lagrou K., Spriet I., Maertens J. Correction: review of the novel antifungal drug olorofim (F901318) BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24:1395. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10295-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Haidar G., Singh N. How we approach combination antifungal therapy for invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis in transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2018;102:1815–1823. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Negri C.E., Johnson A., McEntee L., Box H., Whalley S., Schwartz J.A., et al. Pharmacodynamics of the novel antifungal agent F901318 for acute sinopulmonary aspergillosis caused by Aspergillus flavus. J Infect Dis. 2018;217:1118–1127. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Wiederhold N.P., Najvar L.K., Jaramillo R., Olivo M., Birch M., Law D., et al. The orotomide olorofim is efficacious in an experimental model of central nervous system coccidioidomycosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00999-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Seyedmousavi S., Chang Y.C., Youn J.H., Law D., Birch M., Rex J.H., et al. In vivo efficacy of olorofim against systemic Scedosporiosis and Lomentosporiosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00434-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Rivero-Menendez O., Cuenca-Estrella M., Alastruey-Izquierdo A. In vitro activity of olorofim against clinical isolates of Scedosporium species and Lomentospora prolificans using EUCAST and CLSI methodologies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75:3582–3585. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Nishikawa H., Yamada E., Shibata T., Uchihashi S., Fan H., Hayakawa H., et al. Uptake of T-2307, a novel arylamidine, in Candida albicans. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:1681–1687. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Shibata T., Takahashi T., Yamada E., Kimura A., Nishikawa H., Hayakawa H., et al. T-2307 causes collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential in yeast. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:5892–5897. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05954-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Nishikawa H., Sakagami T., Yamada E., Fukuda Y., Hayakawa H., Nomura N., et al. T-2307, a novel arylamidine, is transported into Candida albicans by a high-affinity spermine and spermidine carrier regulated by Agp2. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:1845–1855. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Yamashita K., Miyazaki T., Fukuda Y., Mitsuyama J., Saijo T., Shimamura S., et al. The novel arylamidine T-2307 selectively disrupts yeast mitochondrial function by inhibiting respiratory chain complexes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00374-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Fera M.T., La Camera E., De Sarro A. New triazoles and echinocandins: mode of action, in vitro activity and mechanisms of resistance. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009;7:981–998. doi: 10.1586/eri.09.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Mitsuyama J., Nomura N., Hashimoto K., Yamada E., Nishikawa H., Kaeriyama M., et al. In vitro and in vivo antifungal activities of T-2307, a novel arylamidine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1318–1324. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01159-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Wiederhold N.P., Najvar L.K., Fothergill A.W., Bocanegra R., Olivo M., McCarthy D.I., et al. The novel arylamidine T-2307 maintains in vitro and in vivo activity against echinocandin-resistant Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:1341–1343. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04228-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Yamada E., Nishikawa H., Nomura N., Mitsuyama J. T-2307 shows efficacy in a murine model of Candida glabrata infection despite in vitro trailing growth phenomena. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:3630–3634. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00355-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Nishikawa H., Fukuda Y., Mitsuyama J., Tashiro M., Tanaka A., Takazono T., et al. In vitro and in vivo antifungal activities of T-2307, a novel arylamidine, against Cryptococcus gattii: an emerging fungal pathogen. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:1709–1713. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Nakamura I., Kanasaki R., Yoshikawa K., Furukawa S., Fujie A., Hamamoto H., et al. Discovery of a new antifungal agent ASP2397 using a silkworm model of Aspergillus fumigatus infection. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2017;70:41–44. doi: 10.1038/ja.2016.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Nakamura I., Yoshimura S., Masaki T., Takase S., Ohsumi K., Hashimoto M., et al. ASP2397: a novel antifungal agent produced by Acremonium persicinum MF-347833. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2017;70:45–51. doi: 10.1038/ja.2016.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Dietl A.M., Misslinger M., Aguiar M.M., Ivashov V., Teis D., Pfister J., et al. The siderophore transporter Sit1 determines ssusceptibility to the antifungal VL-2397. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e00807–e00819. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00807-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Hsiang T., Baillie D.L. Comparison of the yeast proteome to other fungal genomes to find core fungal genes. J Mol Evol. 2005;60:475–483. doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-0218-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Mammen M.P., Armas D., Hughes F.H., Hopkins A.M., Fisher C.L., Resch P.A., et al. First-in-human phase 1 study to assess safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a novel antifungal drug, VL-2397, in healthy adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00969-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Shaw K.J. GR-2397: review of the novel siderophore-like antifungal agent for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. J Fungi (Basel) 2022;8:909. doi: 10.3390/jof8090909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Silva R.M., Caleffi G.S., Cotinguiba F. Alkaloids from Waltheria spp. (Malvaceae): chemosystematic aspects, biosynthesis, total synthesis, and biological activities. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25 doi: 10.3390/ijms252413659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Emile A., Waikedre J., Herrenknecht C., Fourneau C., Gantier J.C., Hnawia E., et al. Bioassay-guided isolation of antifungal alkaloids from Melochia odorata. Phytother Res. 2007;21:398–400. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Cretton S., Dorsaz S., Azzollini A., Favre-Godal Q., Marcourt L., Ebrahimi S.N., et al. Antifungal quinoline alkaloids from Waltheria indica. J Nat Prod. 2016;79:300–307. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Hendricson A., Umlauf S., Choi J.Y., Thekkiniath J., Surovtseva Y.V., Fuller K.K., et al. High-throughput screening for phosphatidylserine decarboxylase inhibitors using a distyrylbenzene-bis-aldehyde (DSB-3)-based fluorescence assay. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:12146–12156. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Khandelwal N.K., Sarkar P., Gaur N.A., Chattopadhyay A., Prasad R. Phosphatidylserine decarboxylase governs plasma membrane fluidity and impacts drug susceptibilities of Candida albicans cells. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2018;1860:2308–2319. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Zhang X., Hu D., Sun X., Gu Y., Zhou Y., Su C., et al. PHGDH/SYK: a hub integrating anti-fungal immunity and serine metabolism. Cell Death Differ. 2024;31:1664–1678. doi: 10.1038/s41418-024-01374-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Binder J., Shadkchan Y., Osherov N., Krappmann S. The essential thioredoxin reductase of the human pathogenic mold Aspergillus fumigatus is a promising antifungal target. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1383. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Zhao Y., Lyu Y., Zhang Y., Li S., Zhang Y., Liu Y., et al. The fungal-specific subunit i/j of F1Fo-ATP synthase stimulates the pathogenicity of Candida albicans independent of oxidative phosphorylation. Med Mycol. 2021;59:639–652. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myaa094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Li S., Zhao Y., Zhang Y., Zhang Y., Zhang Z., Tang C., et al. The δ subunit of F1Fo-ATP synthase is required for pathogenicity of Candida albicans. Nat Commun. 2021;12:6041. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26313-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Wang L., Chen R., Weng Q., Lin S., Wang H., Li L., et al. SPT20 regulates the Hog1–MAPK pathway and is involved in Candida albicans response to hyperosmotic stress. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:213. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Navarro-Muñoz J.C., Collemare J. Evolutionary histories of type III polyketide synthases in fungi. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:3018. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Bowring B.G., Sethiya P., Desmarini D., Lev S., Tran Le L., Bahn Y.S., et al. Dysregulating PHO signaling via the CDK machinery differentially impacts energy metabolism, calcineurin signaling, and virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans. mBio. 2023;14 doi: 10.1128/mbio.03551-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Zhou M., Liu L., Cong Z., Jiang W., Xiao X., Xie J., et al. A dual-targeting antifungal is effective against multidrug-resistant human fungal pathogens. Nat Microbiol. 2024;9:1325–1339. doi: 10.1038/s41564-024-01662-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Liu N., Tu J., Huang Y., Yang W., Wang Q., Li Z., et al. Target- and prodrug-based design for fungal diseases and cancer-associated fungal infections. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;197 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Zhu T., Chen X., Li C., Tu J., Liu N., Xu D., et al. Lanosterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51)/histone deacetylase (HDAC) dual inhibitors for treatment of Candida tropicalis and Cryptococcus neoformans infections. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;221 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Li C., Tu J., Han G., Liu N., Sheng C. Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90)/Histone deacetylase (HDAC) dual inhibitors for the treatment of azoles-resistant Candida albicans. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;227 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Dong Y., Liu M., Wang J., Ding Z., Sun B. Construction of antifungal dual-target (SE, CYP51) pharmacophore models and the discovery of novel antifungal inhibitors. RSC Adv. 2019;9:26302–26314. doi: 10.1039/c9ra03713f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Hoobler E.K., Rai G., Warrilow A.G., Perry S.C., Smyrniotis C.J., Jadhav A., et al. Discovery of a novel dual fungal CYP51/human 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor: implications for anti-fungal therapy. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Sun B., Xia N., Zhang X. Progress in immunotherapy. Sci China Life Sci. 2023;66:653–657. doi: 10.1007/s11427-023-2322-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Lazzaro B.P., Zasloff M., Rolff J. Antimicrobial peptides: application informed by evolution. Science. 2020;368 doi: 10.1126/science.aau5480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Fan D., Liu X., Ren Y., Luo Z., Li Y., Dong J., et al. Harnessing antimicrobial peptide-coupled photosensitizer to combat drug-resistant biofilm infections through enhanced photodynamic therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2024;14:1759–1771. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Zhang Q.Y., Yan Z.B., Meng Y.M., Hong X.Y., Shao G., Ma J.J., et al. Antimicrobial peptides: mechanism of action, activity and clinical potential. Mil Med Res. 2021;8:48. doi: 10.1186/s40779-021-00343-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Guerra M.E.S., Vieira B., Calazans A., Destro G.V., Melo K., Rodrigues E., et al. Recent advances in the therapeutic potential of cathelicidins. Front Microbiol. 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1405760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Mercer D.K., O’Neil D.A. Innate inspiration: antifungal peptides and other immunotherapeutics from the host immune response. Front Immunol. 2020;11:2177. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Mookherjee N., Anderson M.A., Haagsman H.P., Davidson D.J. Antimicrobial host defence peptides: functions and clinical potential. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19:311–332. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0058-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Correction to: NP213 (Novexatin®): a unique therapy candidate for onychomycosis with a differentiated safety and efficacy profile. Med Mycol. 2023;61 doi: 10.1093/mmy/myad088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Velden W.J., van Iersel T.M., Blijlevens N.M., Donnelly J.P. Safety and tolerability of the antimicrobial peptide human lactoferrin 1-11 (hLF1-11) BMC Med. 2009;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-7-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Paquette D.W., Simpson D.M., Friden P., Braman V., Williams R.C. Safety and clinical effects of topical histatin gels in humans with experimental gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29:1051–1058. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.291201.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Van Dyke T., Paquette D., Grossi S., Braman V., Massaro J., D’Agostino R., et al. Clinical and microbial evaluation of a histatin-containing mouthrinse in humans with experimental gingivitis: a phase-2 multi-center study. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29:168–176. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290212.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Wang H., Ai L., Zhang Y., Cheng J., Yu H., Li C., et al. The effects of antimicrobial peptide Nal-P-113 on inhibiting periodontal pathogens and improving periodontal status. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/1805793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Lipsky B.A., Holroyd K.J., Zasloff M. Topical versus systemic antimicrobial therapy for treating mildly infected diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, multicenter trial of pexiganan cream. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:1537–1545. doi: 10.1086/593185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Rijsbergen M., Rijneveld R., Todd M., Feiss G.L., Kouwenhoven S.T.P., Quint K.D., et al. Results of phase 2 trials exploring the safety and efficacy of omiganan in patients with human papillomavirus-induced genital lesions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;86:2133–2143. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Kollef M., Pittet D., Sánchez García M., Chastre J., Fagon J.Y., Bonten M., et al. A randomized double-blind trial of iseganan in prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:91–97. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200504-656OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Nilsson A.C., Janson H., Wold H., Fugelli A., Andersson K., Håkangård C., et al. LTX-109 is a novel agent for nasal decolonization of methicillin-resistant and -sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:145–151. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03513-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Miller C.H., Maher S.G., Young H.A. Clinical use of interferon-gamma. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1182:69–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05069.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Delsing C.E., Gresnigt M.S., Leentjens J., Preijers F., Frager F.A., Kox M., et al. Interferon-gamma as adjunctive immunotherapy for invasive fungal infections: a case series. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:166. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.A controlled trial of interferon gamma to prevent infection in chronic granulomatous disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:509–516. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102213240801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Pasic S., Abinun M., Pistignjat B., Vlajic B., Rakic J., Sarjanovic L., et al. Aspergillus osteomyelitis in chronic granulomatous disease: treatment with recombinant gamma-interferon and itraconazole. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996;15:833–834. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199609000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Saulsbury F.T. Successful treatment of aspergillus brain abscess with itraconazole and interferon-gamma in a patient with chronic granulomatous disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:E137–E139. doi: 10.1086/320158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Riddell L.A., Pinching A.J., Hill S., Ng T.T., Arbe E., Lapham G.P., et al. A phase III study of recombinant human interferon gamma to prevent opportunistic infections in advanced HIV disease. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2001;17:789–797. doi: 10.1089/088922201750251981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Bodasing N., Seaton R.A., Shankland G.S., Pithie A. Gamma-interferon treatment for resistant oropharyngeal candidiasis in an HIV-positive patient. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50:765–766. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Jarvis J.N., Meintjes G., Rebe K., Williams G.N., Bicanic T., Williams A., et al. Adjunctive interferon-γ immunotherapy for the treatment of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: a randomized controlled trial. AIDS. 2012;26:1105–1113. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283536a93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Poynton C.H., Barnes R.A., Rees J. Interferon gamma and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of hepatosplenic candidosis in patients with acute leukemia. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:239–240. doi: 10.1086/517077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Dignani M.C., Rex J.H., Chan K.W., Dow G., deMagalhaes-Silverman M., Maddox A., et al. Immunomodulation with interferon-gamma and colony-stimulating factors for refractory fungal infections in patients with leukemia. Cancer. 2005;104:199–204. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Armstrong-James D., Teo I.A., Shrivastava S., Petrou M.A., Taube D., Dorling A., et al. Exogenous interferon-gamma immunotherapy for invasive fungal infections in kidney transplant patients. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:1796–1803. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03094.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Grigull L., Beilken A., Schmid H., Kirschner P., Sykora K.W., Linderkamp C., et al. Secondary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections with combination antifungal therapy and G-CSF-mobilized granulocyte transfusions in three children with hematological malignancies. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14:783–786. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0910-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Du B., Shen N., Hu J., Tao Y., Mo X., Cao Q. Complete clinical remission of invasive Candida infection with CARD9 deficiency after G-CSF treatment. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;70 doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Sahin B., Paydaş S., Coşar E., Biçakçi K., Hazar B. Role of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of mucormycosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;15:866–869. doi: 10.1007/BF01691218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Büchner T., Hiddemann W., Koenigsmann M., Zühlsdorf M., Wörmann B., Boeckmann A., et al. Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia at higher age or after relapse. Blood. 1991;78:1190–1197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Wan L., Zhang Y., Lai Y., Jiang M., Song Y., Zhou J., et al. Effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on prevention and treatment of invasive fungal disease in recipients of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: a prospective multicenter randomized phase IV trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3999–4006. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.5121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295.Bodey G.P., Anaissie E., Gutterman J., Vadhan-Raj S. Role of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as adjuvant treatment in neutropenic patients with bacterial and fungal infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994;13(Suppl 2):S18–S22. doi: 10.1007/BF01973597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296.Chen T.K., Batra J.S., Michalik D.E., Casillas J., Patel R., Ruiz M.E., et al. Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhu GM-CSF) as adjuvant therapy for invasive fungal diseases. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9 doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Vazquez J.A., Hidalgo J.A., De Bono S. Use of sargramostim (rh-GM-CSF) as adjunctive treatment of fluconazole-refractory oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients with AIDS: a pilot study. HIV Clin Trials. 2000;1:23–29. doi: 10.1310/LF5T-WYY7-0U3E-G8BQ. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Nemunaitis J., Meyers J.D., Buckner C.D., Shannon-Dorcy K., Mori M., Shulman H., et al. Phase I trial of recombinant human macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with invasive fungal infections. Blood. 1991;78:907–913. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299.Edwards J.E., Jr., Schwartz M.M., Schmidt C.S., Sobel J.D., Nyirjesy P., Schodel F., et al. A fungal immunotherapeutic vaccine (NDV-3A) for treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis—a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:1928–1936. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300.De Bernardis F., Graziani S., Tirelli F., Antonopoulou S. Candida vaginitis: virulence, host response and vaccine prospects. Med Mycol. 2018;56:26–31. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301.Levy D.A., Bohbot J.M., Catalan F., Normier G., Pinel A.M., Dussourd d’Hinterland L. Phase II study of D.651, an oral vaccine designed to prevent recurrences of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Vaccine. 1989;7:337–340. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(89)90197-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Pappagianis D. Evaluation of the protective efficacy of the killed Coccidioides immitis spherule vaccine in humans. The Valley Fever Vaccine Study Group. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;148:656–660. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.3.656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Zebedee S.L., Koduri R.K., Mukherjee J., Mukherjee S., Lee S., Sauer D.F., et al. Mouse-human immunoglobulin G1 chimeric antibodies with activities against Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1507–1514. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.7.1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Pachl J., Svoboda P., Jacobs F., Vandewoude K., van der Hoven B., Spronk P., et al. A randomized, blinded, multicenter trial of lipid-associated amphotericin B alone versus in combination with an antibody-based inhibitor of heat shock protein 90 in patients with invasive candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:1404–1413. doi: 10.1086/503428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305.Kumaresan P.R., Manuri P.R., Albert N.D., Maiti S., Singh H., Mi T., et al. Bioengineering T cells to target carbohydrate to treat opportunistic fungal infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:10660–10665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312789111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Seif M., Kakoschke T.K., Ebel F., Bellet M.M., Trinks N., Renga G., et al. CAR T cells targeting Aspergillus fumigatus are effective at treating invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in preclinical models. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abh1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Dos Santos M.H., Machado M.P., Kumaresan P.R., da Silva T.A. Titan cells and yeast forms of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii Are recognized by GXMR-CAR. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1886. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9091886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Díaz R., Soundar E., Hartman S.K., Dreyer Z., Teruya J., Hui S.K. Granulocyte transfusions for children with infection and neutropenia or granulocyte dysfunction. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014;31:425–434. doi: 10.3109/08880018.2013.868562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309.Nikolajeva O., Mijovic A., Hess D., Tatam E., Amrolia P., Chiesa R., et al. Single-donor granulocyte transfusions for improving the outcome of high-risk pediatric patients with known bacterial and fungal infections undergoing stem cell transplantation: a 10-year single-center experience. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50:846–849. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Gottlieb D.J., Clancy L.E., Withers B., McGuire H.M., Luciani F., Singh M., et al. Prophylactic antigen-specific T-cells targeting seven viral and fungal pathogens after allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplant. Clin Transl Immunol. 2021;10 doi: 10.1002/cti2.1249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311.Al-Akioui Sanz K., Echecopar Parente C., Ferreras C., Menéndez Ribes M., Navarro A., Mestre C., et al. Familial CD45RA– T cells to treat severe refractory infections in immunocompromised patients. Front Med. 2023;10 doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1083215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 312.Perruccio K., Tosti A., Burchielli E., Topini F., Ruggeri L., Carotti A., et al. Transferring functional immune responses to pathogens after haploidentical hematopoietic transplantation. Blood. 2005;106:4397–4406. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-1775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313.Al Shehri T., Gilmour K., Gothe F., Loughlin S., Bibi S., Rowan A.D., et al. Novel gain-of-function mutation in Stat1 sumoylation site leads to CMC/CID phenotype responsive to ruxolitinib. J Clin Immunol. 2019;39:776–785. doi: 10.1007/s10875-019-00687-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 314.Mercer D.K., Robertson J.C., Miller L., Stewart C.S., O’Neil D.A. NP213 (Novexatin®): a unique therapy candidate for onychomycosis with a differentiated safety and efficacy profile. Med Mycol. 2020;58:1064–1072. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myaa015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315.Mercer D.K., Stewart C.S., Miller L., Robertson J., Duncan V.M.S., O’Neil D.A. Improved methods for assessing therapeutic potential of antifungal agents against dermatophytes and their application in the development of NP213, a novel onychomycosis therapy candidate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02117-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 316.van der Does A.M., Bogaards S.J., Jonk L., Wulferink M., Velders M.P., Nibbering P.H. The human lactoferrin-derived peptide hLF1-11 primes monocytes for an enhanced TLR-mediated immune response. Biometals. 2010;23:493–505. doi: 10.1007/s10534-010-9322-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 317.Morici P., Fais R., Rizzato C., Tavanti A., Lupetti A. Inhibition of Candida albicans biofilm fformation by the synthetic lactoferricin derived peptide hLF1-11. PLoS One. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 318.Lupetti A., Paulusma-Annema A., Welling M.M., Dogterom-Ballering H., Brouwer C.P., Senesi S., et al. Synergistic activity of the N-terminal peptide of human lactoferrin and fluconazole against Candida species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:262–267. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.1.262-267.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 319.Lupetti A., Brouwer C.P., Bogaards S.J., Welling M.M., de Heer E., Campa M., et al. Human lactoferrin-derived peptide’s antifungal activities against disseminated Candida albicans infection. J Infect Dis. 2007;196:1416–1424. doi: 10.1086/522427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 320.Rothstein D.M., Spacciapoli P., Tran L.T., Xu T., Roberts F.D., Dalla Serra M., et al. Anticandida activity is retained in P-113, a 12-amino-acid fragment of histatin 5. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:1367–1373. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.5.1367-1373.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 321.Ji H.X., Zou Y.L., Duan J.J., Jia Z.R., Li X.J., Wang Z., et al. The synthetic melanocortin (CKPV)2 exerts anti-fungal and anti-inflammatory effects against Candida albicans vaginitis via inducing macrophage M2 polarization. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322.Catania A., Grieco P., Randazzo A., Novellino E., Gatti S., Rossi C., et al. Three-dimensional structure of the alpha-MSH-derived candidacidal peptide [Ac-CKPV]2. J Pept Res. 2005;66:19–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.2005.00265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 323.Cohen H., Wani N.A., Ben Hur D., Migliolo L., Cardoso M.H., Porat Z., et al. Interaction of pexiganan (MSI-78)-derived analogues reduces inflammation and TLR4-mediated cytokine secretion: a comparative study. ACS Omega. 2023;8:17856–17868. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 324.Lee D.K., Brender J.R., Sciacca M.F., Krishnamoorthy J., Yu C., Ramamoorthy A. Lipid composition-dependent membrane fragmentation and pore-forming mechanisms of membrane disruption by pexiganan (MSI-78) Biochemistry. 2013;52:3254–3263. doi: 10.1021/bi400087n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 325.Gottler L.M., Ramamoorthy A. Structure, membrane orientation, mechanism, and function of pexiganan—a highly potent antimicrobial peptide designed from magainin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1788:1680–1686. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 326.Zhou J., Lu X., He R., Du Y., Zeng B., Feng L., et al. Antifungal immunity: advances in PRR recognition, adaptive responses, and immune-based therapies. Sci China Life Sci. 2025 doi: 10.1007/s11427-024-2835-y. Available from: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 327.Casanova J.L., MacMicking J.D., Nathan C.F. Interferon-γ and infectious diseases: lessons and prospects. Science. 2024;384 doi: 10.1126/science.adl2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 328.Kak G., Raza M., Tiwari B.K. Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ): exploring its implications in infectious diseases. Biomol Concepts. 2018;9:64–79. doi: 10.1515/bmc-2018-0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 329.Netea M.G., Brouwer A.E., Hoogendoorn E.H., Van der Meer J.W., Koolen M., Verweij P.E., et al. Two patients with cryptococcal meningitis and idiopathic CD4 lymphopenia: defective cytokine production and reversal by recombinant interferon-gamma therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:e83–e87. doi: 10.1086/425121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 330.Ellis M., Watson R., McNabb A., Lukic M.L., Nork M. Massive intracerebral aspergillosis responding to combination high dose liposomal amphotericin B and cytokine therapy without surgery. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51:70–75. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-51-1-70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 331.Kelleher P., Goodsall A., Mulgirigama A., Kunst H., Henderson D.C., Wilson R., et al. Interferon-gamma therapy in two patients with progressive chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Eur Respir J. 2006;27:1307–1310. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00021705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 332.Chen Y.C., Yeh S.L. Catch the moment: multisensory enhancement of rapid visual events by sound. Exp Brain Res. 2009;198:209–219. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1831-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333.Mehta H.M., Malandra M., Corey S.J. G-CSF and GM-CSF in neutropenia. J Immunol. 2015;195:1341–1349. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 334.Bosinger S.E., Hosiawa K.A., Cameron M.J., Persad D., Ran L., Xu L., et al. Gene expression profiling of host response in models of acute HIV infection. J Immunol. 2004;173:6858–6863. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.11.6858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335.Roilides E., Walsh T.J., Pizzo P.A., Rubin M. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor enhances the phagocytic and bactericidal activity of normal and defective human neutrophils. J Infect Dis. 1991;163:579–583. doi: 10.1093/infdis/163.3.579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 336.Graybill J.R., Bocanegra R., Najvar L.K., Loebenberg D., Luther M.F. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and azole antifungal therapy in murine aspergillosis: role of immune suppression. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:2467–2473. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.10.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 337.Hazel D.L., Newland A.C., Kelsey S.M. Malignancy: granulocyte colony stimulating factor increases the efficacy of conventional amphotericin in the treatment of presumed deep-seated fungal infection in neutropenic patients following intensive chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation for haematological malignancies. Hematology. 1999;4:305–311. doi: 10.1080/10245332.1999.11746453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 338.Hamilton J.A. GM-CSF in inflammation. J Exp Med. 2020;217 doi: 10.1084/jem.20190945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 339.Chen G.H., Teitz-Tennenbaum S., Neal L.M., Murdock B.J., Malachowski A.N., Dils A.J., et al. Local GM-CSF-dependent differentiation and activation of pulmonary dendritic cells and macrophages protect against progressive cryptococcal lung infection in mice. J Immunol. 2016;196:1810–1821. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 340.Mills K.A.M., Westermann F., Espinosa V., Rosiek E., Desai J.V., Aufiero M.A., et al. GM-CSF-mediated epithelial–immune cell crosstalk orchestrates pulmonary immunity to Aspergillus fumigatus. bioRxiv. 2024 doi: 10.1101/2024.01.03.574062. Available from: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 341.Vitt C.R., Fidler J.M., Ando D., Zimmerman R.J., Aukerman S.L. Antifungal activity of recombinant human macrophage colony-stimulating factor in models of acute and chronic candidiasis in the rat. J Infect Dis. 1994;169:369–374. doi: 10.1093/infdis/169.2.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 342.Nassar F., Brummer E., Stevens D.A. Effect of in vivo macrophage colony-stimulating factor on fungistasis of bronchoalveolar and peritoneal macrophages against Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2162–2164. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.9.2162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 343.Li T., Qian C., Gu Y., Zhang J., Li S., Xia N. Current progress in the development of prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines. Sci China Life Sci. 2023;66:679–710. doi: 10.1007/s11427-022-2230-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 344.Schmidt C.S., White C.J., Ibrahim A.S., Filler S.G., Fu Y., Yeaman M.R., et al. NDV-3, a recombinant alum-adjuvanted vaccine for Candida and Staphylococcus aureus, is safe and immunogenic in healthy adults. Vaccine. 2012;30:7594–7600. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.10.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 345.Phan Q.T., Myers C.L., Fu Y., Sheppard D.C., Yeaman M.R., Welch W.H., et al. Als3 is a Candida albicans invasin that binds to cadherins and induces endocytosis by host cells. PLoS Biol. 2007;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 346.Spellberg B.J., Ibrahim A.S., Avanesian V., Fu Y., Myers C., Phan Q.T., et al. Efficacy of the anti-Candida rAls3p-N or rAls1p-N vaccines against disseminated and mucosal candidiasis. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:256–260. doi: 10.1086/504691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 347.De Bernardis F., Amacker M., Arancia S., Sandini S., Gremion C., Zurbriggen R., et al. A virosomal vaccine against candidal vaginitis: immunogenicity, efficacy and safety profile in animal models. Vaccine. 2012;30:4490–4498. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 348.Rayens E., Rabacal W., Willems H.M.E., Kirton G.M., Barber J.P., Mousa J.J., et al. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a pan-fungal vaccine in preclinical models of aspergillosis, candidiasis, and pneumocystosis. PNAS Nexus. 2022;1 doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 349.Singh S., Nabeela S., Barbarino A., Ibrahim A.S., Uppuluri P. Antibodies targeting Candida albicans Als3 and Hyr1 antigens protect neonatal mice from candidiasis. Front Immunol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.925821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 350.Kumar R., Srivastava V. Application of anti-fungal vaccines as a tool against emerging anti-fungal resistance. Front Fungal Biol. 2023;4 doi: 10.3389/ffunb.2023.1241539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 351.Loh J.T., Lam K.P. Fungal infections: immune defense, immunotherapies and vaccines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;196 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 352.Hao P., Li X., Li X., Zhong W. mRNA vaccine technology for infectious diseases and beyond. Sci China Life Sci. 2024;67:2267–2270. doi: 10.1007/s11427-024-2639-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 353.Sathongdejwisit P., Pruksaphon K., Intaramat A., Aiumurai P., Sookrung N., Ratanabanangkoon K., et al. A novel, inexpensive in-house immunochromatographic strip test for cryptococcosis based on the cryptococcal glucuronoxylomannan specific monoclonal antibody 18B7. Diagnostics. 2021;11:758. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 354.Larsen R.A., Pappas P.G., Perfect J., Aberg J.A., Casadevall A., Cloud G.A., et al. Phase I evaluation of the safety and pharmacokinetics of murine-derived anticryptococcal antibody 18B7 in subjects with treated cryptococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:952–958. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.3.952-958.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 355.Bugli F., Cacaci M., Martini C., Torelli R., Posteraro B., Sanguinetti M., et al. Human monoclonal antibody-based therapy in the treatment of invasive candidiasis. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/403121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 356.Di Mambro T., Vanzolini T., Bruscolini P., Perez-Gaviro S., Marra E., Roscilli G., et al. A new humanized antibody is effective against pathogenic fungi in vitro. Sci Rep. 2021;11 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98659-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 357.Vanzolini T., Di Mambro T., Magnani M., Menotta M. AFM evaluation of a humanized recombinant antibody affecting C. auris cell wall and stability. RSC Adv. 2023;13:6130–6142. doi: 10.1039/d2ra07217c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 358.De Bernardis F., Liu H., O’Mahony R., La Valle R., Bartollino S., Sandini S., et al. Human domain antibodies against virulence traits of Candida albicans inhibit fungus adherence to vaginal epithelium and protect against experimental vaginal candidiasis. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:149–157. doi: 10.1086/509891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 359.Lázár-Molnár E., Gácser A., Freeman G.J., Almo S.C., Nathenson S.G., Nosanchuk J.D. The PD-1/PD-L costimulatory pathway critically affects host resistance to the pathogenic fungus Histoplasma capsulatum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:2658–2663. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711918105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 360.Chang K.C., Burnham C.A., Compton S.M., Rasche D.P., Mazuski R.J., McDonough J.S., et al. Blockade of the negative co-stimulatory molecules PD-1 and CTLA-4 improves survival in primary and secondary fungal sepsis. Crit Care. 2013;17 doi: 10.1186/cc12711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 361.McGaha T., Murphy J.W. CTLA-4 down-regulates the protective anticryptococcal cell-mediated immune response. Infect Immun. 2000;68:4624–4630. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.8.4624-4630.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 362.Grimaldi D., Pradier O., Hotchkiss R.S., Vincent J.L. Nivolumab plus interferon-γ in the treatment of intractable mucormycosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:18. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30541-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 363.Zhao X., Guo Y., Jiang C., Chang Q., Zhang S., Luo T., et al. JNK1 negatively controls antifungal innate immunity by suppressing CD23 expression. Nat Med. 2017;23:337–346. doi: 10.1038/nm.4260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 364.Loh J.T., Teo J.K.H., Kannan S., Verma C.S., Lim H.H., Lam K.P. Disrupting the Dok3–Card9 interaction with synthetic peptides enhances antifungal effector functions of human neutrophils. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1780. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 365.Chen T., Feng Y., Sun W., Zhao G., Wu H., Cheng X., et al. The nucleotide receptor STING translocates to the phagosomes to negatively regulate anti-fungal immunity. Immunity. 2023;56:1727–1742. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.06.002. e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 366.Zhang Q., Liu F., Zeng M., Mao Y., Song Z. Drug repurposing strategies in the development of potential antifungal agents. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;105:5259–5279. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11407-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 367.Rossato L., Loreto É.S., Venturini T.P., Azevedo M.I., Weiblen C., Botton S.A., et al. In vitro interaction of antifungal and antibacterial drugs against Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii before and after capsular induction. Med Mycol. 2015;53:885–889. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myv059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 368.da Silva C.R., Silveira M., Soares G.C., de Andrade C.R., Cabral V.P.F., Sá L., et al. Analysis of possible pathways on the mechanism of action of minocycline and doxycycline against strains of Candida spp. resistant to fluconazole. J Med Microbiol. 2023;72 doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001759. Available from: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 369.Lew M.A., Beckett K.M., Levin M.J. Antifungal activity of four tetracycline analogues against Candida albicans in vitro: potentiation by amphotericin B. J Infect Dis. 1977;136:263–270. doi: 10.1093/infdis/136.2.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 370.Shi W., Chen Z., Chen X., Cao L., Liu P., Sun S. The combination of minocycline and fluconazole causes synergistic growth inhibition against Candida albicans: an in vitro interaction of antifungal and antibacterial agents. FEMS Yeast Res. 2010;10:885–893. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00664.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 371.Loreto E.S., Tondolo J.S., Pilotto M.B., Alves S.H., Santurio J.M. New insights into the in vitro susceptibility of Pythium insidiosum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:7534–7537. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02680-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 372.Gao L., Sun Y., Yuan M., Li M., Zeng T. In vitro and in vivo study on the synergistic effect of minocycline and azoles against pathogenic fungi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00290-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 373.Kadota J., Sakito O., Kohno S., Sawa H., Mukae H., Oda H., et al. A mechanism of erythromycin treatment in patients with diffuse panbronchiolitis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147:153–159. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.1.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 374.Sunazuka T., Yoshida K., Oohori M., Otoguro K., Harigaya Y., Iwai Y., et al. Effect of 14-membered macrolide compounds on monocyte to macrophage differentiation. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2003;56:721–724. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.56.721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 375.Iwanaga N., Nakamura S., Oshima K., Kajihara T., Takazono T., Miyazaki T., et al. Macrolides promote CCL2-mediated macrophage recruitment and clearance of nasopharyngeal pneumococcal colonization in mice. J Infect Dis. 2015;212:1150–1159. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 376.Nakamura S., Ikeda-Dantsuji Y., Jin L., Higashi Y., Abe M., Inukai T., et al. Macrolides inhibit capsule formation of highly virulent Cryptococcus gattii and promote innate immune susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02364-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 377.Dalhoff A. Antiviral, antifungal, and antiparasitic activities of fluoroquinolones optimized for treatment of bacterial infections: a puzzling paradox or a logical consequence of their mode of action?. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34:661–668. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2296-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 378.Harrison T.S., Griffin G.E., Levitz S.M. Conditional lethality of the diprotic weak bases chloroquine and quinacrine against Cryptococcus neoformans. J Infect Dis. 2000;182:283–289. doi: 10.1086/315649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 379.Ozdek S.C., Miller D., Flynn P.M., Flynn H.W. In vitro antifungal activity of the fourth generation fluoroquinolones against Candida isolates from human ocular infections. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2006;14:347–351. doi: 10.1080/09273940600976953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 380.Stergiopoulou T., Meletiadis J., Sein T., Papaioannidou P., Tsiouris I., Roilides E., et al. Comparative pharmacodynamic interaction analysis between ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin and antifungal agents against Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63:343–348. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 381.Stergiopoulou T., Meletiadis J., Sein T., Papaioannidou P., Tsiouris I., Roilides E., et al. Isobolographic analysis of pharmacodynamic interactions between antifungal agents and ciprofloxacin against Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:2196–2204. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00735-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 382.Deren Y.T., Ozdek S., Kalkanci A., Akyürek N., Hasanreisoğlu B. Comparison of antifungal efficacies of moxifloxacin, liposomal amphotericin B, and combination treatment in experimental Candida albicans endophthalmitis in rabbits. Can J Microbiol. 2010;56:1–7. doi: 10.1139/w09-112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 383.Brilhante R.S., Caetano E.P., Sidrim J.J., Cordeiro R.A., Camargo Z.P., Fechine M.A., et al. Ciprofloxacin shows synergism with classical antifungals against Histoplasma capsulatum var. capsulatum and Coccidioides posadasii. Mycoses. 2013;56:397–401. doi: 10.1111/myc.12025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 384.Stergiopoulou T., Meletiadis J., Sein T., Papaioannidou P., Walsh T.J., Roilides E. Synergistic interaction of the triple combination of amphotericin B, ciprofloxacin, and polymorphonuclear neutrophils against Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:5923–5929. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00548-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 385.Shen L.L., Baranowski J., Fostel J., Montgomery D.A., Lartey P.A. DNA topoisomerases from pathogenic fungi: targets for the discovery of antifungal drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:2778–2784. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.12.2778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 386.Elsea S.H., Osheroff N., Nitiss J.L. Cytotoxicity of quinolones toward eukaryotic cells. Identification of topoisomerase II as the primary cellular target for the quinolone CP-115,953 in yeast. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:13150–13153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 387.Hsiung Y., Elsea S.H., Osheroff N., Nitiss J.L. A mutation in yeast TOP2 homologous to a quinolone-resistant mutation in bacteria. Mutation of the amino acid homologous to Ser83 of Escherichia coli gyrA alters sensitivity to eukaryotic topoisomerase inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:20359–20364. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.35.20359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 388.Dong J., Walker J., Nitiss J.L. A mutation in yeast topoisomerase II that confers hypersensitivity to multiple classes of topoisomerase II poisons. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:7980–7987. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.11.7980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 389.Strumberg D., Nitiss J.L., Rose A., Nicklaus M.C., Pommier Y. Mutation of a conserved serine residue in a quinolone-resistant type II topoisomerase alters the enzyme–DNA and drug interactions. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:7292–7301. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.11.7292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 390.Baxter B.K., DiDone L., Ogu D., Schor S., Krysan D.J. Identification, in vitro activity and mode of action of phosphoinositide-dependent-1 kinase inhibitors as antifungal molecules. ACS Chem Biol. 2011;6:502–510. doi: 10.1021/cb100399x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 391.Koselny K., Green J., DiDone L., Halterman J.P., Fothergill A.W., Wiederhold N.P., et al. The celecoxib derivative AR-12 has broad-spectrum antifungal activity in vitro and improves the activity of fluconazole in a murine model of Cryptococcosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:7115–7127. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01061-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 392.Perfect J.R. The antifungal pipeline: a reality check. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:603–616. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 393.Mullarky E., Lucki N.C., Beheshti Zavareh R., Anglin J.L., Gomes A.P., Nicolay B.N., et al. Identification of a small molecule inhibitor of 3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase to target serine biosynthesis in cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:1778–1783. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521548113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 394.Arbon D., Ženíšková K., Šubrtová K., Mach J., Štursa J., Machado M., et al. Repurposing of MitoTam: novel anti-cancer drug candidate exhibits potent activity against major protozoan and fungal pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66 doi: 10.1128/aac.00727-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 395.Bielcikova Z., Werner L., Stursa J., Cerny V., Krizova L., Spacek J., et al. Mitochondrially targeted tamoxifen as anticancer therapy: case series of patients with renal cell carcinoma treated in a phase I/Ib clinical trial. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023;15 doi: 10.1177/17588359231197957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 396.Dong L., Gopalan V., Holland O., Neuzil J. Mitocans revisited: mitochondrial targeting as efficient anti-cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:7941. doi: 10.3390/ijms21217941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 397.Neuzil J., Rohlena J., Werner L., Bielcikova Z. MitoTam-01 trial: mitochondrial targeting as plausible approach to cancer therapy. Comment on Yap et al. Complex I inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation in advanced solid tumors and acute myeloid leukemia: phase I trials. Nat Med 2023, 29, 115-126. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:4476. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 398.Jiao Y., Niu L.N., Ma S., Li J., Tay F.R., Chen J.H. Quaternary ammonium-based biomedical materials: state-of-the-art, toxicological aspects and antimicrobial resistance. Prog Polym Sci. 2017;71:53–90. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 399.Gong S.Q., Epasinghe J., Rueggeberg F.A., Niu L.N., Mettenberg D., Yiu C.K., et al. An ORMOSIL-containing orthodontic acrylic resin with concomitant improvements in antimicrobial and fracture toughness properties. PLoS One. 2012;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 400.Gong S.Q., Niu L.N., Kemp L.K., Yiu C.K., Ryou H., Qi Y.P., et al. Quaternary ammonium silane-functionalized, methacrylate resin composition with antimicrobial activities and self-repair potential. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:3270–3282. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 401.Gong S.Q., Huang Z.B., Shi W., Ma B., Tay F.R., Zhou B. In vitro evaluation of antibacterial effect of AH Plus incorporated with quaternary ammonium epoxy silicate against Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2014;40:1611–1615. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 402.Barros J., Silva M.G., Rôças I.N., Gonçalves L.S., Alves F.F., Lopes M.A., et al. Antibiofilm effects of endodontic sealers containing quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles. J Endod. 2014;40:1167–1171. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 403.Kesler Shvero D., Abramovitz I., Zaltsman N., Perez Davidi M., Weiss E.I., Beyth N. Towards antibacterial endodontic sealers using quaternary ammonium nanoparticles. Int Endod J. 2013;46:747–754. doi: 10.1111/iej.12054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 404.Gulve N., Kimmerling K., Johnston A.D., Krueger G.R., Ablashi D.V., Prusty B.K. Anti-herpesviral effects of a novel broad range anti-microbial quaternary ammonium silane, K21. Antivir Res. 2016;131:166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 405.Tweedy J.G., Prusty B.K., Gompels U.A. Use of whole genome deep sequencing to define emerging minority variants in virus envelope genes in herpesvirus treated with novel antimicrobial K21. Antivir Res. 2017;146:201–204. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 406.John C.N., Abrantes P., Prusty B.K., Ablashi D.V., Africa C.W.J. K21 compound, a potent antifungal agent: implications for the treatment of fluconazole-resistant HIV-associated Candida species. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1021. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 407.Yousfi H., Cassagne C., Ranque S., Rolain J.M., Bittar F. Repurposing of ribavirin as an adjunct therapy against invasive Candida Strains in an in vitro study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00263-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 408.Zhang M., Yan H., Lu M., Wang D., Sun S. Antifungal activity of ribavirin used alone or in combination with fluconazole against Candida albicans is mediated by reduced virulence. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





