Skip to main content
. 2002 Aug;68(8):3965–3968. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.8.3965-3968.2002

TABLE 2.

Adsorption of viruses to DEAE-Sepharosea

Virus Slopeb Correlation (r) Adsorption groupc
MS2 −170 ± 26 A 0.88 I
E1 −160 ± 17 A 0.87 I
φX174 −130 ± 26 AB 0.71 I
CB4 −115 ± 22 B 0.82
T3 −110 ± 21 B 0.81
T7 −110 ± 21 B 0.81
CB5 −105 ± 15 B 0.89
E4 −100 ± 19 B 0.82
f2 −95 ± 15 BC 0.87
P1 −65 ± 20 C 0.80 II
T4 −65 ± 10 C 0.88 II
T2 −30 ± 4 D 0.91 II
E5 −6 ± 8 E 0.08
a

The amount of virus adsorbed as the ionic strength of the solution was increased was determined and plotted as a percentage of the number of viruses in the portion of the solution that was not mixed with DEAE-Sepharose.

b

The slope was determined by dividing the percentage of virus adsorbed by the ionic strength of the solution. The values are means ± standard deviations for triplicate determinations. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at a P value of >0.05. The weakest electrostatic interaction is represented by the slope of −170 ± 26 (MS2), and the strongest electrostatic interaction is represented by the slope of −6 ± 8 (E5).

c

Virus groups described by Gerba and Goyal (10).