Table 1.
Study characteristics were listed.
| Author, year | Country | Study design | Comparison | Size | Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bakker 2012[10] | Netherlands | RCT | EU | 10 | 64 (46–72) |
| DVS | 10 | 62 (58–70) | |||
| Bang 2019[11] | USA | RCT | EU | 34 | 52.9 ± 14.2 |
| EVU | 32 | 55.6 ± 14.2 | |||
| Boxhoorn 2021[12] | Netherlands | RCT | ED | 55 | 60 ± 14 |
| DD | 49 | 59 ± 11 | |||
| He 2019[13] | China | RCT | ED | 41 | 53 (41–62) |
| EDL | 39 | 48 (38–61) | |||
| Ke 2021[14] | China | RCT | ED | 15 | 38 ± 18 |
| DD | 15 | 40 ± 16 | |||
| Kivilaakso 1984[15] | Finland | RCT | ELL | 17 | 39.7 ± 10 |
| EOS | 18 | 38.4 ± 10.2 | |||
| Kohli 2019[16] | India | RCT | ED | 32 | 41.6 ± 14.8 |
| EDL | 28 | 37.4 ± 12.9 | |||
| Litvin A 2010[17] | Belarus | RCT | DSU | 37 | NA |
| EOS | 35 | NA | |||
| Maroske 1982[18] | Germany | RCT | EDL | 12 | 48 (23-73) |
| EOS | 12 | 46 (21-67) | |||
| Mier 1997[19] | Mexico | RCT | EOS | 25 | 42 ± 16 |
| DOS | 11 | 42 ± 12 | |||
| Schröder 1991[20] | Finland | RCT | ELL | 10 | 40.5 ± 7.5 |
| EOS | 11 | 35.7 ± 6.8 | |||
| Shenvi 2016[21] | USA | RCT | DSU | 11 | 37.3 ± 13 |
| EDL | 24 | 41.7 ± 13.8 | |||
| van Brunschot 2018[22] | Netherlands | RCT | EU | 51 | 63 ± 14 |
| DSU | 47 | 60 ± 11 | |||
| van Santvoort 2010[9] | Netherlands | RCT | DSU | 43 | 57.6 ± 2.1 |
| DOS | 45 | 57.4 ± 2.0 | |||
| Van Veldhuisen 2024[23] | Netherlands | RCT | ED | 47 | NA |
| DD | 41 | NA |
DD = delayed drainage, DED = delayed endoscopic debridement, DOS = delayed open surgery, DVS = Delayed video-assisted Surgery, ED = early drainage, EDL = early Drainage + Lavage, EED = early endoscopic debridement, ELL = early laparotomy lavage, EOS = early open surgery, EVS = early video-assisted surgery, NA = not available, RCT = randomized controlled trial.