Skip to main content
Patient Safety in Surgery logoLink to Patient Safety in Surgery
. 2025 Sep 2;19:24. doi: 10.1186/s13037-025-00449-9

Predictors of early arteriovenous fistula failure in patients with end stage renal disease on hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Solafa S M Salih 1, Khalid O Mohamed 2, Abdalla O O Mohamedali 3, Ahmed A O Mahmoud 3, Duaa A S Ibrahim 4, Khadeja F Abdallah 5, Mohamed S K Salih 6, Aseel E B Abdhameed 1, Nehal S A Salih 2, Khalid S K Salih 7, Samia I E Mursal 4, Ahmed S E E Abdelrahman 8, Ayoub A B Mohamed 9, Yusra E A Elmobashir 10, Amgad I A Mohamed 11, Sagad O O Mohamed 1,
PMCID: PMC12403630  PMID: 40898218

Abstract

Background

Hemodialysis is the most prevalent modality of renal replacement therapy. The durability of hemodialysis and its quality depend on consistent and reliable access to the patient’s vascular system. In this systematic review we provide a comprehensive analysis of the predictors of primary arteriovenous fistula failure.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and the WHO Virtual Health Library Regional Portal from database inception through March 2025. Search terms included combinations of ‘arteriovenous fistula’, ‘failure’, ‘hemodialysis’, ‘end-stage renal disease’, and ‘risk factors’. Four reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, with full texts assessed according to predefined inclusion criteria. Studies were eligible if they examined risk factors for primary arteriovenous fistula failure in adult patients on hemodialysis.

Results

A total of 38 studies were included in the systematic review. Early arteriovenous fistula failure was significantly associated with a distal location of the fistula, small arterial diameter, small vein diameter, low serum albumin level, female gender, diabetes mellitus, and decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

Conclusion

This systematic review identified several key risk factors for early arteriovenous fistula failure in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis. These factors should be considered from a patient safety perspective and included in the shared decision-making process with patients who are candidates for arteriovenous fistula surgery. Optimizing these factors may enhance fistula maturation and reduce the need for repeat vascular access procedures. However, recognizing that some risk factors may not be readily modifiable in ESRD patients, clinicians should balance optimization efforts with the urgency of establishing vascular access.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13037-025-00449-9.

Keywords: Arteriovenous fistula, Primary failure, Hemodialysis, ESRD, Chronic kidney disease, Predictors

Background

Recent data indicate that about 2.5 million people worldwide have chronic renal failure, and around 80% depend on hemodialysis as their primary renal replacement therapy [1]. Data from Europe show that more than half a million patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) rely on hemodialysis, and by 2030, this number is expected to increase by more than 50% [1]. For delivering and maintaining adequate hemodialysis for ESRD patients, a well-functioning vascular access is crucial [1, 2].

A native arteriovenous fistula is the optimal vascular access, allowing connection between the patient’s blood and the hemodialysis machine, compared to central venous catheters [13]. arteriovenous fistula offers longer durability and fewer complications than central venous catheters or arteriovenous grafts [2]. An arteriovenous fistula is created by anastomosing a vein to an artery, facilitating dilatation and arterialization of the vein (maturation) and making it suitable for needle insertion during hemodialysis. This anastomosis leads to arterialization of the vein (thickening of its wall) and increase in his diameter making it suitable for future canulation for the purpose of hemodialysis. It can be created in the upper limb (distally or proximally) and, rarely, in the lower limbs [2].

Normally, arteriovenous fistula maturation process takes few weeks. However, arteriovenous fistula maturation does not occur in some cases. Studies attributed non-maturation to various factors, such as venous stenosis due to neointimal hyperplasia, surgical errors, and patient-related factors like hypotension and peripheral arterial disease [4, 5]. Unfortunately, arteriovenous fistula have a primary failure rate of 20–50% [6]. Studies estimate that $1–3 billion is spent annually managing failing or dysfunctional vascular access [7], highlighting the importance of identifying risk factors for primary failure to guide interventions.

In this systematic review, we aimed to identify factors contributing to arteriovenous fistula on-maturation in ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis and provide recommendations for future research to improve patient outcomes.

Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed reporting of this systematic review [8]. The review protocol was previously registered on the Open Science Framework platform (https://osf.io/7ys32/). All available literature were systematically searched through March 2025.

We aimed to identify significant factors associated with primary arteriovenous fistula failure (non-maturation or dysfunction). Databases searched included PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and the WHO Virtual Health Library Regional Portal. The keywords used were (Arteriovenous Fistula*) AND (primary failure OR early failure OR dysfunction OR Immaturity OR immature OR maturation OR poor maturation) AND (hemodialysis OR ESRD OR end stage renal disease OR renal failure OR chronic kidney disease) AND (risk factor* OR predict* factor* OR related factor OR factor* OR predict* OR associate* factor OR risk*). The initial screening of titles and abstracts was done by uploading relevant articles to Endnote software, with duplicates removed.

All cross-sectional, cohort or case control studies that reported sufficient data on factors associated with primary arteriovenous fistula failure. We excluded studies reporting data on failure and complications associated with central venous catheters, abstracts, letters, reviews, case reports, non-English articles, and studies without sufficient data of interest. The selection process was firstly done by initial screening with titles and abstracts of all identified articles for identifying relevant articles. Then, a comprehensive full-text review was done based on the inclusion criteria.

Critical appraisal checklist provided by “Joanna Biggs Institute” was used for evaluation (http://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools). These tools assess for possibility of bias in the study design, conduct, and analysis of data. Three independent reviewers extracted relevant data from each article. Inconsistency and discrepancies between reviewers were resolved via discussion and agreement.

We summarized data on all potential risk factors that were identified across the included studies. In addition, quantitative meta-analyses were conducted for factors that were presented in studies reporting comparable quantitative effect estimates suitable for pooling. Other factors that were reported infrequently or lacking suitable quantitative data for meta-analysis were summarized qualitatively. The extracted data included: authors, year of publication, country, age groups, number of patients, patients’ characteristics, methods used for determining of primary arteriovenous fistula failure, and associated factors with primary arteriovenous fistula failure.

Statistical analyses were carried out by calculating the pooled odd ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to assess associations with primary arteriovenous fistula failure. To compensate for heterogeneity between studies, random effect model was used. The I2 statistic test was used to evaluate heterogeneity among studies, which quantifies the percentage of variation in effect estimates attributable to heterogeneity rather than chance ( [9, 10]). Publication bias was assessed using Begg’s and Egger’s tests ( [9, 10]). The Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill method was applied to account for potentially missing studies when there is evidence of a publication bias [11]. The significance level for both tests was set at 0.05. The analyses were conducted using the meta package in R version 4.4.3.

Results

Initial search revealed a total of 2349 records. after removal of duplicates, 1760 studies were submitted for tittle and abstract screening. Of which, 1722 were excluded due to irrelevance. Following full text assessment, a total of 38 studies met the eligibility criteria and were submitted for synthesis of evidence [1249]. The schematic flow of studies identification and selection were illustrated in Fig. 1. The studies were conducted across diverse geographic regions, including Europe, Asia, North America, and Africa. All of the included studies were conducted on adult populations, with mean or median participant ages ranging from the fourth to seventh decades of life (Table 1). Commonly used methods to define the outcome included absence of thrill or bruit, failure of successful needle cannulation, or inadequate blood flow for dialysis. Most studies assessed functional usability of the fistula within a period of 1 to 3 months post-creation (Table 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flow chart for studies selection process

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the included studies

Study Country Age group Total No. of patients Patients with primary AVF failure Quality assessment
Abreu et al. 2018 Portugal 69 ± 18 years 117 23 9/11
Abreu et al. 2022 Portugal Median of 71 years 155 15 6/9
Ahmadi et al. 2022 Iran 52.82 ± 16.94 years 400 30 6/8
Akin et al. 2016 Turkey 55.90 ± 17.5 years 119 27 9/11
Aitken et al. 2014 UK 60.5 ± 0.9 569 163 9/11
Anh et al. 2022 Taiwan > 20 years 952 232 10/10
Bahadi et al. 2012 Morocco 49.28 ± 17.32 years 115 33 9/11
Bashar et al. 2015 Ireland 60.9 ± 16.9 86 52 10/10
Bhuwania et al. 2024 India 58.17 ± 13.42 91 41 10/10
Bojakowski et al. 2012 Poland 62 ± 15 68 11 10/11
Bosanquet et al. 2015 UK Median of 72 years 247 52 9/11
De Winter et al. 2024 Netherlands 63.5612.4 years 55 14 9/11
Ernandez et al. 2005 Switzerland 60.28 ± 14.8 years 119 34 8/8
Eslami et al. 2016 United States 63.8 ± 14.0 years 376 66 7/9
Farber et al. 2016 United States 55.1 ± 13.4 years​ 602 32 10/10
Feldman et al. 2003 United States 56 ± 17 years 348 120 7/9
Fila et al. 2014 Croatia 64.1 years ± 12.8 93 15 7/9
Genek et al. 2015 Turkey 68.5 ± 14.9 years 30 14 5/9
Gao et al. 2016 China. 58.97 ± 15.27 years 98 32 9/10
Ghosh et al. 2022 India 40.7 ± 13.08 205 55 9/11
Huijbregts et al. 2007 Netherlands 65 ± 14 395 131 11/11
Hod et al. 2014 United States 76.2 ± 6.02 20,360 4,579 11/11
Kim et al. 2001 South Korea 53 ± 14 years 53 10 9/11
Kim MH et al. 2015 South Korea 58.5 ± 13.9years 134 30 9/11
Kim JK et al. 2015 South Korea 62.1 ± 13.3 years 252 100 9/10
Martinez-mier et al. 2019 Mexico 36.3 ± 12.9 years 78 19 8/11
Mayer et al. 2016 Germany. 50 ± 87 years 41 6 10/11
Ozhan et al. 2020 Turkey 58.2 ± 13.8 years 122 34 7/10
Pandey et al. 2019 India 44.95 ± 11.7 years 224 62 9/11
Park et al. 2015 South Korea 55.86 ± 15.2 years 371 22 9/11
Pratama et al. 2023 Indonesia 53.2 ± 11.8 years 83 33 10/11
Ramanan et al. 2022 India 53.10 ± 14.54 years 460 90 7/9
Sari et al. 2018 Turkey 51.1 ± 15.4 years 36 10 7/9
Saucy et al. 2009 Switzerland 63 ± 14.3 years 58 12 8/10
Tubail et al. 2024 France Median of 68 years 105 63 10/10
Wongmahisorn et al. 2019 Thailand 61.2 +_14.5 years 396 121 10/11
Yan et al. 2018 China 50.88 ± 15 1051 41 8/11
Zadeh et al. 2008 Iran Median of 60 years 100 23 8/11

Table 2.

Summary of the main resuls

Study Outcome definition Factors associated with the outcome
Abreu et al. 2018 Thrombosis within one month of vascular access creation Older age, vein diameter, and peak systolic velocity of radial and ulnar arteries.
Abreu et al. 2022 Lack of vein diameter > 4 mm, depth < 6 mm, and blood flow > 500 mL/min Pulsatility index, peak systolic velocity, blood flow, and resistance index.
Ahmadi et al. 2022 Lack of thrill on the palpation or vascular murmur in the AVF examination within one month Low BMI and weight
Akin et al. 2016 Lack of successful cannulation with two fistula needles with a blood flow of 250 mL/min for at least one complete dialysis session, after 4 weeks Presence of thrill, amount of daily proteinuria, insulin levels, Homa-IR (Insulin Resistance evaluated by homeostasis model assessment), and serum albumin level.
Anh et al. 2022 Failure of AVF to be provided with prescribed HD consistently with two-needle insertion for at least two-thirds of HD sessions in four consecutive weeks High doses and long-term use of contact laxatives, advanced age, diabetes, and use of contact laxative in combined with certain medications (e.g., erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers) were associated with increased failure risks.
Aitken et al. 2014 Lack of thrill, bruit, or adequate maturation to permit needle cannulation Uremia was associated with Early AVF Failure
Bahadi et al. 2012 primary non-function due to thrombosis (before puncturing) or non-maturation Diabetes and distal site of creation of AVF.
Bashar et al. 2015 Use of AVF at least six successive occasions for hemodialysis. Female gender
Bhuwania et al. 2024 Inability to use AVF for dialysis or non-maturity at 6 weeks Male sex and less diabetes associated with a matured RC-AVF outcome. Preoperative vascular evaluation and artery and vein diameter is associated with poor AVF maturation, calcification of feeding artery and poor vein increment have prominent role in deciding maturation
Bojakowski et al. 2012 Failure of AVF to mature or thrombosis or stenosis within 2 months High inflammatory markers
Bosanquet et al. 2015 Loss of AVF patency within 6 weeks Ipsilateral CVC access, Age > 73 years, anastomosing Vein diameter < 2.2 mm, previous lower limb Angioplasty for peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and absent intra-operative Thrill .
De Winter et al. 2024 Lack of venous diameter of 4 mm with a blood flow of 500 mL/min, an easily compressible vein, an audible bruit, a palpable thrill, and an adequate venous length and depth for receiving two separate needles for hemodialysis within 12 weeks. Interaoperative blood flow equal or lower than the determined cutoff point of 160 ml\min
Ernandez et al. 2005 Non-functioning AVF (thrombosis or absence of fistula maturation) within 6 months of creation Distal location, female gender, diabetes mellitus, and limited surgical expertise.
Eslami et al. 2016 Loss of patency or lack of maturation within 3 months post operation. COPD, AVF site on radial artery and cephalic vein, and smaller mean diameters of both inflow artery
Farber et al. 2016 Early thrombosis diagnosed by physical exam or ultrasound within 18 days of AVF creation.

Female gender, forearm AVF, smaller arterial size, draining vein diameter of 2–3 mm, and protamine use,

Surgeon experience

Feldman et al. 2003 Use of AVF at least six successive occasions for hemodialysis. History of hypertension, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery; cerebrovascular events, thrombophlebitis or pulmonary embolism, dialysis dependence at the time of surgery (reduced odds of maturation), mean arterial pressure < 85 mmHg (associated with 48% reduction in odds of success), high intraoperative heparin doses, vein diameter, and side-to-side anastomosis.
Fila et al. 2014 AVF that thrombosed before the first cannulation or did not reach functional status. Immediate failure was defined as failed AVF function within the first 24 h. Early patency or failure was defined by thrill and/or bruit 4 weeks post-surgery. BMI, vein diameter, and artery diameter
Genek et al. 2015 Absence of thrill and bruit by physical examination at 30 days postoperatively.​

Higher radial artery and brachial artery resistive index (RI) and lower peak systolic flow rate in failed fistulas.

Older age and female gender, the narrower brachial artery diameter were associated with failure.​ The brachial artery peak systolic flow rate was significantly reduced in patients in the radio cephalic fistula group that developed early and late-term failure.

Gao et al. 2016 Absence of thrill and bruit by examination at 4–6 week.​ Cephalic vein and radial artery small diameter, preoperative blood pressure and PTH .
Ghosh et al. 2022 Use of AVF at least six successive occasions for hemodialysis. Patient’s BMI and presence of diabetes had significant impact on outcome thrill was significantly associated with successful maturation,
Huijbregts et al. 2007 insufficient access flow to maintaining dialysis at 6 weeks after surgery Female gender, renal replacement therapy prior AVF creation, the center of access creation, AVF site at wrist, diabetes .
Hod et al. 2014 Inability to use AVF at the dialysis initiation Older age, female gender, black race, history of diabetes, cardiac failure, and shorter duration of ESRD show similar finding of entire cohort pre hemodialysis initiation, but in elderly hemodialysis population there is association between all this variable and pre dialysis AVF failure
Kim et al. 2001 having a complete obstruction of blood flow or a severe stenosis requiring radiologic intervention or surgical correction within 4 months. Low access blood flow, small vein diameter, and diabetes mellitus .
Kim MH et al. 2015 Failure of two-point needling hemodialysis using the AVF between 6 weeks and 3 months post creation Female gender, previous history of AVF, and the deference between the pre and postdilation diameter equal or less than 2.2 mm.
Kim JK et al. 2015 Failure to use the AVF successfully by 3 months after its creation. Older age, female gender, obesity and low intraoperative blood flow, history of cardiovascular disease, low serum albumin level and high CRP level.
Martinez-mier et al. 2019 AVF that cannot be used with two-needle cannulation for two-thirds or more of all dialysis runs for 1 month delivering dialysis Radiocephalic AVF, short prothrombin time, low serum albumin and AVF site on the same side of HD catheter .
Mayer et al. 2016 Lack of a progressive remodeling of the vein, readineas for two-needle cannulation with minimum risk of damage, and flow > 400mL/min with the US assessment within 6 weeks The vessel diameter and the distensibility of the vein also appear to play an important role in successful maturation of an AVF.
Ozhan et al. 2020 Lack of an easily compressible vein, continuous audible bruit, and palpable thrill, at least 6 mm internal diameter, maximal 6 mm depth from the skin to the outflow vein, and flow > 600mL/min with the US assessment within 6 weeks Older age and small artery diameter
Pandey et al. 2019 Failure to achieve vascular access from the fistula within first 4 months of its creation. Age and brachial artery diameter
Park et al. 2015 Fistula that was not ready to use based on physical examination and US assessment within 3 months. Small vessels diameter, diabetes, BMI, CHF.
Pratama et al. 2023 Lack of blood flow > 600 ml/min, vein depth < 0.6 cm, and a diameter > 0.6 cm within 6 weeks. Low intraoperative brachial artery blood flow rate and peak systolic velocity in brachiocephalic AVF .
Ramanan et al. 2022

Primary outcomes were immediate failure defined as an AVF that has either no appearance of or loss of bruit or thrill within 72 h of creation and primary failure defined as an AVF that was inadequate for hemodialysis at 3 months’ post creation, including immediate failure, failure

to mature or early thrombosis

younger age and feeding artery diameter < 2.0 mm associated with higher specificity for failure.
Sari et al. 2018 Thrombus formation, absence of thrill or maturation failure within 6 weeks Female gender, absence of thrill post-operation, poor vein quality, smaller cephalic vein diameter at the Brescia-Cimino region, the RI of the radial artery in the snuff box region first decreased and thereafter increased, while the peak systolic velocity and end-diastolic velocity of the cephalic vein in the snuff box region first increased and thereafter decreased. CRP, ESR, and prothrombin values was found to be higher in the group with dysfunctional fistula.
Saucy et al. 2009 Inability to use the fistula for dialysis with two needles within the first 3months. Intraoperative blood flow < 120mL
Tubail et al. 2024 Having thrombosis, stenosis, < 500 ml/min blood flow, < 5 mm vein diameter, or ≥ 6 mm deep vein within 4 months post-surgery Low vein-distensibility
Wongmahisorn et al. 2019 AVF was not successfully cannulated or could not be used for hemodialysis within 3 months post-surgery High preoperative and postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios, low BMI, low blood pressure and low rate of AVF creation
Yan et al. 2018 Lack of thrill on palpation and a low-pitched noise on auscultation of the anastomosis within 7 days of surgery Cephalic vein diameter and preoperative MAP
Zadeh et al. 2008 n/a Hb < 8 g/dL, diabetes, and age > 60 years were identified as predictive factors for AVF failure and ACE inhibitor intake was found to be protective.

A broad range of predictors were assessed for association with primary arteriovenous fistula failure. The factors included patient-related characteristics (female gender, diabetes mellitus, low body mass index (BMI), and hypoalbuminemia), vascular factors (smaller arterial and venous diameters, low intraoperative blood flow, poor vein distensibility, the absence of an intraoperative thrill or bruit, use of distal arteriovenous fistula sites, and low peak systolic velocities), and several inflammatory markers such as elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and low hemoglobin levels (Table 2).

Meta-analysis of 12 studies revealed that both smaller vein diameter (SMD = − 0.429, 95% CI: -0.534 to -0.323; p < .001) and smaller artery diameter (SMD = -0.427, 95% CI: -0.573 to -0.282; p < .001) were significantly associated with increased risk of primary arteriovenous fistula failure. Additionally, intraoperative AFV blood flow was significantly lower in arteriovenous fistula failure group (SMD = -0.729, 95% CI: -1.181 to -0.277; p = .002) (Figs. 2, 3 and 4).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Forest plot for the association between vein diameter and primary arteriovenous fistula failure

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Forest plot for the association between artery diameter and primary arteriovenous fistula failure

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Forest plot for the association between arteriovenous fistula blood flow and primary arteriovenous fistula failure

Lower serum albumin levels were significantly associated with arteriovenous fistula failure (SMD = -0.423, 95% CI: -0.733 to -0.113; p = .007; I² = 69.34%). However, body mass index (BMI) was not significantly related to arteriovenous fistula failure (SMD = 0.044, 95% CI: -0.136 to 0.226; p = .628) (Figs. 5 and 6).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Forest plot for the association between serum albumin levels and primary arteriovenous fistula failure

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Forest plot for the association between body mass index (BMI) and primary arteriovenous fistula failure

Regarding blood pressure, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were inversely associated with arteriovenous fistula success. Mete-analysis of seven studies revealed that low levels of systolic blood pressures (SBP) were associated with significant higher risk for primary arteriovenous fistula failure (SMD = -0.346, 95% CI: -0.651 to -0.040; p = .026). Similarly, meta-analysis of seven studies revealed that low levels of diastolic blood pressures (DBP) were associated with significantly higher risk for primary arteriovenous fistula failure (SMD = -0.30, 95% CI: -0.565 to -0.003; P = .031) (Figs. 7 and 8).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Forest plot for the association between systolic blood pressure and primary arteriovenous fistula failure

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Forest plot for the association between diastolic blood pressure and primary arteriovenous fistula failure

Female gender (OR = 1.423, 95% CI: 1.199 to 1.687; p < .001) and diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.314, 95% CI: 1.079 to 1.600; p = .006) were significantly associated with increased odds of primary arteriovenous fistula failure. Likewise, distal arteriovenous fistula location was predictive of primary arteriovenous fistula failure (OR = 1.795, 95% CI: 1.305 to 2.468; p < .001). In contrast, smoking was not significantly associated with primary arteriovenous fistula failure (OR = 1.038, 95% CI: 0.914 to 1.179; p = .568) (Additional file 1).

Results of studies heterogeneity assessment were variable across analyses, and most of the analyses showed moderate levels of heterogeneity (Table 3). Begg’s and Egger’s tests were used to assess potential for publication bias (Table 3). These tests were not significant for most of the analyses except for results of DBP. However, the Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill indicated no absent study was found and the adjusted estimate remained consistent with the original finding.

Table 3.

Summary of meta-analyses results:

Variables No. of studies Estimate Pooled effect size P value I2 test Begg’s test
(P value)
Egger’s test
(P value)
Vein diameter 12 SMD -0.429 (-0.534 to -0.323) < 0.001 0% 0.545 0.172
Artery diameter 12 SMD -0.427 (-0.573 to -0.282) < 0.001 41.9% 0.841 0.831
Arteriovenous fistula blood flow 3 SMD -0.729 (-1.181 to -0.277) 0.002 48.0% 0.333 0.066
Serum Albumin 6 SMD -0.423 (-0.733 to − 0.113) 0.007 69.2% 0.136 0.064
Systolic BP 7 SMD -0.346 (-0.651 to -0.040) 0.026 81.2% 1.00 0.973
Diastolic BP 7 SMD -0.30 (-0.565 to -0.025) 0.031 75.5% 0.562 0.034
BMI 12 SMD 0.044 (-0.136 to 0.226) 0.628 82.2% 0.737 0.620
Location (distal arteriovenous fistula) 11 OR 1.795 (1.305 to 2.468) < 0.001 43.7% 0.761 0.851
Diabetes mellitus 29 OR 1.314 (1.079 to 1.600) 0.006 59.4% 0.042 0.931
Smoking 15 OR 1.038 (0.914 to 1.179) 0.568 0% 0.181 0.759
Gender (female) 26 OR 1.423 (1.199 to 1.687) < 0.001 50.3% 0.321 0.443

Discussion

In this systematic review, we assessed factors that predispose ESRD patients on hemodialysis to non- maturation and early failure of native arteriovenous fistula created by surgically anastomosing an inflow artery to an outflow vein. The meta-analysis results identified several key risk factors of early arteriovenous fistula failure and non-maturation in ESRD patients on hemodialysis.

Hemodialysis vascular access can be achieved through three primary methods: native arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft, and central venous catheter. While arteriovenous fistula is considered the gold standard due to its superior durability and lower complication rates compared to other methods, arteriovenous graft can also serve as a reliable long-term access option for some patients. In contrast, central venous catheters are associated with significant risks, including bloodstream infections, sepsis, endocarditis, and spinal abscesses, making them the least preferred option [50]. This systematic review focuses on arteriovenous fistula due to its widespread use and clinical importance, aiming to identify predictors of early failure to optimize its outcomes.

The results revealed that a distally located arteriovenous fistula is associated with high risk of early failure compared to a more proximally located one. Proximally located veins are anatomically larger than distal ones, which affect the achievement of the blood flow needed for arteriovenous fistula function. In addition, most patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula creation have multiple comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and atherosclerosis, which primarily affect the arterial system. Furthermore, secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease contributes to dystrophic vascular calcification, particularly in distal arteries. This may lead to reduced blood flow in distal arteries, thereby diminishing the shear stress necessary for proper arterialization and distension of the vein [46, 51].

The meta-analysis confirms the role of low serum albumin as a predictive factor for early arteriovenous fistula failure in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Albumin plays a vital role in maintaining vascular integrity and capillary permeability, and its deficiency is often a marker of ongoing inflammation [52]. This pro-inflammatory state may promote blood coagulation and contribute to early occlusion of a newly created arteriovenous fistula before full maturation is achieved ( [53, 54]). Therefore, preoperative assessment and optimization of nutritional and inflammatory markers, including serum albumin, are essential in patients ESRD disease to minimize the risk of early arteriovenous fistula failure.

Notably, our meta-analysis found no significant association between smoking and primary AVF failure, which contrasts with the conventional understanding of smoking as a risk factor for vascular dysfunction. This unexpected finding may be due to heterogeneity in how smoking status was defined or reported across studies, variations in smoking exposure (e.g., current vs. former smokers), or limited statistical power in some analyses. Future studies should standardize smoking definitions and explore dose-response relationships to clarify its role in AVF outcomes.

Another significant predictor was blood vessels diameters. Both vein and artery diameters are key predictors of arteriovenous fistula maturation. Studies have shown that larger vessel diameters are associated with higher rates of successful maturation and patency ( [46, 55, 56]). Concerning blood pressure, studies showed that lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure was significantly associated with an increased risk of primary arteriovenous fistula failure. The mechanism may involve insufficient vascular pressure, leading to reduced shear stress on the vessel wall. This can result in vascular recoil and repetitive trauma, ultimately promoting thrombosis and arteriovenous fistula failure ( [57, 58]).

The findings of this review have important clinical implications. First, the consistent association between anatomical variables (particularly vessel diameter) and arteriovenous fistula maturation supports the routine use of preoperative vascular mapping via duplex ultrasound to guide fistula site selection and improve surgical planning [59]. Second, the predictive value of hypoalbuminemia and blood pressure parameters highlights the need for multidisciplinary care, including nutritional support and cardiovascular optimization, prior to arteriovenous fistula creation. Furthermore, understanding these risk factors can aid in the development of risk stratification tools, enabling nephrologists and vascular surgeons to individualize access planning based on a patient’s profile. Finally, identifying modifiable predictors presents an opportunity for targeted interventions (e.g., blood pressure control, correction of malnutrition) to improve arteriovenous fistula success rates.

Despite the strengths, this review has several limitations. The included studies were observational in nature, which increases the risk of residual confounding. The studies included were conducted in adult populations, limiting applicability to pediatric patients. Several studies reported on additional factors potentially associated with primary AVF failure but lacked sufficient data for meta-analysis. These included inflammatory markers such as elevated CRP, ESR, and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, as well as low hemoglobin levels. Other vital signs, such as pulse rate or temperature, were infrequently reported and inconsistently associated with AVF outcomes. These parameters warrant further investigation in future studies to determine their relevance to AVF maturation.

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis identified several significant predictors of primary arteriovenous fistula failure and non-maturation in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis. Key risk factors included distal arteriovenous fistula location, low serum albumin, smaller arterial and venous diameters, and abnormal blood pressure levels. These findings indicate the multifactorial nature of primary arteriovenous fistula failure and highlight the importance of comprehensive preoperative evaluation, including vascular mapping, nutritional status, and blood pressure control, which may enhance AVF maturation while avoiding unnecessary delays in access placement. Optimizing these factors may enhance fistula maturation and reduce the need for repeat vascular access procedures. However, recognizing that some risk factors may not be readily modifiable in ESRD patients, clinicians should balance optimization efforts with the urgency of establishing vascular access. Future studies should aim to standardize outcome definitions and explore interventions targeting modifiable risk factors to improve arteriovenous fistula outcomes.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

13037_2025_449_MOESM1_ESM.docx (123.6KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 1: Additional file 1: Additional meta-analyses for demographic and comorbidity-related predictors

Abbreviations

BMI

Body Mass Index

CI

Confidence Interval

CRP

C-reactive protein

DBP

Diastolic Blood Pressure

ESR

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

ESRD

End-Stage Renal Disease

OR

Odds Ratio

SBP

Systolic Blood Pressure

SMD

Standardized Mean Difference

Author contributions

SS conceptualized the research idea and plan. KS, MS, AAM, and YE undertook database searches and articles screening. AEA, ASA and NS undertook risk of bias assessment. KFA, AAOM, DI, SM, and AIM extracted and summarized data. SM analyzed data. SS, KM, AOM, and SM drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No fund.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bello AK, Okpechi IG, Osman MA, Cho Y, Htay H, Jha V, Wainstein M, Johnson DW. Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022;18(6):378–95. 10.1038/s41581-022-00542-7. Epub 2022 Feb 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Foundation NK. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for 2006 updates: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy, and vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;(suppl 1):S1–322.
  • 3.Rosas SE, Feldman HI. Synthetic vascular hemodialysis access versus native arteriovenous fistula: a cost-utility analysis. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):181–6. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822f4e9b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Roy-Chaudhury P, Arend L, Zhang J, Krishnamoorthy M, Wang Y, Banerjee R, Samaha A, Munda R. Neointimal hyperplasia in early arteriovenous fistula failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;50(5):782–90. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mulaney-Topkar B, Ho VT, Sgroi MD, Garcia-Toca M, George EL. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular vs surgical arteriovenous fistula creation in the United States. J Vasc Surg. 2024;79(2):366–e3811. 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Venkat Ramanan S, Prabhu RA, Rao IR, Chawla A, Shenoy SV, Nagaraju SP, Bhojaraja MV. Outcomes and predictors of failure of arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022;54(1):185–92. 10.1007/s11255-021-02908-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Feldman HI, Kobrin S, Wasserstein A. Hemodialysis vascular access morbidity. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7(4):523–35. 10.1681/ASN.V74523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):e1–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1(2):97–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta‐analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abreu R, Rioja S, Vallespin J, Vinuesa X, Iglesias R, Ibeas J. Predictors of early failure and secondary patency in native arteriovenous fistulas for Hemodialysis. Int Angiol; 2018. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Abreu R. New hemodynamic variables as predictors of arteriovenous fistula maturation. Semin Dial. 2022;35(4):358–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bahrami-Ahmadi A, Khavanin Zadeh M, Chehrehgosha H, Abbasi M. Early failure of arteriovenous fistula (AVF): the effect of diabetes and hypertension in a cross-sectional study. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Akin D, Ozmen S, Kaya R. A novel factor for primary arteriovenous fistula failure: hyperinsulinism. Ren Fail. 2016;38(8):1206–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hoang Anh T, Nguyen PA, Duong A, Chiu IJ, Chou CL, Ko YC, et al. Contact laxative use and the risk of arteriovenous fistula maturation failure in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a multi-center cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(11):6842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aitken E, Jackson A, Kong C, Coats P, Kingsmore D. Renal function, uraemia and early arteriovenous fistula failure. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15(1):179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bahadi A, Hamzi MA, Farouki MR, Montasser D, Zajjari Y, Arache W et al. Predictors of early vascular-access failure in patients on hemodialysis. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2012;23(1):83–7 [PubMed]
  • 19.Bashar K, Zafar A, Elsheikh S, Healy DA, Clarke-Moloney M, Casserly L et al. Predictive parameters of arteriovenous fistula functional maturation in a population of patients with end-stage renal disease. James LR, editor. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0119958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Bhuwania S, Goel R, Bansal R, Saxena S. Prospective evaluation of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula to determine the causes for non maturity with clinical and ultrasonography-doppler. Indian J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;8(Suppl 2):S147–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bojakowski K, Dzabic M, Kurzejamska E, Styczynski G, Andziak P, Gaciong Z et al. A high red blood cell distribution width predicts failure of arteriovenous fistula. Moura IC, editor. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e36482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 22.Bosanquet DC, Rubasingham J, Imam M, Woolgar JD, Davies CG. Predicting outcomes in native AV forearm radio-cephalic fistulae; the CAVeA2 T2 scoring system. J Vasc Access. 2015;16(1):19–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.De Winter EP, Wilschut D, Plasmans K, Eefting D, Van Der Steenhoven T, Putter H, et al. Intraoperative transit time flow measurement predicts maturation of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas. J Vasc Surg. 2024;80(1):232–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ernandez T, Saudan P, Berney T, Merminod T, Bednarkiewicz M, Martin PY. Risk factors for early failure of native arteriovenous fistulas. Nephron Clin Pract. 2005;101(1):c39–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eslami MH, Zhu CK, Rybin D, Doros G, Siracuse JJ, Farber A. Simple predictive model of early failure among patients undergoing first-time arteriovenous fistula creation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;35:46–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Farber A, Imrey PB, Huber TS, Kaufman JM, Kraiss LW, Larive B, et al. Multiple preoperative and intraoperative factors predict early fistula thrombosis in the hemodialysis fistula maturation study. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(1):163–e1706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Feldman HI, Joffe M, Rosas SE, Burns JE, Knauss J, Brayman K. Predictors of successful arteriovenous fistula maturation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(5):1000–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Malovrh M. Vein diameter after intraoperative dilatation with vessel probes as a predictor of success of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:191–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sheng J, Li R kuan. analysis-of-arteriovenous-fistula-failure-in-hemodialysis-patients. Biomed Res. 2016;27(2)
  • 30.Gibyeli Genek D, Tuncer Altay C, Unek T, Sifil A, Seçil M, Camsari T. Can primary failure of arteriovenous fistulas be anticipated? Hemodial Int. 2015;19(2):296–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ghosh NK, Bhattacharjee HK, Prajapati O, Krishna A, Kumar A, Mahajan S, et al. Impact of clinical parameters and vascular haemodynamics on arterio-venous fistula maturation in patients with end stage renal disease: a prospective study on Indian patients. J Vasc Access. 2022;23(4):508–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hod T, DeSilva RN, Patibandla BK, Vin Y, Brown RS, Goldfarb-Rumyantzev AS. Factors predicting failure of AV fistula first policy in the elderly. Hemodial Int. 2014;18(2):507–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Huijbregts HJTAM, Bots ML, Moll FL, Blankestijn PJ. Hospital specific aspects predominantly determine primary failure of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(5):962–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kim YO, Yang CW, Yoon SA, Chun KA, Kim NI, Park JS, et al. Access blood flow as a predictor of early failures of native arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2001;21(3):221–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kim JK, Jeong JH, Song YR, Kim HJ, Lee WY, Kim KI, et al. Obesity-related decrease in intraoperative blood flow is associated with maturation failure of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(4):1010–e10171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim M, Kim Y, Jun K, Hwang J, Kim S, Kim J et al. Clinical importance of intraoperative cephalic vein distensibility as a predictor of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula maturation. Semin Dial. 2015. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 37.Martinez-Mier G, Camargo-Diaz C, Urbina-Velazquez MA, Avila-Pardo SF. Predictive factors for unsuccessful use of arteriovenous fistula in a population of end-stage renal disease patients in Southeastern Mexico. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;62:304–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Meyer A, Flicker E, König ST, Vetter AS. Determinants of successful arteriovenous fistulae creation including intraoperative transit time flow measurement. J Vasc Access. 2020;21(3):387–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ozhan A, Memetoglu ME, Kehlibar T, Bastopcu M, Yilmaz M, Karakaya C, et al. Transposition of brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistulas: one-stage or two‐stage technique and factors affecting the early maturation. Ther Apher Dial. 2021;25(5):636–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pandey S, Kumar M, Agrawal M, Singh M, Aggarwal A, Garg G, et al. The effects of preoperative blood pressure on early failure rate of distal arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis access. Hemodial Int. 2019;23(3):314–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Park YJ, Gloviczki P, Kim Y, wook, Kwon JD, Kim DI, Jang HR, et al. The influence of cephalic vein diameter and diabetes on primary maturation and patency of autogenous radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(4):1003–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pratama D, Muradi A, Saharui A, Kekalih A, Ferian MF, Amin BF. Brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula maturity in end stage renal disease: the role of intraoperative brachial artery blood flow rate and peak systolic velocity. SAGE Open Med. 2023;11:20503121231196011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Venkat Ramanan S, Prabhu RA, Rao IR, Chawla A, Shenoy SV, Nagaraju SP, et al. Outcomes and predictors of failure of arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022;54(1):185–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sari F, Taskapan H, Sigirci A, Akpinar B. Evaluation of risk factors for arteriovenous fistula failure in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Erciyes Tıp DergisiErciyes Med J. 2016;38(1):12–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Saucy F, Haesler E, Haller C, Deglise S, Teta D, Corpataux JM. Is intra-operative blood flow predictive for early failure of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula? Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2010;25(3):862–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tubail Z, Dinot V, Goetz C, Savenkoff B. Venous distensibility may be an indicator of early arteriovenous fistula failure, a retrospective single-centre cohort study. Ren Fail. 2024;46(2):2420829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wongmahisorn Y. Role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator for hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula failure. J Vasc Access. 2019;20(6):608–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yan Y, Su X, Zheng J, Zhang L, Yang L, Jiang Q, et al. Association of preoperative mean arterial pressure with the primary failure of Brescia-Cimino arteriovenous fistula within the first 7 days following surgery in hemodialysis patients. Ther Apher Dial. 2018;22(5):539–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zadeh MK, Gholipour F, Hadipour R. The effect of hemoglobin level on arteriovenous fistula survival in Iranian hemodialysis patients. J Vasc Access. 2008;9(2):133–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lok CE, Foley R. Vascular access morbidity and mortality: trends of the last decade. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(7):1213–9. 10.2215/CJN.01690213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dube P, DeRiso A, Patel M, Battepati D, Khatib-Shahidi B, Sharma H, Gupta R, Malhotra D, Dworkin L, Haller S, Kennedy D. Vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease: diversity in the vessel wall. Biomedicines. 2021;9(4):404. 10.3390/biomedicines9040404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Aldecoa C, Llau JV, Nuvials X, Artigas A. Role of albumin in the preservation of endothelial glycocalyx integrity and the microcirculation: a review. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yap YS, Chi WC, Lin CH, Liu YC, Wu YW. Association of early failure of arteriovenous fistula with mortality in hemodialysis patients. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tanaka A, Inaguma D, Watanabe Y, Ito E, Kamegai N, Shimogushi H, et al. Factors associated with early failure of vascular access in acute-phase patients. Ren Replace Ther. 2016;2(1):59. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bashar K, Clarke-Moloney M, Burke PE, Kavanagh EG, Walsh SR. The role of venous diameter in predicting arteriovenous fistula maturation: when not to expect an AVF to mature according to pre-operative vein diameter measurements? A best evidence topic. Int J Surg. 2015;15:95–9. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bahi M. Effect of artery diameter and velocity and vein diameter on upper limb arteriovenous fistula outcomes. ScientificWorldJournal. 2022;2022:2158013. 10.1155/2022/2158013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Talaiezadeh AH, Askarpour S, Paziar F. Factors responsible for fistula failure in hemodialysis patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2006;22(4). ISSN 1681-715X. [PubMed]
  • 58.Yan Y, et al. Association of preoperative mean arterial pressure with the primary failure of brescia-cimino arteriovenous fistula within the first 7 days following surgery in hemodialysis patients. Therapeutic Apheresis Dialysis. 2018;22(5):539–43. 10.1111/1744-9987.12670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Robbin ML, Gallichio MH, Deierhoi MH, Young CJ, Weber TM, Allon M. US vascular mapping before hemodialysis access placement. Radiology. 2000;217(1):83–8. 10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00oc2883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

13037_2025_449_MOESM1_ESM.docx (123.6KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 1: Additional file 1: Additional meta-analyses for demographic and comorbidity-related predictors

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Patient Safety in Surgery are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES