The Conflict of interest statement was erroneously given as “Author XY was employed by Leibniz Institute DSMZ, which is an independent, non-profit research infrastructure.
All authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.”
The correct Conflict of interest statement is “Author BB, CS alnd JW was employed by Leibniz Institute DSMZ, which is an independent, non-profit research infrastructure.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.”
The original version of this article has been updated.
In the published article, there was a mistake in the numbers of isolated phages. The number of myoviruses was given as “13” and the number of podoviruses as “eight”.
A correction has been made to the section 3.2 Phage morphology, Line 284:285:
“Using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the 25 phages were classified as twelve myoviruses including three jumbo phages, four siphoviruses and nine podoviruses (Figure 1)”.
The original version of this article has been updated.
Conflict of interest
Author BB, CS alnd JW was employed by Leibniz Institute DSMZ, which is an independent, non-profit research infrastructure.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.