Skip to main content
Science Advances logoLink to Science Advances
. 2025 Sep 3;11(36):eadr9635. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adr9635

Volcanic emission of reduced sulfur species shaped the climate of early Mars

Lucia G Bellino 1,2,*, Chenguang Sun 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC12407074  PMID: 40901941

Abstract

Sulfur and other volatiles could be transported from the martian interior to surface through magmatic processes, including mantle melting, magma differentiation, and degassing. However, these processes were not fully integrated in past sulfur cycling models because of complexity from the gas-melt interactions in chemically and dynamically evolving magmatic systems with multicomponent volatiles. Here, we incorporate these processes to simulate how sulfur, carbon, and hydrogen degas from martian melts. We find that reduced sulfur species, H2S and S2, are dominantly emitted through degassing at crustal to surficial pressures. These sulfur species could condense as sulfide and elemental sulfur, potentially yielding the sulfate deposits observed on the martian surface through secondary oxidation. Our models also show that evolved magmas reach graphite and sulfide saturation at crustal pressures and thus may establish sulfur and carbon reservoirs in the martian crust. The degassed H2S and S2 may form a hazy atmosphere with SF6, a potent greenhouse gas, to shape the paleoclimate of Mars.


Reduced sulfur species are primarily degassed from evolving martian melts, inducing a hazy, greenhouse atmosphere on early Mars.

INTRODUCTION

Prominent observations of fluvial activity on early Mars suggest a climate condition with surface temperatures warm enough to enable the sustained presence of liquid water ~3 to 4 billion years ago (Ga) (1). Yet, the composition (24), duration (5), and pressure (6, 7) of the martian greenhouse gas paleoatmosphere remain largely unknown. With widespread sedimentary sulfate deposits on Mars (811) and abundant sulfide in martian meteorites (1215), sulfur cycling is likely a critical process affecting the martian paleoclimate (16), which is also documented by the mass-independent sulfur isotope anomalies in martian meteorites (17). Earlier models suggested that SO2 could induce a greenhouse effect warm enough to sustain liquid water on Mars (1820). This notion was supported by theoretical studies on volcanic degassing of C-H-O-S volatiles (21, 22) that indicated SO2 as a primary gas species near the surface. As SO2 can extensively acidify water, such volcanic gases should inhibit carbonate formation on Mars. The consequential absence of carbonates, however, does not align with the growing body of carbonate observations on Mars (2330), some of which are likely intermixed with sulfate (31). We note that previous studies may overestimate the volcanic SO2 flux as they exclude (i) magma differentiation and (ii) saturation of sulfide and graphite. Incorporating these processes, we systematically assess the volcanic sulfur cycle and its role in shaping the climate of early Mars.

Given the recent observations of felsic through ultramafic rocks (3234) on Mars, magma differentiation should be pervasive in the martian crust. As volatile elements (e.g., hydrogen, carbon, and sulfur) are generally incompatible in cumulate minerals, magma differentiation can concentrate them in the evolved melt and hence change the initial degassing depth and gas compositions (35). Because of the fractionation of Fe3+ and Fe2+ by cumulate minerals, magma differentiation may also substantially affect the redox condition of the evolved melt (3538), leading to variations in gas compositions. Notably, previous works suggested that magma differentiation with degassing could vary the oxygen fugacity (ƒo2) of martian magmas from ~0 to 4 log units below the fayalite-magnetite-quartz (FMQ) redox buffer (39, 40). Martian magmas likely reached graphite and sulfide saturation during differentiation and degassing, as evidenced by the presence of graphite (41) and abundant sulfide minerals (1215) in igneous martian meteorites. The saturation of graphite and sulfide could also affect degassing by changing the redox budget and total contents of carbon and sulfur in the magmatic system.

Considering the aforementioned complexities, we simulated degassing of C-H-O-S volatiles from chemically and dynamically evolving magmatic systems in early Mars. Four samples were selected as representatives of primary and evolved melts to encapsulate the ƒo2 and compositional variations during differentiation of magmas derived from two different sources (depleted versus enriched). The volatile compositions of the primary melts were estimated from martian mantle melting, whereas those of the evolved melts were adjusted according to their extents of crystallization. We conducted polybaric degassing simulations using the Magma and Gas Equilibrium Calculator (MAGEC) (35, 42) with nine volatile species (i.e., CO, CO2, CH4, COS, H2, H2O, H2S, S2, and SO2) and model options suitable for martian conditions. The pressure range (5 kbars to 0.01 bars) of degassing spans the base of the crust to the surface (see Materials and Methods).

We show that differentiation of primary martian melts yields graphite and sulfide saturation in their evolved melts at crustal pressures. Graphite saturation could reduce the gaseous SO2/H2S ratio by about one order of magnitude, whereas sulfide saturation can increase the gaseous SO2/H2S ratio by ~3 to 5 orders of magnitude. The total sulfur abundances in the gas become notable when the magma ascends to near-surface depths. We find that H2S and S2 are the dominant sulfur species with abundances of ≳10 mol % in volcanic gases from the primary and evolved magmas. These reduced sulfur species can readily form optically thick haze through photolysis (43) and potent greenhouse gases, contributing to climate regulation on early Mars.

RESULTS

Sample characterization

We chose two olivine-phyric shergottites, Yamato (Y-)980459 and Northwest Africa (NWA) 1068 (44), as representatives of primary melts from the depleted and enriched mantle sources. With rhyolite-MELTS (45, 46) modeling of the liquid lines of descent, we took two basaltic shergottites, Queen Alexandra Range (QUE) 94201 and Los Angeles, as the evolved melts derived from the primitive magmas of Y-980459 and NWA 1068, respectively (Fig. 1 and fig. S1). The depleted series is characterized by more reduced conditions with a smaller variation in the ƒo2 (Y-980459: ∆FMQ = −3.7; QUE 94201: ∆FMQ = −3.0) (47) than those of the enriched series (NWA 1068: ∆FMQ = −2.5; Los Angeles: ∆FMQ = −1.3) (47, 48). Primary magma hydrogen and sulfur compositions were estimated from 10% partial melting of the mantle (49). We chose 150 parts per million by weight (ppm) H2O and 500 ppm S for the martian mantle among the recommended ranges for H2O (anhydrous to >500 ppm) (5057) and sulfur (<700 to 1000 ppm) (58). Following previous assumptions of a graphite-saturated mantle (59, 60), we estimated 180 ppm C for the primary melt from the depleted source, which was also used for that from the enriched source. Applying the olivine-melt geothermometer (61) to the bulk compositions (44), we calculated the liquid temperatures of these four samples at 5 kbars to be ~1100° to 1500°C. With an assumed solidus temperature of 950°C, the liquid temperatures indicate that QUE 94201 and Los Angeles experienced ~55 and 70% crystallization. The concentrations of H-S-C in the evolved melts were thus adjusted according to the extents of crystallization (data S1), from which we estimate predegassed volatile contents for QUE 94201 (i.e., 0.33 wt % H2O, 1.10 wt % S, and 0.04 wt % C) and Los Angeles (i.e., 0.49 wt % H2O, 1.64 wt % S, and 0.06 wt % C).

Fig. 1. Selected meteorite compositions.

Fig. 1.

Plots (A) and (B) show Al2O3 and SiO2 contents of the melt as a function of MgO. The solid lines display the rhyolite-MELTS (45, 46) modeled liquid lines of descent for the depleted (blue) and enriched (purple) magmas of Y-980459 and NWA 1068, respectively, whose bulk compositions are taken from (44). The composition of the evolved sample, Los Angeles basaltic shergottite (44), falls on the liquid line of descent of NWA 1068 to represent the enriched trend (purple triangles). Similarly, the composition of the evolved sample, QUE 94201 basaltic shergottite (44), falls on the liquid line of descent of Y-980459, to represent the depleted trend (blue circles). Compositions of other shergottites (44) that were not selected are plotted as gray circles.

Degassing pathways, saturation of graphite and sulfide, and redox variations

Results of simulations conducted with the MAGEC program show that the saturation of CO2 and CO gases initiates degassing for the selected martian magmas in the lower to upper crust (Fig. 2A and data S2). During degassing, the primary melts (Y-980459 and NWA 1068) are undersaturated with graphite and sulfide. However, with the increase in volatile concentrations due to differentiation, the evolved melts (QUE 94201 and Los Angeles) are saturated with graphite at initial degassing depths and maintain sulfide saturation from initial degassing to ~0.3 bars.

Fig. 2. MAGEC modeling results of C-H-O-S volatiles in the gas and melt.

Fig. 2.

Plot (A) depicts the modeled gas compositions and redox variations for the selected meteorite compositions as a function of pressure. Plot (B) displays the modeled volatile compositions in the melt as a function of pressure during degassing. The pressure intervals of graphite and sulfide saturation are shown in plot (B) as gray and yellow bars, respectively.

The initial degassing pressures (P0) of the two primary melts (Y-980459 and NWA 1068) vary from 2.0 to 1.4 kbars. This is because the higher initial ƒo2 (FMQ-2.5) of NWA 1068 stabilizes more CO2 (Fig. 2B), which is more soluble in the melt than CO, to initiate degassing at shallower depths. Conversely, P0 of their evolved melts (QUE 94201 and Los Angeles) range from 1.3 to 3.2 kbars. Because these melts are saturated with graphite upon initial degassing, the total carbon budget in the predegassed melt strongly depends on the initial ƒo2. At graphite saturation, the higher initial ƒo2 of Los Angeles allows the melt to dissolve more CO2 (Fig. 2B) and therefore facilitates vapor saturation at greater depths.

As pressure decreases during degassing, the primary melts show little variation in ƒo2 but become gradually reduced at pressures of ≲1 bar (Fig. 2A). Their decreases of ƒo2 near surface are due to the amplified degassing of oxidized sulfur and hydrogen species (e.g., SO2 and H2O; Fig. 2A). Graphite saturation in the evolved melts at their initial degassing depths appears to decrease the ƒo2 by ~0.3 to 1 log unit following the graphite–CO–CO2 redox buffer (Fig. 2A). Upon cessation of graphite saturation, the evolved melts become increasingly oxidized by ~0.5 to 2 log units resulting from removal of S2− by sulfide saturation.

To better characterize the reducing capacity of the magmatic gases, we calculated the index of reducing power (Rp) for the magmatic gases following the definition from a previous work (35), which is determined by the ratio of all reduced to oxidized species. The Rp values of magmatic gases (Fig. 3A) generally display an inverse trend with ƒo2 (Fig. 2A). Because of the relatively more reduced conditions, the gases emitted by the primary melts generally show greater Rp values than those from the evolved melts (Fig. 3A). Notably, at near-surface pressure (~0.1 to 1 bar), the Rp values of all magmatic gases vary within a small range (~−0.2 to +0.5; Fig. 3A), comparable to those of terrestrial submarine gases (−0.02 ± 0.2) (35).

Fig. 3. Reducing capacity and volatile speciation of magmatic gases.

Fig. 3.

Plot (A) shows the reducing power (Rp) of the magmatic gases during degassing as a function of pressure for the four tested meteorite compositions. The gray boxes denote the log(Rp) values of terrestrial submarine and subaerial gases (34). Plots (B to F) display the molar ratios of CO2/CO, H2O/H2, SO2/H2S, S2/H2S, and COS/CO2 in the magmatic gases.

C-H-O-S volatiles in magmatic gases

The magmatic gases are mainly composed of CO, CO2, H2, H2O, H2S, S2, and SO2 with minor COS and trace CH4 (Fig. 2A). Among the degassed species, CO and CO2 are the most abundant species degassed at crustal pressures of ≳2 to 20 bars due to their relatively lower solubilities. At more reduced conditions, the high-pressure magmatic gases from the depleted series (Y-980459 and QUE 94201) show much lower CO2/CO molar ratios (≈0.1 to 0.8) than those (≈0.9 to 7) from the enriched series (NWA 1068 and Los Angeles) (Fig. 3B). Following extensive degassing of CO and CO2 at high pressures, H2O becomes a dominant species in the gas (≳30 to 40 mol %) near the martian surface (~1 bar) because of its lower solubility at shallower pressures (Fig. 2A). At near-surface depths, the lower ƒo2 conditions of the depleted series permit considerable H2 degassing with a H2O/H2 molar ratio of ≈1 to 4, whereas the higher ƒo2 conditions of the enriched series produce more H2O-rich gases with a H2O/H2 molar ratio of ≈2 to 15 (Fig. 3C).

Our simulations show that H2S and S2 are the predominant sulfur species in the magmatic gases at all tested pressures (Fig. 3, D and E). Although the abundances of SO2 and H2S are equivalent at pressures of ≲0.1 bars for enriched martian magmas, SO2 never appears to be more abundant than H2S and is at maximum only ~17% of the total gaseous sulfur. For all tested compositions, COS in the gas follows CO2 with nearly constant ratios for individual samples (Fig. 3F), but its concentration decreases from ~1 mol % at the initial degassing pressure to ~0.001 mol % at near-surface pressures (Fig. 2A). The degassing of CH4 is positively correlated with the bulk carbon contents of the melts and the decreasing ƒo2. Given the lower carbon contents, the primary melts permit negligible degassing of CH4 with concentrations (≲0.0001 mol %) less than those from the evolved melts by ~3 to 4 orders of magnitude. There is a slight increase in CH4 degassing from the evolved melts associated with graphite saturation and the corresponding decrease in ƒo2 (Fig. 2A). However, with the increasing ƒo2 spurred by sulfide saturation, CH4 degassing from the evolved melts also becomes negligible at pressures of ≲10 bars.

C-H-O-S volatiles dissolved in martian melts

Martian melts from our simulations contain S2−, H2O, CO2, CO, and H2 with minor S6+ and trace CH4. Our results indicate that, across the tested range of degassing pressures (0.01 bars to 5 kbars), reduced sulfur (S2−) is consistently the most abundant species (~0.2 to 0.5 wt %) in both primary and evolved martian magmas (Fig. 2B). The dissolved S2− contents in the primary melts, which are sulfide undersaturated, decrease from 0.5 to ~0.2 wt % as the degassing pressure decreases to 0.01 bars. However, S2− concentrations in the evolved melts remain at ~0.5 wt % at pressures of ≳0.3 bars due to sulfide saturation and then decrease slightly to ~0.3 wt % at 0.01 bars by degassing. At crustal pressures, H2O is highly soluble in martian magmas. Although the predegassed melt concentrations of H2O can range from ~0.15 to 0.5 wt % depending on differentiation, heightened H2O degassing at near-surface pressures causes all melts to contain ~40 to 70 ppm H2O at ~0.01 bars. The reduced conditions of the depleted series cause the degassed melt to have a lower dissolved CO2/CO ratio by weight (≈0.01 to 2) in comparison to that (≈0.1 to 15) of the oxidized, enriched series (Fig. 2B). The dissolved CO2 contents of all melts decrease by ~4 to 6 orders of magnitude from 5 kbars to surface pressures as CO2 is degassed.

Minor and trace C-H-O-S constituents (H2, S6+, and CH4) are all in abundances of ≲10 ppm in martian magmas (Fig. 2B). Because of their lower abundance of hydrogen before degassing, the primary melts contain less dissolved H2 than the evolved melts by a factor of 10. The concentration of H2 in the primary melts declines at ~1 bar in alignment with the magnified degassing of oxidized sulfur and hydrogen species at shallow depths, resulting in an overall decrease in the H2 concentration by ~3 orders of magnitude. Within evolved melts, the dissolved H2 concentration decreases at ~10 bars by ~5 orders of magnitude because of their increase in oxidation state associated with sulfide saturation and graphite undersaturation. Like H2, the concentration of S6+ is greater in the evolved melts than the primary melts; however, the maximum S6+ melt concentration is merely ~1 ppm. Its abundance in the melt is highly reflective of the ƒo2 conditions, causing the S6+ concentration in evolved melts to fluctuate substantially more than in primary melts. The least abundant component of the melt is CH4 at a maximum concentration of ~0.1 ppm.

DISCUSSION

Sulfur degassing and speciation

The most notable observation from our simulations is the more dominant presence of reduced sulfur species (S2 and H2S) over oxidized sulfur species (SO2) in the gases from martian magmas at crustal and surface pressures. To highlight the change of sulfur speciation during degassing, we plotted the ratios of three major sulfur species in the magmatic gas as a function of pressure (Fig. 3, D and E). The magmatic gases from Y-980459 show a lower SO2/H2S ratio than that of the NWA 1068 melt due to its comparatively reduced condition. As pressure decreases, the SO2/H2S molar ratio of magmatic gases from these two primary melts increases by a factor of ~5 to 10 and reaches up to ~0.1 to 1.

The systematic variation of gaseous SO2/H2S ratios is likely controlled by the degassed major volatile species (hydrogen and carbon) and redox condition. At crustal pressures (≳2 to 20 bars), CO2 and CO are the major species in the gas and likely dominate the sulfur species through

H2S(g)+3CO2(g)=SO2(g)+3CO(g)+H2O(g) (1)

At near-surface pressures (≲1 bar), H2 and H2O could regulate sulfur speciation by the equilibrium reaction

H2S(g)+2H2O(g)=SO2(g)+3H2(g) (2)

Note that a lower pressure facilitates both reactions toward the right-hand side and thus increases the SO2/H2S ratio. During degassing, the variation in SO2/H2S ratios of the magmatic gases from the evolved melts is also strongly associated with the change in ƒo2. In particular, the SO2/H2S ratios of the gases from the evolved melts decrease by ~1 to 2 orders of magnitude at graphite saturation and then increase by ~3 to 4 orders of magnitude (Fig. 3D) along with sulfide saturation (Fig. 2F). However, the maximum SO2/H2S molar ratios only reach ~0.2 to 1.3 at 0.01 bars (Fig. 3D).

The S2/H2S molar ratios in the gas follow similar trends as SO2/H2S ratios during degassing and can reach up to ≈4 to 10 at ~0.01 bars (Fig. 3E). Notably, the relative abundances of S2 and H2S in magmatic gases from Y-980459, QUE 94201, and Los Angeles show a crossover (S2/H2S = 1) at pressures near the martian surface (~1 bar). With a relatively more oxidized condition, the magmatic gases from NWA 1068 show higher S2/H2S ratios than those from Y-980459. Yet, the magmatic gases from both primary melts maintain greater S2/H2S ratios than those from their evolved melts although the primary magmas release slightly less S2 (~7 to 18 mol %) than evolved magmas (~11 to 30 mol %) at martian surface pressures. This is because H2S degassing is likely governed by the equilibrium reaction

S2(melt)+2OH(melt)=H2S(g)+2O2(melt) (3)

With lower H2O contents, the primary magmas emit less H2S (~0.001 to 10 mol %) than the evolved melts (~0.1 to 20 mol %) at crustal pressures of >1 bar.

Variable mantle volatile compositions

We note that our simulations were on the basis of fixed hydrogen and sulfur compositions for a graphite-saturated mantle (H2O = 150 ppm; S = 500 ppm). It is plausible that the martian mantle contains volatile compositions different from those originally modeled here. In particular, the mantle H2O content of Mars is contested, with estimates of the shergottite mantle source ranging from nearly anhydrous (~15 ppm) to >500 ppm H2O (5057), whereas estimates for sulfur in the martian mantle range from 360 to 1000 ppm (58, 62). To test whether this would substantially affect the simulation results, we rerun the MAGEC degassing model by considering additional scenarios of variable H2O (30 and 300 ppm) and sulfur contents (300 and 1000 ppm) in the martian mantle (figs. S2 to S5 and data S3 to S6).

When considering the large difference in mantle H2O, one might expect there to be proportional differences in the concentrations of H2O in the melts, which may cause more notable variations to the gaseous SO2/H2S and S2/H2S ratios (cf. Eq. 3). This anticipated trend is evident at crustal depths where H2O is highly soluble in the melt. As the mantle H2O content increased by a factor of 10, we found that the SO2/H2S and S2/H2S ratios of the magmatic gases decreased by two orders of magnitude at crustal pressures, which is consistent with the stoichiometric coefficient of dissolved H2O in Eq. 3 (Fig. 4). Yet, the expected trend does not appear near the surface where H2O is extensively degassed. In this case, the concentrations of H2O in the melts from the H2O-rich mantle are slightly greater than those derived from the H2O-poor mantle by a factor of ~1.5 to 2. Such an increase in dissolved H2O in the melts at near-surface pressure decreases the gaseous SO2/H2S and S2/H2S ratios of the enriched series by a factor of ~3 (cf. Eq. 3). However, for the depleted series, the SO2/H2S and S2/H2S ratios are substantially affected by their more reduced conditions that can lower H2O content in the melt.

Fig. 4. Variations in SO2/H2S and S2/H2S ratios of magmatic gases due to variable mantle H2O compositions.

Fig. 4.

The plot depicts the molar ratios of SO2/H2S (circles) and S2/H2S (diamonds) in magmatic gases at crustal (1 kbar; unshaded) and atmospheric (0.1 bars; shaded) pressures for three choices of mantle H2O contents (30, 150, and 300 ppm). Magmas that are graphite and/or sulfide saturated at the specific pressure condition are marked by an “x” and/or a cross, respectively.

In the case of variable mantle sulfur contents, the increase in mantle sulfur generally leads to the increase in S2 in the magmatic gases from the primary and evolved melts at sulfide-undersaturated conditions. However, the gaseous SO2 and H2S from the primary and evolved melts show distinct trends, as manifested by the SO2/H2S ratios in Fig. 5. With the increase in mantle sulfur, the SO2/H2S ratios of the magmatic gases from evolved melts increase by a factor of ~2 to 6, whereas those from primary melts decrease by a factor of ~2 to 3. The differing trends of the gaseous SO2/H2S ratios for the evolved versus the primary melts can be explained by the disproportionation of S2 exothermically into SO2 (i.e., ½ S2 + O2 = SO2) and endothermically into H2S (i.e., ½ S2 + H2O = H2S + ½ O2). As the mantle sulfur content increases, the cooler temperatures of the evolved melts favor increased SO2 emission (i.e., raising the gaseous SO2/H2S ratios) whereas the warmer temperatures of the primary melts prefer degassing more H2S (i.e., decreasing the gaseous SO2/H2S ratios). When the melts reach sulfide saturation (e.g., Los Angeles and QUE 94201 at 1 kbar; Fig. 5), the concentrations of SO2, S2, and H2S in their magmatic gases do not appear to be affected by the variation of mantle sulfur contents. This is because sulfide saturation buffers the activity of S2− in the melt and hence controls the degassing of different sulfur species (e.g., H2S in Eq. 3) to be independent of variable total sulfur budgets in the magmatic system. We would like to emphasize that H2S and S2 remain the predominant sulfur species in the magmatic gases from both primary and evolved melts at the crustal and surface pressures.

Fig. 5. Variations in SO2/H2S and S2/H2S ratios of magmatic gases due to variable mantle sulfur compositions.

Fig. 5.

The plot shows the molar ratios of SO2/H2S (circles) and S2/H2S (diamonds) in magmatic gases at crustal (1 kbar; unshaded) and atmospheric (0.1 bars; shaded) pressures for three choices of mantle sulfur contents (300, 500, and 1000 ppm). Magmas that are graphite and/or sulfide saturated at the specific pressure condition are marked by an “x” and/or a cross, respectively.

Implications for the early martian climate

The atmosphere and climate of early Mars remain unknown, but abundant observations of sulfides in martian meteorites (1215) and widespread detections of sulfates at the martian surface (811) suggest that sulfur cycling could have played a key role in shaping the climate of Mars ~3 to 4 Ga. Through a comprehensive assessment of C-H-O-S degassing in evolving martian magmas, we show that reduced sulfur, as H2S and S2, were the dominant sulfur species emitted from early martian magmatism as opposed to oxidized sulfur as SO2. This notion appears to be consistent across a wide range of mantle volatile compositions. Lowering the pressure can increase SO2 in magmatic gases dominated by hydrogen and/or carbon volatiles; however, the low redox budget of the martian melts before degassing limits the relative proportion of oxidized versus reduced sulfur species.

With the incorporation of magmatic differentiation, our models indicate evolved martian magmas, distinct from their primary counterparts, obtain sulfide saturation at pressures spanning the martian crust through surface because of their increased dissolved S2− content. The observations of sulfides as rounded droplets and ellipsoidal blebs in shergottites, as well as correlation between sulfides in shergottites with differentiation proxies (e.g., bulk Mg number and Ni content in sulfide) (15, 63) support our modeled results of igneous sulfide formation in evolved magmas. The precipitated sulfide in the martian crust could potentially serve as a sulfur reservoir to extend the duration of sulfur cycling if reworked by later magmatism. Degassed sulfur on Mars ~3 to 4 Ga would likely be reduced, in the form of H2S at crustal pressures and S2 at pressures relevant to the martian surface. At the surface (~0.1 to 1 bar), martian magmatic gases can contain ≳11 mol % H2S and ≳30 mol % S2.

We note that the emitted H2S and S2 vapors could readily precipitate into sulfide and elemental sulfur, respectively, on the martian surface. The Curiosity rover recently observed elemental sulfur on Mars at Gediz Vallis, Gale Crater (64), supporting our simulation results. To reconcile reduced sulfur degassing with observations of oxidized sulfates at the martian surface, we suggest that the precipitated sulfide and elemental sulfur from magmatic gases likely undergo oxidative hydrologic weathering. A previous study proposes that hydrologic weathering could oxidize sulfide (FeS) and elemental sulfur (S0) alongside weathering of the basaltic martian crust to produce the (Ca, Mg, Fe)SO4 sedimentary sulfate deposits (65). Taken collectively, we posit that sulfur cycling on early Mars was characterized by multistage processes (Fig. 6): (i) the release of reduced sulfur species from magmatic degassing, (ii) formation of sulfide and elemental sulfur at the martian surface, and (iii) subsequent conversion into sulfate through a secondary oxidative weathering mechanism.

Fig. 6. Schematic illustration of sulfur cycling from an evolving crustal magmatic system on early Mars.

Fig. 6.

Primary magmas in the martian crust are undersaturated with graphite and sulfide, but their differentiation can yield graphite and sulfide saturation in their evolved magmas. Martian magmas degas variable C-H-O-S volatile species, among which the dominant ones are S2 and H2S. These reduced sulfur species (S2 and H2S) can condense to produce elemental sulfur and sulfide, which then undergo hydrologic weathering alongside the basaltic crust for conversion into sulfate deposits widely observed on the martian surface. In addition, the degassed S2 and H2S could also modulate the climate of early Mars by forming a sulfur-rich hazy atmosphere with the potent greenhouse gas, SF6. The latter can be readily produced by reacting the reduced sulfur species with F2, which is also likely emitted from martian magmas.

Our simulation results are also consistent with the observations of igneous graphite in martian meteorites (41). The presence of graphite at mid- to upper-crustal pressures in only evolved magmas introduces the possibility of a secondary graphitic crust on Mars—separate from magmas produced from the graphite-saturated mantle (59, 60)—generated through differentiation of magmas. Furthermore, the pressures at which evolved melts are no longer graphite saturated (~1 kbar 10 km) approximately align with the first of the major seismic discontinuities on Mars (8 to 13 km) (66) and would contribute to a less dense martian crust as observed from the InSight mission (66, 67). Graphite in the martian crust could provide an important reservoir of carbon. Lithospheric foundering, if occurred (68), could cycle this crustal carbon reservoir back to the mantle. This carbon cycling could potentially extend the duration of a CO2-dominated greenhouse gas atmosphere for a habitable ancient Mars.

Magmatically degassed H2S and S2 on early Mars may have induced a hazy atmosphere. Studies on exoplanet atmospheres indicate that even trace concentrations of H2S can be critical in organosulfur aerosol haze formation, especially in CO2-rich atmospheres as assumed on early Mars (43, 69, 70). The inclusion of even low concentrations of H2S in a CO2-rich atmosphere appears to produce diverse and complex sulfur species, such as CH3SH, C2H4S, CS2, and S8, and generate a thicker haze in comparison to H2S-free atmospheres (43, 70). The organosulfur compounds could produce additional COS (43), which also is a minor constituent in our modeled magmatic gases. COS is of particular interest with regard to habitability because of its role as a reactant in the production of diverse sulfur molecules (71, 72) and as a catalyst in the formation of peptides from amino acids (73). In addition, degassed S2 could potentially be readily converted to S8 and contribute to haze formation in the martian atmosphere. However, there is no unanimous conclusion as to the effect of haze on the early martian climate. Scattering caused by S8 aerosols could induce a cooling effect of up to ~20°C (74). Yet, it is possible that a fractal aggregate haze of organic particles could have a strong ultraviolet shielding effect, protecting less stable reduced species from photolysis and possibly allowing for the formation of a dense, reduced greenhouse atmosphere (75). Although not modeled here, halogens (chlorine and fluorine) are among the degassed volatile species on early Mars (14). Condensed S8 could react with degassed F2 to produce SF6, which is a highly potent greenhouse gas >22,000 times more powerful than CO2 (76). Regardless of its specific climatic effect, sulfur degassing likely played a critical role in modulating the climate condition of early Mars and needs to be considered in future paleoclimate models.

Last, our findings may also have important implications for understanding the habitability potential of martian hydrothermal systems. Results of our modeling indicate that the magmatic gases in the martian surface environment share similar reducing capacities as those from the hydrothermal systems in terrestrial submarine environments (Fig. 3A). Noting that magmatic fluids can provide not only essential metabolic sources (77) but also crucial redox interfaces (78) for the diverse microbial communities in submarine hydrothermal systems, we speculate that magmatic gases in martian hydrological settings may also play a critical role in nurturing habitable environments for potential life on early Mars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample selection and determination of their extents of crystallization

Given the importance of redox conditions on degassed and saturated sulfur speciation, it is necessary to highlight the systematic variation in ƒo2 of martian magmatic sources. The most abundant and varied class of martian meteorites are shergottites, which can be subclassified as basaltic, olivine-phyric, augite-rich, or poikilitic and categorized as from a depleted or enriched mantle source (79, 80). Shergottite crystallization ages range from ~0.35 to 2.4 Ga (81, 82) with source ages that span the Pre-Noachian through the Hesperian (~4.2 to 3.3 Ga) (75). Shergottite variance in both composition and age indicates that shergottites formed from a long-lived magmatic source and throughout multiple magmatic systems (80), making shergottite conditions ideal for modeling ancient martian magmatic systems. There is a correlation between shergottite ƒo2 and the nature of the magmatic source, as quantified by the meteoritic La/Yb ratio (40, 80). Accordingly, it has been inferred that shergottites are formed through the mixing of two distinct sources, one enriched and oxidized and the other depleted and reduced (80).

To model degassing as a function of crystallization, we consider the compositions and redox conditions of four shergottites from both the depleted and enriched sources: Y-980459, QUE 94201, NWA 1068, and Los Angeles. These samples were selected on the basis of their petrogenetic relations through rhyolite-MELTS modeling (Fig. 1 and fig. S1). We modeled the liquid lines of descent for both the Y-980459 and NWA 1068 with rhyolite-MELTS Version 1.2.0 (45, 46) (data S1). The initial conditions were set to temperatures at 1540°C and pressures at 1 kbar (data S1). The ƒo2 conditions were set at FMQ-4 and FMQ-3 for Y-980459 and NWA 1068, respectively. We simulated the liquid lines of descent for these meteorite compositions with the “Fractionate Solids” mode in rhyolite-MELTS (45, 46). Our results indicate that the enriched Los Angeles basaltic shergottite falls on the liquid line of descent for NWA 1068, whereas the depleted QUE 94201 basaltic shergottite plots onto the liquid line of descent for Y-980459 (Fig. 1). The rhyolite-MELTS (45, 46) modeling of these meteorites suggests that the composition of the Los Angeles basaltic shergottite characterizes an evolved magmatic composition of the enriched magma source for NWA 1068, and similarly, QUE 94201 represents an evolved melt composition of the depleted magma source of Y-980459. The selected meteorites not only capture a range of major oxide compositions but also exemplify increasing ƒo2 with crystallization.

Using the experimental data for martian melt compositions from (83, 84), we tested the liquidus calculations of rhyolite-MELTS and found that rhyolite-MELTS overestimates the liquidus temperature of martian magmas by ~50° to 125°C (table S1). The olivine-melt geothermometer from (61), however, can predict the experimental liquidus temperatures to within ±35°C. Applying this geothermometer, we calculated the liquid temperatures of the selected samples to be ~1100° to 1500°C at 5 kbars. The fraction of the residual liquid (F) was estimated with the following equation

F=TmeltTsolTliqTsol (4)

where Tsol is the approximate temperature of the solidus (950°C), Tmelt is the temperature of the meteorite obtained by the geothermometer, and Tliq is the temperature of the liquidus (i.e., the temperature received from the geothermometer for Y-980459 or NWA 1068; data S1). Using Eq. 4, we determined that QUE 94201 was produced through ~55% crystallization (F = 0.45) and Los Angeles formed from ~70% crystallization (F = 0.30).

Magmatic volatile compositions

The abundance of volatiles in the martian mantle and magmas remains highly uncertain. Considering the assumption of a graphite-saturated mantle (60, 85), we used an existing model to determine magmatic carbon content at graphite saturation that is calibrated to reduced martian basalts (59). The only magma assumed to be generated from the graphite-saturated martian mantle is that equivalent to Y-980459 (86). Although representative of a primitive, enriched magma, NWA 1068 is not considered to be mantle derived (86). When applying the same model to NWA 1068, the relatively oxidized conditions of NWA 1068 yield unrealistically high carbon contents for the differentiated Los Angeles composition. Therefore, the carbon content determined for Y-980459 was applied to both the depleted and enriched magmas. Hydrogen and sulfur volatiles were considered highly incompatible, so the primary magma volatile compositions were calculated with the assumption of 10% partial melting (49), whereas evolved compositions were further concentrated in incompatible volatile elements via their calculated extents of crystallization (data S1). There are currently no rigorous constraints on the H2O composition of the martian mantle and predictions for the shergottite mantle source range from nearly anhydrous to >500 ppm H2O (5057). An intermediate value of 150 ppm H2O was selected as the baseline for our calculations, but we investigated a range of mantle H2O from 30 to 300 ppm. As with graphite, the martian mantle was assumed to be sulfide saturated with primary magmas sufficiently consuming all sulfur in the mantle (i.e., below sulfide saturation) and is estimated to contain <700 to 1000 ppm S (58). To maintain this assumption of sulfide-undersaturated primary magmas, we use a mantle with 500 ppm S as the reference point but the test mantle sulfur content ranging from 300 to 1000 ppm (58, 62).

Magma and gas equilibrium calculation model

The MAGEC program is a thermodynamic modeling software that highlights gas-melt interactions and is applicable to both magmatic degassing and crystallization (35, 42). The redox/chemical equations and mass balance relationships are concurrently solved at variable P-T conditions and an inputted ƒo2, buffered through redox equations as the system progresses (35). Currently, MAGEC is the only available petrological tool that can simulate C-H-O-S degassing for melts with variable compositions at the saturation of graphite and sulfide. Depending on the selected solubility models and graphite/sulfide saturation models, the modeling results in the earlier version of MAGEC can have intrinsic uncertainties of up to ~20% (35). Error propagations were not included in the MAGEC code due to the expensive computational cost. To minimize the intrinsic uncertainties, we used the updated MAGEC with recently calibrated models for Fe- and S-redox equilibria (42) and graphite-saturation in mafic melts (59). As demonstrated previously (35, 42), the validity of MAGEC has been benchmarked against existing solubility experiments, mid-ocean ridge basalts, and alkaline melt inclusions from Canary Islands.

To simulate degassing and crystallization processes, we used the major element compositions of the four meteorites with different extents of crystallization and modeled polybaric degassing along the melt adiabat for the calculated initial liquidus temperatures (data S1 to S6). According to the seismic constraints from InSight (66), the average thickness (~50 km) of the martian crust indicates a pressure of ~5 kbars at the base of the crust. Estimates for the martian paleoatmosphere generally range from ~0.1 to 1 bar with a possible lower limit at ~0.01 bars (4). Thus, we considered a degassing pressure range from 5 kbars to 0.01 bars. The output from the MAGEC software contains volatile compositions of the melt (H2, H2O, CO, CO2, CH4, S2−, and S6+) and the gas (H2, H2O, CO, CO2, CH4, H2, SO2, S2, COS, and O2); the ƒo2 after degassing; the activities of C0, S2−, and S6+; and the extent of degassing.

Acknowledgments

We thank the editor for the editorial handling, as well as the reviewers for constructive comments that improved the clarity of our manuscript and motivated us to extend the implications of our modeling results. We also appreciate informal review comments provided by T. Goudge after manuscript revision. This is The University of Texas Center for Planetary Systems Habitability contribution #0087.

Funding: This work was supported by The University of Texas Center for Planetary Systems Habitability (L.G.B. and C.S.), National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under grant no. DGE 2137420 (L.G.B.), and Heising-Simons Foundation (C.S.).

Author contributions: Conceptualization: C.S. and L.G.B. Methodology: C.S. and L.G.B. Investigation: L.G.B. Visualization: L.G.B. Supervision: C.S. Writing—original draft: L.G.B. Writing—review and editing: L.G.B. and C.S.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. The MAGEC software was downloaded from the Texas Data Repository (https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/LIKH3A). Input and output files are also stored in the Texas Data Repository (https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/ALOQFC).

Supplementary Materials

The PDF file includes:

Figs. S1 to S5

Table S1

Legends for data S1 to S6

sciadv.adr9635_sm.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Other Supplementary Material for this manuscript includes the following:

Data S1 to S6

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  • 1.Wordsworth R. D., The climate of early Mars. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 44, 381–408 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ramirez R. M., Craddock R. A., The geological and climatological case for a warmer and wetter early Mars. Nat. Geosci. 11, 230–237 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Thomas T. B., Hu R., Lo D. Y., Constraints on the size and composition of the ancient Martian atmosphere from coupled CO2–N2–Ar isotopic evolution models. Planet. Sci. J. 4, 41 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kite E. S., Geologic constraints on early Mars climate. Space Sci. Rev. 215, 10 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kite E. S., Conway S., Geological evidence for multiple climate transitions on Early Mars. Nat. Geosci. 17, 10–19 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Edwards C. S., Ehlmann B. L., Carbon sequestration on Mars. Geology 43, 863–866 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Warren A. O., Kite E. S., Williams J.-P., Horgan B., Through the thick and thin: New constraints on Mars paleopressure history 3.8–4 Ga from small exhumed craters. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 124, 2793–2818 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Roach L. H., Mustard J. F., Lane M. D., Bishop J. L., Murchie S. L., Diagenetic haematite and sulfate assemblages in Valles Marineris. Icarus 207, 659–674 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nachon M., Clegg S. M., Mangold N., Schröder S., Kah L. C., Dromart G., Ollila A., Johnson J. R., Oehler D. Z., Bridges J. C., Le Mouélic S., Forni O., Wiens R. C., Anderson R. B., Blaney D. L., Bell J. F., Clark B., Cousin A., Dyar M. D., Ehlmann B., Fabre C., Gasnault O., Grotzinger J., Lasue J., Lewin E., Léveillé R., McLennan S., Maurice S., Meslin P.-Y., Rapin W., Rice M., Squyres S. W., Stack K., Sumner D. Y., Vaniman D., Wellington D., Calcium sulfate veins characterized by ChemCam/curiosity at gale crater, Mars. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 119, 1991–2016 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Flahaut J., Carter J., Poulet F., Bibring J.-P., Van Westrenen W., Davies G. R., Murchie S. L., Embedded clays and sulfates in Meridiani Planum, Mars. Icarus 248, 269–288 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ehlmann B. L., Swayze G. A., Milliken R. E., Mustard J. F., Clark R. N., Murchie S. L., Breit G. N., Wray J. J., Gondet B., Poulet F., Carter J., Calvin W. M., Benzel W. M., Seelos K. D., Discovery of alunite in Cross crater, Terra Sirenum, Mars: Evidence for acidic, sulfurous waters. Am. Mineral. 101, 1527–1542 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gooding J. L., Wentworth S. J., Zolensky M. E., Aqueous alteration of the Nakhla meteorite. Meteoritics 26, 135–143 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wentworth S. J., Gooding J. L., Carbonates and sulfates in the Chassigny meteorite: Further evidence for aqueous chemistry on the SNC parent planet. Meteoritics 29, 860–863 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Filiberto J., Baratoux D., Beaty D., Breuer D., Farcy B. J., Grott M., Jones J. H., Kiefer W. S., Mane P., McCubbin F. M., Schwenzer S. P., A review of volatiles in the Martian interior. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 51, 1935–1958 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.H. B. Franz, P. L. King, F. Gaillard, “Sulfur on Mars from the atmosphere to the core” in Volatiles in the Martian Crust (Elsevier, 2019), pp. 119–183. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Flahaut J., Quantin C., Allemand P., Thomas P., Le Deit L., Identification, distribution and possible origins of sulfates in Capri Chasma (Mars), inferred from CRISM data. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 115, 2009JE003566 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Franz H. B., Kim S.-T., Farquhar J., Day J. M. D., Economos R. C., McKeegan K. D., Schmitt A. K., Irving A. J., Hoek J., Dottin J., Isotopic links between atmospheric chemistry and the deep sulphur cycle on Mars. Nature 508, 364–368 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Halevy I., Zuber M. T., Schrag D. P., A sulfur dioxide climate feedback on early Mars. Science 318, 1903–1907 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Halevy I., Head J. W. III, Episodic warming of early Mars by punctuated volcanism. Nat. Geosci. 7, 865–868 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Johnson S. S., Pavlov A. A., Mischna M. A., Fate of SO2 in the ancient Martian atmosphere: Implications for transient greenhouse warming. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 114, E11011 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gaillard F., Scaillet B., The sulfur content of volcanic gases on Mars. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 279, 34–43 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gaillard F., Michalski J., Berger G., McLennan S. M., Scaillet B., Geochemical reservoirs and timing of sulfur cycling on Mars. Space Sci. Rev. 174, 251–300 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bishop J. L., Perry K. A., Darby Dyar M., Bristow T. F., Blake D. F., Brown A. J., Peel S. E., Coordinated spectral and XRD analyses of magnesite-nontronite-forsterite mixtures and implications for carbonates on Mars: Magnesite-nontronite-forsterite mixtures. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 118, 635–650 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ehlmann B. L., Mustard J. F., Murchie S. L., Poulet F., Bishop J. L., Brown A. J., Calvin W. M., Clark R. N., Marais D. J. D., Milliken R. E., Roach L. H., Roush T. L., Swayze G. A., Wray J. J., Orbital identification of carbonate-bearing rocks on Mars. Science 322, 1828–1832 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ehlmann B. L., Mustard J. F., Swayze G. A., Clark R. N., Bishop J. L., Poulet F., Des Marais D. J., Roach L. H., Milliken R. E., Wray J. J., Barnouin-Jha O., Murchie S. L., Identification of hydrated silicate minerals on Mars using MRO-CRISM: Geologic context near Nili Fossae and implications for aqueous alteration. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 114, E00D08 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Goudge T. A., Mustard J. F., Head J. W., Fassett C. I., Wiseman S. M., Assessing the mineralogy of the watershed and fan deposits of the Jezero crater paleolake system, Mars: Jezero Paleolake System Mineralogy. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 120, 775–808 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Clavé E., Benzerara K., Meslin P.-Y., Forni O., Royer C., Mandon L., Beck P., Quantin-Nataf C., Beyssac O., Cousin A., Bousquet B., Wiens R. C., Maurice S., Dehouck E., Schröder S., Gasnault O., Mangold N., Dromart G., Bosak T., Bernard S., Udry A., Anderson R. B., Arana G., Brown A. J., Castro K., Clegg S. M., Cloutis E., Fairén A. G., Flannery D. T., Gasda P. J., Johnson J. R., Lasue J., Lopez-Reyes G., Madariaga J. M., Manrique J. A., Le Mouélic S., Núñez J. I., Ollila A. M., Pilleri P., Pilorget C., Pinet P., Poulet F., Veneranda M., Wolf Z. U., the SuperCam team , Carbonate detection with SuperCam in igneous rocks on the floor of Jezero Crater, Mars. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 128, e2022JE007463 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Michalski J. R., Niles P. B., Deep crustal carbonate rocks exposed by meteor impact on Mars. Nat. Geosci. 3, 751–755 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sutter B., Archer P. D., Niles P. B., Ming D. W., Hamara D., Boynton W. V., Organic carbon and Ca-rich carbonate detections in soils of the Northern plains, Mars: Evaluation of unreported data from the Mars Phoenix Scout’s Thermal Evolved Gas Analyzer (TEGA). J. Geophys. Res. Planets 129, e2024JE008335 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Murchie S. L., Mustard J. F., Ehlmann B. L., Milliken R. E., Bishop J. L., McKeown N. K., Noe Dobrea E. Z., Seelos F. P., Buczkowski D. L., Wiseman S. M., Arvidson R. E., Wray J. J., Swayze G., Clark R. N., Des Marais D. J., McEwen A. S., Bibring J.-P., A synthesis of Martian aqueous mineralogy after 1 Mars year of observations from the Mars reconnaissance orbiter. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 114, E00D06 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sheppard R. Y., Loizeau D., Fraeman A. A., Rampe E. B., Pilorget C., Bibring J.-P., Mg-sulfate can spectrally obscure siderite: Implications for martian surface carbonates. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 12, 1549242 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu Y., Tice M. M., Schmidt M. E., Treiman A. H., Kizovski T. V., Hurowitz J. A., Allwood A. C., Henneke J., Pedersen D. A. K., VanBommel S. J., Jones M. W. M., Knight A. L., Orenstein B. J., Clark B. C., Elam W. T., Heirwegh C. M., Barber T., Beegle L. W., Benzerara K., Bernard S., Beyssac O., Bosak T., Brown A. J., Cardarelli E. L., Catling D. C., Christian J. R., Cloutis E. A., Cohen B. A., Davidoff S., Fairén A. G., Farley K. A., Flannery D. T., Galvin A., Grotzinger J. P., Gupta S., Hall J., Herd C. D. K., Hickman-Lewis K., Hodyss R. P., Horgan B. H. N., Johnson J. R., Jørgensen J. L., Kah L. C., Maki J. N., Mandon L., Mangold N., McCubbin F. M., McLennan S. M., Moore K., Nachon M., Nemere P., Nothdurft L. D., Núñez J. I., O’Neil L., Quantin-Nataf C. M., Sautter V., Shuster D. L., Siebach K. L., Simon J. I., Sinclair K. P., Stack K. M., Steele A., Tarnas J. D., Tosca N. J., Uckert K., Udry A., Wade L. A., Weiss B. P., Wiens R. C., Williford K. H., Zorzano M.-P., An olivine cumulate outcrop on the floor of Jezero crater, Mars. Science 377, 1513–1519 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Payré V., Salvatore M. R., Edwards C. S., An evolved early crust exposed on Mars revealed through spectroscopy. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL099639 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Christensen P. R., McSween H. Y., Bandfield J. L., Ruff S. W., Rogers A. D., Hamilton V. E., Gorelick N., Wyatt M. B., Jakosky B. M., Kieffer H. H., Malin M. C., Moersch J. E., Evidence for magmatic evolution and diversity on Mars from infrared observations. Nature 436, 504–509 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sun C., Lee C.-T. A., Redox evolution of crystallizing magmas with C-H-O-S volatiles and its implications for atmospheric oxygenation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 338, 302–321 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Carmichael I. S. E., The redox states of basic and silicic magmas: A reflection of their source regions? Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 106, 129–141 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lee C.-T. A., Luffi P., Le Roux V., Dasgupta R., Albaréde F., Leeman W. P., The redox state of arc mantle using Zn/Fe systematics. Nature 468, 681–685 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tang M., Erdman M., Eldridge G., Lee C.-T. A., The redox “filter” beneath magmatic orogens and the formation of continental crust. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar4444 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Peslier A. H., Hnatyshin D., Herd C. D. K., Walton E. L., Brandon A. D., Lapen T. J., Shafer J. T., Crystallization, melt inclusion, and redox history of a Martian meteorite: Olivine-phyric shergottite Larkman Nunatak 06319. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 4543–4576 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Castle N., Herd C. D. K., Experimental petrology of the Tissint meteorite: Redox estimates, crystallization curves, and evaluation of petrogenetic models. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 52, 125–146 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Steele A., McCubbin F. M., Fries M., Kater L., Boctor N. Z., Fogel M. L., Conrad P. G., Glamoclija M., Spencer M., Morrow A. L., Hammond M. R., Zare R. N., Vicenzi E. P., Siljeström S., Bowden R., Herd C. D. K., Mysen B. O., Shirey S. B., Amundsen H. E. F., Treiman A. H., Bullock E. S., Jull A. J. T., A reduced organic carbon component in Martian Basalts. Science 337, 212–215 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sun C., Yao L., Redox equilibria of iron in low- to high-silica melts: A simple model and its applications to C-H-O-S degassing. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 638, 118742 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.He C., Hörst S. M., Lewis N. K., Yu X., Moses J. I., McGuiggan P., Marley M. S., Kempton E. M.-R., Moran S. E., Morley C. V., Vuitton V., Sulfur-driven haze formation in warm CO2-rich exoplanet atmospheres. Nat. Astron. 4, 986–993 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Filiberto J., Geochemistry of Martian basalts with constraints on magma genesis. Chem. Geol. 466, 1–14 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gualda G. A. R., Ghiorso M. S., Lemons R. V., Carley T. L., Rhyolite-MELTS: A modified calibration of MELTS optimized for silica-rich, Fluid-bearing magmatic systems. J. Petrol. 53, 875–890 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ghiorso M. S., Gualda G. A. R., An H2O–CO2 mixed fluid saturation model compatible with rhyolite-MELTS. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 169, 53 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nicklas R. W., Day J. M. D., Vaci Z., Udry A., Liu Y., Tait K. T., Uniform oxygen fugacity of shergottite mantle sources and an oxidized martian lithosphere. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 564, 116876 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Herd C. D. K., Insights into the redox history of the NWA 1068/1110 martian basalt from mineral equilibria and vanadium oxybarometry. Am. Mineral. 91, 1616–1627 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Stolper E., McSween H. Y., Petrology and origin of the shergottite meteorites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 43, 1475–1498 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Usui T., Alexander C. M. O., Wang J., Simon J. I., Jones J. H., Origin of water and mantle–crust interactions on Mars inferred from hydrogen isotopes and volatile element abundances of olivine-hosted melt inclusions of primitive shergottites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 357-358, 119–129 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Filiberto J., Gross J., McCubbin F. M., Constraints on the water, chlorine, and fluorine content of the Martian mantle. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 51, 2023–2035 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.McCubbin F. M., Hauri E. H., Elardo S. M., Vander Kaaden K. E., Wang J., Shearer C. K., Hydrous melting of the martian mantle produced both depleted and enriched shergottites. Geology 40, 683–686 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.McCubbin F. M., Boyce J. W., Srinivasan P., Santos A. R., Elardo S. M., Filiberto J., Steele A., Shearer C. K., Heterogeneous distribution of H2O in the Martian interior: Implications for the abundance of H2O in depleted and enriched mantle sources. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 51, 2036–2060 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wänke H., Dreibus G., Chemistry and accretion history of Mars. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 349, 285–293 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Withers A. C., Hirschmann M. M., Tenner T. J., The effect of Fe on olivine H2O storage capacity: Consequences for H2O in the martian mantle. Am. Mineral. 96, 1039–1053 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mysen B. O., Virgo D., Popp R. K., Bertka C. M., The role of H 2 O in Martian magmatic systems. Am. Mineral. 83, 942–946 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hu S., Lin Y., Zhang J., Hao J., Yamaguchi A., Zhang T., Yang W., Changela H., Volatiles in the martian crust and mantle: Clues from the NWA 6162 shergottite. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 530, 115902 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ding S., Dasgupta R., Lee C.-T. A., Wadhwa M., New bulk sulfur measurements of Martian meteorites and modeling the fate of sulfur during melting and crystallization – Implications for sulfur transfer from Martian mantle to crust–atmosphere system. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 409, 157–167 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Li Y., Dasgupta R., Tsuno K., Carbon contents in reduced basalts at graphite saturation: Implications for the degassing of Mars, Mercury, and the Moon. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 122, 1300–1320 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hirschmann M. M., Withers A. C., Ventilation of CO2 from a reduced mantle and consequences for the early Martian greenhouse. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 270, 147–155 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sun C., Dasgupta R., Thermobarometry of CO2-rich, silica-undersaturated melts constrains cratonic lithosphere thinning through time in areas of kimberlitic magmatism. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 550, 116549 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang Z., Becker H., Chalcophile elements in Martian meteorites indicate low sulfur content in the Martian interior and a volatile element-depleted late veneer. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 463, 56–68 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lorand J.-P., Chevrier V., Sautter V., Sulfide mineralogy and redox conditions in some shergottites. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 40, 1257–1272 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 64.J. A. Berger, S. J. VanBommel, P. L. King, W. E. Dietrich, R. Gellert, L. M. Thompson, A. S. Yen, E. S. Kite, A. R. Vasavada, J. V. Clark, A. B. Bryk, A. C. Cowart, R. M. E. Williams, S. L. Simpson, H. B. Franz, C. D. O’Connell-Cooper, M. A. McCraig, A. A. Fraeman, J. R. Christian, A. L. Knight, N. I. Boyd, D. M. Fey, B. C. Clark, C. H. House, “Native sulfide discovered by Curiosity in Gediz Vallis, Gale Crater, Mars: APXS results and interpretation,” in 56th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (USRA, 2025), vol. 1208. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dehouck E., Chevrier V., Gaudin A., Mangold N., Mathé P.-E., Rochette P., Evaluating the role of sulfide-weathering in the formation of sulfates or carbonates on Mars. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 90, 47–63 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wieczorek M. A., Broquet A., McLennan S. M., Rivoldini A., Golombek M., Antonangeli D., Beghein C., Giardini D., Gudkova T., Gyalay S., Johnson C. L., Joshi R., Kim D., King S. D., Knapmeyer-Endrun B., Lognonné P., Michaut C., Mittelholz A., Nimmo F., Ojha L., Panning M. P., Plesa A., Siegler M. A., Smrekar S. E., Spohn T., Banerdt W. B., InSight constraints on the global character of the Martian crust. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 127, e2022JE007298 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Knapmeyer-Endrun B., Panning M. P., Bissig F., Joshi R., Khan A., Kim D., Lekić V., Tauzin B., Tharimena S., Plasman M., Compaire N., Garcia R. F., Margerin L., Schimmel M., Stutzmann É., Schmerr N., Bozdağ E., Plesa A.-C., Wieczorek M. A., Broquet A., Antonangeli D., McLennan S. M., Samuel H., Michaut C., Pan L., Smrekar S. E., Johnson C. L., Brinkman N., Mittelholz A., Rivoldini A., Davis P. M., Lognonné P., Pinot B., Scholz J.-R., Stähler S., Knapmeyer M., van Driel M., Giardini D., Banerdt W. B., Thickness and structure of the martian crust from InSight seismic data. Science 373, 438–443 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Michalski J. R., Deanne Rogers A., Edwards C. S., Cowart A., Xiao L., Diverse volcanism and crustal recycling on early Mars. Nat. Astron. 8, 456–462 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Reed N. W., Wing B. A., Tolbert M. A., Browne E. C., Trace H2S promotes organic aerosol production and organosulfur compound formation in archean analog haze photochemistry experiments. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2021GL097032 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hu R., Seager S., Bains W., Photochemistry in terrestrial exoplanet atmospheres. II. H2S and SO2 photochemistry in anoxic atmopsheres. Astrophys. J. 769, 6 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sze N. D., Ko M. K. W., Photochemistry of COS, CS2, CH3SCH3 and H2S: Implications for the atmospheric sulfur cycle. Atmos. Environ. 14, 1223–1239 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ferm R. J., The chemistry of carbonyl sulfide. Chem. Rev. 57, 621–640 (1957). [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Leman L., Orgel L., Ghadiri M. R., Carbonyl sulfide-mediated prebiotic formation of peptides. Science 306, 283–286 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Tian F., Claire M. W., Haqq-Misra J. D., Smith M., Crisp D. C., Catling D., Zahnle K., Kasting J. F., Photochemical and climate consequences of sulfur outgassing on early Mars. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 295, 412–418 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wolf E. T., Toon O. B., Fractal organic hazes provided an ultraviolet shield for early Earth. Science 328, 1266–1268 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Nouger, P. J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, C. A. Johnson, “Climate change 2001: The scientific basis” (IPCC, 2001).
  • 77.Früh-Green G. L., Kelley D. S., Lilley M. D., Cannat M., Chavagnac V., Baross J. A., Diversity of magmatism, hydrothermal processes and microbial interactions at mid-ocean ridges. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 852–871 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Russell M. J., Hall A. J., The emergence of life from iron monosulphide bubbles at a submarine hydrothermal redox and pH front. J. Geol. Soc. London 154, 377–402 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Herd C. D. K., Walton E. L., Agee C. B., Muttik N., Ziegler K., Shearer C. K., Bell A. S., Santos A. R., Burger P. V., Simon J. I., Tappa M. J., McCubbin F. M., Gattacceca J., Lagroix F., Sanborn M. E., Yin Q.-Z., Cassata W. S., Borg L. E., Lindvall R. E., Kruijer T. S., Brennecka G. A., Kleine T., Nishiizumi K., Caffee M. W., The Northwest Africa 8159 Martian meteorite: Expanding the Martian sample suite to the early Amazonian. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 218, 1–26 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Udry A., Howarth G. H., Herd C. D. K., Day J. M. D., Lapen T. J., Filiberto J., What Martian meteorites reveal about the interior and surface of Mars. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 125, e2020JE006523 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tait K. T., Day J. M. D., Chondritic late accretion to Mars and the nature of shergottite reservoirs. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 494, 99–108 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Lapen T. J., Righter M., Brandon A. D., Debaille V., Beard B. L., Shafer J. T., Peslier A. H., A younger age for ALH84001 and its geochemical link to shergottite sources in Mars. Science 328, 347–351 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Filiberto J., Treiman A. H., Le L., Crystallization experiments on a Gusev Adirondack basalt composition. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 43, 1137–1146 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mussel White D. S., Dalton H. A., Kiefer W. S., Treiman A. H., Experimental petrology of the basaltic shergottite Yamato-980459: Implications for the thermal structure of the Martian mantle. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 41, 1271–1290 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Righter K., Yang H., Costin G., Downs R. T., Oxygen fugacity in the Martian mantle controlled by carbon: New constraints from the nakhlite MIL 03346. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 43, 1709–1723 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Filiberto J., Dasgupta R., Fe2+–Mg partitioning between olivine and basaltic melts: Applications to genesis of olivine-phyric shergottites and conditions of melting in the Martian interior. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 304, 527–537 (2011). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figs. S1 to S5

Table S1

Legends for data S1 to S6

sciadv.adr9635_sm.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Data S1 to S6


Articles from Science Advances are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Advancement of Science

RESOURCES