Skip to main content
Kidney360 logoLink to Kidney360
. 2025 Apr 1;6(8):1328–1337. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000797

Homocitrulline Is Associated with Cardiovascular Outcomes in Nondialysis Patients with CKD

Solène M Laville 1,2, Stéphane Jaisson 3, Philippe Gillery 3, Anaïs Okwieka 3, Natalia Alencar de Pinho 4, Christian Combe 5, Nicolas Mansencal 4,6, Ziad A Massy 4,7,8, Sophie Liabeuf 1,2,, on behalf of the CKD-REIN study collaborators
PMCID: PMC12407145  PMID: 40168087

Visual Abstract

graphic file with name kidney360-6-1328-g001.jpg

Keywords: cardiovascular, cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular events, CKD, kidney failure

Abstract

Key Points

  • In nondialysis CKD, baseline serum homocitrulline was positively and independently linked to age, low eGFR, urea, anemia, and diuretics.

  • A higher serum homocitrulline concentration was associated with an elevated risk of major adverse cardiovascular event and all-cause mortality rate.

  • Targeting elevated levels of protein carbamylation may be a way of modifying the cardiovascular risk in patients with CKD.

Background

Protein carbamylation contributes to an increase in the cardiovascular risk in certain patient populations (e.g., in patients with CKD because of elevated urea concentrations). Homocitrulline (HCit) is a biomarker of overall protein carbamylation. In a study of a large cohort of nondialysis patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CKD and an eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, we sought to determine whether the serum HCit concentration was associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality.

Methods

CKD-renal epidemiology and information network is a prospective cohort of patients with CKD and an eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The baseline serum HCit concentration was centrally measured. The 2195 patients included in the analysis were divided into tertile (T) groups according to the baseline HCit concentration (T1 <292, T2=[292–429], and T3 ≥430 µmol/mol lysine). Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios for the first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and death before KRT.

Results

Among the 2195 included patients, the median age was 68 years and the mean eGFR was 34.6 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The median (interquartile range) serum HCit was 352 (266–481) µmol/mol lysine. The HCit concentration was correlated with the eGFR (r=−0.57) and the urea concentrations (r=0.73). In an adjusted linear regression model, the HCit concentration was independently and positively associated with age, eGFR decrease, urea, anemia, baseline prescription of diuretics, and negatively associated with male sex and an elevated urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio. The adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for MACEs as a function of the baseline HCit concentration was 1.32 (0.96 to 1.84) for T2 and 1.63 (1.16 to 2.30) for T3, compared with T1. The risk of death before KRT as a function of the baseline serum HCit concentration was 2.09 (1.45 to 3.03) for T3 and 1.48 (1.04 to 2.11) for T2, compared with T1.

Conclusions

Our analysis of a large cohort of patients with CKD demonstrated that the serum HCit concentration was associated with a greater likelihood of a MACE and death. To confirm causality, further studies of therapeutic interventions for preventing or reducing carbamylation are now warranted.

Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:

NCT03381950.

Introduction

In the human body, proteins undergo various chemical reactions that can change their functional properties. Post-translational modifications can influence a protein's charge, structure, and function under various physiologic and pathologic conditions.1 Protein carbamylation is a nonenzymatic, post-translational modification that occurs when cyanate (mostly generated from the breakdown of urea) reacts spontaneously with the proteins' primary amino groups. Depending on the role of the protein involved, the resulting conformational change may affect cell functions. The serum concentration of homocitrulline (HCit), an amino acid residue produced by the carbamylation of the lysine residue on an ε-NH2 side chain, is a validated marker of protein carbamylation.2,3

Greater formation of carbamylation-derived products is observed in certain disease settings and particularly in CKD, due to the elevated blood urea concentration.4 We have previously reported that the serum urea concentration is a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes independently of other cardiovascular risk factors (including the eGFR).5 Urea may have direct and/or indirect toxic effects through the carbamylation process. It is therefore important to characterize the role of protein carbamylation in patients with CKD because this process might be a valuable therapeutic target.6

The literature data show that circulating markers of carbamylation are associated with the mortality rate and cardiovascular outcomes in patients on hemodialysis.79 Furthermore, carbamylated albumin was shown to be an independent risk factor for CKD progression and kidney failure in a predialysis population.10,11 The results of preclinical studies suggest that carbamylation may have a role in the development of cardiovascular complications by altering lipoproteins, circulating proteins (e.g., fibrinogen), and extracellular matrix components (e.g., collagens, proteoglycans, and fibronectin).12 For instance, protein carbamylation accentuated the calcification of human vascular smooth muscle cells by downregulating the expression of a key enzyme (ectonucleotide pyrophosphate/phosphodiesterase 1) involved in the production of pyrophosphate—a powerful inhibitor of ectopic calcification13 and increased stiffness in elastic fibers.14 Given that patients with CKD have an elevated cardiovascular risk even before the onset of kidney failure, we decided to evaluate the association between HCit and the cardiovascular risk in a nondialysis CKD population.

The objectives of this study were therefore to (1) describe serum HCit concentrations in nondialysis CKD patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CKD and an eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, (2) identify factors associated with the serum HCit concentration, and (3) determine whether the serum HCit concentration is associated with serious adverse outcomes, i.e., fatal or nonfatal major cardiovascular events, and death before KRT (defined as kidney transplantation or the initiation of long-term dialysis therapy) after adjustment for the eGFR and other risk factors.

Methods

The results of this cohort study were reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.15

Study Design and Participants

CKD-renal epidemiology and information network (REIN) is a prospective cohort study conducted in 40 nephrology outpatient facilities, constituting a representative, nationwide sample of nephrology practices in France. The study protocol has been described in detail elsewhere.16 The main inclusion criteria were 18 years or older, a confirmed diagnosis of moderate or advanced CKD (stages 2–5), and no KRT. Between July 2013 and April 2016, 3033 patients were recruited during a routine nephrology outpatient visit and were followed for up to 5 years. Outpatient recruitment aimed to avoid the inclusion of participants with acute conditions (e.g., AKI and gastrointestinal hemorrhage) at the time of inclusion. Furthermore, all patients were on stable background therapy. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (reference: IRB00003888) and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03381950). The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

For the purposes of the present analysis, we excluded patients with missing data for the serum HCit or urea concentration at baseline or who had an aberrant serum urea value (i.e., <2.5 or >100 mmol/L). To limit the effects of nonrenal factors on HCit concentrations, patients who were on corticosteroids or had a history of metastatic cancer were excluded (Supplemental Figure 1). Hence, a total of 2195 patients were included in the present analysis.

Study Data

Trained clinical research associates (CRAs) collected data from patient interviews and medical records at baseline and then annually. Sociodemographic data (such as age, sex, and smoking status) and medical history (for hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease [CVD], or AKI) were recorded at baseline (for the definitions of the variables, see Supplemental Table 1). BP was measured at baseline, as were height and weight (for calculation of the body mass index). Patients were asked to bring all their drug prescriptions for the preceding 3 months to the enrollment visit. The CRAs used an electronic case report form (linked to the international Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical classification) to enter standardized drug codes.

All patients were prescribed a set of standard blood and urine tests (as recommended by the French health authorities for routine CKD care), with a sample to be collected at their usual medical laboratory. The GFR was estimated using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine equation.17 The urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) was either measured directly or estimated using an equation based on proteinuria values.18 In addition, serum samples were collected at the time of patient's enrollment, stored at 4°C, and aliquoted within 6 hours, without further processing. These samples were then stored at −80°C at the Biobanque de Picardie biological resource center (French national reference: BB-0033-00017) in Amiens-Picardie University Medical Center (Amiens, France). Serum samples were assayed for urea and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in a central laboratory.

Determination of the HCit Concentration

The level of protein carbamylation in the biologic resource center's samples was assessed by measuring the total serum HCit concentration with a previously described liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.19 The results were expressed in µmol of HCit per mol lysine (µmol/mol lysine). The reference range for the serum HCit concentration in the general population was 100–170 µmol/mol lysine.20

Study Outcomes

Cardiovascular events, identified from medical records, hospital reports, and/or the annual patient interview, were assessed according to the Cardiovascular and Stroke Endpoint Definitions for Clinical Trials.21 The primary end point was the occurrence of a first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospital admission for heart failure. The secondary outcomes included the first instance of fatal or nonfatal CVD (whether atheromatous or nonatheromatous), the first instance of fatal or nonfatal atheromatous CVD, the first instance of fatal or nonfatal nonatheromatous CVD, and all-cause deaths (Supplemental Table 2). Only events occurring before KRT were considered.

Deaths before KRT were identified from death certificates, hospital records, reported by family members at the annual follow-up visit, and/or by linkage with the national death registry. Preemptive kidney transplantation and the initiation of long-term dialysis therapy were identified from medical records and/or by linking to the French National Kidney Failure Registry.22

Patients were censored at the date of the competing event (KRT and/or noncardiovascular death, depending on the outcome), the end of their 5-year follow-up period, or if they were lost to follow-up.

Statistical Analysis

The participants' serum HCit concentrations were divided into tertiles (T1 <292, T2 [292–429], T3 ≥430 µmol/mol lysine). The baseline characteristics were described for the overall population (N=2195) and for HCit tertile subgroups. Spearman coefficient or Pearson coefficient was calculated to estimate the strength of the correlation between HCit and certain other biochemical variables (eGFR and serum levels of urea, hs-CRP, and albumin). Multivariable linear regressions (based on sociodemographic variables, clinical variables, and prescription drugs) were used to estimate independent associations with the serum HCit concentration (expressed as a nonstandardized coefficient [95% confidence interval (CI)]). The selection of variables for inclusion in multivariable models was based on a literature review and a P value < 0.05 in a univariable analysis.

Incidence rates (95% CI) for each event were computed as a function of the HCit concentration. For each outcome studied, we used cause-specific Cox models to estimate the crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs, 95% CI) for the association with the HCit concentration (in tertiles). For each outcome, HRs were adjusted for relevant demographic variables and baseline comorbidities that had been preselected in a literature review. Risks associated with HCit were adjusted for age at baseline, sex, smoking status, baseline eGFR, natural log-transformed uACR, a binary variable indicating whether or not the uACR had been estimated from the proteinuria value, body mass index, diabetes, systolic BP, a history of CVD, anemia, serum albumin, serum hs-CRP (natural log-transformed), and prescriptions of diuretics, statins, and antithrombotic agents at baseline. As a significant interaction between sex and eGFR was previously identified in the modeling of atheromatous CVD risk,23 this interaction was accounted for in our atheromatous CVD risk model. Each model's validity (according to the proportional hazards assumption) was checked by testing the Schoenfeld residuals. We used penalized splines in fully adjusted Cox models to represent the functional relationship between serum HCit and the CVD risk or mortality.

Missing covariate data were managed by multivariate imputation by chained equations.24 By using the multivariate imputation by chained equations package in R statistical software, we imputed 30 datasets (20 iterations). All covariates present in the Cox models and the baseline serum bicarbonate were included in the imputation model. Fitted Cox models were generated for each dataset, and pooled regression coefficients were obtained using Rubin's rules. All statistical analyses were performed with R software (version 4.4.0).25

Results

Characteristics of the Study Population at Baseline

Of the 3033 patients in the CKD-REIN cohort, 2195 were included in the present analysis (Supplemental Figure 1). The median age was 68 (60–76), and the mean (SD) eGFR was 34.6 (13.3) ml/min per 1.73 m2; 53% of the patients had a history of CVD, 42% had a history of diabetes, and 39% had a history of anemia (Table 1). The median (interquartile range) serum HCit concentration was 352 (266–481) µmol/mol lysine, which was twice the upper boundary of the reference range. Overall, the serum HCit concentrations increased with the CKD stage (Figure 1). At baseline and compared with patients in HCit T1 and T2, patients in T3 were older and more likely to have a history of CVD, a lower eGFR, and higher serum urea and phosphate concentrations. However, patients in T1 were more likely to be male and had a higher prevalence of diabetes, compared with patients in T2 or T3. The serum HCit concentration was significantly and negatively correlated with the eGFR (r=−0.57; P < 0.001) and significantly and positively correlated with the urea concentration (r=0.73; P < 0.001). We also observed a moderate but significant negative correlation between the serum HCit and the albumin level (r=−0.05; P = 0.01). The HCit and hs-CRP concentrations were not correlated.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study population

Characteristic Total (N=2195) Baseline Serum HCit (µmol/mol Lys) Imputed Data (N=2195)
T1 <292 (n=730) T2 (292–430) (n=732) T3 ≥430 (n=733)
Serum HCit (µmol/mol Lys) 352 (266–481) 237 (201–266) 352 (323–385) 547 (480–684)
Serum urea (mmol/L) 13.4 (10.3–18.2) 9.90 (8.10–11.8) 13.6 (11.1–16.4) 19.3 (15.3–24.2)
Age (yr) 68 (60–76) 67 (59–73) 68 (60–77) 71 (61–78)
Men 66% 71% 66% 62%
Educational level, yr 1%
 <9 15% 12% 16% 17%
 9–11 49% 48% 48% 51%
 ≥12 36% 40% 36% 32%
Smoking status 1%
 Current smoker 40% 40% 38% 43%
 Never smoker 13% 13% 12% 13%
 Former smoker 47% 47% 50% 44%
BMI (kg/m2) 28.9 (5.8) 29.6 (5.7) 28.7 (6.0) 28.4 (5.8) 2%
Alcohol abuse 6% 7% 6% 6% 1%
Diabetes 42% 44% 43% 40% 0.2%
Dyslipidemia 74% 75% 75% 73% 0.1%
Hypertension 97% 95% 97% 98% 0.1%
Systolic BP (mm Hg) 142 (20) 142 (19) 142 (20) 141 (20) 0.4%
Diastolic BP (mm Hg) 78 (12) 79 (12) 78 (12) 77 (12) 0.5%
History of CVD 53% 48% 54% 57% 0.5%
History of nonatheromatous CVD 14% 12% 15% 16% 0.5%
History of atheromatous CVD 36% 32% 37% 39% 0.7%
Coronary disease 24% 22% 24% 27% 1%
Heart failure 13% 8% 13% 18% 0.1%
Peripheral artery disease 17% 15% 17% 17% 0.7%
Stroke and/or transient ischemic attack 10% 9% 10% 11% 0.7%
History of cerebrovascular disease 12% 10% 12% 13% 0.7%
History of gastrointestinal bleeding 4% 3% 4% 4%
eGFR at baseline (ml/min per 1.73 m2) 34.6 (13.3) 43.8 (12.2) 34.0 (11.5) 26.0 (9.6)
Albumin-to-creatinine ratio (mg/g) 126 (24.5–667) 75.3 (15.6–492) 110 (21.3–677) 206 (43.8–793) 9.4%
 A1 (normal to mildly elevated) 28% 36% 29% 19%
 A2 (moderately elevated) 34% 34% 33% 36%
 A3 (greatly elevated) 38% 31% 38% 44%
Anemia 39% 20% 39% 57% 1.6%
hs-CRP (mg/L) 2.5 (1.1–5.7) 2.5 (1.1–5.5) 2.4 (1.0–4.9) 2.6 (1.2–7.0) 1.2%
Serum albumin (g/L) 40.7 (3.9) 40.8 (4.0) 40.8 (3.7) 40.3 (4.0) 0.2%
Sodium (mmol/L) 140 (2.7) 140 (2.6) 141 (2.7) 140 (2.9) 1.2%
Potassium (mmol/L) 4.54 (0.5) 4.44 (0.5) 4.58 (0.5) 4.59 (0.6) 0.8%
Calcium (mmol/L) 2.35 (0.1) 2.37 (0.1) 2.35 (0.1) 2.34 (0.1) 3.8%
Phosphate (mmol/L) 1.15 (0.2) 1.08 (0.2) 1.14 (0.2) 1.25 (0.2) 5.9%
Uric acid (mmol/L) 427 (118) 413 (107) 431 (116) 437 (128) 9.7%
No. of prescription drugs taken daily 8 (5–10) 7 (4–10) 8 (5–10) 8 (6–11)
Diuretics 55% 45% 53% 67%
β-blockers 43% 41% 42% 47%
Calcium channel blockers 48% 47% 51% 48%
RASi 77% 78% 79% 75%
Statins 59% 59% 59% 59%
Antithrombotic agents 53% 50% 53% 55%
Immunosuppressants 3% 3% 3% 3%
Antigout medications 36% 30% 31% 46%
Proton pump inhibitors 31% 29% 31% 31%

Data are presented as the mean (SD), or the median (first–third quartiles), or percentages. BMI, body mass index; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HCit, homocitrulline; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; Lys, lysine; RASi, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors; T1, tertile 1; T2, tertile 2; T3, tertile 3.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Serum HCit concentrations, by CKD stage. HCit, homocitrulline; Lys, lysine.

Factors Associated with the HCit Concentration

In an adjusted linear regression model, the serum HCit concentration was independently and positively associated with age, the eGFR decrease, urea, anemia, and baseline prescription of diuretics. By contrast, the HCit concentration was negatively associated with male sex and a greatly elevated uACR (Table 2). Notably, after adjustment for multiple variables, the HCit concentration was not significantly associated with the hs-CRP level or a history of CVD. Finally, smoking status, diabetes, and the serum albumin level were not associated with the HCit concentration in univariate models.

Table 2.

Factors associated with the baseline serum homocitrulline concentration (natural log-transformed)

Variable Crude Analysis Adjusted Analysis
ß (95% CI) P Value ß (95% CI) P Value
Age (per 5 yr) 0.02 (0.01 to 0.03) <0.001 0.02 (0.01 to 0.02) <0.001
Men (versus women) −0.08 (−0.12 to −0.04) <0.001 −0.08 (−0.11 to −0.06) <0.001
Smoking status
 Current smoker versus never smoker −0.04 (−0.10 to 0.02) 0.23
 Former smoker versus never smoker −0.02 (−0.06 to 0.02) 0.23
eGFR (per 5 ml/min per 1.73 m2 decrement) 0.10 (0.09 to 0.10) <0.001 0.023 (0.017 to 0.029) <0.001
Log (ACR [mg/g]) 0.003 (−0.0002 to 0.007) 0.06 −0.003 (−0.006 to −0.001) 0.02
BMI (per kg/m2) −0.01 (−0.01 to −0.003) <0.001 −0.02 (−0.02 to −0.01) <0.001
Diabetes −0.02 (−0.06 to 0.02) 0.31
History of CVD 0.07 (0.04 to 0.11) <0.001 0.01 (−0.02 to 0.05) 0.36
Anemia 0.30 (0.26 to 0.33) <0.001 0.07 (0.05 to 0.10) <0.001
Urea (per mmol/L) 0.048 (0.046 to 0.05) <0.001 0.040 (0.038 to 0.043) <0.001
Serum albumin (per g/L decrease) 0.004 (−0.001 to 0.008) 0.13
Log(hs-CRP [mg/L]) 0.02 (0.0004 to 0.03) 0.04 −0.004 (−0.02 to 0.007) 0.49
No. of prescription drugs taken daily 0.02 (0.01 to 0.02) <0.001
Diuretics at baseline 0.19 (0.15 to 0.23) <0.001 0.06 (0.03 to 0.09) <0.001
β blockers at baseline 0.06 (0.02 to 0.10) 0.002 −0.001 (−0.03 to 0.02) 0.92
RASi at baseline −0.03 (−0.08 to 0.01) 0.16
Calcium channel blockers at baseline −0.002 (−0.04 to 0.04) 0.92
Statins at baseline 0.01 (−0.03 to 0.05) 0.59
Antithrombotic agents at baseline 0.05 (0.009 to 0.08) 0.01 −0.02 (−0.05 to 0.01) 0.18
Proton pump inhibitors at baseline 0.03 (−0.01 to 0.07) 0.20

The dependent variable (homocitrulline) was natural log-transformed because of its skewed distribution. Therefore, the interpretation is as follows: for one-unit change in the independent variable, homocitrulline level increases by a factor of exp(β). ACR, albumin-to-creatinine ratio; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; RASi, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors.

MACEs

Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 4.9 (4.8–4.9) years, 324 patients experienced a first MACE. The crude incidence rate (95% CI) was 4.0 (3.5 to 4.4) per 100 person-years. The incidence rate was higher in patients in T3 and in T2 than in patients in T1 (Supplemental Table 3). Relative to patients in T1, the adjusted HR (95% CI) for MACEs associated with the baseline HCit concentration was 1.32 (0.96 to 1.84) for patients in T2 and 1.63 (1.16 to 2.30) for patients in T3 (Figure 2). The results of penalized spline analyses were consistent with the incidence rates and indicated that the risk increased as the HCit concentration rose (Figure 3A).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Numbers of events, incidence rates, and adjusted HRs for MACEs (whether atheromatous or nonatheromatous and fatal or nonfatal) and death before KRT as a function of the baseline serum HCit concentration. *HRs were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, urine albumin- or protein-to-creatinine ratio (natural log-transformed), ACR estimated from proteinuria (binary variable), history of CVD, anemia, serum albumin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (natural log-transformed), and the use of diuretics, statins, and antithrombotic agents at baseline. ACR, albumin-to-creatinine ratio; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Adjusted HR for the occurrence of the first MACE and death before KRT, as a function of the baseline serum HCit concentration, using penalized spline terms. (A) Adjusted HR for first MACE, as a function of the baseline serum HCit concentration. (B) Adjusted HR for death before KRT, as a function of the baseline serum HCit concentration. CI, confidence interval.

Fatal and Nonfatal Atheromatous or Nonatheromatous Cardiovascular Events

Of the 2195 patients, 554 experienced a first atheromatous or nonatheromatous cardiovascular event (fatal or nonfatal) at some point during the follow-up period; this yielded a crude incidence rate (95% CI) of 7.3 (6.7 to 7.9) per 100 person-years. The incidence rate was the highest in patients in the HCit T3 (Supplemental Table 3). After multiple adjustments, the risk of fatal and nonfatal atheromatous or nonatheromatous cardiovascular events was found to be significantly greater for patients in T3 than in patients in T1 (HR [95% CI], 1.42 [1.10 to 1.83], Figure 2). A nonsignificant trend toward a greater risk was also noted for patients in T2 (HR [95% CI], 1.09 [0.86 to 1.39]). A penalized spline analysis showed the same trends (Supplemental Figure 2).

A sensitivity analysis failed to show an association between the baseline HCit concentration and atheromatous cardiovascular events (fatal or nonfatal; Supplemental Figure 3). By contrast, a significantly greater risk of a nonatheromatous cardiovascular event (fatal or nonfatal) was observed in patients in T3 (HR [95% CI], 1.57 [1.15 to 2.14]), and a nonsignificantly greater risk was observed in patients in T2 (HR [95% CI], 1.13 [0.84 to 1.53]; Supplemental Figure 3). The results of penalized spline analyses were consistent with these findings (Supplemental Figure 4).

Death before KRT

Over a median follow-up period of almost 5 years in the CKD-REIN cohort, 284 patients died before KRT; this gave an incidence rate of 3.3 (2.9 to 3.7) per 100 person-years. The incidence rate was higher in patients in HCit T3 and T2 than in patients in T1 (Supplemental Table 3). After multiple adjustments and relative to patients in T1, the risk of death before KRT was 1.48 (1.04 to 2.11) for patients in T2 and 2.09 (1.45 to 3.03) for patients in T3 (Figure 2). Again, the results of penalized spline analysis confirmed these trends (Figure 3B).

Discussion

In a study of 2195 nondialysis patients with CKD selected from a large, prospectively monitored cohort, we found that age, a low eGFR, urea, anemia, and the baseline prescription of diuretics were independently and positively associated with the serum HCit concentration. Male sex and a greatly elevated albumin-to-creatinine ratio were negatively associated with the serum HCit concentration. Furthermore, a high serum HCit concentration was associated with an elevated risk of MACEs and all-cause mortality.

Protein carbamylation has a variety of detrimental effects; it affects renal function, cardiovascular health, and immune responses. We sought to better characterize the factors associated with this process. Consistently with the accumulation of urea, the serum HCit concentration was independently associated with the eGFR and with anemia (a known marker of declining renal function). Interestingly, we found that the median serum HCit concentration was higher in women than in men. However, the urea level did not depend significantly on the sex (P = 0.99). This link between sex and HCit persisted after multivariate adjustment. This finding might be relevant, and we are not aware of published data indicating that carbamylation is more intense in women than in men. This phenomenon and its potential impact warrant further research. The positive association between diuretic prescriptions and the HCit concentration might be due to the lower eGFR and higher serum urea concentration observed in patients on diuretics. However, we cannot rule out a potential, direct influence of diuretics on the HCit concentration. Furthermore, we were unable to demonstrate an association with systemic markers of inflammation because myeloperoxidase-driven carbamylation is a localized process that occurs within atherosclerotic plaques. Our data highlight the prominent role of urea in the carbamylation process in patients with CKD. Furthermore, our findings are in line with literature data from studies of patients with CKD, in which an association between hs-CRP (or myeloperoxidase) and carbamylated-derived products was lacking.7,9,26,27 Although our results do not rule out an influence of inflammation on the development of cardiovascular complications (as reported previously), the data on nonuremic patients28 suggest that CVD can be driven by mechanisms other than carbamylation.

In our cohort of nondialysis patients, we found that a high serum HCit concentration is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We have previously reported on the relationship between an elevated urea concentration and cardiovascular events.5 In this study, we shifted our focus to carbamylation—a process known to result from urea accumulation. An investigation of carbamylation might provide a more integrated understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanism of uremic toxin accumulation and offers a broader perspective on the effects of uremia.29 Significantly elevated levels of carbamylated hemoglobin and other circulating proteins (such as albumin, low-density lipoproteins, and high-density lipoproteins) have been observed in patients with CKD,4 along with evidence of tissue carbamylation—notably in kidney, heart, and aorta.30 This study focused on HCit as a key marker of overall protein carbamylation. In a previous study of a population of patients on hemodialysis, we found that albumin carbamylation was associated with plasma levels of both total HCit and protein-bound HCit.31 Various preclinical studies have corroborated the association between HCit and cardiovascular outcomes in general and nonatherosclerotic events in particular. Indeed, protein carbamylation exacerbated the calcification of human vascular smooth muscle cells by suppressing the expression of ectonucleotide pyrophosphate/phosphodiesterase 1.13 The calcification process (especially medial calcification) is an important factor in the induction of vascular stiffness, which is associated with heart failure. Furthermore, our study of cyanate supplementation in the mouse evidenced greater protein carbamylation in the aortic wall and stiffer elastic fibers.14 This involvement in medial calcification and aortic stiffness might account for the association between HCit and a nonatheromatous CVD event such as heart failure. Furthermore, it has recently been shown that carbamylation of αIIbβ3 (a receptor required for platelet aggregation) is associated with low integrin activation, low fibrinogen binding capacity, impaired platelet adhesion to fibrinogen, and impaired platelet aggregation. The level of protein carbamylation was significantly higher in platelets from patients on hemodialysis than in platelets from controls, confirming the presence of platelet carbamylation in vivo.32 The consequences of platelet carbamylation remains to be characterized. Protein carbamylation affects various proteins involved in complications of CVD. Indeed, low-density lipoproteins are particularly susceptible to carbamylation, which can lead to endothelial cell apoptosis and smooth muscle cell proliferation in vitro33 and other molecular changes that contribute to vascular damage in vivo.34 Most epidemiologic studies showing a link between protein carbamylation, the cardiovascular risk, and the mortality rate were performed in hemodialysis patients79; this study extends this finding to a nondialysis population. A post hoc analysis of the 4D trial in diabetic hemodialysis patients found an association between protein carbamylation, heart failure, and the mortality rate.7 Our present results therefore suggest that nonatherosclerotic events are also associated with protein carbamylation.

Focusing on protein carbamylation (and not just urea accumulation) is important because it might constitute a valuable therapeutic target. Indeed, amino acid concentrations can influence protein carbamylation rates in uremic models in vitro and in vivo.8 Moreover, nutritional therapy with a Mediterranean diet and a very-low-protein diet can reduce protein carbamylation and cyanate production.35 Furthermore, a pilot study in patients on dialysis reported that intravenous amino acid supplementation effectively reduced the carbamylation level of plasma proteins, as evaluated by the percentage of carbamylated albumin.6

This study had several strengths. First, our analysis of a large number of patients from a nationally representative, multicenter, prospective cohort enabled comprehensive adjustments for confounding factors. Second, HCit concentrations were measured centrally, using a robust liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.

Our study also had some limitations. First, the HCit concentrations were measured once (at baseline), and so we were not able to explore putative associations between time-varying concentrations and outcomes. Moreover, we did not assess the dietary protein intake at the time of the blood test; this variable might have affected the HCit level. However, our work could be considered to be a hypothesis-generating study. Second, the study's observational design precluded any causal interpretations.

In conclusion, our analysis of a large cohort of patients with moderate-to-advanced CKD demonstrated that an elevated serum HCit concentration was associated with a greater likelihood of MACE and a higher mortality rate. Targeting elevated levels of protein carbamylation might be a promising way of modifying the cardiovascular risk in patients with CKD.

Supplementary Material

kidney360-6-1328-s002.pdf (629.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the CKD-renal epidemiology and information network study coordination staff for their efforts in setting up the cohort: Marie Metzger, Céline Lange, Oriane Lambert, Heliz Argan, and all the CRAs. The authors also thank the department of biochemistry at Amiens-Picardie University Medical Center, Professor Galmiche, and the laboratory technicians who conducted the serum albumin and urea assays. The authors thank Dr. Thao Nguyen Khoa from the department of biochemistry at Paris Necker-Enfants Malades university medical hospital for dosing hs-CRP. The authors also thank the staff at the biologic resource centers that participated in the project (Supplemental Appendix 1): the Biobanque de Picardie (BB-0033-00017), NeuroBioTec (BB-0033-00046), Center de ressources biologiques (CRB)-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes Hôtel Dieu (BB-0033-00040), CRB-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes (BB-0033-00069), CRB-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (BB-0033-00035), Service de Néphrologie, Center Hospitalier de Perpignan, the Plateforme de Ressources Biologiques-Hôpital Henri Mondor (BB-0033-00021), the Center d'Investigation Clinique Plurithématique CIC-1435, Plateforme de Ressources Biologiques-Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou (BB0033-00063), L'Etablissement Français du sang (EFS) Hauts de France – Normandie (Site de Bois-Guillaume, Site de Loos-Eurasanté), EFS Nouvelle Aquitaine (site Pellegrin), EFS Ile de France (Site Avicenne), EFS Occitanie (Site de Toulouse), EFS Grand-Est (Site de Colmar, Site de Metz), EFS PACA-Corse (Site de Marseille).

The cohort was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (FR) (ANR-IA-COH-2012/3731), Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (FR), GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim France, Fresenius Medical Care, Vifor France, Sanofi-Genzyme, Baxter, Merck Sharp and Dohme France, Amgen, Lilly France, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, and AstraZeneca.

Footnotes

Z.A.M. and S.L. contributed equally to this work.

*

The CKD-REIN Study Group steering committee and coordinators include: Natalia Alencar de Pinho, Dorothée Cannet, Christian Combe, Denis Fouque, Luc Frimat, Aghilès Hamroun, Yves-Edouard Herpe, Christian Jacquelinet, Oriane Lambert, Céline Lange, Maurice Laville, Sophie Liabeuf, Ziad A. Massy, Marie Metzger, Pascal Morel, Christophe Pascal, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Joost Schantsra, and Bénédicte Stengel. Investigators: Alsace: Prs T. Hannedouche et B. Moulin (CHU, Strasbourg), Dr. A. Klein (CH Colmar) Aquitaine: Pr C. Combe (CHU, Bordeaux), Dr. J.P. Bourdenx (Clinique St Augustin, Bordeaux), Dr. A. Keller, Dr. C. Delclaux (CH, Libourne), Dr. B. Vendrely (Clinique St Martin, Pessac), Dr. B. Deroure (Clinique Delay, Bayonne), Dr. A. Lacraz (CH, Bayonne) Basse Normandie: Dr. T. Lobbedez (CHU, Caen), Dr. I. Landru (CH, Lisieux) Ile de France: Pr Z. Massy (CHU, Boulogne – Billancourt), Pr P. Lang (CHU, Créteil), Dr. X. Belenfant (CH, Montreuil), Pr E. Thervet (CHU, Paris), Dr. P. Urena (Clinique du Landy, St Ouen), Dr. M. Delahousse (Hôpital Foch, Suresnes) Languedoc – Roussillon: Dr. C. Vela (CH, Perpignan) Limousin: Pr M. Essig, Dr. D. Clément (CHU, Limoges) Lorraine: Dr. H. Sekhri, Dr. M. Smati (CH, Epinal) Dr. M. Jamali, Dr. B. Hacq (Clinique Louis Pasteur, Essey-les-Nancy), Dr. V. Panescu, Dr. M. Bellou (Polyclinique de Gentilly, Nancy), Pr Luc Frimat (CHU, Vandœuvre-les-Nancy) Midi-Pyrénées: Pr N. Kamar (CHU, Toulouse) Nord-Pas-de-Calais: Prs C. Noël et F. Glowacki (CHU, Lille), Dr. N. Maisonneuve (CH, Valenciennes), Dr. R. Azar (CH, Dunkerque), Dr. M. Hoffmann (Hôpital privé La Louvière, Lille) Pays-de-la Loire: Pr M. Hourmant (CHU, Nantes), Dr. A. Testa (Center de dialyze, Rezé), Dr. D. Besnier (CH, St Nazaire) Picardie: Pr G. Choukroun (CHU, Amiens), Dr. G. Lambrey (CH, Beauvais) Provence-Alpes - Côte d’Azur: Pr S. Burtey (CHU, Marseille), Dr. G. Lebrun (CH, Aix-en-Provence), Dr. E. Magnant (Polyclinique du Parc Rambot, Aix-en-Provence) Rhône-Alpes: Pr M. Laville, Pr D. Fouque (CHU, Lyon-Sud) et L. Juillard (CHU Edouard Herriot, Lyon), Dr. C. Chazot (Center de rein artificiel Tassin Charcot, Ste Foy-les-Lyon), Pr P. Zaoui (CHU, Grenoble), Dr. F. Kuentz (Center de santé rénale, Grenoble).

Contributor Information

Collaborators: Natalia Alencar de Pinho, Dorothée Cannet, Christian Combe, Denis Fouque, Luc Frimat, Aghilès Hamroun, Yves-Edouard Herpe, Christian Jacquelinet, Oriane Lambert, Céline Lange, Maurice Laville, Sophie Liabeuf, Ziad A. Massy, Marie Metzger, Pascal Morel, Christophe Pascal, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Joost Schantsra, Bénédicte Stengel, T. Hannedouche, B. Moulin, A. Klein, C. Combe, J.P. Bourdenx, A. Keller, C. Delclaux, B. Vendrely, B. Deroure, A. Lacraz, T. Lobbedez, I. Landru, Z. Massy, P. Lang, X. Belenfant, E. Thervet, P. Urena, M. Delahousse, C. Vela, M. Essig, D. Clément, H. Sekhri, M. Smati, M. Jamali, B. Hacq, V. Panescu, M. Bellou, Luc Frimat, N. Kamar, C. Noël, F. Glowacki, N. Maisonneuve, R. Azar, M. Hoffmann, M. Hourmant, A. Testa, D. Besnier, G. Choukroun, G. Lambrey, S. Burtey, G. Lebrun, E. Magnant, M. Laville, D. Fouque, L. Juillard, C. Chazot, P. Zaoui, and F. Kuentz

Disclosures

Disclosure forms, as provided by each author, are available with the online version of the article at http://links.lww.com/KN9/B9.

Funding

None.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Solène M. Laville, Sophie Liabeuf, Ziad A. Massy.

Data curation: Philippe Gillery, Stéphane Jaisson, Solène M. Laville, Nicolas Mansencal, Anaïs Okwieka.

Formal analysis: Solène M. Laville.

Investigation: Ziad A. Massy.

Methodology: Solène M. Laville, Sophie Liabeuf.

Project administration: Natalia Alencar de Pinho, Sophie Liabeuf.

Supervision: Sophie Liabeuf, Ziad A. Massy.

Validation: Solène M. Laville, Sophie Liabeuf, Ziad A. Massy.

Visualization: Solène M. Laville, Sophie Liabeuf.

Writing – original draft: Philippe Gillery, Stéphane Jaisson, Solène M. Laville, Sophie Liabeuf, Ziad A. Massy.

Writing – review & editing: Natalia Alencar de Pinho, Christian Combe, Philippe Gillery, Stéphane Jaisson, Solène M. Laville, Sophie Liabeuf, Nicolas Mansencal, Ziad A. Massy, Anaïs Okwieka.

Data Sharing Statement

Partial restrictions to the data and/or materials apply. The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request by contacting the CKD-REIN study coordination staff at ckdrein@inserm.fr. The funding sources had no roles in study design, conduct, reporting or the decision to submit for publication.

Supplemental Material

This article contains the following supplemental material online at http://links.lww.com/KN9/B10.

Supplemental Table 1. Definitions of variables.

Supplemental Table 2. Definitions of cardiovascular outcomes.

Supplemental Table 3. Incidence rates of outcomes, as a function of the baseline serum HCit concentration.

Supplemental Figure 1. Study flow chart.

Supplemental Figure 2. Adjusted HR for the occurrence of the first atheromatous or nonatheromatous event as a function of the baseline serum HCit concentration, using penalized spline terms.

Supplemental Figure 3. Numbers of events, incidence rates, and adjusted HRs for the first atheromatous and nonatheromatous events as a function of the baseline serum HCit concentration.

Supplemental Figure 4. Adjusted HR for the occurrence of the first atheromatous cardiovascular event and the first nonatheromatous cardiovascular event, as a function of the baseline serum HCit concentration, using penalized spline terms. (A) Adjusted HR for the first atheromatous CVD event, as a function of the baseline serum HCit concentration. (B) Adjusted HR for the first nonatheromatous CVD event, as a function of the baseline serum HCit concentration.

Supplemental Appendix 1. List of biologic resources centers.

References

  • 1.Jaisson S, Gillery P. Evaluation of nonenzymatic posttranslational modification-derived products as biomarkers of molecular aging of proteins. Clin Chem. 2010;56(9):1401–1412. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.145201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jaisson S, Pietrement C, Gillery P. Protein Carbamylation: Chemistry, Pathophysiological Involvement, and Biomarkers, Advances in Clinical Chemistry Vol 84, edited by Makowski GS, Advances in Clinical Chemistry, Elsevier, 2018, pp 1–38. 10.1016/bs.acc.2017.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jaisson S Kazes I Desmons A, et al. Homocitrulline as marker of protein carbamylation in hemodialyzed patients. Clinica Chim Acta. 2016;460:5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gorisse L, Jaisson S, Piétrement C, Gillery P. Carbamylated proteins in renal disease: aggravating factors or just biomarkers?. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(1):574. doi: 10.3390/ijms23010574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Laville SM Couturier A Lambert O, et al.; CKD-REIN study collaborators. CKD-REIN study collaborators: urea levels and cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022;38(1):184–192. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kalim S Ortiz G Trottier CA, et al. The effects of parenteral amino acid therapy on protein carbamylation in maintenance hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr. 2015;25(4):388–392. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2015.01.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Drechsler C Kalim S Wenger JB, et al. Protein carbamylation is associated with heart failure and mortality in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 2015;87(6):1201–1208. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berg AH Drechsler C Wenger J, et al. Carbamylation of serum albumin as a risk factor for mortality in patients with kidney failure. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(175):175ra29. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Koeth RA, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Wang Z, Fu X, Tang WHW, Hazen SL. Protein carbamylation predicts mortality in ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(5):853–861. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012030254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kalim S Berg AH Karumanchi SA, et al.; CRIC Study Investigators. Protein carbamylation and chronic kidney disease progression in the chronic renal insufficiency cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;37(1):139–147. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Awwad A Rhee EP Grams M, et al.; CRIC Study Investigators. Comparative CKD risk prediction using homocitrulline and carbamylated albumin: two circulating markers of protein carbamylation. BMC Nephrol. 2024;25(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03619-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Delanghe S, Delanghe JR, Speeckaert R, Van Biesen W, Speeckaert MM. Mechanisms and consequences of carbamoylation. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(9):580–593. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mori D Matsui I Shimomura A, et al. Protein carbamylation exacerbates vascular calcification. Kidney Int. 2018;94(1):72–90. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.01.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Doué M Okwieka A Berquand A, et al. Carbamylation of elastic fibers is a molecular substratum of aortic stiffness. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):17827. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97293-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP.; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–1457. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stengel B Metzger M Combe C, et al. Risk profile, quality of life and care of patients with moderate and advanced CKD: the French CKD-REIN Cohort Study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34(2):277–286. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Levey AS Stevens LA Schmid CH, et al.; CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–612. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sumida K Nadkarni GN Grams ME, et al.; Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium. Conversion of urine protein-creatinine ratio or urine dipstick protein to urine albumin-creatinine ratio for use in chronic kidney disease screening and prognosis: an individual participant-based meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(6):426–435. doi: 10.7326/M20-0529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jaisson S, Desmons A, Doué M, Gorisse L, Pietrement C, Gillery P. Measurement of homocitrulline, A carbamylation-derived product, in serum and tissues by LC-MS/MS. Curr Protoc. 2023;3(4):e762. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jaisson S, Kerkeni M, Santos-Weiss ICR, Addad F, Hammami M, Gillery P. Increased serum homocitrulline concentrations are associated with the severity of coronary artery disease. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(1):103–110. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hicks KA Mahaffey KW Mehran R, et al.; Standardized Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (SCTI). 2017 cardiovascular and stroke endpoint definitions for clinical trials. Circulation. 2018;137(9):961–972. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Couchoud C, Lassalle M. Rapport Annuel 2017 - Réseau Epidémiologie, Information, Néphrologie; 2020. Accessed March 20, 2025. Available from: https://www.agence-biomedecine.fr/IMG/pdf/rapportrein2017.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Faucon A-L Lambert O Massy Z, et al.; CKD-REIN Study collaborators. Sex and the risk of atheromatous and nonatheromatous cardiovascular disease in CKD: findings from the CKD-REIN cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2024;84(5):546–556.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.04.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2011;45(3):1–67. doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i03 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; 2022. Accessed March 20, 2025. https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kalim S, Karumanchi SA, Thadhani RI, Berg AH. Protein carbamylation in kidney disease: pathogenesis and clinical implications. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64(5):793–803. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tang M, Kalim S. Avenues for post-translational protein modification prevention and therapy. Mol Aspects Med. 2022;86:101083. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2022.101083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang Z Nicholls SJ Rodriguez ER, et al. Protein carbamylation links inflammation, smoking, uremia and atherogenesis. Nat Med. 2007;13(10):1176–1184. doi: 10.1038/nm1637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Desmons A, Jaisson S, Pietrement C, Rieu P, Wynckel A, Gillery P. Homocitrulline: a new marker for differentiating acute from chronic renal failure. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54(1):73–79. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pietrement C, Gorisse L, Jaisson S, Gillery P. Chronic increase of urea leads to carbamylated proteins accumulation in tissues in a mouse model of CKD. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lenglet A, Jaisson S, Gillery P, El Balkhi S, Liabeuf S, Massy ZA. Comparison of homocitrulline and carbamylated albumin as biomarkers of carbamylation reactions in hemodialyzed patients. Amino Acids. 2023;55(10):1455–1460. doi: 10.1007/s00726-023-03306-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Binder V Chruścicka-Smaga B Bergum B, et al. Carbamylation of integrin α IIb β 3: the mechanistic link to platelet dysfunction in ESKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33(10):1841–1856. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2022010013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ok E, Basnakian AG, Apostolov EO, Barri YM, Shah SV. Carbamylated low-density lipoprotein induces death of endothelial cells: a link to atherosclerosis in patients with kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2005;68(1):173–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00391.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Massy ZA, Pietrement C, Touré F. Reconsidering the lack of urea toxicity in dialysis patients. Semin Dial. 2016;29(5):333–337. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Di Iorio BR Marzocco S Bellasi A, et al. Nutritional therapy reduces protein carbamylation through urea lowering in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018;33(5):804–813. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Partial restrictions to the data and/or materials apply. The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request by contacting the CKD-REIN study coordination staff at ckdrein@inserm.fr. The funding sources had no roles in study design, conduct, reporting or the decision to submit for publication.


Articles from Kidney360 are provided here courtesy of American Society of Nephrology

RESOURCES