Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2002 Apr;110(4):433–436. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110433

The pitfalls of hair analysis for toxicants in clinical practice: three case reports.

Melissa Frisch 1, Brian S Schwartz 1
PMCID: PMC1240808  PMID: 11940463

Abstract

Hair analysis is used to assess exposure to heavy metals in patients presenting with nonspecific symptoms and is a commonly used procedure in patients referred to our clinic. We are frequently called on to evaluate patients who have health-related concerns as a result of hair analysis. Three patients first presented to outside physicians with nonspecific, multisystemic symptoms. A panel of analytes was measured in hair, and one or more values were interpreted as elevated. As a result of the hair analysis and other unconventional diagnostic tests, the patients presented to us believing they suffered from metal toxicity. In this paper we review the clinical efficacy of this procedure within the context of a patient population with somatic disorders and no clear risk factors for metal intoxication. We also review limitations of hair analysis in this setting; these limitations include patient factors such as low pretest probability of disease and test factors such as the lack of validation of analytic techniques, the inability to discern between exogenous contaminants and endogenous toxicants in hair, the variability of analytic procedures, low interlaboratory reliability, and the increased likelihood of false positive test results in the measurement of panels of analytes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (552.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrett S. Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam? JAMA. 1985 Aug 23;254(8):1041–1045. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davidson P. W., Myers G. J., Cox C., Axtell C., Shamlaye C., Sloane-Reeves J., Cernichiari E., Needham L., Choi A., Wang Y. Effects of prenatal and postnatal methylmercury exposure from fish consumption on neurodevelopment: outcomes at 66 months of age in the Seychelles Child Development Study. JAMA. 1998 Aug 26;280(8):701–707. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.8.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fletcher D. J. Hair analysis. Proven and problematic applications. Postgrad Med. 1982 Nov;72(5):79-81, 84, 87-8. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1982.11716248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Forman J., Moline J., Cernichiari E., Sayegh S., Torres J. C., Landrigan M. M., Hudson J., Adel H. N., Landrigan P. J. A cluster of pediatric metallic mercury exposure cases treated with meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Jun;108(6):575–577. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Frumkin H., Manning C. C., Williams P. L., Sanders A., Taylor B. B., Pierce M., Elon L., Hertzberg V. S. Diagnostic chelation challenge with DMSA: a biomarker of long-term mercury exposure? Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Feb;109(2):167–171. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guidotti T. L. Unjustified employee concern aroused by a direct-service toxicologic testing laboratory. J Occup Med. 1983 Sep;25(9):693–693. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198309000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hambidge K. M. Hair analyses: worthless for vitamins, limited for minerals. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982 Nov;36(5):943–949. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/36.5.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Klevay L. M., Bistrian B. R., Fleming C. R., Neumann C. G. Hair analysis in clinical and experimental medicine. Am J Clin Nutr. 1987 Aug;46(2):233–236. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/46.2.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koons R. D., Peters C. A. Axial distribution of arsenic in individual human hairs by solid sampling graphite furnace AAS. J Anal Toxicol. 1994 Jan-Feb;18(1):36–40. doi: 10.1093/jat/18.1.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin J. L., Tan D. T., Hsu K. H., Yu C. C. Environmental lead exposure and progressive renal insufficiency. Arch Intern Med. 2001 Jan 22;161(2):264–271. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.2.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Manson P., Zlotkin S. Hair analysis--a critical review. Can Med Assoc J. 1985 Aug 1;133(3):186–188. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miekeley N., Dias Carneiro M. T., da Silveira C. L. How reliable are human hair reference intervals for trace elements? Sci Total Environ. 1998 Jul 11;218(1):9–17. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00185-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rivlin R. S. Misuse of hair analysis for nutritional assessment. Am J Med. 1983 Sep;75(3):489–493. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)90355-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Seidel S., Kreutzer R., Smith D., McNeel S., Gilliss D. Assessment of commercial laboratories performing hair mineral analysis. JAMA. 2001 Jan 3;285(1):67–72. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.1.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sky-Peck H. H. Distribution of trace elements in human hair. Clin Physiol Biochem. 1990;8(2):70–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Taylor A. Usefulness of measurements of trace elements in hair. Ann Clin Biochem. 1986 Jul;23(Pt 4):364–378. doi: 10.1177/000456328602300402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES