Skip to main content
Science Advances logoLink to Science Advances
. 2025 Sep 5;11(36):eadv5906. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adv5906

Repurposing polyethylene terephthalate plastic waste to capture carbon dioxide

Margarita Poderyte 1,2, Rodrigo Lima 1,3, Peter Illum Golbækdal 1, Dennis Wilkens Juhl 4,5, Kathrine L Olesen 4, Niels Chr Nielsen 4,5, Arianna Lanza 1, Ji-Woong Lee 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC12412650  PMID: 40911693

Abstract

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is a ubiquitous polymer with a lack of viable waste management solutions besides mechanical recycling, incineration, and landfilling. Herein, we demonstrate a chemical upcycling of PET waste into materials for CO2 capture via aminolysis. The aminolysis reaction products—a bis-aminoamide (BAETA) and oligomers—exhibit high CO2 capture capacity up to 3.4 moles per kilogram as a stand-alone organic solid material. BAETA shows strong chemisorption featuring high selectivity for CO2 capture from flue gas (5 to 20% CO2) and ambient air (~400 parts per million CO2) under humid conditions. Our thermally stable material (>250°C) enables CO2 capture at high temperatures (up to 170°C) for multiple cycles. Scalability of the material production was demonstrated by performing aminolysis of untreated consumer waste PET of 1 kilogram. Our approach introduces a simple and straightforward solution that can address both plastic waste and carbon dioxide, offering a potential pathway toward net negative emissions.


A scalable chemical upcycling of PET waste into an efficient, durable, and selective CO2 sorbent has been achieved.

INTRODUCTION

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is among the most widely produced plastics, with annual production reaching 70 million metric tons (Mt), accounting for 18% of global plastic output (1, 2). However, PET waste recycling is limited due to inadequate collection infrastructure, the complexity of sorting, and the lower market demand and economic viability of recycled PET compared to using virgin PET resin (1, 3). It is estimated that ~85 to 90% of produced PET is either incinerated to supply energy or landfilled, both of which pose environmental challenges and contribute to additional CO2 emissions (47). Only a fraction—10 to 15%—of PET (8) is recycled, predominantly through mechanical (9, 10) and chemical methods (2, 1113), yet the efficacy of these methods needs substantial improvement (14). Given the anticipated increase in PET and general plastic production and waste generation due to population growth (15), it is critical to explore alternative solutions beyond mechanical recycling, landfilling, and energy recovery (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1. Repurposing PET plastic waste to capture carbon dioxide.

Fig. 1.

(A) PET life cycle and project motivation. (B) Alternative waste mitigation offering PET upcycling into scalable carbon capture materials [X = N(H) or O].

Upcycling of plastic waste is an emerging approach that can repurpose waste into functional applications (16). Therefore, chemical upcycling of PET waste into CO2 capture materials can potentially address two urgent societal problems: accumulation of plastic waste and atmospheric CO2 (17, 18). It has been estimated that carbon dioxide removal (CDR) should reach the capacity of 1.5 to 2.6 billion metric tons (Gt) annually to meet carbon neutrality by 2050 (19, 20). In this scenario, any useful CO2-sorbent material must be produced, at least, in the order of million metric tons per year from cheap and abundant sources (21). Notably, the upcycling of PET waste for CO2 capture has been explored by producing activated carbons via energy intensive pyrolysis (2224) or by generating organic ligands for synthesizing metal-organic frameworks (25, 26).

By contrast, selective depolymerization reactions can offer the advantage of breaking down polymers into their corresponding monomers or modifying them into other valuable materials, allowing the creation of desired specific properties (3). Recently, we demonstrated catalytic depolymerization of polyesters under metal-free conditions using glycolysis (11). We envision that the utilization of aminolysis of PET (2735) can provide a scalable, robust, cost-effective, and operationally simple process to access sorbents for capturing CO2. Herein, we demonstrate the upcycling of postconsumer PET waste using low-cost 1,2-ethylenediamine (EN) into an organic molecular solid-state CO2 sorbent, N1,N4-bis(2-aminoethyl)terephthalamide (BAETA), and oligomers (OLs) via atom-economic aminolysis (Fig. 1B).

RESULTS

CO2 sorbent synthesis from PET waste via aminolysis optimization

Amine-based sorbents are commonly used as an aqueous solution for carbon capture due to their relatively low energy requirements for regeneration [172 kJ/mol for 30 wt % monoethanolamine (MEA)] and high CO2 sorption capacities (0.4 to 0.5 mol of CO2 per mole of amine). However, one of the key limitations of MEA is associated with notable solvent loss at the absorber and degradation of the absorbent under thermal regeneration conditions into potentially toxic compounds for the environment (36). This leads to substantial operational costs for carbon capture for regenerating MEA. By incorporating diamine moieties within the terephthalic scaffold, we aimed to address the drawbacks associated with small amine-based aqueous sorbents, including, for example, MEA’s low boiling point (116°C), thermal stability (<120°C) (37), high vapor pressure (2.13 kPa at 25°C), volatility (38), corrosiveness, and environmental toxicity (39).

EN was selected for the purpose of selective depolymerization of PET, owing to its high reactivity toward PET and high CO2 capture capacity (40, 41). As the general source of PET, drinking bottles were used with minimal pretreatment that only included cutting and rinsing with water (see Supplementary Materials, Section 2.1). Building on the known PET aminolysis reactions (2735), we optimized the depolymerization conditions to access the monomer BAETA and related OLs by using minimal amounts of EN relative to PET (Fig. 2, A and B). This provides atom-economical reaction conditions with high yields of the desired products. The reaction was performed either at 60°C under stirring for 24 hours or at room temperature over a period of up to 2 weeks. BAETA was obtained in up to 60% yield, along with OLs (<40%). BAETA can be separated from OLs through hot filtration, as it dissolves in hot methanol or hot water, whereas OLs are insoluble (see Supplementary Materials, Section 2). Notably, the reaction by-product ethylene glycol can be collected via distillation (Supplementary Materials, Section 2.3).

Fig. 2. PET waste upcycling into solid CO2 sorbents via aminolysis.

Fig. 2.

(A) PET aminolysis in the literature. TBD, 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene. (B) Reaction scheme for PET aminolysis using EN under optimized conditions. (C) PET sources used in the aminolysis reaction, including drinking bottles, food packaging, stuffing materials for toys, and textiles, along with the resulting yields of BAETA + OLs. (D) Scale-up of the PET aminolysis reaction to 1 kg of PET substrate using 2 molar equiv of EN at room temperature. r.t., room temperature. (E) Selective PET aminolysis reaction performed by mixing PET with common household waste materials.

Scale-up and PET waste-stream scope

We then tested various sources of postconsumer PET waste such as PET bottles, PET fibers, PET food packaging, and PET textiles, which were smoothly converted into BAETA (Fig. 2C). We also scaled up the depolymerization using 1 kg of untreated end-of-use consumer PET waste affording 800 g of products—BAETA-OL mixture after simple purification (Fig. 2D). Considering the diverse range of PET to be recycled directly from the postconsumer waste stream, we applied our aminolysis procedure to a mixture of waste, including food packaging (100% PET), food waste (chili mayo), disposable cups (100% polystyrene), paper (100% cellulose), aluminum foil, disposable laboratory gloves (100% nitrile butadiene rubber), wrapping film (100% polyethylene), and cotton balls (Fig. 2E). The results showed only a slight decrease in the yield of BAETA (38%) while conserving other unreacted wastes, showcasing the applicability and robustness of our depolymerization process.

BAETA sorbent thermal stability and comparison with other amines

After establishing a procedure for accessing BAETA, the initial analyses were focused on its thermal stability and CO2 capture performance. BAETA demonstrated stability up to 220°C (fig. S2) under air, with decomposition beginning around 250°C. Thermogravimetric analyses (TGAs) of OLs presented a similar profile to BAETA, with a higher temperature (300°C; fig. S3) required for full decomposition. Both BAETA and OLs can withstand temperatures up to 250°C in CO2, N2, and compressed air, as detailed in Supplementary Materials, Section 2.6. Thus, BAETA and OLs could, in principle, be applied in flue gas CO2 capture processes at high temperatures (120° to 150°C). This was further confirmed by testing the stability of BAETA in comparison with common amine sorbents such as MEA, by independently preparing sorbent-CO2 adducts and subjecting them to thermal decomposition conditions (Fig. 3A). The BAETA-CO2 adduct showed exceptionally high thermal stability compared to all tested CO2 adducts. BAETA releases CO2 only after 150°C and remains stable until 250°C, followed by oligomerization (releasing 1 equiv of diamine to form a dimer and OLs; see fig. S58). In contrast, other amine sorbents showed complete evaporation and decomposition at temperatures around 100°C. These results indicate that BAETA offers superior thermal stability as a pure organic compound, making it a suitable and effective solid sorbent for CO2 capture applications without requiring additional support or solvent.

Fig. 3. Stability and CO2 capture performances of BAETA and OLs.

Fig. 3.

(A) Thermal stability of the BAETA-CO2 adduct compared with diamine-CO2 adducts under a 100% N2 flow of 90 ml/min, heating rate: 1°C/min. (B) CO2 uptake profile of BAETA at various temperatures; 90 ml/min, 100% CO2 flow. (C) CO2 uptake at 150°C under simulated flue gas conditions (15% CO2 + compressed air: 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, ~1% argon, and trace gases like CO2). (D) Oxidative stability of BAETA and its CO2 capture performance after repeated exposure to air at 100°C; CO2 capture performed at 150°C, 90 ml/min, 100% CO2 flow for sorption and 100% N2 for desorption. (E) Recyclability profile at 150°C, 90 ml/min, flow of 15% CO2 + 85% N2 for sorption and 100% N2 for desorption. (F) CO2 uptake using pelletized BAETA (at 150°C, 90 ml/min, 15% CO2 + 85% N2 flow for sorption and 100% N2 for desorption). (G) CO2 absorption at r.t. under 1 atm CO2 at different RH levels. (H) DAC performance at 75% RH and r.t. Blue: CO2 concentration in air before the capture column; purple: CO2 concentration of the processed air after the BAETA filter.

CO2 capture at elevated temperature and flue gas application

After confirming the thermal stability of BAETA, we evaluated BAETA in terms of gravimetric CO2 uptake performance at various temperatures. Enhanced performance of CO2 uptake was observed at elevated temperatures, with the highest gravimetric uptake observed at 150°C [15 wt % for BAETA (Fig. 3B) and 3.8 wt % for OLs (fig. S12)]. Kinetic studies showed an activation energy of 150 kJ/mol for BAETA (Supplementary Materials, Section 4.5), consistent with its observed CO2 capture behavior, suggesting chemisorption to form a carbamate. This result shows that BAETA has a higher energy requirement for CO2 capture at equilibrium compared to other amine-based solvents, which typically have a heat of absorption around 80 to 100 kJ/mol (42). The high activation energy of BAETA implies slower CO2 capture at a low temperature. However, more stable adduct formation is plausible, suggesting enhanced selectivity for CO2 capture and reliable performance under elevated temperatures of flue gas. Further investigations into the CO2 capture capabilities of BAETA under flue gas conditions (using 5 to 10% CO2 in N2 flow) revealed that the rate and capacity of CO2 absorption decreased only a small fraction, achieving up to 11 to 13 wt % CO2 uptake (Fig. 3C and fig. S15). BAETA showed comparable CO2 uptake performance with a gas mixture of 15% CO2 and 85% synthetic air at 120° to 150°C (Fig. 3C, blue curve, and fig. S18).

Oxidative stress and durability over multiple thermal treatment cycles

Amine-based sorbents are prone to oxidative degradation due to prolonged exposure to oxygen, heat, and impurities in flue gases. Amine-functionalized resins, such as commercial Lewatit resin, tend to be more stable than MEA-based liquid amines; however, they still suffer from oxidative degradation (4347). To demonstrate the potential applications of BAETA in flue gas treatment and direct air capture (DAC), its oxidative stability was tested by exposing BAETA to air at 100°C for 60 min, followed by a CO2 capture cycle at 150°C (Fig. 3D and fig. S22A). The performance was then compared with commercial Lewatit resin (fig. S22B). As shown in Fig. 3D and fig. S22A, BAETA retains its CO2 capture and release performance after exposure to air at 100°C for 60 min, maintaining a constant CO2 uptake of 14 wt % over five cycles. In contrast, Lewatit (fig. S22B) initially captures only 2.25 wt % CO2, and its performance deteriorates after each exposure to hot air, reaching a CO2 uptake of only 1.7 wt % by the fifth cycle. This demonstrates the remarkable thermal and oxidative stability of BAETA.

Because of its demonstrated efficiency after repeated oxidative stress at high temperatures, we continued investigating the durability of BAETA under flue gas conditions by performing 40 consecutive cycles of CO2 capture and desorption at an elevated temperature (150°C). A gas mixture comprising 15% CO2 and 85% N2 was selected for the absorption phase (30 min), and a 100% N2 flow (20 min) was used for the desorption step. Over this range of 40 cycles at a constant temperature of 150°C, the CO2 capture capacity of BAETA exhibited no detectable decrease, indicating the effectiveness of BAETA as a recyclable and durable CO2 sorbent (Fig. 3E). To further illustrate the processability of BAETA, a pelletization test was performed without any additional binders, providing pellets with comparable CO2 capture capacity to the original powder form (Fig. 3F).

After subjecting BAETA to repeated thermal treatment cycles, a gradual decrease in CO2 capture efficiency was observed due to oligomerization via transamidation occurring under CO2 capture cycling conditions of Fig. 3E (150°C with a N2 flow of 90 ml/min). A by-product of the transamidation is EN, which is released during oligomerization. However, the presence of CO2 stabilizes the material and prevents this oligomerization (fig. S19). To ensure long-term stability of BAETA, optimizing the thermal treatment cycling rate and duration will be necessary to maintain BAETA’s sorption capacity. In this context, the desorption time was adjusted and optimized to ensure that a small amount of CO2 remains on the sorbent, leading to optimized conditions and recycling experiments up to 150 cycles, which balances regeneration while maintaining stability (see Supplementary Materials, Section 3.6 and fig. S16).

Carbon capture at different relative humidity levels and direct air capture application

Because the resulting CO2 adducts of BAETA showed remarkable stability, we presumed that a carbon capture process can be spontaneous even at low CO2 concentrations (47). Although BAETA showed no CO2 uptake at low temperatures under our experimental conditions, the exposure of BAETA at room temperature to ambient laboratory air showed notable CO2 uptake (Supplementary Materials, Sections 3.2 and 3.3). It is believed that water lowers the energy barrier for CO2 capture directly from the air, thereby facilitating the formation of carbamate and/or bicarbonate salts assisted by ambient humidity (48, 49). Therefore, we tested the impact of humidity for BAETA and OLs in carbon capture by modulating the relative humidity (RH), ranging from 0 to 100% RH, at 25°C from 1 atm CO2 for 7 days (Fig. 3G and Supplementary Materials, Section 3.12). BAETA and OLs both showed an increase in CO2 capture capacity as the humidity level increases. Notably, lower capacity (4 to 6 wt %) was observed at lower humidity levels than 50% RH, whereas the highest CO2 capture capacity was observed at a high RH (up to 12 wt %).

The application potential in DAC was evaluated with a continuous CO2 capture experimental setup (figs. S28 and S29) with a filter containing BAETA (1.5 g) at a continuous airflow of 5.4 ml/min at room temperature. The RH was monitored and maintained at 75% to promote DAC. It was observed that BAETA was capable of purifying air to sequestrate CO2 for more than 13 days (Fig. 3H), resulting in 83 liters of air processed and 0.063 g of CO2 captured with a capture efficiency of 88% based on the total CO2 passed through the column that was determined by reference CO2 sensor (no BAETA filtration, blue plot) and compared with CO2 concentration data after BAETA DAC filter (see experimental details in Supplementary Materials, Section 3.11).

Thermodynamic properties of BAETA

The thermal properties of BAETA were determined by conducting calorimetry (25 mM aqueous sorbent solution at 25°C; Supplementary Materials, Section 4.4), providing a heat of absorption of −37.2 kJ/mol (first equivalent of CO2) and −33.6 kJ/mol (second equivalent of CO2). When compared with benchmark systems (e.g., MEA: −37.4 kJ/mol and EN: −39.7 kJ/mol under identical conditions), the heat of absorption of BAETA is close to MEA. For BAETA in solid form, up to 130° to 140°C or heating was required to fully desorb CO2 from BAETA under reduced pressure (~5 mmHg). It is noteworthy here that BAETA showed high thermal stability in boiling water under air, implying the possibility of using steam for the desorption step (Supplementary Materials, Section 3.14). Owing to the exceptional water, heat, and oxidation stability of BAETA, the use of boiling water was sufficient to desorb >99% CO2 within 20 min in a preliminary test (12.5 mM BAETA in 6 ml of D2O).

Structural changes during CO2 sorption determined by solid-state NMR and electron diffraction

Our PET-derived CO2 sorbent, BAETA, is most effective for CO2 capture as a solid, without the need for dissolution or additional solid support. Therefore, we used solid-state analysis techniques: Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, solid-state magic angle spinning (MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and three-dimensional electron diffraction (3D ED) on the BAETA-CO2 adduct to elucidate the high thermal stability of the CO2 adduct and the CO2 uptake mechanism. The BAETA-CO2 adduct was directly obtained from our standard CO2 capture and DAC conditions (Fig. 4A). Infrared spectra indicate additional peaks (1579 and 1444 cm−1 of C═O stretch and 3322 cm−1 N─H stretch from carbamate) after CO2 treatment regardless of CO2 capture conditions using concentrated or diluted CO2 (Fig. 4B). Further structural studies of the BAETA-CO2 by solid-state 13C and 15N cross-polarization/MAS NMR (CP/MAS NMR) spectroscopy verified the nature of the CO2 capture (Fig. 4C, blue and magenta: before and after CO2 exposure, respectively). After CO2 uptake, a new species was obtained, which was assigned to ammonium carbamate (5052) with an unsymmetrical structure. This is confirmed by 13C solid-state NMR (ss-NMR), where a new C═O peak at 164 parts per million (ppm) appears after CO2 sorption, indicating carbamate formation. In addition, the original C═O peak from the BAETA amide bond splits into two distinct signals, suggesting an asymmetrical molecule where one amine group binds CO2 as carbamate whereas the other is protonated. Further evidence from 15N ss-NMR supports this structure, with peaks at 32 ppm (R─NH3+) and 85 ppm (R─NHCO2), as well as a new amide peak at 110 ppm. The complete disappearance of the original amine peak at 22 ppm confirms that all BAETA molecules undergo quantitative conversion to BAETA-CO2. The use of 13C-labeled CO2 further verifies the chemisorption mechanism, where the intense 164 ppm C═O peak provides direct evidence of carbamate formation (Fig. 4C). The observed peak differentiation before and after CO2 capture follows the same pattern regardless of the sorption conditions (whether thermally induced or humidity driven), indicating a uniform structural transformation upon CO2 capture (for full ss-NMR spectra, see Supplementary Materials, Section 4.3).

Fig. 4. Structural changes of BAETA during CO2 absorption.

Fig. 4.

(A) Proposed carbamate formation reaction of BAETA under CO2 capture conditions. (B) FTIR spectra of BAETA: after DAC (burgundy), after thermal CO2 capture at 150°C (purple), and lean BAETA (blue). (C) Solid-state 15N and 13C (carbonyl region only) CP/MAS NMR spectra of BAETA (blue) and BAETA-CO2 (magenta) using 1H-15N CP (left), 1H-13C CP (middle), and 1H-13C CP with 13C-labeled CO2 (right); full spectra in Supplementary Materials, Section 4.3. (D) Structure of BAETA-CO2 obtained by ED. Green lines between nitrogen and oxygen atoms indicates distances of hydrogen bonding (N─H···O) and are measured to be between 2.7 and 2.9 Å.

DISCUSSION

The chemical structure of this stable carbamate species was unambiguously determined by solving the crystal structure via ED (Supplementary Materials, Section 4.2). The molecule is asymmetric, with an ammonium group on one side and the carbamate on the other side, stabilized by four hydrogen bond donors by neighboring molecules (Fig. 4D). We hypothesize that the amide hydrogen bonding donors/acceptors of BAETA are crucial for the observed thermal and chemical stability of BAETA-CO2, as illustrated in many examples in amide-based organic materials (53, 54). To support our hypothesis that hydrogen bonding is crucial for CO2 capture at high temperatures, we synthesized a modified BAETA derivative where the two secondary amide groups were methylated to tertiary amides (Supplementary Materials, Section 6). This N-methylated BAETA (N-Me-BAETA) showed a maximum uptake of CO2 only up to 2.5 wt % at 150°C under 100% CO2 conditions, compared to 13 wt % CO2 uptake for BAETA under identical conditions (fig. S63). Although the thermal stability profiles were similar (fig. S2 for BAETA and fig. S62 for N-Me-BAETA), the methylated derivative showed degradation based on the NMR spectroscopic analysis after CO2 exposure (fig. S64). These findings highlight the critical role of secondary amide functional groups in the high-temperature CO2 capture and overall performance of BAETA.

Although the high stability of ammonium carbamate of BAETA implies high CO2 uptake at high temperatures, regeneration of BAETA with high thermal energy is also apparent. However, lower regeneration temperatures of our sorbents can be aided by pressure swing desorption and by using steam for large scale deployment (55, 56), as shown in a preliminary test with continuous carbon capture and desorption experiments using heated humid air (120° to 135°C; fig. S36). Depolymerization of PET using various amine nucleophiles offers an avenue to explore thermally stable organic amide-based materials. This approach addresses the limitations of small organic molecules for carbon capture—thermal decomposition and evaporative amine-solvent loss (57)—thus opening possibilities for CO2 capture at higher temperatures, which is crucial for industrial exhaust stream treatment (58). Nevertheless, it potentially provides an alternative and holistic solution to mitigate single-use plastic waste accumulation, by enhancing the value of end-of-life PET through an atom-economic upcycling process for scalable carbon dioxide capture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All chemicals, unless explicitly specified, were sourced from commercial suppliers and used as received. Carbon dioxide (CO2) was used directly from a cylinder with a purity of 99.7%, without any further treatment for reactions. The solvents used were HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography) grade. Analytical TLC (thin-layer chromatography) was conducted on precoated Merck DC-Alufolien SiO2 60 F254 TLC plates, which had a thickness of 0.2 mm. Liquid-state 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 500 and 126 MHz, respectively, on a Bruker Avance III spectrometer equipped with a Broad Band Fluorine–Observe (BBFO) probe. Chemical shifts (δ) were reported in parts per million (ppm), and coupling constants (J) were expressed in Hertz (Hz). The notation for NMR multiplicity included s (singlet), bs (broad singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), and m (multiplet). All ss-NMR analyses of natural abundance samples were performed at 16.4 T on a Bruker Avance II spectrometer equipped with a 4-mm HXY MAS probe at a 12-kHz MAS rate. Carbon spectra (1H-13C CP) were acquired with 1024 scans, a relaxation delay of 2.5 s, and an acquisition time of 50 ms. Nitrogen spectra (1H-15N CP) were acquired with 78,000 scans, a repetition delay of 3 s, and an acquisition time of 25 ms. For both, the CP was optimized on U-13C,15N l-alanine with a 30% ramp on the 13C or 15N radio frequency (rf) channel, respectively. Spinal64 was used for 1H decoupling during acquisition with an rf field strength of 100 kHz. The BAETA-13CO2 complex was analyzed at 16.4 T (700 MHz for 1H) on a Bruker Avance III HD spectrometer equipped with a 1.3-mm HCND probe at a 60-kHz MAS rate. A carbon spectrum (1H-13C CP) was acquired with 12.288 scans, a repetition delay of 3 s, and an acquisition time of 15 ms. The CP was optimized on U-13C,15N l-alanine with a 30% ramp on the 13C rf channel. Spinal64 was used for 1H decoupling during acquisition with an rf field strength of 142 kHz. Chemical shifts were calibrated indirectly through the adamantane peak observed at a low frequency (29.5 ppm relative to tetramethylsilane). FTIR spectra were recorded using a Bruker ALPHA-P FTIR spectrometer with a single-reflection attenuated total reflection (ATR) module. Electron microscopy images and 3D ED measurements were performed on a Rigaku XtaLAB Synergy-ED (59), equipped with a LaB6 source operating at 200 kV (λ = 0.0251 Å). Heat of absorption and reaction rate constants were determined by conducting calorimetry experiments using a heat flow instrument (TAM 2277, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). EN was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Drinking bottles were collected directly from end users. TGA was conducted using a Discovery TGA instrument from TA Instruments (New Castle, DE, USA). The samples were subjected to a constant nitrogen flow of 25 ml/min and heated in platinum TGA pans from room temperature to 600°C at a heating rate of 10°C/min. TGA results were analyzed to determine the thermal decomposition and the first derivative of TGA (dTGA) temperatures of the samples, using Trios v5.1.1.46572 software from TA Instruments. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis was carried out using a Discovery DSC instrument from TA Instruments (New Castle, USA). Samples weighing 4 to 5 mg were placed in Tzero aluminum pans with a perforated lid. Analyses were conducted under a nitrogen flow of 50 ml/min, with a linear heating rate of 10°C/min from 30° to 300°C.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the generous support from the Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen. We thank E. Gandolfo and A. A. Adelodun for the help on the project. We thank the NBI workshop, especially D. Westphal and K. Ahrenst for building homemade sorption setups. We thank Prof. P. Westh for the help with calorimetry, Prof. H. N. Bordallo for helping with TGA-MS and TGA-IR equipment, and Prof. T. Skrydstrup for helpful discussion. We acknowledge support from the Danish Center for Ultrahigh-Field NMR Spectroscopy funded by the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science and Novo Nordic Foundation Research Infrastructure–Large Equipment and Facilities. Electron diffraction experiments are supported by The Novo Nordisk Foundation Research Infrastructure grant to J. Bendix.

Funding: This work was supported by The Novo Nordisk Foundation CO2 Research Center (CORC) NNF21SA0072700, Carlsberg foundation (CF21-0308), Novo Nordisk Foundation Research Infrastructure grant (NNF220C0074439), Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science (AU-2010-612-181), and The Novo Nordisk Foundation Research Infrastructure–Large Equipment and Facilities (NNF220C0075797).

Author contributions: Conceptualization: M.P. and J.-W.L. Methodology: M.P., R.L., and J.-W.L. Investigation: M.P., R.L., P.I.G., D.W.J., K.L.O., N.C.N., A.L., and J.-W.L. Visualization: M.P., R.L., and J.-W.L. Funding acquisition: J.-W.L. Project administration: J.-W.L. Supervision: J.-W.L. Writing—original draft: M.P., R.L., and J.-W.L. Writing—review and editing: all authors.

Competing interests: M.P., R.L., and J.-W.L. filed a preliminary patent application (EP24210155.8). The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. CCDC 2406592 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures.

Supplementary Materials

This PDF file includes:

Supplementary Text

Tables S1 to S14

Figs. S1 to S64

References

sciadv.adv5906_sm.pdf (13.5MB, pdf)

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  • 1.Efimov M. N., Vasilev A. A., Muratov D. G., Kostev A. I., Kolesnikov E. A., Kiseleva S. G., Karpacheva G. P., Conversion of polyethylene terephthalate waste into high-yield porous carbon adsorbent via pyrolysis of dipotassium terephthalate. Waste Manag. 162, 113–122 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tournier V., Topham C. M., Gilles A., David B., Folgoas C., Moya-Leclair E., Kamionka E., Desrousseaux M. L., Texier H., Gavalda S., Cot M., Guémard E., Dalibey M., Nomme J., Cioci G., Barbe S., Chateau M., André I., Duquesne S., Marty A., An engineered PET depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles. Nature 580, 216–219 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barnard E., Rubio J., Thielemans W., Chemolytic depolymerisation of PET: A review. Green Chem. 23, 3765–3789 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lebreton L., Andrady A., Future scenarios of global plastic waste generation and disposal. Palgrave Commun. 5, 6 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Demetrious A., Crossin E., Life cycle assessment of paper and plastic packaging waste in landfill, incineration, and gasification-pyrolysis. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 21, 850–860 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bałazińska M., Kruczek M., Bondaruk J., The environmental impact of various forms of waste PET bottle management. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 28, 473–480 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Andreasi Bassi S., Tonini D., Saveyn H., Astrup T. F., Environmental and socioeconomic impacts of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) packaging management strategies in the EU. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 501–511 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Crippa M., Morico B., PET depolymerization: A novel process for plastic waste chemical recycling. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 179, 215–229 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vollmer I., Jenks M. J. F., Roelands M. C. P., White R. J., van Harmelen T., de Wild P. l., van der Laan G. P., Meirer F., Keurentjes J. T. F., Weckhuysen B. M., Beyond mechanical recycling: Giving new life to plastic waste. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 59, 15402–15423 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schyns Z. O. G., Shaver M. P., Mechanical recycling of packaging plastics: A review. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 42, 2000415 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang Y., Sharma S., Bernardo C. D., Rossi E., Lima R., Kamounah F. S., Poderyte M., Enemark-Rasmussen K., Ciancaleoni G., Lee J.-W., Catalytic fabric recycling: Glycolysis of blended PET with carbon dioxide and ammonia. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 11, 11294–11304 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Thiounn T., Smith R. C., Advances and approaches for chemical recycling of plastic waste. J. Polym. Sci. 58, 1347–1364 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shojaei B., Abtahi M., Najafi M., Chemical recycling of PET: A stepping-stone toward sustainability. Polym. Adv. Technol. 31, 2912–2938 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yoshida S., Hiraga K., Takehana T., Taniguchi I., Yamaji H., Maeda Y., Toyohara K., Miyamoto K., Kimura Y., Oda K., A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate). Science 351, 1196–1199 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.MacLeod M., Arp H. P. H., Tekman M. B., Jahnke A., The global threat from plastic pollution. Science 373, 61–65 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guselnikova O., Semyonov O., Sviridova E., Gulyaev R., Gorbunova A., Kogolev D., Trelin A., Yamauchi Y., Boukherroub R., Postnikov P., “Functional upcycling” of polymer waste towards the design of new materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 52, 4755–4832 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Armstrong McKay D. I., Staal A., Abrams J. F., Winkelmann R., Sakschewski B., Loriani S., Fetzer I., Cornell S. E., Rockström J., Lenton T. M., Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 377, eabn7950 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Matthews H. D., Wynes S., Current global efforts are insufficient to limit warming to 1.5°C. Science 376, 1404–1409 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Adun H., Ampah J. D., Bamisille O., Hu Y., The synergistic role of carbon dioxide removal and emission reductions in achieving the Paris Agreement goal. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 45, 386–407 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Deprez A., Leadley P., Dooley K., Williamson P., Cramer W., Gattuso J. P., Rankovic A., Carlson E. L., Creutzig F., Sustainability limits needed for CO2 removal. Science 383, 484–486 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shi X., Xiao H., Azarabadi H., Song J., Wu X., Chen X., Lackner K. S., Sorbents for the direct capture of CO2 from ambient air. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 59, 6984–7006 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li S., Cho M.-K., Lee K. B., Deng S., Zhao L., Yuan X., Wang J., Diamond in the rough: Polishing waste polyethylene terephthalate into activated carbon for CO2 capture. Sci. Total Environ. 834, 155262 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang J., Yuan X., Deng S., Zeng X., Yu Z., Li S., Li K., Waste polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastics-derived activated carbon for CO2 capture: A route to a closed carbon loop. Green Chem. 22, 6836–6845 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kaur B., Gupta R. K., Bhunia H., CO2 capture on activated carbon from PET (polyethylene terephthalate) waste: Kinetics and modeling studies. Chem. Eng. Commun. 207, 1031–1047 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ko Y., Azbell T. J., Milner P., Hinestroza J. P., Upcycling of dyed polyester fabrics into copper-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate (CuBDC) metal–organic frameworks. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 62, 5771–5781 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Panda D., Patra S., Awasthi M. K., Singh S. K., Lab cooked MOF for CO2 capture: A sustainable solution to waste management. J. Chem. Educ. 97, 1101–1108 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tawfik M. E., Ahmed N. M., Eskander S. B., Aminolysis of poly(ethylene terephthalate) wastes based on sunlight and utilization of the end product [bis(2-hydroxyethylene) terephthalamide] as an ingredient in the anticorrosive paints for the protection of steel structures. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 120, 2842–2855 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lorusso E., Feng Y., Schneider J., Kamps L., Parasothy N., Mayer-Gall T., Gutmann J. S., Ali W., Investigation of aminolysis routes on PET fabrics using different amine-based materials. Nano Sel. 3, 594–607 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hoang C. N., Dang Y. H., Aminolysis of poly(ethylene terephthalate) waste with ethylenediamine and characterization of α,ω-diamine products. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 98, 697–708 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fukushima K., Lecuyer J. M., Wei D. S., Horn H. W., Jones G. O., Al-Megren H. A., Alabdulrahman A. M., Alsewailem F. D., Mc Neil M. A., Rice J. E., Hedrick J. L., Advanced chemical recycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate) through organocatalytic aminolysis. Polym. Chem. 4, 1610–1616 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Achilias D. S., Tsintzou G. P., Nikolaidis A. K., Bikiaris D. N., Karayannidis G. P., Aminolytic depolymerization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) waste in a microwave reactor. Polym. Int. 60, 500–506 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ogiwara Y., Nomura K., Chemical upcycling of PET into a morpholine amide as a versatile synthetic building block. ACS Org. Inorg. Au 3, 377–383 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fukushima K., Jones G. O., Horn H. W., Rice J. E., Kato T., Hedrick J. L., Formation of bis-benzimidazole and bis-benzoxazole through organocatalytic depolymerization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and its mechanism. Polym. Chem. 11, 4904–4913 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Demarteau J., Olazabal I., Jehanno C., Sardon H., Aminolytic upcycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate) wastes using a thermally-stable organocatalyst. Polym. Chem. 11, 4875–4882 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jehanno C., Pérez-Madrigal M. M., Demarteau J., Sardon H., Dove A. P., Organocatalysis for depolymerisation. Polym. Chem. 10, 172–186 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Neerup R., Rasmussen V. E., Vinjarapu S. H. B., Larsen A. H., Shi M., Andersen C., Fuglsang K., Gram L. K., Nedenskov J., Kappel J., Blinksbjerg P., Jensen S., Karlsson J. L., Borgquist S., Jørsboe J. K., Villadsen S. N. B., Fosbøl P. L., Solvent degradation and emissions from a CO2 capture pilot at a waste-to-energy plant. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 11, 111411 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rochelle G. T., Thermal degradation of amines for CO2 capture. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 1, 183–190 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nguyen T., Hilliard M., Rochelle G. T., Amine volatility in CO2 capture. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 4, 707–715 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.F. Vega, M. Cano, S. Camino, L. M. G. Fernández, E. Portillo, B. Navarrete, in Carbon Dioxide Chemistry, Capture and Oil Recovery, K. Iyad, S. Janah, S. Hassan, Eds. (IntechOpen, 2018), chap. 8. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhou S., Chen X., Nguyen T., Voice A. K., Rochelle G. T., Aqueous ethylenediamine for CO2 capture. ChemSusChem 3, 913–918 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rabensteiner M., Rabensteiner M., Kinger G., Koller M., Gronald G., Hochenauer C., Pilot plant study of ethylenediamine as a solvent for post combustion carbon dioxide capture and comparison to monoethanolamine. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 27, 1–14 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hamdy L. B., Goel C., R.udd J., Barron A., Andreoli E., The application of amine-based materials for carbon capture and utilisation: An overarching view. Mater. Adv. 2, 5843–5880 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Leenders S. H. A. M., Pankratova G., Wijenberg J., Romanuka J., Gharavi F., Tsou J., Infantino M., van Haandel L., van Paasen S., Just P. E., Amine adsorbents stability for post-combustion CO2 capture: Determination and validation of laboratory degradation rates in a multi-staged fluidized bed pilot plant. ChemSusChem 16, e202300930 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hallenbeck A. P., Kitchin J. R., Effects of O2 and SO2 on the capture capacity of a primary-amine based polymeric CO2 sorbent. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 10788–10794 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Buijs W., Direct air capture of CO2 with an amine resin: A molecular modeling study of the oxidative deactivation mechanism with O2. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58, 17760–17767 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yu Q., Delgado J. P., Veneman R., Brilman D. W., Stability of a benzyl amine based CO2 capture adsorbent in view of regeneration strategies. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56, 3259–3269 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Keith D. W., Why capture CO2 from the atmosphere? Science 325, 1654–1655 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Siegelman R. L., Milner P. J., Forse A. C., Lee J. H., Colwell K. A., Neaton J. B., Reimer J. A., Weston S. C., Long J. R., Water enables efficient CO2 capture from natural gas flue emissions in an oxidation-resistant diamine-appended metal-organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 13171–13186 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chen O. I., Liu C. H., Wang K., Borrego-Marin E., Li H., Alawadhi A. H., Navarro J. A. R., Yaghi O. M., Water-enhanced direct air capture of carbon dioxide in metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 2835–2844 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shimon D., Chen C. H., Lee J. J., Didas S. A., Sievers C., Jones C. W., Hayes S. E., 15N solid state NMR spectroscopic study of surface amine groups for carbon capture: 3-aminopropylsilyl grafted to SBA-15 mesoporous silica. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 1488–1495 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chen C.-H., Shimon D., Lee J. J., Didas S. A., Mehta A. K., Sievers C., Jones C. W., Hayes S. E., Spectroscopic characterization of adsorbed 13CO2 on 3-aminopropylsilyl-modified SBA15 mesoporous silica. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 6553–6559 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mao H., Tang J., Day G. S., Peng Y., Wang H., Xiao X., Yang Y., Jiang Y., Chen S., Halat D. M., Lund A., Lv X., Zhang W., Yang C., Lin Z., Zhou H.-C., Pines A., Cui Y., Reimer J. A., A scalable solid-state nanoporous network with atomic-level interaction design for carbon dioxide capture. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo6849 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lee J.-W., Barin G., Peterson G. W., Xu J., Colwell K. A., Long J. R., A microporous amic acid polymer for enhanced ammonia capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 33504–33510 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Moraczewski A. L., Banaszynski L. A., From A. M., White C. E., Smith B. D., Using hydrogen bonding to control carbamate C−N rotamer equilibria. J. Org. Chem. 63, 7258–7262 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Keith D. W., Holmes G., St. Angelo D., Heidel K., A process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere. Joule 2, 1573–1594 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kumar S., Srivastava R., Koh J., Utilization of zeolites as CO2 capturing agents: Advances and future perspectives. J. CO2 Util. 41, 101251 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Luis P., Use of monoethanolamine (MEA) for CO2 capture in a global scenario: Consequences and alternatives. Desalination 380, 93–99 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rohde R. C., Carsch K. M., Dods M. N., Jiang H. Z. H., Isaac A. R. M., Klein R. A., Kwon H., Karstens S. L., Wang Y., Huang A. J., Taylor J. W., Yabuuchi Y., Tkachenko N. V., Meihaus K. R., Furukawa H., Yahne D. R., Engler K. E., Bustillo K. C., Minor A. M., Reimer J. A., Head-Gordon M., Brown C. M., Long J. R., High-temperature carbon dioxide capture in a porous material with terminal zinc hydride sites. Science 386, 814–819 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ito S., White F., Okunishi E., Aoyama Y., Yamano A., Sato H., Ferrara J., Jasnowski M., Meyer M., Structure determination of small molecule compounds by an electron diffractometer for 3D ED/MicroED. CrystEngComm 23, 8622–8630 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.R. Socolow, M. Desmond, R. Aines, J. Blackstock, O. Bolland, T. Kaarsberg, N. Lewis, M. Mazzotti, A. Pfeffer, K. Sawyer, J. Siirola, B. Smit, J. Wilcox, “Direct air capture of CO2 with chemicals: A technology assessment for the APS Panel on Public Affairs” (American Physical Society, 2011).
  • 61.Rigaku Corporation, CrysAlisPro, ver. 171.44.56a and 171.44.80a (Rigaku Oxford Diffraction Ltd., 2024).
  • 62.Sheldrick G. M., SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. A 71, 3–8 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sheldrick G. M., Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. C 71, 3–8 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hübschle C. B., Sheldrick G. M., Dittrich B., ShelXle: A Qt graphical user interface for SHELXL. J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1281–1284 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dolomanov O. V., Bourhis L. J., Gildea R. J., Howard J. A. K., Puschmann H., OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Peng L.-M., Electron atomic scattering factors and scattering potentials of crystals. Micron 30, 625–648 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Groom C. R., Bruno I. J., Lightfoot M. P., Ward S. C., The Cambridge Structural Database. Acta Crystallogr. B 72, 171–179 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bednarek G., Nowak M., Kusz J., Ossowski J., XRD multi-temperatures study of N,N’-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)benzene-1,4-dicarboxamide. Solid State Phenom. 163, 256 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kratzert D., Krossing I., Recent improvements in DSR. J. Appl. Cryst. 51, 928–934 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Su F., Lu C., Chen H. S., Adsorption, desorption, and thermodynamic studies of CO2 with high-amine-loaded multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Langmuir 27, 8090–8098 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.G. Göttlicher, “The Energetics of Carbon Dioxide Capture in Power Plants” (National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2004).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Text

Tables S1 to S14

Figs. S1 to S64

References

sciadv.adv5906_sm.pdf (13.5MB, pdf)

Articles from Science Advances are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Advancement of Science

RESOURCES