Table 2.
Comparative evaluation of outcomes between the 2 methods of endometrial preparation using HRC and mNC
| Variables | Group | P-value | |
| mNC-FET group | HRC group | ||
| HCG positive rate# | 25/56 (44.6) | 27/63 (42.9) | 0.845 |
| Biochemical pregnancy rate# | 4/56 (7.1) | 6/63 (9.5) | 0.640 |
| Implantation rate# | 22/102 (21.5) | 21/112 (18.7) | 0.602 |
| Clinical pregnancy rate# | 21/56 (37.5) | 18/63 (28.6) | 0.282 |
| Ongoing pregnancy rate# | 20/56 (35.7) | 16 /63 (25.4) | 0.221 |
| Ectopic pregnancy rate# | 0/56 (0) | 2/63 (3.2) | 0.497 |
| Twin pregnancy rate# | 1/56 (1.8) | 2/63 (3.2) | 0.999 |
| Early miscarriage rate# | 1/21 (4.8) | 2/18 (11.1) | 0.634 |
| Cycle cancellation rate# | 5/61 (8.2) | 1/64 (1.6) | 0.109 |
| Number of visit## | 2.80 0.51 3 (2.25–3) | 3.17 0.58 3 (3–3) | 0.001* |
| #Data presented as n (%), Chi-square test. ##Data presented as Mean SD and MD (IQR), Mann-Whitney U test. *Significant at the level of 0.05. HCG: Human chorionic gonadotropin, mNC: Modified natural cycle, HRC: Hormone replacement cycle, FET: frozen-thawed embryo transfer | |||