Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2025 Sep 6;24(9):e70432. doi: 10.1111/jocd.70432

Skinspan: A Holistic Roadmap for Extending Skin Longevity With Evidence‐Based Interventions

Elizabeth Kream 1,, Sabrina G Fabi 1, Monica Boen 1
PMCID: PMC12413659  PMID: 40913411

ABSTRACT

Background

With the rise of regenerative medicine and geroscience, translational research has shifted focus from lifespan to healthspan—years lived in good health. Applied to aesthetic medicine, the authors introduce the concept of “skinspan,” to both describe the period during which skin maintains a youthful, healthy appearance, and additionally to serve as a tool for the cosmetic consult.

Aims

The aim of this comprehensive review is to illuminate “skinspan” as a framework for guiding long‐term skin health. The authors review the molecular drivers of skin aging along with appraise current evidence‐based interventions and synthesize evidence into an algorithm to expand skin span.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review was conducted to examine the molecular hallmarks of skin aging: genomic instability, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence, and proteostasis decline, and how they are targeted by lifestyle modifications, pharmacologic agents, and aesthetic procedures. Each intervention discussed in this paper is categorized based on the strength of the available evidence for augmenting skinspan.

Results

Proactive interventions, including lifestyle interventions, topical agents, systemic therapies, and noninvasive procedures, show promise in mitigating aging mechanisms and preserving skin health. We recommend a first‐line strategy of sun protection, topical retinoids, and antioxidants. Second‐line interventions include laser and energy‐based devices. Clinicians may also consider emerging therapies—including stem cell–based treatments, sirtuins, nicotinamide, and natural SIRT activators—as adjunctive third‐line add‐ons, while continuing to monitor the evolving evidence base.

Conclusion

The skinspan framework offers a holistic, evidence‐based approach to skin longevity, promoting prevention, continuity of care, and patient education beyond isolated aesthetic interventions. To expand skinspan based on current evidence, we recommend a first‐line approach of sun protection, topical retinoids, and antioxidants. Second‐line interventions include procedures such as laser and energy‐based devices. Clinicians may also consider emerging therapies—including stem cell–based treatments, sirtuins, nicotinamide, and natural SIRT activators—as adjunctive third‐line add‐ons, while continuing to monitor the evolving evidence base. A need exists for more randomized controlled trial studies to strengthen the evidence base.

1. Introduction

As the body's largest organ, the skin serves not only as a protective barrier against environmental insults but also as a visible indicator of health, vitality, and age. Skin aging presents with phenotypic changes such as rhytides, dyspigmentation, laxity, thinning, and increased vulnerability to neoplasms. These phenotypic skin changes are underpinned by an interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, all of which converge on shared molecular pathways that disrupt skin homeostasis over time.

Establishing the molecular drivers of aging has led to a shift in medicine from prioritizing lifespan, the total years lived, to healthspan, defined as the number of years lived in good health and free of significant morbidity. Building on this paradigm, the concept of skinspan describes the period of youthful, healthy skin, with Figure 1 illustrating how interventions may prolong it. While the term ‘skinspan’ has been coined in informal contexts, to our knowledge, this publication represents the first instance of the term being introduced in peer‐reviewed literature, accompanied by recommendations for its integration into clinical practice. This paper reviews core molecular mechanisms of skin aging along with how these hallmarks are targeted through proactive interventions, altogether extending skinspan.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Skinspan refers to the preservation of skin health and appearance relative to chronological age, which may be optimized through lifestyle, medical, and procedural factors.

2. Molecular Hallmarks of Skin Aging

The molecular signatures of skin aging unfold in a progressive sequence: damage is induced at the cellular level, cells respond to this damage through adaptive or maladaptive mechanisms, and eventually these responses culminate in a senescent, dysfunctional tissue phenotype.

2.1. Damage Accumulates: Genomic Instability, Telomere Attrition, and Loss of Proteostasis

The initial stage of skin aging, on a molecular level, is heralded by damage induction. Skin cells face constant assaults from ultraviolet radiation (UVR), pollution, metabolic byproducts, and internal replication errors. These stressors lead to point mutations, strand breaks, and mitochondrial DNA damage, all of which contribute to the deterioration of cellular function [1]. Telomere attrition, driven by decreased telomerase activity, leads to a loss of chromosomal protection and triggers cellular senescence [1]. Simultaneously, the decline of proteostasis results in the accumulation of damaged proteins and advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which stiffen the dermal matrix [1, 2]. This sets the stage for progressive cellular dysfunction.

2.2. Damage Control Declines: Mitochondrial Exhaustion and Cellular Senescence

Compensatory mechanisms designed to defend against damage become overwhelmed and defective with age. Defective mitochondrial polymerase leads to a premature aging phenotype seen in murine models [3]. Senescent fibroblasts reduce their production of insulin‐like growth factor 1 (IGF‐1), a hormone that signals keratinocytes to repair from UV‐induced DNA damage [4]. Consequently, it can be generally stated that changes in the aged skin occur in the dermis and between the epidermis and the dermis.

2.3. Senescent Skin: The Rise of “Zombie Cells” and Inflammaging

Senescent cells adopt a pro‐inflammatory secretory profile known as the senescence‐associated secretory phenotype (SASP), characterized by cytokines such as interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF‐α) [5]. The SASP induces senescence in neighboring cells—a domino effect that has led to the term “zombie cells” being ascribed to senescent cells [5]. In the skin, an increase in senescent cells, such as melanocytes, is associated with wrinkling and higher perceived age [6]. Tissue enters an “inflammaging” state, observed in aging skin but also in age‐related diseases such as cancer, atherosclerosis, and diabetes [5].

3. Lifestyle Factors That Support Skinspan

3.1. Photoprotection

UVR is the main extrinsic driver of skin aging, responsible for 80% to 90% of facial aging [7, 8]. UVB causes epidermal DNA damage and sunburn, while deeper‐penetrating UVA has deleterious effects on fibroblast gene expression [9]. Shorter wavelengths (410–420 nm) are also toxic to fibroblasts and promote aberrant melanogenesis via reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, transforming growth factor beta (TGF‐β), and matrix metalloproteinase‐1 (MMP‐1) upregulation [10, 11, 12].

In addition to protective clothing and avoiding peak hours of sun exposure, sunscreens suppress UVA‐induced oxidative and inflammatory gene expression in keratinocytes and fibroblasts, with broad‐spectrum UVA/UVB filters offering better protection across all skin phototypes than UVB‐only formulations [13]. Photoprotection is a well‐established first‐line intervention; however, clinicians may find it challenging to stratify second‐ and third‐line recommendations. The authors synthesize the published literature into an algorithm (Figure 2) that encompasses first‐line therapies through emerging interventions, their appraisal of which ensues.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Based on current evidence, we propose this algorithm as a practical tool for clinicians to use during the cosmetic consultation.

3.2. Smoking Avoidance and Cessation

Cigarette smoke accelerates skin aging by inducing oxidative stress, impairing fibroblast function, and disrupting autophagy [14]. Carcinogens in the smoke exhibit phototoxic properties in vitro [15]. While avoidance is ideal, quitting smoking at any age has been associated with improved skin health and reversal of biological skin aging markers [16].

3.3. Pollution Control

Airborne pollutants, such as particulate matter (PM), gases, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), contribute to DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and impaired autophagy in skin cells [17]. Epidemiologic and mechanistic studies link pollution to pigmentary changes and wrinkle formation [18, 19, 20]. One study introduced the term “environment‐induced lentigines”, Highlighting the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) signaling pathway's role in pollution and UV‐induced pigmentation via keratinocyte–melanocyte–fibroblast crosstalk [18].

Mitigation strategies include daily cleansing, avoiding outdoor activity during peak pollution, and reducing indoor VOCs by repairing leaks and using low‐VOC products. Because pollution and UVR have compounding effects, sun protection is paramount. Antioxidant‐containing topicals and potential AHR modulators may reduce pollution‐induced inflammation and the SASP production [20, 21].

3.4. Diet

Caloric restriction (CR) is one of the most studied lifestyle interventions to extend healthspan; in animal models, CR has been associated with decreased collagen glycation [22], enhanced hair follicle stem cell activity [23], and reduced wrinkle formation [24]. It is important to note that glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1) treatment, increasingly popular for weight loss and weight management, and associated with CR, have been associated with accelerated facial aging due to loss of dermal and subcutaneous fat, altered adipose‐derived stem cell (ADSC) proliferation, and hormonal influences [25, 26].

Limiting dietary glucose and galactose, along with avoiding cooking methods like grilling, frying, and roasting, reduces AGE formation, while steaming and boiling are associated with reduced levels [27].

Antioxidant‐rich diets, such as the Mediterranean diet, lower C‐reactive protein and TNF‐α, and support a diverse gut microbiome—both of which contribute to improved skin and overall health [28, 29]. Among dietary antioxidants, polyphenols, found in fruits, vegetables, dark chocolate, green tea, and spices, confer ROS scavenging and anti‐glycation properties [25, 30].

3.5. Sleep

Sleep plays a critical role in cellular repair, DNA restoration, and mitochondrial recovery. Circadian disruption impairs hair cycling and weakens the skin barrier [31]. A study in adults aged 69 to 86 found that sleep deprivation elevated molecular markers of skin aging, including the SASP [32]. In mice, melatonin supplementation restored skin health by normalizing circadian rhythms in the gut microbiome, increasing propionic acid, a key mediator of the gut–skin axis [33].

3.6. Exercise

Skeletal muscle functions as an endocrine organ, secreting “myokines.” One myokine, IL‐15, may play a role in preserving skin integrity; mice lacking muscle mass show skin deterioration that can be reversed with recombinant IL‐15 [34].

Exercise also reduces pro‐inflammatory cytokines and increases protective factors like IGF‐1 [35]. A 16‐week study of middle‐aged women found both aerobic and resistance training improved extracellular matrix‐related gene expression, elasticity, and dermal thickness [36]. Regular physical activity also reduced stratum corneum thinning and increased regulators of mitochondrial biogenesis [34].

3.7. Mainstay Medical Interventions: Retinoids and Vitamin C

Topical retinoids promote collagen synthesis and epidermal renewal by activating nuclear receptors that regulate gene expression involved in skin structure and repair. Retinoic acid, the active form of vitamin A, is more potent than its precursor retinol, which requires metabolic conversion before receptor activation. Consistent use decreases MMPs and increases collagen type I (COL1) production. In a vehicle‐controlled human study, tretinoin 0.1% cream led to an 80% increase in COL1 formation in photodamaged skin, exhibiting a restorative potential [37].

Vitamin C, particularly in its most studied form, L‐ascorbic acid, enhances skin health through multiple mechanisms: ROS scavenging, tyrosinase inhibition to reduce hyperpigmentation, genomic safeguarding through methylation reversal, and serving as a cofactor for collagen‐stabilizing enzymes [38]. Topical application is more effective than oral supplementation, but formulation with stabilizing carriers is essential. In clinical studies, topical ascorbic acid reduced UVA/UVB‐induced TNF‐α and IL‐1β expression [39] and showed a synergistic benefit when combined with sunscreen in suppressing MMP‐1 expression [40]. Vitamin C also mitigates oxidative skin damage from ozone exposure [41].

3.8. Sex Hormones

Hormonal changes associated with menopause and andropause significantly affect skin physiology, contributing to dryness, reduced elasticity, and dermal thinning. Two randomized controlled trials (RTCs) found that 24 weeks of topical estradiol application increased fibroblast numbers and boosted COL1 and COL3 [42, 43]. However, a shorter study with a 30‐day duration did not observe significant effects, suggesting duration and formulation may influence outcomes [44, 45].

Emerging evidence supports the role of oxytocin (OT) in modulating skin aging, particularly in women. A recent in vitro study investigated the effects of OT on human dermal fibroblasts derived from women of different ages [44, 45]. OT suppressed SASP‐induced senescence, and this effect correlated with the hypermethylation of the OT receptor gene in older donors [44, 45]. A double‐blinded RTC of 40 women evaluated a topical formulation of peptides and botanical actives exhibiting OT and pheromone‐like effects, applied over a 4 to 8‐week period [46]. The active group demonstrated a significant 3‐year reduction in perceived skin age [46].

3.9. Melatonin

Melatonin, a hormone best known for regulating circadian rhythms, activates sirtuins, inhibits toll‐like receptor 4 signaling, and reduces pro‐inflammatory cytokines associated with inflammaging [47, 48, 49]. Both topical and oral melatonin supplementation resulted in an improvement in androgenetic alopecia [50]. Studies show melatonin's role in downregulating MMP‐1 and the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway, thereby restoring dermal collagen and elastic fibers [51]. mTOR is a nutrient‐sensing pathway critical for cell growth. When mTOR is overactive, it promotes the accumulation of misfolded proteins and impairs autophagy. Additionally, melatonin protects melanocytes from UVB‐induced pigmentation [52].

3.10. Peptides

Bioactive peptides are short amino acid sequences that modulate molecular pathways tied to skin structure and repair. Categories include carrier peptides (e.g., GHK‐Cu), signaling peptides (e.g., tripeptide‐29, matrixyl), enzyme inhibitors, and neurotransmitter‐affecting peptides. Advances in computational screening have accelerated peptide discovery for skin applications. In vitro, ex vivo, and human clinical trials found that the carrier peptide GHK‐Cu, in particular, promotes collagen synthesis, reduces MMPs, and restores expression of stem cell markers such as integrins and p63 [53, 54, 55]. A topical nonapeptide prevented UVA‐induced photoaging in mouse models by suppressing oxidative stress, preserving mitochondrial function, and maintaining autophagy [56].

3.11. Stem Cells and Exosome‐Based Therapeutics

Stem cell–based therapies, particularly ADSCs and mesenchymal stem cells, exert their beneficial effects on skin aging through paracrine signaling—secreting cytokines, growth factors, and matrix‐remodeling enzymes that enhance fibroblast function and dermal architecture. ADSCs have been shown in vitro and in vivo to reduce AGEs, modulate UVB‐induced stress pathways, and upregulate collagen synthesis [56, 57]. Clinical studies using autologous lipoaspirates rich in ADSCs showed improvements in skin texture and wrinkle depth after intradermal injection [58]. Plant stem cells, while structurally distinct, have demonstrated regenerative potential in in vivo and clinical trials of topical formulations by mitigating oxidative stress, inflammaging, and fibroblast senescence [59, 60].

Exosomes, nano‐sized extracellular vesicles secreted by all cells, including stem cells, are gaining traction for their ability to deliver bioactive molecules without the complexities of live cell therapy. In vitro and in vivo studies of a topical formulation of exosomes from human umbilical vein endothelial cells and hypoxia‐induced ADSCs enhanced fibroblast proliferation, increased COL1 and COL3 levels, and reduced MMP‐1 expression [61, 62]. In the study utilizing hypoxia conditions, this enhances the natural niche for stem cells and therefore increases exosome yield.

Initial human trials, primarily investigating topical formulations of exosome applied after procedures, demonstrate efficacy in treating skin aging, scarring, melasma, and hair loss, as well as showing potential in inflammatory and pigmentary skin diseases [63]. A 12‐week clinical trial with human participants found topical application of platelet‐derived exosomes reduced markers of cellular senescence and telomere damage [64]. Another in vitro study investigating fibroblast‐conditioned media developed under hypoxic conditions found an upregulation of autophagy and stem cell genes, with correlating clinical improvements noted in collagen and elastin content, wrinkles, sagging, and photodamage [65].

3.12. Sirtuins, NAD+, and Natural SIRT Activators

Sirtuins (SIRTs) are oxidized nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)‐dependent deacetylases central to cellular longevity, DNA repair, and apoptosis regulation. SIRT1 and SIRT6 are particularly relevant to skin aging. Because SIRT activity depends on NAD+, age‐related declines in NAD+ impair these protective pathways. Nicotinamide supplementation has been shown to extend fibroblast lifespan, enhance collagen production, and reduce ROS in vitro and ex vivo studies [66, 67].

A 2023 review of preclinical and clinical evidence on NAD+ highlights promising early clinical evidence, including reduced risk of nonmelanotic skin cancers and precancers with oral nicotinamide; however, concerns remain that elevated NAD+ levels may support cancer cell metabolism via enhanced glycolysis and potentially upregulate the SASP [68]. While oral NAD+ precursors lack clear evidence for improving skin aging endpoints, a study of a topical nicotinic acid derivative applied over 4 to 6 weeks increased skin NAD levels and improved multiple markers in photodamaged skin [69].

Natural SIRT activators such as resveratrol, honokiol, lycopene, and cordyceps sinensis extract have all displayed skin antiaging effects through increasing sirtuin expression and NAD+ synthesis in several in vitro and clinical trials [70, 71, 72, 73].

3.13. Senotherapeutics

Senolytics eliminate senescent cells via apoptosis, while senomorphs suppress the SASP and support tissue homeostasis. Dasatinib, a senolytic, has shown to selectively clear senescent fibroblasts and improve fibrosis in preclinical skin models [70]. Rapamycin (sirolimus), an mTOR inhibitor with senomorphic properties, has demonstrated an ability to reduce senescent markers and increase markers of dermal youthfulness, with supporting evidence from in vitro and ex vivo studies, and most notably from the first clinical trial evaluating topical rapamycin in photodamaged human subjects [74, 75, 76]. Another senomorph, metformin, was found to promote fibroblast survival and hair regeneration in both in vitro and in vivo models [77, 78, 79].

3.14. Nonsurgical Aesthetic Intervention: Lasers, Light‐Based Therapies, and Injectables

Minimally invasive procedures, especially when combined, are foundational in a skin aging regimen. Intense pulsed light enhances fibroblast activity and boosts pro‐COL1/3 and elastin production via photothermal and cytokine‐triggered mechanisms [80]. Fractionated CO₂ laser has been shown to upregulate TGF‐β, heat shock proteins, and COL1 while suppressing MMP‐13 expression, improving both photoaging and skin carcinogenesis markers in preclinical and clinical studies [81, 82]. 1064 nm laser activates rejuvenation pathways in both fibroblasts and keratinocytes, increasing heat shock proteins, procollagens, and TIMPs, while reducing aging‐associated markers [83]. Radiofrequency microneedling induces TGF‐β expression and dermal remodeling proteins including tropoelastin and fibrillin. Poly‐L‐lactic acid, a biostimulatory filler, activates the TGF‐β/Smad pathway to promote procollagen and elastin production [8].

3.15. Photobiomodulation (PBM)

PBM utilizes red (590–660 nm) and near‐infrared light, enhances mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase activity to promote cellular repair, similar to photosynthesis in plants. While concerns exist about whether PBM is a friend or foe in the context of skin aging, exposure to appropriate doses may offer photoprotection against harmful UV radiation, potentially preconditioning the skin [84]. In a split‐face RCT involving 137 women, 10 sessions of red and amber PBM over 4 weeks led to visible improvements in periocular wrinkle depth and skin texture [85]. A study investigating infrared radiation, involving both in vitro and human in vivo groups, found a significant increase in collagen and elastin production proportional to the duration of irradiation exposure [86]. Proteomic data analysis of skin response to PBM revealed increased collagen and elastin levels, and reduced MMPs, indicating activation of fibroblasts and keratinocytes [87].

4. Conclusion

We coin the concept of skinspan to serve as a framework for extending the period of youthful skin, and with emerging interventions, potentially reverse signs of aging. The term and Figures can be recruited as a concrete tool during the cosmetic consultation to clearly stratify interventions for patients. In contrast to fragmented reactive treatments leading to perception drift, the skinspan model serves as a skin aging roadmap, steeped in evidence‐based therapies and a trusted relationship between the unique patient and their trusted clinician. Our algorithm, illustrated in Figure 2, outlines a practical approach to expanding skinspan based on current evidence. We recommend a first‐line strategy of sun protection, topical retinoids, and antioxidants. Second‐line interventions include laser and energy‐based devices. Clinicians may also consider emerging therapies—including stem cell‐based treatments, sirtuins, nicotinamide, and natural SIRT activators—as adjunctive third‐line add‐ons, while continuing to keep a pulse on the evolving evidence base. Skinspan also illuminates the synergism of procedural, medical, and lifestyle interventions, many of which confer benefits beyond the skin. Building on the canon of in vitro and in vivo studies, more randomized clinical trials are needed to strengthen the evidence base, especially as new therapeutic candidates continue to emerge.

Disclosure

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

Elizabeth Kream and Monica Boen: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Sabrina G. Fabi, M, serves as a consultant for AbbVie, Galderma, Merz, and Revance, and receives research funding or serves as an investigator for AbbVie, Caliway, Galderma, Merz, Teoxane, Tigermed, and Symatase. She is also the co‐founder of XOMD skincare. These roles did not influence the design, writing, or interpretation of this manuscript.

Kream E., Fabi S. G., and Boen M., “Skinspan: A Holistic Roadmap for Extending Skin Longevity With Evidence‐Based Interventions,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 24, no. 9 (2025): e70432, 10.1111/jocd.70432.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in PubMed at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.

References

  • 1. Jin S., Li K., Zong X., Eun S., Morimoto N., and Guo S., “Hallmarks of Skin Aging: Update,” Aging and Disease 14, no. 6 (2023): 2167–2176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chen C. Y., Zhang J. Q., Li L., et al., “Advanced Glycation End Products in the Skin: Molecular Mechanisms, Methods of Measurement, and Inhibitory Pathways,” Frontiers in Medicine 9 (2022): 837222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Trifunovic A., Wredenberg A., Falkenberg M., et al., “Premature Ageing in Mice Expressing Defective Mitochondrial DNA Polymerase,” Nature 429, no. 6990 (2004): 417–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kemp M. G., Spandau D. F., and Travers J. B., “Impact of Age and Insulin‐Like Growth Factor‐1 on DNA Damage Responses in UV‐Irradiated Human Skin,” Molecules 22, no. 3 (2017): 356, 10.3390/molecules22030356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sanada F., Taniyama Y., Muratsu J., et al., “Source of Chronic Inflammation in Aging,” Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 5 (2018): 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Waaijer M. E. C., Gunn D. A., Adams P. D., et al., “P16INK4a Positive Cells in Human Skin Are Indicative of Local Elastic Fiber Morphology, Facial Wrinkling, and Perceived Age,” Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 71, no. 8 (2016): 1022–1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. de Moura J. P., de Moura Fernandes É. P., Lustoza Rodrigues T. C. M., et al., “Targets Involved in Skin Aging and Photoaging and Their Possible Inhibitors: A Mini‐Review,” Current Drug Targets 24, no. 10 (2023): 797–815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zhu W. and Dong C., “Poly‐L‐Lactic Acid Increases Collagen Gene Expression and Synthesis in Cultured Dermal Fibroblast (Hs68) Through the TGF‐β/Smad Pathway,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 22, no. 4 (2023): 1213–1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Marionnet C., Tricaud C., and Bernerd F., “Exposure to Non‐Extreme Solar UV Daylight: Spectral Characterization, Effects on Skin and Photoprotection,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 1 (2014): 68–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Opländer C., Hidding S., Werners F. B., Born M., Pallua N., and Suschek C. V., “Effects of Blue Light Irradiation on Human Dermal Fibroblasts,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology. B 103, no. 2 (2011): 118–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Pourang A., Tisack A., Ezekwe N., et al., “Effects of Visible Light on Mechanisms of Skin Photoaging,” Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine 38, no. 3 (2022): 191–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ge G., Wang Y., Xu Y., et al., “Induced Skin Aging by Blue‐Light Irradiation in Human Skin Fibroblasts via TGF‐β, JNK and EGFR Pathways,” Journal of Dermatological Science 111, no. 2 (2023): 52–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Moyal D., “Need for a Well‐Balanced Sunscreen to Protect Human Skin From Both Ultraviolet A and Ultraviolet B Damage,” Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology 78, no. Suppl 1 (2012): S24–S30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Vij N., Chandramani‐Shivalingappa P., Van Westphal C., Hole R., and Bodas M., “Cigarette Smoke‐Induced Autophagy Impairment Accelerates Lung Aging, COPD‐Emphysema Exacerbations and Pathogenesis,” American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology 314, no. 1 (2018): C73–C87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Chuang C. H. and Hu M. L., “Synergistic DNA Damage and Lipid Peroxidation in Cultured Human White Blood Cells Exposed to 4‐(Methyl‐Nitrosamino)‐1‐(3‐Pyridyl)‐1‐Butanone and Ultraviolet A,” Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 47, no. 2 (2006): 73–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Serri R., Romano M. C., and Sparavigna A., ““Quitting Smoking Rejuvenates the Skin”: Results of a Pilot Project on Smoking Cessation Conducted in Milan, Italy,” Skinmed 8, no. 1 (2010): 23–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Diao P., He H., Tang J., Xiong L., and Li L., “Natural Compounds Protect the Skin From Airborne Particulate Matter by Attenuating Oxidative Stress,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 138 (2021): 111534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nakamura M., Morita A., SeitÉ S., Haarmann‐Stemmann T., Grether‐Beck S., and Krutmann J., “Environment‐Induced Lentigines: Formation of Solar Lentigines Beyond Ultraviolet Radiation,” Experimental Dermatology 24, no. 6 (2015): 407–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Jux B., Kadow S., Luecke S., Rannug A., Krutmann J., and Esser C., “The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Mediates UVB Radiation‐Induced Skin Tanning,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 131, no. 1 (2011): 203–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Flament F., Bourokba N., Nouveau S., Li J., and Charbonneau A., “A Severe Chronic Outdoor Urban Pollution Alters Some Facial Aging Signs in Chinese Women. A Tale of Two Cities,” International Journal of Cosmetic Science 40, no. 5 (2018): 467–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Tigges J., Haarmann‐Stemmann T., Vogel C. F. A., et al., “The New Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Antagonist E/Z‐2‐Benzylindene‐5,6‐Dimethoxy‐3,3‐Dimethylindan‐1‐One Protects Against UVB‐Induced Signal Transduction,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 134, no. 2 (2014): 556–559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Sell D. R., Lane M. A., Obrenovich M. E., et al., “The Effect of Caloric Restriction on Glycation and Glycoxidation in Skin Collagen of Nonhuman Primates,” Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 58, no. 6 (2003): 508–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Umbayev B., Askarova S., Almabayeva A., Saliev T., Masoud A. R., and Bulanin D., “Galactose‐ Induced Skin Aging: The Role of Oxidative Stress,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2020 (2020): 7145656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bhattacharyya T. K., Hsia Y., Weeks D. M., Dixon T. K., Lepe J., and Thomas J. R., “Association of Diet With Skin Histological Features in UV‐B‐Exposed Mice,” JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery 19, no. 5 (2017): 399–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ridha Z., Fabi S. G., Zubar R., and Dayan S. H., “Decoding the Implications of Glucagon‐Like Peptide‐1 Receptor Agonists on Accelerated Facial and Skin Aging,” Aesthetic Surgery Journal 44, no. 11 (2024): NP809–NP818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lee H. M., Joo B. S., Lee C. H., Kim H. Y., Ock J. H., and Lee Y. S., “Effect of Glucagon‐Like Peptide‐1 on the Differentiation of Adipose‐Derived Stem Cells Into Osteoblasts and Adipocytes,” Developmental Reproduction 19, no. 3 (2015): 167–174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nguyen H. P. and Katta R., “Sugar Sag: Glycation and the Role of Diet in Aging Skin,” Skin Therapy Letter 20, no. 6 (2015): 1–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Di Giosia P., Stamerra C. A., Giorgini P., Jamialahamdi T., Butler A. E., and Sahebkar A., “The Role of Nutrition in Inflammaging,” Ageing Research Reviews 77 (2022): 101596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Ghosh T. S., Rampelli S., Jeffery I. B., et al., “Mediterranean Diet Intervention Alters the Gut Microbiome in Older People Reducing Frailty and Improving Health Status: The NU‐AGE 1‐ Year Dietary Intervention Across Five European Countries,” Gut 69, no. 7 (2020): 1218–1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Rudrapal M., Khairnar S. J., Khan J., et al., “Dietary Polyphenols and Their Role in Oxidative Stress‐Induced Human Diseases: Insights Into Protective Effects, Antioxidant Potentials and Mechanism(s) of Action,” Frontiers in Pharmacology 13 (2022): 806470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Geyfman M., Kumar V., Liu Q., et al., “Brain and Muscle Arnt‐Like Protein‐1 (BMAL1) Controls Circadian Cell Proliferation and Susceptibility to UVB‐Induced DNA Damage in the Epidermis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, no. 29 (2012): 11758–11763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Carroll J. E., Cole S. W., Seeman T. E., et al., “Partial Sleep Deprivation Activates the DNA Damage Response (DDR) and the Senescence‐Associated Secretory Phenotype (SASP) in Aged Adult Humans,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 51 (2016): 223–229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Li W., Wang Z., Cao J., Dong Y., and Chen Y., “Melatonin Improves Skin Barrier Damage Caused by Sleep Restriction Through Gut Microbiota,” Journal of Pineal Research 75, no. 1 (2023): e12874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Crane J. D., MacNeil L. G., Lally J. S., et al., “Exercise‐Stimulated Interleukin‐15 Is Controlled by AMPK and Regulates Skin Metabolism and Aging,” Aging Cell 14, no. 4 (2015): 625–634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Pedersen B. K., Akerström T. C. A., Nielsen A. R., and Fischer C. P., “Role of Myokines in Exercise and Metabolism,” Journal of Applied Physiology 103, no. 3 (2007): 1093–1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Nishikori S., Yasuda J., Murata K., et al., “Resistance Training Rejuvenates Aging Skin by Reducing Circulating Inflammatory Factors and Enhancing Dermal Extracellular Matrices,” Scientific Reports 13, no. 1 (2023): 10214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Griffiths C. E., Russman A. N., Majmudar G., Singer R. S., Hamilton T. A., and Voorhees J. J., “Restoration of Collagen Formation in Photodamaged Human Skin by Tretinoin (Retinoic Acid),” New England Journal of Medicine 329, no. 8 (1993): 530–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Minor E. A., Court B. L., Young J. I., and Wang G., “Ascorbate Induces Ten‐Eleven Translocation (Tet) Methylcytosine Dioxygenase‐Mediated Generation of 5‐Hydroxymethylcytosine,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 288, no. 19 (2013): 13669–13674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Serrano G., AlmudÉver P., Serrano J. M., et al., “Phosphatidylcholine Liposomes as Carriers to Improve Topical Ascorbic Acid Treatment of Skin Disorders,” Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 8 (2015): 591–599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Grether‐Beck S., Marini A., Jaenicke T., and Krutmann J., “Effective Photoprotection of Human Skin Against Infrared A Radiation by Topically Applied Antioxidants: Results From a Vehicle Controlled, Double‐Blind, Randomized Study,” Photochemistry and Photobiology 91, no. 1 (2015): 248–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Valacchi G., Pecorelli A., Belmonte G., et al., “Protective Effects of Topical Vitamin C Compound Mixtures Against Ozone‐Induced Damage in Human Skin,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 137, no. 6 (2017): 1373–1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Silva L. A., Ferraz Carbonel A. A., de Moraes A. R. B., et al., “Collagen Concentration on the Facial Skin of Postmenopausal Women After Topical Treatment With Estradiol and Genistein: A Randomized Double‐Blind Controlled Trial,” Gynecological Endocrinology 33, no. 11 (2017): 845–848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Moraes A. B., Haidar M. A., Soares Júnior J. M., Simões M. J., Baracat E. C., and Patriarca M. T., “The Effects of Topical Isoflavones on Postmenopausal Skin: Double‐Blind and Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy,” European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 146, no. 2 (2009): 188–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Neder L. and de Medeiros S. F., “Topical Estradiol Does Not Interfere With the Expression of the Metalloproteinase‐1 Enzyme in Photo Exposed Skin Cells,” Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia 87, no. 1 (2012): 70–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Cho S.‐Y., Kim A. Y., Kim J., Choi D.‐H., Son E. D., and Shin D. W., “Oxytocin Alleviates Cellular Senescence Through Oxytocin Receptor‐Mediated Extracellular Signal‐Regulated Kinase/Nrf2 Signalling,” British Journal of Dermatology 181, no. 6 (2019): 1216–1225, 10.1111/bjd.17824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Fabi S. G., Cattelan L., Caughlin B., Sanchez Pérez J., Cirrincione M., and Dayan S., “Unlocking the Psycho‐Social‐Dermal Axis: A Double‐Blinded Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Study Unveiling the Influence of a Novel Topical Formulation on Skin Quality, Attractiveness, Quality of Life, and Sexual Satisfaction,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 22, no. 8 (2023): 2218–2224, 10.1111/jocd.15870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Bocheva G., Slominski R. M., Janjetovic Z., et al., “Protective Role of Melatonin and Its Metabolites in Skin Aging,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 3 (2022): 1238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Reiter R. J., Tan D. X., Rosales‐Corral S., Galano A., Jou M. J., and Acuna‐Castroviejo D., “Melatonin Mitigates Mitochondrial Meltdown: Interactions With SIRT3,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 8 (2018): 2439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Tamtaji O. R., Mobini M., Reiter R. J., Azami A., Gholami M. S., and Asemi Z., “Melatonin, a Toll‐ Like Receptor Inhibitor: Current Status and Future Perspectives,” Journal of Cellular Physiology 234, no. 6 (2019): 7788–7795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Babadjouni A., Reddy M., Zhang R., Raffi J., Phong C., and Mesinkovska N., “Melatonin and the Human Hair Follicle,” Journal of Drugs in Dermatology 22, no. 3 (2023): 260–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Samra T., Gomez‐Gomez T., Linowiecka K., et al., “Melatonin Exerts Prominent, Differential Epidermal and Dermal Anti‐Aging Properties in Aged Human Eyelid Skin Ex Vivo,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 21 (2023): 15963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Ma L. P., Liu M. M., Liu F., et al., “Melatonin Inhibits Senescence‐Associated Melanin Pigmentation Through the p53‐TYR Pathway in Human Primary Melanocytes and the Skin of C57BL/6 J Mice After UVB Irradiation,” Journal of Molecular Medicine 101, no. 5 (2023): 581–593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Jeong S., Yoon S., Kim S., et al., “Anti‐Wrinkle Benefits of Peptides Complex Stimulating Skin Basement Membrane Proteins Expression,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 1 (2019): 73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Pascarella S., Tiberi C., Sabatino G., et al., “Serpin A1 C‐Terminal Peptides as Collagen Turnover Modulators,” ChemMedChem 11, no. 16 (2016): 1850–1855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Cipriani C., Pascarella S., Errante F., et al., “Serpin A1 and the Modulation of Type I Collagen Turnover: Effect of the C‐Terminal Peptide 409‐418 (SA1‐III) in Human Dermal Fibroblasts,” Cell Biology International 42, no. 10 (2018): 1340–1348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Wang X., Shi W., Wang K., et al., “Rationally Designed Nonapeptides With Great Skin Photoprotective Effect Through Producing Type 1 Collagen and Blocking the mTOR Pathway,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 66, no. 11 (2023): 7615–7628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Wang H., Wei S., Xue X., You Y., and Ma Q., “Adipose Stem Cells' Antagonism in Glycosylation of D‐Galactose‐Induced Skin Aging of Nude Mice and Its Skin Recovery Function,” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology 29, no. 3 (2016): 376–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Li L., Ngo H. T. T., Hwang E., et al., “Conditioned Medium From Human Adipose‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Culture Prevents UVB‐Induced Skin Aging in Human Keratinocytes and Dermal Fibroblasts,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 1 (2019): 49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Park B. S., Jang K. A., Sung J. H., et al., “Adipose‐Derived Stem Cells and Their Secretory Factors as a Promising Therapy for Skin Aging,” Dermatologic Surgery 34, no. 10 (2008): 1323–1326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. D'andrea M., Perrotta A., Ferrillo M., Cantelli M., Donnarumma M., and Fabbrocini G., “Evaluation of Tolerability and Skin Changes After Application of Topical Antiaging Products Based on Sibanid SG, Plant Stem Cells and Regenerative and Biostimulating Active Ingredients,” Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 154, no. 1 (2019): 6–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Huynh C. B., Vu N. B., Van T. T., and Pham P. V., “Effects of Exosomes From Hypoxia‐Induced Adipose‐Derived Stem Cells on Ameliorating Photoaging,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 24 (2023): 18899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Guidoni M., de Sousa Júnior A. D., Aragão V. P. M., et al., “Plant Stem Cell Extract From Coffea canephora Shows Antioxidant, Anti‐Inflammatory, and Skin Regenerative Properties Mediated by Suppression of Nuclear Factor‐κB,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 56 (2023): e12849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Nahm W. J., Nikas C., Goldust M., et al., “Exosomes in Dermatology: A Comprehensive Review of Current Applications, Clinical Evidence, and Future Directions,” International Journal of Dermatology, (2025), 10.1111/ijd.17903. Online ahead of Print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Wyles S. P., Yu G. T., Gold M., and Behfar A., “Topical Platelet Exosomes Reduce Senescence Signaling in Human Skin: An Exploratory Prospective Trial,” Dermatologic Surgery 50, no. 11S (2024): S160–S165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Gao W., Wang X., Si Y., et al., “Exosome Derived From ADSCs Attenuates Ultraviolet B‐ Mediated Photoaging in Human Dermal Fibroblasts,” Photochemistry and Photobiology 97, no. 4 (2021): 795–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Kang H. T., Lee H. I., and Hwang E. S., “Nicotinamide Extends Replicative Lifespan of Human Cells,” Aging Cell 5, no. 5 (2006): 423–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Wessels Q., Pretorius E., Smith C. M., and Nel H., “The Potential of a Niacinamide Dominated Cosmeceutical Formulation on Fibroblast Activity and Wound Healing In Vitro,” International Wound Journal 11, no. 2 (2014): 152–158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Bhasin S., Seals D., Migaud M., Musi N., and Baur J. A., “Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide in Aging Biology: Potential Applications and Many Unknowns,” Endocrine Reviews 44, no. 6 (2023): 1047–1073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Jacobson E. L., Kim H., Kim M., et al., “A Topical Lipophilic Niacin Derivative Increases NAD, Epidermal Differentiation and Barrier Function in Photodamaged Skin,” Experimental Dermatology 16, no. 6 (2007): 490–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Di Lorenzo R., Falanga D., Ricci L., et al., “NAD‐Driven Sirtuin Activation by Cordyceps Sinensis Extract: Exploring the Adaptogenic Potential to Promote Skin Longevity,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 8 (2024): 4282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Pillai V. B., Samant S., Sundaresan N. R., et al., “Honokiol Blocks and Reverses Cardiac Hypertrophy in Mice by Activating Mitochondrial Sirt3,” Nature Communications 6, no. 1 (2015): 6656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Li J., Zeng X., Yang X., and Ding H., “Lycopene Ameliorates Skin Aging by Regulating the Insulin Resistance Pathway and Activating SIRT1,” Food & Function 13, no. 21 (2022): 11307–11320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Liu T., Zhu S., Yang Y., et al., “Oroxylin A Ameliorates Ultraviolet Radiation‐Induced Premature Skin Aging by Regulating Oxidative Stress via the Sirt1 Pathway,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 171 (2024): 116110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Darmawan C. C., Hur K., Kusumaningrum N., Chung J. H., Lee S. H., and Mun J. H., “Dasatinib Attenuates Fibrosis in Keloids by Decreasing Senescent Cell Burden,” Acta Dermato‐Venereologica 103 (2023): adv4475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Chung C. L., Lawrence I., Hoffman M., et al., “Topical Rapamycin Reduces Markers of Senescence and Aging in Human Skin: An Exploratory, Prospective, Randomized Trial,” GeroScience 41, no. 6 (2019): 861–869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Thapa R. K., Nguyen H. T., Jeong J. H., et al., “Progressive Slowdown/Prevention of Cellular Senescence by CD9‐Targeted Delivery of Rapamycin Using Lactose‐Wrapped Calcium Carbonate Nanoparticles,” Scientific Reports 7 (2017): 43299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Chai M., Jiang M., Vergnes L., et al., “Stimulation of Hair Growth by Small Molecules That Activate Autophagy,” Cell Reports 27, no. 12 (2019): 3413–3421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Chen Q., Zhang H., Yang Y., et al., “Metformin Attenuates UVA‐Induced Skin Photoaging by Suppressing Mitophagy and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 13 (2022): 6960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Soydas T., Sayitoglu M., Sarac E. Y., et al., “Metformin Reverses the Effects of High Glucose on Human Dermal Fibroblasts of Aged Skin via Downregulating RELA/p65 Expression,” Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry 77, no. 3 (2021): 443–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Friedmann D. P., Fabi S. G., and Goldman M. P., “Combination of Intense Pulsed Light, Sculptra, and Ultherapy for Treatment of the Aging Face,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 13, no. 2 (2014): 109–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Jiang X., Ge H., Zhou C., Chai X., and Deng H., “The Role of Transforming Growth Factor β1 in Fractional Laser Resurfacing With a Carbon Dioxide Laser,” Lasers in Medical Science 29, no. 2 (2014): 681–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Helbig D., Bodendorf M. O., Grunewald S., Kendler M., Simon J. C., and Paasch U., “Immunohistochemical Investigation of Wound Healing in Response to Fractional Photothermolysis,” Journal of Biomedical Optics 14, no. 6 (2009): e064044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. De Filippis A., Perfetto B., Guerrera L. P., Oliviero G., and Baroni A., “Q‐Switched 1064 Nm Nd‐Yag Nanosecond Laser Effects on Skin Barrier Function and on Molecular Rejuvenation Markers in Keratinocyte‐Fibroblasts Interaction,” Lasers in Medical Science 34, no. 3 (2019): 595–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Barolet D., Christiaens F., and Hamblin M. R., “Infrared and Skin: Friend or Foe,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology. B 155 (2016): 78–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Mota L. R., Duarte I. d. S., Galache T. R., et al., “Photobiomodulation Reduces Periocular Wrinkle Volume by 30%: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery 41, no. 2 (2023): 48–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Lee J. H., Roh M. R., and Lee K. H., “Effects of Infrared Radiation on Skin Photo‐Aging and Pigmentation,” Yonsei Medical Journal 47, no. 4 (2006): 485–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Heidari Beigvand H., Razzaghi M., Rostami‐Nejad M., et al., “Assessment of Laser Effects on Skin Rejuvenation,” Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences 11, no. 2 (2020): 212–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in PubMed at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.


Articles from Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES