Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 2;19:3133–3144. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S532123

Table 1.

Material (n = 60 Eyes)*

ERM-F % LMH
n n
Operations (eyes) 30/60 50% 30/60 50%
Gender (patients) Whole group (n=58) 28 30
Women 21/28 75% 12/30 40%
Men 7/28 25% 18/30 60%
Age range, whole group 52 – 84 years 51 – 84 years
Young 16/30 53% 14/30 47%
Old 14/30 47% 16/30 53%
Eyes operated Left 16/30 53% 8/30 27%
Right 14/30 47% 22/30 73%
Median FU time (mo) Whole group 27 26
Young 21 38
Old 30 16
Preoperative VA <0.5 decimal (worst) 12
>0.5 decimal (best) 11
<0.4 decimal 11
>0.4 decimal 9
EP 0 21
8/14 57%
6/14 43%
13/16 81%
3/16 19%
EZ defects 2 15
Young, EZ defect 1/16 6% 6/14 43%
Young, no EZ defect 15/16 94% 8/14 57%
Old, EZ defect 1/14 7% 9/16 56%
Old, no EZ defect 13/14 93% 7/16 44%
ELM defects 2 10
Young, ELM defect 1/16 6% 3/14 21%
Young, no ELM defect 15/16 94% 11/14 79%
Old, ELM defect 1/14 7% 7/16 44%
Old, no ELM defect 13/14 93% 9/16 56%

Note: *Unless otherwise indicated, data are given in number of eyes.

Abbreviations: ERM-F: epiretinal membrane foveoschisis; LMH: lamellar macular hole; ELM: external limiting membrane; EP: epiretinal proliferation; EZ: ellipsoid zone; FU: follow-up; old: >70 years; young: ≤70 years; VA: visual acuity. *Unless otherwise indicated, data are given in number of eyes.