Table 6. Critiques identified in the analysis of the 35 review papers eligible for review- or study-level analyses.

Category	Critique identified about the CLAIM with representative source articles
Fulfillment	Certain items may be viewed as overly strict or difficult to meet43
	Certain items are too technical, requiring advanced engineering or statistical knowledge14
Applicability	Some items are not applicable to all study types12, 13, 14,30,39
Feasibility and practicality	Some items may be impractical or infeasible in real-world settings22
Structure	Dividing the checklist into distinct sections sometimes complicates quality assessment39
Interpretation	Deciding if an item is sufficiently reported is subjective13,39,44
	Certain items may be viewed as vague or lack clarity in their current form22
	Certain items provide limited guidance on holistically interpreting a manuscript alongside its code45
Relative importance	Certain items may be more crucial than others but are currently weighted equally13,39
Scoring	Lack of standardized score or compliance calculation strategy44

CLAIM, Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging.