Skip to main content
. 2025 May 1;18(2):19–39. doi: 10.11621/pir.2025.0202

Table 3.

Testing for factorial invariance of the Consumer Socio-Cultural Premises Scale across women (n= 143) and men (n= 166) groups

Model χ2 df CFI RMSEA (90% CI) SRMR Model Comparison Δχ2 Δdf ΔCFIΔ RMSEA ΔSRMR
(M0) 1246.99 1216 .996 (.000 .013 – .025) .083
(M1) 1319.31 1246 .991 (.000 020 – .029) .086 M0 – M1 72.32 30 .005 .007 .003
(M2) 1340.05 1276 .992 (.000 .018 – .028) .084 M1 – M2 20.74 30 .001 .002 .002
(M3) 1357.40 1313 .994 (.000 015 – .026) .086 M2 – M3 17.35 37 .002 .003 .002

a M0 = configural, bM1 = metric, cM2 = scalar, dM3 = residual.