ABSTRACT
Serotonin (5‐hydroxytryptamine; 5‐HT) is an evolutionarily conserved monoamine neurotransmitter that plays critical roles in various physiological systems, functioning as a neurotransmitter, hormone, and paracrine signaling molecule. This review synthesizes current research on 5‐HT metabolism (biosynthesis, transport, and degradation), 5‐HT receptor‐mediated signaling pathways (seven receptor families and 14 subtypes), and broad biological functions of 5‐HT. We emphasize the roles of 5‐HT in both health and disease, with a particular focus on its emerging significance in the tumor immune microenvironment. Studies have shown that dysregulated 5‐HT signaling is associated with various pathological conditions, including functional gastrointestinal disorders, psychiatric diseases, metabolic disorders, and cancer progression. Notably, this review describes novel mechanisms by which 5‐HT modulates tumor immunity, including its effects on macrophage polarization, dendritic cell function, T cell activity, and PD‐L1 expression, and it explores the therapeutic potential of targeting 5‐HT‐associated pathways. Promising therapeutic strategies that target 5‐HT include combining selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors, inhibiting key metabolic enzymes (e.g., Tph1 and MAO‐A), and developing receptor subtype‐specific agents (e.g., 5‐HT7R antagonists). These findings position the 5‐HT system as a pivotal target for next‐generation precision therapeutics across multiple disease domains.
Keywords: 5‐hydroxytryptamine (5‐HT), 5‐HT receptor (5‐HTR), serotonin, signaling pathways, therapeutic potential, tumor immune microenvironment
This article reviews the roles of 5‐HT metabolism, 5‐HT receptors, and their related signaling pathways in normal physiology and various diseases, and explores their potential value in disease treatment, providing a reference basis for research and clinical treatment in related fields.

1. Introduction
Serotonin (5‐hydroxytryptamine; 5‐HT) research spans the fields of neurobiology, pharmacology, immunology, and systems physiology. 5‐HT functions as a key neurotransmitter, hormonal regulator, and paracrine signaling molecule, and it is widely involved in the regulation of multiple physiological systems [1, 2]. Moreover, 5‐HT is currently recognized as a central modulator of central nervous system (CNS) functions, such as mood, cognition, and pain perception, and peripheral processes, including gastrointestinal (GI) motility, cardiovascular homeostasis, platelet aggregation, and immune responses [3, 4]. In addition to its fundamental biological roles, 5‐HT has attracted enormous attention because of its clinical relevance in central and peripheral disorders, including depression, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), neurodegenerative diseases, metabolism, and other syndromes [5, 6, 7, 8]. Additionally, recent studies have highlighted the increasingly prominent role of 5‐HT in tumor immunomodulation [9]. The important role of 5‐HT in many diseases emphasizes its emerging potential for use as a therapeutic target and places this field at the forefront of translational research.
There is broad consensus in the scientific community that 5‐HT functions through a complex network of metabolic pathways and receptor subtypes; at least 14 subtypes of 5‐HT receptors (5‐HTRs) have been identified to date, and each subtype mediates distinct physiological effects [10, 11]. Although the pathways that are involved in 5‐HT metabolism and 5‐HTR signaling are well characterized, their functional roles and mechanisms in the context of disease remain controversial [12, 13]. For example, the 5‐HT transporter (SERT) has been particularly well studied, and it is the cornerstone of current antidepressant pharmacotherapy [14]. However, the precise mechanisms underlying the role of 5‐HT in mood disorders, as well as the contribution of peripheral 5‐HT to systemic diseases such as metabolic syndrome or cardiovascular dysfunction, are still under debate [15]. Emerging evidence that 5‐HT plays dual roles in tumorigenesis has further complicated the traditional CNS‐centric understanding of 5‐HT, highlighting the need for integrative and systems research [16].
In light of these developments, this review aims to provide a comprehensive and up‐to‐date summary of the current knowledge about 5‐HT, including its metabolism, receptor‐mediated signaling, physiological functions, and pathophysiological roles [17, 18, 19]. Here, we systematically organize the advances in understanding how 5‐HT signaling modulates disease progression and how these pathways may be leveraged in the development of multitarget therapeutic strategies [20, 21, 22, 23, 24]. By incorporating insights from the fields of biology, immunoregulation, and molecular signaling, this review highlights the integrative role of the 5‐HT system in the pathophysiology of multiple organ systems, offering a comprehensive perspective for future mechanistic research.
This review is organized as follows. First, we provide an overview of 5‐HT metabolism and summarize its physiological roles. Next, we describe 5‐HTR‐mediated signaling cascades and receptor–receptor interactions. Then, we assess currently available therapeutic strategies and their limitations. Subsequent sections explore recent advances in 5‐HT‐related research in the fields of cancer, functional GI disorders, neuropsychiatric diseases, and metabolic syndromes, with a focus on its immunomodulatory functions. We further evaluate the potential of 5‐HT to be used as a biomarker of disease. Finally, we discuss emerging directions for targeting the 5‐HT system, including strategies for multitarget modulation.
2. 5‐HT Metabolism and Physiological Functions
5‐HT is widely distributed in both the CNS and peripheral tissues, where it performs diverse regulatory functions in the nervous, endocrine, and immune systems [1]. In recent years, advances in molecular biology, neuroscience, and immunology have further elucidated the mechanisms underlying 5‐HT synthesis and metabolism as well as its roles in the physiological regulation of multiple systems.
2.1. Biosynthesis, Transport, and Degradation
5‐HT is a substance that exerts a strong vasoconstrictor effect, and it was first isolated from the intestine [1]. Tryptophan is converted into 5‐hydroxytryptophan (5‐HTP) by tryptophan hydroxylase (Tph), and then, 5‐HT is further generated via the action of 5‐HTP decarboxylase [10]. In this biosynthetic process, Tph functions as the rate‐limiting enzyme in 5‐HT synthesis. There are two isoforms of Tph in the body: Tph1 and Tph2 [25]. Tph1 is located mainly in the chromaffin cells of the intestine, where it produces approximately 95% of the total 5‐HT molecules throughout the body, whereas Tph2 is expressed primarily in the brain within the CNS, where it synthesizes approximately 5% of the total 5‐HT molecules throughout the body [26]. Since 5‐HT cannot cross the blood‒brain barrier, the 5‐HT that is synthesized by Tphs is confined to either the peripheral or CNS [27] (Figure 1). Notably, in addition to the classical synthesis pathway, the cytochrome P450 enzyme system (especially CYP2D6) may participate in the synthesis of 5‐HT via the O‐demethylation of 5‐methoxytryptamine [28]
FIGURE 1.

Pathways of serotonin (5‐HT) metabolism. Within the cytoplasm of cells, tryptophan hydroxylase (Tph) catalyzes the conversion of l‐tryptophan (Trp) to 5‐hydroxytryptophan (5‐HTP), which is then converted to 5‐HT via aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC). After crossing the cell membrane via exocytosis, 5‐HT binds to a 5‐HT receptor (5‐HTR). Extracellular 5‐HT is transported into the cytoplasm via the 5‐HT transporter (SERT). 5‐HT can be catabolized into 5‐hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5‐HAA), NH3, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) by mitochondrial monoamine oxidase A (MAO‐A). Abbreviations: SLC1A5: solute carrier family 1 member 5; SCC7A5: solute carrier family 1 member 7.
In the circulatory system, the 5‐HT that is synthesized by the body is stored in platelets through SERT, where it performs important physiological functions [26, 29]. 5‐HT plays a physiological role by binding to specific receptors and then quickly dissociating from these receptors [11]. The dissociated 5‐HT is then reabsorbed into platelets or other related cells by SERT, resulting in a loss of its physiological activity, thereby terminating its effects in the body [30, 31].
In tissues, platelets, and other related cells, the metabolism of 5‐HT mainly depends on monoamine oxidase A (MAO‐A) in mitochondria, and the function of MAO‐A requires flavin adenine dinucleotide as a cofactor [32, 33]. 5‐HT is metabolized mainly into 5‐hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5‐HIAA) [34]. This metabolic pathway involves the initial oxidation of 5‐HT by MAO‐A to generate the corresponding aldehyde. This aldehyde is then further oxidized by aldehyde dehydrogenase to form 5‐HIAA, which is an indoleacetic acid derivative [34]. 5‐HIAA is subsequently excreted by the kidneys [34]. In addition, there is a minor metabolic pathway by which 5‐HIAL is converted to 5‐hydroxytryptol by acetaldehyde reductase, but this pathway is generally considered nondominant [35]. During the degradation of 5‐HT by MAO‐A, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are also generated, and these ROS may induce oxidative stress in cells, further regulating cellular functions or contributing to pathological responses [16, 36].
2.2. Physiological Functions
5‐HT, which is an important neurotransmitter, is widely distributed in various tissues, such as the CNS, GI tract, and platelets [37]. 5‐HT plays key roles in many physiological processes, especially in the CNS and peripheral systems [38]. 5‐HT is involved in mood regulation, cognitive function, sleep, appetite control, and so on, and it plays a crucial role in regulating peripheral systems, such as the cardiovascular and GI systems [38, 39].
The role of 5‐HT in the nervous system is particularly important, since it is involved in the regulation of various functions, such as mood, memory, learning, and pain transmission [40]. Research has shown that changes in 5‐HT levels are closely associated with several mental disorders [40]. 5‐HT deficiency or 5‐HTR dysfunction may lead to symptoms, such as depression and anxiety. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) function by increasing the concentration of 5‐HT in the brain, thereby helping to treat depression and anxiety [41, 42]. In addition, 5‐HT plays dual roles in the perception, regulation and conduction of pain depending on the site of its action and its interaction with different receptors [43]. Peripherally, 5‐HT enhances pain perception by binding to the 5‐HTRs on peripheral nerves [44]. Especially during an inflammatory response, 5‐HT may exacerbate pain by promoting local vasodilation and increasing the excitability of local nerve conduction. In the CNS, the role of 5‐HT is more complex, since in this system, it can both alleviate and intensify pain [45]. 5‐Hydroxytryptaminergic (5‐HTergic) neurons communicate with the spinal thalamic tract through multisynaptic or monosynaptic connections, thereby modulating the transmission of pain signals [46]. Furthermore, the 5‐HT system interacts with other neurotransmitters, such as those in the norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) systems, to jointly regulate the transmission and modulation of pain [47, 48, 49].
Moreover, 5‐HT not only is involved in the regulation of emotions but also plays important roles in cognitive function, learning and memory [39]. 5‐HTergic neurons primarily project from the raphe nucleus to areas of the brain, such as the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (PFC), as well as extending descending projections to regions such as the periaqueductal gray, striatum, and amygdala [50]. The function of 5‐HT in areas of the brain such as the hippocampus is considered to be closely related to synaptic plasticity and efficiency of information transmission during learning [49]. 5‐HT regulates hippocampal synaptic connectivity by altering the excitability of intracellular homeostasis and synaptic connections [51], and reduced release of 5‐HT leads to declarative memory dysfunction [52].
Furthermore, 5‐HT plays a crucial role in the peripheral nervous system, particularly in the regulation of GI function, the cardiovascular system, and platelet activity [53]. In the GI tract, 5‐HT regulates gut motility, secretion, and immune responses [54, 55, 56, 57]. An imbalance in the 5‐HT levels in the GI tract may be associated with a variety of GI disorders, such as IBS, constipation, or diarrhea [58, 59, 60]. Moreover, 5‐HT may have complex interactions with the gut microbiota. Indeed, 5‐HT affects the growth and metabolism of gut microbes, thereby indirectly influencing overall gut function and immune responses [61, 62]. Additionally, 5‐HT plays a significant role in the vascular system [63]. 5‐HT regulates vascular smooth muscle to induce vasoconstriction, thereby affecting the regulation of blood pressure [64]. Under normal physiological conditions, 5‐HT helps maintain the balance between blood vessel constriction and dilation, thus participating in the regulation of local blood flow [16]. However, under pathological conditions, the abnormal release or metabolism of 5‐HT may contribute to the development of diseases such as hypertension and arteriosclerosis [16, 65]. Additionally, 5‐HT plays a crucial role in platelets. During the coagulation process, platelets release 5‐HT, which aids in platelet aggregation and thrombus formation, thus contributing to hemostasis [66]. Changes in the concentration of 5‐HT in the blood are closely related to thrombus formation and dissolution, highlighting its significant role in the development of cardiovascular diseases [67, 68].
In addition to its traditional physiological functions, 5‐HT has recently been shown to play important roles in metabolic regulation and immune modulation [69]. Similar to the expression of the classic fasting hormone glucagon, the upregulation of Tph1 expression in the gut leads to a significant increase in 5‐HT levels during fasting [70]. This change effectively promotes the breakdown of fats in adipocytes, providing the necessary substrates for hepatic gluconeogenesis [70]. Furthermore, 5‐HT plays dual roles in inflammatory responses [71]. Research has shown that 5‐HT can modulate the intensity of inflammation by promoting or inhibiting the release of certain cytokines. This function makes 5‐HT a key focus in the study of autoimmune diseases and allergic reactions.
Overall, 5‐HT, which is an important neurotransmitter, not only regulates psychological and physiological functions such as mood, cognition, and sleep in the CNS but also participates in various physiological processes of the peripheral nervous system by regulating the GI tract, blood vessels, and platelet functions. As the understanding of the physiological functions of 5‐HT increases, more drugs that target the 5‐HT system are likely to emerge in the future, potentially leading to significant advances in the treatment of both neurological and peripheral system disorders.
3. Signaling Mechanisms
5‐HT plays a wide range of physiological roles in both the central and peripheral nervous systems [38]. 5‐HT must exert its effects through its corresponding receptors. Owing to the diversity of 5‐HTRs, the signaling mechanisms that are mediated by 5‐HT are complex, and different receptors activate distinct signaling pathways. The following is an overview of the signaling mechanisms that are mediated by 5‐HT.
3.1. 5‐HTRs
The classification of 5‐HTRs is complex. To date, 14 subtypes of 5‐HTRs have been identified in mammals, and these receptors are grouped into seven families: 5‐HT1R to 5‐HT7R [11, 72]. By activating different 5‐HTR subtypes, 5‐HT exerts diverse pharmacological effects (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2.

Pathways associated with serotonin (5‐HT) receptors. 5‐HT signals through seven receptors on membrane surfaces. These receptors activate several major interconnected signaling networks, such as those involving PKB/cAMP, PI3K/Akt, Ras/MEK1/2/MAPK, and PLC/PKCE, that trigger cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.
In the CNS, research on 5‐HT has focused primarily on 5‐HT1Rs, 5‐HT2Rs, 5‐HT3Rs, and 5‐HT6Rs [15, 73]. 5‐HT1BR is predominantly distributed in the striatum and, to a lesser extent, in the basal ganglia, hypothalamus, substantia nigra, pituitary gland, and neocortex [74]. As a presynaptic autoreceptor, 5‐HT1BR plays a key role in regulating the synthesis and release of 5‐HT. 5‐HT1DR is abundantly expressed in the coronary arteries, cerebral arteries, and ganglia, where it mainly mediates vasodilation [74]. 5‐HT1ER, which has a high affinity exclusively for 5‐HT, is diffusely distributed in the cerebral cortex and may be involved in various mental activities [75]. 5‐HT1FR exhibits strong binding affinity for tritiated 5‐HT, and it is located primarily in layer V pyramidal neurons of the PFC; in the periphery, it is distributed mainly in the uterus and mesentery [76]. 5‐HT2AR is widely expressed in the CA1, CA2, and CA3 regions of the hippocampus, and it is regulated by exogenous 5‐HT neurotransmission [77]. 5‐HT2BR is expressed in multiple regions of the spinal cord and brain [77]. 5‐HT6R, which is coupled to excitatory guanine nucleotide‐binding proteins (G proteins), activates adenylate cyclase (AC) to initiate intracellular signaling cascades [78, 79].
The role of 5‐HT in peripheral tissues has also received considerable attention. Studies have shown that 5‐HT can promote liver regeneration, 5‐HT2AR plays a key role in signal transduction during this process [80]. 5‐HT2BR is highly expressed in a wide range of peripheral tissues, including the heart, skeletal muscle, ovary, liver, kidney, lungs, pancreas, trachea, spleen, prostate, and salivary glands [81, 82]. 5‐HT3R is expressed at high levels in enteric neurons, particularly in intestinal afferent neurons containing substance P [83]. In the human colon, 5‐HT3Rs are most densely distributed in the myenteric plexus and less densely distributed in the muscular and mucosal layers [83]. In the GI tract of rats, 5‐HT3Rs are located primarily in the neurons of the myenteric and submucosal plexuses, especially near the serosal membrane of neurons and circular and longitudinal muscle fibers; additionally, in the nerve fibers of the mucosa and submucosa, only low levels of 5‐HT3RS expression are found in the interstitial cells of Cajal and enterochromaffin (EC) cells [84]. 5‐HT4R is expressed in various GI cell types, including EC cells, smooth muscle cells, secretory cells, and neurons [85]. However, studies on the genetic and functional roles of 5‐HT5R in the nervous and digestive systems remain limited. Finally, 5‐HT7R is present in enteric neurons and smooth muscle cells [76, 86].
Notably, studies have revealed differential 5‐HT2BR expression among patients with subtypes of IBS, suggesting that distinct IBS subtypes may have different underlying pathophysiological mechanisms [87]. Furthermore, 5‐HT and its receptors have been identified in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. In these cells, 5‐HT and its receptors are predominantly localized in the cytoplasm, with strong positive expression near the cell membrane, indicating a possible autocrine mechanism of 5‐HT function in HCC [88, 89]. In particular, HCC cells expressing 5‐HT and its receptors demonstrate high proliferative potential [88, 89].
In summary, the distribution of 5‐HTRs varies significantly across different tissues and spatial dimensions. A thorough analysis of their spatial distribution patterns in various tissues and cell types will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the physiological functions of 5‐HTR and the signaling mechanisms they mediate.
3.2. 5‐HTR‐Associated Signal Transduction Pathways
Although 5‐HTRs are differentially distributed across various tissues and organs, the signaling pathways they mediate exhibit a certain degree of consistency. With the exception of 5‐HT3Rs, all 5‐HTRs are coupled to G proteins, and thus, they activate second messenger systems and regulate cellular functions through the phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of intracellular proteins [90, 91]. These receptors primarily regulate two classical intracellular second messenger pathways. Moreover, an increasing number of studies have suggested that these receptor subtypes can also activate various other intracellular signaling cascades, indicating that they play more complex roles in the modulation of cellular functions.
3.2.1. 5‐HT2R
The 5‐HT2R family consists of three members: 5‐HT2AR, 5‐HT2BR, and 5‐HT2CR [92]. These receptors are consistently coupled to the phospholipase C (PLC)‐β second messenger pathway in both native tissues and heterologous cells [93]. However, 5‐HT2R can also be coupled to other second messenger pathways in a cell‐specific manner [92]. Although 5‐HT2Rs are similar in terms of structure, pharmacology, and signaling pathways, there are some differences in their signaling properties [93].
5‐HT2R activates PLC‐β in various tissues and cells, leading to the accumulation of inositol phosphates and an increase in intracellular Ca2+, which subsequently activates l‐type Ca2+ channels and stimulates protein kinases C (PKC) [94]. Additionally, 5‐HT2A/2CR can also activate other phospholipases, such as PLA2 and PLD [95, 96]. Moreover, in CHO and 1C11 cells, 5‐HT2A/2CR promotes the release of arachidonic acid (AA) via the activation of PLA2 [97], whereas in rat glomerular mesangial cells, 5‐HT2A/2CR is coupled to PLD [98], although there is little evidence suggesting that 5‐HT2BR can perform the same function. For 5‐HT2CR, compared with 5‐HT, some agonists preferentially activate PLA2 or PLC in terms of relative efficacy. 5‐HT2A/2CR generally does not regulate cAMP formation in most cells or tissues, but it can either stimulate or reduce cAMP accumulation in specific cell types [99]. In A1 cells, cAMP production is amplified via PKC‐α/δ and Ca2+/calmodulin (CaM) [100]. In rat mesangial cells, 5‐HT2A/2CR can inhibit intracellular cAMP accumulation and adenylate cyclase (AC) activity in washed membranes, and this effect occurs independently of PLC, Ca2+, and PKC [101]. 5‐HT2R activates extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK) in contractile cells, such as vascular smooth muscle cells and mesangial cells [102, 103]. In vascular smooth muscle cells, ERK activation involves a complex mechanism that requires input from PLC, L‐type Ca2+ channels, and mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MEK) 1 [104]. In mesangial cells, this pathway also involves PKC stimulation, NADPH oxidase‐like enzyme activation, and ROS (H2O2 and/or superoxide) production [105, 106, 107]. In mesangial cells, ERK activation via 5‐HT2A/2CR depends on the production of ROS by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase, which serves as a critical upstream step. Furthermore, 5‐HT2A/2CR is coupled to the Jak/STAT signaling pathway, promoting the phosphorylation of janus kinase (Jak) 2 and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) 3, inducing the nuclear translocation of STAT3, and regulating the expression of genes that are related to myogenic differentiation [108, 109]. 5‐HT2R can increase intracellular Ca2+ levels either by releasing Ca2+ from internal stores or by activating both voltage‐dependent and voltage‐independent Ca2+ channels [110]. This effect is associated with Ca2+‐activated K+ channels and Ca2+‐activated Cl− channels in the cell [111]. 5‐HT2A/2CR can both promote NO release and inhibit cytokine‐induced inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression [112]. Additionally, 5‐HT2A/2CR can regulate various transport processes, such as the activation of the Na+/H+ exchanger in mesangial cells and the Na+/K+‐ATPase in airway smooth muscle cells. In mouse LMTK− fibroblasts stably expressing 5‐HT2BR, rapid activation of the Ras and ERK1/2 MAPK pathways, which involves both the Gαq and Gβγ subunits, has been observed [113, 114]. This signaling axis not only promotes cell proliferation but also leads to tumor formation in nude mice, indicating that tumorigenic potential of 5‐HT2BR is primarily mediated by the Ras‐ERK pathway [114]. 5‐HT2BR can also drive cell cycle progression via an ERK‐dependent mechanism, upregulating and activating the cyclin D1/cyclin dependent kinase (cdk) 4 and cyclin E/cdk2 complexes, resulting in hyperphosphorylation of the Rb protein [115]. The activation of cyclin D1 depends on the involvement of platelet‐derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor kinase. Moreover, activation of the PDGF receptor, ERK, and cyclin D1/E as well as cell proliferation rely on the function of the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase Src [116].
3.2.2. 5‐HT3R
To date, five different 5‐HT3R subunits have been identified, and among these subunits, the 5‐HT3AR and 5‐HT3BR subunits are the mature components of the 5‐HTR [117]. Notably, only 5‐HT3AR subunits can form functional isoforms, and at least one 5‐HT3AR subunit is present in all isomeric receptors. Many researchers refer collectively to various subtypes of 5‐HT3R, and studies have also indicated that the selective blockade of 5‐HT3AR has the same effect as the complete blockade of 5‐HT3R activity [118, 119]. 5‐HT3R antagonists reportedly increase cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels and ERK1/2 phosphorylation and inhibit microtubule formation [120, 121, 122]. 5‐HT3AR promotes the proliferation of lung adenocarcinoma cells by increasing the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 [123].
3.2.3. 5‐HT1R
The 5‐HT1R family consists of five members: 5‐HT1AR, 5‐HT1BR, 5‐HT1DR, 5‐HT1ER, and 5‐HT1FR [124]. 5‐HT1R primarily interact with Gi/o proteins, thereby inhibiting AC activity and regulating various other signaling pathways and effector molecules [125].
5‐HT1AR can inhibit AC in the human dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), but it is ineffective in rats [126]. Under specific conditions, 5‐HT1AR and 5‐HT1BR can cooperate with the βγ subunit to activate AC in order to promote cAMP expression, whereas 5‐HT1DR can stimulate mild levels of cAMP accumulation [126, 127]. This effect is specific to particular cell types: 5‐HT1A is effective in HeLa cells [128], whereas 5‐HT1BR and 5‐HT1DR can increase Ca2+ levels in specific cell types, thus contributing to K+ channel regulation [129]. 5‐HT1AR may also activate AA metabolism via PC‐PLC and PLA2, indirectly regulating nuclear factor kappa‐B (NF‐κB) and ERK signaling [127]. 5‐HT1R can activate the ERK signaling pathway, which depends on Gβγ subunits, PC‐PLC, phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI3K), endocytosis, and ROS [129, 130]. 5‐HT1BR activates ERK, protein kinase (Akt), and p70 S6 kinase more efficiently than 5‐HT1AR [131]. In 5‐HT1DR‐expressing systems, DNA synthesis can also be stimulated, and the proliferative effect is associated with the ERK‐ and PI3K‐related pathways [132]. In CHO cells, 5‐HT1AR can induce the production of H2O2 and superoxide anions, which are critical for ERK activation [133]. Additionally, 5‐HT1AR and 5‐HT1BR can regulate NO production [134]. The effect of 5‐HT1AR on NO varies across systems; it may either promote or inhibit NO generation [134], whereas 5‐HT1BR promotes endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity in vascular endothelial cells via a Ca2+‐dependent mechanism [135, 136]. Moreover, 5‐HT1Rs modulate various ion channels. 5‐HT1AR is a classic regulator of G‐protein inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels, and it promotes their opening via Gβγ subunits [137]. 5‐HT1AR can also inhibit N‐type and P/Q‐type Ca2+ channels in a Goα protein‐dependent manner [138]. 5‐HT1BR and 5‐HT1DR can activate Ca2+‐dependent K+ channels, which participate in postsynaptic modulation and negative feedback mechanisms [139, 140]. 5‐HT1AR can regulate various transport mechanisms, including Na+/K+‐ATPase, Na+/H+ exchange, and Na+‐dependent phosphate uptake, via the Ca2+ and PKC pathways, suggesting that 5‐HT1AR plays important roles in cell volume regulation and energy metabolism [141]. 5‐HT1AR promotes the proliferation of T cells, small‐cell lung cancer cells, and carcinoid cells in an ERK signaling‐dependent manner [127]. 5‐HT1BR enhances the proliferation of aortic endothelial cells and neuroblastoma cells, whereas 5‐HT1DR stimulates DNA synthesis in lung cancer cells [142]. Presynaptic 5‐HT1AR and 5‐HT1BR receptors have been shown to negatively regulate 5‐HT release [127]. Moreover, 5‐HT1FR participates in regulating 5‐HT release and may play a physiological role in antimigraine effects [143]. The pharmacological function of 5‐HT1ER remains unclear because of the lack of selective ligands.
3.2.4. 5‐HT4R
5‐HT4R primarily exerts its effects through the activation of AC [144]. The major functional roles of this receptor include prokinetic effects in the GI tract, as well as positive inotropic, chronotropic, and lusitropic effects in the atria but not in the ventricles [145].
5‐HT4R typically activates AC in both endogenous tissues and heterologously expressed cells. In the presence of 5‐HT, 5‐HT4R has similar abilities to stimulate AC activity [144]. Since the primary function of 5‐HT4R is to increase cAMP levels, most of the downstream effects of 5‐HT4R are mediated by PKA activation [146, 147]. Additionally, 5‐HT4Rs can modulate various ion channels. For example, they regulate Ca2+ channels by increasing the intracellular cAMP level and activating PKA [148]. In addition, 5‐HT4R enhances the If pacemaker current in atrial myocytes, stimulates Cl− currents in the human jejunal mucosa and rat distal colon, and activates Na+ currents in type II dorsal root ganglion cells via a diffusible second messenger pathway that is independent of cAMP, indicating that the receptor can also modulate channel function through the noncAMP/PKA pathway [149, 150]. However, 5‐HT4R does not universally activate ion channels. For example, 5‐HT4R inhibits Ca2+‐activated K+ currents, and this effect is also mediated through increased cAMP and PKA activation [151]. Furthermore, the receptor inhibits delayed rectifier K+ currents and suppresses voltage‐activated K+ channels in colliculi neurons via the cAMP/PKA pathway [152]. In addition, 5‐HT4Rs facilitate striatal dopamine (DA) release, acetylcholine (ACh) release from the frontal cortex, and 5‐HT release in the hippocampus [153, 154].
Although the four 5‐HT4R variants have similar abilities to stimulate AC, some functional differences between the isoforms have been observed. For example, compared with longer variants such as 5‐HT4AR and 5‐HT4BR, the 5‐HT4ER and 5‐HT4FR isoforms can significantly increase AC activity even in the absence of agonists [155, 156]. One proposed explanation is that the C‐terminal region may be involved in rapid or constitutive desensitization, and removal of this region could increase basal activity by reducing desensitization. Recent findings about the B2 bradykinin receptor support this mechanism [157]. Additionally, 5‐HT4BR splice variants differ in their inclusion of PDZ interaction domains, which may further influence their signaling properties, thus increasing the complexity of this regulatory mechanism [144].
3.2.5. 5‐HT5R and 5‐HT6R
Previous research on 5‐HT5R has been relatively limited. Studies have identified two subtypes within the 5‐HT5R family: 5‐HT5AR and 5‐HT5BR [158]. Both subtypes have been cloned from rats and mice; however, only the 5‐HT5AR has been successfully cloned from humans [158]. 5‐HT5AR is expressed primarily in several brain regions, including the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, habenula, olfactory bulb, and granule layer of the cerebellum, whereas no 5‐HT5AR expression has been detected in peripheral tissues [159, 160]. To date, there is no conclusive evidence that 5‐HT5ARs are directly linked to specific physiological effects or signal transduction pathways in mammalian cells [161]. Recent studies have indicated that human 5‐HT5AR may be coupled to GIRK channels [162]. In addition, 5‐HT5AR may inhibit cAMP accumulation [3]. In addition to its effects on cAMP levels, the receptor has been implicated in other signaling pathways and the regulation of secondary messengers [163]. Treatment of cells with pertussis toxin abolishes the receptor's ability to inhibit adenosine diphosphate (ADP)‐ribosyl cyclase activity, suggesting that the receptor may signal through Gi/Go proteins. Furthermore, 5‐HT5AR has been shown to regulate intracellular Ca2+ mobilization via inositol triphosphate (IP3)‐sensitive calcium stores [164]. Nevertheless, the precise G protein subtypes, downstream signaling pathways, and physiological roles of 5‐HT5R have yet to be fully elucidated and warrant further investigation.
5‐HT6Rs are widely expressed in various brain regions, and they are predominantly distributed in the caudate nucleus, olfactory tubercle, striatum, hippocampus, and nucleus accumbens [165, 166]. Studies have shown that this receptor primarily regulates cholinergic neurotransmission in the CNS, suggesting its potential for use as a therapeutic target for learning and memory disorders [167]. Research has demonstrated that 5‐HT6Rs can stimulate AC activity in cultured striatal neurons and pig caudate nucleus membranes [168].
3.2.6. 5‐HT7R
5‐HT7R is highly expressed in the CNS, particularly in the hippocampus, hypothalamus, and neocortex [169, 170]. Owing to its expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the receptor may be involved in the regulation of circadian rhythms [171]. 5‐HT7R is also expressed in glial cells, the spleen, vascular smooth muscle, and the intestine [172].
5‐HT7R can activate AC, and most of its functions are likely mediated via its coupling with the G protein [173]. 5‐HT7R can stimulate several AC isoforms, including the Gs‐sensitive AC5 isoform and the calcium‐sensitive AC1 and AC8 isoforms [173]. The activation of 5‐HT7R leads to an increase in the intracellular Ca2+ concentration, which is consistent with the calcium sensitivity of AC1 and AC8. However, this increase in Ca2+ occurs independently of PKC, phosphoinositide signaling, or Gi proteins, suggesting the involvement of a nonclassical signaling pathway [174]. Furthermore, endogenously expressed 5‐HT7R can activate ERK1 and ERK2 in the MAPK pathway, and this activation is insensitive to pertussis toxin, indicating that it likely does not involve Gi/o proteins [175]. 5‐HT7R also contributes to vasorelaxation, potentially through mechanisms involving the release of NO or the cAMP‐mediated inhibition of myosin light chain kinase, leading to smooth muscle relaxation [170]. In the nervous system, 5‐HT7R is thought to inhibit calcium spike‐induced slow afterhyperpolarization in CA3 hippocampal neurons [171]. However, other studies have shown that the receptor may actually promote afterdepolarization [176]. Research in neurons of the anterodorsal thalamic nucleus has shown that 5‐HT7R‐mediated modulation of afterhyperpolarization is driven by cAMP and a hyperpolarization‐activated nonselective cation current [177]. This process occurs independently of PKA or changes in intracellular Ca2+ levels, suggesting that a novel signal transduction mechanism may be involved [178].
3.3. 5‐HTR Crosstalk and Integration
Recent studies have revealed that different 5‐HTR subtypes do not function in isolation but instead engage in functional “crosstalk” through various mechanisms [179]. This crosstalk can manifest as mutual regulation of signaling pathways, changes in ligand‐binding affinities, or even the physical formation of heterodimers or higher‐order receptor complexes [180]. These receptor–receptor interactions contribute to the high complexity and plasticity of the 5‐HT signaling network, playing a critical role in the fine‐tuning of neuronal functions.
For example, 5‐HT1AR and 5‐HT7R can undergo functional crosstalk or form heterodimers in specific brain regions, such as the hippocampus. The binding affinity of these compounds follows the order 5‐HT7R–5‐HT7R > 5‐HT7R–5‐HT1AR > 5‐HT1AR–5‐HT1AR [181]. Functionally, the activation of 5‐HT7R inhibits 5‐HT1AR‐mediated Gi signaling, significantly reduces GIRK channel activity, and promotes 5‐HT1AR internalization via the β‐arrestin/MAPK pathway [182]. 5‐HT2AR participates in crosstalk with several glutamate and DA receptors, such as metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) 2 and D2 receptor (D2R) [183]. In these interactions, the activation of one receptor may alter the ligand‐binding affinity and downstream signaling of the other [183]. For example, D2 receptor activation enhances the affinity of 5‐HT2AR for 5‐HT but simultaneously inhibits IP3 production, suggesting that Gq signaling is modulated by Gi pathways [184]. The activation of mGluR2 increases the affinity of 5‐HT2AR for 5‐HT, whereas the activation of 5‐HT2AR decreases the affinity of mGluR2 [179, 183]. Furthermore, 5‐HT2AR and presynaptic mGluR2/3 mutually regulate each other through downstream signaling [185]. Although they are colocalized at glutamatergic terminals in the PFC, 5‐HT2AR and mGluR2/3 do not form physical complexes but instead functionally interact in an antagonist‐like manner to modulate glutamate exocytosis [186, 187]. Crosstalk also occurs between ATP receptor (P2X4) and 5‐HT3R via their intracellular and transmembrane domains [188]. In addition, mGlu4 and 5‐HT1AR exhibit functional interactions, wherein mGlu4 activation suppresses 5‐HT1AR activity and subsequently reduces cAMP production [189]. A functional heteromer composed of 5‐HT2CR and oxytocin receptor (OTR), which functions as a 5‐HT2CR antagonist and enhances OT‐mediated hypoactivity in mice, has been identified [190]. Moreover, phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten (PTEN) physically interacts with the third intracellular loop (3L4F) of 5‐HT2CR and thus activates the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway; this highlights additional layers of complexity in 5‐HTR‐mediated signaling [191]. In brainstem raphe nuclei, autoreceptors such as 5‐HT1Rs negatively regulate 5‐HT release, whereas heteroreceptors that are located in the cortex influence emotion, cognition, and even sexual behavior. Chronic use of SSRIs can lead to desensitization of autoreceptors, indirectly enhancing heteroreceptor activity, which may explain the delayed onset of antidepressant efficacy. The activation of 5‐HTRs can initiate multiple intracellular signaling cascades, including the cAMP/PKA, PLC/PKC, and MAPK/ERK pathways. These pathways are often shared among different 5‐HTR subtypes, supporting a model of multipoint cooperative regulation [192].
In addition, inhibitory crosstalk between 5‐HT2BR and 5‐HT7R depends on NOX and PKA activity [193]. Similar inhibitory interactions have been observed among 5‐HT2AR, 5‐HT7R, A2A receptor, and CD73 in neuroblastoma cells [194]. These findings suggest that the mechanisms of action for atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants may not be limited to individual receptor signaling but rather involve the modulation of receptor heterodimers, such as 5‐HT2AR–mGluR2 or 5‐HT2AR–D2R.
Overall, a relatively clear understanding of the mechanisms of 5‐HT‐mediated signal transduction has been established, and studies have confirmed that 5‐HTRs play important roles in various tissues and organs. On the basis of known 5‐HT signaling pathways, the development of targeted drugs is providing new approaches and strategies for the treatment of multiple diseases.
3.4. Termination of Signaling
While the mechanisms by which 5‐HTRs are activated have been extensively studied, increasing attention has only recently been given to how 5‐HTR signaling is effectively terminated to prevent prolonged activation, which may lead to toxicity or functional dysregulation [195]. Previous research indicated that 5‐HTR signaling termination involves a series of finely tuned regulatory mechanisms, including receptor desensitization, phosphorylation, β‐arrestin recruitment, endocytosis/recycling and degradation, negative feedback loops, and modulation through receptor heteromerization [196, 197].
Receptor desensitization and phosphorylation represent the primary steps in signal termination [198]. When 5‐HT persistently stimulates its receptors, especially G protein‐coupled 5‐HTRs (e.g., 5‐HT1AR, 5‐HT2AR, and 5‐HT7R), the intracellular regions of these receptors are phosphorylated by G protein‐coupled receptor kinases, thereby promoting the recruitment of β‐arrestin, which in turn disrupts G protein coupling and leads to signal cessation [199, 200]. Moreover, β‐arrestin itself functions as a signaling scaffold, mediating noncanonical pathways such as MAPK/ERK signaling, and thus resulting in biased signaling [201].
Receptor endocytosis followed by either degradation or recycling is another crucial mechanism that modulates signal strength [202, 203]. After being phosphorylated and bound to β‐arrestin, a receptor is internalized into clathrin‐coated vesicles and trafficked to early endosomes [204]. Once internalized, receptors may follow one of two fates: degradation via lysosomal pathways, which reduces receptor availability at the membrane and thus increases cellular sensitivity to 5‐HT [196], or recycling back to the membrane to facilitate renewed signaling [203]. For example, 5‐HT2AR and 5‐HT2CR tend to be routed toward degradation after prolonged stimulation, whereas 5‐HT1AR receptors often exhibit high recycling capacity in certain cell types [203, 205, 206].
Negative feedback regulation also plays a critical role in signal termination. In the raphe nuclei, autoreceptors such as 5‐HT1BR and 5‐HT1DR sense extracellular 5‐HT levels and inhibit further 5‐HT release, thereby preventing overexcitation and potential neurotoxicity or network instability [207]. In recent years, studies on interreceptor crosstalk and heteromerization have expanded our understanding of the mechanisms that regulate signal termination. For example, 5‐HT7R and 5‐HT1AR can form heterodimers that influence each other's signaling efficiency and internalization rates [181]; additionally, functional coupling between 5‐HT2AR and receptors such as mGluR2 or D2R not only modulates downstream pathways but also may affect desensitization, internalization, or overall signaling duration [179, 183]. These receptor complexes do not always require direct physical interactions; functional synergy or antagonism alone can significantly alter receptor activity status, signaling persistence, and termination dynamics.
Importantly, signal termination is not merely a “shut‐off” process but rather lays the foundation for reshaping future responsiveness, including receptor resensitization, downregulation, or signal switching to alternative pathways. In summary, 5‐HTR signaling termination is a multilayered, dynamic, and highly regulated process that involves molecular‐level events (such as phosphorylation and endocytosis) as well as system‐level mechanisms (such as feedback control and receptor‒receptor interactions).
In conclusion, significant progress has been made in the study of 5‐HT‐mediated signaling mechanisms. However, further exploration is needed in areas such as the functional characterization of receptor subtypes, the integration of signaling networks, and the development of personalized therapeutic strategies to better understand their physiological roles and advance innovative treatments for related diseases.
4. Currently Available Therapeutics and Limitations in the Targeting of 5‐HT and its Receptors
On the basis of the signaling networks that are mediated by 5‐HT and 5‐HTR, as well as their extensive regulatory roles in both central and peripheral physiological processes, researchers have gradually developed a variety of modulators that target the 5‐HT system [208]. In recent years, research on the effects of 5‐HT modulators on multiple systems, including the nervous system, cardiovascular system, and endocrine system, has made significant progress. Currently, the therapeutic effects of various 5‐HT‐related drugs in disease treatment have been evaluated. Therefore, further exploration of the potential of these drugs for use in clinical application is essential. The therapeutic effects of 5‐HT modulators in cancer treatment are among the currently popular research topics in the field of oncology (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Effects of agonists and antagonists of 5‐HT metabolism‐related enzymes and 5‐HTRs.
| Molecule | Target | Cancer type | Clinical development for cancer treatment | Mechanism | Effects | Clinical diseases | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LP‐533401 | ‐Tph1 | Breast cancer | In preclinical development | Inhibits the synthesis of 5‐HT by breast tumor cells, thereby reducing the effect of 5‐HT through autocrine or paracrine pathways | Reduces breast cancer stem cell frequency | Functional gastrointestinal disorders | [209] |
| Telotristat ethyl (TE) | ‐Tph1 | Pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, NET, cholangiocarcinoma | In phase II and III clinical trials | (a) Enhances the accumulation and effect of CD8+ T cells; (b) decreases 5‐HT‐mediated PD‐L1 expression | Inhibits tumor growth | Carcinoid syndrome | [210, 211, 212, 213] |
| LX‐1031 | ‐Tph1 | Glioma | In phase I clinical trial | Inhibits 5‐HT‐induced activation of the L1CAM/NF‐κB signaling pathway | Inhibits tumor cell proliferation, migration and chemoresistance | Functional gastrointestinal disorders | [214] |
| p‐CPA | ‐Tph1 | Cholangiocarcinoma | In preclinical development | Inhibits 5‐HT‐induced activation of 5HT1AR, 5HT2AR, 5HT2BR, 5HT4R, and 5HT6R | Inhibits tumor growth | [215] | |
| Fluoxetine | ‐SERT | Various cancer types | In preclinical development | (a) Decreases tumor cyclin D3, cyclin E and cyclin B expression; (b) increases the number of circulating CD8+ T lymphocytes and promotes IFN‐γ and TNF‐α secretion | (a) Inhibits tumor growth; (b) promotes tumor apoptosis; (c) promotes T cell‐mediated immunity | Depression, anxiety disorder, obsessive–compulsive disorder, bulimia | [216, 217, 218] |
| Citalopram | ‐SERT | Colon cancer | In preclinical development | Inhibits TGF‐β signaling in tumors | Inhibits tumor cell proliferation and migration | Depression, anxiety disorders | [219] |
| Sertraline | ‐SERT | Breast cancer, lung cancer, lymphoma | In preclinical development | (a) Inhibits autocrine or paracrine pathways; (b) decreases tumor cyclin D3, cyclin E, and cyclin B expression; (c) inhibits AMPK/mTOR pathway signaling in NSCLC cells | (a) Inhibits tumor growth; (b) promotes antitumor immunity | Depression, social phobia, obsessive–compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder | [209, 220, 221, 222] |
| Paroxetine | ‐SERT | Breast cancer | In phase II and III clinical trials | Suppresses autocrine or paracrine pathways | Reduces breast cancer stem cell frequency | Depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive–compulsive disorder, menopausal mood disorders | [209] |
| Clorgyline | ‐MAO‐A | Various cancer types | In preclinical development | (a) Reduces the expression of oncogenes FOS, JUN, NF‐κB, and Myc, as well as cell cycle regulators CCND1, CCNE1, and CDK4/6; (b) inhibits tumor T cell and TAM auto secretion of 5‐HT signaling to promote antitumor immunity | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation, metastasis, and invasion; (b) decreases tumor microvessel density; (c) increases immune cell infiltration | [223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229] | |
| Phenelzine | ‐MAO‐A | Prostate cancer, melanoma, colorectal cancer | In phase II and III clinical trial | (a) Suppresses Enz/ARv7/hair‐A signaling in tumor cells; (b) inhibits the secretion of 5‐HT by tumor‐infiltrating T cells and TAMs to promote antitumor immunity | (a) Inhibits the growth and increase in tumor in vitro and in vivo; (b) promotes immune cell infiltration | [227, 229, 230] | |
| NAN‐190 | −5‐HT1AR | Various cancer types | In preclinical development | (a) Blocks MAPK and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways; (b) blocks signaling pathways that are involved in protein translation and survival, such as the Akt/mTOR pathway | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation and metastasis; (b) inhibits tumor microvessel density; (c) increases immune cell infiltration | [231, 232] | |
| WAY‐100635 | −5‐HT1AR | Lymphoma | In preclinical development | (a) Inhibits cell proliferation and metabolism through transcription and translation (e.g., Akt, GSK‐3β, cMyc, and p53); (b) regulates mitochondrial activity by reducing mitochondrial membrane potential and decreasing dehydrogenase activity | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation; (b) promotes apoptosis | [233] | |
| SB216641 | −5‐HT1BR | Uterine leiomyoma, liver cancer | In preclinical development | (a) Decreases cyclin D1 and α‐SMA expression and decreases MAPK, ERK, and EF2K pathway activation; (b) induces caspase‐8, caspase‐9, and caspase‐3 activation | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation; (b) promotes apoptosis | [131, 234] | |
| GR127935 | −5‐HT1DR | Colorectal cancer | In preclinical development | Blocks the Axin1/β‐catenin/MMP‐7 signaling pathway | Inhibits tumor metastasis and invasion | [235] | |
| BRL54443 | −5‐HT1ER | Ovarian cancer | In preclinical development | Activates SRC‐mediated downstream signaling pathways and significantly promotes cell proliferation and EMT | Promotes tumor growth and peritoneal spread | [236] | |
| Ketanserin | −5‐HT2AR | Choriocarcinoma, breast cancer, lung cancer | In preclinical development | (a) Inhibits MEK‐ERK1/2 and Jak2–STAT3 signaling; (b) inhibits Jak1/STAT3/ERK1/2 and AC/PKA signaling | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation and viability; (b) inhibits tumor cell glycolysis and mitochondrial biogenesis | Hypertension, Raynaud's phenomenon | [108, 237] |
| SB204741 | −5‐HT2BR | Various cancer types | In preclinical development | (a) Downregulates FOXO3a expression in tumor cells; (b) blocks the 5‐HT–5‐HT2BR–pERK–Yap axis; (c) blocks 5‐HT induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and eNOS; (d) inhibits 5‐HT‐mediated upregulation of STAB1 and SERPINB2 gene expression | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation; (b) promotes macrophage polarization toward the M1 phenotype; (c) reduces tumor microvessel density | [238, 239, 240, 241, 242] | |
| PRX08066 | −5‐HT2BR | Neuroendocrine tumors | In preclinical development | (a) Inhibits many signaling pathways (e.g., WNT, focal adhesion kinase, and Jak/STAT); (b) inhibits ERK1/2 phosphorylation and profibrotic growth factor synthesis and TGFβ1, CTGF, and FGF2 secretion | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation, metastasis and invasion; (b) inhibits MET fibroblast proliferation | [243, 244] | |
| SB215505 | −5‐HT2BR | Prostate cancer | In preclinical development | Regulates the production of IL‐6, IL‐1β, and TNF‐α by fibroblasts | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation, metastasis and invasion; (b) inhibits MET fibroblast proliferation | [245, 246] | |
| Palonosetron | −5‐HT3R | Lung cancer | CINV/RINV | (a) Blocks ERK pathway‐induced autophagy in tumor cells; (b) inhibits LC3 protein expression | (a) Inhibits cell proliferation and migration; (b) suppresses the formation of tumor colonies | [247] | |
| Ramosetron | −5‐HT3R | Lung cancer | CINV/RINV | (a) Blocks ERK pathway‐induced autophagy in tumor cells; (b) inhibits LC3 protein expression | (a) Inhibits cell proliferation and migration; (b) suppresses the formation of tumor colonies | [247, 248] | |
| Tropisetron | −5‐HT3R | Colorectal cancer, melanoma, lung cancer | CINV/RINV | (a) Inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome activation; (b) promotes apoptosis, microtubule depolymerization, ERK activation, and NF‐κB downregulation | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation; (b) alleviates inflammation; (c) promotes apoptosis; (d) promotes microtubule depolymerization | Nausea and vomiting induced by radiotherapy/chemotherapy | [120, 123, 249] |
| Ondansetron | −5‐HT3R | Pancreatic cancer | CINV/RINV | Inhibits Ca2+ mobilization in tumor cells | Inhibits tumor cell proliferation | Nausea and vomiting induced by radiotherapy/chemotherapy | [249, 250, 251] |
| RS23597‐190 | −5‐HT4R | Prostate cancer | In preclinical development | Blocks cell cycle progression in the M phase | Inhibits tumor cell proliferation | [245] | |
| Prucalopride | +5‐HT4R | Glioma | In preclinical development | Induces autophagy via the Akt–mTOR pathway | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation, migration and invasion; (b) promotes apoptosis; (c) promotes cell autophagy | Chronic constipation | [252] |
| Mosapride | +5‐HT4R | Various cancer types | In preclinical development | Blocks cell cycle progression | Inhibits angiogenesis | Indigestion, gastroparesis | [253] |
| SB699551 | −5‐HT5AR | Breast cancer | In preclinical development | Inhibits Gαi/o signaling and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation; (b) reduces tumorsphere frequency | [162] | |
| Valerenic Acid | +5‐HT5AR | Glioblastoma | In preclinical development | (a) Inhibits 5‐HT‐induced angiogenesis and tumor growth through the PI3K/NOX pathway; (b) increases ROS levels in GBM cells; (c) activates the AMPK pathway | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion; (b) promotes tumor cell death | Auxiliary treatments for insomnia, anxiety | [254] |
| SB258719 | −5‐HT7R | Hepatocellular carcinoma | In preclinical development | Inhibits Wnt/β‐catenin signaling | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation; (b) promotes tumor cell autophagy | [255] | |
| SB269970 | −5‐HT7R | Various cancer types | In preclinical development | (a) Inhibits PI3K/Akt phosphorylation; (b) inhibits cAMP/PKA and CREB activity; (c) inhibits PKCɛ‐ and P38‐induced IL‐6 production | (a) Inhibits tumor cell proliferation; (b) promotes tumor apoptosis; (c) promotes the polarization of macrophages toward the M1 phenotype | [242, 256, 257, 258, 259] | |
| LP211 | +5‐HT7R | Non‐small cell lung cancer | In preclinical development | Activates the Akt and P38 signaling pathways | (a) Promotes tumor cell colony formation; (b) promotes tumor cell migration and invasion | [260] |
+agonist, −antagonist.
4.1. Drugs Targeting 5‐HT Metabolic Enzymes
The biosynthesis and metabolism of 5‐HT are crucial for the regulation of its functions in the body [208]. Changes in the activity of metabolic enzymes not only affect the concentration of 5‐HT but also are directly related to the occurrence and progression of various diseases.
4.1.1. Tph Inhibitors Reduce 5‐HT Synthesis
Tph1, which is the rate‐limiting enzyme in 5‐HT synthesis, has gained attention because of its role in biology [208]. Although 5‐HT production can be increased by Tph1 agonists, no Tph1 agonists are currently available for use in the clinic. Antagonists of Tph1 aim to inhibit 5‐HT synthesis. Telotristat ethyl (TE), which is an oral inhibitor of Tph1, has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) to relieve diarrhea symptoms in patients with carcinoid syndrome [210]. Additionally, a Teleace study revealed that cancer patients who were treated with TE experienced a reduction in tumor size [211]. LX‐1031 is a selective peripheral Tph1 inhibitor that was developed for the treatment of diarrhea‐predominant IBS (IBS‐D) [261]. The drug entered phase II clinical trials and demonstrated a certain degree of efficacy and safety because it inhibited intestinal 5‐HT synthesis to alleviate hypermotility symptoms [262]. However, owing to its limited therapeutic efficacy, the development of LX‐1031 has not continued beyond this stage [263]. Moreover, pCPA has been widely used in animal studies to create 5‐HT depletion models for investigations of the roles of 5‐HT in anxiety, depression, aggression, and cognitive function [264]. However, its poor selectivity, irreversible inhibition, and severe side effects have limited its potential for clinical application [265] (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3.

Effects of serotonin (5‐HT) metabolic enzyme antagonists on tumors. Tph1 antagonists block 5‐HT synthesis, resulting in increased tumor cell apoptosis and decreased tumor cell proliferation and migration. MAO‐A antagonists block 5‐HT degradation, resulting in a decrease in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and the suppression of tumor cell autophagy and DNA repair.
In conclusion, the Tph1 inhibitor TE is currently used in clinical practice to treat carcinoid syndrome. However, the clinical use of other inhibitors has been discontinued because of severe side effects. Therefore, the development of drugs with fewer side effects and greater targeting specificity has become a possible future research direction.
4.1.2. SSRIs Inhibit 5‐HT Reuptake
The use of these medications varies slightly among different populations. For example, fluoxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine, and escitalopram are approved for use in patients under 25 years of age, whereas citalopram is generally not used in children [266]. Vilazodone, which has partial 5‐HT1AR agonistic activity, is approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults [267]. Paroxetine is also used to treat menopausal hot flashes and premature ejaculation [268]. Furthermore, SSRIs have applications in migraine, fibromyalgia, IBS, and other nontypical indications [269].
Although SSRIs are effective, their side effects require attention. Common side effects include GI discomfort (such as nausea and diarrhea), headache, insomnia or somnolence, and sexual dysfunction [270]. Citalopram may lead to QT interval prolongation [271, 272]. Owing to its short half‐life, pahroxetine may cause significant discontinuation syndrome, whereas fluoxetine, which has a longer half‐life, has a milder withdrawal effect [273]. Overall, citalopram, fluvoxamine, and paroxetine are associated with slightly higher rates of adverse effects, with citalopram exhibiting the best GI tolerability [267]. In clinical practice, differences among individual patients, drug metabolism characteristics, and potential drug interactions should be considered in the selection of SSRIs. For example, paroxetine may antagonize the metabolism of tamoxifen via CYP2D6, potentially influencing its antitumor effect [274, 275]. Additionally, SSRIs should be used with caution in children, pregnant women, and patients with cardiovascular diseases to ensure drug safety [276].
In summary, SSRIs have been widely used in clinical practice. Recent studies have revealed their potential value in other diseases, such as cancer; thus, further expanding their range of applications will become an important direction for future research.
4.1.3. MAO‐A Inhibitors Block 5‐HT Degradation
MAO‐A is primarily responsible for the breakdown of neurotransmitters, such as 5‐HT, norepinephrine (NE), and DA; therefore, MAO‐A regulates the concentrations of these neurotransmitters in the nervous system and affects mood, stress responses, and various physiological functions [277]. MAO‐A inhibitors (MAOIs) function by inhibiting the activity of MAO‐A, thereby increasing the concentrations of these neurotransmitters and ameliorating mood disorders such as depression and anxiety [278]. Currently, the major MAOIs that have been approved by the US FDA include hydrazine derivatives (isoniazid, iproniazid, and phenelzine), nonhydrazine derivatives, and selective MAOIs (moclobemide, toloxatone, and brofaromine) [279].
MAOIs have a long history of use in treating depression, particularly in patients who do not respond to conventional antidepressants such as SSRIs [278]. Medications such as phenelzine and moclobemide increase the concentrations of 5‐HT, NE, and other neurotransmitters by inhibiting MAO‐A, thereby ameliorating depressive symptoms [280]. MAOIs are also used to treat generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder [281]. By increasing 5‐HT levels in the brain, MAOIs can effectively alleviate anxiety symptoms. Although MAOIs have potential for use in the treatment of anxiety, they are typically not used as first‐line therapies because of their notable side effects. Some MAOIs have been shown to have therapeutic effects on migraines, particularly in patients with migraines accompanied by depressive symptoms [282]. In patients with depression, MAOIs can ameliorate symptoms such as appetite loss and weight loss [283]. These medications alleviate appetite issues related to depression by increasing 5‐HT levels [283].
Although MAOIs have significant therapeutic effects in the treatment of many conditions, they also have several limitations and side effects [284]. MAOIs can cause severe adverse reactions when combined with foods containing tyramine (such as cheese, cured meats, and soy sauce) and various other medications. These adverse reactions include dizziness, insomnia, muscle weakness, blurred vision, hyperreflexia, respiratory difficulties, and changes in blood counts [285, 286, 287]. Specifically, owing to their shorter half‐life, MAOIs such as paroxetine may result in significant withdrawal symptoms, making discontinuation more challenging [288].
In conclusion, MAOIs have certain clinical application value in the treatment of depression, anxiety, social phobia, and other psychiatric disorders. Although MAOIs can effectively increase neurotransmitter levels and ameliorate mood and behavioral symptoms in patients, owing to the risks of side effects and drug interactions, MAOIs are typically used as second‐line treatment options. Close monitoring and consideration of differences among individual patients are necessary when these medications are used.
4.2. Drugs Targeting 5‐HTRs
In recent years, the development of drugs that target 5‐HTRs has made significant progress, especially in the fields of neuro‐psychiatric disease, cardiovascular disease, and cancer treatment, demonstrating great application prospects. This section summarizes the role of drugs that target 5‐HTRs in disease treatment.
4.2.1. 5‐HT2R Agonists and Antagonists
The 5‐HT2R family includes three subtypes, namely, 5‐HT2AR, 5‐HT2BR, and 5‐HT2CR, which play key roles in various physiological and pathological processes. These receptors are regulated by agonists or antagonists and have broad clinical application potential [289].
5‐HT2AR agonists directly stimulate 5‐HT2AR, thus affecting cognitive, emotional, and perceptual functions. In recent years, research on 5‐HT2AR agonists has focused primarily on treating mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, and schizophrenia [290]. Lysergic acid diethylamide and psilocybin are typical 5‐HT2AR agonists and have shown potential in the treatment of treatment‐resistant depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and anxiety, especially in the fields of palliative care and psychological counseling [291, 292]. However, 5‐HT2AR agonists are often accompanied by intense hallucinogenic effects; thus, their clinical application requires strict regulation and supervision. 5‐HT2CR agonists, particularly lorcaserin, are used as antiobesity drugs on the market [293]. However, owing to its association with risk of cancer development, lorcaserin has been withdrawn from the market [293, 294].
5‐HT2AR antagonists have become first‐line drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder. For example, clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone, which are typical atypical antipsychotics, antagonize 5‐HT2AR to ameliorate symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions in psychiatric patients, with fewer side effects than traditional drugs such as chlorpromazine [295, 296, 297]. 5‐HT2BR antagonists (e.g., sarpogrelate) are used to treat cardiovascular diseases, especially ischemic symptoms such as ulcers, pain, and cold sensations caused by chronic arterial occlusion [298, 299]. 5‐HT2CR antagonists have been used to ameliorate depression and anxiety and have shown potential for appetite control. Some antidepressants, such as azelastine, are both antihistamines and 5‐HT2CR antagonists and can be used to alleviate appetite loss and weight loss caused by depression [300].
The 5‐HT2R agonist DOI has been shown to stimulate dendritic cell activation [301]. The 5‐HT2AR antagonist ketanserin can inhibit the proliferation of JEG‐3 and BeWo choriocarcinoma cells [108]. The 5‐HT2BR antagonist SB204741 significantly inhibits the proliferation of Huh7 cells [238]. Additionally, SB204741 reduces microvessel density in the context of lung cancer and melanoma [239]. The 5‐HT2BR agonist BW‐723C86 enhances the anti‐inflammatory properties of macrophages [302].
Significant research progress has been made in the use of 5‐HT2R agonists and 5‐HT2R antagonists in the clinical treatment of mental illnesses, cardiovascular diseases, and obesity. Although these drugs have shown considerable efficacy in treating certain diseases, agonists and antagonists are also associated with side effects and risks; in particular, 5‐HT2AR agonists are associated with hallucinogenic effects, and 5‐HT2BR agonists are associated with cardiac side effects. With further clinical research and drug safety evaluations, drugs that regulate 5‐HT2R still hold vast application potential.
4.2.2. 5‐HT3R Agonists and Antagonists
5‐HT3R is an important neurotransmitter receptor that plays a key role in both the central and peripheral nervous systems. It is particularly involved in regulating nausea, vomiting, GI motility, mood, and other physiological functions [303]. Unlike other G protein‐coupled receptors, 5‐HT3R is unique in that it is a ligand‐gated ion channel that directly influences the cellular membrane potential by modulating ion flow [119]. In recent years, research on 5‐HT3R antagonists has made significant progress, showing broad potential for the use of these agents in the clinic.
These antagonists function by preventing the activation of 5‐HT3Rs, thereby reducing the physiological responses associated with receptor activation, especially under conditions such as nausea, vomiting, and pain [304, 305]. 5‐HT3R antagonists, such as ondansetron, granisetron, and dolasetron, are widely used to prevent and treat the nausea and vomiting that are caused by chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery [306]. These agents effectively reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting by blocking the 5‐HT3R‐mediated emetic reflex [307]. Alosetron, which is another 5‐HT3R antagonist, alleviates diarrhea and abdominal pain in patients with IBS by inhibiting 5‐HT3R in the gut [308]. Although its efficacy is well established, the drug is associated with rare but serious side effects, such as severe constipation and ischemic colitis, and therefore requires strict monitoring during use [308]. Studies have also indicated that 5‐HT3R antagonists may offer auxiliary analgesic benefits in patients with conditions such as cancer pain and postoperative pain [309]. However, this indication is still in the preclinical or early clinical research stages. Emerging evidence also suggests that 5‐HT3R antagonists may have modulatory effects on anxiety and depressive‐like behaviors. Animal studies and small‐scale clinical trials have shown promising results, although larger clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings [310].
The 5‐HT3R agonist 2‐methylserotonin enhances 5‐HT3R‐dependent Ca2+ influx in immature and mature dendritic cells (DCs) [301]. In addition, the 5‐HT3R agonist 2‐methylserotonin promotes T cell activation and proliferation from the S phase to the G2/M phase of the cell cycle [311]. The 5‐HT3R antagonists palonosetron and ramosetron effectively inhibit tumor growth and colony formation [247].
In conclusion, 5‐HT3R antagonists have become essential therapeutic agents in the management of nausea, vomiting, and IBS, whereas the use of agonists remains largely in the exploratory phase. Both classes of drugs show promising potential for treating various diseases, but further clinical trials and long‐term safety evaluations are necessary to support their broader application.
4.2.3. 5‐HT1R Agonists and Antagonists
5‐HT1R plays a crucial role in regulating neurotransmitter release, and it is involved in processes such as emotional regulation, vasoconstriction, and pain transmission [124]. In recent years, research on 5‐HT1R agonists and antagonists has continued to progress, revealing the broad therapeutic potential of these agents in the treatment of psychiatric disorders, neuropathic pain, and cardiovascular diseases [312, 313].
5‐HT1AR agonists are the most extensively studied subtype of 5‐HT1R‐targeting drugs, and they are widely used to treat psychiatric disorders such as anxiety, depression, and schizophrenia [314]. A typical agent, buspirone, is a partial 5‐HT1AR agonist with antidepressant and anxiolytic effects, and it is associated with a low risk of dependence [315]. Newer antidepressants, such as vilazodone and vortioxetine, combine SSRIs with partial 5‐HT1AR agonism, and these antidepressants are thought to more effectively alleviate depressive symptoms and cognitive impairment in patients with mood disorders [316, 317, 318]. 5‐HT1AR antagonists such as WAY‐100635 are mainly used in experimental research to investigate receptor function, and they have limited clinical application [319]. 5‐HT1B/1DR agonists, also known as “triptans,” including sumatriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan, are the primary medications that are used for migraine treatment [320, 321, 322]. These drugs alleviate headache symptoms by constricting dilated intracranial blood vessels and inhibiting proinflammatory neuropeptide release [323]. Despite their efficacy, triptans can cause vasoconstriction‐related side effects, such as coronary artery spasms, and they should therefore be used cautiously in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease [324]. To mitigate cardiovascular risk, 5‐HT1FR agonists such as lasmiditan have been developed as a new generation of antimigraine medications. Unlike triptans, lasmiditan does not induce vasoconstriction, and it has been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of acute migraine attacks, for which it has demonstrated both efficacy and safety [312, 325].
Research on 5‐HT1R antagonists is relatively limited, and these antagonists are primarily used to investigate the physiological and pathological roles of 5‐HT1Rs [326]. The 5‐HT1R antagonist NAN‐190 induces G2/M phase arrest in HT‐29 cells, whereas the 5‐HT1BR antagonist SB224289 causes apoptosis [326]. The 5‐HT1BR agonist AnHcl has been shown to stimulate DCs activation [301]. The 5‐HT1DR antagonist GR127935 effectively inhibits tumor metastasis [235]. Currently, there are no widely used clinical drugs that function as selective 5‐HT1R antagonists.
In summary, 5‐HT1R agonists, particularly agonists of the 5‐HT1AR and 5‐HT1B/1DR subtypes, have significant therapeutic value in the treatment of anxiety, depression, and migraine. The emergence of 5‐HT1FR receptor agonists offers a novel option for migraine treatment without cardiovascular risk. Research on other subtypes and a greater understanding of receptor function may further expand the applications of 5‐HT1R‐targeted drugs in the treatment of neurological, psychiatric, and vascular disorders.
4.2.4. 5‐HT4R Agonists and Antagonists
5‐HT4Rs are widely distributed in the CNS, GI tract, and cardiovascular system, where they regulate various physiological functions, including GI motility, cognitive function, neurotransmitter release, and cardiac function [327]. In recent years, research on 5‐HT4R agonists and antagonists has continued to advance.
5‐HT4R agonists are primarily used to enhance GI motility [328]. Drugs such as mosapride, prucalopride, and tegaserod have demonstrated significant efficacy in treating chronic constipation, gastroparesis, and constipation‐predominant IBS (IBS‐C) [329, 330]. These agents activate 5‐HT4Rs in the GI tract, promoting ACh release and thereby enhancing intestinal peristalsis. Prucalopride, which is a selective 5‐HT4R agonist, has better cardiac safety, whereas tegaserod has been associated with cardiovascular side effects [331]. In addition to GI indications, 5‐HT4R agonists have shown promise in ameliorating cognitive impairments and depressive symptoms [332]. Studies have demonstrated that 5‐HT4R agonists can enhance learning and memory functions and may have potential antidepressant and antidementia effects [333]. Animal studies also suggest that these drugs may augment the effects of SSRIs and accelerate the onset of antidepressant action [334]. 5‐HT4R antagonists are mainly used in experimental models.
In summary, the use of 5‐HT4R agonists for the treatment of GI motility disorders has been well established, but their applications in the neuropsychiatric and cardiovascular fields remain at the preclinical or early clinical trial stages. With further understanding of the mechanisms underlying receptor‐mediated functions and the development of new selective drugs, 5‐HT4R‐related therapeutics are expected to play broader roles in the treatment of various systemic diseases.
4.2.5. 5‐HT5R and 5‐HT6R Agonists and Antagonists
5‐HT5R mainly refers to the 5‐HT5AR subtype. Research suggests that 5‐HT5AR may play a role in regulating circadian rhythms, cognition, mood, depression, and schizophrenia [335]. Research on agonists of this receptor is still in its early stages, and no drugs have been marketed yet. Research on antagonists of this receptor, however, is relatively more advanced. For example, SB‐699551 has been shown to have antidepressant, cognition‐enhancing, and anxiolytic effects in animal studies [159].
5‐HT6Rs are closely related to learning, memory, and cognitive disorders. 5‐HT6R antagonists have been used to treat alzheimer’s disease (AD) and cognitive impairments [336]. Idalopirdine has been investigated in multiple clinical trials to assess its ability to ameliorate cognitive function in AD patients, but large‐scale phase III trials have failed to meet primary endpoints [337]. SUVN‐502 and intepirdine were once highly anticipated as adjunctive treatments for AD, but their efficacy was disappointing in later‐stage studies, and their development was hindered [337, 338, 339].
Currently, both 5‐HT5AR and 5‐HT6R remain relatively underexplored but promising targets, with related drugs still in preclinical research stages.
4.2.6. 5‐HT7R Agonists and Antagonists
5‐HT7Rs are widely involved in regulating various physiological functions, including mood, cognition, sleep, and temperature regulation [171]. In recent years, research on 5‐HT7R agonists and antagonists has increased, revealing their potential therapeutic value in various neuropsychiatric disorders [169].
Research on 5‐HT7R agonists is relatively limited and has focused mainly on exploring their effects on neurofunction, mood regulation, and cognition [175]. In animal models, 5‐HT7R agonists, such as AS19, have shown promising effects in ameliorating cognitive deficits and mood disorders [340]. For example, AS19 promotes M2 phenotypic polarization and cytokine production in macrophages [302]. Additionally, AS19 promotes T cell activation and proliferation [341]. However, despite the significant research potential of agonists, their clinical application remains at an early stage and lacks sufficient clinical validation.
In contrast, research on 5‐HT7R antagonists is more developed, and they have been used in the treatment of various diseases. Some 5‐HT7R antagonists, such as SB‐269970 and LY‐3154207, have been shown to ameliorate depression, anxiety, and cognitive dysfunction in animal models [342, 343]. In addition, 5‐HT7R antagonists have been shown to improve sleep quality, helping alleviate insomnia and other sleep‐related symptoms [344]. Some studies also suggest that 5‐HT7R antagonists may play a role in temperature regulation. The 5‐HT7R antagonist SB258719 can effectively inhibit the proliferation of liver cancer cells [255]; SB‐258719 also inhibits the growth of xenograft tumors in patients with primary liver cancer [256, 345], modulates cytokine release from DCs, and inhibits ERK signaling in T cells [341].
Overall, both 5‐HT metabolism and 5‐HTR agonists and antagonists have broad potential in the treatment of various diseases. Despite the promising efficacy of these drugs, further clinical trials and drug safety evaluations are needed to advance their clinical application.
5. Emerging Therapeutic Opportunities
In recent years, with the successive development of various related drugs, the role of 5‐HT in the treatment of various systemic diseases has attracted increasing attention [290]. Studies have shown that targeting 5‐HT has extensive therapeutic potential, particularly in cancer, immune disorders, neuropsychiatric conditions, metabolic syndromes, and GI diseases [346]. As research continues to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the 5‐HT signaling network under pathological conditions, its potential for use as a target for multitarget intervention platforms is gradually emerging, resulting in the development of a series of novel therapeutic strategies (Figure 4).
FIGURE 4.

Effects of serotonin (5‐HT) receptor (5‐HTR) regulators on diseases. Blocking 5‐HTRs on the cell surface regulates the progression of a variety of diseases. These include psychiatric diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, liver diseases, diabetes, and tumors. In tumors, blockade of 5‐HTRs inhibits the proliferation and migration of tumor cells and induces their apoptosis.
5.1. The 5‐HT System and Cancer
Recent studies have shown that 5‐HT and 5‐HTRs play significant roles in the occurrence, development, and treatment of cancer [347, 348]. The interactions between the 5‐HT system and the TME, as well as processes such as tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and tumor immune escape, are closely related to this system and have become emerging topics in research in the field of cancer treatment.
5.1.1. Role of 5‐HT Metabolism in Cancer
5‐HT synthesis, transport, and degradation are collectively referred to as 5‐HT metabolism [346]. Tph1 increases the intracellular 5‐HT level, SERT promotes the transport of 5‐HT from the extracellular space to the intracellular space, and MAO‐A reduces the intracellular 5‐HT level by degrading 5‐HT [346]. This review includes a summary of the roles of 5‐HT metabolism‐related enzymes in various types of cancer. Various enzymes that are related to 5‐HT metabolism are abnormally expressed in many tumors and cause 5‐HT metabolic disorders [349]. Therefore, the study of 5‐HT metabolism is very important because 5‐HT metabolism is a potential target for cancer treatment [348].
Recent studies have shown that cancers, such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, breast cancer, glioblastoma, and colorectal cancer, exhibit 5‐HT accumulation, which is accompanied by increased tumor cell proliferation and growth [214, 215, 258, 350, 351, 352]. Clinical and experimental data indicate that increased 5‐HT levels lead to glioma progression and shortened overall survival times. Mechanistically, 5‐HT promotes cell proliferation, invasive migration, and resistance [214]. In 5‐HT‐related pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, exposure to 5‐HT activates the transforming growth factor (TGF)‐β signaling pathway in pancreatic stellate cells, which is associated with extracellular matrix remodeling; thus, exposure to 5‐HT promotes tumor progression [353]. A reduction in 5‐HT expression can significantly reduce the proliferation of cholangiocarcinoma cells, leading to increased tumor necrosis, enhanced tumor fibrosis, and slowed tumor growth [215]. Additionally, a reduction in 5‐HT can suppress the growth of tumor‐initiating cells and exert a synergistic effect with chemotherapy on the growth of xenografted breast cancer tissue [209]. The use of SSRIs to increase 5‐HT levels before and after the diagnosis of breast cancer has been shown to increase the mortality rate in patients with breast cancer [354]. Clinical data indicate that men with depression who are receiving long‐term SSRI treatment‐induced 5‐HT accumulation and have a significantly increased risk of developing malignant breast cancer [355]. 5‐HT also increases the Ki67 expression and tumor weight of breast cancer and carcinoid tumors [356, 357]. In Tph1‐knockout mice, peripheral 5‐HT levels are significantly decreased, and in Tph1‐knockout mice with colorectal or pancreatic cancer, tumor growth is markedly slower. Furthermore, the expression of the programmed death 1 (PD‐1) ligand 1 (PD‐L1) in tumor cells is reduced, and the accumulation of functional CD8+ T cells is increased [212]. In Tph−/− mice, colorectal cancer xenografts exhibit reduced tumor growth and angiogenesis, leading to slower subcutaneous tumor growth, spontaneous tumor necrosis, and tumor hypoxia [350]. Moreover, Tph1 knockout effectively reduces carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)‐induced liver tumor formation [358]. 5‐HT enters cells via SERT and activates the Ras homolog family member A (RhoA)/Rho‐associated kinases (ROCKs)/Yes‐associated protein (Yap) signaling pathway, thereby promoting the development of colon cancer [359]. Furthermore, colorectal cancer stem cells synthesize large amounts of 5‐HT, promoting the self‐renewal of cancer stem cells and playing a significant role in the development and metastasis of colorectal cancer [360]. Therefore, inhibiting peripheral 5‐HT synthesis may have therapeutic applications, such as in the prevention of cancer progression [361]. The elevated levels of circulating free 5‐HT induced by SSRI treatment promote the progression of cholangiocarcinoma [362]. 5‐HT promotes the apoptosis of Burkitt lymphoma cells [363]. 5‐HT in neutrophils is activated through histone H3 modification, promoting liver metastasis of neuroendocrine prostate cancer [364]. SSRIs block 5‐HT transport into neutrophils and inhibit 5‐HT‐mediated H3 modification, reversing prostate cancer liver metastasis [365]. 5‐HT also inhibits the neural invasion of prostate cancer cells through semaphorin 3C (SEMA3C)/PlexinA2/neuropilin‐1 (NRP1)/cellular‐mesenchumal epithelial transition factor (cMET) signaling, which reduces the density of tumor‐infiltrating nerve fibers and promotes the growth and migration of mouse xenograft tumors [366]. 5‐HT suppresses the induction of MAO‐A expression; promotes cancer cell proliferation and migration by activating downstream molecules, such as p21, matrix metalloproteinases 2 (MMP2), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); and promotes epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) and hypoxia inducible factor‐1 (HIF1) α protein accumulation [367, 368]. Additionally, 5‐HT is highly expressed in classical Hodgkin lymphoma cells. 5‐HT suppresses the induction of MAO‐A expression, inhibits tumor cell proliferation and is efficacious in the majority of patients when combined with adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, or dacarbazine (ABVD) [228]. This regimen presumably sensitizes tumor cells to ABVD treatment. However, approximately 20% of patients experience refractory disease or relapse after initial treatment [228]. Additionally, 5‐HT reduces the ability of induced MAO‐A to affect the TME and hinder tumor immunotherapy. Wang et al. [226] reported that suppressing the 5‐HT‐mediated induction of MAO‐A promotes the polarization of TAMs toward the M2 phenotype via oxidative stress. Furthermore, 5‐HT suppresses the induction of MAO‐A expression, inhibits tumor‐associated macrophage (TAM) reprogramming, induces tumor growth in xenograft tumor models, and reduces synergistic antitumor effects when combined with anti‐PD‐1 therapy [226]. Wang et al. [227] reported that 5‐HT suppresses the induced MAO‐A‐mediated suppression of antitumor T cell immunity by regulating autocrine 5‐HT signaling in tumor‐infiltrating CD8+ T cells [227].
Furthermore, some studies have suggested that 5‐HT overproduction can inhibit tumor development [369, 370]. 5‐HT can inhibit the proliferation of colon cancer cells in mice [371]. Additionally, in colon cancer cells, 5‐HT production is induced by dimethylhydrazine, which inhibits microvascular formation in the TME and affects mitochondrial function and energy production in cancer cells [372]. In melanoma, 5‐HT can slow tumor growth by inhibiting the production of interleukin (IL)‐10 and interferon (IFN)‐γ and increasing the production of IL‐1β [216, 373]. In non‐small cell lung cancer, SSRIs limit tumor growth and increase tumor sensitivity to erlotinib by inhibiting the adenosine 5‐monophosphate adenosine 5‘‐monophosphate (AMP)‐activated protein kinase (AMPK)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway [220]. Additionally, 5‐HT can modulate immunity, reversing the suppression of antitumor immune responses due to chronic stress [374]. 5‐HT reduces the expression of IL‐4I1 and PD‐L1 and decreases the numbers of inhibitory immune cells, MDSCs, Tregs, and CD39+/PD‐1+ CD8+ T cells. Additionally, the SSRI amitriptyline (AMI) enhances the cytotoxic potential of CD8+ T cells and exerts a synergistic effect with PD‐1 [375]. Furthermore, research has shown that low 5‐HT expression is associated with poor clinical outcomes in prostate cancer patients [376]. Reduced 5‐HT levels promote prostate tumorigenesis and development [376, 377]. 5‐HT reduces glioma cell proliferation and invasion as well as microvessel density while reducing macrophage infiltration [224, 225].
Thus, these reports suggest that the dysregulation of 5‐HT, which is regulated by 5‐HT metabolic enzymes, is involved in tumor growth and immune regulation in the TME. Therefore, reducing intratumoral 5‐HT levels by blocking Tph1 and SERT or promoting MAO‐A expression may be a target for cancer therapy as well as for the design and development of antineoplastic drugs. However, other studies have shown that the aberrant expression of MAO‐A in many cancers promotes tumor progression by reducing tumor 5‐HT levels, which may be related to the heterogeneity of the tumors studied. Therefore, targeting 5‐HT metabolism to regulate tumor 5‐HT levels has become a potential target for the design and development of cancer therapeutic drugs.
5.1.2. Roles of 5‐HTRs in Cancer
5‐HT‐induced 5‐HTR activation can affect the development, recurrence and metastasis of tumors [347]. This section focuses on the relationships between 5‐HTRs and the occurrence, development, and prognosis of tumors. The expression of 5‐HTRs in various cancer tissues is shown in Table 2. The role of 5‐HTRs in cancer is discussed further below.
TABLE 2.
Roles of 5‐HTRs in normal and tumor microenvironments.
| Receptor | Normal vs. tumor | Tumor type | Mechanism | Response | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5‐HT1B/1D/1FR | Colorectal cancer, pancreatic ductal carcinoma | 5‐HT activates 5‐HTRs to initiate Wnt/b‐catenin signaling in order to promote the self‐renewal of colorectal cancer stem cells, integrin/Src/Fak‐mediated signaling, uPAR/MMP‐2 signaling, and zinc finger ZEB1 and Snail protein expression. | Tumor cell proliferation and migration | [360, 378] | |
| 5‐HT1AR | Upregulated in tumors | Lung cancer, lymphoma |
5‐HT activates 5‐HT1AR, and then the 5‐HT1AR/autophagy/p‐STAT3 axis increases the abundance of Tregs and reduces the Th1/Th2 ratio. )5‐HT activates 5‐HT1AR, and then inhibits DNA damage and ROS‐independent caspase activation. |
Tumor cell proliferation, tumor recurrence, and tumor metastasis | [233, 379] |
| 5‐HT1DR | Upregulated in tumors | Hepatocellular carcinoma | 5‐HT1DR activated by 5‐HT inhibits PIK3R1 ubiquitin degradation, thereby increasing FoxO6 expression via the PI3K/Akt pathway. | Increased probability of tumor recurrence | [380] |
| 5‐HT1ER | Upregulated in tumors | Ovarian cancer | 5‐HT1DR activated by 5‐HT inhibits the activation of factors related to SRC | Inhibits tumor cell proliferation and EMT | [236] |
| 5‐HT1BR | Upregulated in tumors | Uterine leiomyoma, colorectal cancer, lymphoma | 5‐HT1BR activated by 5‐HT activates the MAPK/ERK pathway, EF‐2 kinase, the cyclin D1 pathway and α‐smooth muscle antigen; inhibits the caspase pathway; and inhibits apoptosis in tumor cells. | Promotes tumor cell proliferation and tumor metastasis | [131, 233, 235, 326] |
| 5‐HT2BR | Upregulated in tumors | Colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, prostate cancer, uveal melanoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, gastric cancer |
5‐HT2BR activated by 5‐HT activates TGF‐β signaling and promotes ERK phosphorylation, thereby promoting the upregulation of Yap expression. 5‐HT2BR activated by 5‐HT activates Jak/STAT and adhesion kinase; 5‐HT2BR activated by 5‐HT increases the Warburg effect and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling by increasing the protein levels of HIF1 α and Myc. 5‐HT2BR activated by 5‐HT activates the FoxO3a pathway in liver cancer cells |
Inhibits early CAC initiation but promotes late CAC progression Promotes the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of liver cancer, prostate cancer, melanoma, and pancreatic ductal cancer cells Inhibits tumor apoptosis |
[238, 240, 241, 243, 245, 381, 382] |
| 5‐HT2A/2CR | Upregulated in tumors | Colorectal cancer, choriocarcinoma, breast cancer |
5‐HT2A/2CR activated by 5‐HT activates the ERK‐mediated pathways (c‐Jun and Ki67 transcription). 5‐HT2A/2CR activated by 5‐HT activates the STAT3 and ERK1/2 signaling pathways through Jak2. |
Promotes tumor cell proliferation Promotes choriocarcinoma cell growth and survival |
[383, 384] |
| 5‐HT3R | Upregulated in tumors | Pancreatic cancer, neuroblastoma, lung cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, melanoma, gastric cancer | 5‐HT3R activated by 5‐HT inhibits the expression of BAD and Bax and upregulates the expression of Bcl‐2, inhibits cAMP expression, inhibits ERK phosphorylation, and increases intracellular ([Ca2+]i) and causes Ca2+ influx, which in turn causes CaMKIIa phosphorylation and activation, leading to NLRP3 phosphorylation and inflammasome assembly. |
Promotes tumor cell proliferation Promotes metastasis and spread of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma tumor cells |
[123, 352, 385, 386, 382, 387, 388, 389] |
| 5‐HT4R | Upregulated in tumors | Prostate cancer, adrenal cancer, glioblastoma | 5‐HT4R activated by 5‐HT activates the Akt/mTOR pathway, thereby inhibiting cleaved caspase 3 and Bax and promoting Bcl‐2, reduces LC3‐II and Beclin 1 expression. | Promotes tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion | [245, 252] |
| 5‐HT5R | Upregulated in tumors | Breast cancer, glioblastoma, prostate cancer |
5‐HT5R activated by 5‐HT enhances ROS levels and activates the AMPK pathway. Activates the PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis. 5‐HT5R activated by 5‐HT promotes the PKA pathway to increase androgen receptor activation. |
Inhibits glioblastoma cell proliferation and migration Promotes the proliferation of breast and prostate cancer cells |
[162, 254, 390] |
| 5‐HT7R | Upregulated in tumors | Non‐small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, adrenocortical carcinoma, glioblastoma, liver cancer, breast cancer |
5‐HT7R activated by 5‐HT activates the P38 MAPK and NF‐κB signaling pathway and activates the cAMP⁄PKA signaling axis, leading to increased phosphorylation of CREB and ERK⁄Akt. Simultaneously, it activates the kinase signaling pathway and the PI3K/Akt signaling axis. |
Promotes the proliferation, migration, and spread of non‐small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer cells | [256, 258, 260, 391] |
5.1.2.1. 5‐HT2R
5‐HT2R affects tumors [20]. The 5‐HT2R family consists of three subtypes, namely, 5‐HT2AR, 5‐HT2BR, and 5‐HT2CR. 5‐HT2AR expression is significantly upregulated in tumor cells, and 5‐HT2AR enhances proliferation by altering cell cycle progression [108, 392]. 5‐HT2AR activation also promotes skin cancer progression. Furthermore, 5‐HT2AR‐overexpressing mice exhibit a significantly increased incidence of skin cancer, and platelet‐activating factor halts skin cancer progression [393]. Peripheral 5‐HT phosphorylates ERK through 5‐HT2AR, thereby increasing the Yap/vestigial like family member 4 (VGLL4) ratio [394]. The 5‐HT2AR–p‐ERK–Yap axis promotes liver cancer progression [395, 396]. Furthermore, the expression of 5‐HT2BR has been detected in breast cancer and is closely associated with the activation of estrogen receptor‐α [397]. Studies have shown that 5‐HT, through 5‐HT2BR, inhibits autophagy and downregulates the expression and phosphorylation of FoxO3 in HCC cells, thereby promoting the proliferation and growth of these cells [238, 398]. In prostate cancer, 5‐HT2BR expression is upregulated in high‐grade pathological subtypes [245]. Compared with normal pancreatic tissue, 5‐HT2BR is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer tissues and is closely associated with poor clinical prognosis [241, 399]. Previous studies have confirmed the oncogenic role of 5‐HT2BR in pancreatic cancer [241]. In colorectal cancer, the expression of 5‐HT2BR is reduced in early colorectal cancer and promotes tumor growth [381]. Knocking out 5‐HT2BR in late‐stage colorectal cancer inhibits tumor development via tumor cell proliferation and migration [381]. In uveal melanoma, the transcription levels of 5‐HT2BR are significantly elevated, leading to increased intracellular expression of the 5‐HT2BR protein [400]. 5‐HT2BR promotes tumor cell proliferation and migration through the activation of multiple signaling pathways, such as focal adhesion kinase and Jak [243]. Moreover, 5‐HT2BR can promote the nuclear translocation of cAMP response element‐binding protein 1 (CREB1), which further enhances the transcription of zinc finger e‐box binding homoeobox 1 (ZEB1), thereby increasing the migration and promoting the EMT process of colorectal cancer cells [401].
Studies have shown that 5‐HT can be involved in tumor progression via signaling through various subtypes of 5‐HT2Rs [402]. Both 5‐HT2AR and 5‐HT2CR are also expressed in breast cancer cells and tissue samples [403, 404]. Research has shown that 5‐HT can increase oxidative phosphorylation and glycolytic activity in MCF‐7 cells via the 5‐HT2A/2CR signaling pathway, thereby promoting cell proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis [405]. In addition, this signaling pathway activates the transcriptional coactivator PPAR gamma coactivator 1alpha (PGC‐1α), thus promoting mitochondrial biogenesis in MCF‐7 cells [406, 407]. In contrast to other studies, a study by Muller et al. [408] revealed that human cutaneous melanoma cells exhibit high 5‐HT2AR, 5‐HT2BR, and 5‐HT2CR expression. 5‐HT can enhance the inhibition of melanoma cell proliferation induced by radiation, possibly through the release of 5‐HT by mast cells in response to ionizing radiation [408]. These findings suggest that 5‐HT2R plays an important role in tumor progression. Systematic analysis of the regulation of 5‐HT2R expression in various cancers thus has substantial implications for the development of effective targeted drug treatments.
5.1.2.2. 5‐HT3R
Many researchers refer collectively to various subtypes of 5‐HT3R, and studies have also indicated that the selective blockade of 5‐HT3AR has the same effect as the complete blockade of 5‐HT3R activity [118]. Early investigations often combined 5‐HT3R antagonists with other chemotherapeutic drugs to ameliorate the vomiting that is caused by anticancer chemotherapy [409]. In recent years, studies have shown that in addition to reducing vomiting, 5‐HT3R directly affects tumor progression [410]. Clinical data have shown that the expression of the 5HT3AR gene is upregulated in tumor tissue compared with that in tumor margin tissue in patients with breast cancer [411]. The breast cancer cell line MCF‐7 expresses 5‐HTR3AR isoforms [403], and 5‐HT enhances the proliferation of MCF‐7 cells via 5‐HT3AR signaling. The inhibition of 5‐HT3AR with chemical antagonists can reduce the proliferation and induce the apoptosis of MCF‐7 cells [403]. 5‐HT3R is also expressed in human colon cancer cells, and activation of this receptor by 5‐HT promotes mitosis while inhibiting apoptosis [412]. Similarly, 5‐HT3R antagonists inhibit the proliferation of melanoma cells, promote apoptosis and exert a synergistic effect when combined with paclitaxel. In addition, 5‐HT3R antagonists reportedly increase cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels and ERK1/2 phosphorylation and inhibit microtubule formation [120]. Lung adenocarcinoma cells also express 5‐HT3AR, which promotes their proliferation [123]. In colon cancer, 5‐HT3AR is expressed at different levels across several cell lines, including SW1116, HCT116, DLD‐1, LoVo, SW62, and RKO cells, and promotes the proliferation of these cells [413]. Knockdown of 5‐HT3AR causes cell cycle arrest and increases the expression levels of proapoptotic proteins, including Bcl2 associated X protein (Bax), that promote apoptosis [385]. Similarly, both colon cancer tissue and colon cancer cells exhibit high levels of 5‐HT3R expression, and inhibiting 5‐HT3R slows tumor growth [352, 414]. Huang et al. [386] reported that 5‐HT3AR promotes the proliferation and migration of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells, mainly via the long noncoding RNA linc01305, the stability of which is maintained via its interaction with 5‐HT3AR mRNA.
These findings suggest that 5‐HT3R may have significant effects on tumors. Considering that it is the only ion channel receptor among 5‐HTRs, it may play a different role than other receptor subtypes do. The exact role of 5‐HT3R in tumors still needs to be elucidated through large‐scale studies and clinical trials.
5.1.2.3. 5‐HT1R
Various 5‐HT1R isoforms have been studied in tumors, and their expression has been shown to be correlated with cancer progression and prognosis. However, the distribution of 5‐HT1R isoforms in tumors is heterogeneous [415, 416]. 5‐HT1AR and 5‐HT1BR are upregulated in benign and noninvasive tumors but downregulated in invasive tumors [417]. Multiple ovarian cancer cell lines (ES2, OV90, SW626, CaOV3, 2774, TOV112D, UWB1.298, SKOV3, and HEYA8 cells) also overexpress 5‐HT1AR, 5‐HT1BR, and 5‐HT1DR; moreover, two ovarian cancer cell lines (2774 and CaOV3 cell) also express the 5‐HT1ER isoform [417]. In contrast, the expression of 5‐HT1ER is markedly reduced in peritoneally disseminated ovarian cancer cells, and this reduction significantly increases tumor cell proliferation via the activation of Src‐mediated downstream signaling pathways [236]. Siddiqui et al. [418] also measured the expression of 5‐HT1AR and 5‐HT1BR in human bladder cancer tissues and in HT1376 cells. Clinical data also indicate that the 5‐HT1AR subtype is highly expressed in lung cancer tissues from patients with depression [379]. Additionally, 5‐HT1DR has been implicated in lung cancer cell proliferation [419]. Importantly, 5‐HT1AR expression in lung cancer cells is negatively correlated with the activity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) among tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Patients with increased intertumoral 5‐HT1AR expression exhibit increased Treg infiltration and a decreased Th1/Th2 cell ratio, as well as upregulated PD‐L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment (TME) [379].
Additionally, 5‐HT1R has been reported to be associated with liver cancer. 5‐HT levels are elevated in a chemically induced HCC mouse model, and 5‐HT expression levels are correlated with HCC prognosis and progression [420]. In vitro studies have demonstrated that 5‐HT promotes FoxO6 expression via 5‐HT1BR and 5‐HT1DR, thereby increasing liver cancer cell proliferation [380]. Moreover, 5‐HT1BR signaling promotes autophagy and activates Notch signaling by upregulating the expression of light chain 3 (LC3) β and autophagy‐related effector proteins, such as elF4E‐binding protein 1 (4EBP1), autophagy related 3 (ATG3), Beclin1, and s65, thereby inducing liver cancer cell death [421].
In mouse models of colorectal cancer, 5‐HT1DR overexpression has been shown to promote tumor cell invasion [235]. Human HT29 colon cancer cells and uterine leiomyoma cells express high levels of 5‐HT1BR [131, 326]. Furthermore, the 5‐HT1B/1D/1FR isoforms are highly expressed in colorectal cancer stem cells, and the binding of 5‐HT to these receptors promotes self‐renewal, tumor initiation, and migration in these cells [360].
5‐HT1BR and 5‐HT1DR are more highly expressed in pancreatic cancer cells than in normal pancreatic cells [378]. Overexpression of 5‐HT1DR modulates β1 integrin activity, promoting the recruitment of the Src–FAK complex, which enhances cancer cell proliferation and migration. Furthermore, 5‐HT1CR is highly expressed in chordomas in transgenic mice and promotes tumor growth [422].
In summary, these findings indicate that 5‐HT1R promotes the occurrence and development of tumors. Abnormally high expression levels of 5‐HT1R lead to the occurrence and development of various cancers. However, previous research on 5‐HT1Rs has focused mainly on tumor cells themselves. The effects of 5‐HT1R on immune cells, especially the regulatory role of immune cells in the TME, have not been studied thoroughly and require further exploration.
5.1.2.4. 5‐HT4R
Compared with the large number of studies on 5‐HT1, 2, 3R in cancer, relatively few studies have explored the role of 5‐HT4R in tumors [423]. Current evidence indicates that 5‐HT4R is upregulated in various tumor types, including cholangiocarcinoma, colon cancer, and breast cancer, where 5‐HT promotes tumor cell growth and proliferation through 5‐HT4R‐mediated signaling [412]. In addition, 5‐HT4R is upregulated in high‐grade prostate cancer cell lines, such as DU145 and LNCaP [245, 424]. These 5‐HT4R isoforms have been shown to promote tumor cell proliferation even under androgen‐deficient conditions [424]. In the ovary, 5‐HT4R is expressed in both normal tissues and ovarian malignancies. Notably, 5‐HT4R is overexpressed in benign and noninvasive ovarian tumors, whereas its expression is downregulated in more invasive ovarian cancers [417].
In contrast to its tumor‐promoting effects in many cancer types, 5‐HT4R activation has antitumor effects on gliomas. Specifically, 5‐HT4R agonists inhibit the proliferation, migration, and invasion of glioma cells; promote the apoptosis and autophagy of glioma cells; and significantly increase the expression of Beclin1 and LC3‐II [252].
These findings illustrate the role of 5‐HT4R in cancer progression. While its tumor‐promoting effects are evident in several cancers, such as breast, prostate, and colon cancers, 5‐HT4R activation may have inhibitory effects on gliomas. Despite these findings, the mechanisms by which 5‐HT4R functions in tumor cells have not been fully studied and need to be explored.
5.1.2.5. 5‐HT5R and 5‐HT6R
Although the role of 5‐HT4Rs in cancer has been demonstrated in several studies, the roles of 5‐HT5Rs and 5‐HT6Rs in tumors have rarely been studied. Recent studies have shown that a 5‐HT5AR antagonist reduces the frequency of tumor microsphere‐initiating cells among breast cancer cells and synergizes with chemotherapy to inhibit the growth of xenograft tumors by targeting the Gα‐coupling pathway [162]. Additionally, high 5‐HT5AR expression is also observed in prostate cancer. 5‐HT5AR increases androgen receptor activity by activating PKA signaling, which promotes tumor growth [390]. In contrast, although 5‐HT5AR isoforms are expressed in glioma tissues, their levels are lower in glioma cells than in normal brain tissues [254]. Interestingly, the activation of 5‐HT5AR with the agonist valine has been shown to inhibit the proliferation and invasion of glioma cells [254].
Furthermore, 5‐HT6R is expressed in cholangiocarcinoma cells, and 5‐HT promotes their proliferation through 5‐HT6R signaling [215].
These findings suggest that 5‐HT5AR and 5‐HT6R may have significant effects on tumors. However, the role of 5‐HT5R and 5‐HT6R in tumors has not yet been explored in depth. Thus, the mechanisms underlying these processes in tumors are unclear and need further exploration. Furthermore, the potential value of this receptor as a therapeutic target remains unclear.
5.1.2.6. 5‐HT7R
Although the roles of 5‐HT5R and 5‐HT6R in tumor cells have rarely been studied, the role of 5‐HT7R in cancer has been demonstrated in several studies [425]. Multiple glioblastoma cell lines (including U‐373MG, H4, CCF‐STTG1, U‐138MG, Hs683, DBTRG‐05MG, T98G, and U‐87MG) express 5‐HT7R subtypes [426]. In U‐373MG cells, 5‐HT promotes IL‐6 secretion via 5‐HT7R signaling, contributing to tumor progression by fostering a proinflammatory TME [259]. Clinical data have shown that 5‐HT7R mRNA expression in prostate tissue is approximately 200 times greater than that in healthy tissue [257]. Cinar et al. [257] reported that 5‐HT7R mRNA expression is significantly upregulated in PC‐3 prostate cancer cells. 5‐HT promotes the proliferation of tumor cells and inhibits apoptosis by downregulating the expression of caspase3, caspase9, Bax, and tumor protein 53 (TP53) through 5‐HT7R signaling [257]. Similarly, compared with its expression in paratumoral lung tissue, 5‐HT7R is overexpressed in non‐small cell lung cancer tumor tissue [260]. This effect of 5‐HT7R is mediated through activation of the MAPK and Src signaling pathways [260]. Additionally, 5‐HT7R expression is elevated triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. 5‐HT activates Src/ERK through 5‐HT7R signaling, which promotes tumor cell invasion but does not participate in tumor spread [258]. However, 5‐HT7R signaling activates the adenyl cyclase, MAPK, and PI3K/Akt pathways, which inhibit the proliferation of TNBC cells [427].
These findings suggest that blocking 5‐HT7R may have significant potential for treating tumors. However, owing to the lack of highly selective drugs that target 5‐HT7R, implementing this treatment approach is difficult; thus, developing highly selective antagonists has become a potential therapeutic strategy.
Among the various 5‐HTR subtypes, certain receptors have been assigned greater priority for research and therapeutic use because of their critical roles in tumor progression and potential as drug targets. Among them, 5‐HT2Rs have the greatest therapeutic relevance. These receptors are highly expressed in multiple tumor types, and they are involved in regulating cell proliferation, angiogenesis, immune evasion, and even resistance to treatment [20]. The direct roles of 5‐HT3Rs in cancer have not yet been fully elucidated; however, emerging studies suggest that they may influence tumor progression [410]. Clinically, 5‐HT3R antagonists (e.g., ondansetron) are widely used to alleviate chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting [409], and their indications could be expanded into antitumor applications in the future. 5‐HT1AR also represents a high research priority. 5‐HT1AR is involved in regulating the cell cycle, apoptosis, and proliferation‐related signaling in cancers such as HCC [420]. The promigratory function of 5‐HT7Rs in various cancer cells has made these receptors promising targets for future therapeutic intervention [425]. Currently, the development of drugs that target 5‐HT7R is still in its early stages, and further studies are warranted. In summary, on the basis of the current evidence and drug development potential, 5‐HT2R, 5‐HT1AR, and 5‐HT7R represent high‐priority targets in cancer therapy and merit further mechanistic investigation and therapeutic exploration. Although the mechanisms by which 5‐HT3R functions in cancer remain to be clarified, its established clinical use has translational potential. Other 5‐HTR subtypes may also contribute to specific cancer types, but further validation is needed, as most studies remain in the exploratory phase.
5.2. The 5‐HT System and Functional GI Disorders
In addition to its role in tumors, 5‐HT, which functions as an enteric neurotransmitter and a paracrine signaling molecule, plays a vital role in regulating GI motility and secretion. In the gut, 5‐HT is released primarily by EC cells and exerts paracrine effects on nearby target cells, inducing various physiological responses, such as nausea, vomiting, increased intestinal secretion, and enhanced motility. Dysregulation of the 5‐HT system can lead to abnormalities in GI motility and function, potentially resulting in GI disorders such as chronic constipation, IBS, and carcinoid syndrome.
5.2.1. IBD
IBD comprises two chronic inflammatory conditions of the GI tract with unknown etiology and recurrent episodes: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Previous research on the pathogenesis of IBD has focused mainly on immunological and genetic factors; however, studies have also suggested that functional factors are closely involved in its development. Elevated levels of gut‐derived 5‐HT are strongly associated with the onset and progression of IBD [428]. In patients with active IBD, both EC cell numbers and 5‐HT levels are significantly increased [429]. Animal studies have confirmed that abnormalities in the 5‐HT signaling system can lead to the dysregulation of intestinal motility in IBD models [430]. Specifically, the expression of SERT is markedly downregulated in inflamed regions, leading to the local accumulation of 5‐HT, which exacerbates the inflammatory response and is accompanied by an increased number of EC cells [430]. Research has demonstrated that in UC mouse models induced by dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) and CD models induced by trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid, 5‐HT levels are significantly elevated in inflamed colonic tissues [431]. These findings suggest that increased 5‐HT levels may promote inflammatory responses and affect local tissue inflammation, thereby exacerbating colitis [431]. Further studies have shown that reducing 5‐HT expression in the gut can significantly alleviate the severity of colitis in mice, indicating that 5‐HT plays an important regulatory role in the inflammatory process [432]. Moreover, clinical studies have revealed significantly elevated 5‐HT levels in the colonic tissues of UC patients. Experimental interventions involving Lactobacillus have been shown to effectively reduce abnormally elevated 5‐HT levels and relieve inflammation in colonic tissues [433, 434]. Clinical studies have shown that blocking 5‐HT3Rs can effectively alleviate IBS‐D‐like symptoms that are common in patients with quiescent IBD [435]. This effect is achieved by inhibiting the expression of tight junction proteins in intestinal epithelial cells, thereby increasing intestinal mucosal permeability. As a result, microbial translocation and immune cell activation are triggered, further exacerbating the inflammatory response and mucosal damage associated with IBD. In addition, 5‐HT7R antagonists significantly reduce the severity of colonic inflammation and decrease the expression of proinflammatory cytokines in both DSS‐induced colitis and T cell transfer‐induced colitis models [436].
5.2.2. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
5‐HT is a key neurotransmitter that plays a crucial role in regulating GI motility, and it is involved in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The functional response of esophageal smooth muscle is mediated by two main signaling mechanisms: receptor‐dependent and receptor‐independent mechanisms. Among these pathways, the receptor‐dependent pathway includes signal transduction mediated by ACh and 5‐HTRs. In children with aromatic Tph deficiency, the conversion of tryptophan to 5‐HT is impaired, resulting in significantly reduced 5‐HT levels and subsequent esophageal motility disorders; thus, Tph deficiency contributes to the development of GERD [437]. Histological studies have shown that in patients with reflux esophagitis, 5‐HT levels are significantly elevated in diseased tissues, whereas SERT mRNA and 5‐HT4R expression is markedly decreased in both reflux esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease [438]. Further research has demonstrated that inhibition of 5‐HT4R activity can weaken the contraction of the lower esophageal sphincter, thereby increasing the risk of gastric content reflux [439].
Thus, 5‐HT4R agonists may be novel therapeutic options for GERD patients who are unresponsive to proton pump inhibitors. Moreover, selective blockade of specific 5‐HTR subtypes may help reduce intestinal inflammation, indicating potential clinical value in the comprehensive treatment of GERD.
5.2.3. IBS
IBS is among the most common functional GI disorders, it and is characterized primarily by abdominal pain, altered bowel habits, and abnormal stool consistency, with symptoms that are either persistent or intermittently recurrent [440]. In recent years, the understanding of IBS has shifted from a purely biological model to a more integrated biopsychosocial‐genetic model [441]. Among the various mechanisms proposed, abnormalities in the 5‐HT signaling system have emerged as a prominent focus of research worldwide [442].
Previous studies have shown that the mRNA expression of SERT and Tph1 is reduced in IBS patients, leading to impaired 5‐HT reuptake and elevated plasma 5‐HT levels. This increase may contribute to the development of visceral hypersensitivity, which is considered a key mechanism underlying the pathology of IBS [5]. Furthermore, chronic psychological stress can disrupt the gut–brain axis, increasing the number of EC cells in the intestinal mucosa and increasing both the synthesis and release of 5‐HT [443]. Acting through various 5‐HTR subtypes that are located in the myenteric and submucosal plexuses, 5‐HT increases gut sensitivity and worsens IBS symptoms [443]. A study revealed that fasting plasma 5‐HT levels are significantly greater in IBS patients than in healthy controls and that this elevation is positively correlated with the numbers of mast cells and the severity of abdominal pain [444]. These findings suggest that increased 5‐HT release may trigger immune responses in the mucosa, contributing to the sensation of pain. Overall, visceral hypersensitivity is recognized as a core pathophysiological feature of IBS, and elevated 5‐HT levels play a crucial role in its development [444].
Moreover, gut microbiota‐derived metabolites also significantly influence the pathogenesis of IBS [445, 446]. The microbial metabolite acetone can promote 5‐HT release, increase plasma 5‐HT levels, inhibit intestinal water reabsorption, and subsequently cause diarrhea and visceral hypersensitivity [447, 448]. Additionally, short‐chain fatty acids, which are key microbial fermentation products, have been shown to stimulate 5‐HT secretion, increase colonic smooth muscle contraction, and accelerate colonic transit [449]. Studies have also reported that in IBS‐C, probiotic therapy increases intestinal 5‐HT secretion and leads to significant symptom amelioration. Conversely, in IBS‐D, the inhibition of 5‐HT synthesis and release has proven effective in controlling symptoms [450]. These findings suggest that the modulation of 5‐HT signaling could be a potential strategy for the individualized treatment of patients with IBS. Specifically, suppressing 5‐HT synthesis and release is beneficial for IBS‐D patients, whereas increasing 5‐HT levels through probiotics or SSRIs may help alleviate symptoms in IBS‐C patients [450].
At the genetic level, the number of molecular studies on IBS continues to increase. Zhang et al. [451] reported that miRNA‐510 and 5‐HT3ER gene expression is significantly increased in the colonic mucosa of Chinese female IBS‐D patients, suggesting that targeting the expression of these molecules may provide therapeutic benefit. Research has shown that polymorphisms in the SERT gene are closely associated with the development of IBS‐C [452]. In a meta‐analysis, Areeshi et al. [453] confirmed that polymorphisms in the SERT gene SLC6A4 are associated with increased susceptibility to IBS among both American and Asian populations.
5.2.4. Functional Dyspepsia
Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common functional GI disorder. The pathogenesis of FD remains incompletely understood and may involve multiple factors, including GI motility disturbances, visceral hypersensitivity, psychological and social factors, and genetic polymorphisms [454]. Notably, the severity of FD symptoms is not primarily determined by GI pathophysiology, but it is closely associated with psychological factors [455, 456]. Some studies have shown that the S allele of the SERT gene‐linked polymorphic region is significantly associated with the postprandial distress syndrome subtype of FD and is correlated with an increased risk of comorbid psychological symptoms, such as anxiety and depression, in FD patients [457]. However, previous research on FD‐related genetic polymorphisms remains limited, and the genetic mechanisms underlying FD development require further investigation. In recent years, with an increased understanding of the brain–gut axis, SSRIs have gradually been introduced into the clinical management of FD [458, 459]. One study using the SSRI itopride to treat FD patients demonstrated that the drug not only significantly ameliorates dyspeptic symptoms but also effectively alleviates anxiety and depressive states, thereby improving overall quality of life [458]. Nonetheless, SSRIs are also associated with potential risks, including a more than twofold increase in the incidence of GI bleeding, highlighting the need for further large‐scale clinical trials to evaluate their safety profile [460]. FD is also closely associated with chronic psychological stress, which can disrupt brain‒gut axis function and contribute to visceral hypersensitivity [461]. Research suggests that 5‐HT plays a central role in this process by activating specific receptors that regulate neurotransmitter release, increasing GI mucosal and epithelial permeability, and activating pain signaling pathways, ultimately leading to persistent discomfort or pain perception [462]. Abnormal 5‐HT signaling has also been implicated in the pathophysiology of FD. Studies have shown that patients with FD exhibit a significantly attenuated short‐circuit current response to exogenous 5‐HT stimulation. This is accompanied by upregulated expression of 5‐HT3ER and SERT and downregulated expression of 5‐HT7R and Tph1, suggesting the localized dysfunction of mucosal 5‐HT signaling in patients with FD [463]. A recent meta‐analysis indicated that 5‐HTR agonists can significantly alleviate symptoms in FD patients, with an odds ratio (OR) of approximately 2.99; in particular, these agents can improve early satiety and epigastric fullness [464, 465]. Among these agents, 5‐HT4R agonists improve gastric motility, thereby relieving symptoms related to delayed gastric emptying. Furthermore, studies have shown that FD patients exhibit reduced 5‐HT3R activity and increased 5‐HT4R expression in their stomachs, further suggesting a pivotal role of altered 5‐HT signaling in FD pathogenesis and treatment [466, 467, 468].
Therefore, increasing plasma 5‐HT levels and enhancing 5‐HT activity may be effective therapeutic strategies for treating FD. The combined use of 5‐HTR agonists or SSRIs on the basis of conventional treatment represents a novel direction and therapeutic approach for FD. However, the efficacy and safety of this strategy require further validation in high‐quality clinical trials to support its standardized application in routine clinical practice.
5‐HT plays a significant role in the occurrence and development of functional GI disorders. Drugs that target 5‐HT metabolism and 5‐HTRs represent new agents for treating these diseases. With an increased understanding of the mechanism of action of 5‐HT, more precise and personalized treatment plans are expected to be developed in the future.
5.3. The 5‐HT System and Psychiatric Diseases
5‐HTergic neurons regulate a wide range of physiological and behavioral functions and play crucial roles in the onset and progression of various neuropsychiatric disorders [15]. In recent years, in‐depth studies of the serotonergic system, especially its precise mechanisms of action in different brain regions, have increasingly revealed the pivotal role of 5‐HT in mental illnesses [469]. Abnormal 5‐HT signaling is closely associated with numerous neuropsychiatric conditions, including depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders, and obsessive‒compulsive disorder [15]. In these disorders, dysfunction of the 5‐HT system typically involves abnormalities in 5‐HT synthesis and metabolism, imbalances in receptor expression, impaired transporter function, and disruptions in downstream signaling pathways [470, 471].
5.3.1. Depression
The 5‐HT h ypothesis of depression posits that depression is associated with impaired serotonergic neuronal function [472]. Studies have demonstrated that alterations in 5‐HTR and SERT, as well as increased activity of presynaptic autoreceptors, are observed in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) [473, 474]. Moreover, transient depletion of tryptophan in remitted MDD patients can induce a relapse of acute depressive symptoms, further suggesting a critical role of the serotonergic system in depression [475]. SSRIs and other antidepressants exert therapeutic effects by prolonging the half‐life of 5‐HT, thereby alleviating depressive symptoms [14].
Both presynaptic and postsynaptic 5‐HT1ARs are believed to play key roles in the regulation of depression‐like behaviors [476]. Researchers have proposed that selectively targeting 5‐HT1AR and 5‐HT1BR populations through heteroreceptor activation and autoreceptor blockade may contribute to the antidepressant and antipsychotic effects of certain drugs [477]. Some 5‐HT1AR agonists, such as buspirone, have been applied in the clinic to treat depression [478, 479]. Other 5‐HTR subtypes also play important roles in the neurobiology of depression. For example, selective blockade of 5‐HT2AR [480], 5‐HT2CR [481], and 5‐HT3R [482], as well as activation of 5‐HT2BR [483] and 5‐HT4R [484], is considered to have antidepressant potential. Notably, SSRI treatment activates 5‐HT2AR on GABAergic neurons, leading to reduced NE firing [485]. This interaction between 5‐HT2AR and the noradrenergic system may explain the limited efficacy of SSRIs in treatment‐resistant depression [480, 486]. In addition, 5‐HT2CR antagonism has been shown to increase NE and DA levels in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Therefore, the suboptimal therapeutic response of some patients to SSRIs may be partially due to the suppression of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopaminergic activity via the 5‐HT2CR [481]. Furthermore, the antidepressant‐like effects of 5‐HT3R antagonists are thought to be mediated via the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis [487]. Studies also suggest that both agonists and antagonists of 5‐HT6R exert antidepressant‐ and anxiolytic‐like effects in rodent models. However, whether these convergent outcomes occur due to distinct neurochemical effects or to region‐specific brain mechanisms remains unclear. Further research is needed to elucidate the role of 5‐HT6Rs in antidepressant responses. Moreover, blockade of 5‐HT7R has been proposed to be a promising novel and faster‐acting strategy for treating depression. Interestingly, the inhibition of 5‐HT7R has been shown to induce and accelerate antidepressant effects [488]. The microbiota–gut–brain axis is also increasingly being recognized as playing a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of depression [489]. The gut microbiota may help alleviate depressive symptoms by regulating 5‐HT levels [490].
Currently, commonly used antidepressant drugs include tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), SSRIs, and 5‐HT‐NE reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). These medications act by increasing the synaptic concentrations of monoamine neurotransmitters, primarily 5‐HT and NE, and activating corresponding postsynaptic receptors [491]. The long‐term use of antidepressants has also been shown to enhance hippocampal neurogenesis. Among TCAs, drugs such as AMI and imipramine, as well as MAOIs, are widely prescribed owing to their safety and tolerability profiles. Recent evidence suggests that SNRIs may have lower tolerability than SSRIs in some patients with depression. However, clinical observations indicate that tolerability varies considerably between individuals. SSRIs are suitable for long‐term treatment and are considered relatively effective at managing moderate to severe depression in adults [492].
5.3.2. Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder that is characterized by chronic or recurrent episodes of psychosis [493]. The clinical manifestations of schizophrenia include positive symptoms (such as hallucinations and delusions), negative symptoms (such as affective flattening or social withdrawal), and cognitive impairments involving attention, memory, and executive function [494]. There is evidence that neurodevelopmental abnormalities that occur during early brain development may represent key factors in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia [495]. Moreover, dysregulation of various neurotransmitter systems is closely associated with the progression of this disorder. In addition to the classical DA hypothesis, chronic stress mediated by the dorsal raphe (DRN) can lead to hyperactivation of the 5‐HT system, thereby disrupting neuronal activity in the cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and dorsolateral PFC [496]. In addition to changes in 5‐HT activity, postmortem and in vivo studies of patients with schizophrenia have revealed changes in the expression of 5‐HTR and SERT, with most studies focused on the roles of 5‐HT1AR and 5‐HT2AR. However, findings about the role of 5‐HT1AR in schizophrenia remain inconsistent. A meta‐analysis revealed significantly increased 5‐HT1AR density in the PFC of patients with schizophrenia [497], whereas another study reported no significant difference in immunoreactivity between patients and healthy controls [498]; these findings indicate that the role of 5‐HT1AR in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia remains under debate. In contrast, the role of 5‐HT2AR in the pathology of schizophrenia has been extensively documented [295]. Studies have demonstrated significantly reduced 5‐HT2AR binding potential in the PFC of patients with schizophrenia compared with that in healthy individuals, suggesting that downregulation or decreased activity of 5‐HT2AR may contribute to this disorder [499]. These receptors regulate DA release in the nigrostriatal pathway; the administration of 5‐HT2AR, such as olanzapine and risperidone, can increase striatal DA release by blocking the inhibitory effect of 5‐HT [500, 501]. Moreover, excessive activation of 5‐HT2AR may increase the release of glutamate in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), which activates the mesolimbic pathway and leads to excessive DA levels in the ventral striatum [502]. Selective 5‐HT2AR antagonists have largely failed as monotherapies for schizophrenia, whereas multitarget antagonists with greater affinity for 5‐HT2AR than DA for D2R have proven more effective [503].
5‐HT3R and 5‐HT6R have emerged as promising therapeutic targets for the development of antipsychotic agents, especially for ameliorating the cognitive deficits that are associated with schizophrenia [504, 505, 506]. Studies have shown that the 5‐HT3R antagonist ondansetron, when used as an adjunctive treatment, can alleviate symptoms in patients with treatment‐resistant disease and enhance visual memory performance [506, 507]. In addition, preclinical studies have demonstrated that blockade of 5‐HT5Rs may have beneficial effects on negative symptoms and cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia [508]. 5‐HT7R, which has high affinity for several antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs, has also been identified as a potential target [324]. Postmortem studies have revealed reduced expression of 5‐HT7R in the PFC of patients with schizophrenia, and polymorphisms in the 5‐HT7R gene are significantly associated with this disorder [509]. Blockade of 5‐HT7R may help alleviate the negative symptoms of schizophrenia and has been shown to ameliorate ketamine‐induced social withdrawal behavior in mice [510].
Research has indicated that SERT density is not significantly decreased in patients with schizophrenia [511, 512]. These findings suggest that SERT may play a limited role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.
In summary, accumulating evidence suggests the presence of serotonergic dysfunction in individuals with depression and schizophrenia. However, further research is needed to develop 5‐HT‐based pharmacotherapies that specifically target the mechanisms underlying this disorder.
5.4. The 5‐HT System and Hepatobiliary Diseases
5‐HT not only regulates mental disorders in the CNS but also plays an important role in the periphery. In recent years, the role of 5‐HT in various pathological and physiological processes of the liver, as well as its underlying mechanisms, has attracted significant attention. 5‐HT plays a role in promoting liver regeneration and is closely associated with liver diseases such as viral hepatitis, liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), primary liver tumors, liver ischemia‒reperfusion injury, and chronic cholestasis [380, 513].
5.4.1. Liver Regeneration
5‐HT not only functions as a neurotransmitter in the nervous system but also promotes cell mitosis and participates in tissue remodeling. Multiple studies have shown that 5‐HT plays an important regulatory role in hepatocyte proliferation during liver regeneration [514, 515, 516]. Platelets are the primary carriers of 5‐HT in the bloodstream, and they transport it to various organs. In a mouse model of liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy (PH), a reduction in platelet count or inhibition of platelet activity significantly suppresses hepatocyte proliferation [516, 517]. In Tph1−/− mice, which lack peripheral 5‐HT, hepatocyte proliferation is markedly reduced. After PH, Tph1−/− mice exhibit impaired liver regeneration and more severe liver injury, which are accompanied by significant upregulation of the transcriptional regulator Yap [518]. The inhibition of Yap expression significantly diminishes the proliferative effect mediated by 5‐HT, suggesting that 5‐HT promotes liver regeneration by regulating Yap expression [518, 519]. In addition, 5‐HTRs plays crucial roles in this process. In the livers of mice subjected to PH, the mRNA expression levels of 5‐HT2AR and 5‐HT2BR increase, which contributes to liver regeneration [520]. The underlying mechanism involves the IL‐33/growth stimulation expressed gene 2 (ST2) pathway‐mediated release of gut‐derived 5‐HT into the bloodstream, which subsequently activates the 5‐HT2AR/p70S6K signaling pathway in hepatocytes [521]. Further research indicated that 5‐HT2R may act as a cofactor in DNA synthesis, enhancing hepatocyte proliferation by promoting the G1/S phase cell cycle transition. Moreover, the 5‐HT7R receptor is involved in hepatocyte mitosis and plays a role in liver regeneration [256]. In animals subjected to PH, elevated 5‐HT levels in the brainstem and cerebral cortex, along with the upregulation of 5‐HT2CR receptors, suggest that this pathway may indirectly promote hepatocyte proliferation by stimulating sympathetic nerve activity [522].
5.4.2. Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis
Activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) is a key step in the initiation and progression of liver fibrosis. 5‐HT regulates the activation, proliferation, and apoptosis of HSCs by binding to various receptors that are expressed on their surface, thereby influencing the fibrotic process. Multiple 5‐HTR subtypes are upregulated in activated HSCs and are predominantly distributed within fibrotic tissues [523]. Among these receptors, 5‐HT2AR plays a critical role in HSC‐mediated fibrosis [524]. In vitro experiments have indicated that activation of 5‐HT2AR can stimulate the Smad signaling pathway, leading to changes in the expression of fibrosis‐related markers, such as α‐smooth muscle actin (α‐SMA) and collagen [102, 524]. Additionally, 5‐HT can activate the ERK and JunD signaling pathways via 5‐HT2BR, upregulate TGF‐β1 expression, and synergize with PDGF signaling to promote HSC activation [525, 526]. 5‐HT2R antagonists significantly inhibit HSC proliferation and induce apoptosis while downregulating the expression of key fibrogenic proteins, including TGF‐β1, PKC, p‐Smad3, and p‐ERK1/2, in liver tissue, thus effectively alleviating liver fibrosis [527]. Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that 5‐HT7R may have opposing effects on HSC function. Ruddell et al. [528] reported a marked reduction in 5‐HT7R mRNA expression in activated rat HSCs. Similarly, Polat et al. [529] reported decreased hepatic expression of 5‐HT7R in a CCl4‐induced mouse model of cirrhosis. Activation of 5‐HTRs attenuates liver fibrosis and cirrhosis and slows HCC progression [529]. Notably, HSCs also express SERT, which allows them to actively take up and release 5‐HT, forming an autocrine/paracrine regulatory loop that helps maintain the local stability and persistence of 5‐HT signaling [528].
In summary, 5‐HT may play dual roles in the development of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis through different receptor subtypes. On the one hand, 5‐HT promotes HSC activation and proliferation via 5‐HT2R, thereby facilitating fibrogenesis; on the other hand, 5‐HT may exert antifibrotic effects through 5‐HT7R. The differential expression patterns and regulatory mechanisms of various 5‐HTRs in distinct hepatic cell populations during the progression of fibrosis warrant further investigation.
5.4.3. NASH
5‐HT plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of NASH [530]. 5‐HT levels are significantly elevated in both the peripheral blood and portal veins of NASH patients, suggesting a close association with disease onset [531]. Research has indicated that MAO‐A expression is upregulated in patients with NASH [531]. In methionine–choline‐deficient diet‐induced animal models of NASH, 5‐HT is metabolized by MAO‐A in mitochondria, leading to the production of large amounts of ROS and lipid peroxides [532]. This oxidative stress results in mitochondrial dysfunction and triggers inflammatory responses, thereby exacerbating hepatocellular injury and the pathological progression of NASH [532]. Moreover, inhibition of MAO‐A activity in wild‐type mice alleviates liver damage. Although Tph1−/− mice exhibit levels of hepatic steatosis that are similar to those in wild‐type controls, impaired peripheral 5‐HT synthesis in these mice leads to reduced ROS production and milder hepatocellular injury, consequently attenuating liver inflammation [533]. In addition, 5‐HT contributes to NASH progression by activating 5‐HT2AR on hepatocyte membranes, thereby disrupting lipid metabolism and promoting hepatic fat accumulation and inflammatory responses [534]. The underlying mechanisms involve the upregulation of peroxisome proliferators‐activated receptors (PPARs) γ2 and lipogenesis‐related genes, such as factor‐related apoptosis (Fas), Cd36, and Perilpin2, which increase lipid synthesis and deposition [535]. Studies have demonstrated that hepatosteatosis is significantly reduced in intestinal‐specific Tph1−/− mice and liver‐specific 5‐HT2AR−/− mice that are fed a high‐fat diet (HFD); these results suggest that inhibiting gut‐derived 5‐HT synthesis or blocking hepatic 5‐HT2AR signaling can ameliorate lipid metabolism disorders [536]. Furthermore, 5‐HT2AR antagonists can prevent HFD‐induced hepatic steatosis [537], and the combined use of 5‐HT synthesis inhibitors and 5‐HT2R antagonists markedly reduces hepatic steatosis and inflammation in mouse models of diabetes [535, 538]. Moreover, studies have revealed that 5‐HT4R expression in both liver and adipose tissue significantly decreases after HFD intervention in mice. Blocking 5‐HT4R not only mitigates hepatic steatosis but also reduces adipose tissue mass and suppresses proinflammatory cytokine expression and inflammasome complex formation, highlighting a potential anti‐inflammatory and metabolic regulatory effect [539].
In addition to its direct hepatic effects, 5‐HT plays an essential role in modulating intestinal barrier function. 5‐HT3R regulates the expression of tight junction proteins such as claudin‐1 (CLDN1) and occludin in intestinal epithelial cells. Disruption of 5‐HT3R activity increases gut permeability, allowing LPS to enter the liver, where it activates immune responses and accelerates the transition from NAFLD to NASH [540]. Additionally, the gut microbiota participates in the pathogenesis of NASH by regulating the levels of 5‐HT and its metabolites. Gut bacteria can influence 5‐HT synthesis by metabolizing tryptophan and modulating the inflammatory status of the gut–liver axis, thereby indirectly affecting hepatic lipid accumulation and inflammation, which further exacerbates the progression of NASH [541].
In conclusion, 5‐HT is involved in various aspects of NASH pathology, including lipid metabolism dysregulation, oxidative stress, inflammatory activation, and disruption of the gut–liver barrier, via multiple targets and signaling pathways. These multifaceted mechanisms reveal novel targets and strategies for NASH treatment. Future interventions that focus on the comprehensive regulation of 5‐HT synthesis, metabolism, and receptor signaling may offer promising directions for the effective treatment of NASH.
5.4.4. Viral Hepatitis
Clinical studies have shown that serum 5‐HT levels in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who are receiving interferon antiviral therapy can serve as a predictor of treatment efficacy [542]. Patients with higher 5‐HT levels tend to respond better to interferon treatment, suggesting that 5‐HT may be closely associated with the onset and progression of viral hepatitis [543]. In mouse models of viral hepatitis, the number of activated platelets in the liver is significantly increased [544]. These platelets release 5‐HT, which can reduce hepatic blood flow, impair the recruitment of CD8+ T cells that are needed for viral clearance, and thus exacerbate liver injury. In contrast, Tph1−/− mice, which lack the ability to synthesize 5‐HT in the periphery, exhibit significantly reduced liver damage; these results further suggest a pathogenic role of 5‐HT in viral hepatitis [545]. Additionally, studies have shown that SSRIs, such as fluoxetine, can effectively inhibit platelet uptake of 5‐HT, thereby reducing circulating 5‐HT levels. This phenomenon improves hepatic microcirculation, enhances CD8+ T cell recruitment, and accelerates hepatitis viral clearance [545]. Clinical observations have also shown that SSRIs can reduce the risk of HCC in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in a dose‐dependent manner [546]. Moreover, in vitro studies involving HCV‐infected hepatocyte cultures have suggested that 5‐HTR activation participates in the viral entry process. Specifically, the activation of 5‐HT2AR enhances the membrane localization of CLDN1, which is a key tight junction protein, thereby promoting endocytosis and facilitating HCV entry into cells [542].
In conclusion, 5‐HT plays a crucial role in the occurrence and progression of various liver diseases. Modulating the level of 5‐HT or blocking signaling pathways mediated by its receptors may provide new therapeutic approaches and potential therapeutic targets for liver diseases.
5.5. The 5‐HT System and Diabetes
5‐HT, which is a key neurotransmitter, also plays a widespread role in regulating energy metabolism, particularly in the maintenance of glucose homeostasis, in which it performs dual functions. On the one hand, some studies have reported that 5‐HT can increase blood glucose levels and promote insulin resistance; on the other hand, evidence suggests that 5‐HT can stimulate insulin secretion, increase insulin sensitivity, and ameliorate metabolic disorders.
The hyperglycemic effect of 5‐HT is likely mediated by 5‐HT2R. Gut‐derived 5‐HT can act on 5‐HT2BR in hepatocytes, thereby promoting gluconeogenesis [547, 548]. Blocking 5‐HT2BR improves glucose metabolism and facilitates the restoration of normoglycemia [549, 550]. When 5‐HT binds to 5‐HT2R, it induces serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate‐1, reduces its activity, and promotes its ubiquitin‐mediated degradation, thereby disrupting insulin signaling pathways [551]. On the basis of these mechanisms, 5‐HT2R antagonists have been explored in the clinic as potential treatments for type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome.
Recent studies have also revealed the hypoglycemic effects of 5‐HT. Animal experiments have shown that 5‐HT increases serum insulin levels, reduces plasma glucose concentrations, improves glucose tolerance and lipid metabolism in mice with type 2 diabetes, and reduces body weight in a dose‐dependent manner [552]. Additionally, 5‐HT activates 5‐HT7R in the adrenal gland, promoting the release of β‐endorphin, which in turn activates opioid receptors, enhances peripheral glucose uptake and utilization, and significantly decreases blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes models [553]. Clinical studies have shown that 5‐HT4R agonists also exert glucose‐lowering effects, primarily by increasing insulin sensitivity [554]. Furthermore, 5‐HT activates 5‐HT2A/2CR, increasing the membrane expression of glucose transporters (e.g., GLUT4) and thereby promoting glucose uptake by cardiomyocytes [555]. In addition, Tph1−/− mice, which lack peripheral 5‐HT, exhibit reduced insulin secretion and elevated blood glucose levels, highlighting the crucial role of 5‐HT in pancreatic islet function [556].
In addition to insulin signaling, 5‐HT plays important roles in regulating insulin secretion and β‐cell growth. 5‐HT is stored along with insulin in pancreatic β‐cell granules, and it is released simultaneously in response to glucose stimulation. Studies suggest that intracellular 5‐HT can regulate the fusion of insulin‐containing vesicles with the cell membrane through serotonylation, thus facilitating insulin secretion [551]. Extracellular 5‐HT can regulate insulin release via the activation of 5‐HT1AR. Additionally, 5‐HT may act in an autocrine or paracrine manner to activate 5‐HT2BR, thus promoting β‐cell proliferation [557]. 5‐HT also suppresses the expression of α‐cell markers (such as Arx and Gcg) while increasing β‐cell marker expression in murine α‐cell lines, suggesting its potential to induce α‐to‐β‐cell phenotype conversion [558].
In addition to its direct effects on glucose metabolism, 5‐HT is involved in the regulation of diabetic complications. Peripheral 5‐HT5AR has been shown to play a significant role in inhibiting cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in rats with type 1 diabetes [559]. The 5‐HT1AR agonist NLX‐112 has been shown to ameliorate urinary dysfunction in rats with diabetes, and this mechanism is likely associated with the upregulation of 5‐HTR expression in the L6–S1 spinal dorsal lateral nucleus [560]. Treatment with a 5‐HT2BR agonist has been shown to improve colonic migrating motor complex activity in males with diabetes and enhance colonic transit in ovariectomized female patients with diabetes [561]. In type 1 diabetes models, the downregulation of presynaptic 5‐HT1AR enhances spinal 5‐HT release, reduces quinolinic acid levels, inhibits tryptophan 2,3‐dioxygenase (Tdo), indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase (Ido) 1, and Ido2 expression, and improves neuronal degeneration and pain‐related behaviors [562]. Furthermore, the contractile response of the pancreatic and mesenteric arteries to 5‐HT is significantly reduced in mice with diabetes, possibly due to decreased 5‐HTR activity and increased eNOS activation, leading to elevated nitric oxide release and reduced vascular tone [563].
In summary, the 5‐HT signaling pathway, which is a complex and highly tunable biological network, includes factors that are emerging as therapeutic targets for a wide range of systemic diseases. Future research should continue to integrate multiomics data, drug screening platforms, and clinical validation to advance the development of 5‐HT‐related therapies toward precision medicine, combination treatments, and targeted delivery, thereby promoting translational advancements in disease management.
6. Role of 5‐HT in Tumor Immunity
In addition to its role in a variety of diseases that have been widely reported or applied in clinical treatment, an increasing number of studies in recent years have focused on the function of 5‐HT in immune regulation. Owing to its multifaceted effects on immune cells, the 5‐HT signaling axis represents a promising direction for research on tumor immunity (Figure 5 and Table 3).
FIGURE 5.

Role of serotonin (5‐HT) signaling in tumor immunity and mechanistic cross‐talk between 5‐HT signaling and immune checkpoints. 5‐HT acts on 5‐HT receptors (5‐HTRs) on the surfaces of immune cells, promotes dendritic cell (DC) maturation, stimulates T‐cell activation, increases NK cell cytotoxicity, promotes B‐cell maturation, and stimulates macrophage polarization toward the M2 phenotype.
TABLE 3.
Roles of 5‐HT in tumor immunity.
| Receptor | Cell type | Mechanism | Effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5‐HT1AR | T cells, B cells, NK cells |
|
|
[564, 565, 566] |
| 5‐HT1BR | DCs |
|
DC migration | [301] |
| 5‐HT1E/1FR | DCs | 5‐HT induces a 5‐HTR‐dependent intracellular Ca2+ spike in immature DCs. | DC migration | [301] |
| 5‐HT2R | DCs, T cells, TAMs |
|
|
[242, 301, 302] |
| 5‐HT3R | DCs, T cells |
|
|
[301] |
| 5‐HT4R | DCs | 5‐HT activates 5‐HTR to induce an increase in cAMP levels in mature DCs, increase the release of the cytokines IL‐1β and IL‐8, and reduce the secretion of IL‐12 and TNF‐α. | DC maturation | [301] |
| 5‐HT1/4/7R | DCs | 5‐HT binds to 5‐HTR in DCs cells to promote the production of the pro‐inflammatory cytokine IL‐6, inhibit the production of the chemokine IP‐10/CXCL10, increase the secretion of CCL22/MDC, and promote the transformation of mature DCs into high IL‐10 and low IL‐12/p70 secretion phenotypes. | Cytokine release from DCs | [567] |
| 5‐HT7R | DCs, T cells, TAMs |
|
|
[242, 341, 568] |
6.1. 5‐HT‐Mediated Regulation of Tumor‐Infiltrating Immune Cells
A variety of 5‐HTRs are expressed on the surfaces of immune cells [569]. 5‐HT interacts directly with distinct 5‐HTRs on immune cells that can profoundly influence the ability of the immune system to target and eliminate tumors.
6.1.1. Macrophages
Macrophages, particularly TAMs, are critical targets of 5‐HT signaling within the TME. Macrophages play pivotal roles in modulating inflammation, tissue remodeling, and immune surveillance [570, 571, 572]. Emerging evidence indicates that 5‐HT can influence macrophage polarization and cytokine production, thereby shaping the immune landscape in ways that either support or hinder tumor development.
5‐HT binds to 5‐HTR on the surfaces of monocytes and macrophages, promoting the polarization of TAMs toward the M2 phenotype and regulating their cytokine secretion [573]. Nocito et al. [162] reported that 5‐HT also reduces the expression of MMP12 in TAMs and promotes tumor progression in mice with colon cancer. MMP12 cleaves plasminogen to generate the angiogenesis inhibitor angiostatin, exerting an antiangiogenic effect. However, it has been reported that macrophages respond to stimulation with 5‐HT at different concentrations. Low levels of 5‐HT promote the production of IL‐6 and TNF‐α by macrophages and T cells through 5‐HT2R, whereas high concentrations of 5‐HT inhibit the secretion of IL‐6 and TNF‐α, thereby inducing T cells to differentiate into immunosuppressive or nonfunctional types [242, 302].
6.1.2. DCs
In addition to its effects on macrophages, 5‐HT also exerts a significant regulatory effect on DCs, which serve as key antigen‐presenting cells that bridge innate and adaptive immunity. By modulating the phenotype and cytokine profile of DCs, 5‐HT can indirectly shape T‐cell responses and thereby influence tumor progression.
5‐HT signaling promotes the maturation and chemotaxis of bone marrow‐derived DCs [574]. 5‐HT promotes the development of anti‐inflammatory DCs, which in turn may lead to the polarization of Tregs [575]. Tregs often suppress cytotoxic T‐cell activity, thereby promoting tumor development [576]. 5‐HT binds to 5‐HTR on DCs, induces changes in the DC phenotype, decreases the expression of costimulatory molecules and CD1a, increases the expression of CD14, and significantly decreases the stimulating activity of allogeneic T cells [568]. Idzko et al. [301] reported differences in the expression of 5‐HTR on DCs at different stages; immature DCs preferentially express 5‐HT1BR, 5‐HT1ER and 5‐HT2BR, whereas mature DCs mainly express 5‐HT4R and 5‐HT7R. The activation of different types of receptors induces different functions in DCs. 5‐HT1R and 5‐HT2R stimulation induces intracellular Ca2+ mobilization via the Gi/o protein in immature DCs. 5‐HT4R and 5‐HT7R induce elevated cAMP levels in mature DCs. In addition, 5‐HT4R and 5‐HT7R increase the release of IL‐1β and IL‐8 while decreasing the secretion of IL‐12 and TNF‐α by mature DCs [301].
6.1.3. T Cells
T cells play a direct role in inhibiting and killing tumors [577, 578, 579, 580]. Recent research has highlighted the complex and sometimes contradictory roles of 5‐HT in modulating antitumor immunity, particularly through its influence on the behavior of T cells in the TME. On the one hand, 5‐HT has been shown to inhibit T‐cell function; on the other hand, under certain conditions, it may enhance T cell‐mediated immune responses.
5‐HT can inhibit the proliferation and activity of cytotoxic T cells through 5‐HT5AR and 5‐HT7R [581]. The activation of 5‐HT3Rs on the surface of T cells by 5‐HT can significantly suppress the CXCL12‐mediated migration of CD4+ T cells, indicating that increased 5‐HT levels may prevent the recruitment of T lymphocytes to tumor tissues [341]. The expression of 5HT2A/2BR in breast cancer patients is positively correlated with the invasion of CD8+ T cells. In zebrafish and mouse models, 5HT2AR activation promotes CD8+ T‐cell proliferation and inhibits breast cancer invasion and metastasis [582]. CD8+ T cells accumulate 5‐HT intracellularly to promote the formation of 5‐HT from GAPDH, thereby promoting the glycolytic metabolism and antitumor immune activity of CD8+ T cells [583]. In addition, treatment of chronically stressed mice with 5‐HT reduces the infiltration of CD8+ T cells into the TME, and the expression of IFN‐γ and granzyme B in CD8+ T cells is also reduced, whereas the expression of PD‐1on CD8+ T cells is increased [584]. Other groups have reported that 5‐HT increases PD‐L1 expression by tumor cells in vitro through serotonylation. Moreover, serum 5‐HT concentrations in patients with abdominal tumor metastases are negatively correlated with the number of tumor‐infiltrating CD8+ T cells. 5‐HT depletion suppresses the growth of syngeneic pancreatic and colorectal tumors in wild‐type mice, increases CD8+ T cell influx, and reduces PD‐L1 expression [212].
6.1.4. Other Cells
5‐HT can increase the cytotoxic potential of NK cells [564, 585]. 5‐HT also regulates the mitogen‐stimulated proliferation of mature B cells [565]. However, the detailed mechanisms by which 5‐HT affects various immune cells via downstream signaling pathways have not been elucidated. In the future, the use of various drugs with the potential to regulate 5‐HT signaling may play a key role in modulating tumor immunity.
6.2. 5‐HT‐Mediated Tumor Immunotherapy
Studies have shown that 5‐HT can upregulate PD‐L1 expression on the surface of tumor cells, thereby significantly reducing the infiltration of CD8+ T cells into the TME and weakening the antitumor immune response. Experimental results demonstrate that eliminating 5‐HT or blocking 5‐HT signaling leads to a reduction in PD‐L1 levels on tumor cells, increased T‐cell infiltration, and slower tumor progression; these results suggest that antidepressants (e.g., SSRIs) in combination with PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors may exert synergistic antitumor effects [212]. In addition, MAOIs can act as immune modulators. Studies have shown that MAO‐A is overexpressed in tumor‐associated immune cells and that its genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition (e.g., with phenelzine) can significantly increase the antitumor activity of CD8+ T cells. In murine tumor models, MAO‐A knockout or inhibition not only markedly suppresses tumor growth but also exhibits synergistic efficacy when combined with anti‐PD‐1 therapy [226]. In the context of CAR T‐cell immunotherapy, which is a novel T cell‐based therapy that involves Tph1‐engineered CAR T cells that can endogenously synthesize 5‐HT, has been developed. These modified cells significantly enhance CD8+ T‐cell activation and endoplasmic function. While traditional CAR T cells reduce tumor volume by approximately 32% on day 23, Tph1‐CAR T cells achieve a tumor reduction of approximately 78%, indicating markedly stronger antitumor activity [583]. Furthermore, recent studies in animal models revealed that SSRIs significantly enhance CD8+ T‐cell function in various tumor models, including melanoma, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and colorectal cancer models, leading to greater than 50% tumor growth inhibition. More importantly, when combined with PD‐1/PD‐L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors, this treatment resulted in complete tumor regression in all experimental animals, further highlighting the promising clinical translation potential of targeting the 5‐HT signaling pathway [586].
In summary, 5‐HT plays a crucial role in regulating tumor‐infiltrating immune cells, and its signaling axis has emerged as a novel target for tumor immunotherapy. Future studies should focus on elucidating the mechanisms by which different receptor subtypes regulate immune cells and validating their therapeutic potential across various tumor models and clinical settings.
7. The Potential of 5‐HT for Use as a Biomarker of Disease
5‐HT, also known as serotonin, is a crucial neurotransmitter, hormone, and paracrine signaling molecule [587, 588]. While it is best known for its role in mood regulation, cognitive function, and GI motility, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that changes in 5‐HT levels, metabolic pathways, and receptor expression are closely associated with various pathological conditions [39]. As such, interest in the potential of 5‐HT for use as a biomarker of a wide range of diseases, particularly psychiatric disorders, inflammatory conditions, cancer, and metabolic syndromes, is increasing [589].
Decreased 5‐HT signaling in the CNS is considered a key mechanism underlying depressive symptoms [590]. 5‐HT levels, such as those in plasma or platelets, have been used as dynamic indicators for evaluating depressive states [591]. Some studies have reported significantly lower levels of 5‐HT in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with depression than in that of healthy individuals, suggesting the potential of 5‐HT levels to be used as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker [592]. However, findings on the effects of antidepressant treatment on peripheral 5‐HT levels remain inconsistent. A meta‐analysis of 15 clinical trials and 11 animal studies revealed that peripheral 5‐HT levels may increase, decrease, or remain unchanged after pharmacological intervention [593, 594]. This high degree of variability currently limits the reliability of peripheral 5‐HT levels as a stable biomarker for diagnosing depression or evaluating therapeutic efficacy.
5‐HT plays a critical role in GI motility, secretion, and local immune regulation [595]. Studies have shown that elevated 5‐HT levels in the GI mucosa or peripheral blood are strongly associated with conditions such as IBS, IBD, and carcinoid syndrome [596]. In patients with CD, serum 5‐HT levels are significantly elevated during phases of active disease [597, 598]. Moreover, serum 5‐HT levels outperform traditional inflammatory markers, such as C‐reactive protein and circulating cytokine levels, in distinguishing active versus refractory or remissive disease states [599]. Thus, the serum 5‐HT level is considered an effective biomarker for disease stratification and treatment guidance in patients with CD [600]. Additionally, 5‐HT is involved in platelet aggregation and vasoconstriction, indicating its potential clinical relevance in cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, and myocardial infarction [601, 602, 603].
A growing body of evidence highlights the role of 5‐HT in tumor biology [604]. In addition to supporting tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis, 5‐HT may promote immune evasion and metastasis. In solid tumors such as colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers, the overexpression of 5‐HTRs (e.g., 5‐HT2AR and 5‐HT2BR) and increased SERT levels have been correlated with tumor progression, stage, and prognosis [604, 605, 606]. Dynamic changes in the 5‐HT levels in blood and tumor tissues may serve as indicators for monitoring therapeutic response and recurrence risk [606]. In patients with carcinoid syndrome, urinary 5‐HIAA, which is an end metabolite of 5‐HT, has already become a clinically established biomarker for assessing tumor burden and monitoring treatment efficacy [607].
5‐HT also plays a pivotal role in modulating the immune system. Studies have shown that 5‐HT influences the functions of DCs, macrophages, and T and B lymphocytes [608]. In autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis, abnormal expression of 5‐HTRs on immune cells may affect disease progression, suggesting the potential of these receptors to be used as supplementary biomarkers for monitoring disease activity [609, 610]. In the context of metabolic disorders, particularly type 2 diabetes and obesity, 5‐HT has been shown to regulate glucose metabolism, insulin sensitivity, and adipose tissue inflammation [611]. Studies have shown that changes in 5‐HT levels or disruptions in its metabolic pathway are associated with insulin resistance and chronic inflammation in adipose tissue, indicating that 5‐HT can be used as a potential biomarker for the early diagnosis of diabetic complications and related disorders [611].
Overall, the widespread involvement of 5‐HT and its signaling pathways across numerous physiological and pathological processes highlights its tremendous potential in biomarker development. Through direct measurement (e.g., serum or CSF levels of 5‐HT and 5‐HIAA), functional imaging (e.g., PET scans of SERT distribution), or functional assessment (e.g., receptor sensitivity and transporter expression), 5‐HT‐related indicators hold promise for early disease screening, disease progression monitoring, therapeutic response prediction, and the development of personalized treatment strategies [612]. However, the expression of 5‐HT is influenced by various factors, such as age, sex, diet, circadian rhythms, and methodological differences in sample collection and analysis. Therefore, further large‐scale and standardized studies are needed to optimize its clinical application.
8. Conclusion and Prospects
This review provides a comprehensive overview of the 5‐HT system, emphasizing 5‐HT metabolic pathways, 5‐HT receptor‐mediated signaling mechanisms, and the complex and widespread roles of 5‐HT across various physiological and pathological contexts. 5‐HT has multiple biological effects on emotional regulation, GI homeostasis, and immune modulation, and it is also involved in the development and progression of numerous diseases, including psychiatric disorders, metabolic syndrome, inflammatory conditions, and cancer [17, 18, 19]. In recent years, aberrant 5‐HT signaling has been increasingly recognized as a key feature of various pathologies, particularly neuroinflammation, tumor immune evasion, and vascular dysfunction [589]. While several therapeutic agents that target the 5‐HT system, such as SSRIs, MAOIs, and receptor‐specific antagonists, have been successfully applied in clinical practice [221, 279, 290], their broader implementation is hindered by limited target selectivity, systemic complexity, and frequent adverse effects.
Several fundamental scientific questions remain unresolved. The mechanisms by which 5‐HT regulates immune cell functions, such as macrophage polarization and T‐cell activation, within the tumor immune microenvironment remain poorly defined, and the causal relationships between 5‐HT signaling and immune activation or suppression require further clarification. Additionally, the interplay between 5‐HTRs and key signaling pathways (e.g., Wnt/β‐catenin and PD‐1/PD‐L1) is a potential basis for the dual tumor‐promoting and tumor‐inhibiting effects of 5‐HT, and this interplay warrants systematic investigation. Moreover, the influence of the gut microbiota on peripheral 5‐HT synthesis and metabolism has emerged as a novel research topic [613]. Increasing evidence suggests that microbial metabolites can modulate tryptophan metabolism in the gut, thereby regulating EC cell‐derived 5‐HT production, which in turn affects host neuroendocrine and immune homeostasis through the gut–brain–immune axis [614]. Thus, microbially mediated regulation of 5‐HT metabolism may act as a mechanistic link in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases and mood disorders.
Although preclinical studies have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of targeting 5‐HT pathways, significant barriers remain in translating these findings into clinical applications. On the one hand, the bidirectional role of 5‐HT in different disease contexts, especially in cancer, poses considerable challenges for drug design. On the other hand, currently available pharmacological agents lack receptor subtype selectivity and tissue specificity, which results in systemic side effects. The development of highly selective receptor modulators represents a promising direction for enhancing therapeutic specificity and minimizing off‐target effects. Immunometabolic combination strategies should also be prioritized, including the use of SSRIs to increase CD8+ T‐cell function in synergy with PD‐1/PD‐L1 immune checkpoint blockade. Future research to engineer CAR T cells with the ability to locally modulate 5‐HT signaling may offer new approaches to reshape the immunosuppressive TME. Alternatively, targeted nanocarrier systems could enable the precise delivery of 5‐HTR antagonists to specific tissues, thereby reducing systemic toxicity. Spatial and temporal modulation of 5‐HT levels, for example, by enhancing 5‐HT signaling in the gut while suppressing it in the CNS, could represent a strategy to maximize therapeutic efficacy while minimizing side effects.
In summary, 5‐HT signaling represents a central interface that links metabolic control, receptor activation, and immune responses across a spectrum of pathophysiological states. Therapeutically targeting the 5‐HT system not only advances mechanistic insights into disease progression but also offers a framework for the development of integrative, multitarget treatment strategies. Continued research into the biology of 5‐HT is expected to accelerate the discovery of novel therapeutics, ultimately improving the management of cancer, neuropsychiatric disorders, GI dysfunction, and metabolic disease.
Author Contributions
Yuxin Zhang: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, writing – original draft, and visualization. Nan Wang: methodology. Louqian Zhang: methodology. Yan Zhuang: methodology. Qilei Xin: investigation. Xiaosong Gu: supervision, visualization, project administration, and funding acquisition. Chunping Jiang: supervision, visualization, project administration, and funding acquisition. Junhua Wu: supervision, visualization, writing – review and editing, project administration, and funding acquisition. All the authors have approved the final version of this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethics Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
Acknowledgments
This work utilized AJE for language editing to ensure grammatical precision and to improve overall readability. BioRender.com was utilized for figure preparation.
Zhang Y., Wang N., Zhang L., et al. “Serotonin (5‐Hydroxytryptamine): Metabolism, Signaling, Biological Functions, Diseases, and Emerging Therapeutic Opportunities.” MedComm 6, no. 9 (2025): 6, e70383. 10.1002/mco2.70383
Yuxin Zhang, Nan Wang and Louqian Zhang contributed equally.
Funding: This study was supported by the Key R&D Program of Shandong Province, China (202502), the Shandong Provincial Laboratory Project (SYS202202), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82272819, 81972888), the Research Project of Jinan Microecological Biomedicine Shandong Laboratory (JNL‐2025008B, JNL‐2025009B, JNL‐2025011B, JNL‐2025010B, JNL‐2025012B, and JNL‐2023017D), and the Primary Research & Development Plan of Jiangsu Province (BE2022840).
Contributor Information
Xiaosong Gu, Email: nervegu@ntu.edu.cn.
Chunping Jiang, Email: chunpingjiang@nju.edu.cn.
Junhua Wu, Email: wujunhua@nju.edu.cn.
Data Availability Statement
No data were used for the research described in the article.
References
- 1. Veenstra‐VanderWeele J., Anderson G. M., and Cook E. H. Jr., “Pharmacogenetics and the Serotonin System: Initial Studies and Future Directions,” European Journal of Pharmacology 410, no. 2‐3 (2000): 165–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Aryal B., Shimizu T., Kadono J., et al., “Post‐Resection Exhaustion of Intra‐Platelet Serotonin: Also an Indicator of Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence?” Journal of Cancer 8, no. 19 (2017): 3984–3991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ruddell R. G., Mann D. A., and Ramm G. A., “The Function of Serotonin Within the Liver,” Journal of Hepatology 48, no. 4 (2008): 666–675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Young S. N., “How to Increase Serotonin in the human Brain Without Drugs,” Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience 32 (2007): 394–399. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kerckhoffs A. P., ter Linde J. J., Akkermans L. M., and Samsom M., “SERT and TPH‐1 mRNA Expression Are Reduced in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients Regardless of Visceral Sensitivity state in Large Intestine,” American Journal of Physiology Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 302, no. 9 (2012): G1053–G1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Pernow B. and Waldenstrom J., “Paroxysmal Flushing and Other Symptoms Caused by 5‐hydroxytryptamine and Histamine in Patients With Malignant Tumours,” Lancet 267, no. 6845 (1954): 951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Rice W. G. and Mitchener J., “Histochemical Evidence of 5‐hydroxytryptamine in a Dog Mast Cell Tumour,” Nature 189 (1961): 767–768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Cîmpeanu R. C., Boldeanu M. V., Ahrițculesei R. V., et al., “Correlation Between Neurotransmitters (Dopamine, Epinephrine, Norepinephrine, Serotonin), Prognostic Nutritional Index, Glasgow Prognostic Score, Systemic Inflammatory Response Markers, and TNM Staging in a Cohort of Colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 13 (2024): 6977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Arreola R., Becerril‐Villanueva E., and Cruz‐Fuentes C., “Immunomodulatory Effects Mediated by Serotonin,” Journal of Immunology Research 2015 (2015): 354957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lesurtel M., Soll C., Graf R., and Clavien P. A., “Role of Serotonin in the Hepato‐gastroIntestinal Tract: An Old Molecule for New Perspectives,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 65, no. 6 (2008): 940–952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Boess F. G. and Martin I. L., “Molecular Biology of 5‐HT Receptors,” Neuropharmacology 33, no. 3‐4 (1994): 275–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Richter G., Stöckmann F., Conlon J. M., and Creutzfeldt W., “Serotonin Release Into Blood After Food and Pentagastrin. Studies in Healthy Subjects and in Patients With Metastatic Carcinoid Tumors,” Gastroenterology 91, no. 3 (1986): 612–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Dioguardi Burgio M., Cros J., and Panvini N., “Serotonin Immunoreactive Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Associated With Main Pancreatic Duct Dilation: A Recognizable Entity With Excellent Long‐term Outcome,” European Radiology 31, no. 11 (2021): 8671–8681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Tanaka H., Sawano T., Konishi N., et al., “Serotonin Induces Arcadlin in Hippocampal Neurons,” Neuroscience Letters 721 (2020): 134783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Pourhamzeh M., Moravej F. G., Arabi M., et al., “The Roles of Serotonin in Neuropsychiatric Disorders,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology 42, no. 6 (2022): 1671–1692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Watts S. W., Morrison S. F., Davis R. P., and Barman S. M., “Serotonin and Blood Pressure Regulation,” Pharmacological Reviews 64, no. 2 (2012): 359–388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Chen F. X., Chen X. S., Guo J. C., Zheng B. A., and Guo M., “Serotonin Transporter‐linked Polymorphic Region Genotypes in Relation to Stress Conditions Among Patients With Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology 12, no. 3 (2019): 968–977. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zopun M., Lieder B., Holik A. K., Ley J. P., Hans J., and Somoza V., “Noncaloric Sweeteners Induce Peripheral Serotonin Secretion via the T1R3‐Dependent Pathway in Human Gastric Parietal Tumor Cells (HGT‐1),” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 66, no. 27 (2018): 7044–7053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Pang Q., Liu C., Zhang J. Y., et al., “Serotonin in Liver Tumor: Friend or Foe?” Hepatology 62, no. 1 (2015): 319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sarrouilhe D., Clarhaut J., Defamie N., and Mesnil M., “Serotonin and Cancer: What Is the Link?” Current Molecular Medicine 15, no. 1 (2015): 62–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sarrouilhe D. and Mesnil M., “Serotonin and human Cancer: A Critical View,” Biochimie 161 (2019): 46–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Balakrishna P., George S., Hatoum H., and Mukherjee S., “Serotonin Pathway in Cancer,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 3 (2021): 1268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zandee W. T., van Adrichem R. C., Kamp K., Feelders R. A., van Velthuysen M. F., and de Herder W. W., “Incidence and Prognostic Value of Serotonin Secretion in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours,” Clinical Endocrinology 87, no. 2 (2017): 165–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Nebigil C. G., Launay J. M., Hickel P., Tournois C., and Maroteaux L., “5‐hydroxytryptamine 2B Receptor Regulates Cell‐cycle Progression: Cross‐talk With Tyrosine Kinase Pathways,” PNAS 97, no. 6 (2000): 2591–2596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Maffei M. E., “5‐Hydroxytryptophan (5‐HTP): Natural Occurrence, Analysis, Biosynthesis, Biotechnology, Physiology and Toxicology,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 1 (2020): 181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Cote F., Thevenot E., Fligny C., et al., “Disruption of the Nonneuronal tph1 Gene Demonstrates the Importance of Peripheral Serotonin in Cardiac Function,” PNAS 100, no. 23 (2003): 13525–13530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Liu Q. Q., Yao X. X., Gao S. H., et al., “Role of 5‐HT Receptors in Neuropathic Pain: Potential Therapeutic Implications,” Pharmacological Research 159 (2020): 104949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Haduch A., Bromek E., Kuban W., and Daniel W. A., “The Engagement of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes in Tryptophan Metabolism,” Metabolites 13, no. 5 (2023): 629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Bhullar J. S., Leung J. M., and Almehthel M. S., “Management of Refractory Hypoglycaemia in a Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumour co‐secreting Serotonin and Insulin,” BMJ Case Reports 13, no. 11 (2020): e236659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Yu L., Li S., Wei J., Sun H., Yang C., and Tan H., “Association of Serotonin Transporter‐linked Polymorphic Region (5‐HTTLPR) With Heat Pain Stimulation and Postoperative Pain in Gastric Cancer Patients,” Molecular Pain 17 (2021): 17448069211006606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hussaarts K., Berger F. A., Binkhorst L., et al., “The Risk of QTc‐Interval Prolongation in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Tamoxifen in Combination With Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors,” Pharmaceutical Research 37, no. 1 (2019): 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Shinka T., Onodera D., Tanaka T., et al., “Serotonin Synthesis and Metabolism‐related Molecules in a human Prostate Cancer Cell Line,” Oncology Letters 2, no. 2 (2011): 211–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Mohammad‐Zadeh L. F., Moses L., and Gwaltney‐Brant S. M., “Serotonin: A Review,” Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 31, no. 3 (2008): 187–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Ferrari M. D., Odink J., Tapparelli C., Van Kempen G. M., Pennings E. J., and Bruyn G. W., “Serotonin Metabolism in Migraine,” Neurology 39, no. 9 (1989): 1239–1242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Youdim M. B. H. and Weinstock M., “Therapeutic Applications of Selective and Non‐Selective Inhibitors of Monoamine Oxidase A and B That Do Not Cause Significant Tyramine Potentiation,” Neurotoxicology 25, no. 1 (2004): 243–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Morita H., Mochiki E., Takahashi N., et al., “Effects of 5‐HT2B, 5‐HT3 and 5‐HT4 Receptor Antagonists on Gastrointestinal Motor Activity in Dogs,” World Journal of Gastroenterology 19, no. 39 (2013): 6604–6612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Grahame‐Smith D. G., “Serotonin (5‐hydroxytryptamine, 5‐HT),” Quarterly Journal of Medicine 67, no. 254 (1988): 459–466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. McLean P. G., Borman R. A., and Lee K., “5‐HT in the Enteric Nervous System: Gut Function and Neuropharmacology,” Trends in Neuroscience (Tins) 30, no. 1 (2007): 9–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Meneses A., “Physiological, Pathophysiological and Therapeutic Roles of 5‐HT Systems in Learning and Memory,” Reviews in the Neurosciences 9, no. 4 (1998): 275–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Green A. R., “Neuropharmacology of 5‐hydroxytryptamine,” British Journal of Pharmacology 147, no. Suppl 1 (2006): S145–S152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Stahl S. M., Lee‐Zimmerman C., Cartwright S., and Morrissette D. A., “Serotonergic Drugs for Depression and Beyond,” Current Drug Targets 14, no. 5 (2013): 578–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Zhang H., Xu H., Tang Q., and Bi F., “The Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Enhance the Cytotoxicity of sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells,” Anti‐Cancer Drugs 32, no. 8 (2021): 793–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Bardin L., “The Complex Role of Serotonin and 5‐HT Receptors in Chronic Pain,” Behavioural Pharmacology 22, no. 5‐6 (2011): 390–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Sommer C., “Serotonin in Pain and Analgesia: Actions in the Periphery,” Molecular Neurobiology 30, no. 2 (2004): 117–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Sommer C., “Is Serotonin Hyperalgesic or Analgesic?” Current Pain and Headache Reports 10, no. 2 (2006): 101–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Suzuki R., Rygh L. J., and Dickenson A. H., “Bad News From the Brain: Descending 5‐HT Pathways That Control Spinal Pain Processing,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 25, no. 12 (2004): 613–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Armstrong D., Dry R. M., Keele C. A., and Markham J. W., “Pain‐producing Actions of Tryptamine and 5‐hydroxytryptamine,” The Journal of Physiology 117, no. 4 (1952): 70p–71p. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Fava M., “The Role of the Serotonergic and Noradrenergic Neurotransmitter Systems in the Treatment of Psychological and Physical Symptoms of Depression,” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 64, no. Suppl 13 (2003): 26–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Peters K. Z., Cheer J. F., and Tonini R., “Modulating the Neuromodulators: Dopamine, Serotonin, and the Endocannabinoid System,” Trends in Neuroscience (Tins) 44, no. 6 (2021): 464–477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Yamamoto R., Ito T., Furuyama T., Ono M., and Kato N., “5‐HT and α‐m‐5‐HT Attenuate Excitatory Synaptic Transmissions Onto the Lateral Amygdala Principal Neurons via Presynaptic 5‐HT(1B) Receptors,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 624 (2022): 28–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Afshar S., Shahidi S., Baooshi H., et al., “The Role of Hippocampal 5‐HT(1D) and 5‐HT(1F) Receptors on Learning and Memory in Rats,” Naunyn‐Schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology 396, no. 7 (2023): 1451–1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Zeng J., Li X., Zhang R., et al., “Local 5‐HT Signaling bi‐directionally Regulates the Coincidence Time Window for Associative Learning,” Neuron 111, no. 7 (2023): 1118–1135. e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Robson M. J., Quinlan M. A., and Blakely R. D., “Immune System Activation and Depression: Roles of Serotonin in the Central Nervous System and Periphery,” Acs Chemical Neuroscience 8, no. 5 (2017): 932–942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Israelyan N., Del Colle A., Li Z., et al., “Effects of Serotonin and Slow‐Release 5‐Hydroxytryptophan on Gastrointestinal Motility in a Mouse Model of Depression,” Gastroenterology 157, no. 2 (2019): 507–521. e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Chen Z., Luo J., Li J., et al., “Interleukin‐33 Promotes Serotonin Release From Enterochromaffin Cells for Intestinal Homeostasis,” Immunity 54, no. 1 (2021): 151–163. e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Spencer N. J. and Keating D. J., “Is There a Role for Endogenous 5‐HT in Gastrointestinal Motility? How Recent Studies Have Changed Our Understanding,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 891 (2016): 113–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Yang M., Fukui H., Eda H., et al., “Involvement of Gut Microbiota in the Association Between Gastrointestinal Motility and 5‑HT Expression/M2 Macrophage Abundance in the Gastrointestinal Tract,” Molecular Medicine Reports 16, no. 3 (2017): 3482–3488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Hanna‐Jairala I. and Drossman D. A., “Central Neuromodulators in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Why, How, and When,” American Journal of Gastroenterology 119, no. 7 (2024): 1272–1284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Bai J., Cai Y., Huang Z., et al., “Shouhui Tongbian Capsule Ameliorates Constipation via Gut Microbiota‐5‐HT‐intestinal Motility Axis,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 154 (2022): 113627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Merecz K., Hirsa M., Biniszewska O., Fichna J., and Tarasiuk A., “An Overview of 5‐HT(3) Receptor Antagonists as a Treatment Option for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea,” Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 24, no. 10 (2023): 1189–1198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Stasi C., Sadalla S., and Milani S., “The Relationship between the Serotonin Metabolism, Gut‐Microbiota and the Gut‐Brain Axis,” Current Drug Metabolism 20, no. 8 (2019): 646–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Kwon Y. H. and Khan W. I., “Peripheral Serotonin: Cultivating Companionship With Gut Microbiota in Intestinal Homeostasis,” American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology 323, no. 2 (2022): C550–C555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Ayme‐Dietrich E., Aubertin‐Kirch G., Maroteaux L., and Monassier L., “Cardiovascular Remodeling and the Peripheral Serotonergic System,” Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 110, no. 1 (2017): 51–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Doggrell S. A., “The Role of 5‐HT on the Cardiovascular and Renal Systems and the Clinical Potential of 5‐HT Modulation,” Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 12, no. 5 (2003): 805–823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Kajiwara N., Kushiro T., and Hayashi H., “[Blood pressure regulation and serotonin],” Nihon Rinsho 43, no. 5 (1985): 923–928. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Schoenichen C., Bode C., and Duerschmied D., “Role of Platelet Serotonin in Innate Immune Cell Recruitment,” Frontiers in Bioscience‐Landmark 24, no. 3 (2019): 514–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Nishihira K., Yamashita A., Tanaka N., et al., “Inhibition of 5‐hydroxytryptamine Receptor Prevents Occlusive Thrombus Formation on Neointima of the Rabbit Femoral Artery,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 4, no. 1 (2006): 247–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Galan A. M., Lopez‐Vilchez I., Diaz‐Ricart M., et al., “Serotonergic Mechanisms Enhance Platelet‐mediated Thrombogenicity,” Thromb Haemost 102, no. 3 (2009): 511–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Liu N., Sun S., Wang P., Sun Y., Hu Q., and Wang X., “The Mechanism of Secretion and Metabolism of Gut‐Derived 5‐Hydroxytryptamine,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 15 (2021): 7931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Wu Y., Ma J., Chen J., et al., “Ablation of CD44 Attenuates Adipogenesis in White Adipocytes via the Tryptophan 5‐Hydroxylase 2/5‐Hydroxytryptamine Axis to Protect Mice From High‐Fat Diet‐Induced Obesity,” American Journal of Pathology 195, no. 2 (2025): 247–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Wu H., Denna T. H., Storkersen J. N., and Gerriets V. A., “Beyond a Neurotransmitter: The Role of Serotonin in Inflammation and Immunity,” Pharmacological Research 140 (2019): 100–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Parajulee A. and Kim K., “Structural Studies of Serotonin Receptor family,” BMB Reports 56, no. 10 (2023): 527–536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Sharp T. and Barnes N. M., “Central 5‐HT Receptors and Their Function; Present and Future,” Neuropharmacology 177 (2020): 108155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Kalinina N. I., Zaitsev A. V., and Vesselkin N. P., “Presynaptic Serotonin 5‐HT(1B/D) Receptor‐mediated Inhibition of Glycinergic Transmission to the Frog Spinal Motoneurons,” Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 204, no. 3 (2018): 329–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Sharma V. K. and Loh Y. P., “The Discovery, Structure, and Function of 5‐HTR1E Serotonin Receptor,” Cell Communication and Signaling 21, no. 1 (2023): 235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Yu J., Wang Z., Chen Y., and Dong Y., “Restraint Stress Disrupted Intestinal Homeostasis via 5‐HT/HTR7/Wnt/β‐Catenin/NF‐kB Signaling,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 9 (2025): 4021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Moutkine I., Collins E. L., Béchade C., and Maroteaux L., “Evolutionary Considerations on 5‐HT(2) Receptors,” Pharmacological Research 140 (2019): 14–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Chaumont‐Dubel S., Dupuy V., Bockaert J., Bécamel C., and Marin P., “The 5‐HT(6) Receptor Interactome: New Insight in Receptor Signaling and Its Impact on Brain Physiology and Pathologies,” Neuropharmacology 172 (2020): 107839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Chagraoui A., Thibaut F., and De Deurwaerdère P., “5‐HT6 receptors: Contemporary Views on Their Neurobiological and Pharmacological Relevance in Neuropsychiatric Disorders,” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 27, no. 1 (2025): 112–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Åstrand A., Guerrieri D., Vikingsson S., Kronstrand R., and Green H., “In Vitro Characterization of New Psychoactive Substances at the μ‐opioid, CB1, 5HT(1A), and 5‐HT(2A) Receptors‐On‐target Receptor Potency and Efficacy, and off‐target Effects,” Forensic Science International 317 (2020): 110553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Tadjalli A. and Mitchell G. S., “Cervical Spinal 5‐HT(2A) and 5‐HT(2B) Receptors Are Both Necessary for Moderate Acute Intermittent Hypoxia‐induced Phrenic Long‐term Facilitation,” Journal of Applied Physiology 127, no. 2 (2019): 432–443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Campos‐Bedolla P., Torrejón‐González E. G., Mendoza‐Mejía D., et al., “Role of 5‐HT2 Receptors family in the Allergy‐induced Increased Aorta Contractile Responses to 5‐HT,” Physiological Research 72, no. 1 (2023): 111–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Fakhfouri G., Mousavizadeh K., Mehr S. E., et al., “From Chemotherapy‐Induced Emesis to Neuroprotection: Therapeutic Opportunities for 5‐HT3 Receptor Antagonists,” Molecular Neurobiology 52, no. 3 (2015): 1670–1679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Cheng Q., Feng X., Meng Q., et al., “[6]‐ Gingerol Ameliorates Cisplatin‐Induced Pica by Regulating the TPH/MAO‐A/SERT/5‐HT/5‐HT(3) Receptor System in Rats,” Drug Design, Development and Therapy 14 (2020): 4085–4099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Pineda‐Farias J. B., Barragán‐Iglesias P., Valdivieso‐Sánchez A., et al., “Spinal 5‐HT(4) and 5‐HT(6) Receptors Contribute to the Maintenance of Neuropathic Pain in Rats,” Pharmacology Reports 69, no. 5 (2017): 916–923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Petelák A., Lambert N. A., and Bondar A., “Serotonin 5‐HT(7) Receptor Slows Down the G(s) Protein: A Single Molecule Perspective,” Molecular Biology of the Cell 34, no. 9 (2023): br14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Zhou Y., Ma J., Lin X., Huang X. P., Wu K., and Huang N., “Structure‐Based Discovery of Novel and Selective 5‐Hydroxytryptamine 2B Receptor Antagonists for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 59, no. 2 (2016): 707–720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Mao B., Liu S., Zhu S., et al., “The janus Face of Serotonin: Regenerative Promoter and Chronic Liver Disease Aggravator,” Heliyon 10, no. 9 (2024): e30703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Tay R. E., Ho C. M., Ang N. D. Z., et al., “Serotonin Receptor 5‐HT(2A) as a Potential Target for HCC Immunotherapy,” Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer 13, no. 6 (2025): e011088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Hoyer D., “5‐HT Receptor Nomenclature: Naming Names, Does It Matter? A Tribute to Maurice Rapport,” Acs Chemical Neuroscience 8, no. 5 (2017): 908–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Brodde O. E., “5‐Hydroxytryptamine‐receptor Subtypes,” Clinical Physiology and Biochemistry 8, no. Suppl 3 (1990): 19–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. López‐Giménez J. F. and González‐Maeso J., “Hallucinogens and Serotonin 5‐HT(2A) Receptor‐Mediated Signaling Pathways,” Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences 36 (2018): 45–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Kim K., Che T., Panova O., et al., “Structure of a Hallucinogen‐Activated Gq‐Coupled 5‐HT(2A) Serotonin Receptor,” Cell 182, no. 6 (2020): 1574–1588. e19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Zimering M. B., “Severe COVID‐19 Pneumonia Is Associated With Increased Plasma Immunoglobulin G Agonist Autoantibodies Targeting the 5‐Hydroxytryptamine 2A Receptor,” Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism 5, no. 1 (2021): 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Borroto‐Escuela D. O., Li X., Tarakanov A. O., et al., “Existence of Brain 5‐HT1A‐5‐HT2A Isoreceptor Complexes With Antagonistic Allosteric Receptor‐Receptor Interactions Regulating 5‐HT1A Receptor Recognition,” ACS Omega 2, no. 8 (2017): 4779–4789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Barclay Z., Dickson L., Robertson D., et al., “Attenuated PLD1 Association and Signalling at the H452Y Polymorphic Form of the 5‐HT(2A) Receptor,” Cell Signalling 25, no. 4 (2013): 814–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Iglesias A., Cimadevila M., Cadavid M. I., Loza M. I., and Brea J., “Serotonin‐2A Homodimers Are Needed for Signalling via both Phospholipase A(2) and Phospholipase C in Transfected CHO Cells,” European Journal of Pharmacology 800 (2017): 63–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Barclay Z., Dickson L., Robertson D. N., et al., “5‐HT2A receptor Signalling Through Phospholipase D1 Associated With Its C‐terminal Tail,” Biochemical Journal 436, no. 3 (2011): 651–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Desouza L. A., Benekareddy M., Fanibunda S. E., et al., “The Hallucinogenic Serotonin(2A) Receptor Agonist, 2,5‐Dimethoxy‐4‐Iodoamphetamine, Promotes cAMP Response Element Binding Protein‐Dependent Gene Expression of Specific Plasticity‐Associated Genes in the Rodent Neocortex,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 14 (2021): 790213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Zhu H., Liu X., Wang X., et al., “Gβγ Subunit Inhibitor Decreases DOM‐induced Head Twitch Response via the PLCβ/IP3/Ca(2+)/ERK and cAMP Signaling Pathways,” European Journal of Pharmacology 957 (2023): 176038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Borsini F., Giraldo E., and Monferini E., “BIMT 17, a 5‐HT2A Receptor Antagonist and 5‐HT1A Receptor Full Agonist in Rat Cerebral Cortex,” Naunyn‐Schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology 352, no. 3 (1995): 276–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. El‐Tanbouly D. M., Wadie W., and Sayed R. H., “Modulation of TGF‐β/Smad and ERK Signaling Pathways Mediates the Anti‐fibrotic Effect of Mirtazapine in Mice,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 329 (2017): 224–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Marinova Z., Walitza S., and Grünblatt E., “5‐HT2A serotonin Receptor Agonist DOI Alleviates Cytotoxicity in Neuroblastoma Cells: Role of the ERK Pathway,” Progress in Neuro‐Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 44 (2013): 64–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Florian J. A. and Watts S. W., “Integration of Mitogen‐activated Protein Kinase Kinase Activation in Vascular 5‐hydroxytryptamine2A Receptor Signal Transduction,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 284, no. 1 (1998): 346–355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Göőz M., Göőz P., Luttrell L. M., and Raymond J. R., “5‐HT2A receptor Induces ERK Phosphorylation and Proliferation Through ADAM‐17 Tumor Necrosis Factor‐alpha‐converting Enzyme (TACE) Activation and Heparin‐bound Epidermal Growth Factor‐Like Growth Factor (HB‐EGF) Shedding in Mesangial Cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, no. 30 (2006): 21004–21012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Watts S. W., “Activation of the Mitogen‐activated Protein Kinase Pathway via the 5‐HT2A Receptor,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 861 (1998): 162–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Avdonin P. V., Nadeev A. D., Mironova G. Y., Zharkikh I. L., Avdonin P. P., and Goncharov N. V., “Enhancement by Hydrogen Peroxide of Calcium Signals in Endothelial Cells Induced by 5‐HT1B and 5‐HT2B Receptor Agonists,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2019 (2019): 1701478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Oufkir T., Arseneault M., Sanderson J. T., and Vaillancourt C., “The 5‐HT 2A Serotonin Receptor Enhances Cell Viability, Affects Cell Cycle Progression and Activates MEK‐ERK1/2 and JAK2‐STAT3 Signalling Pathways in human Choriocarcinoma Cell Lines,” Placenta 31, no. 5 (2010): 439–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Klempan T., Hudon‐Thibeault A. A., Oufkir T., Vaillancourt C., and Sanderson J. T., “Stimulation of Serotonergic 5‐HT2A Receptor Signaling Increases Placental Aromatase (CYP19) Activity and Expression in BeWo and JEG‐3 human Choriocarcinoma Cells,” Placenta 32, no. 9 (2011): 651–656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Ahmed M. I., Abdelrazek H. M. A., Moustafa Y. M., et al., “Cardioprotective Effect of Flibanserin Against Isoproterenol‐Induced Myocardial Infarction in Female Rats: Role of Cardiac 5‐HT2A Receptor Gene/5‐HT/Ca(2+) Pathway,” Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 16, no. 4 (2023): 502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Kanda Y., Okada M., Ikarashi R., Morioka E., Kondo T., and Ikeda M., “Bimodal Modulation of Store‐operated Ca(2+) Channels by Clozapine in Astrocytes,” Neuroscience Letters 635 (2016): 56–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Voronova I. P., Khramova G. M., Kulikova E. A., Petrovskii D. V., Bazovkina D. V., and Kulikov A. V., “5‐HT2A receptors Control Body Temperature in Mice During LPS‐induced Inflammation via Regulation of NO Production,” Pharmacological Research 103 (2016): 123–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Padhariya K., Bhandare R., Canney D., and Velingkar V., “Cardiovascular Concern of 5‐HT2B Receptor and Recent Vistas in the Development of Its Antagonists,” Cardiovascular & Hematological Disorders‐Drug Targets 17, no. 2 (2017): 86–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Janssen W., Schymura Y., Novoyatleva T., et al., “5‐HT2B receptor Antagonists Inhibit Fibrosis and Protect From RV Heart Failure,” BioMed Research International 2015 (2015): 438403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Fatima S., Shi X., Lin Z., et al., “5‐Hydroxytryptamine Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Proliferation by Influencing β‐catenin,” Molecular Oncology 10, no. 2 (2016): 195–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Launay J. M., Birraux G., Bondoux D., et al., “Ras Involvement in Signal Transduction by the Serotonin 5‐HT2B Receptor,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 271, no. 6 (1996): 3141–3147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Barnes N. M., Hales T. G., Lummis S. C., and Peters J. A., “The 5‐HT3 Receptor–the Relationship Between Structure and Function,” Neuropharmacology 56, no. 1 (2009): 273–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Lummis S. C., “5‐HT(3) Receptors,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 287, no. 48 (2012): 40239–40245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Thompson A. J. and Lummis S. C., “5‐HT3 receptors,” Current Pharmaceutical Design 12, no. 28 (2006): 3615–3630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Barzegar‐Fallah A., Alimoradi H., Dunlop J. L., Torbati E., and Baird S. K., “Serotonin Type‐3 Receptor Antagonists Selectively Kill Melanoma Cells Through Classical Apoptosis, Microtubule Depolymerisation, ERK Activation, and NF‐kappaB Downregulation,” Cell Biology and Toxicology (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. El‐Khatib S. M. and Preston A. M., “Effect of Palytoxin and Serotonin on Murine Tumor Cells,” JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 63, no. 1 (1979): 75–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Linden D. R. and El‐Fakahany E. E., “Microglial Derived Nitric Oxide Decreases Serotonin Content in Rat Basophilic Leukemia (RBL‐2H3) Cells,” European Journal of Pharmacology 436, no. 1‐2 (2002): 53–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Tone M., Tahara S., Nojima S., Motooka D., Okuzaki D., and Morii E., “HTR3A is Correlated With Unfavorable Histology and Promotes Proliferation Through ERK Phosphorylation in Lung Adenocarcinoma,” Cancer Science 111, no. 10 (2020): 3953–3961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Lanfumey L. and Hamon M., “5‐HT1 receptors,” Current Drug Targets. CNS and Neurological Disorders 3, no. 1 (2004): 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Xu P., Huang S., Zhang H., et al., “Structural Insights Into the Lipid and Ligand Regulation of Serotonin Receptors,” Nature 592, no. 7854 (2021): 469–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Tang G. Y., Wang R. J., Guo Y., and Liu J., “5‐HT(1B) Receptor‐AC‐PKA Signal Pathway in the Lateral Habenula Is Involved in the Regulation of Depressive‐Like Behaviors in 6‐hydroxydopamine‐induced Parkinson's Rats,” Neurological Research 45, no. 2 (2023): 127–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Albert P. R. and Vahid‐Ansari F., “The 5‐HT1A Receptor: Signaling to Behavior,” Biochimie 161 (2019): 34–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Ni Y. G., Panicker M. M., and Miledi R., “Efficient Coupling of 5‐HT1a Receptors to the Phospholipase C Pathway in Xenopus Oocytes,” Brain Research Molecular Brain Research 51, no. 1‐2 (1997): 115–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Berg K. A. and Clarke W. P., “Regulation of 5‐HT(1A) and 5‐HT(1B) Receptor Systems by Phospholipid Signaling Cascades,” Brain Research Bulletin 56, no. 5 (2001): 471–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Zhang M., Qian X., Wei Z., et al., “Micro‐Infusion of 5‐HT1a Receptor Antagonists Into the Ventral Subiculum Ameliorate MK‐801 Induced Schizophrenia‐Like Behavior in Rats,” Neuroscience 552 (2024): 115–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Gurbuz N., Asoglu M. R., Ashour A. A., Salama S., Kilic G. S., and Ozpolat B., “A Selective Serotonin 5‐HT(1B) Receptor Inhibition Suppresses Cells Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis in human Uterine Leiomyoma Cells,” European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 206 (2016): 114–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Liu Y., Suzuki Y. J., Day R. M., and Fanburg B L., “Rho Kinase‐induced Nuclear Translocation of ERK1/ERK2 in Smooth Muscle Cell Mitogenesis Caused by Serotonin,” Circulation Research 95, no. 6 (2004): 579–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Mukhin Y. V., Garnovskaya M. N., Collinsworth G., et al., “5‐Hydroxytryptamine1A receptor/Gibetagamma Stimulates Mitogen‐activated Protein Kinase via NAD(P)H Oxidase and Reactive Oxygen Species Upstream of Src in chinese Hamster Ovary Fibroblasts,” Biochemical Journal 347, no. Pt 1 (2000): 61–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Machida T., Iizuka K., and Hirafuji M., “5‐hydroxytryptamine and Its Receptors in Systemic Vascular Walls,” Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin 36, no. 9 (2013): 1416–1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Hemmati S., Rahimi N., Dabiri S., Alaeddini M., Etemad‐Moghadam S., and Dehpour A. R., “Inhibition of Ovalbumin‐induced Allergic Rhinitis by sumatriptan Through the Nitric Oxide Pathway in Mice,” Life Sciences 236 (2019): 116901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Iwabayashi M., Taniyama Y., Sanada F., et al., “Role of Serotonin in Angiogenesis: Induction of Angiogenesis by Sarpogrelate via Endothelial 5‐HT1B/Akt/eNOS Pathway in Diabetic Mice,” Atherosclerosis 220, no. 2 (2012): 337–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Lee J. J., Hahm E. T., Lee C. H., and Cho Y. W., “5‐HT1A receptor‐mediated Activation of a G‐protein‐coupled Inwardly Rectifying K+ Current in Rat Medial Preoptic Area Neurons,” European Journal of Pharmacology 586, no. 1‐3 (2008): 114–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Amber‐Cicek F., Ugur O., Sayar K., and Ugur M., “Cell Adhesion Modulates 5‐HT(1D) and P2Y Receptor Signal Trafficking Differentially in LTK‐8 Cells,” European Journal of Pharmacology 590, no. 1‐3 (2008): 12–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Middlemiss D. N., “The Putative 5‐HT1 Receptor Agonist, RU 24969, Inhibits the Efflux of 5‐hydroxytryptamine From Rat Frontal Cortex Slices by Stimulation of the 5‐HT Autoreceptor,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 37, no. 6 (1985): 434–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Zhao X., Zhang Y., Qin W., et al., “Serotonin Type‐1D Receptor Stimulation of A‐type K(+) Channel Decreases Membrane Excitability Through the Protein Kinase A‐ and B‐Raf‐dependent p38 MAPK Pathways in Mouse Trigeminal Ganglion Neurons,” Cell Signalling 28, no. 8 (2016): 979–988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Debata P. R., Ranasinghe B., Berliner A., et al., “Erk1/2‐dependent Phosphorylation of PKCalpha at Threonine 638 in Hippocampal 5‐HT(1A) Receptor‐mediated Signaling,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 397, no. 3 (2010): 401–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Leone A. M., Errico M., Lin S. L., and Cowen D. S., “Activation of Extracellular Signal‐regulated Kinase (ERK) and Akt by human Serotonin 5‐HT(1B) Receptors in Transfected BE(2)‐C Neuroblastoma Cells Is Inhibited by RGS4,” Journal of Neurochemistry 75, no. 3 (2000): 934–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Capi M., De Angelis V., De Bernardini D., et al., “CGRP Receptor Antagonists and 5‐HT1F Receptor Agonist in the Treatment of Migraine,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 7 (2021): 1429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Bockaert J., Claeysen S., Compan V., and Dumuis A., “5‐HT4 receptors,” Current Drug Targets CNS and Neurological Disorders 3, no. 1 (2004): 39–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Hegde S. S. and Eglen R. M., “Peripheral 5‐HT4 Receptors,” Faseb Journal 10, no. 12 (1996): 1398–1407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Weninger S., Van Craenenbroeck K., Cameron R. T., et al., “Phosphodiesterase 4 Interacts With the 5‐HT4(b) Receptor to Regulate cAMP Signaling,” Cell Signalling 26, no. 11 (2014): 2573–2582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Yu Z., Zikela L., Wang D., et al., “Effects and Mechanisms of Sciadonic Acid on Colonic Transit Function Through Regulating 5‐HT4/cAMP/PKA/AQP4 Signaling Pathway in STC Model Mice,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 131 (2024): 109676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Cherkashin A. P., Rogachevskaja O. A., Kabanova N. V., Kotova P. D., Bystrova M. F., and Kolesnikov S. S., “Taste Cells of the Type III Employ CASR to Maintain Steady Serotonin Exocytosis at Variable Ca(2+) in the Extracellular Medium,” Cells 11, no. 8 (2022): 1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Kellum J. M., Budhoo M. R., Siriwardena A. K., Smith E. P., and Jebraili S. A., “Serotonin Induces Cl‐ secretion in human Jejunal Mucosa in Vitro via a Nonneural Pathway at a 5‐HT4 Receptor,” American Journal of Physiology 267, no. 3 Pt 1 (1994): G357–G363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Budhoo M. R., Harris R. P., and Kellum J. M., “5‐Hydroxytryptamine‐induced Cl‐ transport Is Mediated by 5‐HT3 and 5‐HT4 Receptors in the Rat Distal Colon,” European Journal of Pharmacology 298, no. 2 (1996): 137–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Kim H. W., Li H., Kim H. S., et al., “Cisapride, a Selective Serotonin 5‐HT4‐receptor Agonist, Inhibits Voltage‐dependent K(+) Channels in Rabbit Coronary Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 478, no. 3 (2016): 1423–1428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Fagni L., Dumuis A., Sebben M., and Bockaert J., “The 5‐HT4 Receptor Subtype Inhibits K+ Current in Colliculi Neurones via Activation of a Cyclic AMP‐dependent Protein Kinase,” British Journal of Pharmacology 105, no. 4 (1992): 973–979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Lecouflet P., Roux C. M., Potier B., et al., “Interplay Between 5‐HT4 Receptors and GABAergic System Within CA1 Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity,” Cerebral Cortex 31, no. 1 (2021): 694–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Sgambato V., “The Serotonin 4 Receptor Subtype: A Target of Particular Interest, Especially for Brain Disorders,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 10 (2024): 5245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Claeysen S., Faye P., Sebben M., Taviaux S., Bockaert J., and Dumuis A., “5‐HT4 receptors: Cloning and Expression of New Splice Variants,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 861 (1998): 49–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Irving H. R., Tochon‐Danguy N., Chinkwo K. A., et al., “Investigations Into the Binding Affinities of Different human 5‐HT4 Receptor Splice Variants,” Pharmacology 85, no. 4 (2010): 224–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Brattelid T., Kvingedal A. M., Krobert K. A., et al., “Cloning, Pharmacological Characterisation and Tissue Distribution of a Novel 5‐HT4 Receptor Splice Variant, 5‐HT4(i),” Naunyn‐Schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology 369, no. 6 (2004): 616–628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Nelson D. L., “5‐HT5 receptors,” Current Drug Targets CNS and Neurological Disorders 3, no. 1 (2004): 53–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Aparicio‐Nava L., Márquez‐García L. A., and Meneses A., “Effects of 5‐HT(5A) Receptor Blockade on Amnesia or Forgetting,” Behavioural Brain Research 357‐358 (2019): 98–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Kinsey A. M., Wainwright A., Heavens R., Sirinathsinghji D. J., and Oliver K. R., “Distribution of 5‐ht(5A), 5‐ht(5B), 5‐ht(6) and 5‐HT(7) Receptor mRNAs in the Rat Brain,” Brain Research Molecular Brain Research 88, no. 1‐2 (2001): 194–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Thomas D. R., “5‐ht5A receptors as a Therapeutic Target,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics 111, no. 3 (2006): 707–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Gwynne W. D., Shakeel M. S., Girgis‐Gabardo A., et al., “Antagonists of the Serotonin Receptor 5A Target human Breast Tumor Initiating Cells,” BMC cancer 20, no. 1 (2020): 724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Noda M., Yasuda S., Okada M., et al., “Recombinant human Serotonin 5A Receptors Stably Expressed in C6 Glioma Cells Couple to Multiple Signal Transduction Pathways,” Journal of Neurochemistry 84, no. 2 (2003): 222–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Yamazaki M., Harada K., Yamamoto N., et al., “ASP5736, a Novel 5‐HT5A Receptor Antagonist, Ameliorates Positive Symptoms and Cognitive Impairment in Animal Models of Schizophrenia,” European Neuropsychopharmacology 24, no. 10 (2014): 1698–1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Riccioni T., “5‐HT6 receptor Characterization,” International Review of Neurobiology 94 (2010): 67–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Sleight A. J., Boess F. G., Bös M., and Bourson A., “The Putative 5‐ht6 Receptor: Localization and Function,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 861 (1998): 91–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Nikiforuk A., “The Procognitive Effects of 5‐HT6 Receptor Ligands in Animal Models of Schizophrenia,” Reviews in the Neurosciences 25, no. 3 (2014): 367–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Zhang Y. X., Yang M., Liang F., et al., “The Pronociceptive Role of 5‐HT(6) Receptors in Ventrolateral Orbital Cortex in a Rat Formalin Test Model,” Neurochemistry International 131 (2019): 104562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Gottlieb N., Li T. Y., Young A. H., and Stokes P. R., “The 5‐HT7 Receptor System as a Treatment Target for Mood and Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Psychopharmacology 37, no. 12 (2023): 1167–1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Gellynck E., Heyninck K., Andressen K. W., et al., “The Serotonin 5‐HT7 Receptors: Two Decades of Research,” Experimental Brain Research 230, no. 4 (2013): 555–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Monti J. M. and Jantos H., “The Role of Serotonin 5‐HT7 Receptor in Regulating Sleep and Wakefulness,” Reviews in the Neurosciences 25, no. 3 (2014): 429–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Fukuyama K., Motomura E., and Okada M., “Brexpiprazole Reduces 5‐HT7 Receptor Function on Astroglial Transmission Systems,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 12 (2022): 6571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Hedlund P. B. and Sutcliffe J. G., “Functional, Molecular and Pharmacological Advances in 5‐HT7 Receptor Research,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 25, no. 9 (2004): 481–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Lenglet S., Louiset E., Delarue C., Vaudry H., and Contesse V., “Activation of 5‐HT(7) Receptor in Rat Glomerulosa Cells Is Associated With an Increase in Adenylyl Cyclase Activity and Calcium Influx Through T‐type Calcium Channels,” Endocrinology 143, no. 5 (2002): 1748–1760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Matthys A., Haegeman G., Van Craenenbroeck K., and Vanhoenacker P., “Role of the 5‐HT7 Receptor in the central Nervous System: From Current Status to Future Perspectives,” Molecular Neurobiology 43, no. 3 (2011): 228–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Kolaj M., Zhang L., and Renaud L. P., “Novel Coupling Between TRPC‐Like and KNa Channels Modulates Low Threshold Spike‐induced Afterpotentials in Rat Thalamic Midline Neurons,” Neuropharmacology 86 (2014): 88–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Kawahara F., Saito H., and Katsuki H., “Inhibition by 5‐HT7 Receptor Stimulation of GABAA Receptor‐activated Current in Cultured Rat Suprachiasmatic Neurones,” The Journal of Physiology 478, no. Pt 1 (1994): 67–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Chapin E. M. and Andrade R., “A 5‐HT(7) Receptor‐mediated Depolarization in the Anterodorsal Thalamus. II. Involvement of the Hyperpolarization‐activated Current I(h),” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 297, no. 1 (2001): 403–409. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Saha S. and González‐Maeso J., “The Crosstalk Between 5‐HT(2A)R and mGluR2 in Schizophrenia,” Neuropharmacology 230 (2023): 109489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Pan R., Wang L., Xu X., et al., “Crosstalk Between the Gut Microbiome and Colonic Motility in Chronic Constipation: Potential Mechanisms and Microbiota Modulation,” Nutrients 14, no. 18 (2022): 3704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Eriksson T. M., Holst S., Stan T. L., et al., “5‐HT1A and 5‐HT7 Receptor Crosstalk in the Regulation of Emotional Memory: Implications for Effects of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors,” Neuropharmacology 63, no. 6 (2012): 1150–1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Zhang H., Hasegawa Y., Suzuki M., et al., “Mouse Enteric Neurons Control Intestinal Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Function via Serotonin‐HTR7 Signaling,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 9237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Poulie C. B. M., Liu N., Jensen A. A., and Bunch L., “Design, Synthesis, and Pharmacological Characterization of Heterobivalent Ligands for the Putative 5‐HT(2A)/mGlu(2) Receptor Complex,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 63, no. 17 (2020): 9928–9949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Albizu L., Holloway T., González‐Maeso J., and Sealfon S. C., “Functional Crosstalk and Heteromerization of Serotonin 5‐HT2A and Dopamine D2 Receptors,” Neuropharmacology 61, no. 4 (2011): 770–777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185. Ibi D., “Role of Interaction of mGlu2 and 5‐HT(2A) Receptors in Antipsychotic Effects,” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 221 (2022): 173474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186. Taddeucci A., Olivero G., Roggeri A., et al., “Presynaptic 5‐HT(2A)‐mGlu2/3 Receptor‐Receptor Crosstalk in the Prefrontal Cortex: Metamodulation of Glutamate Exocytosis,” Cells 11, no. 19 (2022): 3035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Wischhof L. and Koch M., “5‐HT2A and mGlu2/3 Receptor Interactions: On Their Relevance to Cognitive Function and Psychosis,” Behavioural Pharmacology 27, no. 1 (2016): 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Chang‐Halabi Y., Cordero J., Sarabia X., Villalobos D., and Barrera N. P., “Crosstalking Interactions Between P2X4 and 5‐HT(3A) Receptors,” Neuropharmacology 236 (2023): 109574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189. Burnat G., Brański P., Solich J., et al., “The Functional Cooperation of 5‐HT(1A) and mGlu4R in HEK‐293 Cell Line,” Pharmacology Reports 72, no. 5 (2020): 1358–1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Chruścicka B., Cowan C. S. M., and Wallace Fitzsimons S. E., “Molecular, Biochemical and Behavioural Evidence for a Novel Oxytocin Receptor and Serotonin 2C Receptor Heterocomplex,” Neuropharmacology 183 (2021): 108394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Wang Y., Wang D., Chen Y., Fang X., Yu L., and Zhang C., “A Novel Synthetic Interfering Peptide Tat‐3L4F Attenuates Olanzapine‐Induced Weight Gain through Disrupting Crosstalk between Serotonin Receptor 2C and Protein Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog in Rats,” The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 23, no. 8 (2020): 481–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Hoyer D., Hannon J. P., and Martin G. R., “Molecular, Pharmacological and Functional Diversity of 5‐HT Receptors,” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 71, no. 4 (2002): 533–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193. Perim R. R., Fields D. P., and Mitchell G. S., “Cross‐talk Inhibition Between 5‐HT(2B) and 5‐HT(7) Receptors in Phrenic Motor Facilitation via NADPH Oxidase and PKA,” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 314, no. 5 (2018): R709–R715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. Salkin H., Satir‐Basaran G., Korkmaz S., Burcin Gonen Z., and Erdem Basaran K., “Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐derived Conditioned Medium and Methysergide Give Rise to Crosstalk Inhibition of 5‐HT2A and 5‐HT7 Receptors in Neuroblastoma Cells,” Brain Research 1808 (2023): 148354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Fink K. B. and Göthert M., “5‐HT Receptor Regulation of Neurotransmitter Release,” Pharmacological Reviews 59, no. 4 (2007): 360–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Takahashi M., Kobayashi Y., Ando K., Saito Y., and Hisanaga S. I., “Cyclin‐dependent Kinase 5 Promotes Proteasomal Degradation of the 5‐HT(1A) Receptor via Phosphorylation,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 510, no. 3 (2019): 370–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Liu Y., Gibson A. W., Levinstein M. R., Lesiak A. J., Ong S. E., and Neumaier J. F., “5‐HT(1B) Receptor‐Mediated Activation of ERK1/2 Requires both Gα(i/o) and β‐Arrestin Proteins,” Acs Chemical Neuroscience 10, no. 7 (2019): 3143–3153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Magalhaes A. C., Holmes K. D., Dale L. B., et al., “CRF Receptor 1 Regulates Anxiety Behavior via Sensitization of 5‐HT2 Receptor Signaling,” Nature Neuroscience 13, no. 5 (2010): 622–629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199. Chen C. H., Paing M. M., and Trejo J., “Termination of Protease‐activated Receptor‐1 Signaling by Beta‐arrestins Is Independent of Receptor Phosphorylation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, no. 11 (2004): 10020–10031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200. Mialet J., Fischmeister R., and Lezoualc'h F., “Characterization of human 5‐HT4(d) Receptor Desensitization in CHO Cells,” British Journal of Pharmacology 138, no. 3 (2003): 445–452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201. Janetzko J., Kise R., Barsi‐Rhyne B., et al., “Membrane Phosphoinositides Regulate GPCR‐β‐arrestin Complex Assembly and Dynamics,” Cell 185, no. 24 (2022): 4560–4573. e19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Ragini S., Saini A., and Mani I., “Endocytosis and Signaling of 5‐HT1A Receptor,” Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science 196 (2023): 113–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203. Wang S., Liu H., Roberts J. B., et al., “Prolonged Ethanol Exposure Modulates Constitutive Internalization and Recycling of 5‐HT1A Receptors,” Journal of Neurochemistry 160, no. 4 (2022): 469–481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204. Gaidarov I., Frazer J., Chen X., et al., “Mechanisms of Constitutive and Agonist‐induced 5‐HT(2B) Internalization, Persistent Endosomal Signaling and Paradoxical Regulation of Agonist Pharmacology,” Cell Signalling 131 (2025): 111769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205. Dunn H. A., Walther C., Yuan G. Y., Caetano F. A., Godin C. M., and Ferguson S. S., “Role of SAP97 in the Regulation of 5‐HT2AR Endocytosis and Signaling,” Molecular Pharmacology 86, no. 3 (2014): 275–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206. Kowal D., Zhang J., Nawoschik S., et al., “The C‐terminus of Gi family G‐proteins as a Determinant of 5‐HT(1A) Receptor Coupling,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 294, no. 3 (2002): 655–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207. Soiza‐Reilly M. and Commons K. G., “Glutamatergic Drive of the Dorsal Raphe Nucleus,” Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 41, no. 4 (2011): 247–255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208. Li B. Y. and Li W. H., “Effects of 5‐HT Released From Platelets on Thrombin‐induced Aggregation and ATP Release in Rabbit Platelets in Vitro,” Zhongguo Yao Li Xue Bao = Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 19, no. 4 (1998): 383–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209. Gwynne W. D., Hallett R. M., Girgis‐Gabardo A., et al., “Serotonergic System Antagonists Target Breast Tumor Initiating Cells and Synergize With Chemotherapy to Shrink human Breast Tumor Xenografts,” Oncotarget 8, no. 19 (2017): 32101–32116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210. Masab M. and Saif M. W., “Telotristat ethyl: Proof of Principle and the First Oral Agent in the Management of Well‐differentiated Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor and Carcinoid Syndrome Diarrhea,” Cancer Chemotheraphy and Pharmacology 80, no. 6 (2017): 1055–1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211. Morse M. A., Liu E., Joish V. N., et al., “Antiproliferative Effects of Telotristat Ethyl in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors: The TELEACE Real‐World Chart Review Study,” Cancer Management and Research 12 (2020): 6607–6614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212. Schneider M. A., Heeb L., Beffinger M. M., et al., “Attenuation of Peripheral Serotonin Inhibits Tumor Growth and Enhances Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy in Murine Tumor Models,” Science Translational Medicine 13, no. 611 (2021): eabc8188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213. Tow D. H., Tran C. G., Borbon L. C., et al., “Inhibition of Serotonin Biosynthesis in Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Suppresses Tumor Growth in Vivo,” BioRxiv (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 214. Zhang J., Guo Z., Xie Q., Zhong C., Gao X., and Yang Q., “Tryptophan Hydroxylase 1 Drives Glioma Progression by Modulating the Serotonin/L1CAM/NF‐kappaB Signaling Pathway,” BMC cancer 22, no. 1 (2022): 457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215. Alpini G., Invernizzi P., Gaudio E., et al., “Serotonin Metabolism Is Dysregulated in Cholangiocarcinoma, Which Has Implications for Tumor Growth,” Cancer Research 68, no. 22 (2008): 9184–9193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216. Frick L. R., Rapanelli M., Arcos M. L., Cremaschi G. A., and Genaro A M., “Oral Administration of Fluoxetine Alters the Proliferation/Apoptosis Balance of Lymphoma Cells and Up‐regulates T Cell Immunity in Tumor‐bearing Mice,” European Journal of Pharmacology 659, no. 2‐3 (2011): 265–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217. Saponara E., Visentin M., Baschieri F., et al., “Serotonin Uptake Is Required for Rac1 Activation in Kras‐induced Acinar‐to‐ductal Metaplasia in the Pancreas,” Journal of Pathology 246, no. 3 (2018): 352–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218. Peer D., Dekel Y., Melikhov D., and Margalit R., “Fluoxetine Inhibits Multidrug Resistance Extrusion Pumps and Enhances Responses to Chemotherapy in Syngeneic and in human Xenograft Mouse Tumor Models,” Cancer Research 64, no. 20 (2004): 7562–7569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219. van Noort V., Scholch S., Iskar M., et al., “Novel Drug Candidates for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Through Global Inverse Gene‐expression Profiling,” Cancer Research 74, no. 20 (2014): 5690–5699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220. Jiang X., Lu W., Shen X., et al., “Repurposing Sertraline Sensitizes Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer Cells to Erlotinib by Inducing Autophagy,” JCI Insight 3, no. 11 (2018): e98921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221. Shen Y., Luo X., Li H., Chen Z., Guan Q., and Cheng L., “Simple and Reliable Serotonin Assay in human Serum by LC‐MS/MS Method Coupled With One Step Protein Precipitation for Clinical Testing in Patients With Carcinoid Tumors,” Journal of Chromatography. B, Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences 1158 (2020): 122395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222. Mitsis M., Markopoulos G., Alexiou G. A., et al., “Antiproliferative and Cytotoxic Action of N‐(p‐coumaroyl) serotonin in Lung Cancer Cells,” Journal of Buon 23, no. 6 (2018): 1693–1698. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223. Wu J. B., Lin T. P., Gallagher J. D., et al., “Monoamine Oxidase A Inhibitor‐near‐infrared Dye Conjugate Reduces Prostate Tumor Growth,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 137, no. 6 (2015): 2366–2374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224. Kushal S., Wang W., Vaikari V. P., et al., “Monoamine Oxidase A (MAO A) Inhibitors Decrease Glioma Progression,” Oncotarget 7, no. 12 (2016): 13842–13853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225. Li P. C., Chen S. Y., Xiangfei D., Mao C., Wu C. H., and Shih J C., “PAMs Inhibits Monoamine Oxidase a Activity and Reduces Glioma Tumor Growth, a Potential Adjuvant Treatment for Glioma,” BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 20, no. 1 (2020): 252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226. Wang Y. C., Wang X., Yu J., et al., “Targeting Monoamine Oxidase A‐regulated Tumor‐associated Macrophage Polarization for Cancer Immunotherapy,” Nature Communications 12, no. 1 (2021): 3530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227. Wang X., Li B., Kim Y. J., et al., “Targeting Monoamine Oxidase A for T Cell‐based Cancer Immunotherapy,” Science Immunology 6, no. 59 (2021): eabh2383–eabh2383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228. Li P. C., Siddiqi I. N., Mottok A., et al., “Monoamine Oxidase A Is Highly Expressed in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma,” Journal of Pathology 243, no. 2 (2017): 220–229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229. Wang K., Luo J., Yeh S., et al., “The MAO Inhibitors Phenelzine and Clorgyline Revert Enzalutamide Resistance in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer,” Nature Communications 11, no. 1 (2020): 2689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230. Vanneste M., Venzke A., Guin S., et al., “The Anti‐cancer Efficacy of a Novel Phenothiazine Derivative Is Independent of Dopamine and Serotonin Receptor Inhibition,” Frontiers in oncology 13 (2023): 1295185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231. Dizeyi N., Hedlund P., Bjartell A., Tinzl M., Austild‐Tasken K., and Abrahamsson P A., “Serotonin Activates MAP Kinase and PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathways in Prostate Cancer Cell Lines,” Urologic Oncology 29, no. 4 (2011): 436–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232. Jose J., Tavares C. D. J., Ebelt N. D., et al., “Serotonin Analogues as Inhibitors of Breast Cancer Cell Growth,” Acs Medicinal Chemistry Letters 8, no. 10 (2017): 1072–1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233. Kolan S. S., Lidstrom T., Mediavilla T., et al., “Growth‐inhibition of Cell Lines Derived From B Cell Lymphomas Through Antagonism of Serotonin Receptor Signaling,” Scientific Reports 9, no. 1 (2019): 4276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234. Soll C., Riener M. O., Oberkofler C. E., et al., “Expression of Serotonin Receptors in human Hepatocellular Cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research 18, no. 21 (2012): 5902–5910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235. Sui H., Xu H., Ji Q., et al., “5‐hydroxytryptamine Receptor (5‐HT1DR) Promotes Colorectal Cancer Metastasis by Regulating Axin1/Beta‐catenin/MMP‐7 Signaling Pathway,” Oncotarget 6, no. 28 (2015): 25975–25987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236. Qin X., Li J., Wang S., et al., “Serotonin/HTR1E Signaling Blocks Chronic Stress‐promoted Progression of Ovarian Cancer,” Theranostics 11, no. 14 (2021): 6950–6965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237. Sreevidya C. S., Khaskhely N. M., Fukunaga A., Khaskina P., and Ullrich S E., “Inhibition of Photocarcinogenesis by Platelet‐activating Factor or Serotonin Receptor Antagonists,” Cancer Research 68, no. 10 (2008): 3978–3984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238. Liang C., Chen W., and Zhi X., “Serotonin Promotes the Proliferation of Serum‐deprived Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells via Upregulation of FOXO3a,” Molecular cancer 12, no. 1 (2013): 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239. Asada M., Ebihara S., Yamanda S., et al., “Depletion of Serotonin and Selective Inhibition of 2B Receptor Suppressed Tumor Angiogenesis by Inhibiting Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase and Extracellular Signal‐regulated Kinase 1/2 Phosphorylation,” Neoplasia 11, no. 4 (2009): 408–417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240. Liu S., Miao R., Zhai M., et al., “Effects and Related Mechanisms of Serotonin on Malignant Biological Behavior of Hepatocellular Carcinoma via Regulation of Yap,” Oncotarget 8, no. 29 (2017): 47412–47424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241. Jiang S. H., Li J., Dong F. Y., et al., “Increased Serotonin Signaling Contributes to the Warburg Effect in Pancreatic Tumor Cells under Metabolic Stress and Promotes Growth of Pancreatic Tumors in Mice,” Gastroenterology 153, no. 1 (2017): 277–291. e19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242. de las Casas‐Engel M., Dominguez‐Soto A., Sierra‐Filardi E., et al., “Serotonin Skews human Macrophage Polarization Through HTR2B and HTR7,” Journal of Immunology 190, no. 5 (2013): 2301–2310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243. Weidmann C., Berube J., Piquet L., de la Fouchardiere A., and Landreville S., “Expression of the Serotonin Receptor 2B in Uveal Melanoma and Effects of an Antagonist on Cell Lines,” Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 35, no. 3 (2018): 123–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244. Svejda B., Kidd M., Giovinazzo F., et al., “The 5‐HT(2B) Receptor Plays a Key Regulatory Role in both Neuroendocrine Tumor Cell Proliferation and the Modulation of the Fibroblast Component of the Neoplastic Microenvironment,” Cancer 116, no. 12 (2010): 2902–2912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245. Dizeyi N., Bjartell A., Hedlund P., Tasken K. A., Gadaleanu V., and Abrahamsson P A., “Expression of Serotonin Receptors 2B and 4 in human Prostate Cancer Tissue and Effects of Their Antagonists on Prostate Cancer Cell Lines,” European Urology 47, no. 6 (2005): 895–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246. Jaffré F., Callebert J., Sarre A., et al., “Involvement of the Serotonin 5‐HT2B Receptor in Cardiac Hypertrophy Linked to Sympathetic Stimulation: Control of Interleukin‐6, Interleukin‐1beta, and Tumor Necrosis Factor‐alpha Cytokine Production by Ventricular Fibroblasts,” Circulation 110, no. 8 (2004): 969–974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247. Lee J. S., Park S. Y., Kim N. Y., et al., “Anti‐Tumor Potential of a 5‐HT3 Receptor Antagonist as a Novel Autophagy Inducer in Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Clinical Study With in Vitro Confirmation,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 8, no. 9 (2019): 1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248. Merrouche Y., Catimel G., Rebattu P., et al., “A Phase I Antiemetic Study of MDL 73,147EF, a Novel 5‐hydroxytryptamine Antagonist in Cancer Patients Receiving Emetogenic Chemotherapy,” Annals of Oncology 5, no. 6 (1994): 549–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249. Mir O., Durand J. P., Boudou‐Rouquette P., et al., “Interaction Between Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, 5‐HT3 Antagonists, and NK1 Antagonists in Cancer Patients Receiving Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Case‐control Study,” Supportive Care in Cancer 20, no. 9 (2012): 2235–2239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250. Curtis J. J., Vo N. T. K., Seymour C. B., and Mothersill C E., “5‐HT(2A) and 5‐HT(3) Receptors Contribute to the Exacerbation of Targeted and Non‐targeted Effects of Ionizing Radiation‐induced Cell Death in human Colon Carcinoma Cells,” International Journal of Radiation Biology 96, no. 4 (2020): 482–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251. Ishizuka J., Hsieh A. C., Townsend C. M. Jr., and Thompson J. C., “Effect of 5‐HT3 Receptor Antagonist (ondansetron) on Functioning human Pancreatic Carcinoid Cells,” Surgical Oncology 2, no. 4 (1993): 221–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252. Qiao H., Wang Y. B., Gao Y. M., and Bi L L., “Prucalopride Inhibits the Glioma Cells Proliferation and Induces Autophagy via AKT‐mTOR Pathway,” BMC Neurology [Electronic Resource] 18, no. 1 (2018): 80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253. Nishikawa T., Tsuno N. H., Shuno Y., et al., “Antiangiogenic Effect of a Selective 5‐HT4 Receptor Agonist,” Journal of Surgical Research 159, no. 2 (2010): 696–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254. Lu Q., Ding Y., Li Y., and Lu Q., “5‐HT Receptor Agonist Valerenic Acid Enhances the Innate Immunity Signal and Suppresses Glioblastoma Cell Growth and Invasion,” International Journal of Biological Sciences 16, no. 12 (2020): 2104–2115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255. Fatima S., Shi X., Lin Z., et al., “5‐Hydroxytryptamine Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Proliferation by Influencing Beta‐catenin,” Molecular Oncology 10, no. 2 (2016): 195–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256. Svejda B., Kidd M., Timberlake A., et al., “Serotonin and the 5‐HT7 Receptor: The Link Between Hepatocytes, IGF‐1 and Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors,” Cancer Science 104, no. 7 (2013): 844–855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257. Cinar I., Sirin B., Halici Z., Palabiyik‐Yucelik S. S., Akpinar E., and Cadirci E., “5‐HT7 receptors as a New Target for Prostate Cancer Physiopathology and Treatment: An Experimental Study on PC‐3 Cells and FFPE Tissues,” Naunyn‐Schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology 394, no. 6 (2021): 1205–1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258. Gautam J., Banskota S., Regmi S. C., et al., “Tryptophan Hydroxylase 1 and 5‐HT(7) Receptor Preferentially Expressed in Triple‐negative Breast Cancer Promote Cancer Progression Through Autocrine Serotonin Signaling,” Molecular cancer 15, no. 1 (2016): 75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259. Lieb K., Biersack L., Waschbisch A., et al., “Serotonin via 5‐HT7 Receptors Activates p38 Mitogen‐activated Protein Kinase and Protein Kinase C Epsilon Resulting in Interleukin‐6 Synthesis in human U373 MG Astrocytoma Cells,” Journal of Neurochemistry 93, no. 3 (2005): 549–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260. Du X., Wang T., Wang Z., et al., “5‐HT(7) Receptor Contributes to Proliferation, Migration and Invasion in NSCLC Cells,” OncoTargets and Therapy 13 (2020): 2139–2151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261. Camilleri M., “LX‐1031, a Tryptophan 5‐hydroxylase Inhibitor That Reduces 5‐HT Levels for the Potential Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome,” Idrugs 13, no. 12 (2010): 921–928. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262. Ervin C. M. and Mangel A. W., “Clinical Trials in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Review,” Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials 8, no. 1 (2013): 9–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263. Brown P. M., Drossman D. A., Wood A. J., et al., “The Tryptophan Hydroxylase Inhibitor LX1031 Shows Clinical Benefit in Patients With Nonconstipating Irritable Bowel Syndrome,” Gastroenterology 141, no. 2 (2011): 507–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264. da Rocha M. J., Pires C. S., Presa M. H., et al., “Involvement of the Serotonergic System in the Antidepressant‐Like Effect of 1‐(phenylselanyl)‐2‐(p‐tolyl)indolizine in Mice,” Psychopharmacology 240, no. 2 (2023): 373–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265. Fu J., Yang Q. Y., Sai K., et al., “TGM2 inhibition Attenuates ID1 Expression in CD44‐high Glioma‐initiating Cells,” Neuro‐oncology 15, no. 10 (2013): 1353–1365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266. Figgitt D. P. and Fluvoxamine M. K., “An Updated Review of Its Use in the Management of Adults With Anxiety Disorders,” Drugs 60, no. 4 (2000): 925–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267. Vilazodone . Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®). National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268. Aghajani R., Tavalaee M., Sadeghi N., et al., “Paroxetine Treatment in an Animal Model of Depression Improves Sperm Quality,” PLoS ONE 17, no. 12 (2022): e0271217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269. Bourin M., Chue P., and Guillon Y., “Paroxetine: A Review,” CNS Drug Reviews 7, no. 1 (2001): 25–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270. Kumar R., Ali S. N., Saha S., and Bhattacharjee S., “SSRI Induced Hypnic Jerks: A Case Series,” Indian Journal of Psychiatry 65, no. 7 (2023): 785–788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271. Sharp T. and Collins H., “Mechanisms of SSRI Therapy and Discontinuation,” Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences 66 (2024): 21–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272. Crépeau‐Gendron G., Brown H. K., Shorey C., et al., “Association Between Citalopram, Escitalopram and QTc Prolongation in a Real‐world Geriatric Setting,” Journal of Affective Disorders 250 (2019): 341–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273. Smith P. F. and Darlington C. L., “A Possible Explanation for Dizziness Following SSRI Discontinuation,” Acta Oto‐Laryngologica 130, no. 9 (2010): 981–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274. Mortensen J. K. and Andersen G., “Safety Considerations for Prescribing SSRI Antidepressants to Patients at Increased Cardiovascular Risk,” Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 21, no. 4 (2022): 467–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275. Skalkidou A., Sundström‐Poromaa I., Wikman A., Hesselman S., Wikström A. K., and Elenis E., “SSRI Use During Pregnancy and Risk for Postpartum Haemorrhage: A National Register‐based Cohort Study in Sweden,” Bjog 127, no. 11 (2020): 1366–1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276. Brauch H., Mürdter T. E., Eichelbaum M., and Schwab M., “Pharmacogenomics of Tamoxifen Therapy,” Clinical Chemistry 55, no. 10 (2009): 1770–1782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277. Howland R. H., “MAOI Antidepressant Drugs,” Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services 44, no. 6 (2006): 9–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278. Van den Eynde V., Parker G., Ruhé H. G., et al., “On the Origins of MAOI Misconceptions: Reaffirming Their Role in Melancholic Depression,” Psychopharmacology Bulletin 53, no. 3 (2023): 35–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279. Sub Laban T. and Saadabadi A., “Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOI),” StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing. Copyright © 2025, StatPearls Publishing LLC., 2025). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280. Van den Eynde V., Abdelmoemin W. R., Abraham M. M., et al., “The Prescriber's Guide to Classic MAO Inhibitors (phenelzine, tranylcypromine, isocarboxazid) for Treatment‐resistant Depression,” CNS Spectrums 28, no. 4 (2023): 427–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281. Riederer P., Lachenmayer L., and Laux G., “Clinical Applications of MAO‐inhibitors,” Current Medicinal Chemistry 11, no. 15 (2004): 2033–2043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282. Bandelow B., Zohar J., Hollander E., Kasper S., and Möller H. J., “World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for the Pharmacological Treatment of Anxiety, Obsessive‐compulsive and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders,” The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry: The Official Journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry 3, no. 4 (2002): 171–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283. Grabowski Ł., “[Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI): Pharmacology, metabolism and application in the treatment of depression],” Postepy Biochemii 67, no. 2 (2021): 130–140. Inhibitory monoaminooksydazy (IMAO): farmakologia, metabolizm i zastosowanie w terapii depresji o różnej etiologii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284. Scotton W. J., Hill L. J., Williams A. C., and Barnes N. M., “Serotonin Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Clinical Features, Management, and Potential Future Directions,” International Journal of Tryptophan Research 12 (2019): 1178646919873925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285. Feighner J. P., Boyer W. F., Tyler D. L., and Neborsky R. J., “Adverse Consequences of Fluoxetine‐MAOI Combination Therapy,” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 51, no. 6 (1990): 222–225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286. Van den Eynde V., Gillman P. K., and Blackwell B. B., “The Prescriber's Guide to the MAOI Diet‐Thinking through Tyramine Troubles,” Psychopharmacology Bulletin 52, no. 2 (2022): 73–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287. Garcia E. and Santos C., “Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor Toxicity,” StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing. Copyright © 2025, StatPearls Publishing LLC., 2025). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288. Dilsaver S. C., “Heterocyclic Antidepressant, Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor and Neuroleptic Withdrawal Phenomena,” Progress in Neuro‐Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 14, no. 2 (1990): 137–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289. Vargas M. V., Dunlap L. E., Dong C., et al., “Psychedelics Promote Neuroplasticity Through the Activation of Intracellular 5‐HT2A Receptors,” Science 379, no. 6633 (2023): 700–706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290. Zięba A., Stępnicki P., Matosiuk D., and Kaczor A A., “Overcoming Depression With 5‐HT(2A) Receptor Ligands,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 1 (2021): 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291. Nichols D. E., “Psychedelics,” Pharmacological Reviews 68, no. 2 (2016): 264–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292. Preller K. H., Burt J. B., Ji J. L., et al., “Changes in Global and Thalamic Brain Connectivity in LSD‐induced Altered States of Consciousness Are Attributable to the 5‐HT2A Receptor,” Elife 7 (2018): e35082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293. Smith B. M., Smith J. M., Tsai J. H., et al., “Discovery and Structure‐activity Relationship of (1R)‐8‐chloro‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1‐methyl‐1H‐3‐benzazepine (Lorcaserin), a Selective Serotonin 5‐HT2C Receptor Agonist for the Treatment of Obesity,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 51, no. 2 (2008): 305–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294. Nguyen C. T., Zhou S., Shanahan W., and Fain R., “Lorcaserin in Obese and Overweight Patients Taking Prohibited Serotonergic Agents: A Retrospective Analysis,” Clinical Therapeutics 38, no. 6 (2016): 1498–1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295. Aznar S. and Hervig Mel S., “The 5‐HT2A Serotonin Receptor in Executive Function: Implications for Neuropsychiatric and Neurodegenerative Diseases,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 64 (2016): 63–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296. Olajossy‐Hilkesberger L., Godlewska B., Schosser‐Haupt A., et al., “Polymorphisms of the 5‐HT2A Receptor Gene and Clinical Response to Olanzapine in Paranoid Schizophrenia,” Neuropsychobiology 64, no. 4 (2011): 202–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297. Gaitonde S. A., Avet C., de la Fuente Revenga M., et al., “Pharmacological Fingerprint of Antipsychotic Drugs at the Serotonin 5‐HT(2A) Receptor,” Molecular Psychiatry 29, no. 9 (2024): 2753–2764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298. Hashizume H., Kawakami M., Yoshida M., Okada M., Enyo Y., and Inomata Y., “Sarpogrelate Hydrochloride, a 5‐HT2A Receptor Antagonist, Attenuates Neurogenic Pain Induced by Nucleus Pulposus in Rats,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32, no. 3 (2007): 315–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299. Nagatomo T., Rashid M., Muntasir H., Komiyama T., and Abul Muntasir H., “Functions of 5‐HT2A Receptor and Its Antagonists in the Cardiovascular System,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics 104, no. 1 (2004): 59–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300. Gozes Y., Moayeri M., Wiggins J. F., and Leppla S H., “Anthrax Lethal Toxin Induces Ketotifen‐sensitive Intradermal Vascular Leakage in Certain Inbred Mice,” Infection and Immunity 74, no. 2 (2006): 1266–1272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301. Idzko M., Panther E., Stratz C., et al., “The Serotoninergic Receptors of human Dendritic Cells: Identification and Coupling to Cytokine Release,” Journal of Immunology 172, no. 10 (2004): 6011–6019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302. Nieto C., Rayo I., de L., et al., “Serotonin (5‐HT) Shapes the Macrophage Gene Profile Through the 5‐HT(2B)‐Dependent Activation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor,” Journal of Immunology 204, no. 10 (2020): 2808–2817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303. Thompson A. J. and Lummis S C., “The 5‐HT3 Receptor as a Therapeutic Target,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets 11, no. 4 (2007): 527–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304. Machu T K., “Therapeutics of 5‐HT3 Receptor Antagonists: Current Uses and Future Directions,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics 130, no. 3 (2011): 338–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305. Fakhfouri G., Rahimian R., Ghia J. E., Khan W. I., and Dehpour A R., “Impact of 5‐HT3 Receptor Antagonists on Peripheral and central Diseases,” Drug Discovery Today 17, no. 13‐14 (2012): 741–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306. Gan T. J., Belani K. G., Bergese S., et al., “Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting,” Anesthesia and Analgesia 131, no. 2 (2020): 411–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307. Gupta K., Walton R., and Kataria S P., “Chemotherapy‐Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Pathogenesis, Recommendations, and New Trends,” Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 26 (2021): 100278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308. Butt I. and Kasmin F., “Alosetron,” StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2025, StatPearls Publishing LLC., 2025). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309. Li C. J., Zhang L. G., Liu L. B., et al., “Inhibition of Spinal 5‐HT3 Receptor and Spinal Dorsal Horn Neuronal Excitability Alleviates Hyperalgesia in a Rat Model of Parkinson's Disease,” Molecular Neurobiology 59, no. 12 (2022): 7253–7264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310. Eissazade N., Mosavari H., Eghdami S., Boroon M., Ashrafi F., and Shalbafan M., “Efficacy and Safety of 5‐hydroxytryptamine‐3 (5‐HT3) Receptor Antagonists in Augmentation With Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Obsessive‐compulsive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials,” Scientific Reports 13, no. 1 (2023): 20837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311. Khan N. A. and Poisson J P., “5‐HT3 receptor‐channels Coupled With Na+ Influx in human T Cells: Role in T Cell Activation,” Journal of Neuroimmunology 99, no. 1 (1999): 53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 312. Ailani J., Burch R. C., and Robbins M S., “The American Headache Society Consensus Statement: Update on Integrating New Migraine Treatments Into Clinical Practice,” Headache 61, no. 7 (2021): 1021–1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313. Zhu C. P., Liu S. Q., Wang K. Q., et al., “Targeting 5‐Hydroxytryptamine Receptor 1A in the Portal Vein to Decrease Portal Hypertension,” Gastroenterology 167, no. 5 (2024): 993–1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 314. Staroń J., Bugno R., Hogendorf A. S., and Bojarski A J., “5‐HT1A receptor Ligands and Their Therapeutic Applications: Review of New Patents,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 28, no. 9 (2018): 679–689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315. Kaur Gill A., Bansal Y., Bhandari R., et al., “Gepirone Hydrochloride: A Novel Antidepressant With 5‐HT1A Agonistic Properties,” Drugs of Today (Barcelona, Spain: 1998) 55, no. 7 (2019): 423–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 316. Dawson L. A. and Watson J M., “Vilazodone: A 5‐HT1A Receptor Agonist/Serotonin Transporter Inhibitor for the Treatment of Affective Disorders,” CNS neuroscience & therapeutics 15, no. 2 (2009): 107–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 317. Sahli Z. T., Banerjee P., and Tarazi F I., “The Preclinical and Clinical Effects of Vilazodone for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder,” Expert Opin Drug Discov 11, no. 5 (2016): 515–523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 318. Bozkurt N. M. and Unal G., “Vortioxetine Improved Negative and Cognitive Symptoms of Schizophrenia in Subchronic MK‐801 Model in Rats,” Behavioural Brain Research 444 (2023): 114365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 319. Nikolaus S., Wittsack H. J., Beu M., et al., “The 5‐HT(1A) Receptor Antagonist WAY‐100635 Decreases Motor/Exploratory Behaviors and Nigrostriatal and Mesolimbocortical Dopamine D(2/3) Receptor Binding in Adult Rats,” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 215 (2022): 173363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 320. Diener H. C. and May A., “Drug Treatment of Cluster Headache,” Drugs 82, no. 1 (2022): 33–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 321. Pauwels P. J. and John G W., “Present and Future of 5‐HT Receptor Agonists as Antimigraine Drugs,” Clinical Neuropharmacology 22, no. 3 (1999): 123–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322. Cameron C., Kelly S., Hsieh S. C., et al., “Triptans in the Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis,” Headache 55, no. Suppl 4 (2015): 221–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 323. Tanaka M., Török N., and Vécsei L., “Are 5‐HT(1) Receptor Agonists Effective Anti‐migraine Drugs?” Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 22, no. 10 (2021): 1221–1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 324. Xue D., Guo X., Liu J., et al., “Tryptophan‐rich Diet and Its Effects on Htr7(+) Tregs in Alleviating Neuroinflammation and Cognitive Impairment Induced by Lipopolysaccharide,” Journal of Neuroinflammation 21, no. 1 (2024): 241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 325. Lamb Y N., “Lasmiditan: First Approval,” Drugs 79, no. 18 (2019): 1989–1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 326. Ataee R., Ajdary S., Zarrindast M., Rezayat M., and Hayatbakhsh M R., “Anti‐mitogenic and Apoptotic Effects of 5‐HT1B Receptor Antagonist on HT29 Colorectal Cancer Cell Line,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 136, no. 10 (2010): 1461–1469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 327. Hagena H. and Manahan‐Vaughan D., “The Serotonergic 5‐HT4 Receptor: A Unique Modulator of Hippocampal Synaptic Information Processing and Cognition,” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 138 (2017): 145–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 328. Serotonin 5‐HT4 Receptor Agonists . LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug‐Induced Liver Injury. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 329. Hasler W. L. and Schoenfeld P., “Safety Profile of tegaserod, a 5‐HT4 Receptor Agonist, for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome,” Drug Safety 27, no. 9 (2004): 619–631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 330. Hwang S. J., Wang J. H., Lee J. S., et al., “Yeokwisan, a Standardized Herbal Formula, Enhances Gastric Emptying via Modulation of the Ghrelin Pathway in a Loperamide‐induced Functional Dyspepsia Mouse Model,” Frontiers in pharmacology 12 (2021): 753153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 331. Conlon K., De Maeyer J. H., Bruce C., et al., “Nonclinical Cardiovascular Studies of Prucalopride, a Highly Selective 5‐Hydroxytryptamine 4 Receptor Agonist,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 364, no. 2 (2018): 156–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 332. Darcet F., Gardier A. M., David D. J., and Guilloux J P., “Chronic 5‐HT4 Receptor Agonist Treatment Restores Learning and Memory Deficits in a Neuroendocrine Mouse Model of Anxiety/Depression,” Neuroscience Letters 616 (2016): 197–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333. Kozono N., Ohtani A., and Shiga T., “Roles of the Serotonin 5‐HT4 Receptor in Dendrite Formation of the Rat Hippocampal Neurons in Vitro,” Brain Research 1655 (2017): 114–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 334. Dam V. H., Köhler‐Forsberg K., Ozenne B., et al., “Effect of Antidepressant Treatment on 5‐HT(4) Receptor Binding and Associations with Clinical Outcomes and Verbal Memory in Major Depressive Disorder,” Biological Psychiatry 97, no. 3 (2025): 261–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335. Yamazaki M., Yamamoto N., Yarimizu J., et al., “Functional Mechanism of ASP5736, a Selective Serotonin 5‐HT(5A) Receptor Antagonist With Potential Utility for the Treatment of Cognitive Dysfunction in Schizophrenia,” European Neuropsychopharmacology 28, no. 5 (2018): 620–629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 336. Lalut J., Karila D., Dallemagne P., and Rochais C., “Modulating 5‐HT(4) and 5‐HT(6) Receptors in Alzheimer's Disease Treatment,” Future Medicinal Chemistry 9, no. 8 (2017): 781–795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 337. Khoury R., Grysman N., Gold J., Patel K., and Grossberg G T., “The Role of 5 HT6‐receptor Antagonists in Alzheimer's Disease: An Update,” Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 27, no. 6 (2018): 523–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 338. Nirogi R., Abraham R., Benade V., et al., “SUVN‐502, a Novel, Potent, Pure, and Orally Active 5‐HT6 Receptor Antagonist: Pharmacological, Behavioral, and Neurochemical Characterization,” Behavioural Pharmacology 30, no. 1 (2019): 16–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 339. Nirogi R., Jayarajan P., Shinde A., et al., “Progress in Investigational Agents Targeting Serotonin‐6 Receptors for the Treatment of Brain Disorders,” Biomolecules 13, no. 2 (2023): 309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 340. Meneses A., Perez‐Garcia G., Liy‐Salmeron G., Ponce‐López T., Lacivita E., and Leopoldo M., “5‐HT7 receptor Activation: Procognitive and Antiamnesic Effects,” Psychopharmacology 232, no. 3 (2015): 595–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 341. Leon‐Ponte M., Ahern G. P., and O'Connell P. J., “Serotonin Provides an Accessory Signal to Enhance T‐cell Activation by Signaling Through the 5‐HT7 Receptor,” Blood 109, no. 8 (2007): 3139–3146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 342. Mnie‐Filali O., Lambás‐Señas L., Zimmer L., and Haddjeri N., “5‐HT7 receptor Antagonists as a New Class of Antidepressants,” Drug News & Perspectives 20, no. 10 (2007): 613–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 343. Sahin B., Ozdemir E., Gumus E., Ergul M., and Taskiran A S., “The 5‐HT7 Receptor Antagonist SB‐269970 Alleviates Seizure Activity and Downregulates Hippocampal c‐Fos Expression in Pentylenetetrazole‐induced Kindled Rats,” Neurological Research 44, no. 9 (2022): 786–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 344. Hedlund P. B., Huitron‐Resendiz S., Henriksen S. J., and Sutcliffe J G., “5‐HT7 receptor Inhibition and Inactivation Induce Antidepressantlike Behavior and Sleep Pattern,” Biological Psychiatry 58, no. 10 (2005): 831–837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 345. Padelli M., Bruno C., Lemarchand J., et al., “[Determination of thresholds values for platelet serotonin and urinary 5‐HIAA concentrations for the biological diagnosis of digestive neuroendocrine tumors],” Annales de Biologie Clinique (Paris) 77, no. 2 (2019): 161–168. Quelles valeurs de référence pour la concentration de la sérotonine plaquettaire et du 5‐HIAA urinaire pour le diagnostic des tumeurs neuroendocrines digestives ?. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 346. Ye D., Xu H., Tang Q., Xia H., Zhang C., and Bi F., “The Role of 5‐HT Metabolism in Cancer,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) ‐ Reviews on Cancer 1876, no. 2 (2021): 188618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 347. Karmakar S. and Lal G., “Role of Serotonin Receptor Signaling in Cancer Cells and Anti‐tumor Immunity,” Theranostics 11, no. 11 (2021): 5296–5312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 348. Chiechi A., Novello C., Magagnoli G., et al., “Elevated TNFR1 and Serotonin in Bone Metastasis Are Correlated With Poor Survival Following Bone Metastasis Diagnosis for both Carcinoma and Sarcoma Primary Tumors,” Clinical Cancer Research 19, no. 9 (2013): 2473–2485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 349. Casar‐Borota O., Botling J., Granberg D., et al., “Serotonin, ATRX, and DAXX Expression in Pituitary Adenomas: Markers in the Differential Diagnosis of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Sellar Region,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology 41, no. 9 (2017): 1238–1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 350. Nocito A., Dahm F., Jochum W., et al., “Serotonin Regulates Macrophage‐mediated Angiogenesis in a Mouse Model of Colon Cancer Allografts,” Cancer Research 68, no. 13 (2008): 5152–5158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 351. Sakita J. Y., Bader M., Santos E. S., et al., “Serotonin Synthesis Protects the Mouse Colonic Crypt From DNA Damage and Colorectal Tumorigenesis,” Journal of Pathology 249, no. 1 (2019): 102–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 352. Li T., Fu B., Zhang X., et al., “Overproduction of Gastrointestinal 5‐HT Promotes Colitis‐Associated Colorectal Cancer Progression via Enhancing NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation,” Cancer immunology research 9, no. 9 (2021): 1008–1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 353. Depoilly T., Leroux R., Andrade D., et al., “Immunophenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Producing Serotonin,” Modern Pathology 35, no. 11 (2022): 1713–1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 354. Fischer A., Rennert H. S., and Rennert G., “Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Associated With Increased Mortality Risk in Breast Cancer Patients in Northern Israel,” International Journal of Epidemiology 51, no. 3 (2022): 807–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 355. Wesmiller S. W., Bender C. M., Sereika S. M., et al., “Association Between Serotonin Transport Polymorphisms and Postdischarge Nausea and Vomiting in Women Following Breast Cancer Surgery,” Oncology Nursing Forum 41, no. 2 (2014): 195–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 356. Gärtner R., Cronin‐Fenton D., Hundborg H. H., et al., “Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Risk of Re‐operation due to Post‐surgical Bleeding in Breast Cancer Patients: A Danish Population‐based Cohort Study,” BMC Surgery [Electronic Resource] 10 (2010): 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 357. Grassi L., Rossi E., Cobianchi M., et al., “Depression and Serotonin Transporter (5‐HTTLPR) Polymorphism in Breast Cancer Patients,” Journal of Affective Disorders 124, no. 3 (2010): 346–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 358. Ling T., Dai Z., Wang H., et al., “Serotonylation in Tumor‐associated Fibroblasts Contributes to the Tumor‐promoting Roles of Serotonin in Colorectal Cancer,” Cancer Letters 600 (2024): 217150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 359. Yu H., Qu T., Yang J., and Dai Q., “Serotonin Acts Through YAP to Promote Cell Proliferation: Mechanism and Implication in Colorectal Cancer Progression,” Cell Communication and Signaling 21, no. 1 (2023): 75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 360. Zhu P., Lu T., Chen Z., et al., “5‐hydroxytryptamine Produced by Enteric Serotonergic Neurons Initiates Colorectal Cancer Stem Cell Self‐renewal and Tumorigenesis,” Neuron 110, no. 14 (2022): 2268–2282. e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 361. Mamdouh F., Abdel Alem S., and Abdo M., “Serum Serotonin as a Potential Diagnostic Marker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research 39, no. 12 (2019): 780–785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 362. Iwase R., Shiba H., Gocho T., et al., “Syndrome of Inappropriate Secretion of Antidiuretic Hormone Due to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater: Case Report,” International Surgery 98, no. 4 (2013): 289–291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 363. Serafeim A., Grafton G., Chamba A., et al., “5‐Hydroxytryptamine Drives Apoptosis in Biopsylike Burkitt Lymphoma Cells: Reversal by Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors,” Blood 99, no. 7 (2002): 2545–2553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 364. Liu K., Zhang Y., Du G., et al., “5‐HT Orchestrates Histone Serotonylation and Citrullination to Drive Neutrophil Extracellular Traps and Liver Metastasis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 135, no. 8 (2025): e183544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 365. Tang D G., “Serotonin Sets up Neutrophil Extracellular Traps to Promote Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer Metastasis in the Liver,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 135, no. 8 (2025): e191687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 366. Yin L., Li J., Wang J., et al., “MAOA Promotes Prostate Cancer Cell Perineural Invasion Through SEMA3C/PlexinA2/NRP1‐cMET Signaling,” Oncogene 40, no. 7 (2021): 1362–1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 367. Yang X. G., Li Y. Y., Zhao D. X., et al., “Repurposing of a Monoamine Oxidase A Inhibitor‑Heptamethine Carbocyanine Dye Conjugate for Paclitaxel‑Resistant Non‑Small Cell Lung Cancer,” Oncology Reports 45, no. 3 (2021): 1306–1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 368. Huang B., Zhou Z., Liu J., et al., “The Role of Monoamine Oxidase A in HPV‐16 E7‐induced Epithelial‐mesenchymal Transition and HIF‐1alpha Protein Accumulation in Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer Cells,” International Journal of Biological Sciences 16, no. 14 (2020): 2692–2703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 369. Chen V. C., Lee M. J., Yang Y. H., Lu M. L., Chiu W. C., and Dewey M E., “Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Use and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence 219 (2021): 108495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 370. Zhang N., Sundquist J., Sundquist K., Zhang Z. G., and Ji J., “Combined Use of Aspirin and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Is Associated with Lower Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Nested Case‐Control Study,” American Journal of Gastroenterology 116, no. 6 (2021): 1313–1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 371. Kannen V., Hintzsche H., Zanette D. L., et al., “Antiproliferative Effects of Fluoxetine on Colon Cancer Cells and in a Colonic Carcinogen Mouse Model,” PLoS ONE 7, no. 11 (2012): e50043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 372. Kannen V., Garcia S. B., and Silva W. A. Jr., “Oncostatic Effects of Fluoxetine in Experimental Colon Cancer Models,” Cell Signalling 27, no. 9 (2015): 1781–1788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 373. Grygier B., Arteta B., Kubera M., et al., “Inhibitory Effect of Antidepressants on B16F10 Melanoma Tumor Growth,” Pharmacology Reports 65, no. 3 (2013): 672–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 374. Di Rosso M. E., Sterle H. A., Cremaschi G. A., and Genaro A M., “Beneficial Effect of Fluoxetine and Sertraline on Chronic Stress‐Induced Tumor Growth and Cell Dissemination in a Mouse Model of Lymphoma: Crucial Role of Antitumor Immunity,” Frontiers in immunology 9 (2018): 1341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 375. Li J., Mei B., Feng L., et al., “Amitriptyline Revitalizes ICB Response via Dually Inhibiting Kyn/Indole and 5‐HT Pathways of Tryptophan Metabolism in Ovarian Cancer,” Iscience 27, no. 12 (2024): 111488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 376. Li J., Pu T., Yin L., Li Q., Liao C. P., and Wu B J., “MAOA‐mediated Reprogramming of Stromal Fibroblasts Promotes Prostate Tumorigenesis and Cancer Stemness,” Oncogene 39, no. 16 (2020): 3305–3321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 377. Wei J., Yin L., Li J., et al., “Bidirectional Cross‐talk Between MAOA and AR Promotes Hormone‐Dependent and Castration‐Resistant Prostate Cancer,” Cancer Research 81, no. 16 (2021): 4275–4289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 378. Gurbuz N., Ashour A. A., Alpay S. N., and Ozpolat B., “Down‐regulation of 5‐HT1B and 5‐HT1D Receptors Inhibits Proliferation, Clonogenicity and Invasion of human Pancreatic Cancer Cells,” PLoS ONE 9, no. 8 (2014): e105245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 379. Liu Y., Zhang H., Wang Z., Wu P., and Gong W., “5‐Hydroxytryptamine1a receptors on Tumour Cells Induce Immune Evasion in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients With Depression via Autophagy/pSTAT3,” European Journal of Cancer 114 (2019): 8–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 380. Zuo X., Chen Z., Cai J., et al., “5‐Hydroxytryptamine Receptor 1D Aggravates Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression through FoxO6 in AKT‐Dependent and Independent Manners,” Hepatology 69, no. 5 (2019): 2031–2047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 381. Mao L., Xin F., Ren J., et al., “5‐HT2B‐mediated Serotonin Activation in Enterocytes Suppresses Colitis‐associated Cancer Initiation and Promotes Cancer Progression,” Theranostics 12, no. 8 (2022): 3928–3945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 382. Abedini F., Amjadi O., Hedayatizadeh‐Omran A., Lira S. A., and Ahangari G., “Serotonin Receptors and Acetylcholinesterase Gene Expression Alternations: The Potential Value on Tumor Microenvironment of Gastric Cancer,” Oncology 101, no. 7 (2023): 415–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 383. Drozdov I., Kidd M., Gustafsson B. I., et al., “Autoregulatory Effects of Serotonin on Proliferation and Signaling Pathways in Lung and Small Intestine Neuroendocrine Tumor Cell Lines,” Cancer 115, no. 21 (2009): 4934–4945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 384. Oufkir T. and Vaillancourt C., “Phosphorylation of JAK2 by Serotonin 5‐HT (2A) Receptor Activates both STAT3 and ERK1/2 Pathways and Increases Growth of JEG‐3 human Placental Choriocarcinoma Cell,” Placenta 32, no. 12 (2011): 1033–1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 385. Tang J., Wang Z., Liu J., Zhou C., and Chen J., “Downregulation of 5‐hydroxytryptamine Receptor 3A Expression Exerts an Anticancer Activity Against Cell Growth in Colorectal Carcinoma Cells in Vitro,” Oncology letters 16, no. 5 (2018): 6100–6108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 386. Huang G. W., Chen Q. Q., Ma C. C., Xie L. H., and Gu J., “linc01305 promotes Metastasis and Proliferation of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Through Interacting With IGF2BP2 and IGF2BP3 to Stabilize HTR3A mRNA,” International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 136 (2021): 106015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 387. Stewart A., Davies P. A., Kirkness E. F., Safa P., and Hales T G., “Introduction of the 5‐HT3B Subunit Alters the Functional Properties of 5‐HT3 Receptors Native to Neuroblastoma Cells,” Neuropharmacology 44, no. 2 (2003): 214–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 388. Barzegar‐Fallah A., Alimoradi H., Dunlop J. L., Torbati E., and Baird S K., “Serotonin Type‐3 Receptor Antagonists Selectively Kill Melanoma Cells Through Classical Apoptosis, Microtubule Depolymerisation, ERK Activation, and NF‐κB Downregulation,” Cell Biology and Toxicology (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 389. Chen J. R., Huang M. S., Lee Y. C., Lin M. H., and Yang Y F., “Potential Clinical Value of 5‐Hydroxytryptamine Receptor 3C as a Prognostic Biomarker for Lung Cancer,” Journal of oncology 2021 (2021): 1901191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 390. Itsumi M., Shiota M., Sekino Y., et al., “High‐throughput Screen Identifies 5‐HT Receptor as a Modulator of AR and a Therapeutic Target for Prostate Cancer,” Prostate 80, no. 11 (2020): 885–894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 391. Louiset E., Isvi K., Gasc J. M., et al., “Ectopic Expression of serotonin7 Receptors in an Adrenocortical Carcinoma co‐secreting Renin and Cortisol,” Endocrine‐Related Cancer 15, no. 4 (2008): 1025–1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 392. Hejazi S. H., Ahangari G., Pornour M., et al., “Evaluation of Gene Expression Changes of Serotonin Receptors, 5‐HT3AR and 5‐HT2AR as Main Stress Factors in Breast Cancer Patients,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 15, no. 11 (2014): 4455–4458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 393. Kubera M., Maes M., Kenis G., Kim Y. K., and Lasoń W., “Effects of Serotonin and Serotonergic Agonists and Antagonists on the Production of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha and Interleukin‐6,” Psychiatry Research 134, no. 3 (2005): 251–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 394. Yu B., Becnel J., Zerfaoui M., Rohatgi R., Boulares A. H., and Nichols C D., “Serotonin 5‐hydroxytryptamine(2A) Receptor Activation Suppresses Tumor Necrosis Factor‐alpha‐induced Inflammation With Extraordinary Potency,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 327, no. 2 (2008): 316–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 395. Shu B., Zhai M., Miao X., et al., “Serotonin and YAP/VGLL4 Balance Correlated With Progression and Poor Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” Scientific Reports 8, no. 1 (2018): 9739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 396. Liu S., Zhai M., and Xiao W., “Intra‐platelet Serotonin and YAP Contributed to Poor Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” Life Sciences 270 (2021): 119140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 397. Kopparapu P. K., Tinzl M., Anagnostaki L., Persson J. L., and Dizeyi N., “Expression and Localization of Serotonin Receptors in human Breast Cancer,” Anticancer Research 33, no. 2 (2013): 363–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 398. Soll C., Jang J. H., Riener M. O., et al., “Serotonin Promotes Tumor Growth in human Hepatocellular Cancer,” Hepatology 51, no. 4 (2010): 1244–1254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 399. Xiao G G., “Targeting Serotonin System in Pancreatic Cancer,” Pancreas 49, no. 1 (2020): e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 400. Le‐Bel G., Benhassine M., Landreville S., and Guerin S L., “Analysis of the Proteasome Activity and the Turnover of the Serotonin Receptor 2B (HTR2B) in human Uveal Melanoma,” Experimental Eye Research 184 (2019): 72–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 401. Li T., Wei L., Zhang X., et al., “Serotonin Receptor HTR2B Facilitates Colorectal Cancer Metastasis via CREB1‐ZEB1 Axis‐Mediated Epithelial‐Mesenchymal Transition,” Molecular Cancer Research 22, no. 6 (2024): 538–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 402. Peters M. A. M., Meijer C., Fehrmann R. S. N., et al., “Serotonin and Dopamine Receptor Expression in Solid Tumours Including Rare Cancers,” Pathology Oncology Research 26, no. 3 (2020): 1539–1547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 403. Hejazi S. H., Ahangari G., and Deezagi A., “Alternative Viewpoint against Breast Cancer Based on Selective Serotonin Receptors 5HTR3A and 5HTR2A Antagonists That Can Mediate Apoptosis in MCF‐7 Cell Line,” Current Drug Discovery Technologies 12, no. 4 (2015): 240–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 404. Sonier B., Arseneault M., Lavigne C., Ouellette R. J., and Vaillancourt C., “The 5‐HT2A Serotoninergic Receptor Is Expressed in the MCF‐7 human Breast Cancer Cell Line and Reveals a Mitogenic Effect of Serotonin,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 343, no. 4 (2006): 1053–1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 405. Ambrosio M. R., Magli E., Caliendo G., et al., “Serotoninergic Receptor Ligands Improve Tamoxifen Effectiveness on Breast Cancer Cells,” BMC cancer 22, no. 1 (2022): 171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 406. Ren Y., Bao G., Yang H., Cao Z., Shao Z., and Zhang Y., “Ethiadin Induces Apoptosis and Suppresses Growth of MCF‐7 Breast Cancer Cells by Regulating the Phosphorylation of Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 Beta (GSK3beta),” Discovery Medicine 33, no. 169 (2022): 55–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 407. Xie Q. E., Du X., Wang M., et al., “Identification of Serotonin as a Predictive Marker for Breast Cancer Patients,” International Journal of General Medicine 14 (2021): 1939–1948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 408. Muller K., Gilbertz K. P., and Meineke V., “Serotonin and Ionizing Radiation Synergistically Affect Proliferation and Adhesion Molecule Expression of Malignant Melanoma Cells,” Journal of Dermatological Science 68, no. 2 (2012): 89–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 409. Eisenberg P., Figueroa‐Vadillo J., Zamora R., et al., “Improved Prevention of Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy‐induced Nausea and Vomiting With palonosetron, a Pharmacologically Novel 5‐HT3 Receptor Antagonist: Results of a Phase III, Single‐dose Trial versus dolasetron,” Cancer 98, no. 11 (2003): 2473–2482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 410. Nitta Y., Nishibori M., Iwagaki H., et al., “Changes in Serotonin Dynamics in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Colon‐26 Tumour‐bearing Mice: Effects of Cisplatin Treatment,” Naunyn‐Schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology 364, no. 4 (2001): 329–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 411. Olfati Z., Rigi G., Vaseghi H., Zamanzadeh Z., Sohrabi M., and Hejazi S H., “Evaluation of Serotonin Receptors (5HTR2A and 5HTR3A) mRNA Expression Changes in Tumor of Breast Cancer Patients,” Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran 34 (2020): 99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 412. Ataee R., Ajdary S., Rezayat M., Shokrgozar M. A., Shahriari S., and Zarrindast M R., “Study of 5HT3 and HT4 Receptor Expression in HT29 Cell Line and human Colon Adenocarcinoma Tissues,” Archives of Iranian Medicine 13, no. 2 (2010): 120–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 413. El‐Salhy M. and Dennerqvist V., “Effects of Triple Therapy With Octreotide, Galanin and Serotonin on Liver Metastasis of human Colon Cancer in Xenografts,” Oncology Reports 11, no. 6 (2004): 117711–117782. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 414. Jun J. H., Oh J. E., Shim J. K., Kwak Y. L., and Cho J S., “Effects of Bisphenol A on the Proliferation, Migration, and Tumor Growth of Colon Cancer Cells: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation With Mechanistic Insights Related to ERK and 5‐HT3,” Food and Chemical Toxicology 158 (2021): 112662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 415. Del Bello F., Bonifazi A., Giorgioni G., et al., “Chemical Manipulations on the 1,4‐dioxane Ring of 5‐HT(1A) Receptor Agonists Lead to Antagonists Endowed With Antitumor Activity in Prostate Cancer Cells,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 168 (2019): 461–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 416. Siddiqui E. J., Shabbir M., Mikhailidis D. P., Thompson C. S., and Mumtaz F H., “The Role of Serotonin (5‐hydroxytryptamine1A and 1B) Receptors in Prostate Cancer Cell Proliferation,” Journal of Urology 176, no. 4 Pt 1 (2006): 1648–1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 417. Henriksen R., Dizeyi N., and Abrahamsson P A., “Expression of Serotonin Receptors 5‐HT1A, 5‐HT1B, 5‐HT2B and 5‐HT4 in Ovary and in Ovarian Tumours,” Anticancer Research 32, no. 4 (2012): 1361–1366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 418. Siddiqui E. J., Shabbir M. A., Mikhailidis D. P., Mumtaz F. H., and Thompson C S., “The Effect of Serotonin and Serotonin Antagonists on Bladder Cancer Cell Proliferation,” Bju International 97, no. 3 (2006): 634–639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 419. Cattaneo M. G., Palazzi E., Bondiolotti G., and Vicentini L M., “5‐HT1D receptor Type Is Involved in Stimulation of Cell Proliferation by Serotonin in human Small Cell Lung Carcinoma,” European Journal of Pharmacology 268, no. 3 (1994): 425–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 420. Abdel‐Hamid N. M., Shehata D. E., Abdel‐Ghany A. A., Ragaa A., and Wahid A., “Serum Serotonin as Unexpected Potential Marker for Staging of Experimental Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 83 (2016): 407–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 421. Niture S., Gyamfi M. A., Kedir H., et al., “Serotonin Induced Hepatic Steatosis Is Associated With Modulation of Autophagy and Notch Signaling Pathway,” Cell Communication and Signaling 16, no. 1 (2018): 78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 422. Yagaloff K. A., Lozano G., Dyke T. V., Levine A. J., and Hartig P R., “Serotonin 5‐{HTlc} Receptors Are Expressed at High Density on Choroid Plexus Tumors From Transgenic Mice,” Brain Research (1986): 6–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 423. Contesse V., Reznik Y., Duparc C., et al., “Effects of Serotonin and Vasopressin on Cortisol Production From an Adrenocortical Tumor Causing Subclinical Cushing's Syndrome,” Endocrine Research 28, no. 4 (2002): 787–791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 424. Nakamura Y., Ise K., Yamazaki Y., Fujishima F., McNamara K. M., and Sasano H., “Serotonin Receptor 4 (5‐hydroxytryptamine receptor Type 4) Regulates Expression of Estrogen Receptor Beta and Cell Migration in Hormone‐naive Prostate Cancer,” Indian Journal of Pathology & Microbiology 60, no. 1 (2017): 33–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 425. Cınar V., Hamurcu Z., Guler A., Nurdinov N., and Ozpolat B., “Serotonin 5‐HT7 Receptor Is a Biomarker Poor Prognostic Factor and Induces Proliferation of Triple‐negative Breast Cancer Cells Through FOXM1,” Breast Cancer (Tokyo, Japan) 29, no. 6 (2022): 1106–1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 426. Mahe C., Bernhard M., Bobirnac I., et al., “Functional Expression of the Serotonin 5‐HT7 Receptor in human Glioblastoma Cell Lines,” British Journal of Pharmacology 143, no. 3 (2004): 404–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 427. Pai V. P., Marshall A. M., Hernandez L. L., Buckley A. R., and Horseman N D., “Altered Serotonin Physiology in human Breast Cancers Favors Paradoxical Growth and Cell Survival,” Breast Cancer Research 11, no. 6 (2009): R81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 428. Al Saedi A., Sharma S., and Bani Hassan E., “Characterization of Skeletal Phenotype and Associated Mechanisms with Chronic Intestinal Inflammation in the Winnie Mouse Model of Spontaneous Chronic Colitis,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 28, no. 2 (2022): 259–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 429. Shajib M. S., Chauhan U., Adeeb S., et al., “Characterization of Serotonin Signaling Components in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease,” Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology 2, no. 3 (2019): 132–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 430. Jørandli J. W., Thorsvik S., Skovdahl H. K., et al., “The Serotonin Reuptake Transporter Is Reduced in the Epithelium of Active Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis,” American journal of physiology Gastrointestinal and liver physiology 319, no. 6 (2020): G761–G768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 431. Perez F., Kotecha N., Lavoie B., Mawe G. M., and Patel B A., “Monitoring Gut Epithelium Serotonin and Melatonin Overflow Provides Spatial Mapping of Inflammation,” Chembiochem 24, no. 2 (2023): e202200334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 432. Kwon Y. H., Wang H., Denou E., et al., “Modulation of Gut Microbiota Composition by Serotonin Signaling Influences Intestinal Immune Response and Susceptibility to Colitis,” Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology 7, no. 4 (2019): 709–728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 433. Hizay A., Dag K., Oz N., et al., “Lactobacillus Acidophilus Regulates Abnormal Serotonin Availability in Experimental Ulcerative Colitis,” Anaerobe 80 (2023): 102710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 434. González Delgado S., Garza‐Veloz I., Trejo‐Vazquez F., and Martinez‐Fierro M. L., “Interplay Between Serotonin, Immune Response, and Intestinal Dysbiosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 24 (2022): 15632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 435. Tomita T., Fukui H., Morishita D., et al., “Efficacy of Serotonin Type 3 Receptor Antagonist Ramosetron on Diarrhea‐Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS‐D)‐Like Symptoms in Patients With Quiescent Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 23 (2022): 6882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 436. Kwon Y. H., Blass B. E., Wang H., et al., “Novel 5‐HT(7) Receptor Antagonists Modulate Intestinal Immune Responses and Reduce Severity of Colitis,” American journal of physiology Gastrointestinal and liver physiology 327, no. 1 (2024): G57–G69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 437. Barth M., Serre V., Hubert L., et al., “Kinetic Analyses Guide the Therapeutic Decision in a Novel Form of Moderate Aromatic Acid Decarboxylase Deficiency,” JIMD reports 3 (2012): 25–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 438. Yang L., Cai H., Tou J., et al., “The Role of the 5‐hydroxytryptamine Pathway in Reflux‐induced Esophageal Mucosal Injury in Rats,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology 10 (2012): 219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 439. Saegusa Y., Takeda H., Muto S., et al., “Decreased Motility of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter in a Rat Model of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease May be Mediated by Reductions of Serotonin and Acetylcholine Signaling,” Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin 34, no. 5 (2011): 704–711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 440. Ford A. C., Sperber A. D., Corsetti M., and Camilleri M., “Irritable Bowel Syndrome,” Lancet 396, no. 10263 (2020): 1675–1688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 441. Margolis K. G., Cryan J. F., and Mayer E A., “The Microbiota‐Gut‐Brain Axis: From Motility to Mood,” Gastroenterology 160, no. 5 (2021): 1486–1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 442. Sikander A., Rana S. V., Sinha S. K., Prasad K. K., and Arora S K., “Association of Serotonin Transporter Promoter Polymorphism (5‐HTTLPR) With Orocecal Transit Time in Irritable Bowel Syndrome,” Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 41, no. 6 (2022): 610–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 443. El‐Salhy M., Wendelbo I., and Gundersen D., “Serotonin and Serotonin Transporter in the Rectum of Patients With Irritable Bowel Disease,” Molecular Medicine Reports 8, no. 2 (2013): 451–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 444. Cremon C., Carini G., Wang B., et al., “Intestinal Serotonin Release, Sensory Neuron Activation, and Abdominal Pain in Irritable bowel Syndrome,” American Journal of Gastroenterology 106, no. 7 (2011): 1290–1298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 445. Gao J., Xiong T., Grabauskas G., and Owyang C., “Mucosal Serotonin Reuptake Transporter Expression in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Is Modulated by Gut Microbiota via Mast Cell‐Prostaglandin E2,” Gastroenterology 162, no. 7 (2022): 1962–1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 446. Mishima Y. and Ishihara S., “Enteric Microbiota‐Mediated Serotonergic Signaling in Pathogenesis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 19 (2021): 10235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 447. Zhai L., Huang C., Ning Z., et al., “Ruminococcus Gnavus Plays a Pathogenic Role in Diarrhea‐predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome by Increasing Serotonin Biosynthesis,” Cell Host & Microbe 31, no. 1 (2023): 33–44. e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 448. Gu Y., Wang C., Qin X., et al., “Saccharomyces Boulardii, a Yeast Probiotic, Inhibits Gut Motility Through Upregulating Intestinal Serotonin Transporter and Modulating Gut Microbiota,” Pharmacological Research 181 (2022): 106291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 449. Jin X., Hu Y., Lin T., et al., “Selenium‐enriched Bifidobacterium Longum DD98 Relieves Irritable Bowel Syndrome Induced by Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress in Mice,” Food & Function 14, no. 11 (2023): 5355–5374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 450. Chojnacki C., Błońska A., Konrad P., Chojnacki M., Podogrocki M., and Poplawski T., “Changes in Tryptophan Metabolism on Serotonin and Kynurenine Pathways in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome,” Nutrients 15, no. 5 (2023): 1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 451. Zhang Z. F., Duan Z. J., Wang L. X., Yang D., Zhao G., and Zhang L., “The Serotonin Transporter Gene Polymorphism (5‐HTTLPR) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta‐analysis of 25 Studies,” BMC Gastroenterology [Electronic Resource] 14 (2014): 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 452. Almansa C., Agrawal A., and Houghton L A., “Intestinal Microbiota, Pathophysiology and Translation to Probiotic Use in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome,” Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 6, no. 3 (2012): 383–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 453. Areeshi M. Y., Haque S., Panda A. K., and Mandal R K., “A Serotonin Transporter Gene (SLC6A4) Polymorphism Is Associated With Reduced Risk of Irritable Bowel Syndrome in American and Asian Population: A Meta‐analysis,” PLoS ONE 8, no. 9 (2013): e75567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 454. Bosman L., Wauters L., and Vanuytsel T., “Neuromodulating Agents in Functional Dyspepsia: A Comprehensive Review,” Acta Gastro‐Enterologica Belgica 86, no. 1 (2023): 49–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 455. Shanmugham S., Zuber M., Chan J. E., et al., “Efficacy of Antidepressants in Functional Dyspepsia: Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 44, no. 1 (2025): 24–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 456. Zhou H., Tang X., Wang D., et al., “Neuroregulatory and Clinical Efficacy of Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Elderly Patients With Chronic Insomnia Comorbid With Functional Dyspepsia: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial,” Frontiers in Medicine 12 (2025): 1537515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 457. Kourikou A., Karamanolis G. P., Dimitriadis G. D., and Triantafyllou K., “Gene Polymorphisms Associated With Functional Dyspepsia,” World Journal of Gastroenterology 21, no. 25 (2015): 7672–7682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 458. Korendovych I. V., Svintsits'kyĭ A. S., Revenok K. M., and Maliarov S. O., “[Psychopharmacological approach With the usage of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in functional dyspepsia treatment],” Likarska Sprava no. 11 (2014): 58–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 459. Saito Y. A., Locke G. R., Almazar A. E., et al., “Polymorphisms of 5‐HTT LPR and GNβ3 825C>T and Response to Antidepressant Treatment in Functional Dyspepsia: A Study From the Functional Dyspepsia Treatment Trial,” American Journal of Gastroenterology 112, no. 6 (2017): 903–909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 460. Bahuva R., Yee J., Gupta S., and Atreja A., “SSRI and the Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleed: More Than What Meets the Eye,” American Journal of Gastroenterology 110, no. 2 (2015): 346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 461. Jing F. C., Zhang J., Feng C., et al., “Potential Rat Model of Anxiety‐Like Gastric Hypersensitivity Induced by Sequential Stress,” World Journal of Gastroenterology 23, no. 42 (2017): 7594–7608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 462. Talley N J., “Functional Dyspepsia: New Insights Into Pathogenesis and Therapy,” Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 31, no. 3 (2016): 444–456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 463. Witte A. B., Walker M. M., Talley N. J., et al., “Decreased Number of Duodenal Endocrine Cells With Unaltered Serotonin‐Containing Cells in Functional Dyspepsia,” American Journal of Gastroenterology 111, no. 12 (2016): 1852–1853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 464. Wang Z., Wu L., Dong P., et al., “Meta‐Analysis of the Association between 5‐Hydroxytryptamine Transporter Gene‐Linked Polymorphic Region and Functional Dyspepsia and Its Subtypes,” Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 27, no. 3 (2023): 100–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 465. Jin M., Mo Y., Ye K., Chen M., Liu Y., and He C., “Efficacy of Serotonin Receptor Agonists in the Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia: A Meta‐analysis,” Archives of Medical Science 15, no. 1 (2019): 23–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 466. Xiao Z., Xu J., Tan J., et al., “Zhizhu Kuanzhong, a Traditional Chinese Medicine, Alleviates Gastric Hypersensitivity and Motor Dysfunction on a Rat Model of Functional Dyspepsia,” Frontiers in pharmacology 13 (2022): 1026660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 467. Zhao J., Zhao L., Zhang S., and Zhu C., “Modified Liu‐Jun‐Zi Decoction Alleviates Visceral Hypersensitivity in Functional Dyspepsia by Regulating EC Cell‐5HT3r Signaling in Duodenum,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 250 (2020): 112468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 468. Amano T., Ariga H., Kurematsu A., et al., “Effect of 5‐hydroxytryptamine Receptor 4 Agonist Mosapride on human Gastric Accommodation,” Neurogastroenterology and Motility 27, no. 9 (2015): 1303–1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 469. Goodman W. K., Storch E. A., and Sheth S A., “Harmonizing the Neurobiology and Treatment of Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder,” American Journal of Psychiatry 178, no. 1 (2021): 17–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 470. Xing C., Chen H., Bi W., Lei T., Hang Z., and Du H., “Targeting 5‐HT Is a Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Neurodegenerative Diseases,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 24 (2024): 13446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 471. Borroto‐Escuela D. O., Ambrogini P., Chruścicka B., et al., “The Role of Central Serotonin Neurons and 5‐HT Heteroreceptor Complexes in the Pathophysiology of Depression: A Historical Perspective and Future Prospects,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 4 (2021): 1927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 472. Jauhar S., Cowen P. J., and Browning M., “Fifty Years On: Serotonin and Depression,” Journal of Psychopharmacology 37, no. 3 (2023): 237–241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 473. Lin S. H., Lee L. T., and Yang Y K., “Serotonin and Mental Disorders: A Concise Review on Molecular Neuroimaging Evidence,” Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 12, no. 3 (2014): 196–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 474. Sharp T., Boothman L., Raley J., and Quérée P., “Important Messages in the 'post': Recent Discoveries in 5‐HT Neurone Feedback Control,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 28, no. 12 (2007): 629–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 475. Jacobsen J. P., Medvedev I. O., and Caron M G., “The 5‐HT Deficiency Theory of Depression: Perspectives From a Naturalistic 5‐HT Deficiency Model, the Tryptophan Hydroxylase 2Arg439His Knockin Mouse,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 367, no. 1601 (2012): 2444–2459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 476. Samuels B. A., Anacker C., Hu A., et al., “5‐HT1A receptors on Mature Dentate Gyrus Granule Cells Are Critical for the Antidepressant Response,” Nature Neuroscience 18, no. 11 (2015): 1606–1616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 477. Ruf B. M. and Bhagwagar Z., “The 5‐HT1B Receptor: A Novel Target for the Pathophysiology of Depression,” Current Drug Targets 10, no. 11 (2009): 1118–1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 478. Smith A. L. W., Harmer C. J., Cowen P. J., and Murphy S E., “The Serotonin 1A (5‐HT(1A)) Receptor as a Pharmacological Target in Depression,” CNS Drugs 37, no. 7 (2023): 571–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 479. Głuch‐Lutwin M., Sałaciak K., Pytka K., et al., “The 5‐HT(1A) Receptor Biased Agonist, NLX‐204, Shows Rapid‐acting Antidepressant‐Like Properties and Neurochemical Changes in Two Mouse Models of Depression,” Behavioural Brain Research 438 (2023): 114207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 480. Sekssaoui M., Bockaert J., Marin P., and Bécamel C., “Antidepressant‐Like Effects of Psychedelics in a Chronic Despair Mouse Model: Is the 5‐HT(2A) Receptor the Unique Player?” Neuropsychopharmacology 49, no. 4 (2024): 747–756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 481. Jastrzębska J., Frankowska M., Smaga I., et al., “Evaluation of the 5‐HT(2C) Receptor Drugs RO 60‐0175, WAY 161503 and Mirtazepine in a Preclinical Model of Comorbidity of Depression and Cocaine Addiction,” Pharmacology Reports 75, no. 1 (2023): 99–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 482. Bhatt S., Devadoss T., Manjula S. N., and Rajangam J., “HT(3) Receptor Antagonism a Potential Therapeutic Approach for the Treatment of Depression and Other Disorders,” Current Neuropharmacology 19, no. 9 (2021): 1545–1559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 483. Hamati R., El Mansari M., and Blier P., “Serotonin‐2B Receptor Antagonism Increases the Activity of Dopamine and Glutamate Neurons in the Presence of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibition,” Neuropsychopharmacology 45, no. 12 (2020): 2098–2105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 484. de Cates A. N., Harmer C. J., Harrison P. J., et al., “Association Between a Selective 5‐HT(4) Receptor Agonist and Incidence of Major Depressive Disorder: Emulated Target Trial,” British Journal of Psychiatry 225, no. 3 (2024): 371–378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 485. Kawahara Y., Kawahara H., Kaneko F., and Tanaka M., “Long‐term Administration of citalopram Reduces Basal and Stress‐induced Extracellular Noradrenaline Levels in Rat Brain,” Psychopharmacology 194, no. 1 (2007): 73–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 486. Sachs G. S., Yeung P. P., Rekeda L., Khan A., Adams J. L., and Fava M., “Adjunctive Cariprazine for the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Phase 3 Study,” American Journal of Psychiatry 180, no. 3 (2023): 241–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 487. Gupta D., Prabhakar V., and Radhakrishnan M., “5HT3 receptors: Target for New Antidepressant Drugs,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 64 (2016): 311–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 488. Mnie‐Filali O., Faure C., Lambás‐Señas L., et al., “Pharmacological Blockade of 5‐HT7 Receptors as a Putative Fast Acting Antidepressant Strategy,” Neuropsychopharmacology 36, no. 6 (2011): 1275–1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 489. Bhatt S., Kanoujia J., Mohana Lakshmi S., et al., “Role of Brain‐Gut‐Microbiota Axis in Depression: Emerging Therapeutic Avenues,” CNS & Neurological Disorders ‐ Drug Targets 22, no. 2 (2023): 276–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 490. Ma J., Wang R., Chen Y., Wang Z., and Dong Y., “5‐HT Attenuates Chronic Stress‐induced Cognitive Impairment in Mice Through Intestinal Flora Disruption,” Journal of Neuroinflammation 20, no. 1 (2023): 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 491. López‐Echeverri Y. P., Cardona‐Londoño K. J., Garcia‐Aguirre J. F., and Orrego‐Cardozo M., “Effects of Serotonin Transporter and Receptor Polymorphisms on Depression,” Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (English Edition) 52, no. 2 (2023): 130–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 492. Naber D. and Bullinger M., “Should Antidepressants be Used in minor Depression?” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 20, no. 3 (2018): 223–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 493. Wei W., Deng L., Qiao C., et al., “Neural Variability in Three Major Psychiatric Disorders,” Molecular Psychiatry 28, no. 12 (2023): 5217–5227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 494. Tamminga C. A. and Holcomb H H., “Phenotype of Schizophrenia: A Review and Formulation,” Molecular Psychiatry 10, no. 1 (2005): 27–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 495. Hrovatin K., Kunej T., and Dolžan V., “Genetic Variability of Serotonin Pathway Associated With Schizophrenia Onset, Progression, and Treatment,” American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics 183, no. 2 (2020): 113–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 496. Eggers A. E., “A Serotonin Hypothesis of Schizophrenia,” Medical Hypotheses 80, no. 6 (2013): 791–794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 497. Yamada R., Wada A., Stickley A., Yokoi Y., and Sumiyoshi T., “Effect of 5‐HT1A Receptor Partial Agonists of the Azapirone Class as an Add‐On Therapy on Psychopathology and Cognition in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 26, no. 4 (2023): 249–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 498. Yamada R., Wada A., Stickley A., Newman‐Tancredi A., and Sumiyoshi T., “Augmentation Therapy with Serotonin 5‐HT(1A) Receptor Partial Agonists on Cognitive Function in Depressive Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Studies,” Neuropsychopharmacology Reports 45, no. 2 (2025): e70023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 499. Selvaraj S., Arnone D., Cappai A., and Howes O., “Alterations in the Serotonin System in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Postmortem and Molecular Imaging Studies,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 45 (2014): 233–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 500. Cummings M. A., Arias A. W., and Stahl S M., “What Is the Neurobiology of Schizophrenia?” CNS Spectrums 30, no. 1 (2024): e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 501. Thomas K. and Saadabadi A., “Olanzapine,” StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2025, StatPearls Publishing LLC., 2025). [Google Scholar]
- 502. Kossatz E., Diez‐Alarcia R., Gaitonde S. A., et al., “G Protein‐specific Mechanisms in the Serotonin 5‐HT(2A) Receptor Regulate Psychosis‐related Effects and Memory Deficits,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 4307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 503. Tarzian M., Soudan M., Alhajji M., Ndrio M., and Fakoya A O., “Lurasidone for Treating Schizophrenia and Bipolar Depression: A Review of Its Efficacy,” Cureus 15, no. 4 (2023): e38071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 504. Márquez L. A., Meneses A., and Galván E J., “5‐HT(6) Receptors Control GABAergic Transmission and CA1 Pyramidal Cell Output of Dorsal Hippocampus,” Neuroscience 532 (2023): 65–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 505. Muneta‐Arrate I., Miranda‐Azpiazu P., Horrillo I., Diez‐Alarcia R., and Meana J J., “Ligand Bias and Inverse Agonism on 5‐HT(2A) Receptor‐mediated Modulation of G Protein Activity in Post‐mortem human Brain,” British Journal of Pharmacology 182, no. 14 (2025): 3320–3335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 506. Park Y. S., Kim G. M., Sung H. J., Yu J. Y., and Sung K W., “Atypical Antipsychotic Drug Olanzapine Inhibits 5‐HT(3) Receptor‐mediated Currents by Allosteric and Non‐competitive Mechanisms,” Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 29, no. 4 (2025): 431–442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 507. Kassar O., Shaheen O., Selim A., et al., “Efficacy and Safety of ondansetron in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” General Hospital Psychiatry 96 (2025): 37–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 508. Nikiforuk A., Hołuj M., Kos T., and Popik P., “The Effects of a 5‐HT5A Receptor Antagonist in a Ketamine‐based Rat Model of Cognitive Dysfunction and the Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia,” Neuropharmacology 105 (2016): 351–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 509. Okubo R., Hasegawa T., Fukuyama K., Shiroyama T., and Okada M., “Current Limitations and Candidate Potential of 5‐HT7 Receptor Antagonism in Psychiatric Pharmacotherapy,” Front Psychiatry 12 (2021): 623684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 510. Galici R., Boggs J. D., Miller K. L., Bonaventure P., and Atack J R., “Effects of SB‐269970, a 5‐HT7 Receptor Antagonist, in Mouse Models Predictive of Antipsychotic‐Like Activity,” Behavioural Pharmacology 19, no. 2 (2008): 153–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 511. Frankle W. G., Lombardo I., Kegeles L. S., et al., “Serotonin 1A Receptor Availability in Patients With Schizophrenia and Schizo‐affective Disorder: A Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Study With [11C]WAY 100635,” Psychopharmacology 189, no. 2 (2006): 155–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 512. Alvarez‐Herrera S., Rosel Vales M., Pérez‐Sánchez G., et al., “Risperidone Decreases Expression of Serotonin Receptor‐2A (5‐HT2A) and Serotonin Transporter (SERT) but Not Dopamine Receptors and Dopamine Transporter (DAT) in PBMCs From Patients With Schizophrenia,” Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 17, no. 2 (2024): 167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 513. Li H. Y., Huang S. Y., Zhou D. D., et al., “Theabrownin Inhibits Obesity and Non‐alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Mice via Serotonin‐related Signaling Pathways and Gut‐liver Axis,” Journal of Advanced Research 52 (2023): 59–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 514. Kimura M., Moteki H., and Ogihara M., “Role of Hepatocyte Growth Regulators in Liver Regeneration,” Cells 12, no. 2 (2023): 208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 515. Lesurtel M. and Clavien P A., “Platelet‐derived Serotonin: Translational Implications for Liver Regeneration,” Hepatology 60, no. 1 (2014): 30–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 516. Starlinger P., Haegele S., Offensperger F., et al., “The Profile of Platelet α‐granule Released Molecules Affects Postoperative Liver Regeneration,” Hepatology 63, no. 5 (2016): 1675–1688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 517. Yoshizumi T., Itoh S., Imai D., et al., “Impact of Platelets and Serotonin on Liver Regeneration After Living Donor Hepatectomy,” Transplantation Proceedings 47, no. 3 (2015): 683–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 518. He C., Zhai M., Shu B., Deng C., Li L., and Liu S., “5‐HT and Intraplatelet 5‐HT: A Potential Upstream Regulator of YAP in Liver Regeneration,” Experimental & Molecular Medicine 51, no. 10 (2019): 1–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 519. Fang Y., Liu C., Shu B., et al., “Axis of Serotonin ‐pERK‐YAP in Liver Regeneration,” Life Sciences 209 (2018): 490–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 520. Ebrahimkhani M. R., Oakley F., Murphy L. B., et al., “Stimulating Healthy Tissue Regeneration by Targeting the 5‐HT2B Receptor in Chronic Liver Disease,” Nature Medicine 17, no. 12 (2011): 1668–1673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 521. Wen Y., Emontzpohl C., Xu L., et al., “Interleukin‐33 Facilitates Liver Regeneration Through Serotonin‐involved Gut‐liver Axis,” Hepatology 77, no. 5 (2023): 1580–1592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 522. Pyroja S., Joseph B., and Paulose C S., “Increased 5‐HT2C Receptor Binding in the Brain Stem and Cerebral Cortex During Liver Regeneration and Hepatic Neoplasia in Rats,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences 254, no. 1‐2 (2007): 3–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 523. Redenšek Trampuž S., van Riet S., Nordling Å., and Ingelman‐Sundberg M., “Mechanisms of 5‐HT Receptor Antagonists in the Regulation of Fibrosis in a 3D human Liver Spheroid Model,” Scientific Reports 14, no. 1 (2024): 1396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 524. Fu J., Li C., Zhang G., et al., “Crucial Roles of 5‐HT and 5‐HT2 Receptor in Diabetes‐Related Lipid Accumulation and Pro‐Inflammatory Cytokine Generation in Hepatocytes,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry 48, no. 6 (2018): 2409–2428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 525. Chung C. and Iwakiri Y., “Activated Hepatic Stellate Cells: Negative Regulators of Hepatocyte Proliferation in Liver Diseases,” Hepatology 56, no. 1 (2012): 389–391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 526. Yoon J., Choi W. I., Lee W. H., et al., “Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Peripheral 5HT(2B) Antagonists for Liver Fibrosis,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 68, no. 6 (2025): 6493–6506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 527. Kyritsi K., Chen L., and O'Brien A., “Modulation of the Tryptophan Hydroxylase 1/Monoamine Oxidase‐A/5‐Hydroxytryptamine/5‐Hydroxytryptamine Receptor 2A/2B/2C Axis Regulates Biliary Proliferation and Liver Fibrosis during Cholestasis,” Hepatology 71, no. 3 (2020): 990–1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 528. Ruddell R. G., Oakley F., Hussain Z., et al., “A Role for Serotonin (5‐HT) in Hepatic Stellate Cell Function and Liver Fibrosis,” American Journal of Pathology 169, no. 3 (2006): 861–876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 529. Polat B., Halici Z., Cadirci E., et al., “Liver 5‐HT7 Receptors: A Novel Regulator Target of Fibrosis and Inflammation‐induced Chronic Liver Injury in Vivo and in Vitro,” International Immunopharmacology 43 (2017): 227–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 530. Park J., Jeong W., Yun C., Kim H., and Oh C M., “Serotonergic Regulation of Hepatic Energy Metabolism,” Endocrinology and Metabolism (Seoul) 36, no. 6 (2021): 1151–1160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 531. Teunis C., Nieuwdorp M., and Hanssen N., “Interactions Between Tryptophan Metabolism, the Gut Microbiome and the Immune System as Potential Drivers of Non‐Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and Metabolic Diseases,” Metabolites 12, no. 6 (2022): 514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 532. Nocito A., Dahm F., Jochum W., et al., “Serotonin Mediates Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Toxicity in a Murine Model of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis,” Gastroenterology 133, no. 2 (2007): 608–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 533. Crane J. D., Palanivel R., Mottillo E. P., et al., “Inhibiting Peripheral Serotonin Synthesis Reduces Obesity and Metabolic Dysfunction by Promoting Brown Adipose Tissue Thermogenesis,” Nature Medicine 21, no. 2 (2015): 166–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 534. Binetti J., Bertran L., Riesco D., et al., “Deregulated Serotonin Pathway in Women With Morbid Obesity and NAFLD,” Life (Basel) 10, no. 10 (2020): 245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 535. Wang L., Fan X., and Han J., “Gut‐Derived Serotonin Contributes to the Progression of Non‐Alcoholic Steatohepatitis via the Liver HTR2A/PPARγ2 Pathway,” Frontiers in pharmacology 11 (2020): 553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 536. Choi W., Namkung J., Hwang I., et al., “Serotonin Signals Through a Gut‐liver Axis to Regulate Hepatic Steatosis,” Nature Communications 9, no. 1 (2018): 4824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 537. Sessa L., Concilio S., Fominaya J., Eletto D., Piotto S., and Busquets X., “A New Serotonin 2A Receptor Antagonist With Potential Benefits in Non‐Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease,” Life Sciences 314 (2023): 121315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 538. Kim M., Choi W., Yoon J., et al., “Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Tyrosine Derivatives as Peripheral 5HT(2A) Receptor Antagonists for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 239 (2022): 114517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 539. Kim M. H., Kim S. J., Park W. J., Lee D. H., and Kim K K., “GR113808, a Serotonin Receptor 4 Antagonist, Prevents High‐fat‐diet‐induced Obesity, Fatty Liver Formation, and Insulin Resistance in C57BL/6J Mice,” BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology 25, no. 1 (2024): 76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 540. Haub S., Ritze Y., Ladel I., et al., “Serotonin Receptor Type 3 Antagonists Improve Obesity‐associated Fatty Liver Disease in Mice,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 339, no. 3 (2011): 790–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 541. Chen D., Wang Y., Yang J., et al., “Shenling Baizhu San Ameliorates Non‐alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Mice by Modulating Gut Microbiota and Metabolites,” Frontiers in pharmacology 15 (2024): 1343755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 542. Cao L., Chen J., Wang Y., et al., “Identification of Serotonin 2A Receptor as a Novel HCV Entry Factor by a Chemical Biology Strategy,” Protein Cell 10, no. 3 (2019): 178–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 543. Wang Y M., “[Abnormal platelet function and ultrastructure in patients With severe viral hepatitis],” Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi [Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine] 29, no. 7 (1990): 416–418. 445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 544. Loftis J. M., Morasco B. J., Menasco D., Fuchs D., Strater M., and Hauser P., “Serum Serotonin Levels Are Associated With Antiviral Therapy Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C,” Open Infect Dis J 4 (2010): 132–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 545. Lang P. A., Contaldo C., Georgiev P., et al., “Aggravation of Viral hepatitis by Platelet‐derived Serotonin,” Nature Medicine 14, no. 7 (2008): 756–761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 546. Chang C. M., Hsieh M. S., Yang T. C., et al., “Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in hepatitis B Virus‐infected Patients,” Cancer Management and Research 9 (2017): 709–720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 547. Sumara G., Sumara O., Kim J. K., and Karsenty G., “Gut‐derived Serotonin Is a Multifunctional Determinant to Fasting Adaptation,” Cell metabolism 16, no. 5 (2012): 588–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 548. Xie K. Y., Chien S. J., Tan B. C., and Chen Y W., “RNA Editing of 5‐HT(2C) R Impairs Insulin Secretion of Pancreatic Beta Cells via Altered Store‐operated Calcium Entry,” Faseb Journal 35, no. 10 (2021): e21929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 549. Takishita E., Takahashi A., Harada N., Yamato M., Yoshizumi M., and Nakaya Y., “Effect of Sarpogrelate Hydrochloride, a 5‐HT2 Blocker, on Insulin Resistance in Otsuka Long‐Evans Tokushima Fatty Rats (OLETF rats), a Type 2 Diabetic Rat Model,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 43, no. 2 (2004): 266–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 550. Yamada J., Sugimoto Y., Yoshikawa T., Kimura I., and Horisaka K., “The Involvement of the Peripheral 5‐HT2A Receptor in Peripherally Administered Serotonin‐induced Hyperglycemia in Rats,” Life Sciences 57, no. 8 (1995): 819–825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 551. Watanabe H., Nakano T., Saito R., et al., “Serotonin Improves High Fat Diet Induced Obesity in Mice,” PLoS ONE 11, no. 1 (2016): e0147143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 552. Derkach K. V., Bondareva V. M., Chistyakova O. V., Berstein L. M., and Shpakov A O., “The Effect of Long‐Term Intranasal Serotonin Treatment on Metabolic Parameters and Hormonal Signaling in Rats With High‐Fat Diet/Low‐Dose Streptozotocin‐Induced Type 2 Diabetes,” International Journal of Endocrinology 2015 (2015): 245459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 553. Chi T. C., Ho Y. J., Chen W. P., et al., “Serotonin Enhances Beta‐endorphin Secretion to Lower Plasma Glucose in Streptozotocin‐induced Diabetic Rats,” Life Sciences 80, no. 20 (2007): 1832–1838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 554. Chen H., Hong F., Chen Y., et al., “Activation of Islet 5‐HT4 Receptor Regulates Glycemic Control Through Promoting Insulin Secretion,” European Journal of Pharmacology 789 (2016): 354–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 555. Kim K., Oh C. M., Ohara‐Imaizumi M., et al., “Functional Role of Serotonin in Insulin Secretion in a Diet‐induced Insulin‐resistant state,” Endocrinology 156, no. 2 (2015): 444–452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 556. Paulmann N., Grohmann M., Voigt J. P., et al., “Intracellular Serotonin Modulates Insulin Secretion From Pancreatic Beta‐cells by Protein Serotonylation,” Plos Biology 7, no. 10 (2009): e1000229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 557. Hasni Ebou M., Singh‐Estivalet A., and Launay J. M., “Glucocorticoids Inhibit Basal and Hormone‐Induced Serotonin Synthesis in Pancreatic Beta Cells,” PLoS ONE 11, no. 2 (2016): e0149343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 558. Liu N., Liu T., Alim N., et al., “5‐HT Promotes Pancreatic α‐to‐β Cell Transdifferentiation,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) ‐ Molecular Cell Research 1872, no. 5 (2025): 119958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 559. García‐Pedraza J., Hernández‐Abreu O., Morán A., Carretero J., García‐Domingo M., and Villalón C M., “Role of Peripheral 5‐HT(5A) Receptors in 5‐HT‐induced Cardiac Sympatho‐inhibition in Type 1 Diabetic Rats,” Scientific Reports 10, no. 1 (2020): 19358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 560. Li M., Chen X., Cao N., Lv R., and Gu B., “Improvement of Urethral Dysfunction by 5‐HT(1A) Receptor Agonist NLX‐112 in Diabetic Rats,” Neurourology and Urodynamics 41, no. 7 (2022): 1528–1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 561. Jin B., Ha S. E., Wei L., et al., “Colonic Motility Is Improved by the Activation of 5‐HT(2B) Receptors on Interstitial Cells of Cajal in Diabetic Mice,” Gastroenterology 161, no. 2 (2021): 608–622. e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 562. Munawar N., Bitar M. S., and Masocha W., “Activation of 5‐HT1A Receptors Normalizes the Overexpression of Presynaptic 5‐HT1A Receptors and Alleviates Diabetic Neuropathic Pain,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 18 (2023): 14334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 563. Shuai J., Gao Y., Chen L., and Wang Z., “Role of Serotonin in Regulation of Pancreatic and Mesenteric Arterial Function in Diabetic Mice,” European Journal of Pharmacology 901 (2021): 174070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 564. Hellstrand K., Czerkinsky C., Ricksten A., et al., “Role of Serotonin in the Regulation of Interferon‐gamma Production by human Natural Killer Cells,” Journal of Interferon Research 13, no. 1 (1993): 33–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 565. Iken K., Chheng S., Fargin A., Goulet A. C., and Kouassi E., “Serotonin Upregulates Mitogen‐stimulated B Lymphocyte Proliferation Through 5‐HT1A Receptors,” Cellular Immunology 163, no. 1 (1995): 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 566. Wan M., Ma Z., Han J., et al., “5‐HT Induces Regulatory B Cells in Fighting Against Inflammation‐driven Ulcerative Colitis,” International Immunopharmacology 125, no. Pt A (2023): 111042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 567. Müller T., Dürk T., Blumenthal B., et al., “5‐hydroxytryptamine Modulates Migration, Cytokine and Chemokine Release and T‐cell Priming Capacity of Dendritic Cells in Vitro and in Vivo,” PLoS ONE 4, no. 7 (2009): e6453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 568. Katoh N., Soga F., Nara T., et al., “Effect of Serotonin on the Differentiation of human Monocytes Into Dendritic Cells,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology 146, no. 2 (2006): 354–361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 569. Fabà L., de Groot N., Ramis G., Cabrera‐Gómez C. G., and Doelman J., “Serotonin Receptors and Their Association With the Immune System in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Weaning Piglets,” Porcine Health Manag 8, no. 1 (2022): 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 570. Wang S., Kong L., Wang L., et al., “Viral Expression of NE/PPE Enhances Anti‐colorectal Cancer Efficacy of Oncolytic adenovirus by Promoting TAM M1 Polarization to Reverse Insufficient Effector Memory/Effector CD8(+) T Cell Infiltration,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 44, no. 1 (2025): 97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 571. Liu K., Kong L., Cui H., et al., “Thymosin α1 Reverses Oncolytic adenovirus‐induced M2 Polarization of Macrophages to Improve Antitumor Immunity and Therapeutic Efficacy,” Cell Reports Medicine 5, no. 10 (2024): 101751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 572. Xiao L., Zhang L., Guo C., et al., “Find Me" and "Eat Me" Signals: Tools to Drive Phagocytic Processes for Modulating Antitumor Immunity,” Cancer communications (London) 44, no. 7 (2024): 791–832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 573. Molina‐Cerrillo J., Grande E., and Alonso‐Gordoa T., “Inhibition of Serotonin Synthesis May Have Antitumor Activity? Long‐Term Efficacy in a Patient With Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor,” The Oncologist 24, no. 7 (2019): e597–e599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 574. Szabo A., Gogolak P., Koncz G., et al., “Immunomodulatory Capacity of the Serotonin Receptor 5‐HT2B in a Subset of human Dendritic Cells,” Scientific Reports 8, no. 1 (2018): 1765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 575. Karmakar S. and Lal G., “Role of Serotonergic System in Regulating Brain Tumor‐Associated Neuroinflammatory Responses,” Methods in Molecular Biology 2761 (2024): 181–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 576. Waldman A. D., Fritz J. M., and Lenardo M J., “A Guide to Cancer Immunotherapy: From T Cell Basic Science to Clinical Practice,” Nature Reviews Immunology 20, no. 11 (2020): 651–668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 577. Zhang H., Zhang Y., Dong J., et al., “Recombinant Oncolytic adenovirus Expressing a Soluble PVR Elicits Long‐term Antitumor Immune Surveillance,” Molecular Therapy Oncolytics 20 (2021): 12–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 578. Zhang H., Zhang Y., Dong J., et al., “Recombinant adenovirus Expressing the Fusion Protein PD1PVR Improves CD8(+) T Cell‐mediated Antitumor Efficacy With Long‐term Tumor‐specific Immune Surveillance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” Cellular oncology (Dordrecht) 44, no. 6 (2021): 1243–1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 579. Zhang Y., Wu J., Zhang H., Wei J., and Wu J., “Extracellular Vesicles‐Mimetic Encapsulation Improves Oncolytic Viro‐Immunotherapy in Tumors with Low Coxsackie and Adenovirus Receptor,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8 (2020): 574007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 580. Chen A., Zhang Y., Meng G., et al., “Oncolytic Measles Virus Enhances Antitumour Responses of Adoptive CD8(+)NKG2D(+) Cells in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment,” Scientific Reports 7, no. 1 (2017): 5170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 581. Quintero‐Villegas A. and Valdés‐Ferrer S I., “Role of 5‐HT(7) Receptors in the Immune System in Health and Disease,” Molecular Medicine 26, no. 1 (2019): 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 582. Zhan D., Wang X., Zheng Y., et al., “Integrative Dissection of 5‐hydroxytryptamine Receptors‐related Signature in the Prognosis and Immune Microenvironment of Breast Cancer,” Frontiers in oncology 13 (2023): 1147189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 583. Wang X., Fu S. Q., Yuan X., et al., “A GAPDH Serotonylation System Couples CD8(+) T Cell Glycolytic Metabolism to Antitumor Immunity,” Molecular Cell 84, no. 4 (2024): 760–775. e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 584. Zhou S., Ye D., Xia H., et al., “Sertraline Inhibits Stress‐induced Tumor Growth Through Regulating CD8 + T Cell‐mediated Anti‐tumor Immunity,” Anti‐Cancer Drugs 33, no. 9 (2022): 935–942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 585. Hellstrand K. and Hermodsson S., “Role of Serotonin in the Regulation of human Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity,” Journal of Immunology 139, no. 3 (1987): 869–875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 586. Li B., Elsten‐Brown J., Li M., et al., “Serotonin Transporter Inhibits Antitumor Immunity Through Regulating the Intratumoral Serotonin Axis,” Cell 188, no. 14 (2025): 3823–3842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 587. Pivac N., Kozaric‐Kovacic D., Mustapic M., et al., “Platelet Serotonin in Combat Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder With Psychotic Symptoms,” Journal of Affective Disorders 93, no. 1‐3 (2006): 223–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 588. Okaty B. W., Commons K. G., and Dymecki S M., “Embracing Diversity in the 5‐HT Neuronal System,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 20, no. 7 (2019): 397–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 589. Senol S. and Es M U., “Is Serotonin a Valuable Parameter in Peripheral Arterial Disease?” Asian Cardiovascular & Thoracic Annals 23, no. 3 (2015): 289–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 590. Pillai R. L. I., Zhang M., Yang J., et al., “Will Imaging Individual Raphe Nuclei in Males With Major Depressive Disorder Enhance Diagnostic Sensitivity and Specificity?” Depression and Anxiety 35, no. 5 (2018): 411–420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 591. Jauhar S., Arnone D., Baldwin D. S., et al., “A Leaky Umbrella Has Little Value: Evidence Clearly Indicates the Serotonin System Is Implicated in Depression,” Molecular Psychiatry 28, no. 8 (2023): 3149–3152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 592. Mohammadi A., Rashidi E., and Amooeian V G., “Brain, Blood, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Serum Biomarkers in Schizophrenia,” Psychiatry Research 265 (2018): 25–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 593. Li C., Cai Q., Su Z., Chen Z., Cao J., and Xu F., “Could Peripheral 5‐HT Level be Used as a Biomarker for Depression Diagnosis and Treatment? A Narrative Minireview,” Frontiers in pharmacology 14 (2023): 1149511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 594. Lopresti A. L., Maker G. L., Hood S. D., and Drummond P D., “A Review of Peripheral Biomarkers in Major Depression: The Potential of Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers,” Progress in Neuro‐Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 48 (2014): 102–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 595. Hagbom M., De Faria F. M., Winberg M. E., et al., “Neurotrophic Factors Protect the Intestinal Barrier From Rotavirus Insult in Mice,” MBio 11, no. 1 (2020): e02834–e02919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 596. Grozić A., Coker K., Dussik C. M., et al., “Identification of Putative Transcriptomic Biomarkers in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS): Differential Gene Expression and Regulation of TPH1 and SERT by Vitamin D,” PLoS ONE 17, no. 10 (2022): e0275683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 597. Xu Z., Chen J. J., Mei Q., Li Y., and Xu J., “Expression of 5‐hydroxytryptamine 7 Receptor in Intestinal Mucosa Correlates With the Degree of Intestinal Inflammation in Crohn's disease,” BMC Gastroenterology [Electronic Resource] 22, no. 1 (2022): 457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 598. Ghiboub M., Boneh R. S., Sovran B., et al., “Sustained Diet‐Induced Remission in Pediatric Crohn's Disease Is Associated with Kynurenine and Serotonin Pathways,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 29, no. 5 (2023): 684–694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 599. Cirillo C., Tack J., and Vanden Berghe P., “Nerve Activity Recordings in Routine human Intestinal Biopsies,” Gut 62, no. 2 (2013): 227–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 600. Manzella C. R., Jayawardena D., Pagani W., et al., “Serum Serotonin Differentiates between Disease Activity States in Crohn's Patients,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 26, no. 10 (2020): 1607–1618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 601. Grieco P. and Gomez‐Monterrey I., “Natural and Synthetic Peptides in the Cardiovascular Diseases: An Update on Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potentials,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 662 (2019): 15–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 602. Wei L., Warburton R. R., Preston I. R., et al., “Serotonylated Fibronectin Is Elevated in Pulmonary Hypertension,” American Journal of Physiology. Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 302, no. 12 (2012): L1273–L1279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 603. Ban Y., Watanabe T., Miyazaki A., et al., “Impact of Increased Plasma Serotonin Levels and Carotid Atherosclerosis on Vascular Dementia,” Atherosclerosis 195, no. 1 (2007): 153–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 604. Xia Y., Wang D., Zhang N., Wang Z., and Pang L., “Plasma Serotonin Level Is a Predictor for Recurrence and Poor Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer Patients,” Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 32, no. 2 (2018): e22263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 605. Fröberg G. K., Lindberg R., Ritter M., and Nordlind K., “Expression of Serotonin and Its 5‐HT1A Receptor in Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumours,” Journal of Comparative Pathology 141, no. 2‐3 (2009): 89–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 606. Fröbe A., Čičin‐Šain L., Jones G., et al., “Plasma Free Serotonin as a Marker for Early Detection of Breast Cancer Recurrence,” Anticancer Research 34, no. 3 (2014): 1167–1169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 607. Zuetenhorst J. M. and Taal B G., “Metastatic Carcinoid Tumors: A Clinical Review,” The Oncologist 10, no. 2 (2005): 123–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 608. AhYoung A. P., Eckard S. C., Gogineni A., et al., “Neutrophil Serine Protease 4 Is Required for Mast Cell‐dependent Vascular Leakage,” Communications Biology 3, no. 1 (2020): 687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 609. Bernardes M., Vieira T., Lucas R., et al., “Serum Serotonin Levels and Bone in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients,” Rheumatology International 37, no. 11 (2017): 1891–1898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 610. Al‐Sharman A., Al‐Khazaaleh H. M., Khalil H., Aburub A., and El‐Salem K., “The Relationship between Sleep Quality, Sleep‐Related Biomarkers, and Motor Skill Acquisition in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study,” Physical Therapy 101, no. 10 (2021): pzab175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 611. Khoshnevisan K., Chehrehgosha M., Sajjadi‐Jazi S. M., and Meftah A M., “Tryptophan and Serotonin Levels as Potent Biomarkers in Diabetes Mellitus Complications: A New Approach of Diagnostic Role,” Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders 21, no. 2 (2022): 1923–1934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 612. Yubero‐Lahoz S., Robledo P., Farré M., and de laTorre R., “Platelet SERT as a Peripheral Biomarker of Serotonergic Neurotransmission in the central Nervous System,” Current Medicinal Chemistry 20, no. 11 (2013): 1382–1396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 613. De Vadder F., Grasset E., Mannerås Holm L., et al., “Gut Microbiota Regulates Maturation of the Adult Enteric Nervous System via Enteric Serotonin Networks,” PNAS 115, no. 25 (2018): 6458–6463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 614. Agus A., Planchais J., and Sokol H., “Gut Microbiota Regulation of Tryptophan Metabolism in Health and Disease,” Cell Host & Microbe 23, no. 6 (2018): 716–724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No data were used for the research described in the article.
