Table 2.
Standardized model results for effects of family history and covariates on latent mediators.
| Predictors | Mediators | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Reward | |||
| β | SE | p-value | |
| Family History | 0.282 | 0.103 | 0.006 |
| Sex | −0.007 | −0.167 | 0.868 |
| Adolescent Binge | |||
| Drinking | −0.053 | 0.079 | 0.504 |
| Childhood Trauma | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.885 |
| No Choice Variation | 0.131 | 0.081 | 0.110 |
| Cognitive Control | |||
| β | SE | p-value | |
| Family History | −0.086 | 0.098 | 0.382 |
| Sex | 0.027 | 0.083 | 0.747 |
| Adolescent Binge | |||
| Drinking | 0.013 | 0.074 | 0.857 |
| Childhood Trauma | 0.002 | 0.776 | 0.438 |
| No Choice Variation | −0.144 | 0.160 | 0.368 |
| Prospection | |||
| β | SE | p-value | |
| Family History | −0.035 | 0.102 | 0.734 |
| Sex | 0.047 | 0.031 | 0.127 |
| Adolescent Binge | |||
| Drinking | −0.062 | 0.033 | 0.065 |
| Childhood Trauma | −0.004 | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| No Choice Variation | 0.040 | 0.057 | 0.486 |
| Delay Discounting | |||
| β | SE | p-value | |
| Family History | −0.146 | 0.070 | 0.037 |
| Sex | 0.119 | 0.037 | 0.001 |
| Adolescent Binge | |||
| Drinking | −0.033 | 0.043 | 0.440 |
| Childhood Trauma | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.550 |
| No Choice Variation | 0.403 | 0.037 | 0.000 |
Latent variable for reward was comprised of the bilateral nucleus accumbens, cognitive control was comprised of the bilateral caudal middle frontal gyrus, prospection was comprised of the bilateral hippocampus, and delay discounting was comprised of the area-under-the-curve behavior for $100 and $1000 options.