Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 25;14(8):2009–2022. doi: 10.21037/tp-2025-318

Table 3. Quality evaluation results of clinical guidelines (n=4).

Guidance Standardized scores in various domains (%) ≥60% ≥30% Quality evaluation
Scope and purpose Participant Rigor Clarity Application Independence
Guidelines for the sequential treatment of cleft lip and palate (4) 94.4 88.9 79.2 97.2 52.1 87.5 5 6 B
Oh et al. (23) 91.6 80.6 65.6 80.5 66.7 83.3 6 6 A
Chinese Stomatological Association (24) 100 94.4 86.5 91.6 64.6 62.5 6 6 A
Boyce et al. (25) 97.2 80.6 72.9 80.5 56.3 54.2 4 6 B