Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 15;51(9):e70077. doi: 10.1111/jog.70077

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

The molecular characteristic of 505 UCEC samples. (a) Waterfall chart for genetic mutation analysis. (b) Stacked bar chart showcasing the percentages of the co‐mutation for PCLO mutation and SYNE1 mutation groups. (c) The proportion of molecular subtypes of four groups (PCLO+/SYNE1+, PCLO+/SYNE1−, PCLO−/SYNE1+, PCLO−/SYNE1−); (d) The TMB level of four groups. (e) The aneuploidy score of four groups; (f) The MSIsensor score of four groups. (g) The comparison of TMB level analysis between co‐mutation group and NCM group. (h) The comparison of aneuploidy score analysis between co‐mutation group and NCM group. (i) The comparison of MSIsensor score analysis between co‐mutation group and NCM group. PCLO+/SYNE1+/co‐mutation, PCLO and SYNE1 co‐mutant group; PCLO+/SYNE1−, PCLO mutant and SYNE1 wild‐type group; PCLO−/SYNE1+, PCLO wild‐type and SYNE1 mutant group; PCLO−/SYNE1−, PCLO and SYNE1 double wild‐type group; NCM, non‐co‐mutation; **, p <0.01; ***, p <0.001.