Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 27;66(5):416–430. doi: 10.4111/icu.20250147

Table 7. Consensus on mHSPC management of monitoring.

Pre-determined key question (yes/no) Questions and response options Completed
First round (n=23) Second round (n=23)
No 24. What ongoing monitoring by imaging do you recommend for the majority of patients with mHSPC on intensive systemic therapy (assuming that they do not develop new symptoms) in the current reimbursement environment? Consensus
1. PSA-prompted and no imaging until confirmed PSA progression 8.7% (2)
2. Regular imaging, e.g., every 3 months, regardless of PSA 82.6% (19)
3. Regular imaging, e.g., every 6–12 months, regardless of PSA 8.7% (2)
No 25. What ongoing monitoring by imaging do you recommend for the majority of patients with mHSPC on systemic therapy (assuming that they do not develop new symptoms) if all the options are reimbursed? No consensus Consensus
1. PSA-prompted and no imaging until confirmed PSA progression 17.4% (4) 8.7% (2)
2. Regular imaging, e.g., every 3 months, regardless of PSA 26.1% (6) 4.3% (1)
3. Regular imaging, e.g., every 6–12 months regardless of PSA 56.5% (13) 87.0% (20)
No 26. For the majority of patients, what is your preferred imaging modality of patients with mHSPC for treatment monitoring? Consensus
1. Conventional imaging 87.0% (20)
2. Whole-body MRI 0.0% (0)
3. PSMA PET 13.0% (3)

Values are presented as % (number).

mHSPC, metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PSMA PET, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography.