Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 4;33(17):5533–5543. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki852

Table 2.

Comparison of the rates of co-expression and inverse expression between different putative SA pair setsa

Putative SA pair set Human Mouse
Rate of co-expression Rate of inverse expression Rate of co-expression Rate of inverse expression
Conserved 60.8% (211/347) 51.9% (180/347) 56.8% (197/347) 44.4% (154/347)
Non-conserved 34.9% (961/2750) 28.5% (784/2750) 32.4% (246/759) 28.7% (218/759)
x2-test P < 10−4 P < 10−4 P < 10−4 P < 10−4
3′-to-3′ 51.5% (561/1090) 41.9% (457/1090) 55.3% (293/530) 44.2% (234/530)
5′-to-5′ 34.2% (227/664) 29.2% (194/664) 28.7% (85/296) 26.7% (79/296)
embedded 28.6% (384/1343) 23.3% (313/1343) 23.2% (65/280) 21.1% (59/280)
x2-test (3′-to-3′ versus 5′-to-5′; 3′-to-3′ versus embedded) P < 10−4; P < 10−4 P < 10−4; P < 10−4 P < 10−4; P < 10−4 P < 10−4; P < 10−4

aNote that, all P-values far <10−4 are also shown as P < 10−4. The co-expressed putative SA pairs were defined as those in which the two partners are coordinately expressed in the same tissues more often than expected by chance; the inversely expressed putative SA pairs were defined as those with both an inverse expression pattern between two partners and a significantly greater change of the relative expression ratio of sense to antisense between two states of the same tissues than expected by chance; the conserved putative SA pairs are the pairs conserved as putative SA form in both human and mouse genomes. See Materials and Methods for more details.