Table 2.
Assessment of methodological quality for the included studies.
| Included study | Randomization method | Allocation concealment | Blinding | Completeness of outcome data | Selective reporting bias | Other bias | Quality rating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants | Assessors | |||||||
| Wang et al. (42) | HR | HR | UR | UR | LR | UR | LR | B |
| Meng et al. (43) | LR | LR | UR | UR | UR | HR | LR | B |
| Carcelén-Fraile et al. (44) | LR | LR | LR | UR | LR | LR | LR | A |
| Peng et al. (45) | LR | LR | UR | UR | UR | UR | UR | B |
| Huang et al. (46) | LR | UR | HR | HR | UR | UR | LR | B |
| Xu et al., 2022 (47) | HR | HR | HR | HR | LR | UR | LR | B |
| Chen et al., 2022 (48) | LR | UR | HR | HR | UR | UR | UR | B |
| Wu et al. (49) | HR | HR | UR | UR | UR | UR | UR | B |
| Huang et al., 2023 (50) | LR | LR | LR | LR | LR | LR | LR | A |
| Guo et al. (51) | LR | UR | LR | LR | LR | LR | UR | A |
| Zhu et al. (52) | HR | UR | UR | HR | UR | UR | UR | B |
High Risk, HR; Low Risk, LR; Unclear Risk, UR.