Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 3;13:1540529. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1540529

Table 2.

Comparison of suitability scores for materials before and after training (by item).

Evaluation items Before*
31 materials
After*
31 materials
p-value†
1. Content
a) Is the title prominent? 53.8 (21.7) 56.2 (23.0) 0.61
b) Is the purpose specific in the title and others? 57.7 (22.2) 56.5 (26.3) 0.84
c) Is there information necessary for the action for health checkups? 50.7 (20.8) 59.5 (18.0) 0.0496
d) Is there too much information on medical facts? 63.0 (18.2) 61.4 (24.5) 0.73
e) Are the benefits of undergoing health checkups explained? 29.3 (24.7) 29.2 (25.4) 0.98
f) Is the cost of health checkups written? 47.2 (31.0) 44.0 (34.3) 0.69
g) Is the deadline of health checkups written? 46.6 (31.0) 41.7 (38.7) 0.40
2. Literacy demand
a) Is the text easy to read? 36.4 (10.5) 38.2 (17.2) 0.71
b) Is it written in a conversational style? 67.7 (20.7) 72.0 (8.03) 0.06
c) Is it written in active voice? 68.4 (8.3) 72.6 (9.13) 0.12
d) Is the language and terminology too difficult? 48.2 (9.4) 50.5 (24.1) 0.66
3. Graphic illustrations, lists, tables, charts
a) Is the meaning clear with favorable emphasis? 28.5 (21.6) 31.9 (18.5) 0.50
b) Is it not too technical? 66.5 (16.8) 64.8 (17.9) 0.67
c) Does it visually represent only the key points? 58.4 (18.9) 60.1 (16.0) 0.80
d) Is there a title and a caption to indicate the content? 27.7 (28.9) 43.8 (26.9) 0.03
4. Layout and typography
a) Is the layout consistent and readable in sequence? 51.5 (21.5) 62.0 (15.8) 0.04
b) Are there sufficient margins and line spacing? 42.6 (25.8) 54.6 (19.7) 0.046
c) Is the emphasis of the type not excessive? 41.6 (32.6) 46.4 (32.9) 0.39
d) Is the type not too small? 41.7 (20.1) 42.1 (23.3) 0.92
e) Is the information divided into small sections with headings? 62.1 (15.3) 59.6 (16.5) 0.58
5. Learning stimulation and motivation
a) Is the information not one-sided? 11.7 (26.8) 13.4 (30.4) 0.82
b) Do the readers feel able to receive the health checkups? 45.2 (13.9) 47.8 (20.1) 0.44
c) Do the expressions convey an attitude of respect for the reader as a person? 63.4 (12.7) 59.3 (19.5) 0.30
6. Custom contextual appropriateness
a) Is the color use suitable? 42.6 (27.7) 53.1 (21.2) 0.11
b) Is the contact information clear? 60.4 (22.2) 65.8 (22.8) 0.12
c) Is the paper size suitable? 49.8 (20.2) 52.9 (16.5) 0.50

Bold values indicate the best performance for each metric. *Mean (standard deviation), †Paired t-test (two-sided).