Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 2;88:103444. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103444

Table 2.

Designs of included studies.

Primary author (Year); Country Study design Length of follow-up Method of assessment Population characteristics
Setting
Child
Adults
Impairment/Disability; assessment method Age range (years) Sex Parent/caregiver or community members
Barros de Oliveira (2006); Brazil One group before-after, no control 30 months Observation Multiple; Researcher determined 8 years and 3 months All Female 1 caregiver Community venues
Bharat (2021); India One group before-after, no control 2 months Quantitative surveys Multiple; Not reported 0–6 years Not reported 83 caregivers Not reported
Chaudhry (2023); Pakistan RCT with treatment as usual No follow-up Quantitative surveys and IDI Multiple; Clinician determined 3–6 years Not reported Test = 13 caregivers
Control = 13 caregivers
Interviews = 7 parents
Clinic
Del Pilar Saa (2020); Guatemala RCT, longitudinal mixed 2–3 months Quantitative surveys and observation Multiple; Not reported 18 months to 4 years 92% male None School and community venues
Estupiñan Vives (2017); Colombia Programme evaluation Not reported Observation Multiple; Not reported 7–9 years Not reported None Community venues
Favazza (2016); Kenya One group before-after, no control No follow-up Quantitative surveys and IDI Intellectual, cerebral palsy and autism; Not specified 3.4–6.5 years M = 14
F = 4
18 caregivers School, clinic and community venues
Gebrael (2011); Brazil Controlled before-after Not reported Quantitative surveys and observation Visual; Researcher determined 4–6 years Not reported 10 teachers School
González Moreno (2017); Mexico One group before-after, no control and programme evaluation Not reported Quantitative surveys and observation Down syndrome; Self-report 7 years Not reported None School
Gurgel (2014); Brazil Qualitative No follow-up IDI Not reported (recruited from a rehabilitation institute for children with disabilities) 3–6 years M = 4 6 Clinic
Irawan (2023); Indonesia One group before-after, no control No follow-up Quantitative surveys Physical; Medical records and Pre-Screening Development Questionnaire 3–6 years M = 8
F = 12
None School
Jacob (2021); Nigeria Controlled before-after No follow-up Quantitative surveys Multiple; Clinician determined Mean age = 11.6 years Music (M = 8, F = 7)
Pictorial (M = 8, F = 7)
Control (M = 9, F = 8)
None School
Lynch (2018); Malawi Longitudinal mixed methods and programme evaluation 0.5 months Mixed method Visual; Researcher determined through registration records 0.75–6 years M = 15
F = 15
26 caregivers Home
Oliveira (2009); Brazil Programme evaluation Not reported Quantitative surveys and IDI and FGD Cerebral palsy; Not specified 5–10 years All Male None Community venues
Pirnazar (2022); Iran Controlled before-after No follow-up Quantitative surveys Multiple; School file 8–12 years All Female None School
Rerkmoung (2024); Thailand RCT with treatment as usual 1 month Quantitative surveys Cerebral palsy; Not specified 7–2 years Not reported None School
Rico-Olarte (2017); Colombia One group before-after, no control No follow-up Quantitative surveys, IDI, observation Multiple; Not specified 6–10 years Not reported None Shopping mall
Ríos-Rincón (2016); Colombia One group before-after, no control 1 month Quantitative surveys Multiple; Researcher determined 4–9 years M = 3
F = 1
4 caregivers Clinic and home
Rodríguez García (2023); Cuba Programme evaluation Not reported Quantitative surveys and observation Visual; Not specified 6–8 years M = 5
F = 2
None School
Sant (2024); India One group before-after, no control No follow-up Quantitative surveys Hemiplegic cerebral palsy; University of Michigan PSQ 4–12 years F = 3
M = 3
None School
Zerihun (2024); Ethiopia Qualitative No follow-up IDI and FGD Intellectual and autism; Not specified 2–9 years M = 11
F = 8
19 caregivers, 15 community leaders Community venues

IDI, in-depth interview; FGD, focus group discussion; RCD, randomized control trials.