Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 3;16:1632246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1632246

Table 5.

Logistic regression analyses (a, b) (n = 80).

Dependent variable Suicide attempt
a. Independent variables (enter method) Beta SE p OR %95 CI of OR
Lower Upper
Constant −0.131 2.248 0.954 0.036
Sex −1.603 0.747 0.032 4.968 1.149 21.487
Age 0.001 0.037 0.984 1.001 0.931 1.076
Mature defense style −0.004 0.023 0.853 0.996 0.951 1.042
Neurotic defense style −0.060 0.031 0.057 0.942 0.886 1.002
Immature defense style 0.035 0.014 0.014 1.035 1.007 1.065
b. Independent variables
(forward stepwise method)
Model 1
Constant −3.188 0.926 0.001 0.041
Projection 0.189 0.070 0.007 1.208 1.053 1.386
Model 2
Constant −1.623 1.191 0.173 0.012
Sex −1.404 0.711 0.048 4.071 1.009 16.415
Projection 0.202 0.740 0.006 1.224 1.059 1.414

Dependent: variable: history of suicide attempt (yes/no).

a. Independent variables: sex, age, mature defense style, neurotic defense style, immature defense style.

Model 1: Nagelkerke R2 = 0.229 (p < 0.05).

b. Independent variables: sex, age, all defense mechanisms.

Model 1: Nagelkerke R2 = 0.143 (p < 0.05).

Model 2: Nagelkerke R2 = 0.216 (p < 0.05).

SE, standard error; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Values of p < 0.05 were accepted as significant and marked in bold.