Skip to main content
. 2025 Jun 28;59(5):1032–1041. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00824-9

Table 2.

Perceived hurdles when using reliance

% of positive responses Number of responses
Additional administrative requirements/documents including local M1 and other local documents 66% 27
Unredacted assessment report 54% 22
No clear reliance guideline or reliance not practiced 51% 21
Strict interpretation of product sameness 44% 18
No regulatory framework allowing reliance 41% 17
No Confidentiality Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding between reference authority and relying authority 34% 14
No clear understanding of reliance definition or no acceleration of timelines 24% 10
Not enough Reference Authorities to apply reliance or restricted scope 17% 7
Long submission lag time 15% 6
Difficulties in accepting eCPP 7% 3
None of the above or other 2% 1