Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 5;10(9):2937–2942. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2025.06.053

Table 2.

Key elements related to engagement between CKDu stakeholders other than the communities affected by CKDu

Stakeholders Key Points
Researchers engaged in North-South collaboration
  • -

    Geography-independent equity between research collaborators is necessary throughout the research process, from conceptualization, to financial remuneration, to data use, publication, and intellectual property development.

  • -

    Public accountability and transparency must be prioritized, especially around possible intellectual or financial conflicts of interest and future data use.

  • -

    When specimens and data are stored outside the original setting, governance structures for future use of these specimens should have representation from the original setting, such as through inclusion of a local ethics committee or advisory board.

  • -

    International researchers and sponsors should contribute to local capacity building for research and research oversight.

  • -

    Ensure that both North and South partners have access to adequate resources, including funding, equipment, and expertise.

  • -

    Recognize the expertise and local knowledge that Southern partners bring to the table.

Researchers and industries whose workers are affected by CKDu
  • -

    Researchers should fully consider worker-employer power dynamics of conducting research among workers at a worksite, with industry engagement (e.g., by not sharing individual participant results with the employer).

  • -

    CKDu research conducted in conjunction with industry must also include commitments from industry to address the disease risk factors identified.

  • -

    When industry funding is involved, research must maintain scientific integrity and independence and the funding source cannot influence analysis or the publication of findings.

  • -

    Clear plans to translate occupational research findings into tangible benefits for the affected workforce are necessary.

  • -

    Industries linked to CKDu should screen to prevent already sick workers from developing worsening disease. Individuals screened out should receive further assistance from the industry, although a number of questions on the specifics of this remain.

Researchers and health care systems caring for patients with CKDu
  • -

    Clear lines of communication and referral to health care providers must be established by researchers before beginning CKDu research.

  • -

    Limited local health care capacity to care for patients with CKDu should not deter identification of CKDu cases; efforts should be made to connect patients to regional or national care networks where local capacity does not exist.

  • -

    Avoid implementing experimental treatments for patients with CKDu without robust evidence of their efficacy and safety.

  • -
    The unknowns of CKDu do not prevent health care systems from caring for these patients. Patients with CKDu may benefit from:
    • -
      Treatment of comorbid conditions
    • -
      Counseling to avoid known risk factors for CKD
    • -
      Counseling to avoid known risk factors for CKD progression, including nephrotoxic medications
    • -
      Treatment of the sequelae of CKD, including anemia, hyperuricemia, and electrolyte imbalances.
Researchers and governments whose citizens are affected by CKDu
  • -

    Researchers should use their expertise to advocate for evidence-based health care policy and prioritization of CKDu care.

  • -

    Researchers should engage with governments in capacity building for CKDu related public health and medical care infrastructure.

  • -

    Researchers should report potential environmental hazards identified to appropriate government agencies.

CKD, chronic kidney disease; CKDu, CKD of unknown etiology.