Table 2.
Comparison of mode of delivery, amniotic fluid index (AFI), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission rates among the AEDF (+), AEDF (–), and control groups
| Groups | p | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mode of Delivery | AEDF + | AEDF - | Control | Total | 0,147 | |
| Primary Cesarean Section | 33 (%70.2) | 26 (%46.4) | 66 (%57.9) | 125 (%57.6) | ||
| Previous Cesarean Section | 10 (%21.3) | 18 (%32.1) | 24 (%21.1) | 52 (%24) | ||
| Induced Labor | 4 (%8.5) | 12 (%21.4) | 24 (%21.1) | 40 (%18.4) | ||
| AFI | Normal | 38a (%80.9) | 46a (%82.1) | 114b (%100) | 198 (%91.2) | 0,001** |
| Oligohydramnios | 7a (%14.9) | 10a (%17.9) | 0b (%0) | 17 (%7.8) | ||
| Polyhydramnios | 2a (%4.3) | 0a (%0) | 0a (%0) | 2 (%0.9) | ||
| NICU | No | 9a (%19.1) | 32b (%57.1) | 96c (%84.2) | 137 (%63.1) | 0,001** |
| Yes | 38a (%80.9) | 24b (%42.9) | 18c (%15.8) | 80 (%36.9) | ||
Chi-square test **p < 0.01