Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Sep 19;20(9):e0331453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331453

Perspectives of multidisciplinary healthcare providers in elderly daycare centres: Challenges, opportunities and impacts on geriatric care in Chiangrai Municipality, Thailand

Paralee Opasanunt 1,¤, Panitsara Leekuan 1,¤,*
Editor: Le An Pham2
PMCID: PMC12449021  PMID: 40971947

Abstract

The global surge in the ageing population has intensified pressure on healthcare delivery systems, leading to a heightened demand for elderly daycare services. This demographic shift necessitates innovative approaches to meet the complex needs of older adults, including expanding community-based care options. Elderly daycare centers play a crucial role in comprehensive geriatric care by offering services. Understanding how healthcare providers experience their work in Elderly Daycare Centres is essential for improving both service quality and staff preservation. This study seeks the experiences of these providers to understanding of meanings healthcare professionals assign to challenges they face, the successful practices they employ, and highlight opportunities for enhancement within geriatric care.

Interpretative phenomenology influenced by Heidegger’s philosophy in qualitative research was conducted. Thirteen semi-structured interviews and narrative accounts with multidisciplinary healthcare providers from four Elderly Daycare Centres were collected and analysed, and interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Multidisciplinary healthcare providers discovered four key aspects of their experience while delivering services in the first two programs (the Muscle Strengthening Program and the Nutrition Program for individuals with nutritional deficiencies): Opportunities in policy implementation, Challenging experience, Enhancing organisational effectiveness and engaging support, and Reflections on Program Outcomes and Impacts. All findings mirrored the value and impact of providing healthcare services in Elderly Daycare Centres on the experiences of healthcare providers from various disciplines. Elderly Daycare Centres not only provide healthcare services that offer emotional support but also positively influence seniors’ mental and physical well-being. Multidisciplinary healthcare providers caring for older adults encounter various experiences shaped by the complexities of aging populations. Support of this nature will heighten awareness of the difficulties elderly individuals encounter and advance potential solutions. Therefore, healthcare professionals stressed the need for a more holistic and coordinated care framework to improve both the delivery of services and health outcomes for elderly individuals.

1 Introduction

The population aged 60 or older will represent 22 percent of the world’s total population in 2050. Additionally, the average life expectancy for those reaching 60 years of age is going to increase to 30 years [1]. This demographic shift underscores the growing importance of elderly daycare centres and healthcare professionals in providing affordable care as essential components of sustainable healthcare systems worldwide [2]. According to the current situation, it has been estimated that the elderly population worldwide, including in Thailand, is continuously increasing. In 2040, Thailand will have an elderly population of up to 21.4 million people (31.3 percent) of the country’s population [3]. The rapidly ageing population worldwide has increased pressure on health services delivery arrangements and the demand for elderly day care services.

In Thailand, the 1997 Constitution, Section 80, mandates that the state support the elderly, the impoverished, individuals with disabilities, and the underprivileged to ensure an excellent quality of life and self-reliance [4]. The 11th National Economic and Social Development Plan (2012– 2016) also emphasized the importance of community participation at all levels—local, regional, and national—in formulating strategies to achieve a society characterized by happiness, equality, fairness, and resilience to change. In terms of allowances to elderly individuals who are unable to care for themselves and lack support from their children. The state offers free medical treatment to the elderly, along with assistance and knowledge in various areas. Services include home visits by nurses, visits by volunteers and social workers to converse with older people, and establishing elderly clubs or associations. These initiatives aim to educate, clarify, and promote mental health, offering care within and outside hospital settings. The care models for older people in Thailand have been developed to address various needs, encompassing both medical and social aspects. These diverse care models aim to address the multifaceted needs of older people in Thai communities, ensuring they receive appropriate support and maintain a good quality of life. These models include home visits, Home health care, Community-based service (Day Care Centers and Elderly Clubs), Home care service, Community-based service providers, and Elderly care facilities [5].

Elderly Daycare Centres represent a crucial intervention in addressing these disparities by providing services that promote physical health, cognitive stimulation, and social connection for older adults across diverse socioeconomic backgrounds in comprehensive geriatric care [6]. Elderly care services in community day care centers primarily provide daily and spiritual comfort. The demand for these services is influenced by various factors, including age, education level, income source, availability of caregivers, satisfaction with services, and the individual’s ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL). Implementing timely nursing care policies and measures that address these factors is essential to enhance elderly care [7]. The elderly adults are given care, medical assistance, emotional support, aid, advice, and a space where they meet others in similar situations. The day care centre also acts as an outlet for senior citizens to spend time and indulge in recreation activities, outings and gatherings [6].

Healthcare professionals in day care facilities for the elderly navigate a distinctive set of challenges and possibilities when providing high-quality care to older adults. These dedicated centres function as essential community assets, delivering organized therapeutic programs, social interaction opportunities, and temporary relief for caregivers while meeting the intricate requirements of seniors who need oversight but do not require around-the-clock residential services [8,9]. The role of healthcare providers in these settings extends beyond traditional clinical responsibilities. Staff members often develop meaningful relationships with attendees, becoming attuned to subtle physical and cognitive health changes while fostering an environment that promotes dignity, independence, and quality of life. Their experiences offer valuable insights into the practical realities of geriatric care delivery and the evolving landscape of community-based elder services [9].

The rising proportion of older adults has positioned elderly daycare centers as critical components of community-based care, offering crucial services that facilitate continued independent living and mitigate the need for institutionalisation. An integrated theoretical framework drawing upon Person-Centered Care (PCC), Activity Theory (AT), and Organizational Support Theory (OST) allows for an examination of the individual, interpersonal, and organizational dimensions of care delivery. These three theories are not independent but are interdependent, thereby forming a potent and integrated framework: Person-Centered Care (PCC): McCormack’s [10] initial four concepts, central to person-centered practice, have been expanded to include the crucial dimensions of being in relation, the social world, place, and self. These additions provide a more comprehensive framework for understanding and implementing person-centered care [10]. PCC is an approach to care grounded in philosophical and ethical principles. It arranges the individual by focusing on the distinctive values, preferences, needs, and inherent strengths [11]. These relationships encompass all care providers, service users, and their significant others. This approach is also anchored by core values, including respect for individuals, the right to self-determination, mutual respect, and shared understanding. PCC Framework highlights four key components: prerequisites (provider attributes), the care environment, person-centered processes, and expected outcomes. It is widely acknowledged as the standard for high-quality care in geriatric contexts. PCC also shapes the professional philosophies and goals of all care providers, including nurses, social workers, therapists, and activity coordinators. Understanding their individual perspectives is crucial, as these insights reveal how they interpret, understand, and ultimately strive to implement PCC in their daily practice. Activity Theory (AT) [12]: Activity Theory pleases as a crucial framework for comprehending successful ageing and the significant role of elderly daycare centers in fostering continued engagement among older adults.This theory emphasises that an individual’s psychological and social needs persist throughout their lifespan. It further suggests that a reduction in activity during older age often stems from societal impediments rather than personal preference or a decline in ability. In the context of elderly daycare centers, healthcare providers are essential in facilitating activity for older adults. They help these individuals navigate age-related changes while simultaneously supporting their sense of purpose and social connections. Organisational Support Theory (OST) [13]: OST examines the impact of organisational factors on employee well-being, job satisfaction, and performance.It proposes that employees develop a general sense of how much their organisation values their work and well-being. In a daycare setting, the overall organizational environment—including management, available resources, and workplace culture—directly affects how well and how consistently providers can do their jobs. Ultimately, if providers feel supported by their organisation, it will boost their motivation, engagement, and willingness to excel in their roles. The WHO emphasizes that aging intersects significantly with numerous Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly in enhancing the functional abilities of older adults [14]. Specifically, Goal 3 aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all ages by achieving universal health coverage, which includes financial risk protection. Additionally, Goal 10 focuses on reducing inequalities within and among countries by fostering the social, political, and economic inclusion of all individuals, regardless of age. The right to health is also one of the human rights, inseparably connected with the ethical principles of human dignity and social justice. This standpoint is represented and anchored in numerous international treaties, i.e., the Universal Declaration of Human Rights [15] and the Constitution of the World Health Organization [16].

Despite the rapidly increasing ageing population, healthcare services for older people in the community remain unorganised and care facilities inadequate. These challenges are limited research focusing specifically on the experiences of healthcare providers in daycare settings. Understanding the experiences of healthcare providers in the settings is crucial for improving service quality and staff retention. This study aims to enhance understanding of healthcare providers’ experiences in the Elderly Daycare centres, informing improvements in practice and policy.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Research design

Interpretative phenomenological study questioned the experiences of healthcare providers working in the Elderly Daycare Centres in order to bring out what is usually hidden human experience and in human relations. This method goes beyond the descriptive in looking for the meaning hidden in the narratives and assists in the understanding of how individuals make sense of their work experience as well as understanding the perspectives of multidisciplinary healthcare providers in Elderly Daycare Centres.

Using purposive sampling, 13 healthcare providers (e.g. nurses, healthcare professionals and public health technical officers) delivering care to older people at the Elderly Daycare Centres were interviewed in Thai. They was also done based on their experiences working in Elderly Daycare Center. Informed consent was taken from the participants before the interviews. Face- to- face interviews were held with all participants in a private room at their workplace in order to support their comfort in sharing personal experiences and insights about their work. Inclusion criteria: o To be the core multidisciplinary team (nurses, care assistants, allied health professionals) o Have been employed in Chiangrai Municipality o Responsible for maintaining consistent care services in the Elderly Day Care Centres. Exclusion criteria: o External consultants to the Elderly Day Care Centres.

2.2 Setting

All healthcare providers from four Elderly Daycare Centres in Chiangrai municipality, Chiangrai province, Thailand were selected to share their experiences in delivering care to older people.

2.3 Data collection

This study protocol was approved by the University of Phayao Human Ethics Committee (Thailand) prior to the commencement of data collection (HREC- UP- HSST 1.2/043/67). Prior to conducting interviews, the researchers approached the management of elderly daycare service to understand management perspectives in elderly care settings. The principle researcher (PO) contacted potential participants to ask the screening questions again to verify that potential participants met the inclusion criteria and to confirm their willingness to take part. Participants gave their informed consent to participate voluntarily after receiving full explanation about their right to anonymity and to refuse or subsequently withdraw from the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants using standardised consent forms which were signed and dated by both the participant and the principle investigator (PO) prior to the arranging and conducting interviews. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interview guide.

The development of our interview guide followed a structured, multi-stage approach that drew upon established theoretical foundations while remaining attentive to real-world applications. We began by undertaking an extensive review of existing literature on collaborative practice among healthcare professionals working with older adults. This review revealed five critical areas that shaped our initial question development: how professionals understand and articulate their roles, the establishment of frameworks for overseeing healthcare delivery systems, the capacity and effectiveness of organisations, challenges related to distributing resources, and outcomes to furnish to the older persons.

Open-ended narratives also captured the depth of individual experiences. The interviews were recorded using a recorder. The interviews lasted around 60 to 90 minutes each. Filed notes were written after observation in each interview. The interviews were conducted between 24 March 2024 to 30 June 2024. No further interviews were conducted as soon as data saturation was reached.

2.4 Reflexivity

This reflexive examination of our positionality as Thai geriatric nurse researchers reveals how professional expertise, cultural background, and linguistic context simultaneously strengthened and potentially biased our research approach. Our nursing specialisation provided insider understanding of multidisciplinary healthcare dynamics while potentially creating bias toward nursing perspectives and collaborative care assumptions. Prior to undertaking this study, the researchers developed preliminary conceptual models of elder daycare management, informed by a review of existing literature in healthcare management, social care and ageing theory. The literature consistently emphasises that effective management in geriatric care settings plays a critical role in determining the quality of care and services provided to older adults. Thai cultural values emphasizing elder respect, family-centred care, and hierarchical relationships may have predisposed us toward viewing certain care approaches favourably. The researchers not only conducted this research in Thai language facilitated authentic participant expression but also created shared cultural assumptions requiring careful examination. Our policy background enhanced understanding of systemic influences while potentially over-emphasising structural factors in interpretation.

To address these biases, we implemented systematic mitigation strategies including reflexive journaling, interdisciplinary peer debriefing, discipline-specific member checking, dis-confirming evidence searches, and cultural reflexivity practices. These approaches enhanced research trustworthiness while maintaining transparency about our interpretive influence. Our cultural and professional insider status, when combined with systematic bias awareness and mitigation, enhanced rather than compromised research quality by enabling nuanced understanding while maintaining analytical rigour. This transparency provides readers with clear context for interpreting our findings within the Thai healthcare environment while contributing valuable insights to international geriatric care literature.

2.5 Data analysis

The ATLAS.ti software program was used to manage the data and coding. The interviews were conducted in Thai and transcribed verbatim. Employing the hermeneutic circle as a methodological cornerstone, a foundational principle of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), the researchers engaged in an ongoing interpretive process that involved a reciprocal movement individual accounts. This process allowed for a deeper understanding of how multidisciplinary healthcare providers interpret their experiences in the Elderly Daycare centres, particularly in relation to team dynamics, professional roles, and institutional structures. The data was analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) followed the steps initially identified by Manen [17] and Smith, Flowers & Larkin [18]:

The initial phase of the analysis involved a continuous process of reading and rereading the transcripts, which was sustained throughout the entire data analysis. During this process, the principle researcher consistently revisited the original texts while engaging in coding and interpretation, critically reflecting on the data by asking questions such as, “What does this reveal about the phenomenon?” and “How is this connected to geriatric care?” This approach aligns with interpretive phenomenological methodology to enhance the depth and rigour of the analysis and to ensure a clear audit trail. The principle researcher identified meaning units within each interview transcript. These texts were meticulously examined to capture the participants’ perspectives on the phenomenon under investigation. Individual attitudes and experiences were precisely coded, and codes reflecting related aspects of the phenomenon were then grouped into relating sub-themes. During the coding process, a funnelling approach was applied to manage the large volume of initial codes, allowing for the refinement and exclusion of codes deemed unrelated or lacking analytical relevance at later stages. Analytical memos were used to document reflections drawn from field notes and the reflexive journal for each interview, capturing insights from the day of data collection to develop a comprehensive understanding of each healthcare providers’ experience.

Through further analysis, the codes appeared to be saying the same thing about particular phenomena. These codes were grouped under certain categories or sub-themes based on the importance of aim and objectives. Once these sub-themes were explored, facilitating the emergence of broader themes that provided a coherent and nuanced interpretation of participants’ experiences. A member-checking process was employed to clarify any discrepancies in interpretation, during which feedback and suggestions were solicited from the interpretation team on a finalised draft.

2.6 The rigour of the study

Data reliability and validity were assessed using the concepts of credibility, dependability, confirmability and transferability in increasing the trustworthiness of this study.

Credibility: Purposive sampling was used to choose individuals who possessed direct experiences of the phenomena under investigation and were eager to share their narratives, ensuring credibility. Building trust can also be achieved through the participant and researcher developing a relationship throughout the course of the interview. To ensure accuracy and credibility of the data, member checking was conducted by returning interview transcripts to participants, who were invited to review and correct any mistakes or misinterpretations.The hermeneutic process presented challenges, particularly in determining when interpretation had reached sufficient depth. The concept of ’interpretive saturation’—defined as the point at which successive analyses yield no new or meaningful insights. This was operationalized through repeated interpretive cycles, and saturation was considered achieved.

Dependability: An external evaluator to assess the analysed data, ensuring that no critical elements were overlooked during the data collection and analysis process. Data from several data collection processes such as interviews, observations and written field notes were used and all analytical data were linked to serve understanding of the phenomena of geriatric care in Elderly Daycare Centres.

Confirmability: The principle researcher maintained a reflexive journal, recording thoughts and reflections both before and immediately after each interview, as well as taking notes during the interviews. This practice aimed to mitigate potential biases. The reflexive journal served as a tool to document the researcher’s evolving insights, emotions, and conceptualisations throughout the study, contributing to the transparency and rigour of the research process. This level of transparency enables readers to form their own interpretations of the findings and apply their own preconceptions to the analysis. Furthermore, two experts in qualitative research independently audited all aspects of the research process, documentation, and preliminary findings to ensure the credibility and dependability of the study.

Transferability: While the findings of this study are context-specific and not inherently generalisable, they are presented in a manner that enables readers to assess their relevance and potentially apply them meaningfully to their own experiences and professional contexts. During the research process, the principal researcher recognised that certain experiences described by participants resembled those previously observed in other healthcare providers prior to the study. This resemblance was deemed valid and suggests that the insights shared by participants may hold relevance for other multidisciplinary healthcare professionals working with similar populations.

3 Results

3.1 Demographic characteristics

A total of 13 healthcare providers from four Elderly Daycare Centres participated in this study in Chiangrai Municipality, Chiangrai province. Most participants were female (84.62 percent) and male (15.38 percent), with the ages of 20 to 30 (38.46 percent), 31 to 40 (38.46 percent), and 41 to 50 (23.08 percent). Participants represented a broad range of primary healthcare providers, including Registered Nurses (61.54 percent), Healthcare professionals (23.08 percent) and public health technical officers (15.38 percent). Most participants had less than 4 years of experience (76.92 percent) and over than 10 years of experience (23.08 percent) in their current working role (Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic details of participants.

Participants N %
Position
- Registered Nurse 8 61.54
- Healthcare professional 3 23.08
- Public health technical officer 2 15.38
Gender
- Female 11 84.62
- Male 2 15.38
Age (year)
- 20-30 5 38.46
- 31-40 5 38.46
- 41-50 3 23.08
Experience
- less than 4 years 10 76.92
- over than 10 years 3 23.08

3.2 Perspectives of multidisciplinary healthcare providers in Elderly Daycare Centres

The initial two programs were created in four Elderly Daycare centres, such as the muscle strengthening program and the nutrition program for individuals with nutritional problems.

3.2.1 Theme 1: Opportunities in policy implementation.

Healthcare providers viewed government policies as flexible guides for their care, not as rigid rules. This finding shows that structured reflection is a key part of Organizational Support Theory. Instead of following mandates as unchangeable commands, providers used them as a starting point, modifying them based on older adults’ needs, available resources, and their own judgment. This approach made providers feel more valued and supported, boosting morale and their sense of purpose in their work. It perfectly illustrated how the mandate was not a directive to be followed blindly, but a guide to be applied thoughtfully, with the ultimate goal of older adults well-being in mind.

Health service delivery.

The initial point of providing care for older adults in Elderly Daycare Centres is to implement a policy to provide services for older people and allow them access to comprehensive care services.

The policy has been implemented into a program with clear weekly work assignments. We hold meetings before activities begin and weekly review meetings to discuss the outcomes of activities, which helps us identify strengths and areas for improvement, allowing us to adjust for better results (Nurse 2)

The management’s policy aimed at reducing inequality among older people has been transformed into a practical program with visible physical results and impacts on the mental well-being of elderly participants who engage in social activities (Nurse 3)

Providing multidisciplinary care services.

The experiences of healthcare providers at the Elderly Daycare Centres, as shared through a series of in-depth interviews, revealed a complex and nuanced relationship with the government mandates that govern their daily practice. The providers didn’t ignoring government mandates, but instead are using their professional judgment to adapt them so they can provide the best possible care for each person. They explained how challenging it is to apply a single set of rules to a diverse group of older adults, each with unique needs. The providers felt a deep sense of responsibility to find a balance between keeping everyone safe and respecting the individual dignity and needs of the people they care for. This connects directly to the core tenets of OST, which is about workers’ generalized belief that the organization values their contributions and cares about their well-being.

Healthcare providers in primary care defined how they used a collaborative team approach to provide holistic care for older adults through programs. All providers included various specialists, such as nurses, healthcare professionals and public health technical officers, who worked together to ensure holistic treatment and support for older adults through coordinated programs.

I was assigned to organize movement programs and design exercises to increase muscle strength in older people and improve their balance. The recreational activities are collaboratively managed by nurses and public health academics. Other staff members at the centre also help with the program whenever they are available (Healthcare professional 1)

There is joint planning for activities, with group meetings held before and after each session to review results and improve future sessions. In the pre-event meeting, we set up the venue, coordinated with relevant parties, and confirmed attendance with the elderly participants. The activities involve collaboration with various healthcare professionals, such as public health academics, nutritionists, physiotherapists, and other staff at the center who assist with registration, as well as snack and lunch preparation. (Nurse 2)

Continuous proactive healthcare service.

Providing healthcare services in two programs implemented preventive measures and health promotion activities. The group health activities within these programs created meaningful experiences for participants, fostering social connections while enabling them to gain knowledge through interactive learning sessions.

To ensure care delivery can flex and adapt, well-organised weekly team meetings were comprehensive Clinical Learning Systems.During these multidisciplinary gatherings, healthcare providers collectively reviewed the previous week’s care outcomes. This process involved a thoughtful reflection on actions taken and their subsequent impact, fostering both professional growth and a deeper sense of purpose in their practice. The implementation of regular weekly planning and reflection sessions created a continuous feedback loop that substantially enhanced the quality and consistency of care protocol delivery.

We develop strategies each week to prevent the elderly from getting bored or losing interest in the program by organizing fun recreational activities that are different each week. We use the LINE application to communicate with older people and provide videos for them to review their exercise routines at home. If elderly participants cannot attend the program, they can review what they have already learned to build upon their training in the following week. (Healthcare professional 1)

The strategy used in organising recreational activities and providing knowledge that the elderly need has proven practical and effective. This makes the program interesting, and older people remain interested and enthusiastic about participating in activities continuously. (Nurse 1)

Created community healthcare networks.

Community healthcare volunteers and caregivers (CGs) work as the community health network. They demonstrated adequate capacity and capabilities to effectively support and sustain the program’s activities. They also aided during exercise and nutrition sessions.

Community healthcare volunteers have varying levels of capability, while others are not. Participation in the program is voluntary, but most are cooperative in organizing activities. Overall, the community health network has sufficient capacity to support the program’s activities. (Nurse 1)

Community healthcare volunteers and caregivers (CGs) assist in movement programs by supporting older people during exercises, ensuring the safety of those at risk of falling, and monitoring elderly participants. They also help follow up with elderly individuals who cannot be reached. (Healthcare professional 1)

3.2.2 Theme 2: Challenging experience.

Delivered healthcare service in two programs was a novel experience for healthcare providers, particularly in-home care visits.

As a new nurse, I was given the opportunity to work as a program manager, presenting the program to colleagues and listening to everyone’s opinions. It was a challenging experience because I had never done it before. There were both fun moments and problems to solve, and it was something new to learn from. (Nurse 1)

During each week’s program activities, we provide education about movement, exercise, and medication knowledge, along with recreational activities to keep the atmosphere from becoming too tense. The three of us also conduct home visits to assess environmental risks within their homes that could lead to falls and accidents. Our home visits were new experiences of my duties. I felt I could do my duties outside the workplace. (Healthcare professional 1)

Transforming heavy work into entertaining activities.

As healthcare providers carried out their duties in a way that made them feel less burdensome, these responsibilities transformed into rewarding aspects of their work and became more like enjoyable performances. After being assigned to implement program activities, I’ve grown to enjoy and have fun with the work. I’ve become someone who enjoys doing activities, even though I didn’t like them before. (Public Health Academic Officer 1)

The elderly said that it’s not difficult at all to choose both the type and appropriate amount of food for themselves. For us as service providers, what started as feeling tired and worried about lack of cooperation has transformed into having fun every time we organize activities. The positive outcomes we see in the elderly have become our motivation. The elderly are encouraged to continue and are willing to participate in every activities. (Healthcare professional 2)

3.2.3 Theme 3: Enhancing organisational effectiveness and engaging support.

The findings from this study reveal that the organisational framework of the Elderly Daycare Centres significantly impacts staff motivation and the effectiveness of interprofessional collaboration. Elderly Daycare Centres managed by a director, with distinct teams for nursing, caregiving, and social work. Within this structure, nurses and other healthcare providers tend to operate with a high degree of autonomy, independently managing their respective professional duties. Nurses and other healthcare providers operated largely independently within their own professional roles and took responsibility for different aspects of this holistic care plan.

In essence, interpretation reveals that institutional structures are not neutral containers for healthcare delivery but active forces that shape the professional experiences, motivations, and collaborative capacities of healthcare providers. Effective institutional design, therefore, requires a recognition of this dynamic relationship and the intentional creation of structures that support both individual professional fulfillment and collective effectiveness in older adults’ care.

Improving an organisation’s ability to operate effectively and achieve programs’ goals involves better resource management, staff training, technology adoption, and streamlined operations to maximize efficiency and effectiveness. The programs combine education, recreation, and hands-on practice to create an enjoyable and beneficial experience for elderly participants. Family involvement further encourages participation, fostering social engagement and improved health. Regular follow-ups, home visits, and pharmacist support enhance the program’s effectiveness, ensuring that elderly individuals receive continuous care and guidance.

The program integrates recreational activities with education and hands-on practice, making the sessions enjoyable.The elderly particularly enjoy recreational activities. There are review sessions and supplementary activities for elderly participants who miss some weeks, ensuring they receive the program’s full benefits. However, only a few miss sessions, and they usually return to the program as usual. Families also play a role in encouraging older people to join the activities, as they want them to engage socially, avoid loneliness, and improve their health. (Nurse 3)

The duration of each program is appropriate, with regular follow-ups and scheduling through the Line application. During the program, home visits are conducted for periodic evaluations. I also visited to monitor medication use, helping elderly participants better understand their medications. (Healthcare professional 3)

Knowledge management.

Nurses and academic staff are primarily responsible for leading activities. Some community health volunteers or caregivers (CGs) can conduct recreational activities, but only a few. Some are hesitant or have never done it before, making it more challenging. (Nurse 7)

The team has sufficient knowledge, including nurses, public health academics, and a pharmacist who provides excellent medication guidance. Before each program, we meet to discuss and assign tasks, determining who will be the main speaker and who will lead the recreational activities that week. By working together, no single person is overwhelmed. Over time, we found it enjoyable, and the elderly participants had fun with us, too. (Healthcare professional 1)

Program-based training for elderly care.

Encouragement of training and regulatory practices for healthcare providers fosters continuous self- improvement, enabling them to deliver enhanced care services for the elderly. The participants emphasised the importance of training a diverse group of health and general personnel to manage the care of older individuals, particularly in response to health challenges. Healthcare providers should prioritise addressing the health concerns of older adults by developing the necessary skills and competencies to offer effective care.

Before implementing the program, we collaborated with educational institutions to train on the use of the program, as well as to assess and screen elderly individuals for participation. This increased knowledge and boosted confidence in delivering healthcare services according to the specific programs outlined. Additionally, home visits were conducted by a multidisciplinary team, including nurses, public health professionals, nutritionist, physical therapist, and pharmacist. This collaboration led to a clear and unified goal in promoting the health of elderly individuals at risk of falls and those with nutritional issues. (Nurse 8)

I participated in the program, which was guided by experts from educational institutions to assess elderly individuals at risk of falls. The program included activities to strengthen muscles, followed by the implementation of the planned activities and post-program evaluations. The training made the role of the physical therapist clearer and more defined, and it instilled a sense of pride in fulfilling my professional role in caring for elderly individuals at risk. (Healthcare professional 1)

Facility accessibility and adaptations.

This category focuses on the challenges and adjustments made to accommodate elderly program participants. Although the space is limited and not fully accessible, modifications are being made to enhance the facility’s usability. These include adjusting the layout for specific activities and ongoing renovations to improve the activity space, such as converting it into a glass-enclosed room.

The center has made improvements to the facility to accommodate the program better. However, space is somewhat limited. The room has air conditioning and fans, but no handrails or ramps make it difficult for elderly participants to enter. The restrooms are in separate buildings not too far, but for elderly individuals with mobility issues, community health volunteers need to assist them. (Nurse 7)

Initially, the program was conducted in an open space, but when the weather became too hot, we moved to an air-conditioned room on the second floor. There were concerns about whether the elderly participants could access it easily. However, they were willing and happy to go upstairs. Since then, we have continued holding activities in the second-floor room. (Healthcare professional 1)

3.2.4 Theme 4: Reflections on program outcomes and impacts.

Enhancing accessibility and participation for the Elderly Providing transportation services for elderly individuals enhances their ability to participate in activities, reducing barriers related to mobility, cost, and dependence on others. Consistent participation in these programs leads to noticeable improvements in physical health and mobility, encouraging more elderly individuals to join and benefit from the experience.

The transportation service for elderly individuals allows those who cannot travel on their own to participate in activities consistently. Without this service, many elderly individuals would miss the opportunity to join the program. (Nurse 1)

Having a transportation service for older people makes it easier for them to join activities without worrying about travel, costs, or relying on family members for transportation. (Nurse 3)

Promoting physical and mental well-being.

Healthcare providers described the improvements in the physical health and mental well-being of elderly participants. The program also led to increased mobility, weight changes, and better blood sugar levels, resulting in a sense of satisfaction and encouragement to others to join. Older people also experienced mental benefits, feeling motivated by their progress. Healthcare providers also benefited by expanding their knowledge and skills. Additionally, strong collaboration from other centre staffs, who assisted with registration, venue setup, and maintaining order, contributed to the program’s success.

The outcomes can be seen in two aspects. First, the elderly participants experienced significant physical and mental improvements; they felt impressed and encouraged others to join the program. Second, the service providers also benefited by expanding and developing their own knowledge. Additionally, there was strong cooperation from other centre staffs who helped with registration, venue setup, and maintaining order. (Nurse 2)

The elderly participants who joined the program showed clear improvements in their daily lives. For example, those who previously had difficulty walking could walk more easily and even drive after participating in the program. Some who experience positive results from participating in the program encourage others to join because they notice improvements in their physical condition and mobility after joining. (Nurse 6)

Maintaining a sharp mental faculty is as vital as being physically active.

The outcomes reflected by the elderly participants show the benefits they gained from the program. Their happiness comes from improved mobility. Those who once struggled to walk can now move more easily. They also enjoy meeting others with similar challenges, conversing, and receiving valuable advice. As for the service providers, our happiness comes from seeing older people change their behaviors, improve their mobility, lose weight, and lower their blood sugar levels. (Nurse 3)

The program activities have motivated elderly individuals who were initially reluctant to join. Through participation, they become more engaged, meet other elderly individuals, and have the opportunity to see physiotherapist and pharmacist. They don’t just seek knowledge or exercise; they also want to learn about other topics and leave with both knowledge and peace of mind. As service providers, we also feel fulfilled and happy seeing this impact. (Healthcare professional 1)

4 Discussion

The study aimed to understand delivering geriatric care of healthcare providers working in Elderly Daycare Centres to gain insight into their perspective of service caring for older people. Study findings provide a crucial new understanding of the experiences of this group of healthcare providers (e.g., registered nurses, a physiotherapist, a nutritionist, public health technical officers, and others) in healthcare services for these individuals. According to healthcare providers, the important factors to consider in the care of older people are preventive programs, the training of multidisciplinary healthcare personnel on healthcare problems specific to older persons, and facilities for older persons.

4.1 Increasing access to healthcare services and reducing inequality for the elderly

The findings of this study underscore the critical role of Person-Centered Care (PCC) in shaping the professional attitudes and practices of healthcare providers within elderly daycare centers. The data revealed how providers’ understanding and interpretation of PCC directly translate into the successful implementation of active aging programs, ultimately enhancing the well-being and autonomy of older adults (Fig 1).

Fig 1. A conceptual framework for the Elderly Daycare Centre.

Fig 1

A core finding of this research was that successful active aging programs were founded on a person-centered approach that valued the individual above all else. Healthcare providers conducted individualised assessments to design activities that were not only meaningful and engaging but also honored each person’s unique history and abilities. This approach, centered on respect and dignity, empowered older adults to actively participate in choices that enhanced their satisfaction and quality of life [19]. For instance, the collaboration among multidisciplinary teams ensured that care was tailored to individual needs; nurses kept activity coordinators informed of health changes, while a pharmacist took the time to explain medications, empowering older adults to make informed decisions about their own non-urgent care.

The implementation of PCC in these Daycare Centres was instrumental in giving older adults more control over their own lives. The goal was not merely to meet immediate health needs, but to empower them to make choices and feel a sense of purpose. Similarly, empowering older adults help to challenge ageism by highlighting the strengths, capabilities and future opportunities as well as facilitating patient-centered care [20]. It was made possible by a collaborative environment where healthcare providers recognized and built upon each person’s unique strengths. This interdisciplinary effort demonstrated how the ethical and philosophical tenets of PCC can be operationalised to create an environment where older adults are not passive recipients of care, but active participants in their own well-being [21].

Elderly Daycare Centres also enable older people at risk of falls and who had nutrition problems to access health services in terms of support facilities, program activities, and home visits from multidisciplinary healthcare professionals. The service programs meet the needs of older people and their relatives. To enhance the well-being of an aging population, it’s crucial to both make healthcare accessibility and the utilisation of healthcare services [2,22]. Healthcare providers employed strategies to reduce costs related to medications, transportation, and support services that would assist older adults in better managing the complexity associated with the risk of falls and nutrition. In other words, this supported raising access to healthcare services. This aligns with previous studies that supported the idea that primary care professionals play a significant role as medication optimisation specialists, taking responsibility for adjusting treatments, implementing de-prescribing when appropriate, and creating personalised approaches to enhance medication benefits [22,23].

Previous studies found that healthcare accessibility was compromised by multiple transportation-related factors: no private vehicle access, undependable public transportation systems, extended travel distances to providers, financial burdens of travel, and physical limitations affecting mobility [23]. Not only transportation related costs to healthcare appointments obstacles, but the inability to operate transportation options due to disability was also a transportation barrier to accessing healthcare services [23]. However, in this study, facility service in terms of transportation can support healthcare access. Similarly, healthcare accessibility for older adults was being addressed through targeted interventions: strengthening workforce capabilities, optimising facility resources, and enhancing information management practices [24]. Furthermore, enhancing access to necessary public health services for the older population was a significant challenge and an obstacle on the road [24]. Supporting older adults in overcoming disability-related barriers to healthcare access serves as a means of social inclusion, allowing them to participate physically in muscle-strengthening programs. This was one of the solutions presented in studies for dealing with the physical limitations, which was to encourage movement and to exercise safely and efficiently [22,24].

Eliminating health disparities and promoting health equity are to address interconnected public health challenges [25]. Although not all health disparities would be eliminated, policies and practices that lessen or eradicate the underlying causes of health inequities and healthcare disparities would significantly reduce them and bring the country closer to health parity. The current study is unique as it provided improving access to healthcare services in Elderly Daycare Centres, one of the strategies to encourage equal opportunities in healthcare. Considering the healthcare providers in the study, they felt that accomplishments in healthcare services could assist older adults in accessing healthcare services and reduce health disparities, boosting the older population’s overall well-being.

Interestingly, the finding was consistent with previous studies which pointed out that healthcare providers are responsible for addressing inequalities and working towards a more equitable healthcare service [25,26]. Achieving health equity includes the principle of fairness in health systems for all individuals, especially elderly adults [25,27]. For the Convention of Human Rights for Older People, the UN has recently brought attention to the unique problems facing the elderly and the need for policies that improve access to care and support, including long-term care, and fortify the healthcare and social protection systems [27]. The findings suggested that successful elderly care is not just about the programs offered, but about the deeply rooted professional attitudes and collaborative efforts of providers who view their role as empowering individuals to be active participants in their own lives.

4.2 Improving the quality of life of older adults

Quality of life plays a key moderating role between physical activity and essential factors like psychological resilience, mental health, and health behaviours [28,29]. These multiple dimensions can improve the Quality of Life and well-being [20]. Collaboration across multiple disciplines plays a crucial role in improving the quality of life for older primary care patients [8]. In this study, healthcare professionals often encouraged elderly clients to engage in structured social and cognitive activities, aligning with Activity Theory, which posits that sustained engagement contributes to improved well-being in old age. They reported that facilitating these interactions provided observable benefits to client mood and cognition, reinforcing their satisfaction.

Elderly Daycare Centres offered recovery programmes, social interaction with peers, and participation in programs, meals, and physical activities. They also supported physical and mental well-being health including the provision of purposeful activities. These can reduce social isolation among elders and provided enjoyment and a good environment in their family and home [6]. Healthcare professionals described that they encouraged older adults with the programs in terms of strengthening muscle program and nutritional health program. They could better manage their own healthcare. Such activities in Elderly Daycare centres were expected to improve the quality of life of older people. This study also found similar results that Daycare Centres in the therapies offered preserve improve the quality of life, social life, physical function, and mental health of older attendees. They also provide social interaction, activities, and therapies that enhance life quality, assist in managing pre-existing diseases, and may stop deteriorating health and function [28].

Getting out of home was also a chance to socialise and enjoyment with a community-based group [6]. Social participation promoted well-being and reduced isolation and loneliness [30]. Healthcare providers in the study offered supporting ageing in place through well-being and education. Therefore, seniors’ ability to health life’s difficulties affects their overall, demonstrating how quality of life links physical activity to improves psychological wellness. Previous studies on primary care providers had recognised the engagement in physical activity yields significant positive outcomes across multiple dimensions of health and well-being, mental well-being, and psychological resilience [2931]. Encouraging physical and psychological well-being as well as social activities can also improve their quality of life and health.

The association between physical health, psychological well-being, and social connection also reveals the quality-of-life benefits of older adults in Daycare Centres [32,33]. Daycare service centres that incorporate structured physical activity protocols demonstrate statistically significant, albeit moderate, enhancements in participants’ functional capabilities, postural stability, and capacity to perform essential self-care tasks. These improvements correlate with quantifiable reductions in frailty indices and fall probability metrics, suggesting a protective effect against age-related functional decline [33]. This substantial reduction in psychological distress indicators suggested that structured engagement in community-based day programs may function as an effective non-pharmacological intervention for geriatric mental health management [34]. Subsequently, Orellana [35] revealed statistically significant enhancements in participants’ perception of available social resources and interpersonal relationship quality. The findings suggest that the structured social engagement opportunities inherent in day centre environments contribute substantially to rebuilding and maintaining essential social networks that frequently diminish during advanced ageing. Similarly, Albarqi [8] recommended that healthcare systems should focus on establishing collaborative care models, encouraging interdisciplinary cooperation and implementing strategies that enhance social connections for the ageing population.

4.3 Challenging and rewards in healthcare services for older adults

The results showed that the provision of knowledge support and training for assessing the elderly was a significant factor. This finding directly supported OST, which suggested that an organisation’s resources can either enable or constrain healthcare providers’ ability to implement specific approaches. Likewise, the training provided empowering the healthcare providers to apply their knowledge and skills, thereby facilitating the implementation of activity-based and person-centered care [36,37].

Furthermore, the support for developing specialised programs, such as exercise programs for improving muscle strength, highlights how organizational backing promotes providers’ expertise and autonomy. This was consistent with OST’s view that a supportive environment encouraged providers to take ownership of their roles, leading to increased job satisfaction and a more collaborative work environment [13]. This sense of being supported by the organisation—getting the tools and training they needed—directly resulted in a number of positive outcomes. Healthcare providers were more satisfied with their works and better equipped to handle the daily stresses of working in elderly daycare centers. This confirmed that when healthcare providers felt supported, they became more committed and were better able to handle the challenges of their work, an opinion that OST had consistently expressed (Fig 1).

Essentially, this study provided empirical evidence for the application of Organizational Support Theory (OST) within the specific context of elderly daycare centers. The findings underscored the crucial role of organisational support—in the form of training, resources, and autonomy—in achieving positive geriatric care outcomes. By empowering healthcare providers with the necessary tools and knowledge, organisations can not only improve providers’ work satisfaction and commitment but also enhanced the quality of person-centered care for the elderly [38].

Complexly raising the growth of elderly patients and the requirements of caring frequently provide challenges for healthcare personnel [39]. Healthcare providers in this study described feelings of emotional challenging and rewards due to the demanding nature of providing continuous cognitive stimulation, personal care, and emotional support to older people. Simultaneously, many derived a deep sense of purpose and connection from their roles. Multi dimensions of improvements of Quality of Life and well-being fulfil a critical respite function that generates demonstrable positive outcomes for family caregivers, creating a complementary effect where both care recipients and their informal support networks experience meaningful advantages from participation [28]. This bidirectional benefit pattern suggested that day services effectively address the interconnected needs of older adults and those who provided daily care, representing a particularly efficient intervention within the continuum of community-based elder services. [34]. Inadequate competency and lack of integration and coordination of services were concerned in home care services for older adults [40]. Mobasseri et al. [40] recommended that improvements in healthcare for older persons were fostering partnerships among key stakeholders to strengthen healthcare delivery for older people. Providing additional training to long-term health providers or staff, raising the health awareness of older people, and teaching life skills were several important aspects of caring for older people [41]. Effective collaboration among healthcare providers and older adults’ interactions created favourable conditions for meaningful. It was essential to note that healthcare providers’ reflections on experiences providing care following programs encompassed encouraging recovery and rehabilitation for older people who participated in all programs.

Healthcare providers consistently highlighted the value of having supportive leadership and well-defined role expectations. Drawing on Organisational Support Theory (OST), the perception of managerial support played a crucial role in fostering their resilience and dedication to providing care [42]. Feelings of being appreciated and included in decision-making processes were closely linked to increased motivation and a greater likelihood of staff performance [43]. In the context of Elderly Daycare Centres, OST can profoundly influence healthcare providers’ job satisfaction, commitment, and their capacity to cope with the demands of their roles. The goal of professional training programs was to combine theory and practice. These included improving abilities in role fulfilment, personal-centered relationships, and elder care. Prior research indicated that trainees’ self-thinking and adaptability during the training process should be enhanced, and the practicality of theoretical knowledge should be highlighted [9,40]. Enhancing interdisciplinary healthcare practitioners’ professional expertise and abilities will also increase their incentive to engage in the chances, challenges, and initiatives [39,40]. To improve the professional skills of interdisciplinary healthcare practitioners, it would also be beneficial to offer evidence-based training by fusing literature with experience.

Activity Theory illuminates how multidisciplinary healthcare providers facilitate meaningful engagement through diverse programming, social interaction opportunities, and therapeutic interventions [12] (Fig 1). The theory suggested that healthcare providers play a crucial role as facilitators of activity, helping older adults navigate age-related changes while maintaining their sense of purpose and social connection. In this sense, this study uniquely uncovered healthcare providers who were experienced in healthcare services for older adults. They identified two main rewards: realising improvement in older adults’ health, functional abilities, and quality of life. Previous literature in focused on caring for older people supported and reported finding satisfaction in improvements in the health and quality of life of their elderly participants and feeling valued through the appreciation expressed by these older adults [9]. The rewards in caring for older people with multiple chronic conditions in a study by Ploeg et al. [23] were a strong sense of duty or responsibility toward addressing their participants’ needs. However, their study pointed out that they frequently faced significant burdens or strains due to providing this care.

The findings in the study were also consistent with challenges reported in other literature, which extended the rewards by experiences across a wider variety of community-based providers who care for older adults with multiple conditions through developing and improving their professional skills and knowledge and building meaningful relationships with both their patients and fellow healthcare providers. Healthcare providers with extensive experience in geriatric services participated in this study and had the same experiences with others. This presented taking on the challenge of complex care needs when working with older adults who have multiple chronic conditions [23].

Complex caring for patients need access to ongoing inter-professional education and training in various modalities, such as inter-professional lectures and workplace training sessions that integrated several healthcare disciplines [39,43]. The study also combined with the perspective of multidisciplinary healthcare teams about the value of implementing successful both programs for older people in Elderly Daycare Centres. In other words, that was the understanding of challenges and rewards experiences by healthcare providers for older adults and strengthening multidisciplinary healthcare team works. Furthermore, a comprehensive approach combining individual and organizational strategies was essential, recognizing that effective collaborative practice environments emerged from the joint contributions of healthcare professionals, care organizations, and health system structures working together [44].

5 Conclusion

Healthcare professionals working in the Elderly Daycare Centres navigated complex emotional, cognitive, and organizational challenges daily. Understanding their lived experiences offered valuable insight into how care-giving dynamics intersect with theoretical models of ageing, coping, and organizational behaviour.

Elderly Daycare Centres were designed to support older adults who experienced various challenges, such as individuals at risk of falls and those with nutritional issues. They also need essential nursing services or health monitoring during the day. These centres provided a structured environment where seniors can engage in social and recreational activities, receive necessary health services, and maintain a sense of independence, thereby enhancing their overall quality of life. Healthcare providers were employing various effective strategies to assist older adults in managing their health. These approaches included implementing person-centered care, collaborating with other providers, and addressing social determinants of health. The present study’s findings suggested that the Elderly Daycare Centres were essential for creating a sense of context and belongingness amongst older people. Healthcare providers identified the necessity for a more comprehensive and integrated care system to enhance service delivery and outcomes for older people.

Healthcare providers in this study operated at the critical intersection where population needs, system capacities, and policy expectations converge in daily practice, experiencing policy requirements not as abstract mandates but as practice realities that directly shaped their clinical decision-making and inter-professional relationships. The findings revealed that healthcare providers did not experience these elements as separate contextual factors but rather as an integrated reality requiring holistic responses that bridged the gap between policy intention and clinical implementation.

6 Implications for practice and policy

Understanding healthcare professionals’ experiences through the lens of ageing and organizational theory highlights the need for training programs that address both client-centered care and caregiver well-being. Future research should explore how institutional policies can better support adaptive coping strategies in high-demand care environments and could examine the differences between providers by profession, and by geographic setting. Selection bias may have been introduced through recruitment through authors’ personal networks.

7 Limitation

The cultural context of the healthcare settings examined may not reflect the diversity of cultural approaches to healthcare delivery found in other regions or populations.

Regional factors, including healthcare infrastructure, resource availability, and local health policies, create specific operational environments that may limit the generalizability of findings to different geographic contexts.

The organisational characteristics of the institutions involved—including their size, structure, and institutional culture—represent particular healthcare delivery models that may not be representative of the broader healthcare landscape. These contextual factors collectively suggest that provider experiences are deeply embedded within their specific practice environments, and findings should be interpreted with consideration of these cultural, regional, and organizational boundaries

Supporting information

S1 Fig. A conceptual framework for Elderly Daycare Centre. Fig 1 in S1 Fig.

(PDF)

pone.0331453.s001.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)
S1 Table. Demographic details of Participants. Table 1 in S1 Table.

(TIF)

pone.0331453.s002.tif (53.3KB, tif)

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank all the participants in this study who were kind and open enough to share their experiences with us. We would also like to thank all the associations who helped recruit the participants and facilitated the collection of the data for this study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

Thai Health Promotion Foundation (ThaiHealth) (Grant number 65-00-0192). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. 2024. Accessed 2025 February 5.
  • 2.Jones CH, Dolsten M. Healthcare on the brink: navigating the challenges of an aging society in the United States. NPJ Aging. 2024;10(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41514-024-00148-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.The Nations. New challenges emerge as Thailand’s population continues. https://www.nationthailand.com/thailand/general/40031071. 2023. Accessed 2025 February 15.
  • 4.Department of Older Persons M of SD and HS. The act on the elderly b.e. 2546 (2003 a.d.). 2003. https://www.dop.go.th/download/laws/regulation_th_20160807155130_1.pdf
  • 5.Foundation of Thai Gerontology Research and Development Institute (TGRI). Situation of the thai older persons 2021. 2021. https://www.dop.go.th/download/knowledge/th1663828576-17471.pdf
  • 6.Baranwal A, Mishra S. Understanding the importance of day care centres for elderly in Mumbai. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. 2021;11(4):15–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hannawa AF, Wu AW, Kolyada A, Potemkina A, Donaldson LJ. The aspects of healthcare quality that are important to health professionals and patients: a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(6):1561–70. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Albarqi MN. Assessing the Impact of Multidisciplinary Collaboration on Quality of Life in Older Patients Receiving Primary Care: Cross Sectional Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(13):1258. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liao L, Feng M, You Y, Chen Y, Guan C, Liu Y. Experiences of older people, healthcare providers and caregivers on implementing person-centered care for community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03915-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McCormack B. Person-centredness in gerontological nursing: an overview of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2004;13:31–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McCormack B, McCance T. Person-centred practice in nursing and health care: theory and practice. Sussex: Wiley. 2016.
  • 12.Havighurst RJ. Successful aging. The Gerontologist. 1961. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1986;71(3):500. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.World Health Organization. Healthy ageing and functional ability. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/healthy-ageing-and-functional-ability. 2020. Accessed 2025 February 15.
  • 15.World Health Organization. Constitution of the world health organization. https://apps.who.int/gb/bd/PDF/bd47/EN/constitution-en.pdf?ua=1. 1948. Accessed 2025 February 5.
  • 16.Montero-Odasso M, van der Velde N, Martin FC, Petrovic M, Tan MP, Ryg J, et al. World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative. Age Ageing. 2022;51(9):afac205. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.van Manen M. From meaning to method. Qualitative Health Research. 1997;7(3):345–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smith JA, Larkin M, Flowers P. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. 2 ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.. 2021.
  • 19.Sunzi K, Luo H, Yin L, Li Y, Zhou X, Lei C. Exploring perceptions of dignity among older adults living in nursing homes: a qualitative study. Front Psychiatry. 2025;16:1616114. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1616114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Noordink T, Verharen L, Schalk R, Van Regenmortel T. A Conceptual Exploration of Psychological Empowerment with Older People. A Tailored Concept Mapping Approach. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2024;67(8):1153–73. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2024.2359927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nilsen ER, Hollister B, Söderhamn U, Dale B. What matters to older adults? Exploring person-centred care during and after transitions between hospital and home. J Clin Nurs. 2022;31(5–6):569–81. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Haroun JA, Sneed KB, Pathak Y. Optimizing medication and patient health through deprescribing practices. Nur Primary Care. 2023;7(6):1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ploeg J, Yous M-L, Fraser K, Dufour S, Baird LG, Kaasalainen S, et al. Healthcare providers’ experiences in supporting community-living older adults to manage multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1345-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hajizadeh A, Babaei A, Babaei G, Tajvar M, Heydari M. Strategies to enhance access and utilization of health services by older population: a comprehensive scoping review. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2024;2024(1):3645115. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gómez CA, Kleinman DV, Pronk N, Wrenn Gordon GL, Ochiai E, Blakey C, et al. Addressing Health Equity and Social Determinants of Health Through Healthy People 2030 . J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(Suppl 6):S249–57. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Prentice KR, Beitelshees M, Hill A, Jones C. Defining health equity: a modern us perspective. iScience. 2024;27(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Carroll C, Sworn K, Booth A, Tsuchiya A, Maden M, Rosenberg M. Equity in healthcare access and service coverage for older people: a scoping review of the conceptual literature. Integrated Healthcare Journal. 2022;4(1):e000092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Olsen JA, Misajon R. A conceptual map of health-related quality of life dimensions: key lessons for a new instrument. Qual Life Res. 2020;29(3):733–43. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02341-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu R, Menhas R, Saqib ZA. Does physical activity influence health behavior, mental health, and psychological resilience under the moderating role of quality of life?. Front Psychol. 2024;15:1349880. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Saqib ZA, Dai J, Menhas R, Mahmood S, Karim M, Sang X, et al. Physical activity is a medicine for non-communicable diseases: a survey study regarding the perception of physical activity impact on health wellbeing. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020;13:2949–62. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S280339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zheng W, Huang Y, Fu Y. Mediating effects of psychological resilience on life satisfaction among older adults: a cross-sectional study in China. Health Soc Care Community. 2020;28(4):1323–32. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sridevi CM. Elderly health and mental well-being: examining the relationship between physical and psychological care. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia. 2025;54(4):5190–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lunt C, Dowrick C, Lloyd-Williams M. The role of day care in supporting older people living with long-term conditions. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018;12(4):510–5. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Giebel C, Shrestha N, Reilly S, White RG, Zuluaga MI, Saldarriaga G, et al. Community-based mental health and well-being interventions for older adults in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03453-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Orellana K, Manthorpe J, Tinker A. Day centres for older people: a systematically conducted scoping review of literature about their benefits, purposes and how they are perceived. Ageing Soc. 2020;40(1):73–104. doi: 10.1017/s0144686x18000843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kwame A, Petrucka PM. A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Heggdal K, Mendelsohn JB, Stepanian N, Oftedal BF, Larsen MH. Health-care professionals’ assessment of a person-centred intervention to empower self-management and health across chronic illness: qualitative findings from a process evaluation study. Health Expect. 2021;24(4):1367–77. doi: 10.1111/hex.13271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hoxha G, Simeli I, Theocharis D, Vasileiou A, Tsekouropoulos G. Sustainable healthcare quality and job satisfaction through organizational culture: approaches and outcomes. Sustainability. 2024;16(9):3603. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Geese F, Schmitt K-U. Interprofessional collaboration in complex patient care transition: a qualitative multi-perspective analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(3):359. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mobasseri K, Allahverdipour H, Matlabi H, Kousha A. Experiences regarding home care for older adults from the viewpoint of family, paid caregivers, nurses, and experts: a qualitative study. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2024;2024(1):4591881. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nayeri ND, Abazari F, Pouraboli B. Challenges in caring for the elderly in Iran: a systematic review. Ethiopian Medical Journal. 2018;56(2). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Roy I, Islam R, Arefin MS, Rahman S. How perceived supervisor and organizational support shape job satisfaction: the intervening role of work-life balance and organizational identification. Open Journal of Business and Management. 2025;13(4):2782–809. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shakhman LM, Al Omari O, Arulappan J, Wynaden D. Interprofessional education and collaboration: strategies for implementation. Oman Med J. 2020;35(4):e160. doi: 10.5001/omj.2020.83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rosen MA, DiazGranados D, Dietz AS, Benishek LE, Thompson D, Pronovost PJ, et al. Teamwork in healthcare: key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care. Am Psychol. 2018;73(4):433–50. doi: 10.1037/amp0000298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Le An Pham

29 Apr 2025

PONE-D-25-14917Perspectives of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Providers in Elderly Daycare Centres: Challenges, Opportunities and Impacts on Geriatric Care in Chiangrai Municipality, ThailandPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Leekuan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 13 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Le An Pham, Ph.D.,M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed).

3. Please remove all personal information, ensure that the data shared are in accordance with participant consent, and re-upload a fully anonymized data set.

Note: spreadsheet columns with personal information must be removed and not hidden as all hidden columns will appear in the published file.

Additional guidance on preparing raw data for publication can be found in our Data Policy (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-human-research-participant-data-and-other-sensitive-data) and in the following article: http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long.

4. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 1 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

5. We notice that your supplementary [tables] are included in the manuscript file. Please remove them and upload them with the file type 'Supporting Information'. Please ensure that each Supporting Information file has a legend listed in the manuscript after the references list.

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Additional Editor Comments :

Overall Evaluation:

This paper addresses an important and under explored topic in geriatric care by investigating the perspectives of multidisciplinary healthcare providers in elderly daycare centers in Chiangrai Municipality, Thailand. The qualitative design is appropriate, and the findings are clearly structured and well-presented. However, some improvements are necessary to enhance the clarity, rigor, and balance of the manuscript.

Strengths:

The introduction establishes a strong rationale, clearly situating the research within the context of global and national aging trends.

The use of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) and thematic analysis adds depth to the exploration of participant experiences.

The results are rich, supported by participant quotations, and linked meaningfully to existing literature.

Practical implications are thoughtfully drawn, providing valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners.

Areas for Improvement:

Introduction:

The background review, while comprehensive, could be more concise. I suggest focusing more sharply on the identified research gap concerning healthcare provider experiences.

Methods:

Please clarify whether a back-translation procedure was used to validate translated interview data.

Additionally, it would strengthen the methodology to more explicitly acknowledge the limitations of the small sample size and single setting concerning the generalizability of findings.

Results:

Some thematic sections present slightly repetitive participant quotations. I recommend summarizing overlapping responses more succinctly.

Furthermore, the results would benefit from including a wider range of participant views, particularly any divergent or negative experiences, to present a balanced perspective.

Discussion:

While well-integrated with the existing literature, the discussion occasionally overgeneralizes findings. Please ensure interpretations remain grounded within the scope of the study.

I strongly recommend adding a Limitations subsection to candidly discuss sample size, selection bias, setting specificity, and potential translation issues.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for the opportunity to review the manuscript “Perspectives of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Providers in Elderly Daycare Centres: Challenges, Opportunities and Impacts on Geriatric Care in Chiangrai Municipality, Thailand”. The manuscript explores the lived experiences of healthcare providers delivering care within community-based elderly daycare settings. The authors aim to identify key challenges healthcare professionals face, successful practices utilized, and potential opportunities for enhancing geriatric care services through qualitative inquiry. The study used a phenomenological approach to gather data from twelve multidisciplinary providers, including registered nurses, physiotherapists, nutritionists, and public health technical officers, through semi-structured interviews. Data analysis involved thematic and interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), revealing four central themes: opportunities in policy implementation, challenging experiences, enhancement of organizational effectiveness, and reflections on program outcomes and impacts. The manuscript highlights essential insights into how multidisciplinary teams perceive and experience geriatric care services, underscoring the significance of integrated, community-oriented care models for older adults. However, numerous critical areas must be addressed to strengthen the manuscript's academic rigor, theoretical coherence, and methodological clarity, as below:

1. The theoretical perspectives are vaguely described and analyzed:

� The manuscript does not explicitly articulate a guiding theoretical approach, essential in phenomenological research. As a qualitative methodology, phenomenology seeks to deeply explore individuals' lived experiences to uncover the meanings and essences of phenomena as perceived by the participants. However, the manuscript does not specify whether the phenomenological approach employed aligns with Husserl's descriptive phenomenology, focusing on bracketing researchers' assumptions to reveal the pure essence of experiences, or Heidegger's interpretative phenomenology (hermeneutic phenomenology), which emphasizes the researchers' interpretative engagement with the data and recognizes their preconceived notions as integral to interpretation. The authors are, therefore, encouraged to articulate the theoretical perspectives underpinning their phenomenological research explicitly and then clarify how phenomenology directly shapes data collection procedures, the process of conceptualization, and subsequent interpretation of findings.

� In data gathering, specifying the chosen phenomenological approach would better guide and justify the construction of interview questions, the conduct of interviews, and the researchers’ role within these interactions. The authors might benefit from explicitly describing how they managed their assumptions during interviews (through bracketing or interpretive engagement) to enhance transparency and methodological rigor.

� Regarding conceptualization, it is recommended that the authors clearly describe the process used to identify and categorize meaningful statements and themes. A detailed explanation of whether descriptive or interpretative phenomenological principles guided this would strengthen the credibility and clarity of theme development.

� When interpreting findings, it is advisable to explicitly acknowledge the hermeneutic process, particularly if adopting Heidegger’s interpretative phenomenology. Describing the iterative process of interpretation—the "hermeneutic circle"—would substantially enhance the depth and transparency of the findings. Clearly defining the theoretical approach will significantly improve the manuscript’s theoretical coherence, methodological rigor, and interpretive clarity.

2. The semi-structured interviews are suitable for qualitative phenomenological research, yet the development and validation of the interview guide lack sufficient detail. The authors should clearly describe the process of constructing, piloting, and refining the interview guide, thereby enhancing methodological transparency and ensuring content validity

3. The data analysis approach combining thematic and interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) is appropriate; however, the manuscript lacks sufficient procedural details that assure methodological rigor. Detailed accounts of specific practices such as member-checking, peer debriefing, reflexivity strategies, and inter-rater reliability would considerably improve analytical robustness. A clear reflexivity statement addressing the researchers' positionality and potential biases would ensure transparency and enhance credibility.

4. According to the findings, while the identified themes are relevant and informative, they could benefit from deeper theoretical interpretation. The manuscript presents themes descriptively but misses the opportunity to explicitly connect with existing aging theories, stress-coping mechanisms, or organizational behavior theories. Such theoretical integration would enrich the interpretation and increase the manuscript's scholarly value.

5. The implications for practice and policy are implicitly stated but require more precise articulation. The manuscript would benefit significantly from explicitly outlining actionable policy recommendations and practical interventions derived from the findings. Additionally, discussing the potential scalability of identified successful practices across broader contexts would add practical relevance.

6. A comprehensive discussion of limitations, particularly regarding the transferability of findings, would strengthen the manuscript. Explicitly addressing contextual limitations (cultural, regional, and organizational) and suggesting pathways for future research would enhance methodological rigor and academic value.

7. The Introduction section of the manuscript provides comprehensive context and thorough background information on elderly care and daycare centers. However, it is overly detailed and somewhat repetitive, diluting the reader's focus on the study's objectives and significance. I recommend condensing this section by succinctly synthesizing relevant demographic data and policy contexts. Clarify and streamline the narrative by integrating similar ideas, particularly regarding the aging population's implications, healthcare system pressures, and policy frameworks. This conciseness will enhance readability and emphasize the core rationale and objectives of the study.

8. The authors have provided detailed quotes from participants that significantly enrich the manuscript by illustrating the lived experiences of multidisciplinary healthcare providers in elderly daycare centres. However, the presentation of quotes could be optimized for clarity and effectiveness. Specifically, it is recommended that the authors critically evaluate and selectively present quotes to ensure they succinctly reflect key themes and avoid redundancy. The manuscript would benefit from more strategically integrated quotes, emphasizing those that most strongly illustrate the core findings or unique insights relevant to the research objectives. Overly lengthy quotes could be condensed to maintain reader engagement and highlight only the most pertinent data points. The authors will enhance their qualitative findings' overall readability and impact by carefully curating and refining the quoted content.

In conclusion, the manuscript offers meaningful contributions to understanding multidisciplinary geriatric care experiences but requires improvements in theoretical clarity, methodological rigor, and interpretive depth. Addressing these points with MAJOR REVISION would significantly enhance its suitability for publication in PLOS ONE.

Reviewer #2: Paralee and colleagues reported that key aspects of challenges multidisciplinary healthcare providers face and opportunities for enhancement in healthcare delivery systems of the aging population. The method is sound, and the manuscript is clear and well written. I have a few minor comments:

- Please consider providing exclusion criteria when inviting participants through purposive sampling.

- Since your study includes only one physiotherapist and one nutritionist, could coding by profession reveal the identity of the participants? You should consider this carefully.

- I see the title "Pharmacist," in line 378 but it is not described in Demographic details of participants. Is there an error here?

- The description of activities within the care model at the study centers is insufficiently detailed. Could the author provide a rationale for the purposive sampling method employed, specifically addressing the exclusion of physicians?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-25-14917_reviewer comments.docx

pone.0331453.s003.docx (18.8KB, docx)
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 19;20(9):e0331453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331453.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


21 Jun 2025

All responses were added in Response to reviewers file attached.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0331453.s004.docx (47.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Le An Pham

30 Jun 2025

PONE-D-25-14917R1Perspectives of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Providers in Elderly Daycare Centres: Challenges, Opportunities and Impacts on Geriatric Care in Chiangrai Municipality, ThailandPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Leekuan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 14 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Le An Pham, Ph.D.,M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Clarify Method Blending: Distinguish IPA from Thematic Analysis or Justify Hybrid Please to confirm in method section

Clarified Theoretical Positioning (Suggested Section: Introduction & Discussion) such as integrated Activity Theory, Person-Centered Care PCC, and Organizational Support Theory OST

ForEx Activity Theory, which posits that active participation in meaningful, socially engaging activities enhances psychological well-being and life satisfaction in older adults. Additionally, Person-Centered Care (PCC) principles guide the analysis by framing care as relational, individualized, and respectful of autonomy. These frameworks are particularly relevant in the context of Elderly Daycare Centres, where physical, emotional, and social care intersect. The lens of Organizational Support Theory (OST) is also applied to interpret how institutional structures shape staff motivation and collaborative effectiveness.

Synthesized participant narratives into conceptual insights in analysis such as Healthcare providers interpreted government mandates not as abstract directives but as dynamic frameworks that guide clinical practice. Weekly planning and debriefing meetings created a cyclical feedback loop, enhancing implementation fidelity. Providers saw themselves as "conduits of policy," translating structural goals into person-centered routines. This aligns with Organizational Support Theory, as structured reflection improved morale and perceived relevance of their work.

Enhance Visual Representation: Include Conceptual Framework or Model

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 19;20(9):e0331453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331453.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 2


14 Aug 2025

1.All references are rechecked in order to complete and correct.

• Reference no. 3 is revised.

• Reference no. 13 is revised

2.This study employed Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) as its qualitative methodology in order to explore the lived experiences and meaning-making processes of participant group in depth. Unlike more general approaches to thematic analysis which identify overarching themes across a dataset.

3. Added Theoretical theory: Integrated Activity Theory, Person-Centered Care (PCC) and Organizational Support Theory (OST) in Introduction section

4.Added Theoretical theory: Integrated Activity Theory, Person-Centered Care (PCC) and Organizational Support Theory (OST) in Discussion section

5.Added the organizational structure facilitated robust interprofessional collaboration, which, in turn, boosted motivation

6.Added information about Healthcare providers viewed government commands as adaptable frameworks that informed their daily clinical practice, not as inflexible, theoretical regulations.

7. Added Structured Weekly meetings to support adaptive care delivery

8. Added the core tenets of OST, which support organization values and cares

9. Included Conceptual Framework for Elderly Daycare Centre

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers II.pdf

pone.0331453.s005.pdf (169.6KB, pdf)

Decision Letter 2

Le An Pham

17 Aug 2025

Perspectives of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Providers in Elderly Daycare Centres: Challenges, Opportunities and Impacts on Geriatric Care in Chiangrai Municipality, Thailand

PONE-D-25-14917R2

Dear Dr. Leekuan,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Le An Pham, Ph.D.,M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Le An Pham

PONE-D-25-14917R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Leekuan,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Le An Pham

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. A conceptual framework for Elderly Daycare Centre. Fig 1 in S1 Fig.

    (PDF)

    pone.0331453.s001.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)
    S1 Table. Demographic details of Participants. Table 1 in S1 Table.

    (TIF)

    pone.0331453.s002.tif (53.3KB, tif)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-25-14917_reviewer comments.docx

    pone.0331453.s003.docx (18.8KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0331453.s004.docx (47.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers II.pdf

    pone.0331453.s005.pdf (169.6KB, pdf)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES