Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 18;113(4):1533–1545. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01079-4

Table 2.

Intergroup comparisons and descriptive statistics for the fracture resistance (N)

Group Mean 95% Confidence interval SD Min Max
Lower Upper
Lithium disilicate inlay 873.69BC 800.51 946.86 105.60 738.43 1018.47
Composite inlay 771.38C 713.37 829.39 83.71 643.88 839.08
Lithium disilicate overlay 1101.83A 1047.35 1156.32 78.63 991.41 1194.52
Composite overlay 973.53B 898.62 1048.44 108.10 801.98 1068.55
Negative control 391.70D 362.02 421.37 42.82 329.84 448.55
Positive control 1126.89A 1080.61 1173.18 66.79 1064.66 1211.66

Different superscript letters indicate a statistically significant difference within the same vertical column and horizontal row