Table 2.
A summary of the studies compared to the present study.
| Study | Acc. | Recall | F1 (Weig.) | F1 (Macro) | Prec. | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spike2Vec | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.79 | Ali and Patterson (2021) |
| Kernel Approximation | 0.998 | 0.997 | 0.998 | 0.998 | 0.997 | Ali et al. (2021) |
| PWM2Vec | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.84 | Ali et al. (2022) |
| Neural Network | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.49 | 0.78 | Ali et al. (2023) |
| This work (CNN + BiLSTM) | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 0.99 ± 0.00 | This work |
Only the best values for all used ML algorithms/Classifiers were compared. The results for PWM2Vec reported in this table involved ridge regression as the feature selection approach.