Table 2.

Differences in delay discounting

Model	Effect	β	s.e.	P uncorrected	P corrected
Delay discounting money	Group (AUD versus healthy controls)	0.134	0.122	0.271	0.325
	Group (BN versus healthy controls)	0.137	0.135	0.311	0.574
Delay discounting alcohol before MIST	Group (AUD versus HCalcohol)	−0.357	0.191	0.068	0.136
Delay discounting alcohol after MIST	Group (AUD versus HCalcohol)	−0.253	0.184	0.174	0.260
Delay discounting alcohol after versus before MIST	Group (AUD)	0.073	0.019	<0.001b	0.002b
	Group (HCalcohol)	0.006	0.019	0.761	0.761
Delay discounting food before MIST	Group (BN versus HCfood)	−0.061	0.121	0.613	0.613
Delay discounting food after MIST	Group (BN versus HCfood)	−0.098	0.132	0.416	0.574
Delay discounting food after versus before MIST	Group (BN)	0.020	0.028	0.478	0.574
	Group (HCfood)	0.060	0.028	0.039a	0.233

AUD, alcohol use disorder; β, estimate; BN, bulimia nervosa; HC, healthy control; HC_alcohol, healthy controls who performed the alcohol delay discounting task; HC_food, healthy controls who performed the food delay discounting task; MIST, Montreal Imaging Stress Task; P _uncorrected, uncorrected P-value; P _corrected, corrected P-value using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure.

^aNominally significant result.

^bSignificant result.