Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 6;40(9):1764–1774. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaf048

Table 3:

Baseline characteristics of tolvaptan users and the 1:1 matched cohort.

Tolvaptan, n = 92 No tolvaptan, n = 92 P-value
Age, years 43 ± 8 43 ± 11 .5
Sex (female), n (%) 39 (42.4) 51 (55.4) .1
Weight, kg 85.3 ± 13.6 80.6 ± 18.4 .048
Height, m 1.79 ± 0.10 1.77 ± 0.09 .1
BMI, kg/m2 27 ± 4 26 ± 5 .2
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 131 ± 14 130 ± 11 .5
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 87 ± 34 82 ± 9 .2
RAAS blockade use, n (%) 72 (78.3) 61 (66.3) .1
Diuretics use, n (%) 22 (23.9) 16 (17.4) .4
Height-adjusted TKV, mL/m 1071 (742–1495) 821 (526–1317) .03
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 61 ± 25 65 ± 27 .3
Mayo risk classification, n (%) .1
 1A 1 (1.1) 2 (2.2)
 1B 9 (9.8) 21 (22.8)
 1C 29 (31.5) 31 (33.7)
 1D 32 (34.8) 22 (23.9)
 1E 21 (22.8) 16 (17.4)
 Atypical
DNA mutation, n (%) .002
PKD1 truncating 39 (42.4) 42 (46.7)
PKD1 non-truncating 16 (17.4) 24 (26.1)
PKD2 6 (6.5) 15 (16.3)
 Other mutation
 No mutation detected 3 (3.3) 3 (3.3)
 Mutation unknown 28 (30.4) 8 (8.7)
Urine osmolality, mOsm/kg 359 ± 169 429 ± 168 .02
Osmolar intake, mOsm/24 h 864 ± 320 888 ± 243 .6
Tolvaptan use duration, years 6.2 ± 4.8

Time of baseline characteristics were based on the eGFR measurement closest to the start of (theoretical) treatment. The table shows mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range) or number (%).

BMI, body mass index.