Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 12;5(1):e210. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.10091

Table 3.

Overview of principal challenges to CDSS in AMS

A. Obstacles in assessing the efficacy of CDSS
Category Challenge Impact Suggested solutions
Study design 8,17,29 Heterogeneous CDSS types and outcomes Limits data pooling, weakens conclusions Define core outcome sets; typologize CDSS
Methodological quality 29,30 Reliance on before-after studies High bias, overestimates effect Use cluster-RCTs or ITS with control; follow EPOC
Clinical outcome gaps 23,25 Few studies on mortality, AMR, costs Weak insight on safety and long-term impact Include clinical, economic, microbiological outcomes
Validation gaps 42,44 Mostly retrospective, single-site ML-CDSS Poor generalizability, low trust Require prospective, multi-center validation
Evaluation frameworks 31,36 Inconsistent methods/reporting Poor comparability Adopt CONSORT-EHEALTH, DOOR, RADAR, TIDieR

ML: machine learning; AI: artificial intelligence.