Table 3.
Overview of principal challenges to CDSS in AMS
| A. Obstacles in assessing the efficacy of CDSS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Challenge | Impact | Suggested solutions |
| Study design 8,17,29 | Heterogeneous CDSS types and outcomes | Limits data pooling, weakens conclusions | Define core outcome sets; typologize CDSS |
| Methodological quality 29,30 | Reliance on before-after studies | High bias, overestimates effect | Use cluster-RCTs or ITS with control; follow EPOC |
| Clinical outcome gaps 23,25 | Few studies on mortality, AMR, costs | Weak insight on safety and long-term impact | Include clinical, economic, microbiological outcomes |
| Validation gaps 42,44 | Mostly retrospective, single-site ML-CDSS | Poor generalizability, low trust | Require prospective, multi-center validation |
| Evaluation frameworks 31,36 | Inconsistent methods/reporting | Poor comparability | Adopt CONSORT-EHEALTH, DOOR, RADAR, TIDieR |
ML: machine learning; AI: artificial intelligence.