Skip to main content
. 2025 Jun 24;11:e2921. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2921

Table 5. Quality assessment criteria.

No. Quality assessment questions Criteria scores
QAC1 Were the research purposes of the study clear? “Yes” = 1/“No” = 0
QAC2 Was the structure of the HGR model shown? “Yes” = 1, “Partly” = 0.5, and “No” = 0.
QAC3 Was the results of experiments shown? “Yes” = 1, “Partly” = 0.5, and “No” = 0.
QAC4 Were the contributions of the study clear? “Yes” = 1, “Partly” = 0.5, and “No” = 0.
QAC5 Did the article mention the future works? “Yes” = 1/“No” = 0
QAC6 Was the limitation explicitly mentioned? “Yes” = 1/“No” = 0
QAC7 Was the article published in an accreditation source? Rank by IF/JCR Q1 = 2 or CVPR, ICCV, ECCV = 2, Rank by IF/JCR Q2 = 1.5, Rank by IF/JCR Q3 or Q4 = 1, no ranking = 0

Note:

*QAC, Quality Assessment Criteria.