Table 5. Quality assessment criteria.
| No. | Quality assessment questions | Criteria scores |
|---|---|---|
| QAC1 | Were the research purposes of the study clear? | “Yes” = 1/“No” = 0 |
| QAC2 | Was the structure of the HGR model shown? | “Yes” = 1, “Partly” = 0.5, and “No” = 0. |
| QAC3 | Was the results of experiments shown? | “Yes” = 1, “Partly” = 0.5, and “No” = 0. |
| QAC4 | Were the contributions of the study clear? | “Yes” = 1, “Partly” = 0.5, and “No” = 0. |
| QAC5 | Did the article mention the future works? | “Yes” = 1/“No” = 0 |
| QAC6 | Was the limitation explicitly mentioned? | “Yes” = 1/“No” = 0 |
| QAC7 | Was the article published in an accreditation source? | Rank by IF/JCR Q1 = 2 or CVPR, ICCV, ECCV = 2, Rank by IF/JCR Q2 = 1.5, Rank by IF/JCR Q3 or Q4 = 1, no ranking = 0 |
Note:
*QAC, Quality Assessment Criteria.