Table 2. Comparison table for finding of the proposed method.

S. No	Aspects	Methods	FB-ITS	Ratio (%)
1	Learning efficiency	Lower efficiency; focuses on memorization and text analysis.	Improvement; tasks completed faster.	98.86%
2	Assessment accuracy	Limited by rigid numerical scores; often fails to capture complexities of learning.	Uses fuzzy logic and Bayesian networks for nuanced evaluations.	97.13
3	Resource utilization	Inefficient use; often involves duplicative material and static content delivery.	Adaptive content delivery reduces redundancy.	96.51%
4	Handling of uncertainty	Struggles with uncertainty; relies on fixed numerical evaluations that may not reflect true learning outcomes.	Adapts to unclear or missing data using fuzzy logic and Bayesian networks.	97.36%
5	Academic performance	Often reliant on standardized tests; may not fully reflect students’ diverse learning achievements.	Provides a comprehensive evaluation of student abilities beyond test scores.	99.25%