Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 7;11:e3059. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.3059

Table 2. Comparison of parameters, floating point operations (FLOPs), category dice scores, and HD95 for different methods on the MSDPT dataset.

Model Parameter (M) Flops (G) Dice↑
Pancreas Tumor
3DUnet 7.91M 29.745G 0.6606 ± 0.0199 0.2113 ± 0.0914
SegResNet 1.18M 15.430G 0.6832 ± 0.0351 0.2633 ± 0.0842
3DUX-Net 53.0M 631.675G 0.6673 ± 0.0428 0.2889 ± 0.9659
AttentionUnet 23.63M 245.605G 0.6698 ± 0.0561 0.2961 ± 0.1263
UNETR 92.78M 82.550G 0.6148 ± 0.0496 0.1905 ± 0.0664
nnFormer 149.25M 213.485G 0.6664 ± 0.0559 0.2668 ± 0.1224
SwinUNETR 62.17M 329.331G 0.6742 ± 0.0359 0.2801 ± 0.0911
Ours 26.97M 84.837G 0.7108 ± 0.0320 0.3312 ± 0.1111

Note:

Bold values indicate the optimal value of each evaluation index.