Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 7;11:e3059. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.3059

Table 4. Comparison of dice and IOU metrics for different methods on the NIHP dataset.

Model Dice↑ Iou↑ HD95↓
Background Pancreas Mean Background Pancreas Mean Pancreas
3DUnet 0.9995 ± 0.0001 0.6739 ± 0.0570 0.8367 ± 0.0286 0.9990 ± 0.0001 0.5220 ± 0.0642 0.7605 ± 0.0322 37.7600 ± 17.1593
DynUNet 0.9995 ± 0.0001 0.7250 ± 0.0279 0.8623 ± 0.0140 0.9991 ± 0.0001 0.5832 ± 0.0287 0.7911 ± 0.0144 36.6011 ± 27.1476
AttentionUnet 0.9996 ± 0.0001 0.7109 ± 0.0621 0.8552 ± 0.0311 0.9991 ± 0.0002 0.5681 ± 0.0720 0.7836 ± 0.0361 21.7137 ± 11.5158
SwinUNETR 0.9995 ± 0.0001 0.7012 ± 0.0272 0.8504 ± 0.0136 0.9990 ± 0.0001 0.5545 ± 0.0316 0.7768 ± 0.0159 46.2683 ± 19.8101
Ours 0.9996 ± 0.0001 0.7709 ± 0.0264 0.8852 ± 0.0132 0.9992 ± 0.0001 0.6357 ± 0.0306 0.8175 ± 0.0153 15.3267 ± 7.3831

Note:

Bold values indicate the optimal value of each evaluation index.