Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 4;11:e3068. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.3068

Table 4. Efficiency analysis.

Scheme Sig.comp Ver.comp AS
Boneh et al. (2009) (m+n+1)TE1+(m+n1)TM1+mTH1 2cTP+(m+nc)TE1+(m+nc1)TM1+mTH1
Lin et al. (2018) (m+4)TE1+(m+1)TM1+(m+1)TH1 3cTP+(cm+cn+1)TE1+(cm+cn)TM1+(m+n+1)TH1+cTE3+cTM3 ×
Chang et al. (2019) (m+n+3)TE1+(m+n+1)TM1+(m+n)TH1 3cTP+(cm+cn+1)TE1+(cm+cn)TM1+(m+n+1)TH1+cTE3+cTM3 ×
Lin, Xue & Huang (2021) TP+(m+n+1)TE1+(m+n)TM1+(m+2)TH1 4cTP+(m+nc)TE1+(m+nc1)TM1+(m+2c)TH1+cTE3+cTM3
Li, Zhang & Liu (2022) (m+2)TE1+mTM1+mTH1 2cTP+(m+c)TE1+(m+c1)TM1+mTH1+TE2+TM2
Our scheme (m+3)TE1+(m+1)TM1+(m+1)TH1 2cTP+(m+2c)TE1+(m+2c1)TM1+TE2+TM2

Note:

AS, using asymmetric bilinear pairing operations.