Table 9. Performance comparison between this method and other BERT-based methods.
Comparison the performance of DNABERT-CBL with other BERT-based models on key metrics such as accuracy (Acc), F1-score, MCC, precision, sensitivity (Sn), and AUC. DNABERT-2_CA_BL outperforms other models like BERT-Promoter and msBERT-Promoter across multiple metrics, achieving high accuracy, F1, and AUC scores. The maximum value of each column is in bold.
| Model | Acc | F1 | MCC | Precision | Sn | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNABERT-2_C M _BL | 0.858 | 0.857 | 0.727 | 0.869 | 0.858 | 0.924 |
| DNABERT-2_C A _BL | 0.867 | 0.866 | 0.742 | 0.875 | 0.867 | 0.903 |
| BERT-Promoter | 0.848 | 0.846 | – | 0.864 | 0.829 | 0.918 |
| msBERT-Promoter | 0.836 | 0.833 | 0.696 | 0.861 | 0.836 | 0.939 |
| TSSNote-CyaPromBERT | 0.822 | 0.822 | – | 0.824 | 0.820 | 0.899 |