Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 25;11:e2986. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2986

Table 2. Heart failure EHRs dataset—comparison of three different graph representation methods.

Method Graph visualization Neighbor probabilities Communities composition Degree distribution
Distance graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i012.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i013.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i014.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i015.jpg
KNN graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i016.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i017.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i018.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i019.jpg
Similarity graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i020.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i021.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i022.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i023.jpg

Note:

Each row indicates a methodology to generate the graph and each column contains one of the output results of TaGra. We reported a detailed explanation of these output results in Fig. 2. EHRs, Electronic health records; HF, Heart failure.