Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 25;11:e2986. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2986

Table 4. Diabetes type one EHRs dataset—comparison of three different graph representation methods.

Method Graph visualization Neighbor probabilities Communities composition Degree distribution
Distance graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i036.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i037.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i038.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i039.jpg
KNN graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i040.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i041.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i042.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i043.jpg
Similarity graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i044.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i045.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i046.jpg graphic file with name peerj-cs-11-2986-i047.jpg

Note:

Each row indicates a methodology to generate the graph and each column contains one of the output results of TaGra. We reported a detailed explanation of these output results in Fig. 2.