Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 22;26:807. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-12061-3

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Comparison of the runtime performance of global alignment and phylogenetic tree construction. Shown are the runtime performances of the global alignment step combined with the construction of phylogenetic trees. Three representative sequence collections were selected (containing 43, 113, and 212 sequences) and processed in parallel (dark green) or subsequently (light green). The global alignment was conducted either with MAFFT v7.490 [43, 44] or MUSCLE v3.8.1551 [45], the phylogenetic tree was constructed with FastTree v2.1.11 [46, 47], RAxML-NG v1.2.2 [48], or IQ-TREE v2.0.7 [49]. The vertical axis was split between 6 and 100 h in order to visualize all data points