. 2025 Apr 14;71(1):E19–E30. doi: 10.24546/0100495569

Table I.

Absolute liver weight and relative liver weight among experimental groups

Group	Body weight (g)			Absolute liver weight (g)	Relative liver weight (%)^**

	Initial	Final	Percentage change
NC	256.33 ± 20.00^a	268.33 ± 12.22^a	4.86 ± 3.52^a	10.35 ± 1.04^ab	3.99 ± 1.92^a
PC	283.00 ± 35.16^a	262.40 ± 30.37^a	−7.19 ± 2.34^b	8.88 ± 1.39^bc	3.38 ± 0.17^bc
IH+Low WF	271.00 ± 26.88^a	255.00 ± 29.38^a	−6.00 ± 2.75^b	8.46 ± 1.08^c	3.32 ± 0.18^c
IH+Med WF	282.00 ± 33.11^a	277.50 ± 30.57^a	−1.50 ± 2.76^c	10.19 ± 2.13^abc	3.65 ± 0.37^b
IH+High WF	284.17 ± 17.10^a	265.50 ± 14.43^a	−6.52 ± 1.92^b	10.94 ± 0.92^a	4.12 ± 0.20^a

^**

Relative liver weight = Liver weight (g)/Body weight (g) × 100%.

Values are expressed as Mean ± SD. Values with different superscriptions within the same columns significantly differ at P < 0.05. IH, Intermittent Hypoxia; WF, whole Ficus carica; NC, Negative control; PC, Positive control; Low WF: 6.25 ml/kg/day, Med WF: 12.5 ml/kg/day; High WF: 25 ml/kg/day. Values are expressed as Mean ± SD. Different letters (a, b, c) in the same column indicate a significant difference between groups according to the one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) and Duncan post-hoc test. WF, whole of Ficus carica.